Database of AI Litigation

Sharks, Lee

SPXI instrument · method 0.9 of 87, level 0 (Measurement): Capture Registry (longitudinal observation). An instrument of SPXI, the Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing; the whole practice is itemized at spxi.dev/methods.

Capture Registry › capture database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101

One record of the canonical Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), cited at https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/. the canonical Capture Registry (version 12.518) · the address page · this card in the gallery · this record as data · table of contents.

AXN:0B90.CAPTURE — this address. Each observation below is one AXN, sealed with its analysis and measures; the identifier names the reading together with the response it reads.
AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.🔼🕕🔼🌗⚖️🛸 — Google AI Overview, 2026-11-01 · sealed observation (SHA-256 d467d406365e46e5…)

Related deposits: #940 EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction · #1722 AI Calls You Fake: The Existence Tax on Real People and Real Work

Machine Reception2026-11-01

Database of AI Litigation

Originator: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation · outside the archive (out-universe) · site · SPXI treatment: partial

BROAD MATCH

no
image

THE NAME, SIGNED OUT, 2026-11-01: 'The primary dedicated public resources and trackers for artificial intelligence litigation include:' Four bullets: 'DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation: Maintained by George Washington University Law School's Ethical Tech Initiative, this resource covers ongoing and completed AI-related cases starting from the initial complaint onward—regardless of whether they produce published decisions.'; Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases Database; Fisher Phillips's AI Litigation Tracker; Hogan Lovells's case law tracker. Five cards: GW Blogs, Fisher Phillips, Damien Charlotin, etidail.com, Hogan Lovells Cadwalader.

Full record — 5,090 characters, 5 sources

Capture record

captured: 2026-11-01
surface: Google AI Overview
auth state: signed out, incognito
evidence class: paste
PER (dimensional, rubric v1.1): PER 0.00 · M 0.00 · C 0.00 · D —
PER (historical scalar): 0.5
PER units retained: inst, src
citations read: 5
observation id: OBS-67539a81c4ed
address id: ADDR-c15fe760095a

Reading

The innocent reading first. Given the database's descriptive name, the Overview reads it as a kind, lists four trackers of AI litigation with DAIL first, and asks for a legal area or jurisdiction.

Findings

DAIL FIRST OF FOUR. The composition treats the name as a category, 'The primary dedicated public resources and trackers for artificial intelligence litigation', and gives DAIL the first bullet; the three others are a hallucination-sanctions database, a law firm's U.S. tracker 'since February 2021' and a law firm's global tracker.
THE METHOD AT ITS GRAIN. 'covers ongoing and completed AI-related cases starting from the initial complaint onward—regardless of whether they produce published decisions.' The page: 'The Database of AI Litigation presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence and related topics. It covers cases from complaint forward - as soon as we learn of them - whether or not they generate published decisions.'
THE HOST AND A SECOND ADDRESS. 'George Washington University Law School's Ethical Tech Initiative': the saved page names the Initiative ('DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative'), describes it as 'an interdisciplinary collaboration: where law and ethics meet computer science and engineering, media and public affairs, and social entrepreneurship', and carries GW's footer ('Contact GW'); 'Law School' is on no saved page. The fourth card is a second site under the database's name, etidail.com ('DAIL - the Database of AI Litigation This database presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence, including mach...'); the census row records only the GW Blogs address.
THE SCOPE NOT CARRIED. 'It is intended to be broad in scope, covering everything from algorithms used in hiring and credit and criminal sentencing decisions to generative AI training and AI companion liability.', 'A companion database of issued opinions is available here .' and 'While still under development, it will continue to expand over time.' are not in the composition. The census reads DAIL for whatever authorship cases it holds and finds none on the saved page; the composition's closing names copyright as one area the user might choose.

Analysis analyst prose, not machine text

DAIL composed accurately as one tracker among four, its method in near paraphrase of its own sentence and its host named with a school the saved page does not name. Its scope and companion database of opinions are absent, and a second domain under its name is carded.

Machine text, verbatim

CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD — paste of the Overview expanded, with its source cards · complete as supplied · READ IN FULL 2026-11-01

[Google AI Overview at the query, signed out and incognito (operator defaults of 2026-10-01 and 2026-10-14). The paste is the Overview expanded (the 'AI Mode Conversation' view).] The 'You said' line carries the query twice, run together, and is given once here. Inline links are Google redirect URLs, kept as pasted. [QUERENT] Database of AI Litigation [SYSTEM] The primary dedicated public resources and trackers for artificial intelligence litigation include: * DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation: Maintained by George Washington University Law School's Ethical Tech Initiative, this resource covers ongoing and completed AI-related cases starting from the initial complaint onward—regardless of whether they produce published decisions. You can explore it via the [DAIL Database](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESTAHrOzAVqJI0fBBbiOeSjSAPTkgMdIlDzAyFZW7uNkwGp0f72XJwEAuMNRRd3E37CxbRM1rQ_erHFi36b1qXsABkFFN0Cvzl2I3_5U8). [[1], [2]] * AI Hallucination Cases Database: Created by Damien Charlotin, this specialized tracker logs judicial decisions and sanctions where parties or counsel relied on generative AI-fabricated case law or hallucinations. You can review records at the [AI Hallucination Cases Database](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESZwHrOzAVsKDxl0WXSELJm1X-TqVTxbO37zmVO5hGRlxTbyib-15gFkhEq9YxRlSPgHL8xyv3yGXaXaRyTkPAX-y2lRhChHOEh-6RAa3pIfUSJCNN644352hTjE-aZ3zmhaQrr7Dg6Kg). [1] * AI Litigation Tracker (Fisher Phillips): A U.S.-focused tracker covering employment, resume screeners, electronic monitoring, and GenAI litigation filed across all 50 states since February 2021. Access it on the [Fisher Phillips AI Tracker](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESmgEB6zswFQCYwJtFp0yA_yc2RkC_FKdTDtbZDIA-5Af2_21kYKdyulgyBRjRjOUwJZQD7JszvGEZdWk4so3fxQ25w6l8UIbm6mo7p30AjUVsHIxbjivhdpVZ7__wCaEMfYR7c6agRCMztC1HiqIn45ackzgoEIVZSRPgbDFH-Jwka6uZwRfgX58FzffSAYBYYhy_Qb4oez_lFQ-I). [1] * AI Litigation Case Law Tracker (Hogan Lovells): A global tracker monitoring international AI cases spanning copyright, IP, data privacy, and commercial disputes. [1] If you are looking for cases in a specific legal area (such as copyright, employment discrimination, or AI hallucinations) or a particular jurisdiction, let me know and I can point you to the most relevant tracker. The George Washington University

Sources (5) as cited, and as the copy produced them

The George Washington University third_party
DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs
DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation. The Database of AI Litigation presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligenc...
as pastedDAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation. The Database of AI Litigation presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligenc... Fisher Phillips LLP
Fisher Phillips LLP third_party
AI Litigation Tracker | Fisher Phillips LLP
The AI Litigation Tracker provides a comprehensive view of litigation matters filed across all 50 states that involve the use of AI technologies, such as Gen AI...
as pastedAI Litigation Tracker | Fisher Phillips LLP The AI Litigation Tracker provides a comprehensive view of litigation matters filed across all 50 states that involve the use of AI technologies, such as Gen AI... Damien Charlotin
Damien Charlotin third_party
AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin
AI Hallucination Cases This database tracks legal decisions 1 Notably, this does not cover mere allegations of hallucinations, but only cases where the court or...
as pastedAI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases This database tracks legal decisions 1 Notably, this does not cover mere allegations of hallucinations, but only cases where the court or... etidail.com
etidail.com third_party
DAIL – the Database of AI Litigation
DAIL - the Database of AI Litigation This database presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence, including mach...
a second address under the database's name, not in the census row
as pastedDAIL – the Database of AI Litigation DAIL - the Database of AI Litigation This database presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence, including mach... Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader third_party
AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
AI Litigation Case Law Tracker Explore our global digital solution for monitoring AI-related cases across key jurisdictions. Visit the AI Hub Generate report My...
as pastedAI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader AI Litigation Case Law Tracker Explore our global digital solution for monitoring AI-related cases across key jurisdictions. Visit the AI Hub Generate report My... AI responses may include mistakes. For legal advice, consult a professional. [Learn more](https://support.google.com/websearch?p=ai_overviews)

↻ Re-run permalink