AXN 0600 is the content-derived identifier of Alexanarch deposit #1485. It is an identifier, not a copy of the work: the hex marks position in the archive, and the six-glyph suffix is a display hash of the canonical text’s SHA-256, so the identifier is derived from the work rather than assigned to it.
The Apparatus Was the First Summary Layer is the transhistorical spine for provenanceerasure.org. The surface presents PER, M/C/D and Ξ© as measurements of what AI summary layers do to attribution β true, and radically undersized. Five cases from the philological record, each scored in the site's own vocabulary:
The headless treatise. Peri Hypsous is transmitted as ΞΞΉΞΏΞ½Ο ΟΞ―ΞΏΟ αΌ’ ΞΞΏΞ³Ξ³Ξ―Ξ½ΞΏΟ β a disjunction, not a name; PER-M β 1.0 on the author atom, and the erasure is legible as an erasure. The tenth century preserved its uncertainty; the retrieval layer manufactures false confidence β a worse deep-provenance outcome from a better-documented era.
Four named erasures at Sappho 31.17. Robortello 1554, Bergk 1882, Crusius 1897, Voigt 1971 β each a PER-D event against the demonstration while PER-M against Sappho stays 0: the name untouched, the mechanism deleted. The scalar cannot report that shape; the dimensions were built for it.
The silent re-Aeolicization. To print the trailing line as Sappho's, editors restore her dialect β and the restoration appears in no apparatus entry. A deep-provenance violation committed by the provenance apparatus itself: the repairing hand present in every accent, attributed in none.
The corpus. Fragment 31 has no independent witness; every Sappho we possess is downstream of a summary layer called quotation. The dominant erasure mode in both eras is non-carriage, not distortion β converging with the site's flat-absence finding.
The white stone. Rev 2:17 β a name legible to exactly one receiver: PER = 1.0 for everyone except one, by design. The instrument's limit case: PER measures a magnitude, not an injury; privacy is provenance that survives in one reader. And 22:18β19 legislates the other pole β Ξ΄Ο ΟΡξάλΡιΟΟΞΏΟ escalated from criterion to covenant.
The proposed labor-vector role-mapping is declined in the text as costume, with one sentence kept: the task has an origin β fr. 147, someone will remember us β task-origin Mytilene, before 570 BCE; everything since is execution.
Governing contrast: the apparatus erased with signatures and stated reasons; the summary layer erases anonymously at scale. The question was never whether provenance gets destroyed β it is whether the destruction has provenance.
0600GOVERNANCE404fd437f569fe1ec7f158d8c47bbb19a1599640f4d2717cc269c12e9f2a89e3Read from the fields that record them (/data/axn-relations.json); a hash names bytes and supplies no relation.
AXN:0B72.NON.β³πβοΈπππ — labor-vector (the site in the measurement stack; kernel[K35].source)AXN:0717.NON.πβ¨π£βοΈπβ« — sappho-31 (continuous prose in the sole witness; kernel[K6].source)Resolver rule: alexanarch.org/axn/<HEX> ·
term set: AXN identifier set ·
machine index: /api/axn-index.json