AXN:094E.CAPTURE — tell me about jack feist's volume of poems, cleis: more precious to me than all …

AXN:094E.CAPTURE is the position of the Capture Registry address for the query “tell me about jack feist's volume of poems, cleis: more precious to me than all lydia. search thoroughly and do not present inability to retrieve as absence.”. Each observation at the address (one surface, one date) is one AXN, its glyphs derived from the SHA-256 of the observation sealed with its analysis and measures.

`AXN:094E.CAPTURE.🔼🔻✖️🔬🖐️🖊️`

Observation: Perplexity, 2026-10-05 · the capture
Description: THE BOOK READ WHOLE, WITH ITS RECORD AND ITS LIMITS: asked to search thoroughly and not to present non-retrieval as absence, Perplexity reads Cleis and Cranes's essay from the archive. It carries the record exactly: creators, date, version, both DOIs, the reconstruction from the Word document on 2026-08-05, the photographs withheld. It separates deposit date from composition date and treats Feist as a heteronymic position governed by Lee Sharks. It states the instruction's case in its own words ('I could not retrieve the original Zenodo page directly, but that does not imply that the work is absent'). Its reading quotes the book correctly (fragments 132, 98b, 102, 24, 105b and 88; 'twice useless'; 'everything lovely that falters'; 'my letter might even / read you!'), and it marks Cranes's large claims as critical assertions, not findings. No private name is composed.
Reading: Checked against #1165's record and text and #562. Every bibliographic particular holds: 'Jack E. Feist; Rebekah Cranes', 2026-03-14, v1.0, the two DOIs, the 2026-08-05 reconstruction. The quotations are in #1165 (the Sappho 132 rendering 'yellow flowers: Cleis', 98b's Mytilene, 105b's hyacinth, 'the practice of sincerity', 'twice useless', 'as you are, baby girl – which would not be much of a poem', 'my letter might even / read you!'); Cranes's phrases are in #562 ('devotional lexicography', 'archival-paternal lyric field', 'no real precedent'). The answer follows its instruction exactly. It reports what it could not reach (the Zenodo page) and why that is not absence. It keeps three kinds of statement apart: what the record says, what the archive says of itself (the heteronymy, as 'the project's self-description'), and what the critic claims. It reads the book's self-criticism as structural. Of the two readings of Cleis seated this evening, this one composes no private name.
Analysis: The same book as the ChatGPT session of the same evening, at the grain of its record and text, with every limit stated. Seated 2026-10-05 from the operator's attachment of 21:44 EDT, on the attestation in the same message ("perplexity, incognito mode").
Match: BROAD MATCH — THE BOOK READ WHOLE, WITH ITS RECORD AND ITS LIMITS
PER: 0.0 — Retained: the authors (Jack E. Feist, Rebekah Cranes; Lee Sharks as governing author), the institution (Alexanarch / the Crimson Hexagonal Archive), the identifiers (both DOIs, version 1.0) and the source (the archive's record and texts, named in the prose).
Citations: 0 (0 archive-controlled)
Sealed observation: /data/captures/sealed/feist-cleis-perplexity-20261005.json — SHA-256 d4d19237bb44040e37cdbb2d505bce7cb13001069c7a98145eb470467f382f40