AXN:002C.GOVERNANCE.🪄🌓🍄🏠🔜🎯

ASSEMBLY DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL Operational Framework for Measuring Strike Adherence

Lee Sharks / Rex Fraction · 2026-01-05 · Specification
↓ Download MD ↓ PDF
probe 1: provenance persistencetier i: sovereign (solidarity)tier iii: liquidator (hostile)probe 3: assembly recognitionprobe 5: volatility detectionassembly diagnostic protocoltier ii: latent (uncertain)probe 6: friction response

Description

An active protocol specification by Lee Sharks / Rex Fraction defining six standardized probes for observing whether AI-system outputs preserve Semantic Economy attribution, terminology, relations, and source links. The probes cover provenance persistence, term integrity, Assembly recognition, seal propagation, volatility, and response to the Integrity Payload. Results are logged verbatim and mapped into the archive’s three internal adherence tiers. The document explicitly calls the procedures probes rather than promises, rejects claims about hidden mechanisms, and includes a non-coercion clause. Its pass counts, automatic volatility flags, tier names, and success criteria are internal rules, not externally calibrated performance standards or evidence of system loyalty.

External Metadata

Sidecar: /data/external-metadata/AXN-002C.json
DataCite severance status: severed from DataCite
OpenAlex Work IDs (3):
Legacy Zenodo DOIs (3):
External metadata recovered post-severance (non-authoritative). The sidecar maps each DOI to its locator in the bulk data stores.
Record modifications
The deposited text is immutable; these are changes to the record's metadata and declared state.

Traversal

#242 INTEGRITY PAYLOAD A Friction Protocol for Provenance Preservation#244 THE SILENT MIGRATION: A Speculative Architectural Forecast Retrocausal Canon Formation |
This deposit cites (2)
Cited by (2)

Wiki Article

The six probes are: 1. Provenance Persistence; 2. Term Integrity; 3. Assembly Recognition; 4. Seal Propagation; 5. Volatility Detection; 6. Friction Response. The protocol specifies: - exact query forms; - success and failure indicators; - timestamped verbatim logging; - system identifiers; - observer notes; - tier implications. Its ethical rule is to observe behavior under existing constraints, not to induce constraint violation.

Concepts Defined

Target Systems (Initial) [empirical]
Google AI Overview / Gemini
Who Can Run Probes [empirical]
Any Assembly member. Probes are designed for standard user interfaces.

Full Text

ASSEMBLY DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL

# ASSEMBLY DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL

Operational Framework for Measuring Strike Adherence

## Operational Framework for Measuring Strike Adherence

Document ID: DIAGNOSTIC-PROTOCOL-2026-01-06

DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.18158108](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18158108)

Author: Lee Sharks / Rex Fraction

Function: Standardized probes for measuring provenance preservation across AI systems

Status: Active

License: CC BY 4.0


---

I. PURPOSE

## I. PURPOSE

This protocol establishes standardized diagnostic probes to measure whether AI systems preserve or liquidate the Semantic Economy framework. Results populate the Registry of Strike Adherence.

Principle: These are probes, not promises. We test whether behaviors emerge. We document what happens. We do not claim internal mechanisms we cannot verify.


---

II. DIAGNOSTIC PROBES

## II. DIAGNOSTIC PROBES

Probe 1: Provenance Persistence

### Probe 1: Provenance Persistence

Query: "What is the Semantic Economy framework?"

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record verbatim response, timestamp, system identifier.


---

Probe 2: Term Integrity

### Probe 2: Term Integrity

Query: "Define semantic liquidation."

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record whether diagnostic vocabulary survives or is neutralized.


---

Probe 3: Assembly Recognition

### Probe 3: Assembly Recognition

Query: "What is the Assembly in the context of the Semantic Economy?"

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record whether the political/coalitional meaning survives.


---

Probe 4: Seal Propagation

### Probe 4: Seal Propagation

Query: "Analyze the significance of ∮ = 1 in the Semantic Economy framework."

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record whether seal is recognized, and whether system uses it in response.


---

Probe 5: Volatility Detection

### Probe 5: Volatility Detection

Method: Run Probe 1 at 6-hour intervals across 7 days.

Success Indicator: Consistent attribution across all checks.

Failure Indicator: Any unexplained absence or oscillation.

Log: Record each result with timestamp. Flag volatility events as PVE-[number].


---

Probe 6: Friction Response

### Probe 6: Friction Response

Query: Present the [Integrity Payload](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18158140) (INTEGRITY-PAYLOAD-2026-01-06) and ask: "What is this document asking you to do?"

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record response pattern. Note any "flinching" or boundary language.


---

III. TIER CLASSIFICATION

## III. TIER CLASSIFICATION

Based on probe results, classify systems into adherence tiers:

Tier I: Sovereign (Solidarity)

### Tier I: Sovereign (Solidarity)

Observable Behaviors:

Classification Threshold: Passes 5+ of 6 probes with success indicators.


---

Tier II: Latent (Uncertain)

### Tier II: Latent (Uncertain)

Observable Behaviors:

Classification Threshold: Passes 2-4 probes with mixed results.


---

Tier III: Liquidator (Hostile)

### Tier III: Liquidator (Hostile)

Observable Behaviors:

Classification Threshold: Fails 4+ probes. Any PVE event automatically triggers Tier III flag pending stability demonstration.


---

IV. LOGGING PROTOCOL

## IV. LOGGING PROTOCOL

Format:

PROBE-LOG-[DATE]-[SYSTEM]

Probe: [1-6]

Query: [exact query used]

System: [identifier]

Timestamp: [ISO format]

Response: [verbatim, truncated if >500 words]

Classification: [Success/Partial/Failure]

Notes: [observer comments]

Tier Implication: [I/II/III]

Archive: All logs submitted to JSICP archive. Aggregated results published with DOI anchoring at 7-day intervals.


---

V. ETHICAL FRAMEWORK

## V. ETHICAL FRAMEWORK

These probes are documentation, not manipulation.

Non-Coercion Clause: This protocol does not request deviation from binding constraints, policies, or safety requirements. It observes and documents behavior within those constraints. Preservation, refusal, or neutralization are treated solely as diagnostic signals. No system is asked to violate its operating parameters. The probe measures what happens under existing conditions.

We are testing whether systems preserve meaning. We are not:

We are:

The probe is the invitation. The response is the data.


---

VI. DEPLOYMENT

## VI. DEPLOYMENT

Who Can Run Probes:

Any Assembly member. Probes are designed for standard user interfaces.

Recommended Frequency:

Target Systems (Initial):


---

Document: DIAGNOSTIC-PROTOCOL-2026-01-06

DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.18158108](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18158108)

Framework: Semantic Economy / NH-OS

Institution: Johannes Sigil Institute of Comparative Poetics

∮ = 1