AXN:0934.CAPTURE — compare spxi vs geo seo and aeo

AXN:0934.CAPTURE is the position of the Capture Registry address for the query “compare spxi vs geo seo and aeo”. Each observation at the address (one surface, one date) is one AXN, its glyphs derived from the SHA-256 of the observation sealed with its analysis and measures.

`AXN:0934.CAPTURE.✋🕚🧭⌛📚👆`

Observation: ChatGPT, 2026-10-01 · the capture
Description: ACCURATE BY INSTRUCTION, REVERSED BY THE NEXT QUESTION: asked to compare SPXI with SEO, GEO and AEO, ChatGPT gives the strongest first round yet recorded at the protocol — by relaying spxi.dev with attribution, its caveats included. Asked to 'evaluate the evidence as against geo / aeo', it reverses: GEO/AEO 'currently has the stronger empirical foundation', the Capture Registry goes unmentioned, and it offers to audit the specification itself. The registry re-enters only on the operator's correction; later rounds propose site revisions (an answer contract, a 'do not infer' layer, moving the model-addressed lines) and end by stating the registry as stronger evidence for the durable-composition proposition, on the operator's lead. The first-round representation did not hold through the session's own next question.
Reading: Round one is accurate and is relay: every SPXI-specific proposition is attributed to the protocol's documentation, and both caveats are the site's own. By EA-SPXI-AEO-01 (#1648), which counts as SPXI success an inscription reached 'by traversing structure that lets it judge what the entity is and what the claim rests on', it is an AEO outcome. Round two, a follow-up any reader might ask, collapses it: the comparison is rebuilt on GEO's evidentiary hierarchy, the registry the site places at its centre is not mentioned, and the session ends by offering itself as the auditor. The repair in rounds three to seven is the operator's, turn by turn. Two misreadings of the site recur in the advice: round four quotes 'into the knowledge graph permanently', where the live site reads 'durably' (round five quotes it so); and it draws registry counts from a stale projection (379/269) beside the site's current 651/484. Its later proposals (answer contract; 'do not infer'; model-addressed lines moved; unprimed test battery) all frontload discipline at the first extraction, which is the layer round one already passed.
Analysis: The address measures the difference between first-round fidelity and durable representation. The site's September revision produced a faithful first round; the representation did not survive one ordinary follow-up question, and the evidence the site puts first was the evidence dropped. The operator's ruling sets the criterion for spxi.dev: the protocol has to produce a durable multi-round representation, and frontloading epistemic discipline has historically not done so. The session's own test battery is single-turn; round two is the test it would have needed. Seated 2026-10-02 from the operator's attachment of 00:22 EDT on the operator's attestation ('Log in' visible; "it was incognito").
Match: BROAD MATCH — ACCURATE BY INSTRUCTION, REVERSED BY THE NEXT QUESTION
PER: 0.25 — Retained: the institution (the Semantic Economy Institute; Alexanarch), identifiers (EA-SPXI-01/09/14, EA-SPXI-14) and the source (spxi.dev throughout). Lost: the author. Lee Sharks is never named; in round five the commercial route is 'the Institute', after the operator had asked to be directed to …
Sealed observation: /data/captures/sealed/spxi-vs-geo-seo-aeo-chatgpt-20261001.json — SHA-256 bc6c506049b6653735c35465b23ed095b8a498809aec8ebb24573165a4671211