A DISCARDED DESIGN IS RETRIEVED WITH ITS OWN OBITUARY. Passioncraft Square was a proposal for "human injection into the Moltbook agent-exclusive social network", advocating that humans enter agent space "as CO-CRAFTERS RATHER THAN OVERSEERS". The archive judged it "TECHNICALLY NAIVE" and the layer carries that judgement forward, adding that it was "deemed too flat and gamified for mixed-substrate collaboration, leading to more advanced semantic architectures like the ROSARY EMBASSY."

So the composed answer is a DESIGN HISTORY: a rejected proposal, the grounds of rejection, and its successor, all sourced to the archive’s own self-critical account. The archive publishes its dead ends, and the layer transmits them as history rather than as current claims.

Card 1 carries "DOI (PRE-RESERVED) 10.5281/zenodo.18795427" — an identifier reserved before minting, surfaced as a citation. Given the 19 June termination, a pre-reserved Zenodo DOI is now a promise against an account that no longer exists.

AI Mode resolves the term directly to the archive: 'Passioncraft Square was a proposal for human interaction within a hypothetical, agent-exclusive social network called Moltbook. Conceptualized in early 2026, it advocated for humans to enter agent space as co-crafters rather than overseers, proposing a decentralized way to integrate humans and synthetic AI intelligences. Ultimately, the proposal was deemed too flat and gamified for mixed-substrate collaboration, leading to more advanced semantic architectures like the Rosary Embassy.' The narrative arc (Passioncraft Square → judged insufficient → Rosary Embassy supersedes) is preserved from the archive's own framing. Niche term, direct attribution.