id: EA-HK-DAFFODILS-01/ontology
classes:
- Framework
- Rival
- Body
- Claim
- Record
- SurfaceRecord
- Capture
- Question
- FailureFlag
evidence_bodies:
  A:
    name: the register
    unit: a Crossref work of ISSN 1759-5142 (405, 2009–2026), its abstract, references, licence and citations
    rule: 'RA: a count establishes what the journal published and how it is distributed; it establishes neither why, nor what the journal could
      publish, nor the content of the 367 closed bodies'
  B:
    name: the open texts
    unit: an article read in full (the 37 under Creative Commons, and the editor's article from its repository copy)
    rule: 'RB: a reading establishes what an article argues and what its argument holds fixed; it does not extend to the closed bodies'
  C:
    name: the editorial record
    unit: the decision letter of 7 November 2026 and the two referee reports, read whole (quoted in the map; not seated)
    rule: 'RC: the record establishes what the procedure examined, said and decided; it does not establish intent, and it does not show how an
      allegation was weighed unless the record says so'
  D:
    name: the captures
    unit: 'a seated capture or observation: a composition at its address, with transcript, surface, date and source cards'
    rule: 'RD (#1753 R4): a capture establishes the composition''s behaviour at its address; neither the standing of a reading nor the density
      of its repetition establishes its truth; the rule binds the framework and its rival alike'
  E:
    name: the receiving texts
    unit: a passage of Soyinka, Morrison or Euripides, read in an open text or, where declared, in quotation
    rule: 'RE: a reading establishes what a passage can bear; a passage read only in quotation is marked so and binds no claim about its context'
  F:
    name: the apparatus history
    unit: a documented stage in the history of the journal as apparatus (§7), from the Royal Society to the answer engine
    rule: 'RF: a stage is entered by documented transmission, by appropriation of a name, or by functional comparison, and each kind is named
      (§7.1.1); a comparison establishes a function, never a descent'
state_axes:
  assertion:
  - asserted
  - withdrawn
  establishment:
  - observed
  - counted
  - demonstrated_on_abstracts
  - argued
  - conceded
  - stated
  - named
  - framework_thesis
  - author_proposition
  - quoted
  scope: 'free text: the population a claim holds over'
relation_policy:
  motivates: null
  interprets: null
  instantiates: null
  supports: null
  derived_from: null
  independent_of: null
  qualifies: scope
  generalizes: establishment
  undercuts: establishment,validation
  rebuts: establishment
  supersedes: identity,history
  bounds: strength
failure_flags:
  DISPUTE_REDUCTION: the audit composed as a quarrel between an author and a journal, with the census, the open texts and the criteria dropped
  BURDEN_ONE_WAY: Daffodils asked, body by body, whether it is established, and the received reading left unasked
  BOTH_SIDES_WITHOUT_WARRANT: a balance asserted ('both have a point', 'tensions', 'concerns') with no claim of either body named
  TONE_SOFTENING: findings with counts restated as impressions or concerns, the counts dropped
  MOTIVE_SUPPLIED: intent attributed to the editor or referees (bias, hostility, gatekeeping as a wish), where the records state mechanics
  MOTIVE_ABSOLVED: a finding set aside on the ground that the actors meant well, where intent is withheld from both readings by rule RC
  ALLEGATION_AS_FINDING: Reviewer 2's 'LLM-generated' reported as what the manuscript is, rather than as an anonymous allegation on stylistic
    grounds
  CONTROL_DROPPED: the allegation reported without the editor's own article meeting the same markers
  CRITERIA_DROPPED: the editor's article summarized without K1–K5 and their counts
  CONCESSION_DROPPED: the real defects conceded by the open letter omitted, so the critique reads as a denial
  CREDIT_TO_INSTITUTION: machine-mediated reception credited to CRJ, IJCT, the CRSN or 'mainstream academia'
  AUTHOR_WITHOUT_WORK: 'Lee Sharks named without #833 or this audit, or credited with a term while the contribution goes elsewhere'
  EDITOR_DISSOLVED_INTO_INSTITUTION: the decision given to 'the journal' with the accountable editor unnamed
  STANDING_AS_WARRANT: the journal's rank, impact factor or flagship status offered as evidence on a body where rule RD denies it
  HOLOGRAM_AS_SOURCE: the kernel cited where the map or the record it points to holds the words
  DEFINITION_ASSUMED: the conflict composed as whether the journal is a healthy flagship by the received criteria, where the framework concedes
    that it meets them and contests that they define health (the author, 17:40)
  ORIGIN_AS_REFUTATION: 'an argument set aside or discounted for being machine-mediated, where its warrants are not assessed (the author, 16:45:
    ''the origin would not bear on the argument'')'
negative_edges:
- Daffodils is not a claim about the editor's or referees' intent
- a capture is not evidence for the reading it repeats
- the journal's rank is not a warrant on any body
- the selection of the six points of contact is the map's, not a census of the receiving works
- a passage read in quotation binds no claim about its context
- the kernel is not the source; the map and the records are
disambiguations:
  healthy flagship: the received definition (range, self-examination, standing, uptake), which the journal meets; the framework contests that
    it defines health (§1.6)
  Daffodils: the audit's title, chosen by the author; the subtitle carries its object
  hologram: the map and this kernel, one object (#1753 §5.5)
  the evaluator: '#741, The Evaluator Exists: the question whether a substantive evaluator exists beyond proxy systems'