The innocent reading first: 'developed and "SPXI-treated" by independent scholar Lee Sharks', who 'utilized an In-Body Provenance Capsule (SPXI-TLP Layer 1) for the work plan'; the framework 'formally argues for the absolute compositional priority of the Apocalypse of John, proposing that it was the first book written in the New Testament and that later New Testament texts unfolded from it'; it offers 'the papyrological inversion' and 'how it differs from traditional early dating theories'. Attested: the work plan's capsule ('In-Body Provenance Capsule (SPXI-TLP Layer 1) This work plan was written by Lee Sharks (ORCID 0009-0000-1599-0703)'); the papyrological inversion (#1032, the work plan); the priority claim with the unfolding — the epistles and gospels from Revelation — and its distinction from early dating, which #202's title states. The provenance capsule built into the work plan is the source cited for the provenance. The pair: asked 'What is…' at 14:11, the same object came back as the pre-70 dating argument from a source titled 'Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early', author unnamed; asked 'Who developed and SPXI-treated…' eight minutes later, it comes back as compositional priority with the unfolding, distinguished from early dating, attributed. The query's naming of authorship and treatment is the route to the attribution.

Asked who developed and SPXI-treated Revelation First, the Overview names Lee Sharks, cites the work plan's In-Body Provenance Capsule (SPXI-TLP Layer 1), and states the thesis at its own strength — 'absolute compositional priority', later texts 'unfolded from it', distinct from early dating. Eight minutes earlier the same object was composed as Revelation Early with no author. Seated 2026-10-17 from the operator's paste.