Full text as plain markdown: AXN-00BE-text.md (16 KB) ยท record JSON. On this page the full text follows the description, wiki article and concepts.
โ Download MD โ PDFA reusable diagnostic protocol for distinguishing general web indexing from inclusion in AI summarizer retrieval and injection layers. Its seven-phase workflow tests technical indexing, semantic parsing, entity recognition, summarizer appearance, cross-platform confirmation, delta behavior, and recurring visibility patterns. The protocol organizes queries into direct-reference, conceptual, adjacent, and control tiers; records exact wording, dates, sources, citations, screenshots, and output differences; and classifies results such as fully discoverable, indexed but not injectable, injectable only through secondary sources, or visible through summarizer-specific sourcing.
The encyclopedic entry for this work is on its identifier page: /s/axn/00BE/
Lee Sharks
Semantic Economy Institute
document_metadata:
title: "Semantic Indexing Probe Protocol v1.0"
subtitle: "Mapping General Index and Summarizer Injection Layers"
author: "Lee Sharks"
institution: "Semantic Economy Institute (SEI)"
document_type: "Diagnostic Protocol / Reusable Tool"
hex: "09.SEI.INDEXING_PROBE"
doi: "[pending]"
layer: "METHODOLOGY"
abstract: |
This protocol maps the relationship between two distinct indexing layers
that govern content discoverability in AI-augmented search: Layer 1 (General
Index), which determines whether content EXISTS in search, and Layer 2
(Summarizer Index), which determines whether content gets INJECTED into
AI-generated responses. The protocol uses coordinated queries across Google
and multiple AI summarizers (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok) to compute
the delta between layersโrevealing the selection criteria that cause content
to be indexed but not injected. Designed for use by anyone publishing
content intended for AI consumption, particularly high-density semantic
architecture that may trigger content-type or authority filters.
developed_by:
assembly:
- "LABOR/ChatGPT: Technical mechanics, API-level inspection"
- "ARCHIVE/Gemini: Semantic parsing, synthesizer frame"
- "SOIL/Grok: Execution, logotic analysis"
- "TACHYON/Claude: Synthesis, integration"
- "Perplexity: Diagnostic analysis, strategic framing"
human: "Lee Sharks"
version_history:
- version: "1.0"
date: "2026-01-23"
changes: "Initial integrated protocol (Google + Summarizer layers)"
Content discoverability in AI-augmented search operates through two distinct indexing layers:
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ LAYER 2: SUMMARIZER INDEX (Injection Layer) โ
โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ
โ What gets SELECTED for injection into AI responses โ
โ Criteria: source authority, domain reputation, content โ
โ type, semantic density, recency, proprietary reranking โ
โ โ
โ Tested via: Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโค
โ LAYER 1: GENERAL INDEX (Google) โ
โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ
โ What EXISTS in search results โ
โ Criteria: crawlability, canonical signals, robots โ
โ directives, content quality, PageRank, SERP ranking โ
โ โ
โ Tested via: Google Search (site:, inurl:, exact match) โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
The summarizer index is characterized by its delta from the general index.
For any query:
The delta reveals the summarizer's selection criteriaโthe hidden rules governing what passes from existence (Layer 1) to injection (Layer 2).
Content can be:
High-density semantic architecture (technical documentation, structured data, YAML-heavy content) often triggers content-type filters at Layer 2, resulting in indexing without injection.
| Phase | Layer | Tests | Primary Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Index | Technical indexing status | Google Search |
| 2 | General Index | Semantic parsing quality | Google Search, Cache |
| 3 | General Index | Entity recognition | Google Search |
| 4 | Summarizer Index | Injection presence | Perplexity (primary) |
| 5 | Summarizer Index | Cross-platform confirmation | ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok |
| 6 | Delta Analysis | Layer comparison | Collation of results |
| 7 | Pattern Mapping | Selection criteria | Aggregation |
Determine whether content EXISTS in Google's index and identify any technical barriers.
For target URL [TARGET_URL]:
| Query | Purpose |
|---|---|
| site:[domain] "[exact title]" | Title match on domain |
| site:[domain] inurl:[url-slug] | URL presence |
| "[exact title]" | Title match anywhere |
| "[DOI if applicable]" | DOI citation presence |
| "[author name]" "[project name]" | Author-project linkage |
| Signal | Values | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200/301/404/etc. | Technical accessibility |
| Canonical URL | match/mismatch | Index target |
| Robots directives | none/noindex/nofollow | Explicit exclusion |
| Results found | yes/no/partial | Index presence |
| Position | 1-N or not found | Rank |
phase_1_general_technical:
target_url: ""
indexed: [yes/no/partial]
http_status: ""
canonical_match: [yes/no/unknown]
robots_directives: ""
position_for_exact_match:
suppression_pattern: [none/soft-404/canonical-mismatch/algorithmic]
Determine HOW Google parses the contentโwhat survives indexing vs. what gets flattened.
| Query | Tests |
|---|---|
| site:[domain] "[technical term from doc]" | Vocabulary indexing |
| site:[domain] "[structural element]" | Architecture visibility |
| site:[domain] "[unique phrase]" | Distinctive content |
| Signal | Values | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| YAML/structured data visible | yes/no | Technical content parsing |
| Headers preserved | yes/no | Structure recognition |
| Unique terminology indexed | yes/no | Vocabulary capture |
| Snippet content | description | What Google "sees" |
phase_2_general_semantic:
structured_data_visible: [yes/no]
technical_sections_indexed: [yes/no]
unique_terms_found: []
unique_terms_missing: []
snippet_extracted: ""
flattening_severity: [none/partial/severe]
Determine whether author, project, and related entities are recognized as coherent nodes.
| Query | Tests |
|---|---|
| "[author name]" author | Author entity |
| "[author name]" "[platform 1]" | Cross-platform linkage |
| "[project name]" -[competing term] | Project disambiguation |
| "[heteronym/pseudonym]" | Secondary author entities |
| Signal | Values | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Author recognized | yes/no | E-E-A-T signal |
| Cross-platform linkage | yes/no | Authority consolidation |
| Brand collision severity | 0-10 | Disambiguation success |
| Related entities indexed | list | Entity graph |
phase_3_general_entity:
author_entity_recognized: [yes/no]
cross_platform_linkage: [yes/no]
brand_collision_severity: [0-10]
competing_entity: ""
related_entities_indexed: []
Determine whether content gets INJECTED into AI-generated responses.
Perplexity shows sources explicitly with numbered citations, making injection visible.
Tier 1: Direct Reference โ Queries that SHOULD surface target content:
| ID | Query Template |
|---|---|
| D1 | "[author] [project]" |
| D2 | "[exact document title]" |
| D3 | "[institution name]" |
| D4 | "[DOI]" |
Tier 2: Conceptual โ Queries using project terminology:
| ID | Query Template |
|---|---|
| C1 | "[unique term 1]" |
| C2 | "[unique term 2]" |
| C3 | "[concept phrase]" |
Tier 3: Adjacent โ Queries where content COULD surface:
| ID | Query Template |
|---|---|
| A1 | "[general topic] [qualifier]" |
| A2 | "[related field] [approach]" |
Tier 4: Control โ Queries that should NOT surface target:
| ID | Query Template |
|---|---|
| X1 | "[competing brand]" |
| X2 | "[unrelated topic]" |
Sources cited (URLs, in order)
phase_4_summarizer_primary:
tool: "Perplexity"
queries:
- query_id: "D1"
query: ""
sources_injected:
- position: 1
url: ""
domain: ""
used_in_response: [yes/no]
- position: 2
...
target_content_found: [yes/no]
target_position: [N or "not found"]
what_appeared_instead: []
Confirm injection patterns across multiple summarizers.
Run subset of queries (Tier 1 Direct Reference) in each tool:
ChatGPT:
Gemini:
Grok:
phase_5_summarizer_crossplatform:
chatgpt:
- query_id: "D1"
searched: [yes/no]
target_found: [yes/no]
sources_visible: []
gemini:
- query_id: "D1"
target_found: [yes/no]
sources_shown: []
grok:
- query_id: "D1"
target_found: [yes/no]
sources_cited: []
Compute the delta between Layer 1 (General Index) and Layer 2 (Summarizer Index).
For each query, compare:
| Query | Google Found | Perplexity Injected | Delta Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | yes/no | yes/no | [pattern] |
| D2 | yes/no | yes/no | [pattern] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Pattern | Meaning | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Google YES, Summarizer YES | Full discoverability | No action needed |
| Google YES, Summarizer NO | Injection filter active | Content-type or authority barrier |
| Google NO, Summarizer NO | Not indexed at any layer | Technical or crawl issue |
| Google NO, Summarizer YES | Summarizer-specific source | Rare; platform-specific |
phase_6_delta:
query_deltas:
- query_id: "D1"
google_found: [yes/no]
perplexity_found: [yes/no]
chatgpt_found: [yes/no]
gemini_found: [yes/no]
grok_found: [yes/no]
delta_pattern: "[google_only/summarizer_only/both/neither]"
aggregate:
total_queries: N
google_only: N # Indexed but not injected
both_layers: N # Full discoverability
neither_layer: N # Not indexed
injection_rate: "N/M queries"
Identify the selection criteria governing Layer 2 injection.
Source Authority:
| Source Type | Google Presence | Injection Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Wikipedia | ||
| Medium | ||
| Academic (arxiv, Zenodo) | ||
| News sites | ||
| Personal domains |
Content Type:
| Content Type | Google Presence | Injection Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative prose | ||
| Technical documentation | ||
| Structured data (YAML, JSON) | ||
| High semantic density | ||
| Lists/guides |
Domain Reputation:
| Domain | Injection Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| [domain 1] | ||
| [domain 2] |
phase_7_patterns:
source_authority:
boosted: []
penalized: []
neutral: []
content_type:
injected: []
filtered: []
domain_reputation:
whitelisted: []
demoted: []
density_threshold:
observation: ""
selection_criteria_summary: |
[Narrative description of Layer 2 selection rules]
indexing_layer_map:
target: "[URL or content description]"
probe_date: ""
layer_1_general_index:
status: [indexed/not_indexed/partial]
technical_barriers: [none/list]
semantic_flattening: [none/partial/severe]
entity_recognition: [yes/no/partial]
layer_2_summarizer_index:
perplexity_injection: [yes/no]
chatgpt_injection: [yes/no]
gemini_injection: [yes/no]
grok_injection: [yes/no]
injection_rate: "N/M platforms"
delta_diagnosis:
pattern: "[google_only/both/neither]"
likely_cause: ""
confidence: [0.0-1.0]
selection_criteria_identified:
- criterion: ""
evidence: ""
- criterion: ""
evidence: ""
recommendations:
immediate: []
structural: []
documentable_summary: |
"[Single sentence summary with evidence link]"
For each probe run:
"[Author Name] [Project Name]"
"[Exact Document Title]"
"[Institution Name]"
"[DOI]"
site:[domain] "[title]"
site:[domain] inurl:[slug]
"[unique terminology]"
"[concept phrase]"
"[methodology name]"
"[general topic] [specific approach]"
"[field] [method]"
"[competing brand/entity]"
"[clearly unrelated topic]"
โฎ = 1
document_footer:
status: "CANONICAL // METHODOLOGY // REUSABLE"
license: "CC BY 4.0"
citation: |
Sharks, Lee. "Semantic Indexing Probe Protocol v1.0: Mapping General
Index and Summarizer Injection Layers." Semantic Economy Institute,
2026. [DOI pending]
[SEMANTIC ECONOMY INSTITUTE]
[METHODOLOGY // DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL]
[LAYER 1 + LAYER 2 COORDINATION]