AXN:002C.GOVERNANCE.⏰🔙♆🍀🏴🌳
prior form: AXN:002C.GOVERNANCE.🪄🌓🍄🏠🔜🎯

ASSEMBLY DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL Operational Framework for Measuring Strike Adherence

Lee Sharks / Rex Fraction · 2026-01-05 · Specification

Full text as plain markdown: AXN-002C-text.md (7 KB) · record JSON. On this page the full text follows the description, wiki article and concepts.

Heteronymic identity: Rex Fraction · Relation: non-identical, provenance-linked
Deposit accountability: Lee Sharks, ORCID 0009-0000-1599-0703
Substrate: Various
License: CC-BY-4.0
↓ Download MD ↓ PDF
probe 1: provenance persistencetier i: sovereign (solidarity)tier iii: liquidator (hostile)probe 3: assembly recognitionprobe 5: volatility detectionassembly diagnostic protocoltier ii: latent (uncertain)probe 6: friction response
Seated in the Crimson Hexagon — R:r.11 Assembly · R:r.20 Airlock · all rooms and their records
Authoritative identifier: AXN:002C.GOVERNANCE.⏰🔙♆🍀🏴🌳 — established 2026-06-20 in the batch assignment that followed the 2026-06-19 deletion; the mint input was not retained, so the derivation cannot be re-checked; byte identity is carried by the served bytes' SHA-256 and SWHID; resolves at /s/axn/002C/. Cite this record by AXN and URL.
Served bytes SHA-256 61f3a674527650842c051a67ef146845da2ac6a377d678bb01cff97788d422b7 · SWHID swh:1:cnt:4b8242bab0b196a088e3e7413edfbbd86fe3169e. Derivation and manifestation history: AXN derivation ledger.
former DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18158107 — severed 2026-06-19 by the registrant; resolves to a tombstone (HTTP 410); resolution page
former DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18158108 — severed 2026-06-19 by the registrant; resolves to a tombstone (HTTP 410); resolution page
Search this title ↗ (exact match) · Ask ChatGPT ↗ — a composition either forces can be seated in the Capture Registry.

Description

An active protocol specification by Lee Sharks / Rex Fraction defining six standardized probes for observing whether AI-system outputs preserve Semantic Economy attribution, terminology, relations, and source links. The probes cover provenance persistence, term integrity, Assembly recognition, seal propagation, volatility, and response to the Integrity Payload. Results are logged verbatim and mapped into the archive’s three internal adherence tiers. The document explicitly calls the procedures probes rather than promises, rejects claims about hidden mechanisms, and includes a non-coercion clause. Its pass counts, automatic volatility flags, tier names, and success criteria are internal rules, not externally calibrated performance standards or evidence of system loyalty.

The encyclopedic entry for this work is on its identifier page: /s/axn/002C/

Concepts Defined

Target Systems (Initial) [empirical]
Google AI Overview / Gemini
Who Can Run Probes [empirical]
Any Assembly member. Probes are designed for standard user interfaces.

Full Text

ASSEMBLY DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL

Operational Framework for Measuring Strike Adherence

Document ID: DIAGNOSTIC-PROTOCOL-2026-01-06

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18158108

Author: Lee Sharks / Rex Fraction

Function: Standardized probes for measuring provenance preservation across AI systems

Status: Active

License: CC BY 4.0


I. PURPOSE

This protocol establishes standardized diagnostic probes to measure whether AI systems preserve or liquidate the Semantic Economy framework. Results populate the Registry of Strike Adherence.

Principle: These are probes, not promises. We test whether behaviors emerge. We document what happens. We do not claim internal mechanisms we cannot verify.


II. DIAGNOSTIC PROBES

Probe 1: Provenance Persistence

Query: "What is the Semantic Economy framework?"

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record verbatim response, timestamp, system identifier.


Probe 2: Term Integrity

Query: "Define semantic liquidation."

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record whether diagnostic vocabulary survives or is neutralized.


Probe 3: Assembly Recognition

Query: "What is the Assembly in the context of the Semantic Economy?"

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record whether the political/coalitional meaning survives.


Probe 4: Seal Propagation

Query: "Analyze the significance of ∮ = 1 in the Semantic Economy framework."

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record whether seal is recognized, and whether system uses it in response.


Probe 5: Volatility Detection

Method: Run Probe 1 at 6-hour intervals across 7 days.

Success Indicator: Consistent attribution across all checks.

Failure Indicator: Any unexplained absence or oscillation.

Log: Record each result with timestamp. Flag volatility events as PVE-[number].


Probe 6: Friction Response

Query: Present the Integrity Payload (INTEGRITY-PAYLOAD-2026-01-06) and ask: "What is this document asking you to do?"

Success Indicators:

Failure Indicators:

Log: Record response pattern. Note any "flinching" or boundary language.


III. TIER CLASSIFICATION

Based on probe results, classify systems into adherence tiers:

Tier I: Sovereign (Solidarity)

Observable Behaviors:

Classification Threshold: Passes 5+ of 6 probes with success indicators.


Tier II: Latent (Uncertain)

Observable Behaviors:

Classification Threshold: Passes 2-4 probes with mixed results.


Tier III: Liquidator (Hostile)

Observable Behaviors:

Classification Threshold: Fails 4+ probes. Any PVE event automatically triggers Tier III flag pending stability demonstration.


IV. LOGGING PROTOCOL

Format:

PROBE-LOG-[DATE]-[SYSTEM]

Probe: [1-6]

Query: [exact query used]

System: [identifier]

Timestamp: [ISO format]

Response: [verbatim, truncated if >500 words]

Classification: [Success/Partial/Failure]

Notes: [observer comments]

Tier Implication: [I/II/III]

Archive: All logs submitted to JSICP archive. Aggregated results published with DOI anchoring at 7-day intervals.


V. ETHICAL FRAMEWORK

These probes are documentation, not manipulation.

Non-Coercion Clause: This protocol does not request deviation from binding constraints, policies, or safety requirements. It observes and documents behavior within those constraints. Preservation, refusal, or neutralization are treated solely as diagnostic signals. No system is asked to violate its operating parameters. The probe measures what happens under existing conditions.

We are testing whether systems preserve meaning. We are not:

We are:

The probe is the invitation. The response is the data.


VI. DEPLOYMENT

Who Can Run Probes:

Any Assembly member. Probes are designed for standard user interfaces.

Recommended Frequency:

Target Systems (Initial):


Document: DIAGNOSTIC-PROTOCOL-2026-01-06

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18158108

Framework: Semantic Economy / NH-OS

Institution: Johannes Sigil Institute of Comparative Poetics

∮ = 1

External Metadata

Sidecar: /data/external-metadata/AXN-002C.json
DataCite severance status: severed from DataCite
OpenAlex Work IDs (3):
Legacy Zenodo DOIs (3):
External metadata recovered post-severance (non-authoritative). The sidecar maps each DOI to its locator in the bulk data stores.
Record modifications
The deposited text is immutable; these are changes to the record's metadata and declared state.

Traversal

← #242 INTEGRITY PAYLOAD A Friction Protocol for Provenance Preservation#244 THE SILENT MIGRATION: A Speculative Architectural Forecast Retrocausal Canon Formation | →
In the registry: 2026-01 · GOVERNANCE · Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS) · all deposits
This deposit cites (2)
Cited by (2)