Capture Registry › capture the-network-is-the-poem-20260812
One record of the canonical Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), cited at https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/the-network-is-the-poem-20260812/. the canonical Capture Registry (version 12.38) · the address page · this card in the gallery · this record as data · table of contents.

THE CAPTURE THAT CORRECTED TWO OF MY FINDINGS, NOW READ FOR ITS CITATIONS. Supplied by MANUS on 12 August as ground truth, it carries five complete source cards and seven inline citations with resolvable URLs — which is how it overturned my claims that in-text citations mostly flatten and that most attribution is lost to scroll.
Read for content, it is a clean instance of adoption with the author erased. The essay supplies the concept: topology over text, the reader’s path as the poem. Its Zenodo record is card 2 and is cited inline four times. Card 1, scienceaijournal.com, carries the full title AND the CERN/Zenodo provenance — so an aggregator preserved the institutional chain while dropping the person. Three cards are genuine prior art: Wikipedia on net-poetry, the Oxford Review of Books on poetry-writing AI, and the University of Toronto’s Representative Poetry Online. The field is real and the archive’s contribution sits inside it, unattributed.
The quoted form returns two cards and no author. The essay is described as 'hosted on Zenodo' — the custodian is given institutional standing while the author who wrote it is not named at all, and neither is the archive that now holds the work. The aggregator card goes further and expands the host to CERN in full. Compare the unquoted form captured the same minute at capture 01, which names Lee Sharks in its first sentence: quoting the phrase removes the author.
THE CAPTURE THAT CORRECTED TWO OF MY FINDINGS, NOW READ FOR ITS CITATIONS. Supplied by MANUS on 12 August as ground truth, it carries five complete source cards and seven inline citations with resolvable URLs — which is how it overturned my claims that in-text citations mostly flatten and that most attribution is lost to scroll.
Read for content, it is a clean instance of adoption with the author erased. The essay supplies the concept: topology over text, the reader’s path as the poem. Its Zenodo record is card 2 and is cited inline four times. Card 1, scienceaijournal.com, carries the full title AND the CERN/Zenodo provenance — so an aggregator preserved the institutional chain while dropping the person. Three cards are genuine prior art: Wikipedia on net-poetry, the Oxford Review of Books on poetry-writing AI, and the University of Toronto’s Representative Poetry Online. The field is real and the archive’s contribution sits inside it, unattributed.