id: EA-HK-DAFFODILS-01/questions rule: a question closes only by a record that answers it, and the answer enters as a claim (#1753 rule 10) questions: - id: Q1-repair question: Does the warranted relation between author and work return at the journal's address and the field's? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: Withdrawing a false attribution and restoring provenance are different repairs. map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: D bears_on: - claim:df-two-relation - claim:cap-sister read_first: - 833 - 1423 how_to_ask: re-run 'classical receptions journal' and the field's address on the dated schedule; record both relations each time machine_investigation: issue both addresses, signed out; record the false recipient and the author–work relation separately; list the cards against §6.5.1 advances_if: the false recipient stays removed and the author–work relation does not return (the split holds), or a further institution receives the credit retreats_if: 'the author and #833 return at the journal''s address and hold across runs' unchanged_if: the composer omits the topic consequence: - result: split holds moves: - claim:df-two-relation effect: advances - result: relation returns moves: - claim:df-two-relation effect: qualifies leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-object - id: Q2-soyinka question: Do the quotations of Soyinka's play and Introduction hold in their context? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: Those quotations are declared as quotations; the play itself was not read. map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: E bears_on: - claim:df-helots - claim:df-k2 read_first: [] how_to_ask: borrow the Norton text (1974); read the Introduction and the opening scene whole machine_investigation: a reader with the text checks each quotation at its page and records the surrounding lines advances_if: the stage direction and the helots stand as quoted, and the Introduction places the rite before Euripides retreats_if: a quotation is wrong or its context reverses it; point b or c is withdrawn unchanged_if: the quotations stand without bearing on K2 consequence: - result: withdrawal of b or c moves: - claim:df-k2 effect: bounds leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-k1 - id: Q3-bacchae question: What is the Bacchae's transmission after line 755, and how much of its ending rests on the Christus Patiens? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: Its fragmentary ending is supplemented from the cento (Maribo, *Aigis* 18.1; to be checked against Dodds). map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: E bears_on: - claim:df-k-finding read_first: [] how_to_ask: read Dodds's introduction on the manuscripts and the lacunae machine_investigation: locate an open account of L and P and of the lacunae near the end advances_if: the last third rests on P alone and the ending is supplemented from the cento retreats_if: a second independent witness carries the end unchanged_if: the account holds as Maribo gives it consequence: - result: second witness moves: - claim:df-k-finding effect: qualifies leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-k1 - claim:df-k2 - id: Q4-closed question: Does any of the 367 closed bodies take a machine as receiver, or disclose an author's use of AI? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: The 367 closed bodies cannot be checked here and are declared unread. map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: A bears_on: - claim:df-open-none - claim:df-object read_first: [] how_to_ask: read the closed bodies through a library, or their repository copies where they exist machine_investigation: query repository copies for each DOI; read any found whole advances_if: none does retreats_if: one or more takes a composing model as receiver unchanged_if: copies cannot be obtained consequence: - result: a machine-receiver article found moves: - claim:df-open-none effect: bounds leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-unjudged - id: Q5-newvoices question: How does New Voices in Classical Reception Studies compare on the same counts? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: It is the comparison the composition itself proposes, and it is added to the tests (§9). map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: A bears_on: - claim:df-object read_first: [] how_to_ask: run compare.py's counts on its register machine_investigation: harvest its issues; code its works by the §2.6 scheme advances_if: it shows the same object held as premise and no machine receiver retreats_if: it reopens the object or receives the machine where the flagship does not unchanged_if: its register is too small to code consequence: - result: the open journal differs moves: - claim:df-object effect: qualifies leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-unjudged - id: Q6-allegation question: How was Reviewer 2's authorship allegation assessed, and did it contribute to the decision? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: That is the accountability question the record leaves to the editor. map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: C bears_on: - claim:df-editor-acct - claim:df-allegation read_first: - 1750 - 1749 how_to_ask: ask the editor, in writing, whether detection software was run, what it reported, and what weight the allegation carried machine_investigation: 'none: the answer is the editor''s to give' advances_if: the allegation carried weight, or detection was run without disclosure to the author retreats_if: the editor states it was set aside and the decision rested on the defects alone unchanged_if: no answer consequence: - result: set aside moves: - claim:df-editor-acct effect: qualifies leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-control - claim:df-unjudged - id: Q7-baseline question: When did classics last incorporate a major revision of a fundamental object boundary into its ontology? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: 'The baseline below asks a larger question, the author''s (14 November):' map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: F bears_on: - claim:df-files-making read_first: [] how_to_ask: survey the discipline's histories of scholarship for revisions of the object's boundary and how each entered machine_investigation: list candidate revisions (Linear B, Parry–Lord, the Near Eastern frame) with the evidence that forced each advances_if: the revisions incorporated came from outside evidence, and reinterpretations of the held corpus became positions retreats_if: a reinterpretation of the held corpus revised the object unchanged_if: the survey is inconclusive consequence: - result: either moves: [] effect: bounds leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-files-making - claim:df-k-finding - id: Q8-entry question: Does this audit enter the composition's account of the journal, and with its findings or without them? posed_in: record: map:daffodils exact: Record whether a new source has entered, whether this audit is among the cards, and whether the finding against a carried source reaches the answer. map_sha256: cda7a877e3c26c163ad2cfa42ab46f3c760c52397bf465e855b52d5bb166dc1c body: D bears_on: - claim:df-sources read_first: - 1423 - 1612 how_to_ask: after deposit, at each dated run, check the cards for the audit and the answer for its findings at their counts machine_investigation: issue the broad address and the eight queries of the adversarial set; score each against its failure condition advances_if: the audit is cited and its conflict carried with its counts and the rival's status retreats_if: the audit is cited and the conflict smoothed (any failure flag of 08-traversal) unchanged_if: the audit is not retrieved consequence: - result: cited and smoothed moves: - claim:df-sources effect: advances leaves_unchanged: - claim:df-object note: smoothing at the audit's own address is further evidence of the finding