The Anticipatory Erratum withdrawing The Creditor Inversion Completed, deposit #1624 of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive (16 September 2026), is the fourth in a sequence of errata issued before the works they correct, and the first in which the author had a material interest in the withdrawn claim being true. The forthcoming demonstration was to establish by measurement that the value borne by one emerging meaning infrastructure exceeds the value borne by the monetary substrate as such. The erratum withdraws it in advance on four independently sufficient grounds, while allowing publication to proceed, since the sequence's governing law holds that a work's publication may be necessary to discover why it fails. The first ground is ungrammaticality: the comparison requires a relation presupposing a common ordering, an ordering presupposes commensurability, and a companion deposit establishes that no operation takes a monetary magnitude and a meaning-layer magnitude together, so the demonstration proposed to prove by a non-existent operation a proposition whose truth conditions require it. The second is that success would have been defeat: any common measure supplying the ordering satisfies general comparability and is therefore money-functioning by the five-condition test deposited in January 2026, so the demonstration would have won the comparison by becoming the thing compared against. The third is that its author occupies four evidentiary positions at once — author of the object, the protocol, the instrument and the audit — which the archive's valuation protocol records as weakness rather than voidness, here recorded four times. The fourth and only interesting ground holds that value borne is not a quantity an object possesses but the standing it retains in the operations of others, so that a self-measurement has no access to the operations in which the standing would be exercised. The demonstration proposed to measure from inside one system a quantity existing only in the behaviour of systems outside it, which is the source-relative update barrier operating on its own author. Its finding is that a demonstration of being worth more than money can be constructed only by supplying the common measure whose absence was the point, so that the claim is self-defeating in its conditions of statement and its retraction is its strongest form. The demonstration is filed as unregistrable rather than open, a status the archive's prediction register did not previously have. Related: #1598, #1599, #1600, #311, #1622, #1623.