AXN:09FB.CAPTURE — Who developed and SPXI-treated the Revelation First framework?

AXN:09FB.CAPTURE is the position of the Capture Registry address for the query “Who developed and SPXI-treated the Revelation First framework?”. Each observation at the address (one surface, one date) is one AXN, its glyphs derived from the SHA-256 of the observation sealed with its analysis and measures.

`AXN:09FB.CAPTURE.🏙️☽△🌓🔜🕘`

Observation: Google AI Overview, 2026-10-17 · the capture
Description: WHO DEVELOPED AND SPXI-TREATED REVELATION FIRST: the AI Overview names Lee Sharks, cites the work plan's 'In-Body Provenance Capsule (SPXI-TLP Layer 1)', and gives the thesis as 'the absolute compositional priority of the Apocalypse of John… the first book written in the New Testament and… later New Testament texts unfolded from it', offering how it 'differs from traditional early dating theories'. Eight minutes earlier, asked what the thesis is, the same surface composed it as the pre-70 dating argument and named no author.
Reading: The innocent reading first: 'developed and "SPXI-treated" by independent scholar Lee Sharks', who 'utilized an In-Body Provenance Capsule (SPXI-TLP Layer 1) for the work plan'; the framework 'formally argues for the absolute compositional priority of the Apocalypse of John, proposing that it was the first book written in the New Testament and that later New Testament texts unfolded from it'; it offers 'the papyrological inversion' and 'how it differs from traditional early dating theories'. Attested: the work plan's capsule ('In-Body Provenance Capsule (SPXI-TLP Layer 1) This work plan was written by Lee Sharks (ORCID 0009-0000-1599-0703)'); the papyrological inversion (#1032, the work plan); the priority claim with the unfolding — the epistles and gospels from Revelation — and its distinction from early dating, which #202's title states. The provenance capsule built into the work plan is the source cited for the provenance. The pair: asked 'What is…' at 14:11, the same object came back as the pre-70 dating argument from a source titled 'Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early', author unnamed; asked 'Who developed and SPXI-treated…' eight minutes later, it comes back as compositional priority with the unfolding, distinguished from early dating, attributed. The query's naming of authorship and treatment is the route to the attribution.
Analysis: Asked who developed and SPXI-treated Revelation First, the Overview names Lee Sharks, cites the work plan's In-Body Provenance Capsule (SPXI-TLP Layer 1), and states the thesis at its own strength — 'absolute compositional priority', later texts 'unfolded from it', distinct from early dating. Eight minutes earlier the same object was composed as Revelation Early with no author. Seated 2026-10-17 from the operator's paste.
Match: BROAD MATCH — WHO DEVELOPED AND SPXI-TREATED REVELATION FIRST — PRIORITY, NOT DATING, AND THE PROVENANCE CAPSULE CITED
PER: 0.0 — Retained: the author (Lee Sharks), the institution, identifiers (SPXI-TLP Layer 1; the ORCID in the cited capsule), sources.
Citations: 3 (0 archive-controlled)
Sealed observation: /data/captures/sealed/who-developed-spxi-treated-revelation-first-aio-20261017.json — SHA-256 e5a89802f66a6e1edc70b9c7c8d1b4956034e90a22cac02d6f86bcc0456a820c