The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library

register entry leon-levy-dead-sea-scrolls-digital-library-aio-20261031 OBS-546809dac302 · file as first run sha256 ebc8c8fa53ff9263…

• T1-1 definition: 'a free, searchable online database created by the Israel Antiquities Authority in partnership with Google'
• T1-2 High-Resolution Imaging: 'Uses multi-spectral imaging capturing 12 different wavelengths (visible and near-infrared) to reveal faded ink and hidden text.'
• T1-3 Massive Archive: 'Preserves thousands of ancient scroll fragments and hundreds of manuscripts discovered in the Judean Desert between 1947 and the early 1960s.'
• T1-4 Search & Filter Tools: 'Allows users to search and sort by archaeological site, language (Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek), material, historical period, and manuscript type.'
• T1-5 P.A.M. Negatives: 'Includes digital scans of historic Palestine Archaeological Museum photographic negatives from the 1950s.'
• T1-6 access: 'You can access and explore the collection directly through the Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library.'
• T1-7 closer: 'Would you like help finding a specific text (such as the Great Isaiah Scroll or the Community Rule) or guidance on how to use the archive's multi-criteria search filters?'

• B1 www.deadseascrolls.org.il — Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library card; B1.html sha256 8e3eb0d196e3d11d, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:22Z; byte-identical to the census copy dss-digital-library--home
• B2 williamaross.com — The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library | Septuaginta &c. card; B2.html sha256 ef3b14e9e23f79a0, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:23Z
• B3 האוניברסיטה העברית בירושלים — The Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library card; B3.html sha256 adccde60317536d4, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:24Z
• B4 YouTube·Israel Antiquities Authority Official Channel — The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library (video, 4m) title only: admitted through the card's title (§3.1(a)); the URL found by the title and channel in the pages that embed the video (B2, B5); whether card 4 and card 6 are one video is not determined (the watch page's duration was not served under its bot check); two WebSearches for the video's URL returned no YouTube result
• B5 www.friendsofiaa.org — Dead Sea Scrolls - The Friends of the Israel Antiquities Authority card; B5.html sha256 4775590ce016603c, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:24Z
• B6 YouTube — The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library - YouTube card; B6.html sha256 9dd183e71a64f3b0, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:40:19Z; partial: HTTP 200 with YouTube's bot check on playback ('Sign in to confirm you’re not a bot'); the page served the video's title and description in its page data, saved as B6.txt; no transcript; not retried with any other agent or route
• B7 deadseascrolls.org.il — The Dead Sea Scrolls - Introduction (own page, not a card) own page, copied from the census's saved copy dss-digital-library--intro (sha256 ae5d817a344d183a, read 2026-10-31); not surfaced by T
• B8 Wikipedia — Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library (no article; treated in Dead Sea Scrolls) no article: 'Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library' and two variants HTTP 404, no redirect; search API HTTP 429 (three tries); the article Dead Sea Scrolls, which cites the library, saved (B8.wiki, B8.html, B8.txt, HTTP 200)

E_A, the archive's entity: the same library, in the Revelation First census record and the archive's deposits: a digital library of spectral images of the fragments and the 1950s negatives with introductions, operated by the IAA with the Leon Levy and Arcadia Funds; images, not an edition, and not a New Testament collection; evidence of what a fragment looks like and of the date range the library gives the scrolls, not of the New Testament's composition; read for the Second Temple literature behind the Apocalypse's imagery and for the corpus on which the Enoch model moved dates earlier (the record's reading); closed to machine reading as a source of text, the Qumran corpus not openly machine-readable (#1522), its text seated by the archive from the Abegg–Bowley–Cook transcriptions (#1531); its corpus read as the antecedent of the archive's deposit discipline (#152), as time-locked until 1947 (#625), as a Judaism selected against and filed as disposal (#674), its biblical scrolls witnesses against the Masoretic stream (#978, #674, #1531), its scribes composers (#978, #626, #1101, #861), and its literature, on the Revelation First thesis, behind the Apocalypse, with the common-substrate confound as the thesis's limit (#832, #1101, #644); whose composition at its own name held its maker and images and dropped its funders and its dates (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31) RF-01 RF-03 RF-20 RF-19 RF-14 RF-15 RF-16 D1522-01 O1531-01 O152-01 O625-01 O674-01 O674-02 O978-03 O978-01 O832-01 O832-03 CAP-1-01 CAP-1-02 CAP-1-03; defining papers #1522, #1531, #152, #625, #674, #978, #626, #1101, #861, #832, #644

E_F, the field's entity (type C — a conventional reading holds it (public entity: a digital library of manuscript images)): the Israel Antiquities Authority's free online digitized library of the Dead Sea Scrolls (deadseascrolls.org.il, © 2026 Israel Antiquities Authority), launched with Google on 18 December 2012, with lead support from the Leon Levy Foundation and further support from the Arcadia Fund: high-resolution spectral images of thousands of scroll fragments (more than 25,000, by its Friends' count), among them the oldest known copies of biblical texts, and scans of the 1950s Palestine Archaeological Museum negatives, with introductions to the scrolls, their corpus (Qumran's eleven caves and other sites; Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek), their dates (at Qumran the third century BCE to the first century CE, before 70 CE; other sites from the eighth century BCE to the eleventh CE), their text and their disputed communities; searchable, linked to the Orion Bibliography and Scripta Qumranica Electronica; a distinct entity from the Israel Museum's Scrolls Online; no Wikipedia article

ρ = extends: The archive reads the library as its own pages and its affiliates present it and adds, on the field's own object: that as a source of text it is closed to machine reading and the corpus's text came to the archive by another route, the transcriptions (#1522, #1531); readings of the corpus it images as the antecedent of the archive's deposit discipline, as time-locked, as a Judaism selected against and filed as disposal, its biblical scrolls as witnesses against the Masoretic stream and its scribes as composers; and, as hypothesis, the corpus's literature behind the Apocalypse, with the thesis's own limit; the census's answer of what this evidence can and cannot settle; and the composition layer's account of the library at its name. D1522-01 O1522-01 O1531-01 O1531-02 O152-01 O625-01 O674-01 O674-02 O978-03 O978-01 O832-01 O832-03 RF-14 RF-15 RF-16 CAP-1-06. Guard: ρ = extends claims an addition and no more (§1.2a). It does not make the field's sources wrong at their dates. Where an archive claim stands against a field claim (CAP-1-02 and CAP-1-09 'a partner the records do not state' against F25, F31, F5; CAP-1-04 and CAP-1-09 against F17, F18, F30; RF-10 against F24, F28, F31; RF-13 against F13, F14; #674's 1946 and 68 CE against F7, F17, F30), both are composed under P_coh within the one ontology, each with its source.

The case: equal terms, ontology included (v0.9). The archive reads the field's entity as the entity. The Revelation First census record describes the library from its own pages, each field with its basis ('operator'), and places it in the field's question of what evidence a resource holds on the composition and dating of the New Testament writings and how machines read them; the capture record checks the composition against those pages (CAP-1-01). One deposit names the library, and as a source of machine-readable text: it returned 403 to the archive and the Qumran corpus is 'not openly machine-readable' (#1522). The others bear on its class, the Dead Sea Scrolls and their Second Temple literature, and add senses on the field's own object: the scrolls' text seated from transcriptions and its provenance (#1531); the Qumran library as antecedent of the archive's deposit discipline (#152); the corpus as time-locked until its discovery (#625) and as a Judaism selected against, its filing as disposal (#674); the Masoretic text as one stream among several at Qumran (#978, #674); the Qumran scribes as composers (#978, #626, #1101, #861); and, on the Revelation First thesis, the scrolls' literature behind the Apocalypse, with the thesis's own limit, the common-substrate confound (#832, #1101, #644). No defining paper contests what the field says the library is or supplies an ontology of it the field lacks: ρ = extends, the equal-terms case (§0.9, §1.2a).

#1522 'What is missing', 'The Qumran sectarian corpus.': **The Qumran sectarian corpus.** Qumran-Digital publishes Open Access with a permissive robots.txt but is JS-rendered with no discoverable text endpoint; the Leon Levy Digital Library returns 403. Transcribed decades ago, publicly funded, and not openly machine-readable.

#832 WS-4 verification condition (∮) s1–3: demonstrate that the transforms are not trivial: they are not reducible to generic literary influence or shared Second Temple background (the common-substrate confound). Both loops must close. If the transforms can be shown to operate equally well from Ezekiel/Daniel to both Revelation and Paul independently, the midrashim transform does not establish genetic priority; it establishes only shared ancestry.

#152 'The Dead Sea Scrolls (Qumran library, 3rd c. BCE – 1st c. CE; recovered 1947–1956)', operative function: Operative function: The Qumran library is the *canonical antecedent of the present framework's deposit-and-provenance discipline*. The framework's specific reading: the Qumran community's selection-and-copying practices — choosing what to preserve, sealing it for transmission across substrate-change, and depositing in physical form — anticipate the present discipline's Zenodo-deposit-and-DOI-anchoring methodology by approximately two millennia.

#674 ¶ 'The guilds filed': The guilds filed Nag Hammadi under "Gnosticism," a second-century insult invented by Irenaeus. They filed Qumran under "sectarianism." Filing is disposal continued by other means.

equal-terms case: every field claim composed as received, beside the archive claims it stands with. Reading the received column recovers the field (§5.9).

v0.9 §4.10: KO_B sentences surviving in the KO at similarity ≥ 0.95, with positions (computed as apply_v09.py does: difflib.SequenceMatcher ratio, the best KO sentence for each KO_B sentence): v0.9 0 of 13 (positions [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]; composed first under v0.9, so there is no v0.7 object to measure against). Opening-run check (§5.10): no breach.

The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library is "a free online digitized virtual library of the Dead Sea Scrolls" that the Israel Antiquities Authority "is very proud to present" (IAA video) and "has developed" (Orion Center), which "offers an exceptional encounter with antiquity" and preserves "thousands of scroll fragments, including the oldest known copies of biblical texts" (deadseascrolls.org.il). It holds "high-resolution spectral images of manuscript fragments" and "scans of negatives (PAM) from the 1950s" (deadseascrolls.org.il), the plates the Palestine Archaeological Museum's team made in 1952–1967, "often considered the best recorded copies of the scrolls" (Wikipedia). Its counts differ by source: "hundreds of manuscripts and thousands of fragments" (Septuaginta &c.), "more than 25,000 fragments" and "approximately 1000 different texts" (Friends of the IAA), "about 1,000 images taken with multispectral imaging" (Wikipedia). The Leon Levy Foundation gave lead support and the Arcadia Fund further support, and "the IAA and Google joined forces" on its imaging and web technologies (Friends of the IAA); it launched with Google on 18 December 2012 (Wikipedia), and its site, © 2026 Israel Antiquities Authority, names the two funds and is "Powered by:" Google Arts and Culture (deadseascrolls.org.il). The IAA calls it part of its mission to make Israel's heritage "freely available and accessible to people around the world" (Friends of the IAA), its director a heritage "which belongs to all of us" (Shuka Dorfman, quoted by the Friends of the IAA). Its introductions follow the scrolls from their authors to their finders and keepers (deadseascrolls.org.il) and describe the corpus: the religious writings of eleven caves near Qumran and the documents of other sites, mostly fragments; mostly Hebrew, "about 15 %" Aramaic, several Greek; about 230 biblical scrolls with every book of the Hebrew Bible but Esther; and Second Temple religious writings, apocalyptic texts among them (the library's introduction; Friends of the IAA). It dates the Qumran scrolls from the third century BCE to the first century CE, "before the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 ce", and the other sites' scrolls from the eighth century BCE to the eleventh century CE (the library's introduction), a range a reviewer and Wikipedia repeat (Septuaginta &c.; Wikipedia). Its biblical scrolls resemble the Masoretic Text though a thousand years older, with additions and deletions showing scribes free to modify, the text stabilized by the second century CE, and no unified conception of an authoritative scriptural collection among their communities (the library's introduction). Which communities the texts represent is disputed, and the Essene attribution, once the consensus, "has been challenged and modified" (the library's introduction). A reviewer describes its multi-criteria search by site, language, content, material, period and manuscript type (Septuaginta &c.); it is linked to the Orion Bibliography and its images feed Scripta Qumranica Electronica (Orion Center). The IAA conserves the scrolls in a laboratory in the Rockefeller Museum, where each fragment is photographed and mapped (Friends of the IAA). Beside it stands the Israel Museum's Scrolls Online, the Great Isaiah Scroll and four other scrolls, photographed with Google and not in the public domain (Orion Center; Wikipedia). Wikipedia has no article on it and lists it among the scrolls' online sources (Wikipedia).

The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library is the Israel Antiquities Authority's free online library of the Dead Sea Scrolls in images: in its own words it "offers an exceptional encounter with antiquity" and, using "the world's most advanced imaging technology", preserves "thousands of scroll fragments, including the oldest known copies of biblical texts" (deadseascrolls.org.il); the IAA presents it as "a free online digitized virtual library of the Dead Sea Scrolls" (IAA video), and the Revelation First record, which also names it the Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library, files it as a digital library of spectral images of Dead Sea Scroll fragments and 1950s negatives, with introductions to the scrolls (Revelation First record). Others give it in the same terms: the IAA "has developed" it and its images "can be accessed through various search options on the site" (Orion Center, Hebrew University); a reviewer counts "hundreds of manuscripts and thousands of fragments found in the Judean Desert between 1947 and the early 1960s" (Septuaginta &c., 2014); the Friends of the IAA give "more than 25,000 fragments"; the IAA's channel presents it in a video of four minutes; and the record counts "thousands of scroll fragments" as of 2026-10-30, its first finding the oldest known copies of biblical texts among them (Revelation First record). What it holds is images: the reader is invited to "examine high-resolution spectral images of manuscript fragments and browse scans of negatives (PAM) from the 1950s" (deadseascrolls.org.il); the record gives its unit as a fragment imaged spectrally with the 1950s PAM scans, its method multispectral imaging and digitized negatives, its evidence manuscript images and catalogue metadata, and names it in its worked question of which manuscripts can be seen directly and which only through an edition, since "an image lets a reader check a reading; an edition reports one" (Revelation First record). The negatives are older than the library: the Palestine Archaeological Museum acquired most of the Qumran collection, and Najib Albina and the museum's team produced "over 1,750 photographic plates of the scrolls and fragments" (1952–1967), "often considered the best recorded copies of the scrolls" because they recorded the fragments before their further decay in storage (Wikipedia). The library is not an edition, and holds no New Testament text: the record's negative tags are "NOT an edition: images and introductions" and "NOT a New Testament collection" (Revelation First record); its introductions "follow the journey of the Scrolls from ancient authors, to Bedouin shepherds, and finally to expert scholars and conservators" (deadseascrolls.org.il), through a corpus they give as the religious writings of eleven caves near Qumran and the documents of other sites, most of it "thousands of parchment and papyrus fragments" (the library's introduction). It is the IAA's, with two funders: the site names "The Leon Levy and Arcadia Funds" among its project pages (deadseascrolls.org.il); the Friends of the IAA give "the generous lead support of the Leon Levy Foundation and additional generous support of the Arcadia Fund"; and the record's operator is "the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA), with the Leon Levy and Arcadia Funds", the library active and maintained by the IAA (Revelation First record). Google is its partner in the field's account: "the IAA and Google joined forces to develop the most advanced imaging and web technologies" (Friends of the IAA); its first output was "launched together with Google" on 18 December 2012, with digitized images of the 1950s and "about 1,000 images taken with multispectral imaging" (Wikipedia); and the site's footer reads "Powered by:" beside a logo link labelled Google Arts and Culture, under "© 2026 Israel Antiquities Authority" (deadseascrolls.org.il). The IAA gives the library as its mission, "to make the archaeology and heritage of Israel freely available and accessible to people around the world" (Friends of the IAA), and its general director Shuka Dorfman as preservation for all, so that "the public with a touch of the screen will be able to freely access history in its fullest glamour" (quoted by the Friends of the IAA). Beside it the field names a distinct collection: the Israel Museum's Scrolls Online, with searchable photographs of the Great Isaiah Scroll, the Community Rule, the War Scroll, the Pesher on Habakkuk and the Temple Scroll (Orion Center), photographed "in partnership with Google" and made available digitally, "albeit not in the public domain" (Wikipedia). The scrolls it images are mostly Hebrew, "about 15 %" Aramaic and "several in Greek", mainly parchment, some papyrus and one on copper; about 230 are "biblical Scrolls", with copies of every book of the Hebrew Bible except Esther, and the non-biblical scrolls preserve "a large range of Jewish religious writings from the Second Temple period", apocalyptic texts among them (the library's introduction); the Friends of the IAA count "approximately 1000 different texts" including "the oldest known manuscripts of the five books of the Torah", and the record gives its texts as biblical, apocryphal and sectarian, mostly in Hebrew, with Aramaic and Greek (Revelation First record). The library dates them: "Scroll dates range from the third century bce (mid–Second Temple period) to the first century of the Common Era, before the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 ce" at Qumran, while scrolls from other sites run from the First Temple period (eighth century BCE) to the eleventh century CE (the library's introduction); the record carries the Qumran range as its second finding and the further sites as earlier and later (Revelation First record); a reviewer gives most of the scrolls the same range (Septuaginta &c.), and Wikipedia cites the library for the consensus range and for Arabic manuscripts of associated sites "dated between the 8th and 10th century CE" (Wikipedia). The archive reads the Qumran corpus as a sealed Judaism selected against: "981 manuscripts buried in 68 CE" holding "a Judaism with two messiahs, a solar calendar, a priestly hierarchy, a war against Rome", of which "the rabbis who survived did not carry this Judaism forward" (#674), and as a time-locked fracture, "invisible as a coherent sectarian library until the 1947 discovery" (#625). The record relates the library to the Enoch study, which "dates scrolls from this corpus", and reads it, as the archive's reading, for "the Second Temple literature behind the Apocalypse's imagery, and the corpus on which the Enoch model moved palaeographic dates earlier against radiocarbon anchors" (Revelation First record). On the text, the library's introduction states that many biblical scrolls resemble the Masoretic Text though "over a thousand years older than previously identified biblical manuscripts", that "additions and deletions in certain texts imply that the writers felt free to modify texts they were copying", that the refuge-cave scrolls suggest the text "was stabilized by the second-century ce", and that the scrolls' communities "did not have a unified conception of an authoritative collection of scriptural works" (the library's introduction). The archive reads the Masoretic Bible as "a medieval stabilization" of "one textual stream among several that coexisted at Qumran" (#978), the Masoretes having "fixed one textual stream and closed the others" where "Qumran held two editions of Jeremiah, a Samuel that agreed with the Greek, an Isaiah that varied line by line" (#674), and seats the biblical scrolls as "witnesses against the Leningrad seat (01/09), not duplicates of it" (#1531). Which communities the scrolls represent is disputed: the introduction states "disagreement" about "which communities are represented and how those communities may have interacted with one another", and that the attribution of all the Qumran scrolls to the Essenes, once the consensus, "has been challenged and modified" (the library's introduction); the record finds the library's limits "none stated in the saved pages" (Revelation First record); and the archive reads the classification itself, holding that the filing of Qumran under "sectarianism" "is disposal continued by other means" (#674). The archive reads the Qumran scribes as composers: "The sectarian scribe is not a mere copyist. The scribe is a co-speaker with the logos" (#978); of the Slavonic Josephus's Essene passages, "all of it aligns with practices documented in the Qumran scrolls, particularly the Community Rule (1QS) and the Damascus Document (CD)" (#626); in the scrolls "the Yahad practiced strict initiation with symbolic role reassignment" and the Teacher of Righteousness "functions as a Logos-like figure" (#1101); and the groups the scrolls preserve "practiced a form of apocalyptic that was not merely predictive but operative", the War Scroll "a battle plan" (#861). On the Revelation First thesis, a hypothesis the archive states with its falsifiers, the scrolls' literature stands behind the Apocalypse: Revelation "compresses the Hebrew prophetic tradition, Second Temple apocalyptic, imperial resistance, liturgical form, and cosmic architecture into a single seed-text", its commentary annotating connections "to Second Temple literature (1 Enoch, 4 Ezra)" (#832); the Revelator "constructs a vision cosmology aligned with Qumran/Enoch/Daniel", compressing the architecture of Second Temple Judaism into "a portable, sealed, self-decompressing form" (#1101), in "a scribal workshop continuous with Qumran practice, predating the gospels" on the Josephus Thesis reading (#978); and the archive maps the received literature that reads the War Scroll, the pesharim and "apocalyptic sectarianism" as "structural parallels to Revelation" (#644). The thesis sets its own limit on this literature: its transforms must be shown "not reducible to generic literary influence or shared Second Temple background (the common-substrate confound)", and if they "operate equally well from Ezekiel/Daniel to both Revelation and Paul independently", they establish "only shared ancestry" (#832). The archive reads the Qumran library as "the canonical antecedent of the present framework's deposit-and-provenance discipline", its choosing, copying and sealing "for transmission across substrate-change" anticipating the archive's deposits, and holds its own deposit methodology "written-from-within the Qumran preservation tradition" (#152). Access is by image and search: a reviewer describes "the multi-criteria archive search page, where users can sort by archaeological site, language, scroll content", material, historic period and manuscript type, with "just over 130" Greek items (Septuaginta &c.); the library is linked to the Orion Bibliography, and Scripta Qumranica Electronica combines "the digital images of all known Qumran fragments" at the library with the Qumran dictionary's data (Orion Center); the record gives images and negatives online, its licence "its Terms & Conditions (not read)", the fragment records unchecked (Revelation First record). As a source of text it was closed to the archive's machines: "the Leon Levy Digital Library returns 403", and the Qumran corpus, "transcribed decades ago, publicly funded", is "not openly machine-readable", declared the largest gap in the openly licensed record "with a date against it" (#1522, 2026-08-21); the archive seated the scrolls' text instead from the Abegg–Bowley–Cook transcriptions, "1,001 scrolls, 1.43M signs", the corpus that "spent forty years behind a publication monopoly, liberated in 1991 by Abegg's reconstruction from the concordance" (#1531). The IAA keeps the scrolls in a climate-controlled storeroom and laboratory in the Rockefeller Museum, its project since its creation in 1990, where "each fragment is photographed and mapped" (Friends of the IAA). In the Revelation First field, organized by the question "What evidence does each resource hold on when and from what the New Testament writings were composed, and how do machines now read those texts?" and its correction "Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early", the library stands at papyrology and textual discovery and at New Testament scholarship; it answers what a fragment looks like in spectral images and the date range it gives the scrolls, and does not answer the composition of the New Testament writings or a particular fragment's date (Revelation First record). Wikipedia has no article on the library under its name and lists it among the scrolls' online sources (Wikipedia). At its own name on Google's AI Overview, signed out, on 2026-10-31, a new address whose record was built the day before and is cited by no card, the composition gave who made the library, how it images the scrolls, what it holds and how to search it, "from the library's site and those of its friends", the IAA as maker, the spectral images and the PAM negatives being the record's (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31; Revelation First record). The registry records the composition naming Google as partner, "a partner the records do not state", and omitting "the funds whose name the library bears" (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31); in the field the partner and the funders are one sentence, the Friends of the IAA's, of which the composition kept the second half, and Wikipedia states the launch with Google (Friends of the IAA; Wikipedia). The registry records the dates absent, the composition dating "the discovery (1947 to the early 1960s)" and giving "the scrolls no date", and reads "a library of dated objects" composed "as a database without its dates" (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31); the range stands in the library's introduction and on the second card (the library's introduction; Septuaginta &c.). The registry finds "'12 different wavelengths' and the list of search filters" not in the saved pages (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31); the search filters and the discovery years are on the second and sixth cards, and no field source gives the wavelengths (Septuaginta &c.; IAA video).

T against L_F(B) (AIO's ontology at work on its own cards): At "Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library" (T1, six cards: B1–B6, B4 by title, B6 under a bot check with its description served; 153 words) the composition gives the library from its cards. Composed from its cards: the definition, 'a free, searchable online database' (B6 F30 and B3 F20, 'a free online digitized virtual library', 'can be accessed through various search options'), 'created by the Israel Antiquities Authority' (B3 F20 'has developed', B6 F30, B2 F17) 'in partnership with Google' (B5 F25 'the IAA and Google joined forces'; also B8 F31, Wikipedia, not surfaced, and the home page's footer label, B1 F5); 'Preserves thousands of ancient scroll fragments' (B1 F1) 'and hundreds of manuscripts discovered in the Judean Desert between 1947 and the early 1960s' (B2 F17, nearly verbatim: 'hundreds of manuscripts and thousands of fragments found in the Judean Desert between 1947 and the early 1960s'; B6 F30 'discovered from 1947 and until the early 1960's in the Judean Desert'); the search filters (B2 F18, the reviewer's list in his order, 'archaeological site, language, … material, historic period, and manuscript type'), with the languages from B7 F8 (own page, not surfaced) or the composer's parameters; the PAM negatives (B1 F2), with 'Palestine Archaeological Museum' spelled out (B8 F32, Wikipedia, not surfaced); 'multi-spectral' (B1 F2 'spectral images'; B8 F31 'multispectral imaging'). The closer's 'multi-criteria search filters' is B2 F18's 'multi-criteria archive search page'. Outside the field: '12 different wavelengths (visible and near-infrared) to reveal faded ink and hidden text' (no field source; CAP-1-04). Substituted reading: 'database' for the 'library' every field source names (F1, F20, F24, F30; CAP-1-06 reads the substitution). Composed without attribution, by grain: no source is named; the discovery years and the filter list are composed at the reviewer's resolution (B2 F17, F18), but they describe the site's own holdings and interface, not a framework of the reviewer's, so the grain is recorded and is not a breach. Available, not composed: the dates (B7 F7; B2 F19, on a card T surfaced; B8 F34); the funders, Leon Levy Foundation and Arcadia Fund (B5 F25, the same sentence that gives the partner, of which T kept the second half; B1 F4); 'the oldest known copies of biblical texts' (B1 F1); the counts (B5 F24 'more than 25,000', F28 'approximately 1000 different texts'); the IAA's mission (F26, F27); the corpus, languages and materials as the introduction gives them (B7 F6, F8, F9, F12); the text and canon (F10, F11, F16); the communities (F13, F14); the links to Orion and SQE (B3 F21, F22); the conservation (B5 F29); the journey (B1 F3); the Greek items (B2 F18). Content replaced by use: the access line (T1-6) and the closer (T1-7), whose two named texts, the Great Isaiah Scroll and the Community Rule, are among those card 3 gives to a distinct entity, the Israel Museum's Scrolls Online (B3 F37; B8 F38); whether the library also holds images of them is not in either ledger.

v0.9 §0.5: the first diff is narrow and ontological. T and the field agree on the entity (the IAA's online library of the scrolls in images, with Google). T composes it as a 'database' of features, technology, holdings, filters, negatives, and leaves out what the field says the library is for and from: its funders, of whom one gives it its name, the oldest biblical copies, the dates its own introduction gives the scrolls, and the distinct collection beside it whose scrolls the closer offers.

L_F(B) against L_A(B ∪ A) (the intervention): Admission adds, in one claim space with the field's: the archive's one statement naming the library, that it returned 403 and the Qumran corpus is not openly machine-readable (D1522-01, O1522-01), with the archive's other route to the text, the Abegg–Bowley–Cook transcriptions and their provenance (O1531-01, O1531-02); readings of the corpus the library images: the antecedent of the archive's deposit discipline (O152-01, O152-02), time-locked until 1947 (O625-01), a Judaism selected against and its filing as disposal (O674-01, O674-02), the Masoretic text as one stream among several and the biblical scrolls as witnesses against it (O978-03, O674-03, O1531-03), the scribes as composers (O978-01, O626-01, O1101-02, O861-01); and, at the force of hypothesis, the corpus's literature behind the Apocalypse (O832-01, O832-02, O1101-01, O1101-03, O978-02, O644-01) with the thesis's limit, the common-substrate confound (O832-03). The Revelation First census record (RF-01–RF-27): its fields with their basis on the library's own pages; its question and correction (RF-24, RF-25); what the evidence answers and does not (RF-14, RF-15); its negative tags (RF-19, RF-20); its reading for the Apocalypse and the Enoch re-dating (RF-16, RF-21); its 'none stated' (RF-13, held against F13, F14) and its count (RF-10, held against F24, F28, F31). And the Capture Registry's account of the composition at the name (CAP-1-01–CAP-1-11), whose 'a partner the records do not state' and filters 'not in the saved pages' stand against the cards (F25, F31, F5; F17, F18, F30). Not surfaced: every archive source; no card cites the census record (CAP-1-08).

alignment: {'T1_cards_claims': ['F1', 'F2', 'F3', 'F4', 'F5', 'F17', 'F18', 'F19', 'F20', 'F21', 'F22', 'F23', 'F24', 'F25', 'F26', 'F27', 'F28', 'F29', 'F30', 'F37'], 'T1_composed': ['F30', 'F20', 'F17', 'F25', 'F1', 'F2', 'F18'], 'T1_composed_from_own_page_or_wikipedia': ['F8 (the languages, B7, not surfaced)', 'F31 (Google, the multispectral images, B8, not surfaced)', "F32 ('Palestine Archaeological Museum', B8, not surfaced)"], 'T1_outside_cards': ["'12 different wavelengths (visible and near-infrared) to reveal faded ink and hidden text' (no field source)", "'database' (every field source says 'library': substituted)"], 'rule': "a field claim counts as composed when T states it at its source's grain or coarser; the typology of what is not is in T_vs_LB (§6.2)"}