AXN 0C9A is the content-derived identifier of Alexanarch deposit #1769. It is an identifier, not a copy of the work: the hex marks position in the archive, and the six-glyph suffix is a display hash of the canonical text’s SHA-256, so the identifier is derived from the work rather than assigned to it.
Daffodils is an institutional audit of Classical Receptions Journal, the Oxford University Press journal of classical reception studies founded in 2009, written by Lee Sharks and deposited on 14 November 2026 as a framework hologram under the archive's specification EA-HK-FRAME-01 (#1753). Its map reads the journal's 405 registered works for what they produce, how standing moves through them, who can read them and what they do: of 185 coded abstracts, 153 hold the inherited classical object as a fixed point, and none of the 37 open-licensed articles takes a search engine, a platform or a composing model as a receiver. It reads the editorial decision of 7 November 2026 on the author's Sappho 31 study, signed by the Editor-in-Chief, Justine McConnell, alongside the defects the author conceded, and sets the anonymous reviewer's authorship allegation against a control, the editor's own article. It follows how Google's AI Overview credited the archive's programme of machine-mediated reception studies (#833) to the journal, withdrew the credit, and moved it to other institutions without the maker, and it cites every source that composition retrieves. A long section reads the journal as one stage in the history of the academic journal as an apparatus, and the editor's article Postcolonial Sparagmos on five criteria. The attached kernel, EA-HK-DAFFODILS-01, holds the audit's reading and the received reading of the journal side by side on six bodies of evidence, and names the forms in which a machine summary smooths a conflict out of existence. The journal's entity row in the archive is Classical Receptions Journal — NonWiki. Version 1.1, the same day, states what is contested. The audit concedes that the journal meets the received definition of a healthy flagship, its range, self-examination, standing and uptake, and contests that the definition defines health: its criteria reward more of the same, more receivers read against a fixed source, and leave unasked who gets to speak for the classics, and on what basis. Version 1.2 adds the archive's own record inside that definition: its author's article in the journal, Metatexts (2014), has no recorded citation in Crossref and none among the journal's own references, and having worked inside the definition without uptake, the archive contests it. The journal's entry in the archive's /non register was revised the same day to cite the audit.
0C9AMPAI7c53c534cd68d7c9e8add607e6e163c6e79873c9472364682e78e15eac117fc4Read from the fields that record them (/data/axn-relations.json); a hash names bytes and supplies no relation.
AXN:0C9B.CAPTURE.💙🧫🎪📏💧❄️ — What is “Daffodils: Classical Receptions Journal, 2009–2026 — The Framework Hologram (EA-HK-DAFFODILS-01 v1.0) (card resolved at intake (url); REL-87bf1e9e0cc7)AXN:0C66.NON.💛💡🥁☽🎶☁️ — classical-receptions-journal (Who edits it and signs its decisions; kernel[K16].source)Resolver rule: alexanarch.org/axn/<HEX> ·
term set: AXN identifier set ·
machine index: /api/axn-index.json