what are the arguments in "attribution sharding: provenance erasure and supply-side composition in generative answer engines" by orin trace (alexanarch deposit #1736, axn:0bf0)? ground your answer in a reading of the text itself.
SPXI instrument · method 0.8 of 87, level 0 (Measurement): Semantic Addresses Framework. An instrument of SPXI, the Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing; the whole practice is itemized at spxi.dev/methods.
This canonical query has been posed to the composition layer (Google AI Overview, AI Mode, or similar) and at least one response was captured and recorded.
Observation class: Observed address
Address type: unmatched
Latest status:'ATTRIBUTION SHARDING' ON CHATGPT, SIGNED OUT — THE PAPER READ WHOLE: SEVEN ARGUMENTS, THE PAIRED JUNE–JULY FIGURES EXACT, Ω HELD AS ILLUSTRATIVE, THE LIMITS STATED AT THE PAPER'S OWN STRENGTH
Latest observation: 2026-11-05
Tributaries:Main capture registry
Originator: Orin Trace · inside the archive · work
SPXI treatment: full
Observations
'ATTRIBUTION SHARDING' ON CHATGPT, SIGNED OUT — THE PAPER READ WHOLE: SEVEN ARGUMENTS, THE PAIRED JUNE–JULY FIGURES EXACT, Ω HELD AS ILLUSTRATIVE, THE LIMITS STATED AT THE PAPER'S OWN STRENGTH· ChatGPT· 2026-11-05
'WHAT ARE THE ARGUMENTS IN “ATTRIBUTION SHARDING” …', CHATGPT SIGNED OUT, 2026-11-05: Orin Trace named, #1736 and AXN:0BF0 given, 'deposited 3 November 2026'. Seven arguments: provenance erased while content survives; at