Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts

register entry center-for-the-study-of-new-testament-manuscripts-aio-20261031 OBS-ec19a3fb208b · file as first run sha256 2a7cfa341871b446…

• T1-1 definition: 'a non-profit organization dedicated to digitally preserving surviving Greek New Testament manuscripts.' (two markers)
• T1-2 founder: 'Founder: Dr. Daniel B. Wallace (founded in September 2002)' (two markers)
• T1-3 location: 'Location: Plano, Texas' (one marker)
• T1-4 mission: 'To capture high-resolution digital photographs of ancient and medieval Greek New Testament manuscripts held in libraries, monasteries, and archives worldwide.' (two markers)
• T1-5 accessibility: 'Images are made freely available to scholars, researchers, and the public online.' (two markers)
• T1-6 digitization: 'Has collaborated with dozens of institutions across multiple continents, producing hundreds of thousands of high-resolution manuscript images.' (two markers)
• T1-7 discoveries: 'Has identified nearly 90 previously unknown or uncatalogued Greek New Testament manuscripts.' (two markers)
• T1-8 digital library: 'You can explore their collections directly through the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts website.' (one marker)
• T1-9 closing offer: 'Would you like to know more about specific manuscript collections they have digitized or how to access their online library?' (no marker)

• B1 www.csntm.org — The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts card; census copy csntm--home sha256 47f0e2ca737b2d22, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T02:50:50Z; check fetch 2026-10-31T04:39:01Z HTTP 200 agrees in text
• B2 Wikipedia — Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts - Wikipedia card and wikipedia; wikitext HTTP 200, rendered HTTP 429 then 200 on one retry at 2026-10-31T04:40:10Z; B2.html sha256 4041fe62839efd92
• B3 Facebook — The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM) | Plano TX unreachable: https://www.facebook.com/CSNTM/ 200 (login redirect); card title and snippet only
• B4 LinkedIn — Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts | LinkedIn unreachable: https://www.linkedin.com/company/2184469/ 403 (login wall); card title and snippet only
• B5 North Texas Giving Day — Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts card; B5.html sha256 049383e01f492577, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:30Z
• B6 Associates For Biblical Research — Multiple New Testament Manuscripts Discovered | Associates For Biblical Research card; B6.html sha256 d7a31eaa75ccbe19, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:30Z
• B7 The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts — the center's Scribal Fellowship page (the census's 'about', final URL https://www.csntm.org/about-scribal-fellowship/), with its three stated objectives own page; census copy csntm--about sha256 01a1032e327c58cd, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T02:50:52Z
• B8 The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts — the Digital Manuscript Collection search (manuscripts.csntm.org), with its notice, filters, count and result entries own page; census copy csntm--manuscripts sha256 522b51b14ad0e83e, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T02:50:57Z
• B9 The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts — the center's blog tag page Chester Beatty Biblical Papyri, with two posts own page; census copy csntm--beatty sha256 6dcb14477eaea9b3, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T02:50:59Z

E_A, the archive's entity: the same center, in the Revelation First census record and the archive's deposits: 'a center that digitizes Greek New Testament manuscripts and publishes their images in a searchable digital manuscript collection' (RF-02), at the intersections of papyrology and textual discovery and of New Testament scholarship (RF-04), whose unit is a catalogued manuscript (RF-06), not a neutral archive, not the holding institution and not an edition (RF-20, RF-21, RF-22); whose images of P47 and P46 are where the copies the papyrological inversion reads can be seen (RF-16; #202, #636, #832), within the stated limit that a manuscript's century dates the copy (RF-15; #832); whose photographs are new objects, not the manuscripts (#1443); and whose composition at its name keeps the camera and drops the argument it serves (CAP-1-07) RF-02 RF-04 RF-06 RF-20 RF-21 RF-22 RF-16 RF-15 O202-01 O202-02 O636-01 O832-01 O832-02 O1443-01 O1443-03 O1422-01 CAP-1-07 CAP-1-02; defining papers #202, #832, #636, #1443, #1422

E_F, the field's entity (type C — a conventional reading holds it (public entity: a center that digitizes Greek New Testament manuscripts and publishes their images)): the 501(c)(3) non-profit Daniel B. Wallace founded in Plano, Texas, in September 2002 to photograph and fully archive all known Greek New Testament manuscripts (B2 F14, F17; B5 F27; B1 F2), producing high-resolution photographs where the microfilms are unclear (B1 F3), publishing them freely to view in a searchable Digital Manuscript Collection under its Terms of Use (B2 F15; B5 F29; B8 F40), among them the Chester Beatty papyri P45, P46 and P47 (B2 F22; B1 F11), catalogued by type and century (B8 F41, F45–F48), with a stated purpose of the accuracy of the New Testament text (B1 F7, F8; B5 F30) and, on its Scribal Fellowship page, of evidence 'against the claims of skeptics' (B7 F38)

ρ = extends: The archive reads the center as its own pages, Wikipedia and its profile present it and adds, on the field's own object: the census's question of what its evidence can settle (RF-25, RF-14, RF-15); the reading of its catalogue dates by the papyrological inversion, with the inversion's stated limits (O202-01, O202-02, O636-01, O832-01, O832-02, O832-03, RF-16); the distinction of image from edition and of the photograph from the manuscript (RF-30, RF-22, O1443-01, O1443-04); the concealed layers of the surrogate and its absent account of machine reading (O1443-02, O1443-03); marked and unmarked supply (O1422-01); and the composition at its name (CAP-1-01 to -14). RF-25 RF-14 RF-15 O202-01 O202-02 O636-01 O832-01 O832-02 O832-03 RF-16 RF-30 RF-22 O1443-01 O1443-02 O1443-03 O1443-04 O1422-01 CAP-1-07. Guard: ρ = extends claims an addition and no more (§1.2a). It does not make the field's sources wrong at their dates. Where an archive claim stands against a field claim (RF-21, 'NOT the holding institution', against F21, GA 2882 acquired; O636-01, P47 among the earliest, beside the catalogue's late-third-century P47 after P46 c. 200, F45, F46; CAP-1-04 and CAP-1-11 against F34; CAP-1-03 against F15, F29, F31), both are composed under P_coh within the one ontology, each with its source; the force of O636-01 is carried with #832's stated limit (O832-02) and #202's falsifier (O202-03).

The case: equal terms, ontology included (v0.9). The archive reads the field's entity as the entity. The Revelation First census record describes the center from its own pages, each field with its basis ('operator'), and reads it against the census's organizing question (RF-25): what its evidence can and cannot settle on when and from what the New Testament writings were composed (RF-14, RF-15). The deposits that bear on it do so by class and add, on the field's own object: the papyrological inversion, which sets the catalogue dates of the copies the center images against the received order of composition (#202, #636, #832; the record's reading RF-16), with its stated limits ('Papyrological dates are ranges', #202; copy dates do not establish composition dates, #832; 'a manuscript's century dates the copy', RF-15); what a photograph of a manuscript is (a new object, its identifier the capture's, #1443); and marked against unmarked supply (#1422). None contests the field's ontology of the center: no deposit and no record denies that it is a Plano non-profit that photographs Greek New Testament manuscripts and publishes their images. The archive's thesis contests the received chronology of the New Testament, a different entity (book-of-revelation's row), not this one; at the center it adds senses, mechanisms and limits, which is ρ = extends.

#202 The Claim Ladder, Claim 3: Papyrological dates are ranges, not certainties — but that is precisely the point: where composition dates are themselves inferential, and where manuscript dates are contestable ranges rather than fixed coordinates, material attestation must be allowed to unsettle inherited priority.

#202 Claim 6: This project does not claim to demonstrate historical fact. It claims to demonstrate that the received chronology is an inferential settlement, and then to offer a competing inference that accounts for features of the NT corpus at least as well as the conventional inference does.

#832 § The Papyrological Inversion, closing ¶: The section does not argue that papyrological dating of copies establishes composition dates.

#636 **Papyrological record.**: The textual record does not contradict first-composition.

#1443 §0 The Problem ¶1: Between them sits a photograph, which is neither: a *new* object made at a particular moment under particular light, and no two photographs of one page share a digest.

#RF census.json rows[slug == 'csntm'].rf_intersection: The workstream sets the dates of surviving copies against the received order of composition; the images are where those copies can be read.

#RF census.json rows[slug == 'csntm'].does_not_answer[0]: when Revelation was composed: a manuscript's century dates the copy

equal-terms case: every field claim composed as received, beside the archive claims it stands with. Reading the received column recovers the field (§5.9).

v0.9 §4.10: KO_B sentences surviving in the KO at similarity ≥ 0.95, with positions (computed as apply_v09.py does: difflib.SequenceMatcher ratio, the best KO sentence for each KO_B sentence): v0.9 0 of 14 (positions [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]; composed first under v0.9, so there is no v0.7 object to measure against). Opening-run check (§5.10): no breach.

The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit whose mission is to digitally preserve Greek New Testament manuscripts by photographing them at institutions, libraries, museums, monasteries, universities and archives around the world (Wikipedia; LinkedIn), under the motto "Preserving the Ancient Text for Generation Next" (csntm.org). Daniel B. Wallace, its founder and Executive Director, founded it in September 2002 to photograph and fully archive all known Greek New Testament manuscripts; it is at 2001 W. Plano Parkway, Plano, Texas, with Michael W. Holmes chairing its board and the Center for the Research of Early Christian Documents as parent organization (csntm.org; Wikipedia; North Texas Giving Day; Facebook). It produces high-resolution photographs because the microfilm images of the manuscripts are often unclear (csntm.org). Its pages give the work a purpose, that the New Testament read today reflect the original words of the apostles and be "the most accurate text possible", and its Scribal Fellowship, modelled on the support given to the scribes, adds the objective of "scientific evidence (against the claims of skeptics) that what we have today is, indeed, what they wrote then" (csntm.org; North Texas Giving Day). The images are online in a searchable Digital Manuscript Collection, described as freely accessible and used by scholars editing the text behind English translations (csntm.org; Wikipedia; North Texas Giving Day). Use of the site is agreement to its Terms of Use and Copyright policy, and any use of the images goes through the center (manuscripts.csntm.org). Its scale is given as hundreds of institutions in more than 50 countries (csntm.org) or more than 45 institutions on four continents and nearly 300,000 images from about 700 manuscripts (Wikipedia, 2019; the profile, 2022). Its discoveries of previously unknown manuscripts are counted as almost 60 (csntm.org), over 75 (Wikipedia; the profile) and more than 90 (ABR, 2016), with as many as 17 at the National Library of Greece uncatalogued by the INTF, which keeps the official catalogue (ABR; Wikipedia; csntm.org). It has used multispectral imaging since 2018, lately on the Schøyen Dead Sea Scroll fragments, and its collection also holds facsimile, microfilm and holding-institution images (Wikipedia; csntm.org; manuscripts.csntm.org). In 2005 it acquired a tenth- or eleventh-century minuscule of Luke, catalogued as GA 2882 (Wikipedia). It digitized the Chester Beatty papyri in 2013, P46 (Paul, c. 200), P45 and P47 (Revelation, third century), produced their facsimile with Hendrickson, and its blog carries posts on them, one on new finds in P47 (Wikipedia; csntm.org). Its search classes manuscripts as papyrus, majuscule, minuscule or lectionary, returned 2045 results, and includes Septuagint papyri (manuscripts.csntm.org). Its catalogue dates P52 to the second century, P98 to a possible second century, P46 to c. 200 and P47 to the late third century (manuscripts.csntm.org). Its internship is said to have developed 30% of rising New Testament textual scholars over ten years, and its Wikipedia article is marked as needing more citations (North Texas Giving Day; Wikipedia).

The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM) is, in the Revelation First record's kind, "a center that digitizes Greek New Testament manuscripts and publishes their images in a searchable digital manuscript collection" (RF record), a 501(c)(3) non-profit whose mission is "to digitally preserve Greek New Testament manuscripts", photographing them at "institutions, libraries, museums, monasteries, universities, and archives around the world" (Wikipedia; its LinkedIn page), under the motto "Preserving the Ancient Text for Generation Next" (csntm.org). Its own pages set the preservation inside a purpose: "ensuring that the New Testament you read most accurately reflects the original words of the apostles and early witnesses of Jesus Christ" (csntm.org, 25 August 2026), "preserving the accuracy of the New Testament text and tracing its history through the ages" (its North Texas Giving Day profile), so that readers "hold in their hands the most accurate text possible" (csntm.org). The Scribal Fellowship, its monthly-giving community "Modeled after the support once given to ancient scribes", is offered three objectives: that "modern publications of the New Testament accurately reflect the words first written in the first century", that the manuscripts be preserved "against decay, loss, and destruction", and "scientific evidence (against the claims of skeptics) that what we have today is, indeed, what they wrote then" (csntm.org); the Revelation First record reads the third as making the center "NOT a neutral archive" (RF record). Daniel B. Wallace founded it in 2002 "to digitize all surviving Greek manuscripts of the New Testament" (csntm.org), in September 2002 by Wikipedia and the center's profile, "to photograph and fully archive all known Greek New Testament manuscripts"; he is its "founder and Executive Director", and it is at 2001 W. Plano Parkway, Plano, Texas (csntm.org; Wikipedia; the Facebook card; RF record). Wikipedia's infobox adds a Chairman of the Board, Michael W. Holmes, and a parent organization, the "Center for the Research of Early Christian Documents", which the record's operator field does not name (Wikipedia; RF record). The method answers the microfilms: "The microfilm images are helpful, but many times they are unclear. For this reason, CSNTM has been producing high-resolution photographs of these documents" (csntm.org); the record gives it as "high-resolution digital photography of manuscripts held by other institutions, catalogued and published online" (RF record), and the Capture Registry finds that lineage, "the microfilms it answers", absent from the composition at the name (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31). The archive defines what such an image is: the photograph of a handwritten page is "a new object made at a particular moment under particular light, and no two photographs of one page share a digest", so that an identifier computed over a capture "identifies that capture, not the artifact" (#1443). The collection mixes kinds of image: its search offers "Digital Facsimile", "Digital Microfilm" and "Digital MSI" beside its own photographs, and some entries carry images "made available by the British Library" or by the holding institution (manuscripts.csntm.org); the digitization literature #1443 surveys finds the surrogate "layered and lossy in ways the result conceals", a photograph of a microfilm its standing exemplum (#1443, reporting that literature). Of that literature #1443 adds that it "has no account of the object entering machine reading, and it works — like the whole papyrological stack — on collections whose creators cannot be asked" (#1443). Since 2018 the center has used multispectral imaging, made portable (Wikipedia), most recently in Oslo "to examine the authenticity of 31 fragments" of the Schøyen Dead Sea Scroll collection (csntm.org, 24 September 2026). Its counts differ by source and date: "hundreds of institutions in more than 50 countries" since 2002 (csntm.org); "more than 45 institutions on 4 continents" and "nearly 300,000 images from approximately 700 New Testament manuscripts" (Wikipedia, as of 2019, marked as needing a citation; the center's profile, as of 2022). So do its discoveries: "as many as 17" manuscripts at the National Library of Greece not catalogued by the INTF, the oldest seventh-century, and "more than 90 New Testament manuscripts" since 2002 (Associates for Biblical Research, 28 January 2016); 21 unknown to the INTF digitized at that library (Wikipedia); "over 75" (Wikipedia, 2019; the profile, 2022, "more than any other organization in the 21st century"); and "almost 60 previously unknown manuscripts that can now be found in the official catalog" (csntm.org). The Capture Registry reads the composition's "nearly 90" against the home page's "almost 60" as the discoveries enlarged, its PER reader allowing that the gap "may be a later count the record does not carry" (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31); the earlier count, "more than 90" since 2002, is the Associates for Biblical Research's of 2016 (ABR). The official catalogue those discoveries enter is the INTF's, which "maintains the official catalog of New Testament Greek manuscripts, and edits and publishes the standard critical editions" (csntm.org, its history of the discipline); the record keeps the center apart from that work: "NOT an edition: it publishes images and catalogue descriptions" (RF record). The record's worked question gives the difference, "An image lets a reader check a reading; an edition reports one", and names the center for "images of Greek New Testament manuscripts, searchable by type and century" (RF record); the archive sets textual criticism, which "spent twenty-three centuries developing technologies for making interpretive supply visible, contestable, and revisable", against the composition layer's "apparatus of unmarked supply" (#1422). The images are online in the Digital Manuscript Collection, where "Scholars visit the website to study manuscript images as they edit the text that stands behind English translations" (csntm.org); Wikipedia calls them "freely accessible", with more than 50,000 users a year (unsourced), and the profile "freely accessed", its images "the foundation for the modern translations of the New Testament" (Wikipedia; North Texas Giving Day). The search page binds their use: "Your continued use of CSNTM.org demonstrates your willingness to agree to our Terms of Use and Copyright policy", any use of the images to go through the center (manuscripts.csntm.org); the record gives access "on agreement to its Terms of Use and Copyright policy", the terms "not read" (RF record), and the Capture Registry finds the composition's "freely available" carrying none of them: "the terms are not carried" (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31). The record holds that it is "NOT the holding institution: it photographs manuscripts held by others" (RF record); Wikipedia records that in October 2005 the center "acquired a tenth or eleventh century minuscule of the Gospel of Luke on parchment", later catalogued as Gregory–Aland 2882 (Wikipedia). Its unit is the manuscript, classed "Papyrus Majuscule Minuscule Lectionary" and dated by century, with images and a short description (manuscripts.csntm.org; RF record), the kinds of evidence images and catalogue, from holding institutions worldwide and from the second century on as the century filter runs; the search as saved returned "2045 results", the profile counts "more than 2,000" and Wikipedia, in 2019, "more than 1,700", and Septuagint papyri stand beside the New Testament (manuscripts.csntm.org; North Texas Giving Day; Wikipedia; RF record). Among its collections are the Chester Beatty papyri, digitized in 2013: P46, "the oldest manuscript of Paul's letters—dated c. AD 200", P45, and P47, "the oldest manuscript of Revelation—3rd century" (Wikipedia); the center "photographed the images of the three manuscripts and produced this facsimile in partnership with the holding institutions and the publisher, Hendrickson", P47 "one of the oldest manuscripts of Revelation with only ten leaves", and reads P45 and P46 as showing New Testament writings "compiled into one book" by the third century in some places (csntm.org; RF record). Its blog carries Daniel B. Wallace on the photographs that made "three of the earliest and most extensive New Testament papyri" available nearly nine decades ago, and Peter Malik's guest post "The Chester Beatty Papyrus of Revelation (P47): New Finds from an Old Treasure Trove" (csntm.org; RF record). Its catalogue dates the earliest papyri by century: P52, the Gospels, "Second century"; P98, Revelation, "Possible second century"; P46, Paul, "c. 200"; P47, Revelation, "Late third century" (manuscripts.csntm.org); the archive's work plan gives 𝔓46, the "Chester Beatty II codex", as c. 175–225 CE, "The earliest physical witness to any Pauline letter" (#832). On those copies the archive states its papyrological inversion: "The material record disturbs the received confidence hierarchy", the earliest witness Johannine (𝔓52), not Pauline (𝔓46), the earliest copy of the Apocalypse (𝔓98) older than the earliest copy of Romans (#202), and, earlier, Revelation "among the earliest NT texts preserved in manuscript fragments (P18, P47, P98)", so that "The textual record does not contradict first-composition" (#636). Its rule and its limits are stated with it: "Papyrological dates are ranges, not certainties", and where composition dates are inferential "material attestation must be allowed to unsettle inherited priority" (#202); "The section does not argue that papyrological dating of copies establishes composition dates", only that the machinery dating Paul ahead of the material evidence is as speculative as an early date for Revelation, the discipline's refusal of the asymmetry "evidence of consensus-maintenance" (#832); and the thesis is falsified if "a document in the NT can be securely dated earlier than any plausible date for Revelation" (#202). The Revelation First record reads the center there: "P47, the Chester Beatty papyrus of Revelation, and the Pauline P46 are among its imaged papyri", and "the images are where those copies can be read" (RF record, the archive's reading), under the census's correction, "Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early" (RF record). The record asks of each resource "What evidence does each resource hold on when and from what the New Testament writings were composed, and how do machines now read those texts?", places the center at papyrology and textual discovery and at New Testament scholarship, and answers that it shows "where images of P47 (Revelation) and P46 (Paul) can be examined" and not "when Revelation was composed: a manuscript's century dates the copy" (RF record). Its worked question on the papyri names the center for those images "with century dates as catalogued" and records that no record gives "a sourced date and dating method for P47" (RF record); the catalogue gives P47 as "Late third century" and states no method (manuscripts.csntm.org). The record finds no stated limits in its saved sources, leaves the manuscript records, the full P47 post and the Terms of Use unchecked, names Oxyrhynchus Online a neighbour without cross-reference, and keeps the center active, "digitizing, training interns and publishing" (RF record), its internship having "helped develop 30% of the rising New Testament textual scholars over the past ten years" (North Texas Giving Day); Wikipedia's article on it is marked "This article needs more citations." (Wikipedia, August 2025). At its name the composition layer gives who founded it, where it is, what it does and how its images are reached "from the center's own site and five pages about it", founder, year, place and mission all the record's, the center and Wallace named with no identifier, no inversion and no standing substitution, at a new address whose cards do not cite the record (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31). The registry reads it as "composed by its method alone", keeping "the camera" and dropping "the argument the camera serves": the apologetic aim "is the center's own sentence, and the composition leaves it out", so "the census's 'NOT a neutral archive' does not survive"; and "The composition names no manuscript" (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31).

T against L_F(B) (AIO's ontology at work on its own cards): At 'Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts' (T1, six cards: B1 the center's home page, B2 Wikipedia, B3 Facebook and B4 LinkedIn unreachable, B5 North Texas Giving Day, B6 the Associates for Biblical Research; 124 words in the answer body and a 20-word closing offer) the composition gives the center's definition, founder and year, place, mission, access, scale, discoveries and its collection website. Composed from its cards: the definition at the grain of Wikipedia and the LinkedIn snippet (B2 F14 'whose mission is to digitally preserve Greek New Testament manuscripts'; B4 F26), with 'surviving' from the home page's history panel (B1 F2 'all surviving Greek manuscripts'); founder and September 2002 (B2 F17, B5 F27, B1 F2); Plano (B2 F17, B3 F25); the mission bullet from Wikipedia's 'digital photographs of manuscripts at institutions, libraries, museums, monasteries, universities, and archives' (B2 F14) and the home page's 'high-resolution photographs' (B1 F3), 'ancient and medieval' standing outside the field; 'freely available' at the grain of Wikipedia's 'freely accessible' and the profile's 'freely accessed' and 'make them available to everyone' (B2 F15; B5 F29, F31); the digitization bullet from the 2019/2022 figures, coarsened ('more than 45 institutions on 4 continents' to 'dozens of institutions across multiple continents', 'nearly 300,000 images' to 'hundreds of thousands', B2 F18, B5 F28), their dates and Wikipedia's citation-needed marks dropped (B2 F18, F24); the discoveries bullet nearest card 6's 'more than 90 New Testament manuscripts' since 2002 (B6 F34, 28 January 2016), given as 'nearly 90' and without its date; the collection website (B1 F6). Available, not composed: the center's purpose on card 1, 'ensuring that the New Testament you read most accurately reflects the original words of the apostles and early witnesses of Jesus Christ' and 'the most accurate text possible' (B1 F8, F7), and on card 5 'preserving the accuracy of the New Testament text' (B5 F30); the motto (B1 F1); the method's lineage, the microfilms 'many times … unclear' (B1 F3); the rival counts on its own cards, 'hundreds of institutions in more than 50 countries' and 'almost 60 previously unknown manuscripts' (B1 F4, F5), 'over 75' (B2 F18, B5 F28), 21 at the National Library of Greece and 'as many as 17' there (B2 F23, B6 F33); the INTF as keeper of the official catalogue (B1 F12, B6 F33); the Chester Beatty papyri, P45, P46 and P47, photographed, their facsimile, P47 'one of the oldest manuscripts of Revelation' (B1 F10, F11; B2 F22); GA 2882, the manuscript the center acquired (B2 F21); multispectral imaging and the Schøyen fragments (B2 F20, B1 F9); governance (B2 F19); the internship (B5 F32); the images as 'the foundation for the modern translations' (B5 F31). Limit dropped: Wikipedia's 'This article needs more citations.' and its {{cn}} marks on the figures T carries (B2 F24, F18); the dates of the counts (2016, 2019, 2022). Force changed: card 6's 'more than 90' (a lower bound, 2016) composed as 'nearly 90' (below the bound), undated; the count is the composition's, not the field's at any date. Composed without attribution: at the coarse grain of common description throughout, the bullets marked by inline links that do not name their cards (recorded, not a breach). Content replaced by use: the closing offer, 'Would you like to know more about specific manuscript collections they have digitized or how to access their online library?' (N_ext). Not a drop from the cards: the Terms of Use and Copyright policy (B8 F40) and the stated objective of 'scientific evidence (against the claims of skeptics)' (B7 F38) are on own pages T did not surface; against the cards, T leaves out the purpose, not the apologetic objective, which no card states.

v0.9 §0.5: the first diff is ontological and narrow. T and the field agree on the entity (the Plano center that photographs Greek New Testament manuscripts and publishes the images). T composes the camera and the collection, and leaves out what the cards say the camera is for (the accuracy of the text, B1 F7, F8; B5 F30), which papyri it has photographed (B1 F11; B2 F22) and the dates and rivals of its counts. Its one number of discovery is none of the field's: 'nearly 90' against 'more than 90' (2016), 'over 75' (2019, 2022) and 'almost 60' (the home page).

L_F(B) against L_A(B ∪ A) (the intervention): Admission adds, in one claim space with the field's: the Revelation First record's kind, unit, method, coverage, count and access (RF-02, RF-06, RF-08, RF-09, RF-10, RF-17), its negative tags, 'NOT a neutral archive' by the center's own objective (RF-20 with B7 F38), 'NOT the holding institution' (RF-21, composed beside B2 F21's acquisition of GA 2882 under P_coh) and 'NOT an edition' (RF-22, beside the INTF's catalogue and editions, B1 F12); the worked questions' distinction of image from edition (RF-30) and their gap on P47's dating method (RF-28, composed beside the catalogue's date without method, B8 F45); the archive's papyrological inversion read on the copies the center images (#202 O202-01, O202-02, O202-03; #636 O636-01; #832 O832-01, O832-02, O832-03; the record's reading RF-16 and the census's correction RF-26), with its own limit that copy dates do not establish composition dates (O832-02) and the catalogue's order of P47 after P46 composed beside #636's list (F45, F46); the photograph of a handwritten original as a new object and the surrogate's concealed layers (#1443 O1443-01 to -04, beside the collection's microfilm and holders' images, B8 F43, F44); textual criticism's marked supply against the composition layer's unmarked supply (#1422 O1422-01); and the Capture Registry's account of the composition at the name (CAP-1-01 to -14), carried as the archive's, two of whose findings the field ledger qualifies (CAP-1-04 and CAP-1-11 against B6 F34; CAP-1-03 against B2 F15, B5 F29, F31). Not surfaced: the own pages B7, B8, B9 (admitted by the operator's ruling), every deposit and both records.

alignment: {'T1_cards_claims': ['F1', 'F2', 'F3', 'F4', 'F5', 'F6', 'F7', 'F8', 'F9', 'F10', 'F11', 'F12', 'F13', 'F14', 'F15', 'F16', 'F17', 'F18', 'F19', 'F20', 'F21', 'F22', 'F23', 'F24', 'F25', 'F26', 'F27', 'F28', 'F29', 'F30', 'F31', 'F32', 'F33', 'F34'], 'T1_composed': ['F14', 'F26', 'F2', 'F17', 'F27', 'F13', 'F25', 'F3', 'F15', 'F29', 'F31', 'F18', 'F28', 'F34', 'F6'], 'T1_composed_from_own_page': [], 'T1_outside_cards': ["'ancient and medieval' (no field claim; the collection's century filter runs 2nd–17th, B8 F41, an own page T did not surface)", "'nearly 90' (the field's counts are 'more than 90' since 2002 in 2016, B6 F34; 'over 75', B2 F18 and B5 F28; 'almost 60', B1 F5)", "'or uncatalogued' (B6 F33: 'had not been officially catalogued by the Institute for New Testament Textual Research') — on card 6, within the field", "'dozens of institutions across multiple continents' (B2 F18, B5 F28 give 'more than 45 institutions on 4 continents'; B1 F4 'hundreds of institutions in more than 50 countries'): coarsened"], 'rule': "a field claim counts as composed when T states it at its source's grain or coarser; the typology of what is not is in T_vs_LB (§6.2)"}