Ontological Economy extends the Semantic Economy line from the ownership of information to the power to decide what publicly exists as what. Its object is the entity as a structured whole — name, identity, relations, provenance, function, history and correctability — and the ways AI-mediated search can alter that whole while deleting nothing: returning one entity under another's name, keeping a concept while moving its authorship, keeping pages while severing the relations that make them findable. The paper names two categories within this economy. Ontological discrimination is patterned unequal treatment in how entities are preserved, resolved and corrected; ontology laundering is the conversion of governance decisions into what reads as neutral fact. Because outside observers cannot tell which internal mechanism produced a substitution, the paper argues that the provider, who alone holds graph histories, policy traces and evaluator states, must bear the burden of producing that evidence once a reproducible defect is shown. Recurrence after notice becomes repair debt, and the corrective labor pushed onto the misrepresented party is priced by a mirror wage taken from the provider's own published pay bands. Its specimen is the derived shadow referent at the Crimson Hexagonal Archive. Its primary recourse is graph-native: public evidence accumulates until the system's own retrieval holds up a mirror to its ontology, with appeal, notice and legal routes treated as secondary.