Checked against the card's page and #700. restoredacademy/sigil/index.html line 547 is the caption of the Snub-Poemed image ('(Jack Feist, 2013). … Anne Carson described it as "a cool poem." It is also a portrait of Johannes Sigil.'); line 594, after the heading 'What I hold', reads 'Each document below is DOI-permanent under CC BY 4.0 in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive on Zenodo.' The card's snippet splices the two with '...'. The body's 'The Project' bullet restates line 594; its opening sentence and 'The Connection' bullet read the caption's 'it' through the splice. #700 §I records the remark of 2013 as 'a useful reception trace' that 'is not evidence for the poem's argument'. Operator's statement, 2026-10-08 14:01 EDT: 'she did say that, of snub-poemed, maybe 13-14 years ago. she also called sappho future reader a 'weird idea'. thats basically the entire history of the correspondence.' The second remark is in no archive text.

Scope inflation by snippet splice: the card's ellipsis closes forty-seven lines of page, the pronoun crosses it, and a remark on one poem is composed as a judgment of the archive. 'brief but characteristic' and 'recognizing its distinct blend of poetry and archival documentation' are the composition's own; no source gives them. The Nobel-day Yale Review card supplies 'laureate'. Set beside 'anne carson and johannes sigil' the same hour, where the same caption keeps its object at one poem and loses its name. Seated 2026-10-08 from the operator's message of 14:10 EDT, on the attestation in the same message ("signed out, incognito, expanded from popup").