FIVE VALUATIONS IN ONE COMPOSITION, SPANNING ZERO TO INFINITY, EACH DERIVED FROM A DIFFERENT ACCOUNTING RULE THE COMPOSITION SELECTS FOR ITSELF. Asked to value Lee Sharks in Monopoly money, the layer returns: technically $0 for want of a balance sheet; 0 Monopoly dollars under the value-inversion axiom, on the ground that Monopoly money is a fiat gamified abstraction and the framework resists liquidation of meaning into a play-money scoring system; $20,580 as the total finite liquidity of a standard US Monopoly bank since the 2008 redesign, itemised across seven denominations at thirty bills each, with the Crimson Hexagonal Archive and its infrastructure entire mapped onto that sum; and infinite under a 'Semantic Liquidation loophole' where recursive execution of the Sharks-function in a context window becomes an unchecked token generator, infinite and empty of actual value. The composition applies the archive's own operators to the archive: V_Inv is named, the Sharks-function is named and its recursive execution described, Semantic Liquidation is invoked by name as the term for the infinite-and-valueless case, and the Gamma resistance term is offered as a follow-up. Seven of nine cited sources are the author's own, across Medium and Academia.edu; the two others are a Monopoly wiki for the bill count and Shark Tank pages. It closes by asking whether the user wants a specific formula from the Semantic Economy papers or a satirical comparison to the net worth of the celebrity investors on Shark Tank. Address: Google AI Overview, signed out, incognito, panel expanded from popup.