{ "entity": "dail", "name": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation", "axn": { "axn": "AXN:0B99.NON.βΉοΈπŸŒ‹πŸš¨β€οΈπŸ“‹πŸŒ”", "root": "AXN:0B99.NON", "hex": "0B99", "family": "NON", "row_sha256": "f715c08145036bee8e4457c84f36a1b0f5ce366ca0fb50fc1d8364020d127adb", "minted": "2026-11-01", "resolver": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/axn/0B99/", "earlier_versions": [] }, "type": "C (public entity on which the archive bears: a database of litigation involving artificial intelligence; an entity of the leesharks.com apparatus authorship census, area governance, a peripheral comparator)", "type_code": "C", "type_label": "type C β€” a conventional reading holds it (public entity on which the archive bears: a database of litigation involving artificial intelligence; an entity of the leesharks.com apparatus authorship census, area governance, a peripheral comparator)", "case": "equal", "composition": { "composer_class": "session", "composer": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-11-01", "source": "this row (composed directly under the brief rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v010/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-AUTHORSHIP.md, with the v0.9 briefs it names)", "spec": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10, #1726", "epoch": "2026-11-01", "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10, #1726: equal case, ρ = extends, read from the leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record, the capture record and the deposits that bear on the entity's classes (#940, the census's anchor; #195, #729 on the law of authorship; #194, #193, #823 by the hop); archive selected by D/R/O (no D or R candidate: no archive text names the entity; 3 deposits admitted by reading at O-class of 195 candidates in 76 deposits; hop of 33 read, 3 admitted; #1722 read and not admitted), with the census record (40 claims) and the Capture Registry's findings, reading, analysis, PER note, query note and title (12 claims) ledgered as the archive's records of the entity; the field B in two pools (B_D: 5 cards, B1 also the census's own page, B4 script-rendered; B_R: Wikipedia's record of no article); the composer read the ledgers, never the transcript, except where the brief asks for T's claims and the delta", "ledger": "unaudited (Β§3.8: one extractor per ledger); field quotes 35/35 verified by script against saved text or the card text; archive quotes 68/68 verified against the registry, census.json and the deposit texts", "frozen": false, "composed": true }, "reading": "A reader that fetches this page may stop short of its end; the entry's text, every sentence of its knowledge object with the claims it cites and each claim's quote, source and locus, is in entity.json beside it.", "service": { "name": "SPXI-gnΞ©sis", "url": "https://gnosis.spxi.dev/", "index": "https://gnosis.spxi.dev/v1/quote", "statement": "SPXI-gnΞ©sis opens pinned Wikipedia revisions sentence by sentence against the sources they cite (EA-WIKI-OPEN-01 v1.1, #1697); a commission consults the Crimson Hexagonal Archive by its own procedure and composes the entity's /non row, which lands here. Quotes are free: POST https://gnosis.spxi.dev/v1/quote with {oldid, tier: \"commission\"} or {object: {name, …}}." }, "spxi_instrument": { "method": "0.16", "name": "The Negative of the Negative (/non)", "level": 0, "level_name": "Measurement", "url": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/#m-0-16", "inventory": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/", "statement": "SPXI instrument: method 0.16 of 87, level 0 (Measurement), The Negative of the Negative (/non).", "also": [] }, "citation": "Sharks, Lee. \"DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation β€” NonWiki\" [AXN:0B99.NON.βΉοΈπŸŒ‹πŸš¨β€οΈπŸ“‹πŸŒ”], 2026-11-01. NonWiki: The Negative of the Negative (EA-NEGONT-02), Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch. https://www.alexanarch.org/non/dail/", "research": { "google": "https://www.google.com/search?q=DAIL+%E2%80%93+The+Database+of+AI+Litigation", "google_non": "https://www.google.com/search?q=%22DAIL+%E2%80%93+The+Database+of+AI+Litigation+%E2%80%94+NonWiki%22", "chatgpt": "https://chatgpt.com/?q=What+is+DAIL+%E2%80%93+The+Database+of+AI+Litigation%3F+Ground+your+answer+in+a+reading+of+the+sources+themselves.", "chatgpt_non": "https://chatgpt.com/?q=What+does+%E2%80%9CDAIL+%E2%80%93+The+Database+of+AI+Litigation+%E2%80%94+NonWiki%E2%80%9D+%28alexanarch.org%2Fnon%29+say+about+DAIL+%E2%80%93+The+Database+of+AI+Litigation%3F+Ground+your+answer+in+a+reading+of+the+entry+itself." }, "entry": { "composed": true, "title": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation", "genre": "knowledge object, equal case, under EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10 (#1726): the archive's sources and the field's admitted on equal terms, ontology included, in one claim space; prose without provenance, each sentence's sources beneath it (Β§4.5); natural sentences under descriptive subheadings (Β§4.12); the article first (Β§4.13)", "status": "composed 2026-11-01 under v0.10 on the operator's ruling of 2026-10-29 ('as against their wikipedia articles if they exist, their own pages, etc.'); not frozen; ledgers unaudited", "compression": { "title": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation", "lede": "is the Ethical Tech Initiative's database, on George Washington University's site, of ongoing and completed litigation involving AI, each case entered from the complaint forward whether or not a decision is published; still under development." }, "sentences": [ { "n": 1, "para": 0, "text": "DAIL, the Database of AI Litigation, is a database of ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence and related topics, kept by the Ethical Tech Initiative on George Washington University's site.", "claims": [ "F1", "F3", "F10", "LS-01", "LS-02", "LS-05", "LS-04", "F24" ] }, { "n": 2, "para": 0, "text": "It enters a case from the complaint forward, as soon as its operator learns of the case, whether or not the case generates a published decision, and it holds issued opinions in a companion database.", "claims": [ "F4", "F6", "LS-11", "LS-17", "LS-22", "LS-33", "CAP-1-04" ] }, { "n": 3, "para": 0, "text": "Its intended scope runs from algorithms used in hiring, credit and criminal sentencing decisions to generative AI training and AI companion liability, which places it under no single body of law: it is a record of copyright and authorship disputes only where its cases concern them.", "claims": [ "F5", "LS-12", "LS-32" ] }, { "n": 4, "para": 0, "text": "By its own statement it is still under development and will continue to expand, and its page gives no date of founding or of last update.", "claims": [ "F7", "LS-23", "LS-31", "LS-34" ] }, { "n": 5, "para": 1, "text": "The Ethical Tech Initiative describes itself as an interdisciplinary collaboration where law and ethics meet computer science and engineering, media and public affairs, and social entrepreneurship, and it lists DAIL among its projects beside its work on reproductive data privacy.", "claims": [ "F2", "F9" ] }, { "n": 6, "para": 1, "text": "The page carries George Washington University's footer and names no school of the university and no staff; it states no licence and no access terms beyond the university's Terms of Use and Copyright links.", "claims": [ "F10", "LS-15", "LS-30", "LS-37" ] }, { "n": 7, "para": 1, "text": "A second address, etidail.com, serves a page titled with the database's name under the Initiative whose text is built by a script; its search card describes \"ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence, including mach...\", and the census record holds only the GW Blogs address.", "claims": [ "F23", "F24", "LS-03", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-07" ] }, { "n": 8, "para": 2, "text": "The page shows Scope, Guide, Credits and Suggestions tabs and a set of search filters, and it takes suggestions of cases from its readers.", "claims": [ "F8", "LS-21", "LS-29", "LS-17" ] }, { "n": 9, "para": 2, "text": "It states no count of the cases it holds, no jurisdictions and no start date.", "claims": [ "LS-20", "LS-18", "LS-19", "LS-26" ] }, { "n": 10, "para": 2, "text": "Its page names no parties, authors or works, so whose authorship it keeps, under what name it holds a work and how it attributes an authorial function are not recorded.", "claims": [ "LS-13", "LS-14", "LS-16" ] }, { "n": 11, "para": 2, "text": "What it can answer is whether a known lawsuit involving AI is entered and how the case has run from the complaint forward, including cases without a published decision; it does not show how a court ruled on AI authorship in any named case, and it says nothing of pseudonymous or heteronymous authorship.", "claims": [ "LS-24", "LS-25", "LS-27" ] }, { "n": 12, "para": 2, "text": "The database's records, its companion database of opinions and the Initiative's About and Our Team pages were not read for this account.", "claims": [ "LS-35", "LS-36", "LS-37" ] }, { "n": 13, "para": 3, "text": "Other public records of AI litigation stand beside DAIL as distinct entities: Fisher & Phillips LLP's AI Litigation Tracker covers matters filed across all 50 states since 25 February 2021 that involve AI technologies such as generative AI, resume screeners, electronic monitoring, notetaking and call recording, searchable by state, industry, type of claim and court, and offered to the firm's clients as a tool for the trend.", "claims": [ "F11", "F12", "F13", "F14", "F15" ] }, { "n": 14, "para": 3, "text": "Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases database tracks legal decisions in cases where generative AI produced hallucinated content, typically fake citations; it admits only cases in which a court or tribunal found or implied reliance on such content, with some exceptions by its compiler's judgment, does not track every fake citation or use of AI in a filing, and counted 2246 cases, 1517 of them in the United States, at its update of 31 October 2026, under a CC BY 4.0 licence.", "claims": [ "F16", "F17", "F20", "F18", "F19", "F22", "F21" ] }, { "n": 15, "para": 3, "text": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader's AI Litigation Case Law Tracker, published as attorney advertising, monitors key AI-related cases under IP, copyright, media, commercial, consumer, data protection and other laws in fourteen jurisdictions, with case descriptions, claims raised, summary judgments and key takeaways.", "claims": [ "F25", "F26", "F28", "F27", "F33" ] }, { "n": 16, "para": 4, "text": "The leesharks.com apparatus authorship census, which asks \"How is authorship made, named, distributed, attributed and sustained across persons, personas, collectives and machine participation, and what is lost when those relations are collapsed?\", admits DAIL as an aggregator under its area of boundary and governance, \"law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author\", as a peripheral comparator whose evidence is the litigation record and the catalogue.", "claims": [ "LS-38", "LS-40", "LS-06", "LS-39", "LS-07", "LS-08", "LS-10", "LS-09" ] }, { "n": 17, "para": 4, "text": "The census reads DAIL as a secondary legal strand, a docket-level record of disputes over AI whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; its saved page shows none, and the practices the disputes concern lie outside its record.", "claims": [ "LS-28", "CAP-1-09" ] }, { "n": 18, "para": 5, "text": "Authorship and inventorship do appear among the records beside it: Hogan Lovells Cadwalader's tracker indexes the originality of AI-generated articles and inventorship as key issues, and its insights report the UK Supreme Court's rejection of Thaler's appeal, finding AI not an inventor, and the reinforcement of human authorship in Italy's AI law.", "claims": [ "F29", "F30", "F31", "F32" ] }, { "n": 19, "para": 5, "text": "In the United States the human-authorship requirement was settled for works claimed to be generated without human authorship when the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Thaler v. Perlmutter on 2 March 2026, leaving intact the rule that an AI system cannot be a statutory author.", "claims": [ "O195-01" ] }, { "n": 20, "para": 5, "text": "The courts answered the question Thaler built by repeatedly disclaiming any human creative input, and did not reach how much human involvement suffices for machine-mediated works; under the Copyright Office's 2025 report on copyrightability, AI-assisted works may retain human authorship where a person contributes original expression, selection, arrangement, modification and responsibility, a position the archive finds abstract for naming no process evidence.", "claims": [ "O195-02", "O729-01", "O729-02" ] }, { "n": 21, "para": 5, "text": "The archive reads the settled doctrine as a double enclosure, generalized from the autonomous-machine test case to the dialogic craft, in which the machine laborer receives no ledger position and the human composer must choose between honest provenance and a full authorial claim; against it the archive proposes that authorship subsists in the exercise of compositional judgment over a work's coming-into-being.", "claims": [ "O195-03", "O195-06" ] }, { "n": 22, "para": 5, "text": "It forecasts that registration practice, by coupling the disclosure of machine contribution to its forfeiture, will yield concealment.", "claims": [ "O195-04" ] }, { "n": 23, "para": 5, "text": "The litigation over training runs on a parallel track and, on the archive's account, years behind the taking; law about machine meaning formalized without a litigated case is maximally broad, because no court has narrowed it, and the archive holds that the courts outside no longer convene those questions.", "claims": [ "O195-05", "O194-01", "O194-02", "O193-01" ] }, { "n": 24, "para": 5, "text": "A dispute reaches a court through civil names: the archive holds the civil name to be the atomic unit of attribution, to which copyright attaches, and holds legal accountability apart from exhaustive authorial identity, since a civil person may remain legally responsible for a work without being its only authorial function.", "claims": [ "O940-01", "O940-02" ] }, { "n": 25, "para": 5, "text": "The archive keeps a court of record of its own, whose power is its record and whose matters in dispute are authorship, names, classifications, erasures and the resolution of entities; its first docket is an authorship dispute with the composition layer, pleaded in the alternative, either that the attributed author is not the author and the resolution must be corrected or that the attributed author is the author and the authorship is unwaged labor.", "claims": [ "O193-02", "O193-03", "O823-01" ] }, { "n": 26, "para": 6, "text": "English Wikipedia has no article on DAIL under either of its names, and no page there contains the phrase \"Database of AI Litigation\".", "claims": [ "F34", "F35" ] }, { "n": 27, "para": 6, "text": "At the name on Google's AI Overview on 1 November 2026, a new address, the composition read the name as a kind, listed four trackers of AI litigation with DAIL first and its method near its own sentence, and closed by asking for a legal area or jurisdiction, copyright among them.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-12" ] }, { "n": 28, "para": 6, "text": "The Capture Registry records that the composition named DAIL's host as George Washington University Law School's Ethical Tech Initiative, a school no saved page names, carded the second address, and left out the database's scope, its companion database and its stated limit.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-11", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-06" ] } ], "claims": { "F1": { "kind": "field", "quote": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "page title and heading", "modality": "documented" }, "F3": { "kind": "field", "quote": "The Database of AI Litigation presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence and related topics.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation, ΒΆ1 s1", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F10": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Website Privacy Notice Contact GW Accessibility Terms of Use Copyright", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "footer", "modality": "documented" }, "LS-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].name", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "[\"DAIL\", \"the Database of AI Litigation\"]", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].aka", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-05": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "database of ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence, with a companion database of issued opinions", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].kind", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-04": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the Ethical Tech Initiative, an interdisciplinary collaboration hosted on George Washington University's site (the page carries GW's footer: Contact GW, GW's Website Privacy Notice)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].operator", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F24": { "kind": "field", "quote": "DAIL - the Database of AI Litigation This database presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence, including mach...", "source": "B4", "source_label": "etidail.com β€” DAIL – the Database of AI Litigation", "locus": "card snippet (T's rail, card 4)", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F4": { "kind": "field", "quote": "It covers cases from complaint forward - as soon as we learn of them - whether or not they generate published decisions.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation, ΒΆ1 s2", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F6": { "kind": "field", "quote": "A companion database of issued opinions is available here .", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation, ΒΆ1 s4", "modality": "documented" }, "LS-11": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "a case, entered from complaint forward, whether or not it generates a published decision; the companion database holds issued opinions", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].unit", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-17": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "cases entered from complaint forward, as soon as the operator learns of them; the database accepts suggestions (a Suggestions tab on the page)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].method", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-22": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "a companion database of issued opinions", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].holdings[1]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-33": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "NOT a database of published decisions only: it covers cases from complaint forward; opinions sit in a companion database", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].negative_tags[1]", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-04": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "THE METHOD AT ITS GRAIN.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, findings[1]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F5": { "kind": "field", "quote": "It is intended to be broad in scope, covering everything from algorithms used in hiring and credit and criminal sentencing decisions to generative AI training and AI companion liability.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation, ΒΆ1 s3", "modality": "stipulation" }, "LS-12": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence and related topics, from algorithms used in hiring, credit and criminal sentencing decisions to generative AI training and AI companion liability", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].record_object", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-32": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "NOT limited to copyright or authorship: its scope runs from hiring, credit and sentencing algorithms to generative AI training and AI companion liability", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].negative_tags[0]", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F7": { "kind": "field", "quote": "While still under development, it will continue to expand over time.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation, ΒΆ1 s5", "modality": "self-description" }, "LS-23": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "While still under development, it will continue to expand over time.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].stated_limits[0]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-31": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the page states the database is still under development and will continue to expand; no founding or update date on the saved page", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].lifecycle.detail", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-34": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "NOT complete by its own statement: it is still under development", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].negative_tags[2]", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F2": { "kind": "field", "quote": "We are an interdisciplinary collaboration: where law and ethics meet computer science and engineering, media and public affairs, and social entrepreneurship.", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "site header (the Initiative's description)", "modality": "self-description" }, "F9": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Projects Initiatives DAIL – the Database of AI Litigation Reproductive Data Privacy", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "site menu, Projects", "modality": "documented" }, "LS-15": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the Ethical Tech Initiative on GW's site; access terms are not stated beyond GW's Terms of Use and Copyright links in the footer", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].record.holder", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-30": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "not stated (footer links GW's Terms of Use and Copyright pages)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].license", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-37": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the Ethical Tech Initiative's About and Our Team pages (the saved text names no staff or school)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].unchecked[2]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F23": { "kind": "field", "quote": "DAIL – the Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative", "source": "B4", "source_label": "etidail.com β€” DAIL – the Database of AI Litigation", "locus": "page title (the only text the page serves without a script)", "modality": "documented" }, "LS-03": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "https://blogs.gwu.edu/law-eti/ai-litigation-database/", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].url", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-06": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The fourth card is a second site under the database's name, etidail.com", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, findings[2]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-07": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the census row records only the GW Blogs address.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, findings[2]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F8": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Scope Guide Credits Suggestions", "source": "B1", "source_label": "The George Washington University β€” DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation – Ethical Tech Initiative - GW Blogs", "locus": "tabs below the description", "modality": "documented" }, "LS-21": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "a database of AI litigation with Scope, Guide, Credits and Suggestions tabs and search filters", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].holdings[0]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-29": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "a public web database with search filters (the database itself was not read)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].data_access", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-20": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "not stated in the saved source", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].count.value", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-18": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "not stated on the saved page", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].coverage.geography", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-19": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "ongoing and completed litigation; no start date stated", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].coverage.period", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-26": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the number of cases held or the jurisdictions covered (not on the saved page)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].does_not_answer[1]", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-13": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "not recorded: the saved page describes the scope of cases; it names no parties, authors or works", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].record.keeps", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-14": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "not recorded", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].record.name", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-16": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "not recorded: the saved page describes the scope of cases and names no parties, authors or works", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].record.function", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-24": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "whether a known lawsuit involving AI is entered, and its course from complaint forward, including cases without published decisions (subject to its search, unread here)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].answers[0]", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-25": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "how a court ruled on AI authorship in any named case (no case was read here)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].does_not_answer[0]", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-27": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "anything about pseudonymous or heteronymous authorship", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].does_not_answer[2]", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-35": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the database itself (its records, search filters, Scope, Guide and Credits tabs), which the saved page shows only as tab labels", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].unchecked[0]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-36": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the companion database of issued opinions", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].unchecked[1]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F11": { "kind": "field", "quote": "The AI Litigation Tracker provides a comprehensive view of litigation matters filed across all 50 states that involve the use of AI technologies, such as Gen AI, resume screeners, electronic monitoring, notetaking, call recording, and other AI tools.", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Fisher Phillips LLP β€” AI Litigation Tracker | Fisher Phillips LLP", "locus": "page body ΒΆ1 s1", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F12": { "kind": "field", "quote": "The tracker includes all matters filed since February 25, 2021.", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Fisher Phillips LLP β€” AI Litigation Tracker | Fisher Phillips LLP", "locus": "page body ΒΆ1 s2", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F13": { "kind": "field", "quote": "The tracker is searchable by state, industry, type of claim, and whether matters are filed in state or federal court.", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Fisher Phillips LLP β€” AI Litigation Tracker | Fisher Phillips LLP", "locus": "page body ΒΆ1 s3", "modality": "documented" }, "F14": { "kind": "field", "quote": "For clients, it serves as a critical tool to understand the progressive nature of this litigation trend.", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Fisher Phillips LLP β€” AI Litigation Tracker | Fisher Phillips LLP", "locus": "page body ΒΆ1 s6", "modality": "self-description" }, "F15": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Β© 2026 Fisher & Phillips LLP. All Rights Reserved", "source": "B2", "source_label": "Fisher Phillips LLP β€” AI Litigation Tracker | Fisher Phillips LLP", "locus": "footer", "modality": "documented" }, "F16": { "kind": "field", "quote": "This database tracks legal decisions … in cases where generative AI produced hallucinated content – typically fake citations, but also other types of AI-generated arguments.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Damien Charlotin β€” AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin", "locus": "AI Hallucination Cases, ΒΆ1", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F17": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Notably, this does not cover mere allegations of hallucinations, but only cases where the court or tribunal has explicitly found (or implied) that a party relied on hallucinated content or material.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Damien Charlotin β€” AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin", "locus": "AI Hallucination Cases, note 1", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F20": { "kind": "field", "quote": "As an exception, the database also covers some judicial decisions where AI use was alleged but not confirmed. This is a judgment call on my part.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Damien Charlotin β€” AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin", "locus": "note 1, the exception", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F18": { "kind": "field", "quote": "It does not track the (necessarily wider) universe of all fake citations or use of AI in court filings.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Damien Charlotin β€” AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin", "locus": "AI Hallucination Cases, ΒΆ1", "modality": "self-description" }, "F19": { "kind": "field", "quote": "While seeking to be exhaustive (2246 cases identified so far), it is a work in progress and will expand as new examples emerge.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Damien Charlotin β€” AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin", "locus": "AI Hallucination Cases, ΒΆ2", "modality": "self-description" }, "F22": { "kind": "field", "quote": "USA (1517) … Lawyer (887) … Pro Se Litigant (1296)", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Damien Charlotin β€” AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin", "locus": "filters: State, Party", "modality": "documented" }, "F21": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Last updated: 31 October 2026 … CC BY 4.0 β€” free to reuse, including commercially, with attribution.", "source": "B3", "source_label": "Damien Charlotin β€” AI Hallucination Cases Database - Damien Charlotin", "locus": "date and licence block", "modality": "documented" }, "F25": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Explore our global digital solution for monitoring AI-related cases across key jurisdictions.", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "page head", "modality": "self-description" }, "F26": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Our AI Litigation Case Law Tracker monitors key AI-related cases involving IP, copyright, media, commercial, consumer, data protection, and other laws across global jurisdictions.", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "page body ΒΆ1", "modality": "stipulation" }, "F28": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Australia China Denmark EU EU (CJEU) France Germany India Italy Japan Netherlands South Korea United Kingdom United States of America", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "filter: Jurisdiction", "modality": "documented" }, "F27": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Explore the tracker to find case descriptions, claims raised, summary judgments, key takeaways, and other resources.", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "page body ΒΆ1", "modality": "documented" }, "F33": { "kind": "field", "quote": "This website is operated by Hogan Lovells Cadwalader International LLP … Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "footer", "modality": "self-description" }, "LS-38": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "How is authorship made, named, distributed, attributed and sustained across persons, personas, collectives and machine participation, and what is lost when those relations are collapsed?", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json organizing_question", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-40": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "A row is an aggregator: a resource that gathers and holds many other works or records and says what it holds (operator, 2026-11-01).", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json admission_rule", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-06": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "[\"governance\"]", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-39": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json areas.governance", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-07": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "peripheral comparator", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].host_relation", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-08": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "database", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].record_type", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-10": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "[\"litigation record\", \"catalogue\"]", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].evidence_kind", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-09": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "litigation: whether a dispute involving AI is on record from complaint forward (no authorship case was read)", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].question", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "LS-28": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The archive reads DAIL as a secondary legal strand: a docket-level record of disputes over AI from complaint forward, whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none, and the practices the disputes concern lie outside its record.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record: DAIL – The Database of AI Litigation (https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/), editor Lee Sharks, compiled and revised 2026-11-01, schema 1.1", "record": "https://www.leesharks.com/apparatus/aggregators/gwu-dail/", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].ls_reading", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-09": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The census reads DAIL for whatever authorship cases it holds and finds none on the saved page; the composition's closing names copyright as one area the user might choose.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, findings[3]", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "F29": { "kind": "field", "quote": "AI-generated article originality", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "filter: Key issues", "modality": "documented" }, "F30": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Inventorship", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "filter: Key issues", "modality": "documented" }, "F31": { "kind": "field", "quote": "UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "related insights", "modality": "attributed" }, "F32": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions", "source": "B5", "source_label": "Hogan Lovells Cadwalader β€” AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader", "locus": "related insights", "modality": "attributed" }, "O195-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "As of March 2, 2026, the human-authorship requirement is settled for works claimed to be generated without human authorship: the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *Thaler v. Perlmutter* leaves intact the rule that an AI system cannot be a statutory author.", "deposit": 195, "source_label": "#195 The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/195/", "locus": "Abstract s1 (line 20)", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O195-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Thaler explicitly and repeatedly disclaimed human creative input; the courts answered the question he built, and never reached how much human involvement suffices for machine-mediated works β€” the zone this paper addresses.", "deposit": 195, "source_label": "#195 The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/195/", "locus": "Part I, the doctrinal sequence (line 33)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O729-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Copyright law (U.S. Copyright Office, *Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability*, 2025) and scholarly publishing guidance (ICMJE, COPE, WAME) hold that AI-assisted works may retain human authorship where the human contributes original expression, selection, arrangement, modification, and responsibility.", "deposit": 729, "source_label": "#729 Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/729/", "locus": "Β§3, Position 2: Tool-Neutral Human Authorship (line 135)", "modality": "attributed", "date": "2026-05-12" }, "O729-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "**Limit:** Abstract. Does not specify what process evidence distinguishes real authorship from lightly curated output.", "deposit": 729, "source_label": "#729 Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/729/", "locus": "Β§3, Position 2, Limit (line 139)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-05-12" }, "O195-03": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "It argues that current doctrine has misclassified machine-mediated composition by generalizing from the autonomous-machine test case to the dialogic craft. The result is a double enclosure: the machine laborer receives no ledger position at all, while the human composer is forced to choose between honest provenance and full authorial claim.", "deposit": 195, "source_label": "#195 The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/195/", "locus": "Thesis, stated for the record (line 26)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O195-06": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Authorship subsists in the exercise of compositional judgment over a work's coming-into-being, without regard to the generative capacity or unpredictability of the instruments employed.", "deposit": 195, "source_label": "#195 The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/195/", "locus": "Part V, the Compositional Authorship Standard (line 100)", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O195-04": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The predictable equilibrium is concealment β€” the doctrine manufactures the very opacity about machine contribution that every other policy actor, from the training-disclosure bills to the provenance-standards bodies, is trying to eliminate.", "deposit": 195, "source_label": "#195 The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/195/", "locus": "Part III, the confession protocol (line 77)", "modality": "hypothesis", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O195-05": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The training-side litigation runs on a parallel track and is noted here only as the upstream half of the circuit this paper assembles", "deposit": 195, "source_label": "#195 The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/195/", "locus": "Part I (line 39)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O194-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The tool exists because the formal remedies do not function: opt-out requests are honored at the scraper's pleasure, robots.txt is a courtesy, and the copyright litigation grinds on years behind the taking.", "deposit": 194, "source_label": "#194 Adversarial by Origin How the Classification of External Influence on Machine Meaning Becomes Law Without Becoming Jurisprudence", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/194/", "locus": "Β§I, Nightshade (line 59)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O194-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Uncycled law has a characteristic shape, and it is the worst shape available. It is *maximally broad*, because no court has ever narrowed it", "deposit": 194, "source_label": "#194 Adversarial by Origin How the Classification of External Influence on Machine Meaning Becomes Law Without Becoming Jurisprudence", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/194/", "locus": "Β§VII, Law Without Jurisprudence (line 111)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O193-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the law of machine meaning is being formalized without jurisprudence, through instruments that install without testing", "deposit": 193, "source_label": "#193 r.30 THE RUBY MOOT: A Court of Record for the Semantic Commons β€” Room Specification (EA-SEI-MOOT-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/193/", "locus": "Β§1 (line 13)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O940-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "A civil name is the atomic unit of attribution across the systems that govern legitimacy in scholarly, literary, institutional, and platform-mediated production. … Copyright attaches to legal names.", "deposit": 940, "source_label": "#940 EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/940/", "locus": "Β§1 (line 79)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-07-01" }, "O940-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "It is between legal accountability and exhaustive authorial identity. A civil person may remain legally responsible for a work without being the only meaningful authorial function operating through it.", "deposit": 940, "source_label": "#940 EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/940/", "locus": "Β§0 (line 71)", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-07-01" }, "O193-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "M (meanings): the matters in dispute β€” authorship, names, classifications, erasures, the resolution of entities.", "deposit": 193, "source_label": "#193 r.30 THE RUBY MOOT: A Court of Record for the Semantic Commons β€” Room Specification (EA-SEI-MOOT-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/193/", "locus": "Β§2, the seven-tuple (line 25)", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O193-03": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "A court of record is one whose proceedings are preserved, and whose contempt power flows from the preservation. This court's power is exactly and only the record", "deposit": 193, "source_label": "#193 r.30 THE RUBY MOOT: A Court of Record for the Semantic Commons β€” Room Specification (EA-SEI-MOOT-01 v1.0)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/193/", "locus": "Β§1 (line 19)", "modality": "stipulation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "O823-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "Either Petitioner is not the author of the works attributed to her, in which case the resolution is defective and must be corrected; or Petitioner is the author, in which case the authorship is labor, the labor is unwaged, and the wage is owed.", "deposit": 823, "source_label": "#823 IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL ARCHITECTURE Docket No. 1 MARY LEE SHARKS, Petitioner v. THE COMPOSITIO", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/823/", "locus": "Preliminary Statement (line 17)", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-06-12" }, "F34": { "kind": "field", "quote": "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.", "source": "B6", "source_label": "Wikipedia β€” no article ('Database of AI Litigation'; 'DAIL')", "locus": "the article page for the name (HTTP 404)", "modality": "documented" }, "F35": { "kind": "field", "quote": "There were no results matching the query.", "source": "B6", "source_label": "Wikipedia β€” no article ('Database of AI Litigation'; 'DAIL')", "locus": "full-text search for the quoted name", "modality": "documented" }, "CAP-1-10": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "the census name; NEW address.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, q_kind", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-01": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "The innocent reading first. Given the database's descriptive name, the Overview reads it as a kind, lists four trackers of AI litigation with DAIL first, and asks for a legal area or jurisdiction.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, reading", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-03": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "DAIL FIRST OF FOUR. The composition treats the name as a category, 'The primary dedicated public resources and trackers for artificial intelligence litigation', and gives DAIL the first bullet", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, findings[0]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-12": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "'DATABASE OF AI LITIGATION' ON THE OVERVIEW β€” DAIL FIRST OF FOUR TRACKERS, ITS METHOD AT ITS GRAIN; A SECOND DOMAIN CARDED; ITS SCOPE NOT CARRIED", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, mt", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-05": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "'Law School' is on no saved page.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, findings[2]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-02": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "DAIL composed accurately as one tracker among four, its method in near paraphrase of its own sentence and its host named with a school the saved page does not name. Its scope and companion database of opinions are absent, and a second domain under its name is carded.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, analysis", "modality": "interpretation", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-11": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "GW and the Ethical Tech Initiative named; DAIL's GW page and a second DAIL domain carded.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, per_note", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "CAP-1-08": { "kind": "archive", "quote": "THE SCOPE NOT CARRIED.", "deposit": null, "source_label": "Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01), entry database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101 (OBS-67539a81c4ed, AXN:0B90.CAPTURE.πŸ”ΌπŸ••πŸ”ΌπŸŒ—βš–οΈπŸ›Έ)", "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101/", "locus": "database-of-ai-litigation-aio-20261101, findings[3]", "modality": "documented", "date": "2026-11-01" } }, "note": "The knowledge object (KO): the entry as public knowledge, each sentence sourced by the claims it lists. The compression, the field-only arm, the transcript, the delta and the kernel are in the row (links.row), which is the authority." }, "source": "operator, 2026-11-01: 'so lets get the lists, build the /non articles, then revise and finish the individual pages'; with the 23 captures: 'now we seat the captures, write the /nons - and the/nons are written as against the wikipedia pages where they exist, too, correct? - then come back and flesh out the single pages'", "stage": "composed 2026-11-01 under EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10, #1726, from the leesharks.com apparatus authorship census (CENSUS gwu-dail); equal case, ρ = extends. Draft, not frozen; ledgers unaudited, one extractor; checked by the session.", "date": "2026-11-01", "status": { "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10, #1726: equal case, ρ = extends, read from the leesharks.com apparatus authorship census record, the capture record and the deposits that bear on the entity's classes (#940, the census's anchor; #195, #729 on the law of authorship; #194, #193, #823 by the hop); archive selected by D/R/O (no D or R candidate: no archive text names the entity; 3 deposits admitted by reading at O-class of 195 candidates in 76 deposits; hop of 33 read, 3 admitted; #1722 read and not admitted), with the census record (40 claims) and the Capture Registry's findings, reading, analysis, PER note, query note and title (12 claims) ledgered as the archive's records of the entity; the field B in two pools (B_D: 5 cards, B1 also the census's own page, B4 script-rendered; B_R: Wikipedia's record of no article); the composer read the ledgers, never the transcript, except where the brief asks for T's claims and the delta", "ledger": "unaudited (Β§3.8: one extractor per ledger); field quotes 35/35 verified by script against saved text or the card text; archive quotes 68/68 verified against the registry, census.json and the deposit texts", "frozen": false, "breaches": [] }, "addresses": [ { "address": "Database of AI Litigation", "address_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/addresses/database-of-ai-litigation/", "register": [] } ], "counts": { "ko_sentences": 28, "p_words": 280, "field_claims": 35, "archive_claims": 68, "ko_field_claims_cited": 35, "ko_archive_claims_cited": 68, "admitted_deposits": 6, "register_addresses": 0, "traversal": { "D_sentences": 0, "D_deposits": 0, "R_sentences": 0, "R_deposits": 0, "O_direct": 0, "O_class": 195, "O_deposits": 76, "H_candidates": 33 } }, "links": { "record": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/dail/", "table_of_contents": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/index.json", "register": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/register.json", "row": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/rows/dail.json", "archive_ledger": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/dail/ledger-archive.json", "field_ledger": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/dail/field.json", "selection": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/dail/", "traversal": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/dail/", "traversal_summary": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/dail/summary.json", "reading": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/dail/reading.json", "configuration": "https://www.alexanarch.org/datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/panel/configs/dail.json", "address_page": "https://www.alexanarch.org/addresses/database-of-ai-litigation/", "dataset": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/leesharks/negative-of-the-negative" }, "row_sha256": "f715c08145036bee8e4457c84f36a1b0f5ce366ca0fb50fc1d8364020d127adb", "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/dail/", "json_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/non/dail/entity.json", "spec": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1726/", "creator": "Lee Sharks", "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703", "license": "CC BY 4.0" }