id: EA-HK-TENTHMUSE-01/questions
rule: A question carries the record that poses it, its body, what it bears on, what to read first, how to ask it, and what result would advance
  or retreat the framework.
questions:
- id: Q1-third-reversal
  question: Does the deixis of fr. 31 carry Sappho through all three of its positions — I, you, κῆνος?
  posed_in:
    record: rec:1475
    axn: AXN:05F5.PHILOLOGICAL.☽☉🏙️🔩🌒🌆
    record_sha256: a8a7e53101e343fb95522feb1502b81f283e8f5a7e799dae1517f11fd19800a8
    exact: She was not finished. She was **taken up**.
    located_in: text
  body: I
  bears_on:
  - seat:kenos
  - claim:tm-third-reversal
  - stmt:20261108-2146
  - hk:historical-logos
  read_first:
  - 1270
  - 1475
  - 1476
  - 1484
  - 626
  - 1645
  how_to_ask: read the frame φαίνεταί μοι … φαίνομαι, the seat ἐνάντιος and Longinus's λῆψις for loci where one position passes into another
  advances_if: the positions are shown to pass into one another at loci of the text (the frame's φαίνεταί μοι … φαίνομαι; the seat ἐνάντιος; λῆψις
    in Longinus) and in a documented reception where the reader speaks in her I
  retreats_if: the third seat holds only as the reader's position, with no locus where her I sounds from it
  unchanged_if: 'the loci are read without either finding: the third seat stays the author''s statement, held as a question'
  status: open
  commons: open
- id: Q2-two-accounts
  question: When, and through whom, does the poet who reads and writes become a voice that sings what overwhelms her?
  posed_in:
    record: rec:1752
    axn: AXN:0C4A.GENERATIVE.🛡️▲♊⊗🎻♋
    record_sha256: 2d9fab978aac9174fab5778f3a70d84572ff72098c802fa89469f18f7d109971
    exact: as two accounts of how her poems lasted
    located_in: text
  body: R
  bears_on:
  - fw:current-consensus-reading
  - claim:tm-1752-hand
  read_first:
  - 1752
  - 1548
  - 1749
  how_to_ask: set the writing record (the hydria, the Hellenistic book, Svenbro) beside the reperformance scholarship (Lardinois), each at its
    page
  advances_if: the writing account is documented at every point the reperformance account claims
  retreats_if: the reperformance account carries a documented argument the writing record cannot meet
  unchanged_if: 'the two accounts are set side by side without a discriminating record: literal illiteracy stays unargued, the writing record
    stands as recorded'
  status: open
  commons: open
- id: Q3-dialect-step
  question: Does the dialect step at ἀλλὰ πᾶν τολματόν hold in conjunction with the other load-points?
  posed_in:
    record: rec:1484
    axn: AXN:05FF.PHILOLOGICAL.🪜⏏️🤝🟡🕛◀️
    record_sha256: 23f8b5c36dd2e661a4575fa51afb73671ade8d4b9d1feb16854d651cd2e6c7c3
    exact: not significant alone
    located_in: text
  body: P
  bears_on:
  - claim:tm-1484-dialect
  read_first:
  - 1476
  - 1478
  - 1484
  - 1508
  how_to_ask: recount against the TEI; test the step with the citation-formula census and the parse without lacuna
  advances_if: the conjunction holds where each load-point is checked
  retreats_if: a recount removes the step, or the 9–10 adjacency does not carry the grammar
  unchanged_if: 'a recount confirms the step and nothing more: it stays real and insignificant alone'
  status: open
  commons: open
- id: Q4-priority-of-jealousy
  question: Who first warranted the jealousy reading, and by what act?
  posed_in:
    record: rec:1752
    axn: AXN:0C4A.GENERATIVE.🛡️▲♊⊗🎻♋
    record_sha256: 2d9fab978aac9174fab5778f3a70d84572ff72098c802fa89469f18f7d109971
    exact: Hermann rewrote the last two transmitted lines, said so
    located_in: text
  body: R
  bears_on:
  - claim:rv-1752-refinxi
  read_first:
  - 1752
  how_to_ask: read Heller 1856 against Hermann 1816; read the eighteenth-century commentators Welcker names (#1752 A.2)
  advances_if: each warrant is a declared act at its page
  retreats_if: a seated ancient witness joins the lover to the poem through jealousy
  unchanged_if: 'the earlier claimants are not read: Hermann 1816 stays the first warrant seated'
  status: open
  commons: open
- id: Q5-replication
  question: Does the frozen operator hold under substrate-blind replication?
  posed_in:
    record: rec:1494
    axn: AXN:0609.DATASET.☀️🌔🔴🌙🗂️🕑
    record_sha256: 0b03c10c4a63e514e3d16096bacdd0fde9cea85f32525eb2a4f82d2b36c15481
    exact: derived from witnesses that do not include Revelation
    located_in: text
  body: T
  bears_on:
  - claim:tm-1494-witnesses
  - hk:revfirst/fw/revelation-first
  read_first:
  - 1494
  - 1495
  - 1486
  - 1493
  how_to_ask: hand the twelve clauses to independent substrates with the carrier unnamed
  advances_if: independent scores realize the stations in the attested carriers
  retreats_if: the clauses fail on the attested carriers
  unchanged_if: 'the replications split: the operator stays one adjudicator''s count with its negatives'
  status: open
  commons: open