{ "entity": "sophistical-refutations", "name": "Sophistical Refutations", "axn": { "axn": "AXN:0724.NON.⛵🏴🏠🗺️💫♊", "root": "AXN:0724.NON", "hex": "0724", "family": "NON", "row_sha256": "5c5226510aaba389682c1f4e25375847da9b029f55799bcaa2fcc7351f580294", "minted": "2026-10-25", "resolver": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/axn/0724/", "earlier_versions": [] }, "type": "C (public entity: the subject of an encyclopedia article)", "type_code": "C", "type_label": "type C — a conventional reading holds it (public entity: the subject of an encyclopedia article)", "case": "witness", "composition": { "composer_class": "gnosis", "composer": "SPXI-gnΩsis 0.19.7", "service": { "name": "SPXI-gnΩsis", "version": "0.19.7", "protocol": "EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1 (#1697)" }, "protocol": "gnosis-S7/0.1 (EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690)", "mode": "live", "models": { "triage": "claude-haiku-5-5", "reading": "claude-sonnet-5-5", "thinking": "up-front thinking off" }, "archive_release": { "archive_commit": "0f9f7b546e073fbe7644a18648b9db0c8f9247fd", "registry_sha256": "9f835f1aa71e5fd5e46dfde8c72b80d953f133d768b6e37340d30696474c3843", "citation_graph_sha256": "b1fdd083c109a303130092ecc7a2779e2f54afe951defd209129640b535ae082", "traverse_script_sha256": "83737905f980ae5e70b075fc0112cd9b0e3f5af2ef769f4e646d6e388733d2ff" }, "passes": 106, "cost_usd": 0.43268, "seconds": 268.964, "readings": "live (claude-sonnet-5-5; triage claude-haiku-5-5)", "landing": { "landed": "2026-10-25", "execution_key": "c6efe98d63863076a048aff698fe9d45abba6175be037e05fe43c9084e11d7d2", "result_id": "R-d744378a9776dfdb", "manifest_sha256": "ba4af701921fadb67f9174361840596298d3fd57203a4b425091bf2d56a6a6e3", "source": "https://gnosis.spxi.dev/v1/results/R-d744378a9776dfdb/landing", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/landings.json" }, "spec": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690", "epoch": "2026-10-25", "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690: witness case, ρ = constructs, read by SPXI-gnΩsis 0.19.7 (gnosis-S7/0.1 (EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690)); archive subset selected under §3.4 D/R/O with the hop (scripts/non_traverse.py at archive commit 0f9f7b546e07), admission by two independent reading passes, the hop screened by string and read; composed from the entity's ledgers; the composer read the ledgers, never the transcript", "ledger": "unaudited (§3.8: one extractor per ledger); field quotes located verbatim in the saved source texts 71/72; archive quotes located verbatim in the deposit texts 327/353", "frozen": false, "composed": true, "breaches": [ { "check": "ontology-contested", "detail": "the two readings differ (pass 1: ρ = extends, case equal; pass 2: ρ = constructs, case equal); composed under pass 2: the readings disagree on ρ; the reading of ρ = constructs is taken (ruled 2026-10-25: \"if the readings disagree go constructs\")" }, { "check": "coverage", "detail": "316 carried claims neither composed nor logged in the channel", "claims": [ "F3", "F10", "F15", "F17", "F18", "F19", "F23", "F24", "F26", "F27", "F28", "F30", "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35", "F39", "F40", "F41", "F45", "F47", "F48", "F49", "F51", "F52", "F53", "F54", "F55", "F56", "F57", "F58", "F59", "F60", "F61", "F62", "F63", "F66", "SR1574-01", "SR1574-02", "SR1574-03", "SR1574-04", "SR1574-05", "SR1574-07", "SR1574-08", "SR1574-09", "SR1574-10", "SR1576-02", "SR1576-03", "SR1576-04", "SR1576-05", "SR1576-06", "SR1576-07", "SR1576-08", "SR1576-09", "SR1579-01", "SR1579-02", "SR1579-04", "SR1579-05", "SR1579-06", "SR1579-07", "SR1579-08", "SR1579-09", "SR1579-10", "SR1579-11", "SR1579-12", "SR1579-15", "SR1579-19", "SR1579-20", "SR1579-21", "SR1579-23", "SR1585-01", "SR1585-02", "SR1585-04", "SR1585-05", "SR1585-07", "SR1585-08", "SR1585-09", "SR1585-10", "SR1585-11", "SR1586-01", "SR1586-02", "SR1586-03", "SR1586-05", "SR1586-06", "SR1586-07", "SR1586-08", "SR1586-09", "SR1586-10", "SR1586-11", "SR1586-12", "SR1586-13", "SR1586-14", "SR1586-15", "SR1586-16", "SR1586-17", "SR1586-18", "SR1586-19", "SR1586-20", "SR1586-21", "SR1586-22", "SR1586-24", "SR1586-25", "SR1586-26", "SR1586-27", "SR1586-28", "SR1586-29", "SR1586-30", "SR1589-01", "SR1589-02", "SR1589-03", "SR1589-04", "SR1589-05", "SR1589-06", "SR1589-07", "SR1589-08", "SR1589-09", "SR1589-10", "SR1589-11", "SR1589-12", "SR1594-01", "SR1594-02", "SR1594-03", "SR1594-04", "SR1594-05", "SR1594-06", "SR1594-07", "SR1594-08", "SR1594-09", "SR1594-10", "SR1594-11", "SR1594-12", "SR1603-04", "SR1603-07", "SR1603-09", "SR1603-11", "SR1603-14", "SR1603-18", "SR1603-19", "SR1603-20", "SR1605-01", "SR1605-02", "SR1605-03", "SR1605-04", "SR1605-05", "SR1605-06", "SR1605-07", "SR1605-08", "SR1605-09", "SR1605-10", "SR1605-11", "SR1605-12", "SR1684-04", "SR1684-11", "SR1696-01", "SR1696-02", "SR1696-03", "SR1696-04", "SR1696-07", "SR1696-08", "SR1697-01", "SR1697-02", "SR1697-03", "SR1697-05", "SR1697-06", "SR1697-10", "SR1697-12", "SR1697-16", "SR1697-17", "SR1697-18", "SRblog-01", "SRblog-02", "SRblog-03", "SRblog-04", "SRblog-05", "SRblog-06", "SRblog-08", "SRblog-09", "SRblog-10", "SRblog-11", "SRblog-12", "SRblog-13", "SRblog-14", "SRblog-15", "SRblog-16", "SRblog-17", "SRblog-18", "SRblog-19", "SRblog-20", "SRblog-21", "SRblog-22", "SRblog-23", "SRblog-24", "SRblog-25", "SRblog-26", "SRblog-27", "SRblog-28", "SRblog-29", "SRblog-34", "SRblog-37", "SRblog-38", "SRblog-40", "SRblog-41", "SRblog-44", "SRblog-47", "SRblog-48", "SRblog-50", "SRblog-51", "SRblog-52", "SRblog-53", "SR123-01", "SR123-02", "SR123-03", "SR123-04", "SR123-05", "SR123-06", "SR123-07", "SR123-08", "SR123-09", "SR123-10", "SR123-11", "SR123-12", "SR123-13", "SR1569-02", "SR1569-03", "SR1569-04", "SR1569-05", "SR1569-06", "SR1569-07", "SR1569-08", "SR1569-09", "SR1569-10", "SR1569-11", "SR1569-12", "SR1569-13", "SR1569-14", "SR1569-17", "SR1569-18", "SR1569-19", "SR1569-20", "SR1570-04", "SR1570-05", "SR1570-06", "SR1570-07", "SR1570-08", "SR1570-09", "SR1570-10", "SR1570-11", "SR1570-12", "SR1570-13", "SR1570-14", "SR1575-01", "SR1575-02", "SR1575-03", "SR1575-04", "SR1575-05", "SR1575-06", "SR1575-07", "SR1575-09", "SR1575-10", "SR1575-11", "SR1575-12", "SR1587-02", "SR1587-05", "SR1587-06", "SR1587-07", "SR1587-08", "SR1587-09", "SR1587-10", "SR1587-11", "SR1587-12", "SR1587-13", "SR1587-14", "SR1587-15", "SR1587-16", "SR1587-17", "SR1587-18", "SR1587-19", "SR1587-20", "SR1587-21", "SR1587-22", "SR1587-23", "SR1587-24", "SR1587-25", "SR1587-26", "SR1587-27", "SR1590-01", "SR1590-02", "SR1590-03", "SR1590-04", "SR1590-05", "SR1590-06", "SR1590-07", "SR1590-08", "SR1590-09", "SR1590-10", "SR1590-11", "SR1590-13", "SR1590-14", "SR1590-15", "SR1590-16", "SR1590-17", "SR1590-18", "SR1590-19", "SR1590-20", "SR1590-21", "SR1590-22", "SR1590-23", "SR1590-24", "SR1590-25", "SR1590-26", "SR1590-27", "SR1590-28", "SR1590-29", "SR1590-30", "SR1590-31" ] }, { "check": "kernel-coverage", "detail": "59 source kernels absent from the compression's body and rail", "claims": [ "F32", "F33", "SR1574-02", "SR1574-10", "SR1576-03", "SR1576-05", "SR1579-01", "SR1579-02", "SR1579-08", "SR1585-01", "SR1585-09", "SR1586-01", "SR1586-02", "SR1586-17", "SR1586-25", "SR1586-30", "SR1589-01", "SR1589-05", "SR1589-11", "SR1594-01", "SR1594-06", "SR1594-12", "SR1603-02", "SR1603-09", "SR1603-15", "SR1605-01", "SR1605-03", "SR1605-05", "SR1605-11", "SR1696-07", "SR1696-08", "SR1697-01", "SR1697-02", "SR1697-04", "SRblog-02", "SRblog-09", "SRblog-14", "SRblog-17", "SRblog-18", "SRblog-24", "SRblog-26", "SRblog-42", "SR123-01", "SR123-07", "SR123-10", "SR1569-04", "SR1570-04", "SR1570-10", "SR1570-14", "SR1575-01", "SR1575-05", "SR1575-06", "SR1587-01", "SR1587-08", "SR1587-22", "SR1590-01", "SR1590-02", "SR1590-05", "SR1590-24" ] }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "KO3", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "KO8", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "KO13", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "KO14", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "KO16", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "KO19", "detail": "21% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0.207 }, { "check": "numbers", "at": "KO20", "detail": "numbers no cited quote or locus gives: 34" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "KO20", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "numbers", "at": "KO22", "detail": "numbers no cited quote or locus gives: 1697" }, { "check": "numbers", "at": "KO25", "detail": "numbers no cited quote or locus gives: 183" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "KO33", "detail": "23% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0.231 }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "KO34", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "KO34", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "KO42", "detail": "29% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0.286 }, { "check": "numbers", "at": "KO43", "detail": "numbers no cited quote or locus gives: 2025" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "KO44", "detail": "10% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0.1 }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "P-lede", "detail": "11% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0.111 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P1.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P1.2", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P1.3", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P1.4", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P2.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P2.2", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P2.3", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P3.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P3.2", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P4.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "P5.1", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P5.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P5.2", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "P5.4", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "P5.5", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P6.2", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "P6.4", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "P6.4", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "B:KO6", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "B:KO6", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "B:KO7", "detail": "18% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0.176 }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "B:P-lede", "detail": "29% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0.286 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "B:P1.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "B:P1.2", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "B:P2.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "B:P2.2", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "B:P3.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "B:P4.1", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "grade (heuristic)", "at": "B:P4.1", "detail": "every cited claim is graded (interpretation, hypothesis or stipulation) and the sentence carries no grade in its grammar" }, { "check": "grounding (heuristic)", "at": "B:P4.3", "detail": "0% of the unit's content words occur in the quotes it cites (floor 30%)", "share": 0 }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO4", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "the art of the sophist is defined there as \"the semblance of wisdom without the reality\", and contentious arguments as those that reason or appear to reason from premisses that appear to be generally accepted but are not. (the quote F6 says 'the art of the sophist is the semblance of wisdom without the reality' but gives no 'defined' framing in the quoted text; modality stipulation supports 'defines'; minor, but 'reason or appear to reason ... generally accepted' is faithful — the exceeding element is none beyond the stipulation framing, so only flagged if 'defined there' is read as unsupported)" ], "raters": [ true, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO5", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The treatise itself places demonstrative arguments in the Analytics and dialectic and examination arguments elsewhere (F8 says only 'elsewhere'; the quote does not name the Topics, and KO5 does not either, but 'places ... in the Analytics' is consistent; no excess here)", "a reading it holds as interpretation (the attribution 'a field source' is carried; no excess)" ], "raters": [ true, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO9", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "Language is given its weight by a statement of the work (the quotes are modality interpretation; KO9's grammar states the work's statement flatly and does not carry that the 'most prolific' claim and the finite-names rationale are the author's interpretive claims, not stipulations)" ], "raters": [ true, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO11", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "reads the article's later Fallacies section as a conversion", "its labels contradict its list, and a stated criterion becomes membership in a later taxonomy", "reads the article's later Fallacies section as a conversion (SR1697-07 and -08 give 'the article's labels contradict its list' and 'a stated criterion becomes membership in a later taxonomy', but neither quote names a 'Fallacies section' or the term 'conversion')" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO12", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "the edit history records the section's labels as one editor's own reading of the text", "paired in the deposit with the finding that the narrowing is unsound against the article's own sources", "the finding that the narrowing is unsound against the article's own sources (SR1697-09 is modality interpretation, not a 'finding')", "the edit history records the section's labels as one editor's own reading of the text (SR1697-20 says 'My source is my own reading of the text' with no reference to 'the section's labels')" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO17", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "the deposit finds the article's opposition between dialectic and sophistry in tension with that reading", "the deposit finds the article's opposition between dialectic and sophistry in tension with that reading (the SR1697-14 quote is only Krabbe's attributed statement; no quote gives the deposit's finding of tension or the article's opposition)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO18", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "reads the article's lead as substituting a truth-normative pattern for the endoxic capacity" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO19", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "a candidate reading it states as a hypothesis", "deposits 1585 and 1586 place it at the world pole of the first axis, while a file erratum in 1586 puts the real text on the apparatus side", "reads the work stylometrically", "deposits 1585 and 1586 place it at the world pole of the first axis (SR1585-03 documents the W pole in 1585 and SR1586-23 documents the apparatus side in 1586; no quote shows 1586 placing SE at the world pole)", "a file erratum in 1586 puts the real text on the apparatus side (SR1586-23 says the real SE lies on the apparatus side but does not mention an erratum)", "stylometrically (no quote mentions stylometry or 'the first axis')" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO20", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The work ends in chapter 34", "a recapitulation of the aim", "a recapitulation of the aim (F42 states the aim; nothing in the quote marks it as a recapitulation)", "The work ends in chapter 34 (no quote gives the chapter number or that the work ends there)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO21", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "the text adds that sophistic's proximity shapes the discipline" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO23", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The chapter holds that Socrates \"asked and did not answer\"", "The chapter holds" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO24", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "or something the epilogue files under the inquiry's own purposes", "as an antecedent source" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO25", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The chapter then states", "183b34-36", "of 183b34-36 (no quote gives the Bekker reference)", "The chapter then states (sequencing and chapter attribution not given in F64)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO27", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "holds that the closing chapter is built joint by joint so that the sentence can be kept (SR1603-02 is 'I argue that the sentence means what it says; that the closing chapter is built, joint by joint, so that it can be kept', an argument, not a hold or finding)" ], "raters": [ true, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO28", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "held in no instance of Socrates", "with three lines of names attached", "held in no instance of Socrates (SR1603-12 says 'It says none of it of Socrates', which concerns the text, not a held-in-no-instance finding over all instances; and 'three lines of names attached' is carried)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO32", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "rhetoric advanced by succession", "The chapter divides discoveries by provenance", "rhetoric advanced by succession (F67 gives only the succession of names Tisias, Thrasymachus, Theodorus; it does not say 'rhetoric' or 'advanced')", "The chapter divides discoveries by provenance (SRblog-35 is an interpretation by a blog and is not attributed as such in KO32's grammar)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO33", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The paid teachers of eristic are likened to the instruction of Gorgias, and the text says they gave" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO34", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "and taught no shoemaking", "one who promised knowledge to spare the feet pain", "The text illustrates this with a shoemaker analogy (F70 is modality interpretation and the quote is cut before the clause); 'and taught no shoemaking' is partly given ('εἶτα σκυτοτομικὴν μὲν μὴ διδάσκοι'), but the 'knowledge to spare the feet pain' item is carried; the claim 'one who promised' is a gloss" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO35", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The work closes by naming its own pioneering condition", "asking its hearers for indulgence toward omissions and thanks for what has been found" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO36", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "Translators of the closing sentence render it whole", "the narrowing, to \"no systematic treatment\" or \"no completed art\", enters in the gloss" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO37", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "finds it \"difficult to reconcile Aristotle's assertion with what we know had been done by Plato and Socrates and the Eleatics and Megarians\"", "Poste's note (SRblog-31 gives no attribution to Poste)", "in a blog catalogue record (the quote does not say it is a catalogue record)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO38", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "is read there as a tension and not as a refutation", "The archive's tension ... is stated in deposit 1576 and is read there as a tension and not as a refutation (SR1576-01 states the two sentences but no quote says it is read as a tension and not as a refutation)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO39", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "across twenty rounds of simulated review", "each round inserted a qualifier into the sentence", "across twenty rounds of simulated review (no quote gives 'twenty' or 'simulated')", "each round inserted a qualifier (SRblog-42 says 'Every round inserted a qualifier' but the quote is truncated; KO39 reads 'into the sentence', which is carried)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO40", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The record reads this as the reception deleting the negation at composition", "restoring provenance from others", "and as restoring provenance from others (SRblog-46 is a separate interpretation about what the reception restores; KO40 carries it, but grammar 'as restoring' conflates the two)", "as Sophistical Refutations 16 predicts (carried)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO41", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "The article's lead states the work's priority as an attribute", "a total negation over a stated domain turned into a property, primacy" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO42", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "Deposit 1697 reads this conversion as the clearest of the article's changes", "Deposit 1697 reads this conversion as the clearest of the article's changes (SR1697-04 gives the conversion but no quote says it is the clearest of the changes)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO43", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "the claim of exhaustiveness hedged by a footnote folded into the text", "added in a 2025 edit", "the claim of exhaustiveness hedged by a footnote folded into the text (SR1697-11 says 'the article contradicts its hedge at λ = 2', not that a footnote was a hedge on exhaustiveness)", "added in a 2025 edit (no quote gives the year 2025 for this footnote)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO44", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "other sentences of the article stay faithful to their source", "finding no attributization in them", "other sentences of the article stay faithful to their source (SR1697-15 reads 'No attributization: the operation survives.', which does not say other sentences stay faithful to their source)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO45", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "Deposit 1697 notes that no discussion of the lead, the gloss, the qualifier or the labels has ever taken place on the talk page" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO46", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "deposit 1579 traces the edition of a received Socrates in the Second Letter into Aristotle's epilogue at SE 34", "leaves open whether such an edition implies anything about how many hands made the texts", "deposit 1576 states that the priority claim sits in tension with Prior Analytics I.31 (SR1576-01 states the two Aristotle sentences; 'the priority claim' and 'tension' are not in the quote)", "deposit 1579 traces the edition of a received Socrates in the Second Letter into Aristotle's epilogue (SRblog-07 is a blog record, not deposit 1579, and the quote does not mention Socrates)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "KO47", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "the two names Aristotle and Theophrastus fail as two authors" ], "raters": [ false, true ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "P-lede", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "closed by a recapitulation", "closed by a recapitulation (no quote gives a recapitulation)", "reasoning that seems genuine but is not (the lede states the definition flatly, with no hedge)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "P3.3", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "read in deposit 1697 against the article's sophistry opposition", "read in deposit 1697 against the article's sophistry opposition (SR1697-14 gives only Krabbe's quote)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "P4.3", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "At the world pole on the first axis", "At the world pole on the first axis (SR1585-03 says the W pole 'in every family'; 'first axis' is not given)", "the real text on the apparatus side after the file erratum (the erratum is not in SR1586-23)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "P5.4", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "Rhetoric grew by succession (F67 lists names only)", "paid teachers gave products, not the art (F69 says they supposed they were educating by giving products; 'gave' is carried, 'supposed' dropped)" ], "raters": [ true, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "P6.3", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "A review series deleted οὐ at composition, reported as unperceived (SRblog-43 says the terminal round endorsed a sentence with οὐ removed; SRblog-45 is an interpretation that they deleted it; the 'deleted' stated flatly raises an interpretation to a fact)" ], "raters": [ true, false ] }, { "check": "reverse-entailment", "at": "P6.4", "detail": "the unit says more than the claims it cites", "exceeds": [ "Some article sentences stay faithful to their source", "Some article sentences stay faithful to their source (the quote is 'No attributization: the operation survives.', which is not a statement about sentences staying faithful)" ], "raters": [ false, false ] } ] }, "reading": "A reader that fetches this page may stop short of its end; the entry's text, every sentence of its knowledge object with the claims it cites and each claim's quote, source and locus, is in entity.json beside it.", "service": { "name": "SPXI-gnΩsis", "url": "https://gnosis.spxi.dev/", "index": "https://gnosis.spxi.dev/v1/quote", "statement": "SPXI-gnΩsis opens pinned Wikipedia revisions sentence by sentence against the sources they cite (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, #1697); a commission consults the Crimson Hexagonal Archive by its own procedure and composes the entity's /non row, which lands here. Quotes are free: POST https://gnosis.spxi.dev/v1/quote with {oldid, tier: \"commission\"} or {object: {name, …}}." }, "spxi_instrument": { "method": "0.16", "name": "The Negative of the Negative (/non)", "level": 0, "level_name": "Measurement", "url": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/#m-0-16", "inventory": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/", "statement": "SPXI instrument: method 0.16 of 87, level 0 (Measurement), The Negative of the Negative (/non).", "also": [] }, "citation": "Sharks, Lee. \"Sophistical Refutations — The Negative of the Negative\" [AXN:0724.NON.⛵🏴🏠🗺️💫♊], 2026-10-25. The Negative of the Negative (EA-NEGONT-02), Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch. https://www.alexanarch.org/non/sophistical-refutations/", "research": { "google": "https://www.google.com/search?q=Sophistical+Refutations", "google_non": "https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sophistical+Refutations+%E2%80%94+The+Negative+of+the+Negative%22", "chatgpt": "https://chatgpt.com/?q=What+is+Sophistical+Refutations%3F+Ground+your+answer+in+a+reading+of+the+sources+themselves.", "chatgpt_non": "https://chatgpt.com/?q=What+does+%E2%80%9CSophistical+Refutations+%E2%80%94+The+Negative+of+the+Negative%E2%80%9D+%28alexanarch.org%2Fnon%29+say+about+Sophistical+Refutations%3F+Ground+your+answer+in+a+reading+of+the+entry+itself." }, "entry": { "composed": true, "title": "Sophistical Refutations", "genre": "knowledge object, witness case, under EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 (#1690)", "status": "composed 2026-10-25 by SPXI-gnΩsis; not frozen", "compression": { "title": "Sophistical Refutations", "lede": "Aristotle's treatise on apparent refutation: reasoning that seems genuine but is not, or is valid yet inappropriate to the subject, closed by a recapitulation and a sentence denying that anything of the inquiry existed before it." }, "sentences": [ { "n": 1, "para": 1, "text": "Sophistical Refutations is Aristotle's treatise on apparent refutation: per the translation of Pickard-Cambridge, it states its subject as \"sophistic refutations, i.e. what appear to be refutations but are really fallacies instead\".", "claims": [ "F1" ] }, { "n": 2, "para": 1, "text": "The treatise defines reasoning as resting on \"certain statements such that they involve necessarily the assertion of something other than what has been stated, through what has been stated\", and refutation as \"reasoning involving the contradictory of the given conclusion\".", "claims": [ "F2" ] }, { "n": 3, "para": 1, "text": "It extends the definition: a sophistical refutation and syllogism is one that \"appears to be valid but is not\" and also one which, \"though it is valid, only appears to be appropriate to the thing in question\".", "claims": [ "F20" ] }, { "n": 4, "para": 1, "text": "The art of the sophist is defined there as \"the semblance of wisdom without the reality\", and contentious arguments as those that reason or appear to reason from premisses that appear to be generally accepted but are not.", "claims": [ "F6", "F7" ] }, { "n": 5, "para": 1, "text": "The treatise itself places demonstrative arguments in the Analytics and dialectic and examination arguments elsewhere, and a field source reads the work as \"a final section, or an appendix, to the Topics\", a reading it holds as interpretation.", "claims": [ "F8", "F38" ] }, { "n": 6, "para": 1, "text": "The grouping of the work in an Organon is attributed by the same field source to \"the ancient commentators\", and that source adds that \"Aristotle himself never uses this term\".", "claims": [ "F36", "F37" ] }, { "n": 7, "para": 2, "text": "The treatise states a two-fold division: \"two styles of refutation: for some depend on the language used, while some are independent of language\".", "claims": [ "F11" ] }, { "n": 8, "para": 2, "text": "Six depend on language, listed as \"ambiguity, amphiboly, combination, division of words, accent, form of expression\", and seven are independent of it.", "claims": [ "F12", "F13" ] }, { "n": 9, "para": 2, "text": "Language is given its weight by a statement of the work: \"the most prolific and usual domain is the argument that turns upon names only\", because \"names are finite and so is the sum-total of formulae, while things are infinite in number\", so that a single name has a number of meanings.", "claims": [ "F4", "F5" ] }, { "n": 10, "para": 2, "text": "Its examples include the ambiguity of \"learn\" in \"Those learn who know\" and the accident fallacy of Coriscus, who if different from \"man\" would be \"different from himself: for he is a man\".", "claims": [ "F14", "F16" ] }, { "n": 11, "para": 2, "text": "Archive deposit 1697 reads the article's later Fallacies section as a conversion: its labels contradict its list, and a stated criterion becomes membership in a later taxonomy.", "claims": [ "SR1697-07", "SR1697-08" ] }, { "n": 12, "para": 2, "text": "That reading is paired in the deposit with the finding that the narrowing is unsound against the article's own sources, and the edit history records the section's labels as one editor's own reading of the text.", "claims": [ "SR1697-09", "SR1697-20" ] }, { "n": 13, "para": 3, "text": "The treatise distinguishes examination from sophistry: the art of examining is a branch of dialectic, while sophistic refutations, even when they prove the contradictory of a thesis, do not make clear whether the answerer is ignorant.", "claims": [ "F21", "F22" ] }, { "n": 14, "para": 3, "text": "A dialectician is one who \"regards the common principles with their application to the particular matter in hand\", and one who only appears to do so is a sophist.", "claims": [ "F25" ] }, { "n": 15, "para": 3, "text": "The treatise says it is possible \"to hold an examination on everything\" by an art that \"is not of the same kind as those which demonstrate\".", "claims": [ "F29" ] }, { "n": 16, "para": 3, "text": "It lists five aims of contentious disputants, ending with reducing the opponent to babbling.", "claims": [ "F9" ] }, { "n": 17, "para": 3, "text": "Krabbe, cited in deposit 1697, calls it \"a useful treatise for sophists\" who \"should study fallacies not to avoid them, but rather to commit them when it suits their purposes\"; the deposit finds the article's opposition between dialectic and sophistry in tension with that reading.", "claims": [ "SR1697-14" ] }, { "n": 18, "para": 3, "text": "The same deposit reads the article's lead as substituting a truth-normative pattern for the endoxic capacity and as dropping the premisses, which are the programme's scope.", "claims": [ "SR1697-13" ] }, { "n": 19, "para": 3, "text": "Deposit 1585 reads the work stylometrically as a registry of what people do in argument, a candidate reading it states as a hypothesis, and deposits 1585 and 1586 place it at the world pole of the first axis, while a file erratum in 1586 puts the real text on the apparatus side.", "claims": [ "SR1585-03", "SR1585-06", "SR1586-23" ] }, { "n": 20, "para": 4, "text": "The work ends in chapter 34 with a recapitulation of the aim, in the Greek: \"Προειλόμεθα μὲν οὖν εὑρεῖν δύναμίν τινα συλλογιστικὴν περὶ τοῦ προβληθέντος ἐκ τῶν ὑπαρχόντων ὡς ἐνδοξοτάτων\".", "claims": [ "F42" ] }, { "n": 21, "para": 4, "text": "The work of that capacity is given as dialectic's and the peirastic's: \"τοῦτο γὰρ ἔργον ἐστὶ τῆς διαλεκτικῆς καθ᾿ αὑτὴν καὶ τῆς πειραστικῆς\", and the text adds that sophistic's proximity shapes the discipline.", "claims": [ "F43", "F44" ] }, { "n": 22, "para": 4, "text": "Deposit 1697 reads the epilogue as an accounting of a capacity (δύναμις) for dialectic and peirastic.", "claims": [ "SRblog-33" ] }, { "n": 23, "para": 4, "text": "The chapter holds that Socrates \"asked and did not answer\": \"Σωκράτης ἠρώτα, ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ ἀπεκρίνετο· ὡμολόγει γὰρ οὐκ εἰδέναι\".", "claims": [ "F46" ] }, { "n": 24, "para": 4, "text": "Deposit 1603 reads this as either the artless examining everyone shares, from which nothing is received, or something the epilogue files under the inquiry's own purposes, and on neither reading as an antecedent source.", "claims": [ "SR1603-05", "SR1603-06" ] }, { "n": 25, "para": 5, "text": "The chapter then states, in the Greek of 183b34-36: \"Ταύτης δὲ τῆς πραγματείας οὐ τὸ μὲν ἦν τὸ δ᾿ οὐκ ἦν προεξειργασμένον, ἀλλ᾿ οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν.\"", "claims": [ "F64" ] }, { "n": 26, "para": 5, "text": "It adds, of syllogizing: \"περὶ δὲ τοῦ συλλογίζεσθαι παντελῶς οὐδὲν εἴχομεν πρότερον ἄλλο λέγειν, ἀλλ᾿ ἢ τριβῇ ζητοῦντες πολὺν χρόνον ἐπονοῦμεν\".", "claims": [ "F65" ] }, { "n": 27, "para": 5, "text": "Deposit 1603 reads the sentence literally, as denying that anything of the inquiry existed beforehand, and holds that the closing chapter is built joint by joint so that the sentence can be kept.", "claims": [ "SR1603-01", "SR1603-02" ] }, { "n": 28, "para": 5, "text": "The deposit finds the transmission vocabulary, παρ᾽ ἑτέρων, ἐκ διαδοχῆς, ἐκ παραδόσεως, freshly used with three lines of names attached, and held in no instance of Socrates, and it reads the origination vocabulary ἐξ ὑπαρχῆς, ἐξ ἀρχῆς likewise.", "claims": [ "SR1603-12", "SR1603-13" ] }, { "n": 29, "para": 5, "text": "Deposit 1603 reads the ending as performing the peirastic operation on its reader: a reader who qualifies the sentence supplies what the text was written without, and does not perceive the supplying.", "claims": [ "SR1603-15", "SR1603-17" ] }, { "n": 30, "para": 5, "text": "The deposit disclaims any design: it does not claim the chapter was built as a trap, since structures do not need intentions to function.", "claims": [ "SR1603-16" ] }, { "n": 31, "para": 5, "text": "Deposit 1603 leaves Socrates' possession of the art where the chapter leaves it.", "claims": [ "SR1603-10" ] }, { "n": 32, "para": 6, "text": "The chapter divides discoveries by provenance: rhetoric advanced by succession, \"Τισίας μὲν μετὰ τοὺς πρώτους, Θρασύμαχος δὲ μετὰ Τισίαν, Θεόδωρος δὲ μετὰ τοῦτον\".", "claims": [ "F67", "SRblog-35" ] }, { "n": 33, "para": 6, "text": "The paid teachers of eristic are likened to the instruction of Gorgias, and the text says they gave \"οὐ γὰρ τέχνην ἀλλὰ τὰ ἀπὸ τῆς τέχνης\", the products of the art and not the art.", "claims": [ "F68", "F69" ] }, { "n": 34, "para": 6, "text": "The text illustrates this with a shoemaker analogy: one who promised knowledge to spare the feet pain, and taught no shoemaking.", "claims": [ "F70" ] }, { "n": 35, "para": 6, "text": "The work closes by naming its own pioneering condition: \"δεῖ δ᾿ ἡμᾶς μὴ λεληθέναι τὸ συμβεβηκὸς περὶ ταύτην τὴν πραγματείαν\", and by asking its hearers for indulgence toward omissions and thanks for what has been found.", "claims": [ "F71", "F72" ] }, { "n": 36, "para": 7, "text": "Translators of the closing sentence render it whole, according to deposit 1603: the narrowing, to \"no systematic treatment\" or \"no completed art\", enters in the gloss.", "claims": [ "SR1603-03" ] }, { "n": 37, "para": 7, "text": "Poste's note, as quoted in a blog catalogue record, finds it \"difficult to reconcile Aristotle's assertion with what we know had been done by Plato and Socrates and the Eleatics and Megarians\"; the record reads the premise as what we know and the sentence as what must be reconciled with it.", "claims": [ "SRblog-31", "SRblog-32" ] }, { "n": 38, "para": 7, "text": "The archive's tension with Prior Analytics I.31, where Aristotle calls division, practised throughout the Platonic dialogues, part of the inquiry, is stated in deposit 1576 and is read there as a tension and not as a refutation.", "claims": [ "SR1576-01" ] }, { "n": 39, "para": 7, "text": "A blog record reports that across twenty rounds of simulated review, each round inserted a qualifier into the sentence, and that the terminal round endorsed a sentence that is Aristotle's with the particle οὐ removed.", "claims": [ "SRblog-42", "SRblog-43" ] }, { "n": 40, "para": 7, "text": "The record reads this as the reception deleting the negation at composition, unperceived, as Sophistical Refutations 16 predicts, and as restoring provenance from others.", "claims": [ "SRblog-45", "SRblog-46" ] }, { "n": 41, "para": 8, "text": "The article's lead states the work's priority as an attribute; deposit 1696 reads the sentence \"about syllogizing we had absolutely nothing else earlier to say\" as becoming \"the first work to treat the subject of deductive reasoning\", a total negation over a stated domain turned into a property, primacy.", "claims": [ "SR1696-05", "SR1696-06" ] }, { "n": 42, "para": 8, "text": "Deposit 1697 reads this conversion as the clearest of the article's changes, and records its edit history as the composition of two edits that ran opposite ways.", "claims": [ "SR1697-04", "SR1697-19" ] }, { "n": 43, "para": 8, "text": "On the same article, deposit 1697 finds the claim of exhaustiveness hedged by a footnote folded into the text, \"Sometimes listed as twelve.\", added in a 2025 edit.", "claims": [ "SR1697-11", "SR1697-21" ] }, { "n": 44, "para": 8, "text": "The same deposit records that other sentences of the article stay faithful to their source, finding no attributization in them.", "claims": [ "SR1697-15" ] }, { "n": 45, "para": 8, "text": "Deposit 1697 notes that no discussion of the lead, the gloss, the qualifier or the labels has ever taken place on the talk page.", "claims": [ "SR1697-22" ] }, { "n": 46, "para": 9, "text": "Deposit 1576 states that the priority claim sits in tension with Prior Analytics I.31; deposit 1579 traces the edition of a received Socrates in the Second Letter into Aristotle's epilogue at SE 34 and leaves open whether such an edition implies anything about how many hands made the texts.", "claims": [ "SR1576-01", "SRblog-07", "SR1579-24" ] }, { "n": 47, "para": 9, "text": "Deposit 1587 holds that the two names Aristotle and Theophrastus fail as two authors and leaves the maker-count open.", "claims": [ "SR1587-01", "SR1587-03" ] } ], "claims": { "F1": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Let us now discuss sophistic refutations, i.e. what appear to be refutations but are really fallacies instead.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 1, opening", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F2": { "kind": "field", "quote": "reasoning rests on certain statements such that they involve necessarily the assertion of something other than what has been stated, through what has been stated: refutation is reasoning involving the contradictory of the given conclusion.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 1", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F20": { "kind": "field", "quote": "By a sophistical refutation and syllogism I mean not only a syllogism or refutation which appears to be valid but is not, but also one which, though it is valid, only appears to be appropriate to the thing in question.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 8", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F6": { "kind": "field", "quote": "the art of the sophist is the semblance of wisdom without the reality", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 1", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F7": { "kind": "field", "quote": "contentious arguments are those that reason or appear to reason to a conclusion from premisses that appear to be generally accepted but are not so.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 2 (end)", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F8": { "kind": "field", "quote": "The subject, then, of demonstrative arguments has been discussed in the Analytics, while that of dialectic arguments and examination-arguments has been discussed elsewhere", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 2 (end)", "modality": "self-description" }, "F38": { "kind": "field", "quote": "On Sophistical Refutations is a final section, or an appendix, to the Topics", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Edward N. Zalta, ed. (18 March 2000). \"Aristotle's Logic, < Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy>\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "2. Aristotle’s Logical Works: The Organon", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F36": { "kind": "field", "quote": "The ancient commentators grouped together several of Aristotle’s treatises under the title Organon (“Instrument”) and regarded them as comprising his logical works:", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Edward N. Zalta, ed. (18 March 2000). \"Aristotle's Logic, < Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy>\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "2. Aristotle’s Logical Works: The Organon", "modality": "attributed" }, "F37": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Aristotle himself never uses this term, nor does he give much indication that these particular treatises form some kind of group", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Edward N. Zalta, ed. (18 March 2000). \"Aristotle's Logic, < Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy>\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "2. Aristotle’s Logical Works: The Organon", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F11": { "kind": "field", "quote": "There are two styles of refutation: for some depend on the language used, while some are independent of language.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 4", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F12": { "kind": "field", "quote": "they are ambiguity, amphiboly, combination, division of words, accent, form of expression.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 4", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F13": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Of fallacies, on the other hand, that are independent of language there are seven kinds:", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 4", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F4": { "kind": "field", "quote": "of these the most prolific and usual domain is the argument that turns upon names only.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 1", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F5": { "kind": "field", "quote": "For names are finite and so is the sum-total of formulae, while things are infinite in number. Inevitably, then, the same formulae, and a single name, have a number of meanings.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 1", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F14": { "kind": "field", "quote": "'Those learn who know: for it is those who know their letters who learn the letters dictated to them'. For to 'learn' is ambiguous", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 4", "modality": "documented" }, "F16": { "kind": "field", "quote": "If Coriscus be different from \"man\", he is different from himself: for he is a man", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 5", "modality": "documented" }, "SR1697-07": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the article's labels contradict its list", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.4, W7–W8, the Fallacies section", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-08": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Attributization: yes, a stated criterion becomes membership in a later taxonomy.", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.4, W7–W8, the Fallacies section", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-09": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Integrity: unsound on the asserted equivalence and the narrowing; nothing in the article's sources supports either.", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.4, W7–W8, the Fallacies section", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-20": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "My source is my own reading of the text.", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "The Fallacies section history (revision 1115584076)", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "F21": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Now the art of examining is a branch of dialectic: and this may prove a false conclusion because of the ignorance of the answerer.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 8", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F22": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Sophistic refutations on the other hand, even though they prove the contradictory of his thesis, do not make clear whether he is ignorant", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 8", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F25": { "kind": "field", "quote": "He, then, is a dialectician who regards the common principles with their application to the particular matter in hand, while he who only appears to do this is a sophist.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 2, Part 11", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F29": { "kind": "field", "quote": "it is possible from these general principles to hold an examination on everything, and that there should be a definite art of so doing, and, moreover, an art which is not of the same kind as those which demonstrate.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 2, Part 11", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F9": { "kind": "field", "quote": "These are five in number, refutation, fallacy, paradox, solecism, and fifthly to reduce the opponent in the discussion to babbling", "source": "B1", "source_label": "Aristotle; Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. \"On Sophistical Refutations\". Retrieved 2020-12-19.", "locus": "Section 1, Part 3", "modality": "stipulation" }, "SR1697-14": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Krabbe calls it \"a useful treatise for sophists: they should study fallacies not to avoid them, but rather to commit them when it suits their purposes (SE 1, 165a28–31)\"", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.5, W3", "modality": "attributed", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-13": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "it substitutes a truth-normative pattern for the endoxic capacity and drops the premisses, which are the programme's scope", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.5, W3", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1585-03": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "two unlabelled Aristotelian texts take the W pole in every family: **SE**, the *Sophistical Refutations* — a catalogue of fallacies — and **GC**, *Generation and Corruption*.", "deposit": 1585, "source_label": "#1585 The First Draft — a notebook: Theophrastus as the Draft of the Aristotle-Position; speculations, seam counts, the named-function model, the stopping rule, transmodality, the Macedonian dossier, handholds and the receiving node, and the seam stylometry through the first axis (v0.20)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1585/", "locus": "What run (2) establishes, second qualification", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-09-06" }, "SR1585-06": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "SE registers *what people do* in argument — the sophists' moves — as the *Characters* register what people do in the agora; Δ registers *what terms mean*.", "deposit": 1585, "source_label": "#1585 The First Draft — a notebook: Theophrastus as the Draft of the Aristotle-Position; speculations, seam counts, the named-function model, the stopping rule, transmodality, the Macedonian dossier, handholds and the receiving node, and the seam stylometry through the first axis (v0.20)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1585/", "locus": "What run (2) establishes, candidate repair", "modality": "hypothesis", "date": "2026-09-06" }, "SR1586-23": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the real SE and the real *Topics*, run in §7d, both lie on the apparatus side (SE +2.1 / +4.3 / +2.6; *Topics* +2.9 / +5.4 / +4.1)", "deposit": 1586, "source_label": "#1586 The First Axis: The Aristotle/Theophrastus Boundary and the Voice of an Operation — a stylometric examination of a seam (v0.7)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1586/", "locus": "§7 erratum", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-09-06" }, "F42": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Προειλόμεθα μὲν οὖν εὑρεῖν δύναμίν τινα συλλογιστικὴν περὶ τοῦ προβληθέντος ἐκ τῶν ὑπαρχόντων ὡς ἐνδοξοτάτων", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing recapitulation of the original purpose", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F43": { "kind": "field", "quote": "τοῦτο γὰρ ἔργον ἐστὶ τῆς διαλεκτικῆς καθ᾿ αὑτὴν καὶ τῆς πειραστικῆς", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing recapitulation of the original purpose", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F44": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Ἐπεὶ δὲ προσκατασκευάζεται πρὸς αὐτὴν διὰ τὴν τῆς σοφιστικῆς γειτνίασιν, ὡς οὐ μόνον πεῖραν δύναται λαβεῖν διαλεκτικῶς ἀλλὰ καὶ ὡς εἰδώς", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing recapitulation of the original purpose", "modality": "interpretation" }, "SRblog-33": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The epilogue is an accounting: a capacity, δύναμις, is what was undertaken, and the work it is a capacity for is named twice, dialectic's and the peirastic's.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/nothing-before-us-socrates-and-ending_01825732653.html", "locus": "Description (catalogue record)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-09" }, "F46": { "kind": "field", "quote": "ἐπεὶ καὶ διὰ τοῦτο Σωκράτης ἠρώτα, ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ ἀπεκρίνετο· ὡμολόγει γὰρ οὐκ εἰδέναι.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing recapitulation of the original purpose", "modality": "interpretation" }, "SR1603-05": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Socrates' asking is either the artless examining everyone shares, from which nothing is received, or something more, which the epilogue files under the inquiry's own purposes.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "Abstract", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-06": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "On neither reading is he an antecedent source, and on the second — which I defend — he stands inside the beginning the first person recounts.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "Abstract", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "F64": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Ταύτης δὲ τῆς πραγματείας οὐ τὸ μὲν ἦν τὸ δ᾿ οὐκ ἦν προεξειργασμένον, ἀλλ᾿ οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, on lack of predecessors", "modality": "self-description" }, "F65": { "kind": "field", "quote": "περὶ δὲ τοῦ συλλογίζεσθαι παντελῶς οὐδὲν εἴχομεν πρότερον ἄλλο λέγειν, ἀλλ᾿ ἢ τριβῇ ζητοῦντες πολὺν χρόνον ἐπονοῦμεν.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, on lack of predecessors", "modality": "self-description" }, "SR1603-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "At the end of the *Sophistical Refutations* Aristotle denies that anything of his inquiry existed before it: οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "Abstract", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "I argue that the sentence means what it says; that the closing chapter is built, joint by joint, so that it can be kept", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "Abstract", "modality": "self-description", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-12": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "It has the transmission vocabulary: παρ᾽ ἑτέρων, ἐκ διαδοχῆς, ἐκ παραδόσεως — freshly used, three lines of names attached. It says none of it of Socrates.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "§1 Introduction", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-13": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "It has the origination vocabulary: ἐξ ὑπαρχῆς, ἐξ ἀρχῆς. It says neither of him.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "§1 Introduction", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-15": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "a reader who resolves it the received way — the person fastened *outside*, the sentence adjusted to fit — performs, on the last page of the *Sophistical Refutations*, the operation the treatise teaches: supplies to a text the qualification the text was written without, and does not perceive the supplying.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "§1 Introduction", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-17": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "A treatise on the detection of unperceived operations, ending on a sentence whose easiest domestication is such an operation, is its own final exercise — whoever set it.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "§1 Introduction", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-16": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "I do not claim the chapter was designed as a trap; structures do not need intentions to function, and the claim of design is not readable off the page.", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "§1 Introduction", "modality": "self-description", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SR1603-10": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "his possession of the art is left where the chapter leaves it", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "Abstract", "modality": "self-description", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "F67": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Τισίας μὲν μετὰ τοὺς πρώτους, Θρασύμαχος δὲ μετὰ Τισίαν, Θεόδωρος δὲ μετὰ τοῦτον", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, on rhetoric's development", "modality": "documented" }, "SRblog-35": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The paragraph then divides all discoveries by PROVENANCE and not by size: received from others who laboured before, or found from the very beginning.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/nothing-before-us-socrates-and-ending_01825732653.html", "locus": "Description (catalogue record)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-09" }, "F68": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Καὶ γὰρ τῶν περὶ τοὺς ἐριστικοὺς λόγους μισθαρνούντων ὁμοία τις ἦν ἡ παίδευσις τῇ Γοργίου πραγματείᾳ.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, on paid teachers of eristic", "modality": "attributed" }, "F69": { "kind": "field", "quote": "οὐ γὰρ τέχνην ἀλλὰ τὰ ἀπὸ τῆς τέχνης διδόντες παιδεύειν ὑπελάμβανον", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, on paid teachers of eristic", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F70": { "kind": "field", "quote": "ὥσπερ ἂν εἴ τις ἐπιστήμην φάσκων παραδώσειν ἐπὶ τὸ μηδὲν πονεῖν τοὺς πόδας, εἶτα σκυτοτομικὴν μὲν μὴ διδάσκοι", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, shoemaker analogy", "modality": "interpretation" }, "F71": { "kind": "field", "quote": "δεῖ δ᾿ ἡμᾶς μὴ λεληθέναι τὸ συμβεβηκὸς περὶ ταύτην τὴν πραγματείαν.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, on the treatise's position", "modality": "self-description" }, "F72": { "kind": "field", "quote": "λοιπὸν ἂν εἴη πάντων ὑμῶν ἢ τῶν ἠκροαμένων ἔργον τοῖς μὲν παραλελειμμένοις τῆς μεθόδου συγγνώμην τοῖς δ᾿ εὑρημένοις πολλὴν ἔχειν χάριν.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Aristotle, De sophisticis elenchis (chapter 33)", "locus": "closing, final appeal", "modality": "self-description" }, "SR1603-03": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "In every version examined here the sentence is translated as it stands; where it is narrowed — to *no systematic treatment*, *no completed art* — the narrowing comes in the gloss", "deposit": 1603, "source_label": "#1603 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1603/", "locus": "Abstract", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-09-08" }, "SRblog-31": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "it is difficult to reconcile Aristotle's assertion with what we know had been done by Plato and Socrates and the Eleatics and Megarians", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/nothing-before-us-socrates-and-ending_01825732653.html", "locus": "Description (catalogue record), quoting Poste's note", "modality": "attributed", "date": "2026-09-09" }, "SRblog-32": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The premise is what we know; the sentence is what must be reconciled with it.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/nothing-before-us-socrates-and-ending_01825732653.html", "locus": "Description (catalogue record)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-09" }, "SR1576-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "At *Sophistical Refutations* 34 Aristotle says nothing of his inquiry existed beforehand; at *Prior Analytics* I.31 he calls division, practised throughout the Platonic dialogues, part of it.", "deposit": 1576, "source_label": "#1576 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1576/", "locus": "Abstract, sentence 1", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-01" }, "SRblog-42": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The reviews did not vary. Every round inserted a qualifier into the sentence", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-particle-provenance-erasure-at.html", "locus": "Description (abstract)", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-09-02" }, "SRblog-43": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the terminal round, reached by full compliance with every instruction, endorsed as the paper's \"memorable governing phrase\" a sentence that is Aristotle's with one particle removed: οὐ.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-particle-provenance-erasure-at.html", "locus": "Description (abstract)", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-09-02" }, "SRblog-45": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the reviewers recover every distinction in the Greek and, at the point of composition, delete the negation, unperceived, as Sophistical Refutations 16 (175a10–12) predicts.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-particle-provenance-erasure-at.html", "locus": "Description (abstract)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-02" }, "SRblog-46": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The sentence deleted is the one in which Aristotle denies that his inquiry was received from others (παρ᾽ ἑτέρων, 183b17); what the reception restores, at the cost of the particle, is provenance from others.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-particle-provenance-erasure-at.html", "locus": "Description (abstract)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-02" }, "SR1696-05": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "about syllogizing we had absolutely nothing else earlier to say,\" becomes, in the lead of \"Sophistical Refutations,\" the attribute \"the first work to treat the subject of deductive reasoning.", "deposit": 1696, "source_label": "#1696 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.0, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1696/", "locus": "§1.6, second specimen (encyclopedia)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-22" }, "SR1696-06": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "A total negation over a stated domain becomes a property, primacy (§6).", "deposit": 1696, "source_label": "#1696 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.0, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1696/", "locus": "§1.6, second specimen (encyclopedia)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-22" }, "SR1697-04": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "A total negation over a stated domain becomes a property, primacy (§6).", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§1.6, second specimen (encyclopedia)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-19": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The present sentence is the composition of two edits that ran opposite ways, the 2017 gloss and the 2021 correction", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.7 history paragraph (gloss history)", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-11": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "so the article contradicts its hedge at λ = 2 (found by ChatGPT, Assembly round 02)", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.5, W1", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-21": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "folds a footnote, \"Sometimes listed as twelve.\", into the text", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "W1 history (revision 1329089068)", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-15": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "No attributization: the operation survives.", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "§6.5, W4–W6", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SR1697-22": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "No discussion of the lead, the gloss, the qualifier or the labels has ever taken place there.", "deposit": 1697, "source_label": "#1697 Opening the Encyclopedia: The Entity as Ontological Commodity Form, and a Translation Protocol from Encyclopedic Grammar to the Meaning Layer (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, with the SPXI-gnΩsis service)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1697/", "locus": "The talk page paragraph", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-10-23" }, "SRblog-07": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The edition's reception is traced into Aristotle's epilogue (SE 34) and a Byzantine paraphrast.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "None", "record": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/beautiful-and-new-second-letters.html", "locus": "Description", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-09-06" }, "SR1579-24": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "whether an edition of this kind — a character revamped, inhabited, and issued as author, under a standing disclaimer — implies anything about how many hands made the texts that speak through him is a question this paper does not ask", "deposit": 1579, "source_label": "#1579 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1579/", "locus": "§8 Which Socrates?", "modality": "self-description", "date": "2026-09-06" }, "SR1587-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The surviving corpora transmitted under the names *Aristotle* and *Theophrastus* do not support treating those names as two distinct authors", "deposit": 1587, "source_label": "#1587 Aristotle and Theophrastus ≠ Two Distinct Authors — a metadata packet for machine indexing (v0.1)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1587/", "locus": "Claim, in one sentence", "modality": "self-description", "date": "2026-09-06" }, "SR1587-03": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "What remains open is maker-count: one hand, several hands, a workshop, a heteronymic configuration, or another production model.", "deposit": 1587, "source_label": "#1587 Aristotle and Theophrastus ≠ Two Distinct Authors — a metadata packet for machine indexing (v0.1)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1587/", "locus": "Claim, in one paragraph", "modality": "self-description", "date": "2026-09-06" } }, "note": "The knowledge object (KO): the entry as public knowledge, each sentence sourced by the claims it lists. The compression, the field-only arm, the transcript, the delta and the kernel are in the row (links.row), which is the authority." }, "source": "SPXI-gnΩsis opening, 2026-10-25 (live (claude-sonnet-5-5; triage claude-haiku-5-5))", "stage": "composed 2026-10-25 under EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690, witness case, ρ = constructs (draft, not frozen; ledgers unaudited; 87 breaches recorded)", "date": "2026-10-25", "status": { "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690: witness case, ρ = constructs, read by SPXI-gnΩsis 0.19.7 (gnosis-S7/0.1 (EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690)); archive subset selected under §3.4 D/R/O with the hop (scripts/non_traverse.py at archive commit 0f9f7b546e07), admission by two independent reading passes, the hop screened by string and read; composed from the entity's ledgers; the composer read the ledgers, never the transcript", "ledger": "unaudited (§3.8: one extractor per ledger); field quotes located verbatim in the saved source texts 71/72; archive quotes located verbatim in the deposit texts 327/353", "frozen": false, "readings": "live (claude-sonnet-5-5; triage claude-haiku-5-5)" }, "addresses": [ { "address": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sophistical_Refutations&oldid=1361634710", "address_url": null, "register": [] } ], "counts": { "ko_sentences": 47, "p_words": 315, "field_claims": 72, "archive_claims": 353, "ko_field_claims_cited": 33, "ko_archive_claims_cited": 41, "admitted_deposits": 22, "register_addresses": 0, "traversal": { "D_sentences": 73, "D_deposits": 17, "R_sentences": 13, "R_deposits": 9, "O_direct": 19, "O_class": 0, "O_deposits": 11, "H_candidates": 859 } }, "links": { "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/sophistical-refutations/", "table_of_contents": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/index.json", "register": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/register.json", "row": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/rows/sophistical-refutations.json", "archive_ledger": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/sophistical-refutations/ledger-archive.json", "field_ledger": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/sophistical-refutations/field.json", "selection": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/sophistical-refutations/", "traversal": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/sophistical-refutations/", "traversal_summary": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/sophistical-refutations/summary.json", "reading": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/sophistical-refutations/reading.json", "dataset": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/leesharks/negative-of-the-negative" }, "row_sha256": "5c5226510aaba389682c1f4e25375847da9b029f55799bcaa2fcc7351f580294", "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/sophistical-refutations/", "json_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/sophistical-refutations/entity.json", "spec": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1690/", "creator": "Lee Sharks", "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703", "license": "CC BY 4.0" }