Digital Labour Platform Policy Tracker

register entry ilo-digital-labour-platform-policy-tracker-aio-20261029 OBS-3a975d1658be · file as first run sha256 7cb18f8d6c7ff499…

• T1-1 definition: 'The International Labour Organization (ILO) Digital Labour Platform Tracker is a global policy database that monitors how countries regulate platform work through legislation, collective bargaining agreements, and judicial decisions.' (three markers)
• T1-2 global coverage: 'Tracks policy developments, laws, and agreements across more than 30 countries (including Australia, China, Italy, the United States, and others).' (two markers)
• T1-3 core issues monitored: 'Employment status classification', 'Remuneration and fair pay', 'Algorithms and automated decision-making', 'Working time', 'Privacy and data protection', 'Occupational safety and health (OSH)', 'Contract termination and account deactivation', 'Collective bargaining' (one marker)
• T1-4 target audience: 'Built for governments, employers' and workers' representatives, policymakers, and researchers to support evidence-based policymaking.' (one marker)
• T1-5 the Convention: 'Decent Work in the Platform Economy Convention, 2026 (No. 193): Adopted as the first international labour standard to promote decent work and protect digital platform workers.' (no marker)
• T1-6 the Observatory: 'Observatory on AI and Work in the Digital Economy: The broader institutional framework under which the tracker operates.' (three markers)
• T1-7 closer: 'Would you like to explore specific country policies, legal classification rules, or algorithmic transparency guidelines tracked by the ILO?'

• B1 International Labour Organization — Homepage | Digital Labour Platform Tracker card; B1.html sha256 a0263bc6dd6c7e39, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-29T22:31:08Z
• B2 International Labour Organization — ILO launches Global Policy Tracker on Digital Labour Platforms | International Labour Organization card; B2.html sha256 9b2b9a1fdd16b54b, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-29T22:31:10Z; byte-identical to the census copy ilo-platform-policy-tracker--launch
• B3 International Labour Organization — Digital labour platforms | International Labour Organization card; B3.html sha256 b9b778e34d8e08e3, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-29T22:31:44Z
• B4 Medium·Reshaping Work — Mapping the Future of Platform Work: How the ILO's New Tracker Helps card, unreachable: 403 Cloudflare 'Attention Required!' bot check (5188 bytes, saved as B4-publication-403.html); 404 'Not Found – Medium' (saved as B4-feed-404.html); title and snippet stand
• B5 YouTube·International Labour Organization — Decent work in the platform economy: how a new global labour standard can help ... card, unreachable: 200 a result 'Decent work in the platform economy: how a new global labour standard can help make it a reality', International Labour Organization, videoId Cmv4lC7acPY, length 24:01, '2mo ago' (saved as B5-search.html); 429 redirected to google.com/sorry (a bot check; saved as B5-429.html); title stands
• B6 International Labour Organization — ILO expands Digital Labour Platform Policy Tracker to include collective bargaining agreements own page (census copy ilo-platform-policy-tracker--cba-expansion, read 2026-10-29), B6.html sha256 278fc5938b834101; agrees with the census's sha256: True
• B7 International Labour Organization — Observatory on AI and Work in the Digital Economy own page (census copy ilo-platform-policy-tracker--observatory, read 2026-10-29), B7.html sha256 402a902dac92f13a; agrees with the census's sha256: True
• B8 Wikipedia — Digital Labour Platform Policy Tracker (no article; cited once, in Santosh Lad) Wikipedia: no article (HTTP 404 for three names, 429s refetched); one citation in Santosh Lad; B8.html sha256 fd7cb8c1590a9033

E_A, the archive's entity: the same tracker, in the Labor Vector census record and the archive's deposits: a global policy tracker whose labor object is work and employment on digital labour platforms, supplied by platform workers and directed by platform companies with the automated decision-making systems its rules address, governments regulating and unions bargaining, its gains not recorded as outcomes; evidence of two kinds, the policy tracker and the negotiated provision, at three intersections (worker power, AI governing labor, gains and losses), which can say which jurisdictions regulate which issues and which EU agreements exist, and cannot say how the rules are enforced or what they change; meeting the directionality stack at the layer of rules on who may direct labor and how (LV record); whose class the archive reads as law that keeps collective bargaining while containing labor (#239), institutional demands at risk of capture (#148), platform work in which the worker bears the risk and the platform takes the data and the value (#713, #469), gig time algorithmically governed (#433), ghost work paid badly (#163), employment-status reclassification as a cost (#950), and workers the archive's own class category does not take as a demographic (#1545); whose composition at its own name stands a phase ahead of itself (Capture Registry, 2026-10-29) LV-02 LV-07 LV-08 LV-09 LV-10 LV-04 LV-05 LV-17 LV-19 LV-22 O239-01 O148-02 O713-01 O469-01 O433-01 O163-01 O950-01 O1545-01 CAP-1-08; defining papers #239, #148, #713, #469, #433, #163, #950, #1545

E_F, the field's entity (type C — a conventional reading holds it (public entity: a policy tracker of an intergovernmental organization)): the International Labour Organization's global tracker of laws, policies and decisions on platform work (digitallabour.ilo.org; also the Policy Tracker on Digital Labour Platforms), launched 14 August 2025 as a key feature of the ILO Observatory on AI and Work in the Digital Economy, which consolidates national and regional legislative and policy initiatives on employment status classification, remuneration, automated decision-making systems (algorithms), working time, workers' personal data, safety and health, termination and suspension, and collective bargaining, for governments, the social partners, policymakers and researchers, to support social dialogue and evidence-based policymaking; currently legislation worldwide (33 countries on its homepage, with 'Other initiatives' beside legislation and agreements) and, since 7 November 2025, a component of collective bargaining agreements between trade unions and platform companies, within the European Union by the CBA item and publicly available in Europe by the homepage; its stated next phase wider coverage, judicial decisions and continuous updating; compiled with twelve legal scholars; beside it, distinct, the Decent Work in the Platform Economy Convention, 2026 (No. 193); no Wikipedia article

ρ = extends: The archive reads the tracker as the ILO presents it and adds, on the field's own object: who supplies, directs and gains from the labor its rules govern, and that the gains are not recorded; what its evidence can and cannot settle (not enforcement, not workers' conditions); where it meets the directionality stack; the law's form of the bargaining it records and the risk of capture of the demands it tracks; the direction of platform labor (risk, data, value, algorithmic time, pay, status); and the composition layer's placing of its next phase in its present. LV-08 LV-09 LV-10 LV-19 LV-27 LV-22 LV-23 O239-01 O239-03 O148-01 O148-02 O713-01 O469-01 O433-01 O163-01 O950-01 O1545-01 CAP-1-08 CAP-1-09. Guard: ρ = extends claims an addition and no more (§1.2a). It does not make the field's sources wrong at their dates. Where an archive claim stands against a field claim (LV-29 and LV-12 against F3 and F9, the European Union or Europe; LV-14 against F6, the count; LV-28 against F1, judicial decisions as aim), both are composed under P_coh within the one ontology. The archive's readings of labor law (#239) and of institutional demands (#148) are composed beside the ILO's statements of the tracker's purpose (F13, F16, F21), not in their place.

The case: equal terms, ontology included (v0.9). The archive reads the field's entity as the entity. The Labor Vector census record describes the tracker from the ILO's own pages, each field with its basis ('operator' or 'observed'), keeps the resource's own terms apart from its reading, and answers for it the census's question of who supplies the labor, who directs it and who receives its gains; its reading (lv_intersection) places the tracker at the layer of rules on who may direct labor and how, and states none on DSL, task-origin or user labor drag. No deposit names the tracker. The deposits bear on its classes and add senses and limits on the field's own object: law that keeps collective bargaining as vocabulary while containing labor (#239), the labor-law tradition's platform-worker-rights organizing as an institutional demand at risk of capture (#148), platform work as risk to the worker and data and value to the platform (#713, #469), gig time algorithmically governed (#433), ghost work paid badly (#163), employment-status reclassification as a cost (#950), and the archive's own class category kept apart from gig workers as a demographic (#1545). #239's reading of law ('This is not conspiracy. It is architecture.') is a reading of labor law as a class, not of the tracker; it does not contest that the tracker is the ILO's record of laws, policies and agreements, and adds a limit on what such rules are, which the census record states in its own terms ('how the rules are enforced or what they change for platform workers', not answered). No defining paper contests the field's ontology of the tracker or supplies one the field lacks: ρ = extends, the equal-terms case (§0.9, §1.2a). The registry's reading of the composition (a phase ahead of itself) takes the ILO's own statement of its next phase as given and is the field's own distinction carried to the composition layer.

#LV census.json schema_note: lv_intersection (where it meets DSL, task-origin and user labor drag: the archive's reading, kept apart from the resource's own terms)

#LV census.json rows[slug == 'ilo-platform-policy-tracker'].lv_intersection: The tracker records the legal and bargained rules laid over platform work, including rules on automated decision-making systems; it meets the directionality stack at the layer of rules on who may direct labor and how.

#239 §IV, the list after 'This is what law does to labor continuously': The law speaks labor's language while administering labor's containment.

#239 §V, after the list: This is not conspiracy. It is architecture.

#148 §5.3 Tier 3: Institutional Demands, 'Political tradition' and 'What they accomplish': They contest the current regime at the level of law and policy.

#148 §5.3, 'Their political limit': Institutional demands alone risk *being captured by the regime they would transform*.

#1545 §14 Negative edge table: **Semantic Proletariat is not:** content creators · knowledge workers · the creative class · AI annotators · gig workers

equal-terms case: every field claim composed as received, beside the archive claims it stands with. Reading the received column recovers the field (§5.9).

v0.9 §4.10: KO_B sentences surviving in the KO at similarity ≥ 0.95, with positions (computed as apply_v09.py does: difflib.SequenceMatcher ratio, the best KO sentence for each KO_B sentence): v0.9 0 of 13 (positions [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]; composed first under v0.9, so there is no v0.7 object to measure against). Opening-run check (§5.10): no breach.

The Digital Labour Platform Policy Tracker is the International Labour Organization's global policy tracker, launched on 14 August 2025 as a "Global tracker of laws, policies, and decisions on platform work" giving a comprehensive overview of legislative initiatives on digital labour platforms (ILO launch item). Its homepage states its aim as an overview of global policies, legislation, collective bargaining agreements and judicial decisions on digital labour platforms, and the ILO's portals give it as the "Policy Tracker on Digital Labour Platforms" in the launch item's words (tracker homepage; ILO platforms portal; ILO Observatory). It consolidates national and regional legislative and policy initiatives for social dialogue and evidence-based policymaking, for governments, employers' and workers' representatives, policymakers and researchers, as a key feature of the ILO Observatory on AI and Work in the Digital Economy (ILO launch item; tracker homepage). Its issues are employment status classification, remuneration, automated decision-making systems (algorithms), working time, workers' personal data and privacy, occupational safety and health, contract termination including suspension, and collective bargaining (ILO launch item). The ILO sets it in a platform economy that is transforming the world of work, with new income opportunities and decent work deficits, the challenges of incomes, social security and safety, and governments regulating or discussing the regulation of platform work (ILO platforms portal; ILO launch item). It currently focuses on legislation worldwide and on collective agreements publicly available in Europe, with up-to-date information on existing regulations; its homepage lists 33 countries with legislation, agreements and "Other initiatives", the latest legislation of 2026 (tracker homepage; ILO launch item). Twelve legal scholars are thanked for helping compile it (tracker homepage). Its collective bargaining component, added on 7 November 2025, covers agreements between trade unions and platform companies, each by content, scope and legal status at national, sectoral or enterprise level within the European Union, filterable by country and platform type, as part of the ILO's monitoring of work on digital labour platforms; the homepage lists an agreement for Swiss couriers (ILO CBA item; tracker homepage). Its next phase is to extend geographic and thematic coverage, integrate judicial decisions and update the database continuously; the homepage says it will further develop agreements in other regions and the judicial decisions (ILO CBA item; tracker homepage). The Observatory, the leading international knowledge hub on the world-of-work dimensions of AI, aims to support governments and social partners; beside the tracker it carries the ILO's estimate of generative AI's effects on occupations and lists algorithmic management among its themes, as the platforms portal does (ILO Observatory; ILO platforms portal). In June 2026 the International Labour Conference adopted the Decent Work in the Platform Economy Convention, 2026 (No. 193), the first international labour standard on the platform economy, promoting decent work and protecting platform workers (ILO platforms portal), the subject of an ILO video (YouTube, title only). A third-party post dates the launch to August 2025 (Medium, snippet only). Wikipedia has no article on the tracker; it is cited once, as a source in the article on Santosh Lad (Wikipedia).

The Digital Labour Platform Policy Tracker, at digitallabour.ilo.org, is in the Labor Vector record a global policy tracker, "a database of legislation, policies and decisions, with a collective bargaining agreements component" (LV record), and in the words of its launch item the International Labour Organization's "Global tracker of laws, policies, and decisions on platform work", launched on 14 August 2025 "to provide a comprehensive overview of legislative initiatives concerning digital labour platforms" (ILO launch item). Its homepage gives its aim as an overview of "global policies, legislation, collective bargaining agreements, and judicial decisions related to digital labour platforms" (tracker homepage); the ILO's platforms portal and its Observatory carry the launch item's description under the name "Policy Tracker on Digital Labour Platforms" (ILO platforms portal; ILO Observatory), one of the five names the record lists (LV record). The census asks of each resource "Who supplies the labor, who directs it, and who receives its gains — and what kind of evidence does this resource bring to that question?", and answers for the tracker that the labor is "work and employment on digital labour platforms" (LV record; the ILO's phrase in its CBA item), supplied by "workers on digital labour platforms", directed by "platform companies, with the automated decision-making systems (algorithms) the tracked rules address; governments regulate and trade unions bargain", its gains "not recorded as outcomes" (LV record). Its unit is the national or regional legislative or policy initiative, consolidated "to facilitate social dialogue and evidence-based policymaking" (ILO launch item), and in its second component the agreement between trade unions and platform companies, each compiled and described "by content, scope and legal status" (LV record). It sheds light on how jurisdictions address "employment status classification, remuneration, automated decision-making systems (algorithms), working time, workers’ personal data and privacy, occupational safety and health, contract termination, including suspension and collective bargaining" in platform work (ILO launch item). The record places it at three of Labor Vector's intersections, worker power, AI governing labor and the distribution of gains and losses, with two kinds of evidence, the policy tracker and the negotiated provision (LV record), and the ILO sets algorithmic management beside it as a related topic and a thematic area (ILO platforms portal; ILO Observatory). Of the class of AI governing labor on platforms the archive holds that in the gig economy time "is not merely measured but algorithmically governed" (#433), and its patent-poem DashFace names its field "looking at people who are working for you and deciding, based on their facial expressions, how much they deserve to be paid" (#713). The ILO frames the tracker by a platform economy that "is significantly transforming the world of work" alongside "decent work deficits" (ILO platforms portal), with new income opportunities for women, young people and persons with disabilities among others and the challenges of "adequate incomes, social security, occupational safety and health, and other protections", as governments in many countries regulate or discuss regulating work on platforms (ILO launch item). Of who gains, the archive's DashFace holds that the platforms "converted the employment relationship into a "partnership" in which the worker assumed all risk (vehicle, fuel, insurance, maintenance, taxes) while the platform captured all data" (#713, with its later instances #1390 and #1391), and Johannes Sigil that the platform extracts value from gig workers and from the meaning-production that makes the gig economy seem "a normal business rather than a wage-suppression engine", which it cannot do without the semantic infrastructure that makes the relation legible as "partnership" rather than "wage theft" (#469). Of platform micro-work the archive reports, after Gray and Suri, labor at scales "entirely absent from the public discourse on AI capability", and holds that ghost work, "the labor of telling the model what is already known to be true", is "paid badly" while variance-generative labor "is not paid at all" (#163). Employment status, the first issue the tracker covers (ILO launch item), stands in the archive's worked case as a cost: a delivery driver whose app "reclassifies them as independent contractor" and will cancel their insurance, a cause the clinical protocol "does not include a code for" (#950). The archive keeps its own class category apart from these workers: "Semantic Proletariat is not:" content creators, AI annotators, gig workers or platform users, being a class relation and not a demographic (#1545). "Currently, the tracker focuses on legislative developments worldwide, and includes collective bargaining agreements which are publicly available in Europe" (tracker homepage), giving "comprehensive and up-to-date information on existing regulations worldwide" (ILO launch item), compiled with twelve legal scholars it thanks by name (tracker homepage). Its homepage grid lists 33 countries, among them China with 8 legislative records and the United States with 10, and in all 58 legislative records, 15 collective agreements and 11 "Other initiatives", a third category of regional and local instruments such as the Tuscany Guidelines for Digital Platform Riders, its latest legislation adopted in 2026 (tracker homepage; the count is the composer's, of the grid); the record states no count, the application being unsaved and unopened (LV record). On 7 November 2025 the ILO added a component "focusing specifically on collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) related to platform work": "agreements concluded between trade unions and platform companies across various countries and sectors", each described by content, scope and legal status at national, sectoral or enterprise level "within the European Union", filterable "by country and platform type" (ILO CBA item; LV record). The record carries the component as covering agreements "within the European Union" (LV record), where the homepage says "publicly available in Europe" and lists a multiparty agreement for Swiss couriers (tracker homepage). Of collective bargaining as a legal form the archive holds that law keeps it (""Collective bargaining" survives") while excising class antagonism, so that "The law speaks labor's language while administering labor's containment"; in law labor's transformation becomes a right to bargain "within the wage system", the National Labor Relations Act having been "explicitly designed to channel labor conflict into administrable forms", and law "recognizes labor insofar as labor becomes governable" (#239). It is "A new ILO resource to support evidence-based policymaking and social dialogue on platform work", designed to equip governments and employers' and workers' representatives "to facilitate discussions and foster decent work in the platform economy" (ILO launch item), and a practical resource for them, for policymakers, researchers and "anyone interested in understanding the policy developments in this area" (tracker homepage; ILO launch item). The archive places the labor-law tradition's "platform-worker-rights organizing" among the institutional demands that "contest the current regime at the level of law and policy", and states their limit: "Institutional demands alone risk being captured by the regime they would transform" (#148). The tracker is "a key feature of the ILO Observatory on AI and Work in the Digital Economy" (ILO launch item), which calls itself "the leading international knowledge hub on the world-of-work dimensions of AI and the digital economy" and aims to support governments and social partners in managing the digital transformation of work (ILO Observatory), the operator the record names (LV record); beside the tracker the Observatory carries the ILO's methodology "to estimate the effects of generative AI on existing occupations" (ILO Observatory), the record's neighbour (LV record). The record gives no findings for it, "none stated as findings"; it can answer which jurisdictions have initiatives on platform work and on which issues, and which platform-work agreements exist in the EU and at what level, but not "how the rules are enforced or what they change for platform workers", and it is "NOT a measure of platform workers' conditions" (LV record). In the record's worked questions it supplies "the rules that address algorithmic management on platforms" and, with two other resources, laws and EU agreements against automated monitoring and discipline, none of the three recording "whether a provision is enforced or what it changes at work" (LV record), its neighbour there Berkeley's Negotiating Tech for U.S. contracts (LV record). The archive's reading in the record is that the tracker "records the legal and bargained rules laid over platform work, including rules on automated decision-making systems; it meets the directionality stack at the layer of rules on who may direct labor and how", and the record states "None" on DSL, task-origin or user labor drag (LV record). The homepage states that the tracker "will further develop the collective bargaining agreements in other regions as well as the judicial decisions" and will be updated as new regulations, agreements and decisions emerge (tracker homepage); the CBA item gives its next phase as "expanding geographic and thematic coverage, integrating judicial decisions related to the platform economy, and continuously updating the database" (ILO CBA item), which the record carries as its stated limit, as "NOT a court-decision database yet", and as unchecked "whether judicial decisions have since been added" (LV record). At its name on Google's AI Overview, 2026-10-29, the composition held the eight issues and the audience, checked against the census record and the sources it saved, on the innocent reading that the Overview defines the tracker from the ILO's pages (Capture Registry, 2026-10-29). It gave judicial decisions as tracked now, which the ILO gives as its next phase, so that "A policy tracker is composed a phase ahead of itself", the record's limit being "the line the composition crosses", with the phased chain not carried and no date given (Capture Registry, 2026-10-29). Its count of more than 30 countries stands in neither the record nor the sources the record saved (Capture Registry, 2026-10-29); the homepage grid, which the record did not save, lists 33 (tracker homepage). Beside the tracker stands a distinct instrument: in June 2026 the International Labour Conference adopted the Decent Work in the Platform Economy Convention, 2026 (No. 193), which promotes decent work and formalization and establishes protections for digital platform workers, "This first international labour standard on the platform economy" (ILO platforms portal), the subject of an ILO video on "how a new global labour standard can help" (YouTube, title only); the registry finds that the record does not carry it and should, once read from the ILO's own text (Capture Registry, 2026-10-29). A third-party post dates the launch to August 2025 (Medium, snippet only); the record keeps the launch and the component's dates, an active life with continuous updating announced, and no licence stated, the ILO's pages carrying its copyright (LV record). No card cites the record, which landed the same day (Capture Registry, 2026-10-29), and Wikipedia has no article on the tracker, which appears in article space once, as the cited source for Karnataka's Platform Based Gig Workers Act, 2025 in the article on Santosh Lad (Wikipedia, 2026-10-29).

T against L_F(B) (AIO's ontology at work on its own cards): At 'ILO Digital Labour Platform Policy Tracker' (T1, five cards: B1–B5, B4 and B5 unreachable; 172 words) the composition gives the tracker by its homepage and its launch item. Composed from its cards: the definition at the homepage's and the launch item's grain (B1 F1, B2 F11, F12: a global overview of laws, policies, agreements and decisions on platform work, the ILO named), the coverage at the homepage grid's grain ('more than 30 countries … Australia, China, Italy, the United States': B1 F6, which lists 33 countries and all four named), the eight issues (B2 F22, 'fair pay' and 'account deactivation' added, outside the field), the audience and evidence-based policymaking (B1 F2, B2 F13, F16), the Observatory as the framework (B2 F20), and the Convention No. 193 as a related initiative (B3 F23, F24, F25), set beside the tracker and not merged. Limit dropped and force raised: the definition. The composition's first sentence says the tracker 'monitors how countries regulate platform work through legislation, collective bargaining agreements, and judicial decisions'. Its first card states judicial decisions only as the tracker's aim ('aims to provide a comprehensive overview of … judicial decisions', B1 F1) and, two sentences later on the same page, as still to come ('Currently, the tracker focuses on legislative developments worldwide …', F3; 'The tracker will further develop … the judicial decisions', F4); the own page states the same as the next phase (B6 F37). T composes the aim as present and drops both limits (CAP-1-03, CAP-1-08, CAP-1-09 carry this as the archive's finding; the field locates it on card 1 itself). Limit dropped: the European scope of the agreements (B1 F3 'publicly available in Europe'; B6 F34 'within the European Union', own page, not surfaced). Available, not composed: the launch date and the component's date (B2 F14, B6 F38, B4 F30: CAP-1-12 'No date'); the unit and its purpose of social dialogue (B2 F21, F13's 'social dialogue'); the homepage's 'Other initiatives' category and its 2026 legislation (B1 F7, F8); the twelve legal scholars (B1 F10); the context of platform work (B2 F15, F18, F17; B3 F27, F28); algorithmic management as a related topic (B3 F29); the video (B5 F31, title only). Composed without attribution: none at a source's own resolution; every body claim but the Convention carries markers to the ILO's cards, and the Convention, unmarked, is card 3's at its grain. Content replaced by use: the closer ('Would you like to explore specific country policies, legal classification rules, or algorithmic transparency guidelines tracked by the ILO?'). Not surfaced by T: the own pages B6 (the CBA item) and B7 (the Observatory, which T names but no card is) and Wikipedia (B8, no article).

v0.9 §0.5: the first diff is ontological and narrow. T and the field agree on the entity (the ILO's tracker of rules on platform work, its issues and its audience). T composes the tracker at the grain of its homepage's aim and leaves out the two sentences of the same page that say what the tracker holds now; the aim becomes the present, so that the next phase is composed as done.

L_F(B) against L_A(B ∪ A) (the intervention): Admission adds, in one claim space with the field's: the census's answer to its organizing question (LV-34), who supplies the labor, who directs it with which systems, and that its gains are not recorded as outcomes (LV-07–LV-10); the kinds of evidence and intersections (LV-04, LV-05), what the evidence can and cannot settle, not enforcement and not workers' conditions (LV-15–LV-21, LV-27), and the worked questions that use it (LV-35–LV-37); the record's reading, the layer of rules on who may direct labor, none on DSL, task-origin or user labor drag (LV-22, LV-23); the record's tags held against the field (LV-29 and LV-12, European Union, against F3 and F9, Europe; LV-14, no count, against F6); the archive's readings of the tracker's classes: law that keeps collective bargaining while containing labor (O239-01–O239-03), platform-worker-rights organizing as an institutional demand at risk of capture (O148-01, O148-02), risk to the worker and data to the platform (O713-01), value extracted from gig workers (O469-01, O469-02), gig time algorithmically governed and pay read from the face (O433-01, O713-02), ghost work paid badly (O163-01, O163-02), status reclassification as a cost (O950-01), and the archive's class category kept apart from gig workers (O1545-01); and the Capture Registry's account of the composition at the name (CAP-1-01–CAP-1-12). Not surfaced: every archive source; no card cites the census record (CAP-1-10).

alignment: {'T1_cards_claims': ['F1', 'F2', 'F3', 'F4', 'F5', 'F6', 'F7', 'F8', 'F9', 'F10', 'F11', 'F12', 'F13', 'F14', 'F15', 'F16', 'F17', 'F18', 'F19', 'F20', 'F21', 'F22', 'F23', 'F24', 'F25', 'F26', 'F27', 'F28', 'F29', 'F30', 'F31'], 'T1_composed': ['F1', 'F2', 'F6', 'F11', 'F12', 'F13', 'F16', 'F20', 'F22', 'F23', 'F24', 'F25'], 'T1_outside_cards': ["'and fair pay' (no field source: the field has 'remuneration')", "'and account deactivation' (no field source: the field has 'contract termination, including suspension')", "'algorithmic transparency guidelines' (the closer; no field source)", "'global policy database' (the field's words are 'tracker', 'database' only of the CBA component's next phase: F37)"], 'rule': "a field claim counts as composed when T states it at its source's grain or coarser; the typology of what is not is in T_vs_LB (§6.2)"}