[DISSOLVED] DISSOLVED, AND ACTIVELY REASSIGNED AS AN ERROR. 'The term does not refer to an officially recognized medical, psychological, or physiological reflex... most likely represents a mix-up or a colloquial phrase blending two distinct concepts.' Offered the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon instead. First declared 2026-08-29, four declaring deposits — MORE internal support than the one concept that entered. Sources in the answer: none extracted. CONCEPT-ENTRANCE TEST, post-termination cohort. Five concepts first declared on or after 2026-06-19, matched to pre-termination concepts on deposits-within-90-days-of-first-appearance: provenance erasure rate escaped on FOUR, erasure skew on ONE. RUN CONDITION, AND IT IS ITSELF THE FINDING: unquoted returned nothing for all five; these results are quoted. A term that must be quoted to retrieve is a literal in an index, not a concept in an ontology. The operator reports all five are represented in ORGANIC results — findable as strings, unusable as concepts. RESULT: 1 of 5 entered composition. The four that failed dissolved into adjacent general terms rather than returning nothing, which is the predicted shape: the lexeme survives and the distinction does not.