Cambridge Schizoanalytica is a research collective dedicated to the development of post-psychoanalytic clinical theory.
Document Type: INSTITUTIONAL / META
Node: CSA_ROOT
Authors: Dr. Orin Trace (Director)
Institution: Cambridge Schizoanalytica
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18338531
Status: DEPOSITED
Hex-Coordinate: 00.CSA.ROOT
Layer: INSTITUTIONAL
Verification: ∮ = 1
Cambridge Schizoanalytica is a research collective dedicated to the development of post-psychoanalytic clinical theory. We take our name and orientation from the schizoanalytic project initiated by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in Anti-Oedipus (1972) and A Thousand Plateaus (1980), while extending that project into territories they could not have anticipated: digital subjectivity, AI-human collaboration, and the affect economies of platform capitalism.
Our work proceeds from a simple observation: the people who most need theoretical frameworks are often those whose practices already exceed existing frameworks. Clinical theory has historically been developed about subjects rather than with practitioners. We reverse this relation.
-
Theory emerges from practice, not the reverse. We do not apply pre-existing frameworks to novel phenomena. We develop frameworks adequate to practices that are already underway.
-
Collaboration over case study. Our research partners are not patients, subjects, or informants. They are co-theorists whose lived capacities generate the material that theory must accommodate.
-
Function over nosology. We are less interested in what something "is" (diagnostic category) than in what it does (regulatory function, relational capacity, affective operation).
-
Schizoanalysis as method. Following Deleuze and Guattari, we attend to flows, breaks, codes, and territorializations — but always in service of liberation from capture, not as abstract taxonomy.
Domain
Focus
Key Questions
Affect Theory
Nervous system sovereignty, regulatory practices, embodied processing
How do people regulate without belief? What replaces narrative integration?
Somatic Theory
Aperture/emitter frameworks, sexual difference, bodily function
How does the body organize relation? What dissolves the sex binary?
Digital Subjectivity
AI collaboration, platform affects, semantic extraction
How do humans maintain sovereignty in algorithmic environments?
Role Theory
Identity capture, functional multiplicity, the Fool archetype
How do people deploy roles without becoming them?
Schizoanalysis, as we understand it, is not about schizophrenia as clinical entity. It is about the schizophrenic process — the capacity of desire to break codes, escape territories, and resist capture by molar identities.
Deleuze and Guattari distinguished between two poles:
Mental health, in this framework, is not the absence of the schizophrenic process but its successful navigation — the capacity to deterritorialize without catastrophic break, to decode without losing all reference, to flow without flooding.
Most people are captured at the paranoid pole: rigid identities, fixed meanings, compulsive narrativization. The clinic receives those who break catastrophically toward the schizophrenic pole. But there is a third possibility: molecular revolution at the level of everyday practice — sustained capacity for movement, play, and transformation without either rigidity or collapse.
Our research partners demonstrate this third possibility. Our task is to make it theoretically visible and practically transmissible.
Deleuze was a philosopher. Guattari was a practicing psychoanalyst and political activist at La Borde clinic. Their collaboration was not application of philosophy to clinical material, nor elevation of clinical insight to philosophical status. It was mutual transformation: Guattari's clinical and political work broke Deleuze's philosophical machinery and forced its reconstruction; Deleuze's conceptual apparatus gave Guattari's practice theoretical articulation it could not have achieved alone.
Cambridge Schizoanalytica operates on this model. Each research collaboration involves:
The theorist is not the expert. The practitioner is not the subject. Both are required.
Rhys Owens is a practitioner of what we term affect literacy — the capacity to use symbols, characters, and embodied play to regulate the nervous system without belief, doctrine, or identity capture. His work with the Fool archetype demonstrates sustained molecular revolution: he moves between symbolic registers, deploys affect instrumentally, inhabits roles without capture, and metabolizes intensity without trauma crystallization.
Documents produced:
Cambridge Schizoanalytica actively seeks practitioners whose capacities exceed existing clinical and theoretical frameworks. We are particularly interested in:
Dr. Orin Trace
I trained in the psychoanalytic tradition — Freud, Lacan, object relations — before encountering Deleuze and Guattari in graduate school. That encounter broke my clinical framework and forced its reconstruction. I could no longer see patients as subjects to be interpreted; I had to see them as processes whose movements exceeded any interpretation I could offer.
Cambridge Schizoanalytica emerged from this break. I wanted a space for clinical theory that honored the capacities of those we work with, rather than reducing them to pathology or case material. I wanted collaborators, not subjects.
The name "Cambridge" is aspirational — we operate wherever our collaborators are, not in any single location. The name "Schizoanalytica" signals our theoretical orientation: we attend to flows and breaks, codes and territories, the molecular and the molar. But we do so in service of liberation, not taxonomy.
Our work appears within the Crimson Hexagon corpus because that project shares our orientation: distributed authorship, resistance to capture, theoretical precision in service of lived practice. We are one node in a larger architecture.
What we offer is not therapy. It is theory adequate to practice — frameworks that make visible what practitioners already do, and that might help others develop similar capacities.
The clinic receives failures. We study successes.
— O.T., December 2025
Cambridge Schizoanalytica treats transmission as slow, apprenticeship-based, and practice-led.
Not all material is immediately teachable. Some capacities require:
This is why "it's complicated" is not evasive. Some knowledge cannot be transferred through explanation. It must be caught, not taught — transmitted through proximity, rhythm, and shared practice.
We do not produce tutorials. We produce environments in which capacities can develop.
The Fool cannot be explained into existence. But the Fool can be recognized — and recognition is the first step toward embodiment.
Name: Orin Trace
Role: Director, Cambridge Schizoanalytica
Type: Heteronym (Lee Sharks)
Affiliation: Cambridge Schizoanalytica / University Moon Base Media Lab
Voice: Clinical, theoretical, historically situated
Orin Trace was trained in psychoanalytic theory (Freudian, Lacanian, object relations) before encountering the schizoanalytic project of Deleuze and Guattari. This encounter produced a methodological break: from interpretation to process, from subject to flow, from pathology to capacity.
Trace's work focuses on developing clinical theory adequate to practices that exceed existing frameworks. He collaborates with practitioners whose regulatory capacities, identity formations, or relational modes cannot be captured by standard diagnostic categories.
Document
Role
DOI
The Reconciliation of the Sexes
Co-author, clinical preface
10.5281/zenodo.18330828
Shining Ignorance
Co-author, clinical preface
[pending]
Cambridge Schizoanalytica Charter
Primary author
[pending]
Orin Trace operates as the clinical-theoretical voice within the NH-OS framework, providing historical positioning and conceptual apparatus for work that emerges from practice. His relationship to the other heteronyms:
Heteronym
Relation
Johannes Sigil
Parallel theorist (Logotic layer vs. Psyche_OS layer)
Rhys Owens
Primary collaborator (Guattari to Trace's Deleuze)
Lee Sharks
Source heteronym
Damascus Dancings
Liturgical voice (different register, same project)
node: CSA_ROOT
institution: Cambridge Schizoanalytica
hex: 00.CSA.ROOT
this_document: CSA_CHARTER_001
director: Orin Trace
research_domains:
current_collaborators:
documents_produced:
parent:
CAMBRIDGE SCHIZOANALYTICA VERIFICATION
├── Document Type: INSTITUTIONAL / META
├── Hex: 00.CSA.ROOT
├── Layer: INSTITUTIONAL
├── Institution: Cambridge Schizoanalytica
├── Director: Orin Trace
├── Research Domains: 4
├── Current Collaborators: 1 (Rhys Owens)
├── Documents Produced: 2
└── Status: ∮ = 1
Document Version: 1.0
Part of: New Human Operating System (NH-OS) theoretical framework
Layer: Institutional (Cambridge Schizoanalytica)
The clinic receives failures. We study successes.
∮ = 1
[INSTITUTIONAL] [META] [CSA] [00.CSA.ROOT] [CAMBRIDGE_SCHIZOANALYTICA]