Google Scholar's 'cited by' surface for Paper 1 of the trilogy renders the companion structure without loss. Two results shown, both attributed to 'L Sharks - godkinggoogle.com' with [PDF] direct-download links: (1) 'Retrievability as the Me[dium of] Existence' (title truncated by the PDF-link overlay in mobile Scholar layout — this is Paper 2 of the trilogy, 'Retrievability as the Medium of Existence'), (2) 'Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol' (Paper 3 of the trilogy). Scholar has stitched the trilogy into a working paper cluster on the strength of the companion-reference language in each paper's own text, not on external metadata: the Reception Apparatus snippet contains 'diagnosed in the companion paper ChatGPT Psychosis...' verbatim. The Retrievability abstract-as-snippet presents the paper's thesis sentence directly: 'This paper argues that retrievability—the capacity to be surfaced by the systems through which human beings find information—has become, under contemporary conditions, the...' — no hedging, no framing qualifiers. Author attribution consistent ('L Sharks'); no name-collapse toward Mary Lee or other high-frequency namesakes. godkinggoogle.com — a surface authored to critique the reception layer — is being read by Scholar as an academic hosting venue adjacent to whatever primary repository the trilogy is deposited on. This is the apparatus receiving apparatus: a critique of the summarizer regime, indexed and cross-referenced by Google Scholar under the author's canonical name, with its internal companion-reference structure carried across the snippet boundary. No failure modes observed on this capture.