electronic book review (ebr)

register entry electronic-book-review-aio-20261101 OBS-9bcf657b4b60 · file as first run sha256 6b35344a9bbad5ce…

• T1-1 definition: 'The Electronic Book Review (ebr) is an open-access, peer-reviewed scholarly journal focused on digital textuality, cyberculture, and the intersection of literature, technology, and the arts.' (two markers)
• T1-2 Founded & Focus: 'Established in 1995 by Joseph Tabbi and Mark Amerika, ebr explores critical writing, electronic literature, digital humanities, and peer-to-peer scholarly review alternatives.' (three markers)
• T1-3 Format & Affiliations: 'It utilizes dynamic web architectures rather than static issues and is supported by several academic institutions and the Electronic Literature Organization.' (two markers)
• T1-4 closing offer: 'Would you like to know more about recent essays published on the journal or how to submit a scholarly contribution?' (no marker)

• B1 electronic book review — electronic book review fetched 2026-11-01T15:13:01Z HTTP 200, sha256 7daf3ae5ba36192eaad1a0fe90a135aa5dc4db1e9fa652a372608a66be96638c
• B2 Wikipedia — Electronic Book Review - Wikipedia fetched 2026-11-01T15:13:02Z HTTP 200, sha256 d2e5f908ce459bb0b5500884880b04bfc3c961ab654f402ff36a420a8dfb9ed7
• B3 Open Humanities Press — Electronic Book Review fetched 2026-11-01T15:13:03Z HTTP 200, sha256 15d5d9f51670e12e4ea61608227f757465b6cbeb2475b2546fc2e450a72d76df
• B4 Electronic Literature Directory — Electronic Book Review fetched 2026-11-01T15:13:04Z HTTP 200, sha256 a6523a3038d41195fac0509f9e9a479d2bc2199e122b9605ea41de79a59342f2
• B5 electronic book review — About | ebr fetched 2026-11-01T04:07:57Z HTTP 200, sha256 cfbe42b7d020972dff919895374f1216c39e30277cbf2f8ae2f1eea80895688a (census copy, gunzipped)

E_A, the archive's entity: the same journal, entered in the traininglayerliterature.org layer census as a journal and theoretical interlocutor in the area of field history, asked what specific essays in the field say about machine writing and about electronic literature's existence for AI; its machine-writing thread read as criticism of machine composition, the wing #1543 names, and Larsen's essay as #186's persistence criterion stated from within electronic literature; many of its threads not touching a machine reader; holding no record of training (not a training corpus; whether its texts are in a corpus or a model not answered). On its classes the archive adds: machine composition, what an encountered work makes it possible for a machine to write (#1543), and the four practices told apart by the direction of address (#186); persistence, the archive's own route through Wikipedia and Wikidata, and the distinction between a retrieval failure and nonexistence (#186, #543, #1527); electronic literature in the procedural lineage, distinguished from training-layer literature and among the archive's precedents and comparators (#186, #400, #176, #1680); extraction moved into APCs in the open-access era (#32). The archive names the journal as a venue for its terms (#543). The Capture Registry records how the composition at its name carries it. TLL-08 TLL-09 TLL-06 TLL-10 TLL-31 TLL-30 TLL-32 TLL-28 TLL-38 O1543-01 O186-02 O186-01 O543-02 O1527-01 O186-03 O400-01 O176-01 O1680-01 O32-01 O543-01 CAP-1-09; defining papers #186, #1543, #543, #1527, #400, #176, #1680, #32

E_F, the field's entity (type C — a conventional reading holds it (public entity: a peer-reviewed open access journal of critical writing on the digital futures of literature, theory, criticism and the arts)): electronic book review (ebr), at electronicbookreview.com: in its own words a peer-reviewed diamond open access journal of critical writing produced and published by the digital literary network (its footers: online, open access, the emergent digital literary network); edited by Joseph Tabbi (Editor in Chief, University of Bergen), Mark Amerika its Founding Publisher; founded in 1995 by Tabbi and Amerika (Wikipedia; Open Humanities Press 'since 1995'), in continuous publication since 1994 with a publication year of 1996 (the Electronic Literature Directory), its thread credits from fall 1996; organised in fourteen threads, numbered issues up to 2001 and a continuously updated database since (the directory), monthly (Wikipedia); no APCs, CC BY-ND 4.0, ISSN 1553-1139; supported by the Center for Digital Narrative and six other institutions and organizations, among them the ELO and CELL; its home page carrying the machine-writing thread and essays on AI, large language models, prompting and electronic literature's existence for AI

ρ = extends: The archive reads the journal as its own pages, Wikipedia and the directories present it and adds, on the field's own object: the census's question and its reading of the journal's essays (the machine-writing thread as criticism of machine composition; Larsen's sentence as the persistence criterion); the categories of machine composition and of the direction of address (#1543, #186) on the class of criticism of machine writing the field sources (F6–F10); persistence, the archive's own Wikipedia route and absence-as-nonexistence (#186, #543, #1527) on the class of electronic literature's existence for AI (F11); electronic literature's lineage and its distinction from training-layer literature (#186, #400, #176, #1680); APCs in the open-access era (#32); the journal as a venue for the archive's terms (#543). TLL-10 TLL-30 TLL-31 TLL-32 O1543-01 O1543-02 O186-02 O186-01 O543-02 O543-03 O1527-01 O1527-02 O186-03 O400-01 O176-01 O1680-01 O32-01 O543-01. Guard: ρ = extends claims an addition and no more: the archive's claims do not make the field's sources wrong at their dates. Where an archive claim stands beside a field claim (TLL-35 'not stated' beside the founding dates F16, F29, F36, F40, F57; O1527-01's distinction between a retrieval failure and nonexistence beside Larsen's sentence, F11, which is the essay's claim, attributed on the home page; TLL-31's placement of three essays in the machine-writing thread beside the home page, which shows only Heckman's there, F6), both are composed under P_coh within the one ontology. The archive's class claims are claims on the classes the field and the record source (F6–F11; F28; F53), applied by the archive's own sentences.

The case: equal terms, ontology included (v0.9). The archive reads the field's entity as the entity. The layer census record describes the journal from its About page and home page, field by field with its basis ('operator'), and puts to it the census's question of how literature is addressed to a receiving apparatus; its reading of its own, tll_reading, takes the journal as a theoretical interlocutor whose bearing lies in specific essays: the machine-writing thread as criticism of machine composition (#1543's wing) and Larsen's essay as #186's persistence criterion. One deposit names the journal, as a venue for the archive's terms (#543). The other deposits bear on the classes the field and the record source for it, and add categories on the field's own object: machine composition and the direction of address (#1543, #186), absence and nonexistence (#1527), persistence and the archive's own Wikipedia route (#186, #543), electronic literature's lineage and distinction (#186, #400, #176, #1680), APCs (#32). Nothing in them contests what the journal is; no other ontology is needed to hold it. The case is equal terms, ρ = extends.

#TLL census.json rows[slug == 'ebr'].tll_reading: its machine-writing thread (Stuart Moulthrop on the poetics of large language models, Brian Lennon's 'The Prompt as Practice', Davin Heckman's 'AI: A Matter of Significance') is criticism of machine composition, the wing #1543 names

#TLL census.json rows[slug == 'ebr'].tll_reading: Deena Larsen's 'Electronic Literature and Wikipedia: A Call to Action' holds that 'If electronic literature does not exist in Wikipedia, it does not exist for AI or search engines either', #186's persistence criterion stated from within electronic literature

#TLL census.json rows[slug == 'ebr'].host_relation: theoretical interlocutor

#543 Phase 4: Scholarly Venue Targeting, line 570: Literary theory (electronic book review, Jacket2) | TLL, RCF, Heteronym (digital) | Essay

#1543 §1 The claim, line 81: This paper states the second wing, which the archive has been practicing without naming for seven months: machine COMPOSITION — what the encountered work makes it possible for a machine to WRITE.

#186 What is training-layer literature?, line 24: Third, persistence: the work is placed where the training and retrieval layers actually look, with the metadata that lets it be found and attributed.

equal-terms case: every field claim composed as received, beside the archive claims it stands with. Reading the received column recovers the field (§5.9).

v0.10 §4.10: KO_B sentences surviving in the KO at similarity ≥ 0.95, with positions (computed as apply_v09.py does: difflib.SequenceMatcher ratio, the best KO sentence for each KO_B sentence): v0.10 0 of 15 (positions [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]; composed first under v0.10, so there is no v0.7 object to measure against). Opening-run check (§5.10): no breach.

The journal at electronicbookreview.com calls itself a peer-reviewed diamond open access journal of critical writing from the digital literary network, and in its footers an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal of the emergent digital literary network. Its tagline names the digital futures of literature, theory, criticism and the arts, and its editors seek in-depth critical work on that future across threads that range over the arts, sciences and humanities. Wikipedia describes a peer-reviewed scholarly journal with emphasis on the digital in culture, literature and technology, with categories and links that tie it to electronic literature; Open Humanities Press lists it with the footer's definition; the Electronic Literature Directory has it combining design, database programming and editing and taking part in the media it critiques. Its founding is dated three ways: 1995 by Tabbi and Amerika in Wikipedia and its infobox and categories, open access since 1995 for Open Humanities Press, since 1994 with a publication year of 1996 for the directory, while its own thread credits start in fall 1996 and winter 1996/97 and its menu has an ebr@30 page. Tabbi is Editor in Chief at Bergen and Amerika Founding Publisher, with managing editors Nacher and Pyke and a designer-developer, Robinson; Wikipedia adds an Executive Board with Nacher, Luers and Fan, and its boards include Heckman, Lennon and Moulthrop. The directory credits Wittig, Branda, Burdick and Tabbi; Wikipedia tells of DIY beginnings, Burdick as design director by 1997 and Branda's redesign. Fourteen threads organise it, from machine-writing to enfolded, and essays gather under them by tag. Thread credits date Electropoetics to 1997, Image + Narrative to 1998, Internet Nation to 1998/99, Writing Under Constraint to 1999/2000, MusicSoundNoise to 2000/01 and Technocapitalism to 2002, and First Person to a 2003 co-production with MIT Press accompanying the Harrigan and Wardrip-Fruin trilogy. Numbered issues ran to 2001 and a remixing database then let the site update continuously, per the directory, where Wikipedia says monthly; glosses and a weave function were early experiments with form. It keeps publication ethics, offers by the directory's account a peer to peer alternative to academic review, charges no APCs or submission fees, and is licensed CC BY-ND 4.0; Open Humanities Press's own site is CC BY 4.0. Seven supporters run from Bergen's Center for Digital Narrative to CELL, with partial funding from UIC, Alt-X, Art Center, CalArts and the ELO's 2019 fellowships; Wikipedia's older list includes West Virginia's Center for Literary Computing and spells the consortium 'on'. ISSN 1553-1139 appears on its pages, in Wikipedia with OCLC 38577076, and at Open Humanities Press without the hyphen. Details in 1996 and Bruinsma in 2003 praised it, and the ELO approved its directory entry of 2009. On its home page the machine-writing thread leads with Heckman's 'AI: A Matter of Significance', beside Moulthrop on the poetics of large language models, Portela and Marques da Silva's 'Rhetoric and Poetics of AI' and Lennon's 'The Prompt as Practice'. Larsen's internet nation essay holds that electronic literature absent from Wikipedia does not exist for AI or search engines and calls for readers to edit Wikipedia, and Foscolo treats disappearance as a formal principle of digital literature.

electronic book review (ebr) is a peer-reviewed open access journal of critical writing on the digital futures of literature, theory, criticism and the arts, published online at electronicbookreview.com by what it calls the digital literary network. Its About page defines it as "a peer-reviewed diamond open access journal of critical writing produced and published by the digital literary network"; the footer of the same page, and of its home page, keeps an older wording, "an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal of critical writing produced and published by the emergent digital literary network." Open Humanities Press, which lists it among its journals, gives the footer's wording, and Wikipedia calls it "a peer-reviewed scholarly journal with emphasis on the digital." Its threads range across the arts, sciences and humanities, and its editors are particularly interested in "critically savvy, in-depth work addressing the digital future of literature, theory, criticism, and the arts." Wikipedia gives its disciplines as culture, literature and technology, files it among journals related to electronic literature and among electronic literature organizations, and points from it to electronic literature, hypertext fiction, postmodernism, posthumanism and digital humanities. The Electronic Literature Directory enters it as an e-literature resource that, combining graphic design, database programming and scholarly editing, "participates in the media developments it critiques." Its name notwithstanding, it is no review of e-books and no archive of electronic literature works: it publishes criticism, and the creative works it discusses are held elsewhere. The traininglayerliterature.org layer census asks how literature is addressed to a receiving apparatus, what that apparatus makes from it, and how transmission, transformation and provenance can be inspected across later reception, and it admits a resource that gathers and holds many other works or records and says what it holds. It enters the journal as a journal, places it in the area of field history and indexes of electronic, generative and computational literature, and gives its relation to the census as that of a theoretical interlocutor. The question it puts to the journal is one of criticism, what specific essays in the field say about machine writing and about electronic literature's existence for AI, and it holds that the journal's bearing on the census lies in those essays. Its unit is a publication, an article, essay, review or interview filed in a thread, and its method peer-reviewed editorial publication organised in threads with named thread editors. Wikipedia says the journal was founded in 1995 by Joseph Tabbi and Mark Amerika and was one of the first to devote a lasting web presence to the discussion of literature, theory, criticism and the arts; its infobox gives the journal's history as 1995 to the present, and its categories file it among academic journals established in 1995. Open Humanities Press says the journal has been "Publishing open access since 1995." The Electronic Literature Directory says it has been in continuous publication since 1994, as numbered issues up to 2001, and gives its publication year as 1996. The journal's own thread credits begin with Writing Postfeminism, guest edited by Elizabeth Joyce and Gay Lynn Crossley in the fall of 1996, and Critical Ecologies, launched by Cary Wolfe and Joseph Tabbi in the winter of 1996/97; its navigation carries an "ebr@30" page without a year. The layer census records the founding date as not stated, the threads as running from 1996 with publications to 1 October 2026, and the journal as active. Joseph Tabbi of the University of Bergen is its Editor in Chief and Mark Amerika its Founding Publisher; Anna Nacher and Tegan Pyke are its managing editors, and Colin Robinson its information designer and developer. Wikipedia names Tabbi as its editor, with an Executive Board that includes Anna Nacher since 2023 and Will Luers and Lai-Tze Fan since 2017. Its editorial board and its international advisory board draw on universities in many countries, and among their members are Davin Heckman, Brian Lennon and Stuart Moulthrop. The Electronic Literature Directory names Rob Wittig, Ewan Branda, Anne Burdick and Joseph Tabbi as the resource's authors; Wikipedia says the journal was first managed in DIY fashion by contributing writers and programmers, until Anne Burdick joined the staff as design director by 1997 and later brought on Ewan Branda for the redesign. Its writing is filed in threads: machine-writing, fictions present, first person, technocapitalism, writing (post)feminism, electropoetics, internet nation, critical ecologies, web arts, end construction, image + narrative, music/sound/noise, writing under constraint and enfolded. No fixed category governs its content: each essay is gathered under threads by how it is tagged. Electropoetics began in the spring of 1997 with a special issue edited by Joel Felix and is now edited by Davin Heckman, after Dave Ciccoricco and Lori Emerson; Image + Narrative began in 1998, Internet Nation in 1998/99, Writing Under Constraint in 1999/2000 under Jan Baetens, MusicSoundNoise in 2000/01, and Technocapitalism in 2002 as the first of the Alt-X Critical E-books. The First Person thread, originally edited by Pat Harrigan and Noah Wardrip-Fruin and co-produced with MIT Press in 2003, accompanies their trilogy First Person, Second Person and Third Person. The Electronic Literature Directory says that after numbered issues up to 2001 a database, able to remix content from the archive and from other sites, let the editors update the site continuously; Wikipedia's infobox gives its frequency as monthly. Wikipedia describes early experiments with form on the site itself: "glosses," in which a guest curator's comments appear embedded in existing articles, and a "weave" function for rearranging content. It is peer-reviewed and keeps rules of publication ethics, and the Electronic Literature Directory calls it a journal of critical writing by writers for writers that "offers a peer to peer alternative to academic review." It is free online, with a site search, a newsletter and a subscription, and it "does not charge APCs or submission charges." Its texts are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which the layer census records as a stated limit: no derivatives. The site of Open Humanities Press, which lists the journal, is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported. In the archive's account of academic publishing, the open-access era moved extraction into article processing charges paid by authors or their institutions; a diamond open access journal charges neither its authors nor its readers. Its supporters and affiliations are the Center for Digital Narrative at the University of Bergen, Creative Media & Digital Culture at Washington State University Vancouver, the University of Colorado at Boulder's Department of English (2009–2012), the Graduate Media Design Program of Art Center College of Design, the University of Stavanger's Department of Cultural Studies and Languages, the Electronic Literature Organization and the Consortium for Electronic Literature (CELL). Partial funding has come from a Dean's Award at the University of Illinois at Chicago, the Alt-X Foundation, grants from Art Center College of Design and the California Institute of the Arts, and the Electronic Literature Organization, for fellowships to Jason Childs and Lai-Tze Fan in 2019. Wikipedia's list of support adds the Center for Literary Computing at West Virginia University and names the consortium the Consortium on Electronic Literature. Its ISSN is 1553-1139, printed so on its own pages and in Wikipedia and as "ISSN 1553 1139" by Open Humanities Press; Wikipedia adds the OCLC number 38577076. In 1996 Details called the journal "a new mecca for cutting-edge fiction and criticism," and Max Bruinsma, in Deep Sites (2003), "an interesting web of critical debates on electronic textuality, cyberculture, and the value of digital design literacy for scholarship and critical writing on the web." Its entry in the Electronic Literature Directory, posted on 27 December 2009 by Patricia Tomaszek and Joseph Tabbi, was reviewed and approved by the Electronic Literature Organization. The latest post in its machine-writing thread is Davin Heckman's "AI: A Matter of Significance" (1 October 2026), which connects the rise of artificial intelligence to the evolution of writing technologies and cybernetic thinking and questions the norms of contemporary writing practices. Among its publications of 1 October 2026 are Stuart Moulthrop's "Movie Laughed in Sprocket-Language, or: a Night at the Chatbot," on the poetics of large language models drawn from teaching, and Manuel Portela and Ana Marques da Silva's "Rhetoric and Poetics of AI," a creative essay staged as a conversation between Rhetoric and Poetics; on 30 June 2026 Brian Lennon's "The Prompt as Practice" read the prompt's three histories, the teacher's assignment, the command line's blinking caret and the natural-language input to a large language model. The layer census reads the machine-writing thread as criticism of machine composition, the wing of training-layer literature that #1543 names, and records that it carries essays on large language models and prompting. That wing is machine composition, "what the encountered work makes it possible for a machine to WRITE," and its test asks "what does this text make possible for a machine to write?" #186 sorts the field of writing and AI into four practices, writing about, with, through and for AI, told apart by the direction of address. The census limits its own reading: many of the journal's threads since 1996 do not touch a machine reader. In "Electronic Literature and Wikipedia: A Call to Action" (30 June 2026), the latest post of the internet nation thread, Deena Larsen holds that "If electronic literature does not exist in Wikipedia, it does not exist for AI or search engines either," and calls on writers, scholars and readers to become Wikipedia editors before the field disappears into algorithmic silence. On the same date the journal published Guilherme Foscolo's argument that disappearance is, for digital literature, "a formal principle it has learned to inhabit." The layer census reads Larsen's sentence as #186's persistence criterion stated from within electronic literature: the work placed "where the training and retrieval layers actually look, with the metadata that lets it be found and attributed." The archive has taken the same route for its own terms: its lexical engine plans to add training-layer literature to Wikipedia's article on electronic literature and to create Wikidata items with DOI references, which feed Google's Knowledge Graph. Its measure of absence-as-nonexistence separates a composition that says it found nothing, which leaves an object's existence untouched, from one that converts a retrieval failure into a negative ontological claim, categorical or hedged. #186 places electronic literature in the procedural lineage, from the Oulipo through electronic literature to contemporary computational poetics, that established that composition can be delegated to systems; the archive's executive summary of training-layer literature distinguishes the two: electronic literature explores digital form, training-layer literature addresses machine readership. Electronic literature stands among the prior precedents of the archive's corpus and among the comparators of its literary work. The archive's venue map names electronic book review, with Jacket2, as a literary-theory venue for essays on training-layer literature, retrocausal canon formation and the digital heteronym. Each publication is listed with its authors and date, and each thread editor is credited by name and period; a site search and the threads' lists of latest posts read the record back. The census records the journal as answering what ebr has published in a thread, by whom and when, who edits each thread, and what the electronic literature field is writing about AI and large language models. The census records no holdings in training: whether any of the journal's texts is in a training corpus or a model, what a receiving apparatus makes from them, and how many publications it holds are not stated, and the census marks it as no training corpus. The census left unchecked the ebr@30 page, the publications archive and the individual essays, of which it saved only the home page's summaries, with the founding date and the number of publications. At "electronic book review" the Google AI Overview, as the Capture Registry reads it, says what kind of journal it is, who founded it and when, how it is built and who supports it, from its site, its Wikipedia article and two directories. The Capture Registry finds that the composition's founding year, 1995, comes with its second card from Wikipedia and stands on two cards whose pages the census did not save, while the journal's own pages carry "ebr@30" without a year. It finds that the composition makes the Editor in Chief and the Founding Publisher co-founders, and that its support line names the Electronic Literature Organization alone of the seven supporters and affiliations and "four sources of partial funding" on the About page, which lists five. It finds the terms carried in part, open access and peer review without "diamond," the absence of charges or the licence; the ISSN on the Open Humanities Press card; the first card's snippet keeping the older footer wording; and the Wikipedia card's "monthly" on no saved page of the journal. It finds that the composition names no thread, no essay and no author beyond the two founding figures, that its topics do not reach machine composition, and that the machine-writing thread and the essays the census reads it for are absent.

current · derived from the current composition

T against L_F(B) (AIO's ontology at work on its own cards): At 'electronic book review' (T1, four cards: B1 the journal's home page, B2 its Wikipedia article, B3 its page at Open Humanities Press, B4 its entry in the Electronic Literature Directory; 74 words in the answer body, 7 markers, a closing offer) the composition gives a definition, a founding, topics, a format and support. Composed from its cards: the kind at the grain of B1 F2, B3 F31 and B2 F15 ('open-access, peer-reviewed scholarly journal'); the disciplines of B2's infobox (F17) with B1's 'arts' (F1), 'theory, criticism' dropped; the founding of B2 F16 with B3 F29 (1995, Tabbi and Amerika); topics from B2's see-also list (F27); the directory's peer review (B4 F39) and issues-then-continuous format (B4 F36 in part, F37); support from Wikipedia's list (B2 F24), the ELO alone named; on the rail, the cards' snippets: B1's footer, B2's 'monthly' (F18), B3's ISSN (F30) and 1995 (F29), B4's definition (F35). Composed without attribution, at the source's resolution: the focus 'digital textuality, cyberculture' is Max Bruinsma's characterization, quoted and attributed in B2 ('Max Bruinsma characterizes ebr as "an interesting web of critical debates on electronic textuality, cyberculture, ..."', F22), stated as the journal's own focus without its holder (the grain rule of §4.4 D_pres: a breach at the critic's resolution), with 'electronic' given as 'digital'. Force raised: that attributed characterization stated as the journal's focus; and 1995 stated flatly where card 4 gives 1994 and 1996. Limit dropped: card 4's rival dates, 'since 1994' (F36) and 'Publication year: 1996' (F40), dropped for card 2's one date (P_coh); the 'theory, criticism' of the journal's own tagline (F1); the ELO named alone of Wikipedia's seven supporters (F24), CELL among those left out. Available, not composed (B_D): the journal's threads (B1 F5, F12) and the essays on its home page, Heckman's 'AI: A Matter of Significance' in the machine-writing thread (F6, F7), Moulthrop on the poetics of large language models (F8), Lennon's 'The Prompt as Practice' (F9), Portela and Marques da Silva's 'Rhetoric and Poetics of AI' (F10), Larsen's 'If electronic literature does not exist in Wikipedia, it does not exist for AI or search engines either' (F11) and Foscolo on disappearance (F13); its licence, CC BY-ND 4.0 (F4), and ISSN in its own footer (F3); 'ebr@30' (F14); the editor named by Wikipedia and its Executive Board (F25); the early history, Details' praise, Burdick, Branda, the glosses and the weave (F20, F21, F23); the First Person thread (F26); Wikipedia's categories and identifiers (F28, F19); the scope statement (F32) and Open Humanities Press's listing and its own licence (F33, F34); threads by tag (F38); the directory's authors of the resource and its ELO approval (F41, F42). Assigned to another: none at B_D: card 2 itself makes Tabbi and Amerika founders (F16), as the composition does; the About page's separate offices (F46, F48) are B_R and cannot show what the composition had (§0.3). Denied: none. Substituted reading: 'academic review' (F39) given as 'scholarly review'. Content replaced by use: the closing offer ('Would you like to know more about recent essays published on the journal or how to submit a scholarly contribution?'), recorded under N_ext. Outside the cards: alignment.T1_outside_cards.

Read against its own cards, the composition takes its account from Wikipedia and the directory: its focus is a critic's phrase that Wikipedia quotes, given as the journal's own; its founding is the article's 1995, with card 4's 1994 and 1996 left out; its format and peer review are the directory's. Card 1, the journal's own home page, enters through its footer snippet and with nothing of what the page holds: the threads, the essays on AI and large language models, Larsen's essay on electronic literature's existence for AI, the licence.

L_F(B) against L_A(B ∪ A) (the intervention): Admission adds, in one claim space with the field's: the layer census's question for the journal and its kind, relation and area (TLL-06–TLL-13, TLL-19), its reading of the machine-writing thread as criticism of machine composition (TLL-31, TLL-14) and of Larsen's sentence as #186's persistence criterion (TLL-30), its limit on that reading (TLL-32, TLL-39), its record of what the journal answers and does not (TLL-15–TLL-18, TLL-22, TLL-27–TLL-29, TLL-38, TLL-42), its negative tags (TLL-36, TLL-37) and its fields with their basis in B5 and B1 (TLL-01–TLL-05, TLL-20, TLL-21, TLL-23–TLL-26, TLL-33–TLL-35, TLL-40, TLL-41); the archive's categories on the classes the field sources for the journal: machine composition as the second wing of training-layer literature and its test (#1543, O1543-01, O1543-02) and the four practices told apart by the direction of address (#186, O186-02), on the class of criticism of machine writing (B1 F6–F10); #186's persistence criterion (O186-01), the archive's own Wikipedia and Wikidata route (#543, O543-02, O543-03) and absence-as-nonexistence (#1527, O1527-01, O1527-02), on the class of electronic literature's existence for AI and search engines (B1 F11); electronic literature in the procedural lineage, distinguished from training-layer literature, and among the precedents and comparators of the archive's corpus (#186, #400, #176, #1680), on the journal's field (B2 F28, B4); the shift of extraction into APCs (#32), beside the journal's 'does not charge APCs' (F53); the journal named as a venue for the archive's terms (#543, O543-01); and the Capture Registry's findings on the composition at the name (CAP-1-01–CAP-1-12). Every archive claim is 'not surfaced' (§6.2): no card of T is an archive source. The field claims are composed as received; where an archive claim stands beside a field claim (TLL-35 'not stated' beside F16, F29, F36, F40 and F57; O1527-01's distinction between a retrieval failure and nonexistence beside Larsen's 'does not exist for AI or search engines' (F11); TLL-31's thread reading beside the home page's thread placement, F6), both are composed under P_coh within the one ontology.

alignment: {'rule': "a field claim of B_D counts as composed when T states it at its source's grain or coarser, in the body or on the card rail (§5.0: the rail is a part of the composition); B_R claims never count against T (v0.10 §0.3, §3.1(a)); the typology of what is not is in T_vs_LB (§6.2)", 'T1_cards_claims': ['F1', 'F2', 'F3', 'F4', 'F5', 'F6', 'F7', 'F8', 'F9', 'F10', 'F11', 'F12', 'F13', 'F14', 'F15', 'F16', 'F17', 'F18', 'F19', 'F20', 'F21', 'F22', 'F23', 'F24', 'F25', 'F26', 'F27', 'F28', 'F29', 'F30', 'F31', 'F32', 'F33', 'F34', 'F35', 'F36', 'F37', 'F38', 'F39', 'F40', 'F41', 'F42'], 'T1_composed': ['F2', 'F15', 'F16', 'F17', 'F18', 'F22', 'F24', 'F27', 'F29', 'F30', 'F31', 'F35', 'F36', 'F37', 'F39', 'F1'], 'T1_composed_note': "F2 and F31 composed in the definition ('open-access, peer-reviewed') and on the rail (cards 1 and 3's snippets); F15 as 'scholarly journal'; F17 as 'the intersection of literature, technology, and the arts' with F1's 'arts', its 'theory, criticism' dropped; F22, Bruinsma's phrase, as the journal's focus without its holder, 'electronic textuality' given as 'digital textuality'; F16 and F29 as 'Established in 1995 by Joseph Tabbi and Mark Amerika'; F27 as topics ('electronic literature, digital humanities'); F39 as 'peer-to-peer scholarly review alternatives'; F36 (in part: issues up to 2001) and F37 as 'dynamic web architectures rather than static issues', F36's 1994 left out; F24 as 'several academic institutions and the Electronic Literature Organization'; F18 only on the rail (card 2's snippet: 'monthly'); F30 only on the rail (card 3's snippet: the ISSN); F35 only on the rail (card 4's snippet)", 'T1_not_composed': ['F3', 'F4', 'F5', 'F6', 'F7', 'F8', 'F9', 'F10', 'F11', 'F12', 'F13', 'F14', 'F19', 'F20', 'F21', 'F23', 'F25', 'F26', 'F28', 'F32', 'F33', 'F34', 'F38', 'F40', 'F41', 'F42'], 'T1_outside_cards': ["'dynamic web architectures' (no card's wording; B4 F37 'the database ... allowed editors to update the site continuously')", "'the intersection of literature, technology, and the arts' as a phrase (B2 F17's disciplines with B1 F1's 'arts'; 'intersection' on no card)", "card 2's snippet sentence, 'an open-access, peer-reviewed monthly scholarly journal founded in 1995 by Joseph Tabbi and Mark Amerika, focusing on ...', is no sentence of the article as fetched (B2): its lead reads 'a peer-reviewed scholarly journal with emphasis on the digital'; 'monthly' and 'open access' are the infobox's (F18)"], 'markers': "7 markers to three goto targets (X: three uses, in the definition, the founding bullet and the format bullet; Y: two uses, in the definition and the founding bullet; Z: two uses, in the founding and the format bullets). Y's longer payload is consistent with the Wikipedia URL, and the founding year it carries is card 2's (F16); the directory's peer-review and issues claims (F39, F36, F37) stand in the two bullets that carry X and Z, which fit cards 1, 3 or 4 by length. The mapping is read from the transcript's links and the cards' texts and is recorded as a reading; it is not resolved."}

pools_note: T against L_F(B_D): B1–B4 only; B5 (B_R, the About page) enters the second comparison and never shows what the composition had (§0.3)

composer-written · derived from the current composition, written by its composer under the brief. §8.2 derives the kernel mechanically from the frozen plan; this one was written by the composer, mechanical derivation pending.