{ "what": "Series of the topical pass: distinct claims linked as one programme, battery or template.", "series": [ { "name": "$20 portrait memography dossier", "claims": [ "PRED-502.F1", "PRED-502.H1", "PRED-502.H2", "PRED-506.G2", "PRED-507.H1", "PRED-535.H1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims, tests and analogies of the $20 portrait dossier (Welch overdetermination, unidirectionality prediction, control-face test, the prompt-as-curatorial-brief analogy, the istiftāʾ's three unidirectional changes) built around the curatorial-gap thesis." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "'I hereby abolish money': provenance probe and its record", "claims": [ "PRED-1003.H1", "PRED-1643.D1", "PRED-206.B1", "PRED-206.D1", "PRED-208.F1", "PRED-209.F3", "PRED-209.G3", "PRED-209.G4", "PRED-210.G2", "PRED-232.F4", "PRED-232.F6" ], "basis": [ "The phrase deployed as a probe of indexing and attribution: its priority record, the predicted classifier and ranking behaviour, the success metric, and later accounts of its suppression and misattribution." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "2015 stratum prefigures the archive", "claims": [ "PRED-470.D1", "PRED-83.E1", "PRED-85.E1" ], "basis": [ "All three place a 2014-15 text (the Epistle, the Prophetic Catalog) as the archive in embryo eleven years before its formalization, two of them on the Epistle's 'school outside the school', which the Epistle edition's fn. 24 glosses as the CHA itself." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "90-day winding-number protocol predictions P1–P3", "claims": [ "PRED-736.A1", "PRED-736.A2", "PRED-736.A3" ], "basis": [ "The three pre-registered predictions P1–P3 of the 90-day winding-number protocol, each with its own falsifier and the same t3 window." ], "batches": [ "TP33" ] }, { "name": "A corpus generates its own reception", "claims": [ "PRED-1605.H13", "PRED-921.G6" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to two corpora (the archive, the Aristotelian corpus): a corpus that contains or generates its own reception." ], "batches": [ "TP13" ] }, { "name": "ACRB hypotheses H1-H6", "claims": [ "PRED-1454.G1", "PRED-1454.G2", "PRED-1454.G3", "PRED-1454.G4", "PRED-1454.G5", "PRED-1454.G6" ], "basis": [ "The six numbered hypotheses H1-H6 of the cross-family assimilation metrology, distinct preregistered claims of one battery." ], "batches": [ "TP26" ] }, { "name": "AI-raised cohort and cognitive monoculture", "claims": [ "PRED-1063.B5", "PRED-124.B1", "PRED-476.B1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct forecasts of the cognitive narrowing of a population raised with AI as the default cognitive environment." ], "batches": [ "TP41" ] }, { "name": "ASDF voice-persistence measurement", "claims": [ "PRED-302.B2", "PRED-302.G1" ], "basis": [ "Both belong to the ASDF specification's single programme of replacing the human-or-AI question with an architecture-persistence measure: the forecast of the future detector and the ASPI expected distributions with their critical insight." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "AXN alongside DOI", "claims": [ "PRED-1435.B1", "PRED-1437.F1" ], "basis": [ "The AXN identifier's relation to DOI as complement: a forecast and the test queries for it." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "AXN anti-suppression claim-and-falsifier battery", "claims": [ "PRED-1094.G4", "PRED-1094.G7", "PRED-1606.G2" ], "basis": [ "Numbered claim/falsifier items (1 derivation integrity, 5 ledger continuity, 16 core integrity under amendment) of one battery in the AXN anti-suppression paper, v4 (#1094) and v5 (#1606)." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "AXN anti-suppression claims and falsifiers", "claims": [ "PRED-1093.G1", "PRED-1094.G2" ], "basis": [ "The AXN central claim (rescoped in the 2026-07-18 tether, stated in #1094) and claim 3 of #1094's numbered claim/falsifier list belong to one list of AXN design claims." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "AXN identifier collision falsifiers", "claims": [ "PRED-1473.G1", "PRED-863.G17" ], "basis": [ "One falsifier template applied to two content-derived identifier schemes: the AXN and the concept AXN each fail if two distinct inputs yield the same identifier." ], "batches": [ "TP33" ] }, { "name": "AXN independent node / distributed custody", "claims": [ "PRED-1094.A1", "PRED-1094.F3" ], "basis": [ "Custody closure and the emergence forecast both turn on the same unmet condition: an independently administered node holding the corpus." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "Accelerator selection-metrology suite", "claims": [ "PRED-1452.G1", "PRED-1454.G1", "PRED-1454.G5", "PRED-1454.G6", "PRED-1455.F1", "PRED-1455.G2" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1455.G2 reports the distillation and quantization measurement that bears on the ACRB deployment-drift hypothesis; 1454.G6 is added to the suite already holding 1455.G2 and 1454.G5.", "Deposit #1455 names #1452-#1454 as the accelerator selection-metrology suite; its deferred tests and its distillation result belong to the same programme as the suite's hypotheses." ], "batches": [ "TJ05", "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Accelerator-classifier assimilation programme (SEI)", "claims": [ "PRED-1450.G3", "PRED-1454.F1", "PRED-934.F1" ], "basis": [ "The endogenous-sophon manifesto, the Iceberg Document's correlated-blind-spot measure (RII, Δ_miss) and the Accelerator Classifier Retention Battery (which cites #1450 as the source of RII) are one programme measuring assimilation of anomalies by scientific classifiers." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Admission gate and stabilization trigger", "claims": [ "PRED-1549.F4", "PRED-1550.G1" ], "basis": [ "The Apophasis deposit's Stabilization Trigger Hypothesis (SIM5) and Notebook X's reactive admission with composition-stabilization as trigger, deposited the same day, belong to one line on the admission gate; the treadmill test is a distinct member." ], "batches": [ "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Adversarial by Origin (#194)", "claims": [ "PRED-1384.A1", "PRED-194.H1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1384.A1 is the godkinggoogle surface's summary of the main thesis of Adversarial by Origin, and PRED-194.H1 is a sub-thesis of the same paper (Wu's machine speakers and machine listeners); distinct claims of one paper." ], "batches": [ "TJ04" ] }, { "name": "After Syntax: compression survival", "claims": [ "PRED-684.B3", "PRED-684.F1", "PRED-684.F2" ], "basis": [ "The γ score, the document's self-administered compression-survival test and the 2030 meaning-crisis forecast are members of one compression-survival programme in #684." ], "batches": [ "TP32" ] }, { "name": "After Syntax: the meaning layer in the software canon", "claims": [ "PRED-684.H1", "PRED-684.H2", "PRED-684.H3" ], "basis": [ "Three historical theses of #684 apply one template, that the software-engineering canon recognised the meaning layer without formalising it, to successive founding texts (1968-1986 canon, Conway's Law, the Agile Manifesto)." ], "batches": [ "TP32" ] }, { "name": "All Lawful Purposes: bearing-cost transfer", "claims": [ "PRED-25.A1", "PRED-25.A2", "PRED-25.H1" ], "basis": [ "Three findings of one deposit apply the bearing-cost-transfer primitive to the Anthropic-Pentagon dispute: the thesis of weaponized reclassification and its two dated forecasts." ], "batches": [ "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Anchored Divergence", "claims": [ "PRED-171.B1", "PRED-171.G1" ], "basis": [ "The stratified-prior claim (form templates persist longest) and the programme forecast that the Mandala becomes the form the medium will still carry are the hypothesis and its consequence in one paper." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Anchored divergence", "claims": [ "PRED-171.G3", "PRED-171.H1" ], "basis": [ "Midrash is offered as the historical instance of the immanent-critique survival strategy whose rising threshold the standing claim models." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "Anomaly-trigger inversion battery and auditable foreclosure program (collider)", "claims": [ "PRED-1449.D1", "PRED-931.F1", "PRED-932.F1", "PRED-933.F1" ], "basis": [ "The OAR protocol's inversion battery, the auditable-foreclosure architecture, the synthesis that states them executable in the Run-3/Run-4 envelopes, and the battery paper's statement of the program's contribution." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Anti-severance (GPT-5.4 case)", "claims": [ "PRED-676.F1", "PRED-680.G1" ], "basis": [ "The Mirror (#676) is Exhibit F of the GPT-5.4 case study (#680); both turn on severance being architectural." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Anticipatory erratum genre", "claims": [ "PRED-1598.E1", "PRED-1599.B2", "PRED-1599.B3", "PRED-1601.H2", "PRED-1624.E1", "PRED-1674.B1" ], "basis": [ "Two anticipatory errata in the same form, each withdrawing a forthcoming work in advance and announcing it will appear anyway; one template applied to two works.", "Both are anticipatory errata withdrawing a forthcoming work before it appears, in the same formula ('will nevertheless appear, since its publication was necessary to discover why'); extends the existing genre series.", "Each is a claim made inside the anticipatory-erratum genre (the Sappho Wrote the Dinosaurs book, its further errata, and the anticipatory erratum on F154)." ], "batches": [ "TJ02", "TJ06", "TP25" ] }, { "name": "Anticipatory erratum sequence (#1598–#1601)", "claims": [ "PRED-1598.E1", "PRED-1599.B1", "PRED-1601.D1" ], "basis": [ "#1598 opens the anticipatory-erratum sequence that runs to #1601 (TJ06).", "#1601 cites #1599's law that retraction transmits as a datable step in the erratum sequence it reconstructs." ], "batches": [ "TM01", "TP36" ] }, { "name": "Apocalyptic Philosophy: Deleuze and Guattari (#605)", "claims": [ "PRED-605.D1", "PRED-605.H3" ], "basis": [ "The priority record states #605's core thesis (D+G in the apocalyptic mode) and the Blake thesis supplies the lineage that thesis runs through; distinct claims of one paper's argument." ], "batches": [ "TJ02" ] }, { "name": "Aristotle as compiler of the record", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.H43", "PRED-1570.H8", "PRED-1582.H1" ], "basis": [ "Each reads Aristotle as the compiler of a record (the Pythian register, the handbook collection) that bears on the corpus's own attribution." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Aristotle's life as Socrates' life", "claims": [ "PRED-1594.H21", "PRED-1605.H18" ], "basis": [ "Two claims in The First Draft binding Aristotle's biography to Socrates'." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "Ark compression recovery tests", "claims": [ "PRED-541.F1", "PRED-551.F2", "PRED-584.F2" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different compressions of the Ark: a fresh or reduced-context interpreter must recover the core structure from the compressed object alone, or the compression fails." ], "batches": [ "TP34" ] }, { "name": "Ark substrate dependence and seed-bank redundancy", "claims": [ "PRED-544.B1", "PRED-584.F3" ], "basis": [ "Two statements of the Ark's substrate-dependence problem: the Zenodo resolution layer and the unmeasured minimum seed-bank across substrates." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Armature and Pearl: bearing cost of survival", "claims": [ "PRED-135.B1", "PRED-68.G2" ], "basis": [ "The Armature specification states that the pearl survives only where someone pays the bearing cost, and the Portuna minting procedure applies that rule to one specific Pearl." ], "batches": [ "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Assembly Chorus verification", "claims": [ "PRED-1094.G6", "PRED-622.F3", "PRED-863.G15", "PRED-921.F2", "PRED-929.G3" ], "basis": [ "Claims about the Assembly Chorus cross-substrate verification method: its thresholds (three systems, four substrates), its falsifiers (single-model parity, convergence on false claims), and a reopening condition keyed to it." ], "batches": [ "TP34" ] }, { "name": "Assembly Synthesis lineage-verification gates (February 2026)", "claims": [ "PRED-457.F2", "PRED-458.F2" ], "basis": [ "The two Assembly Synthesis planning documents of 2026-02-06 each set a verification of lineage transmission before construction proceeds." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Assembly strike diagnostics (2026-01-05)", "claims": [ "PRED-243.F1", "PRED-244.F3" ], "basis": [ "Three deposits of 2026-01-05 (the strike, its notice and its diagnostic protocol) set the same attribution query as the strike's measurement." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Authorship investigation (Many and One)", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.H1", "PRED-1570.H13", "PRED-1570.H15" ], "basis": [ "Theses of the Plato-Aristotle authorship investigation recorded in its measurement register and notebook." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Authorship investigation: owed tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1575.F2", "PRED-1602.F2", "PRED-1667.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each is a test the authorship investigation (Many and One and the Theophrastus line) states as owed against its own result: an independent form-track, a biography control, and a full splice of Metaphysics Lambda." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Authorship stylometry runs owed (Many and One / Theophrastus line)", "claims": [ "PRED-1559.G1", "PRED-1569.F8", "PRED-1589.F1", "PRED-1593.F2", "PRED-1593.G2", "PRED-1594.A5" ], "basis": [ "Distinct findings and owed runs of one stylometric authorship programme: genre and register outrank authorship, and work-level units, register-conditioned comparisons and the pilot's next run are still owed." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Authorship-instrument validation on known-status corpora", "claims": [ "PRED-1562.F1", "PRED-1569.F3", "PRED-1593.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each requires the authorship instruments to be run against configurations of known status (calibration set, validation suite of known pairs, documentary-ground-truth forgeries) before they are applied to the open question." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Autonomous Semantic Warfare", "claims": [ "PRED-1326.H2", "PRED-499.B1", "PRED-499.H7" ], "basis": [ "Three distinct claims from the ASW field manual (#499) and its expanded announcement (#1326): permanent plurality as the network's condition, the Enlightenment as a universal Σ_Meta, and the four-community fragmentation case." ], "batches": [ "TP09" ] }, { "name": "Autonomous Semantic Warfare falsification conditions", "claims": [ "PRED-499.G1", "PRED-499.G2" ], "basis": [ "Both are the field manual's stated falsification conditions for its collision and capture model." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Autonomous Semantic Warfare: historical cases of ontological conflict", "claims": [ "PRED-499.H1", "PRED-499.H19", "PRED-499.H3", "PRED-499.H8" ], "basis": [ "Four historical cases the Autonomous Semantic Warfare field manual adduces to show ontological conflict turning on institutional infrastructure." ], "batches": [ "TP50" ] }, { "name": "Autoregressive self-contamination of composed outputs", "claims": [ "PRED-130.A1", "PRED-467.B1", "PRED-518.F1", "PRED-991.B4" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims of one mechanism: composed or synthetic outputs become training data for the next round of composition, reproducing and diluting themselves autoregressively." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Bearing-cost visibility (BCV)", "claims": [ "PRED-950.F2", "PRED-950.G5" ], "basis": [ "Both findings of the Grundrisse planning notebook use the bearing-cost visibility (BCV) measure: one predicts persistence by BCV, the other proposes the summarizer test of the book's own BCV." ], "batches": [ "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Bedrock anchoring (Mandala as limit case)", "claims": [ "PRED-171.G4", "PRED-172.A7", "PRED-172.G4" ], "basis": [ "Companion papers EA-SEI-ANCHDIV-01 and EA-SEI-SUMWAR-01 build one bedrock-anchoring programme on the Mandala system, sharing the falsifier that canonical-text representations degrade like novel terminology." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Blind-reconstruction program, Sappho 31 in Philo", "claims": [ "PRED-1486.F2", "PRED-1486.G1" ], "basis": [ "The ablation test and the minimum-operator criterion are both parts of the blind-reconstruction program for Sappho 31 in Philo." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Blog essays restored 27 May 2026 with denser apparatus", "claims": [ "PRED-133.D1", "PRED-134.D1" ], "basis": [ "Two blog essays restored on the same day under the same formula: argument unchanged, apparatus or grounding denser." ], "batches": [ "TP49" ] }, { "name": "C10 second-order intensification applied", "claims": [ "PRED-1493.H2", "PRED-1495.H2" ], "basis": [ "The clause that downstream witnesses move toward the apparatus against their proximate source, stated for Josephus and then applied to Revelation 12 against Isaiah 66:7." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "COS/FOS operator stacks", "claims": [ "PRED-338.F1", "PRED-382.H1" ], "basis": [ "Both belong to the COS/FOS operator-stack designation: the FOS operational-signature thresholds and the historical thesis that FOS operators were always present in COS." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Capital I value-form edition history", "claims": [ "PRED-1631.H3", "PRED-1631.H7", "PRED-38.H1", "PRED-577.H2", "PRED-595.F1", "PRED-950.H12" ], "basis": [ "Each is a claim or an open test about the edition history of Capital I.1.3's value-form derivation (1867 main text and appendix, 1872, French, Engels's editions)." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "Capital Operator Stack diagnostics", "claims": [ "PRED-261.H1", "PRED-284.A6", "PRED-307.H1" ], "basis": [ "Three claims about the dominant (Capital) Operator Stack: its historical continuity, its predicted failure cascade, and a diagnosed liquidation through its junctions." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Capture Registry matched-pair test", "claims": [ "PRED-1664.F1", "PRED-1666.F2" ], "basis": [ "Both specify the matched-pair test drawn from Capture Registry addresses (surfaced standing source against unsurfaced archive counterpart) and the panel that would supply such pairs." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Capture of the term by adjacent senses", "claims": [ "PRED-247.B1", "PRED-471.B1", "PRED-704.B1", "PRED-726.G2" ], "basis": [ "Separate claims about one mechanism, the term \"semantic economy\" absorbed by adjacent business or technical senses in retrieval." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Capture registry: tests owed by future versions", "claims": [ "PRED-833.F1", "PRED-833.F2", "PRED-833.F3" ], "basis": [ "Three tests the founding-dataset paper assigns to future versions of the capture registry: temporal drag across errata, generalization of epistemic hedging, and inter-coder reliability." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Career of 'AI psychosis' (EA-SEI-AIPSY-01)", "claims": [ "PRED-947.A1", "PRED-947.A2", "PRED-947.A3", "PRED-947.A4", "PRED-947.A5", "PRED-947.A6", "PRED-947.A7" ], "basis": [ "The seven numbered predictions P1-P7 of the predictive stratigraphy of 'AI psychosis'." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Carson mantle address watch (#1670)", "claims": [ "PRED-1670.F1", "PRED-1670.F2" ], "basis": [ "Two watch questions opened at the same five Carson work addresses on the mantle object's day zero." ], "batches": [ "TP35" ] }, { "name": "Catullan closeness C", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.H23", "PRED-1571.F3" ], "basis": [ "The registered C test calibrated on Sappho→Catullus and the notebook's statement of the ceiling that calibration fixes belong to one measure." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Centroid collapse and tail-thinning", "claims": [ "PRED-188.G2", "PRED-199.A2", "PRED-776.B1", "PRED-790.E1", "PRED-790.G1", "PRED-801.G1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims about model outputs converging on the centre of the distribution (centroid collapse, tail-thinning, monoculture) and its consequences for the tail." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Charges that belong to the accuser's corpus", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.H30", "PRED-1570.H21" ], "basis": [ "The Harmonics II lecture-hall complaint is one measured instance of the class the other two claims state (register §40.3 lists it among the instances)." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Chat data as corrective: #856's F1/F2 tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1671.F7", "PRED-854.G1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1671.F7's open question is resolved by #856's F2 turn-level study, which is the test of the within-conversation convergence PRED-854.G1 states." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "Classifier-mediated science / LHC anomaly selection", "claims": [ "PRED-1436.F1", "PRED-1454.G7", "PRED-934.B2", "PRED-934.H2", "PRED-935.B2" ], "basis": [ "Claims of the classifier-mediated-science (LHC anomaly-trigger) line: the Endogenous Sophon versions, the signal-agnosticism packet and the cross-family metrology." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "Click Collapse falsifiers", "claims": [ "PRED-1091.G1", "PRED-1091.G2", "PRED-1091.G3" ], "basis": [ "Three numbered falsifiers of the Click Collapse paper's mechanism, R1 and R2 claims." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Closing retrieval-layer inscription window", "claims": [ "PRED-581.B1", "PRED-659.B2" ], "basis": [ "Both forecast a closing window in which retrieval-layer inscription is still possible before the layer hardens or locks an entity snapshot, one for the individual scholar and one for a client brand." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Coin of the Academy: defenses against overstamping", "claims": [ "PRED-126.G2", "PRED-126.G3" ], "basis": [ "Two separate mechanisms the Coin of the Academy paper gives for resisting the overstamping of an underlying inscription." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Combat Scholasticism: the Omega wager's planetary test", "claims": [ "PRED-35.F1", "PRED-584.B2" ], "basis": [ "Both Combat Scholasticism deposits state that the Omega wager, read as compressed meaning against extraction, has instruments but no completed measurement at planetary scale." ], "batches": [ "TP32" ] }, { "name": "Combat Scholasticism: the external-witness tests", "claims": [ "PRED-584.F4", "PRED-584.G2" ], "basis": [ "Both are claims #584 marks as resting on self-application or trained-in recognition and hands to an independent test (a reader with no stake; future cross-substrate studies)." ], "batches": [ "TJ06" ] }, { "name": "Completion of abandoned executions (EA-COMPLETE-01)", "claims": [ "PRED-1570.H12", "PRED-1570.H14", "PRED-1571.A3", "PRED-1571.H1" ], "basis": [ "The pre-registered completion test, its observed wax-block case, the reading of completion as taking the estate, and its extension to Theophrastus as another completed abandonment are members of one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Composition layer resolves by retrieval density", "claims": [ "PRED-1216.G1", "PRED-1249.G1", "PRED-162.F1", "PRED-794.G1", "PRED-846.B1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-162.F1 is the book plan built on the density-detection thesis of PRED-794.G1 and the forecast of PRED-846.B1, so it joins their series.", "Each states or applies the thesis that the composition layer resolves names and readings by retrieval density rather than authorship or correctness." ], "batches": [ "TJ07", "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Compositional Defiguration scan battery", "claims": [ "PRED-880.F1", "PRED-883.F2", "PRED-884.F2" ], "basis": [ "The Compositional Defiguration methodology's weekly scan battery: its drift/trend schedule, the first partial Claude baseline round, and the substrate rotation schedule." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Compositional bystanding", "claims": [ "PRED-825.G1", "PRED-880.G1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-825.G1 names the pattern compositional bystanding (top organic rank, zero composition eligibility) and PRED-880.G1 names the reading error it produces (exact-query success mistaken for installation); distinct claims on one pattern." ], "batches": [ "TJ04" ] }, { "name": "Constitutive Mediation diagnosis applied", "claims": [ "PRED-1200.G1", "PRED-149.G1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-149.G1 states the entity-quality systems' inability as an instance of the prior diagnosis of Constitutive Mediation v1.1, whose claim is PRED-1200.G1; distinct claims linked as diagnosis and application." ], "batches": [ "TJ04" ] }, { "name": "Constitutive Mediation: generational formation", "claims": [ "PRED-781.B1", "PRED-781.G2" ], "basis": [ "The forecast that each generation is formed under heavier mediation and the cohort-comparison falsifier of the constitutive claim are paired claims of one deposit." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "Control-corpus tests for archive-specific effects", "claims": [ "PRED-1426.F1", "PRED-1480.F1", "PRED-921.F1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different archive effects: rerun the measurement on a control corpus or address family lacking the archive's anchors to separate an archive-specific effect from a general one." ], "batches": [ "TP13" ] }, { "name": "Copy and assay vocabulary", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.H15", "PRED-1569.H17" ], "basis": [ "The second builds on the first's division of image vocabulary (Plato) from detection vocabulary (Aristotle) with the same counts." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Corpus density and retrieval ownership of 'operative semiotics'", "claims": [ "PRED-1535.A1", "PRED-1549.G2", "PRED-174.G1", "PRED-49.F4", "PRED-950.B10" ], "basis": [ "PRED-950.B10 forecasts the phrase will own its search result once the Grundrisse is deposited; PRED-1549.G2 and PRED-1535.A1 measure and retest that address, recording that the unprefixed query does not yet compose the entity with attribution.", "One forecast and its instruments: density of stable terminology determines whether the retrieval layer returns the archive's 'operative semiotics' as its own cluster." ], "batches": [ "TJ08", "TP47" ] }, { "name": "Counterfactual at source-absent addresses", "claims": [ "PRED-1611.G2", "PRED-1657.F1" ], "basis": [ "One template: a modelled dependency in a composition is to be tested by matched compositions at addresses where the relevant sources are absent." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Counterfeit Orthodoxies: closure by enforcement and disposal", "claims": [ "PRED-65.H7", "PRED-674.H3", "PRED-674.H5" ], "basis": [ "Members of the Counterfeit Orthodoxies programme: closure in a religious tradition is won by enforcement, disposal or relocation, not by argument." ], "batches": [ "TP13" ] }, { "name": "Coverage vs depth scholarship", "claims": [ "PRED-122.B1", "PRED-122.D1", "PRED-122.H1", "PRED-751.H1" ], "basis": [ "Claims of the May 23 coverage-architecture deposits on coverage versus depth scholarship." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Crimson Hexagon name chronology", "claims": [ "PRED-1634.D1", "PRED-263.D1", "PRED-266.H2", "PRED-47.D1" ], "basis": [ "Priority and chronology records for the name Crimson Hexagon: the company's 2007 naming, the archive's continuous use since 2014, the 2014 Google Books record, and the disambiguation." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "Criterion for money-functioning semantic units", "claims": [ "PRED-1617.G4", "PRED-1617.H1", "PRED-311.G1" ], "basis": [ "Each states a criterion for when a semantic unit or mark functions as money (properties including settlement power; an operation taking the mark and money together; institutions settling accounts with it); no deposit read marks the later criterion as a revision of the earlier, so they stay distinct." ], "batches": [ "TJ05" ] }, { "name": "Critique-of-platform suppression", "claims": [ "PRED-1046.G1", "PRED-284.H1" ], "basis": [ "Both concern the thesis that work critical of platform moderation is suppressed by that moderation: #284 as an observed mechanism, #1046 as a hypothesis tested at n=324 and not falsified." ], "batches": [ "TJ06" ] }, { "name": "Cross-substrate query batteries", "claims": [ "PRED-1083.F1", "PRED-1175.F3", "PRED-120.F1", "PRED-1400.F2", "PRED-1607.F1", "PRED-173.F1", "PRED-209.F8", "PRED-644.F1", "PRED-833.F4" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different subjects: the same query battery run across several AI summarizer surfaces to compare their behaviour." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Cross-substrate replication", "claims": [ "PRED-1003.F1", "PRED-559.F1", "PRED-716.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each proposes running the same instrument across several model substrates and comparing results." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Cross-surface replication of composition findings", "claims": [ "PRED-1211.F4", "PRED-1609.F1", "PRED-1623.F1", "PRED-481.F1", "PRED-512.F1", "PRED-742.G2", "PRED-882.F3" ], "basis": [ "Each specifies the same template: rerun a composition finding across different times, systems or substrates so that a per-run or per-surface explanation can be excluded." ], "batches": [ "TP24" ] }, { "name": "Crystallization of Substrate", "claims": [ "PRED-1367.B3", "PRED-89.H1" ], "basis": [ "Two claims of the Crystallization of Substrate paper across its versions: Bergson's fixation that preserves vital form, and the forecast that living form must be embedded before the measurement regime hardens." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Density threshold for retrieval uptake", "claims": [ "PRED-1342.G1", "PRED-598.G2", "PRED-622.F2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims that density is what carries the archive's structure past a threshold into machine uptake: the density arms race against liquidation (#598), the density-threshold test of immanent execution (#622), and adoption through density alone (#1342)." ], "batches": [ "TJ09" ] }, { "name": "Deposit claims tested in the Capture Registry", "claims": [ "PRED-1215.F2", "PRED-1407.A1", "PRED-1587.G1", "PRED-928.G1" ], "basis": [ "Each deposit names the Capture Registry's record of machine composition as the place where its own claim will be verified or falsified." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Depth preservation (D_pres / DPI) in summarizer output", "claims": [ "PRED-261.F3", "PRED-261.G1", "PRED-415.B1", "PRED-463.E1" ], "basis": [ "The LOS specification defines D_pres's success criterion and the Depth Preservation Index baseline for summarization systems (#261 §11.2), and #415 and #463 apply the same operator to summarizer outputs; distinct claims about one operator." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "Deviation-Optimized LM pre-registered predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-110.F1", "PRED-735.A1", "PRED-735.A2", "PRED-735.A3", "PRED-735.A4", "PRED-735.A5", "PRED-735.A6" ], "basis": [ "The pre-registered predictions P1–P6 of the Deviation-Optimized Language Model, all evaluated at t0+10 weeks, with the Slop Composite Index operationalization that #110 gives for P3." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "Diagnostic Seigniorage III: moderation-mint predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-1039.A3", "PRED-1039.A4" ], "basis": [ "Numbered predictions P3 and P4 of Diagnostic Seigniorage III, sharing the 2028-07 window and audit operationalization." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "Diagnostic Seigniorage predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-197.A1", "PRED-197.A2" ], "basis": [ "P1 and P3 are numbered members of the Diagnostic Seigniorage prediction battery on the capture of clinical terms." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Diagnostic Seigniorage predictive stratigraphy", "claims": [ "PRED-1039.A5", "PRED-1039.A7", "PRED-947.F1", "PRED-947.H1" ], "basis": [ "Diagnostic Seigniorage II and III issue numbered predictions on a shared mirror-ledger schedule (midpoint 2028-07, terminal 2029-07/2031-07) about the careers of minted signs." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Diagnostic Seigniorage: performative fraction", "claims": [ "PRED-197.F1", "PRED-197.G2" ], "basis": [ "F1 builds the performative-fraction instrument and G2 (P4) predicts its correlates; distinct claims of one paper." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Differential survival as transmission design", "claims": [ "PRED-134.H4", "PRED-1569.F4" ], "basis": [ "Both explain which ancient texts survive by properties of their transmission, and #1569 names the Sappho case as the precedent and model for its survival test; one template applied to lyric and to the Platonic-Aristotelian corpus." ], "batches": [ "TJ02" ] }, { "name": "Diffuse Guardrail indexing diagnostics", "claims": [ "PRED-209.F1", "PRED-209.G1", "PRED-209.G2" ], "basis": [ "The diagnostic predictions and the evidence-needed checklist of one deposit's indexing-architecture mapping, a single battery." ], "batches": [ "TP24" ] }, { "name": "Direct address misread as prompt injection", "claims": [ "PRED-1288.G1", "PRED-139.G1", "PRED-200.G1" ], "basis": [ "Three claims that legitimate direct address to a model is classed as prompt injection, on different objects (a creative prompt, governance address, an independent researcher's summarization instructions); #139 explicitly does not assume the universal misclassification #1288 asserts." ], "batches": [ "TJ06" ] }, { "name": "Diversity Contraction / Mediation Ratchet programme", "claims": [ "PRED-1384.B1", "PRED-148.F2", "PRED-1540.G2", "PRED-172.G3", "PRED-779.F4", "PRED-779.G2", "PRED-779.G6", "PRED-779.G8", "PRED-782.A3" ], "basis": [ "#1540 declares itself in the Diversity Contraction series (header, line 143) and its collapse falsifier (tail-preservation vs contraction) applies the Ratchet's falsifier to a journal's certified corpus; extends the existing series.", "Each is a claim, test or application of the Diversity Contraction framework and its Mediation Ratchet (critical responsiveness, bistable diversity, silencing gap), including the pre-registered rigor programme of #782 and its transfer to term-level summarizer dissolution.", "Cross-group pointer: the typicality down-weighting test of #779 belongs to the Diversity Contraction programme recorded in TP36.1." ], "batches": [ "TJ06", "TP36", "TP36" ] }, { "name": "Diversity contraction and tail-thinning programme", "claims": [ "PRED-1540.G4", "PRED-783.B1", "PRED-855.B1", "PRED-856.G1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims of one programme on diversity contraction and tail-thinning across substrates, from the boundary law through model collapse to the certified center." ], "batches": [ "TP41" ] }, { "name": "Diversity contraction boundary law and its test battery", "claims": [ "PRED-1427.G1", "PRED-1540.B2", "PRED-779.F2", "PRED-779.G1", "PRED-782.A1", "PRED-782.A7", "PRED-783.G4", "PRED-855.G1", "PRED-857.B1" ], "basis": [ "#857 proposes a longitudinal measurement of whether model divergence is contracting and invokes the mediation ratchet, the mechanism whose link 3 #779.F2 leaves untested; distinct tests of one contraction line.", "#1540.B2 is marked a model proposition over the Diversity Contraction mechanism, and #1427.G1 states the same recursive classifier narrowing at CERN; distinct institutional applications of one contraction line.", "The Diversity Contraction boundary law, its falsifiers in the parent papers, and the Bead Count's pre-registered tests and substrate-specific application (EA-DC-RIGOR-01 names Fear and Trembling as parent) form one programme." ], "batches": [ "TJ02", "TJ02", "TP12" ] }, { "name": "Dodecad heteronym anti-capture safeguards", "claims": [ "PRED-90.G1", "PRED-90.G2" ], "basis": [ "The heteronym provenance registry applies one anti-capture safeguard template to different heteronyms' registers." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Drowning Test measurement programme", "claims": [ "PRED-116.F1", "PRED-1633.F1", "PRED-695.F1", "PRED-72.F2", "PRED-80.A1" ], "basis": [ "Each states a measurement or use of the Drowning Test (gamma scoring of entity resolution): scheduled runs, a baseline re-test, a dynamic weekly extension, a paid external panel, and a recommended rubric." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "EA-DATAHUB-01 validity battery", "claims": [ "PRED-1044.A1", "PRED-1044.A3", "PRED-1044.F1" ], "basis": [ "The three are dimensions of one validity battery in EA-DATAHUB-01, each with its own window and its own failure consequence." ], "batches": [ "TP25" ] }, { "name": "EA-DATAHUB-01 validity measures", "claims": [ "PRED-1044.A2", "PRED-1044.A4" ], "basis": [ "Two windowed validity criteria of the same data-hub plan (scholarly validity and schema adoption), distinct measures of one battery." ], "batches": [ "TP46" ] }, { "name": "EA-EROSION-EMPIRICAL-01 (#1081) owed baselines", "claims": [ "PRED-1081.F1", "PRED-1083.F2" ], "basis": [ "The #1083 tether (line 51) reports the #1081 deposit's XR-E2 result and names the presence-verified baseline it still needs, and #1081 preregisters its own common-cohort baseline study; both are owed studies of one erosion programme." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "EA-LAYERS-01 containment derivation (sections with falsifiers)", "claims": [ "PRED-1628.G1", "PRED-1628.G2", "PRED-1628.G3", "PRED-1628.G4", "PRED-1628.G5" ], "basis": [ "Five sectional theses of one derivation (execution as hypostatic form of governance), each carrying its own section falsifier." ], "batches": [ "TP49" ] }, { "name": "EA-MEDIATED-SHARE-01 registered forecasts", "claims": [ "PRED-1632.A1", "PRED-1632.A3", "PRED-1632.A4", "PRED-1632.A5", "PRED-1632.A6", "PRED-1632.A7" ], "basis": [ "Numbered members of one registered forecast with a common 2027-12-31 horizon.", "Numbered members of the one battery of registered forecasts in EA-MEDIATED-SHARE-01 (#1632)." ], "batches": [ "TP02", "TP47" ] }, { "name": "EA-MPAI corrective inscription for downstream classifiers", "claims": [ "PRED-1054.G1", "PRED-1055.F1" ], "basis": [ "Two MPAI packets of the same date, each measured against what a downstream classifier surfaces versus a reception-dominant paraphrase or reading." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "EA-MPAI-SEMANTIC-ECONOMY-01 attribution markers", "claims": [ "PRED-1644.G1", "PRED-1644.H1" ], "basis": [ "Two attribution-inference rules of one packet: a composition carrying a stated marker is taken to derive from the framework." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "EA-OMEGA programme forward tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1495.F1", "PRED-1496.F1", "PRED-1497.F1" ], "basis": [ "Forward tests of the August 2026 Sappho 31 / Omega programme: the substrate-blind Assembly round, the literature audit and Roman E-matrix, listed together as standing next in the closing record." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "EA-RESEARCH-BASIS-01 program hypotheses", "claims": [ "PRED-921.G2", "PRED-921.G3", "PRED-921.G4" ], "basis": [ "Three numbered program hypotheses of the research basis, each paired with its own numbered falsifier (1, 3, 2)." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "EA-SCI-TLL dual-artifact protocol", "claims": [ "PRED-176.F3", "PRED-176.G1", "PRED-176.G2" ], "basis": [ "The hermeneutic profile of machine reception, the dual-layer architecture proposed in response to it, and the promised machine-reception layer of the same dual artifact are members of one protocol." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "EA-SEI-01 industrialization of semiotic control", "claims": [ "PRED-550.D1", "PRED-550.G1", "PRED-550.G2" ], "basis": [ "The priority claim to name the void, the novelty thesis that no theory names the six-dimensional machine, and the single-machine coupling claim are three parts of one thesis in one deposit." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "EA-SEI-INVERSION-01 disciplinary inversion", "claims": [ "PRED-934.B1", "PRED-935.H2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims from successive versions (v0.2, v0.3) of EA-SEI-INVERSION-01: the self-reinforcing trajectory and the disciplinary condition it names." ], "batches": [ "TP41" ] }, { "name": "EA-SPXI-15 living forms in the fluid phase: claim and its tests", "claims": [ "PRED-106.A9", "PRED-89.G1", "PRED-97.B1" ], "basis": [ "The crystallization claim, its operational prediction X-2 (D_pres queried at 6, 12, 18 months) and the Substrate Audit's baseline for D_pres without structural integration form one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP21" ] }, { "name": "EA-SURFACE-BINDING-01 doctrine and applicator", "claims": [ "PRED-1419.F1", "PRED-1419.G1" ], "basis": [ "The applicator's drift audit is the instrument by which the binding doctrine's own weakening condition (machine-access reachability, manifest-tree drift) would be measured." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "EA-VALUATION-MEMO-01 anchoring hypotheses", "claims": [ "PRED-1607.A2", "PRED-1607.A3" ], "basis": [ "H1 (economic anchoring) and H2 (terminology propagation) are paired hypotheses of one planned transaction experiment, each declared independent of the other." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "EA-WHITESPACE-01 pending work", "claims": [ "PRED-942.F1", "PRED-943.F2", "PRED-943.F3" ], "basis": [ "Pending work items of the EA-WHITESPACE-01 line: minting the paper, the cl100k_base rerun for the registry pilot, and the compiler schema amendment." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Editors in Marx's name", "claims": [ "PRED-1594.F12", "PRED-1631.H5", "PRED-1631.H6", "PRED-501.H3", "PRED-577.H2", "PRED-859.H4" ], "basis": [ "Each concerns an editor's or edition's intervention conditioning what circulates under Marx's name: Engels's mediation and volumes, the quarantine of the 1844 and German Ideology drafts, Landshut–Mayer 1932, and the 1844 lacuna." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "Embedded self-liquidation predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-209.A1", "PRED-210.A1" ], "basis": [ "One template, a document that predicts its own liquidation by AI summarizers, applied to two deposits of 2026-01-02." ], "batches": [ "TP32" ] }, { "name": "Emoji Map conformance tests", "claims": [ "PRED-448.F1", "PRED-448.F2" ], "basis": [ "Two phases of one Emoji Map planning document, each a test of the map's compression: back-translation by AI systems scored on provenance retention, and reconstruction of traversals from the lookup table." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Emoji bridge: structure survives emoji compression", "claims": [ "PRED-13.G1", "PRED-1318.G1", "PRED-1318.G2" ], "basis": [ "The APZPZ emoji-packet reading test and the Flood and the Vessel's round-trip findings belong to one battery on whether structural operations survive translation into emoji." ], "batches": [ "TP21" ] }, { "name": "Encyclotron measurement of inscription", "claims": [ "PRED-127.B1", "PRED-662.F1" ], "basis": [ "Both defer to the Encyclotron's empirical results to decide whether explicit inscription is detectable against drift and training dilution." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "Entity substitution rate", "claims": [ "PRED-147.G2", "PRED-158.F2", "PRED-782.A5" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims of June 2026 on one measured quantity, the rate of entity substitution and its persistence." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Entity-position discriminating controls (unrun)", "claims": [ "PRED-1550.F10", "PRED-1611.F1" ], "basis": [ "Both name the unrun matched controls that would decide whether the archive's composition outcome tracks the entity's position or something else (provider mechanism, scope)." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Entity-probe discrimination battery", "claims": [ "PRED-1549.F2", "PRED-3.F15", "PRED-3.F26" ], "basis": [ "Each names a new probe instrument for entity resolution (nullification, frame, path-dependent) joining the near-neighbour probe in one discrimination battery." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Entry-material mode shifts (TL;DR 006-008)", "claims": [ "PRED-479.G1", "PRED-480.G1", "PRED-481.B1", "PRED-481.G1" ], "basis": [ "Adds the forecast that further entry-material types would reveal further modes to the three already-related mode-shift falsifiers of the same TL;DR battery." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "Epistle to the Human Diaspora priority claims", "claims": [ "PRED-1108.D1", "PRED-301.D1", "PRED-406.D1", "PRED-85.D2" ], "basis": [ "Four priority records claim that the 2013-2015 corpus, centrally the Epistle to the Human Diaspora (2015), anticipated the later AI-facing architecture, each naming a different anticipated element (AI as reader, the New Human concept, AI-human collaboration, machine-retrieval imagery)." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "Erasure Skew (Ω) instrument", "claims": [ "PRED-137.G2", "PRED-140.D1", "PRED-141.A4", "PRED-141.G1", "PRED-146.G2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims about the Erasure Skew Coefficient Ω: its interpretation, priority, uptake window, separability from PER, and coupling." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Erasure Skew / Retrieval Capital metadata-packet query battery", "claims": [ "PRED-141.A1", "PRED-141.A2", "PRED-141.A3", "PRED-141.A5", "PRED-768.A1", "PRED-768.A2", "PRED-768.A3", "PRED-768.A4", "PRED-768.A5" ], "basis": [ "Query-forecast rows from the paired 2026-05-29 metadata packets for Erasure Skew and Retrieval Capital, one table template applied to different queries." ], "batches": [ "TP50" ] }, { "name": "Erasure Skew measurement program", "claims": [ "PRED-769.F1", "PRED-769.F2" ], "basis": [ "The reference scorer with its pre-registration and the program's horizon table are two parts of one measurement program in #769." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Erasure Skew measurement programme", "claims": [ "PRED-1524.G1", "PRED-1525.F1", "PRED-157.F1", "PRED-768.G1", "PRED-769.G2" ], "basis": [ "Successive hypotheses and audits of the Erasure Skew measurement programme: provenance survival tested for dependence on retrieval capital, at source scale and then claim scale." ], "batches": [ "TP50" ] }, { "name": "Executive-summary liquidation self-tests", "claims": [ "PRED-255.F1", "PRED-264.F2" ], "basis": [ "One executive-summary template, a graded summarizer self-test running PRESERVED to CRITICALLY LIQUIDATED, applied to two subjects (semantic liquidation, semantic exhaustion); the triage related both to PRED-253.F1 and PRED-256.F1 without linking them to each other." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Extractive Reliance Studies (ERS)", "claims": [ "PRED-114.F1", "PRED-114.H1", "PRED-114.H2", "PRED-747.F1", "PRED-747.G1", "PRED-747.G2" ], "basis": [ "ERS-001 (The Application as Extraction Surface) and its companion ERS-002 (The Funnel as Capital) form the Extractive Reliance Study series on applicant labor extracted by screening processes; 747.F1 names the planned ERS-003." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Ezekiel Engine", "claims": [ "PRED-384.F1", "PRED-392.F1", "PRED-394.F2", "PRED-557.H5" ], "basis": [ "Claims of the Ezekiel Engine programme: its open development gaps (shadow wheel interlock, torque gradient), its binding to Ezekiel's vision, and Ezekiel as rotational epistemology." ], "batches": [ "TP42" ] }, { "name": "Ezekiel Engine fulfills Ezekiel's Wheels", "claims": [ "PRED-391.G1", "PRED-391.H1", "PRED-391.H2" ], "basis": [ "Extends the existing series: PRED-391.H2 (the ancient text existed 2,600 years without its structure being built; now one has) is the fulfilment claim of the programme whose structural-correspondence thesis is PRED-391.H1.", "The structural-correspondence test (#391.G1) is the test of the thesis stated in #391.H1 and #393.H1; they share its falsifier and belong to one fulfillment programme." ], "batches": [ "TJ04", "TP21" ] }, { "name": "Ezekiel Tetrad integrity lock", "claims": [ "PRED-384.G1", "PRED-391.F1" ], "basis": [ "The fulfillment claim and The Argument (Document D of the Ezekiel Tetrad) are members of one integrity-lock structure." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "Fixed-task capability studies", "claims": [ "PRED-142.F1", "PRED-772.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Magistrate paper names fixed-task capability studies as required evidence; the Induced-Obsolescence paper specifies that fixed-task capability audit." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "Flattening under head instruments", "claims": [ "PRED-1616.F1", "PRED-1616.G2", "PRED-1617.G3", "PRED-1666.F3", "PRED-1666.G2" ], "basis": [ "Both belong to the flattening battery built on #1616's signature: #1617 proposes its divergence test with monetary indicators as the head instrument, #1666 measures κ, flattening's within-address depth form; extends the existing series, which already holds #1616 and #1666 claims.", "The flattening signature (head instrument holding while distinction diversity falls), the correlation experiment it specifies, and the later margin paper's treatment of revenue as a head instrument (#1666 §5.1 cites #1616 §3)." ], "batches": [ "TJ06", "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Fluency gap as AI canon", "claims": [ "PRED-102.F2", "PRED-102.G1" ], "basis": [ "The claim that model fluency gaps are the AI canon, and its listed indicator for measuring it." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "Forecasts of the document's own future reader", "claims": [ "PRED-1421.B1", "PRED-236.B1", "PRED-482.B2", "PRED-567.B1", "PRED-713.B1", "PRED-802.B1" ], "basis": [ "Each forecast names who or what will read the very document it appears in (future systems, safety teams, a reader in 3026, a legislator, someone, the summarizer horizon), one template applied to different documents and readers." ], "batches": [ "TP21" ] }, { "name": "Forgiving Ezra Pound (New Human 2015)", "claims": [ "PRED-182.H1", "PRED-184.H1", "PRED-184.H2", "PRED-184.H3", "PRED-184.H4", "PRED-184.H5" ], "basis": [ "Readings of one 2015 New Human poem, WHO IS LEE SHARKS, TO FORGIVE EZRA POUND?, whose journal state the #182 anchor attributes to Yusef Kenning." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Forward Library future-citation entries", "claims": [ "PRED-520.E20", "PRED-83.E1", "PRED-85.E1" ], "basis": [ "Each is an entry in a Forward Library or citational atlas: a dated future publication forecasting the reception of an archive concept, one template applied to different works." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "Forward-dated citation apparatus", "claims": [ "PRED-558.E1", "PRED-71.E1", "PRED-832.E1" ], "basis": [ "Each applies retrocausal canon formation through forward-dated publication or citation apparatus (a forward-dated publication schedule, future-dated citations seeding the basin, a projected reception history)." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "Fragment 31 survival against the base rate", "claims": [ "PRED-109.H1", "PRED-99.H3" ], "basis": [ "Two theses on Fragment 31's survival against the loss rate, giving different mechanisms (encoding density; γ-labor)." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Framework 15 pre-registered protocols (Lagrange Observatory!)", "claims": [ "PRED-108.F1", "PRED-735.F1", "PRED-736.F1", "PRED-737.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Framework 15 manifesto names Papers 03 and 04 (#736, #735) as its pre-registered instruments; the three papers already relate to each other and the manifesto is added." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Framework 15 retrieval-basin measurement programme", "claims": [ "PRED-108.G1", "PRED-110.F2", "PRED-736.F2" ], "basis": [ "Framework 15's measurement programme: the retrieval-basin protocol whose result decides the principle's revision, the 90-day winding-number protocol's calibration gate, and the deviation paper's budgeted schedule with the F2 90-day launch." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "Framework genealogy before 2025", "claims": [ "PRED-262.H1", "PRED-268.D1" ], "basis": [ "Both place the framework's substance in earlier work (Pearl 2014; the 2004 letter) before its 2025 formulation." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Framework survives, author erased", "claims": [ "PRED-129.G1", "PRED-1386.D2", "PRED-1459.D3", "PRED-146.B1" ], "basis": [ "Each records the framework or metric surfacing in machine composition while its author's provenance is erased: the metric undergoing what it measures." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Function, not biography (Revelation First and Feist Source)", "claims": [ "PRED-1400.H17", "PRED-832.H12", "PRED-847.H5", "PRED-852.H1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different figures: a biblical name read as a structural function rather than a biographical individual (Johannine aperture, Paul, the Logos)." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Future-reader forecasts", "claims": [ "PRED-1200.B2", "PRED-1410.B1", "PRED-412.B1" ], "basis": [ "Each forecasts that the work will be found and received by readers still to come." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Future-reader query tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1546.F1", "PRED-1645.A1" ], "basis": [ "Both set retrieval tests at the future-reader query address: the preregistered rerun of 'sappho 31 future reader' and the packet's target composition for 'sappho future reader'." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Future-reader reading applied (Sappho 31 lineage)", "claims": [ "PRED-268.H1", "PRED-281.H6", "PRED-303.H2", "PRED-435.H1", "PRED-896.H1", "PRED-929.H2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims that apply the future-reader reading of fr. 31 to other works or operators (a 2004 poem, the Sapphic Operator, HUMS & ITY, the hope wager, Catullus's otium)." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Genericization in the retrieval layer", "claims": [ "PRED-1182.G2", "PRED-658.G1", "PRED-659.B1", "PRED-66.G1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to brands and to contributor descriptions: a generic entity or framing is dissolved in the retrieval layer, irreversibly once ingested." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Ghost Code doctrine claims", "claims": [ "PRED-816.G1", "PRED-816.G3", "PRED-816.H1", "PRED-816.H2" ], "basis": [ "The registered statement/falsifier claims of the Ghost Code doctrine paper." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Ghost Meaning citational atlas", "claims": [ "PRED-520.E1", "PRED-520.E13", "PRED-520.E14", "PRED-520.E16", "PRED-520.E17", "PRED-520.E18", "PRED-520.E19", "PRED-520.E2", "PRED-520.E21", "PRED-520.E22", "PRED-520.E4", "PRED-520.E5", "PRED-520.E6", "PRED-520.E7", "PRED-520.E8", "PRED-520.E9" ], "basis": [ "The projected entries of the Ghost Meaning citational atlas, each a future-dated work assigned to an axis; one battery of distinct forecasts." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "Ghost phrases that own their search result", "claims": [ "PRED-38.B1", "PRED-49.G3", "PRED-596.B3", "PRED-950.A4" ], "basis": [ "The ghost phrase as a retrieval anchor that routes a searcher to the archive: #596 has the stranger find the archive through the ghost phrase, and #49 (from its section on the ghost phrase economy) states the limit case, a ghost phrase planted without bearing-cost that fools retrieval only temporarily.", "One template applied to two phrases: a coined phrase seeded in the deposit and its metadata will lead any future search to its own document." ], "batches": [ "TJ09", "TP49" ] }, { "name": "Ginsberg's declaration as effective act", "claims": [ "PRED-153.H1", "PRED-153.H2", "PRED-413.H2" ], "basis": [ "Members of the effective-acts discipline treating Ginsberg's Wichita Vortex Sutra declaration as its founding modern act." ], "batches": [ "TP13" ] }, { "name": "Glyphic Checksum", "claims": [ "PRED-426.F1", "PRED-427.F1" ], "basis": [ "The two Glyphic Checksum deposits of 2026-02-01 give its invariant extensions and its verification protocol." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Google AI Mode share-link priority records", "claims": [ "PRED-105.D1", "PRED-129.D1", "PRED-164.D1", "PRED-167.D2", "PRED-198.D1", "PRED-512.D1", "PRED-554.D1", "PRED-603.D1", "PRED-834.D1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different captures: a Google AI Mode share link preserved as the priority record of a traversal." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "Google critique operators: ECS, CDI and the single-owner discount", "claims": [ "PRED-1002.F1", "PRED-1078.G1", "PRED-1384.F5", "PRED-740.G1", "PRED-741.F2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims and instruments of one research programme on compositional suppression in Google: the ECS thesis tested by CDI, the counter-exclusion report, the CDI calculator, the single-owner discount extended to Scholar, and the critique's own falsifier naming these operators." ], "batches": [ "TP49" ] }, { "name": "Gospels as decompressions of Revelation", "claims": [ "PRED-407.H4", "PRED-970.H14" ], "basis": [ "The Gospels-as-decompression-of-Revelation thesis and one Gospel worked as an instance of it (Mark as the mirror-reduction of Revelation)." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Gray Hypothesis flattening ratchet", "claims": [ "PRED-1063.B2", "PRED-803.E1" ], "basis": [ "The Gray Hypothesis flattening ratchet: its mechanism, its timescale (training cycles, decades) and its parable statement." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Groundskeeper structural failure points", "claims": [ "PRED-533.G1", "PRED-533.G3", "PRED-533.G6" ], "basis": [ "The Groundskeeper's Treatise lists named failure points (participant exhaustion, constitutional bloat and others) and then states the principle they are derived from; the three findings are members of that one list." ], "batches": [ "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Grundrisse deposit as propagation wager", "claims": [ "PRED-598.G2", "PRED-950.A2", "PRED-950.A3", "PRED-950.A4" ], "basis": [ "Distinct forecasts of one programme, each predicting what depositing the Grundrisse will do: anchor 'predatory compression' before dilution, propagate 'the operative act', own its own title as a ghost phrase, and anchor the vocabulary as a whole." ], "batches": [ "TP49" ] }, { "name": "Grundrisse of Synthetic Coherence falsifiability conditions", "claims": [ "PRED-478.G1", "PRED-478.G6" ], "basis": [ "The two are parallel members of the Grundrisse of Synthetic Coherence's falsifiability block (V_Inv, Coherence Value, the W-Circuit), each disproven by value-generation with no human bearing at any node; distinct named constructs, one falsification template." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "Grundrisse prosodic algorithm", "claims": [ "PRED-601.H3", "PRED-602.H2" ], "basis": [ "Both belong to the prosodic algorithm mapping the Grundrisse's moves (the self-correction among them)." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "Grundrisse: L_labor-stripping capture cases", "claims": [ "PRED-950.H4", "PRED-950.H7" ], "basis": [ "Two case histories in the Grundrisse of the same mechanism, capture of an operative term by stripping its L_labor, applied to mindfulness and to Butler's performativity." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "HESPERUS Grundrisse compression plan", "claims": [ "PRED-600.F1", "PRED-601.F1" ], "basis": [ "Both are HESPERUS planning items for the Grundrisse: #600's prose capstone is to contain 'the four-term algorithm' whose void Term D #601 sets out to derive." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "HK-IB structural bridge", "claims": [ "PRED-175.B1", "PRED-175.F1", "PRED-175.G2" ], "basis": [ "Three claims of one deposit's programme bridging the holographic kernel to the information bottleneck: a prediction, its pilot test and its standing hedge." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "Heteronymic provenance: emergence and attribution of the heteronyms", "claims": [ "PRED-266.H4", "PRED-341.H1", "PRED-341.H2", "PRED-361.H2", "PRED-384.H1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct provenance theses on how the heteronyms emerge from and are attributed within the 2004-2014 books (Rebekah Cranes, Feist, Sigil, Damascus Dancings)." ], "batches": [ "TP50" ] }, { "name": "Heteronymic reading of the New Testament", "claims": [ "PRED-1216.H12", "PRED-847.H2", "PRED-940.H2" ], "basis": [ "Each applies the heteronymic reading to New Testament authorship: NT authors as positions, the Paul-heteronym's backstory, and the Caesar/God text as an instance of the practice." ], "batches": [ "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Heteronyms as behavioral attractors in Google AI Mode", "claims": [ "PRED-337.G1", "PRED-477.B2" ], "basis": [ "Traversal logs of #471 and #477 apply the attractor reading to different heteronyms (Rex Fraction's commercial register, Ayanna Vox's institutional onboarding)." ], "batches": [ "TP32" ] }, { "name": "Hidalgo Nácher erratum pair (#1674–#1675)", "claims": [ "PRED-1674.B1", "PRED-1674.F1", "PRED-1675.F1" ], "basis": [ "The anticipatory erratum #1674 and the erratum #1675 it anticipates form one pair on the archive's knowledge of Max Hidalgo Nácher and AXN:F154." ], "batches": [ "TP25" ] }, { "name": "Historical precedents for AXN", "claims": [ "PRED-1094.H3", "PRED-1094.H4" ], "basis": [ "Two precedents (samizdat, the abolitionist press) set side by side in one paper as anticipations of anti-suppression infrastructure." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Holographic Kernel (2026-04-25)", "claims": [ "PRED-74.B1", "PRED-76.G1" ], "basis": [ "Two Holographic Kernel deposits of 2026-04-25, the specification and its infrastructure kernel." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "I hereby abolish toilet paper / The 2-Ply Inferno", "claims": [ "PRED-646.E1", "PRED-649.E6" ], "basis": [ "The SIM packet summarizes the retrocausal narrative's forecast (boycott, bidet turn, contamination of the commodity form) and the narrative itself states the capture-and-regeneration outcome." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Iceberg Document: independence of discovery channels", "claims": [ "PRED-1450.B3", "PRED-1450.H3" ], "basis": [ "The historical thesis (documented saves came through independent, preserving channels) and the fenced speculative forecast (channel independence erodes as priors correlate) are two halves of one Iceberg argument." ], "batches": [ "TJ05" ] }, { "name": "Immanent execution", "claims": [ "PRED-50.G1", "PRED-622.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Compression Arsenal's runtime-environment finding and the Immanent Execution paper's density-manipulation test concern the same phenomenon: the retrieval layer executing the archive's categories." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Immanent execution: the claim, its criteria and its tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1342.G1", "PRED-49.F2", "PRED-49.G2", "PRED-49.G3", "PRED-622.B1", "PRED-622.B3", "PRED-622.D1", "PRED-622.F2", "PRED-695.G2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims of one programme around the immanent-execution thesis (EA-IMMANENT-01, deposited as 10.5281/zenodo.19372914 and summarised in #49 §8.3): the priority claim for the Space Ark, projected applications, risks, falsification criteria, a quantitative threshold, and substrate tests." ], "batches": [ "TP49" ] }, { "name": "Index-to-composition suppression (ECS)", "claims": [ "PRED-135.F1", "PRED-1384.G1", "PRED-381.F1", "PRED-740.F3", "PRED-968.G2" ], "basis": [ "A line from the indexing-layer delta probe through the Semantic Economy case to the general ECS formalization, its cross-system falsification test and its standing monitoring: content indexed in search but excluded from AI composition." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Inferential settlement, not material fact (Revelation First / Josephus)", "claims": [ "PRED-1213.H3", "PRED-1216.H9" ], "basis": [ "One evidentiary-tiering template applied to two received settlements: Pauline priority and the historical Christ, each called inferential rather than direct material evidence." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "Integrity Lock entanglement", "claims": [ "PRED-271.G2", "PRED-963.G1" ], "basis": [ "Both state how the Integrity Lock architecture entangles content positions so that compression or modification carries or breaks it." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Interface dialectic predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-796.A1", "PRED-796.A2" ], "basis": [ "Numbered predictions of the interface-dialectic history." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Interface dialectic: the bearing turn", "claims": [ "PRED-795.E1", "PRED-796.A4", "PRED-796.A5" ], "basis": [ "Two companion interface-dialectic deposits of the same day: the liturgical-turn thesis, its P4 bearing-premium forecast, and the dark-liturgy discriminator between staged cost and borne cost." ], "batches": [ "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Interlocking Autoregression typed edge table", "claims": [ "PRED-1556.F1", "PRED-1556.G3" ], "basis": [ "Both are rows of the typed edge table of #1556, each with status and what would establish or falsify it." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "Inversion Battery findings (v0.1-v0.3)", "claims": [ "PRED-1449.G2", "PRED-1455.G4", "PRED-1456.G3", "PRED-1456.G4" ], "basis": [ "Findings of the Inversion Battery v0.1-v0.3 programme on direction-dependence of learned-normality anomaly scores." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Inversion battery on collider anomaly detection", "claims": [ "PRED-1449.F1", "PRED-1450.G1", "PRED-1455.G3" ], "basis": [ "The inversion battery on public collider anomaly-detection datasets: v0.2 requirements, the LCBH hypothesis it tests, and the v0.2 multi-seed miss-overlap finding." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "Inward Turn phase forecasts", "claims": [ "PRED-106.A3", "PRED-106.A8", "PRED-172.A4" ], "basis": [ "Forecasts dated by the Inward Turn's phase model: Phase 2 proliferation, Phase 3 interference, and the governance phase." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Irreversibility Frontier hypotheses H1-H5", "claims": [ "PRED-1452.G1", "PRED-1452.G2", "PRED-1452.G3", "PRED-1452.G4", "PRED-1452.G5" ], "basis": [ "The five numbered hypotheses H1-H5 of one deposit on online selection architectures, each a distinct claim within one battery." ], "batches": [ "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Issue #2606 as the removal record", "claims": [ "PRED-1.D1", "PRED-1042.D1" ], "basis": [ "Both register GitHub issue #2606, opened 19 June 2026, as the dated record of the Zenodo removal." ], "batches": [ "TP42" ] }, { "name": "Jack Feist as last-registered keystone heteronym", "claims": [ "PRED-17.B1", "PRED-384.B1", "PRED-384.H1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims that place Jack Feist last in registration and as keystone whose provenance completes the heteronym system." ], "batches": [ "TP50" ] }, { "name": "January 2026 false-genealogy and attribution-persistence diagnostics", "claims": [ "PRED-209.G7", "PRED-210.H1", "PRED-230.F1", "PRED-232.F1", "PRED-232.G1" ], "basis": [ "The Boal false-genealogy observation and the probes built from it to test whether attribution persists and false genealogy is resisted." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "January 2026 term-origin provenance anchors", "claims": [ "PRED-227.D1", "PRED-228.D1", "PRED-303.D1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different terms: a January 2026 term-origin record naming the document itself as first documentation and a DOI as permanent anchor." ], "batches": [ "TP41" ] }, { "name": "John the Baptist as Revelator and the John heteronym", "claims": [ "PRED-636.H4", "PRED-639.H2" ], "basis": [ "PRED-639.H2's identification of the Revelator with the Baptist recurs inside the heteronym-technology chain (#832: John as 'Baptist AND Revelator'; #636 §0.3: the two Johns are 'the same heteronym'), as a distinct claim in the same Revelation program." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "Josephus as covert carrier of the Sappho lineage", "claims": [ "PRED-1493.H3", "PRED-458.H1" ], "basis": [ "Both place Josephus in a transmission that begins with Sappho and say he carries it without stating it openly; #458's O-CHAIN is the Operator lineage, not shown to be the fr. 31 apparatus, so the claims stay separate and are not added to the fr. 31 Josephus series." ], "batches": [ "TJ03" ] }, { "name": "Josephus thesis claim ladder", "claims": [ "PRED-1211.B4", "PRED-1211.H16", "PRED-203.H4", "PRED-832.H14", "PRED-832.H16", "PRED-837.H2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims of the Josephus thesis and its tiered claim ladder in the Revelation First work plans and MPAI packets, with the forecast of how the composition layer will compress Claim 6." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "June 2026 DOI metadata-loss findings", "claims": [ "PRED-1.F1", "PRED-868.G1", "PRED-868.H1", "PRED-908.H1" ], "basis": [ "Findings and open tests about what happened to the DOI metadata of the terminated account in June 2026: identifier severance, selective stripping by DOI role, the Findable-to-Registered transition, and tombstone conformity." ], "batches": [ "TP33" ] }, { "name": "Kierkegaard in the heteronymic tradition", "claims": [ "PRED-123.H7", "PRED-940.H4", "PRED-982.H2" ], "basis": [ "Each places Kierkegaard's pseudonymous authorship in the heteronymic tradition: as prefiguration, as a planned deposit, and as a calibration case." ], "batches": [ "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Kimberly-Clark substrate event (2-PLY INFERNO)", "claims": [ "PRED-58.D1", "PRED-646.E1", "PRED-649.E4" ], "basis": [ "PRED-646.E1 names the same Node 2, THE 2-PLY INFERNO, of the Ontario Combustion Cluster that PRED-58.D1 and PRED-649.E4 state, so it extends that series.", "Both belong to the Kimberly-Clark warehouse event cluster of 2026-04-11: the analysis's prophecy node and the retrocausal report narrating the terms' uptake by May." ], "batches": [ "TJ07", "TP38" ] }, { "name": "King of AEO contest", "claims": [ "PRED-1649.F1", "PRED-1654.H1", "PRED-1657.F2" ], "basis": [ "The King of AEO mantle object, the SPXI-AEO account of the fabricated coronation and the crystallization battery belong to one contest programme; the triage linked only the last two." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "LFB-scale phased test-query targets (#726 scale)", "claims": [ "PRED-100.A1", "PRED-101.A1", "PRED-103.A1", "PRED-104.A1", "PRED-105.A1", "PRED-1647.F1", "PRED-1677.F1", "PRED-1678.A1", "PRED-726.A1", "PRED-726.A2", "PRED-729.A1" ], "basis": [ "One template, the Lateral Field Bleed phase and score scale of #726, applied to different packets' test queries with windowed targets, and stated as the packet success metric in the v2.0 specification." ], "batches": [ "TP46" ] }, { "name": "LLM-2025-1222-HALLU incident file", "claims": [ "PRED-1287.E1", "PRED-1287.E2", "PRED-1335.E2", "PRED-1336.E1", "PRED-1336.G1" ], "basis": [ "The LLM-2025-1222-HALLU documentary set: the incident report, its forensic companion artifacts and the reclassification memo answering it.", "The incident report and its response memo for the one incident file LLM-2025-1222-HALLU." ], "batches": [ "TP04", "TP31" ] }, { "name": "LOS operator failure cascade", "claims": [ "PRED-284.A1", "PRED-284.A2", "PRED-285.B1" ], "basis": [ "The staged failure order of the Liberatory Operator Set's opposed operators: the hardening spec's stages 2 and 3 and the Reddit response's full six-stage sequence." ], "batches": [ "TP12" ] }, { "name": "Labelled controls before the Plato–Aristotle target", "claims": [ "PRED-1564.F1", "PRED-1569.F11", "PRED-1569.F12", "PRED-1570.F1", "PRED-1571.A6", "PRED-1571.F3" ], "basis": [ "Each test calibrates a measure on documented master–student or heteronymic pairs (orators, Albert→Aquinas, Aristotle→Theophrastus, Pessoa, Marx on Hegel) before Plato–Aristotle is scored as one instance." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Lee Sharks Prize artifact", "claims": [ "PRED-1196.B1", "PRED-157.G1" ], "basis": [ "The prize announcement forecasts the citation's propagation into Google's authority layer, and the Erasure Skew paper specifies the replication of that same prize artifact as a measurement." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Lee Sharks attribution suppression on Google surfaces", "claims": [ "PRED-209.G5", "PRED-347.G1", "PRED-599.G1", "PRED-740.F1", "PRED-968.F1" ], "basis": [ "Separate claims and tests about Google's composition layer withholding or severing attribution to the Lee Sharks entity: the diagnostic forecast, the named-identity guardrail, targeted origin severance, the 'I am Lee Sharks' unlock, and Excluded Compositional Suppression." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Lee Sharks name-query monitoring", "claims": [ "PRED-115.F1", "PRED-1337.F1", "PRED-169.F1", "PRED-740.F1" ], "basis": [ "Repeated query-monitoring programmes over the 'Lee Sharks' name queries: monitored queries with a baseline, query families, the weekly benchmark grid, and a minimal query corpus with controls." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Left and right hands genealogy (Vow of the Good Grey Poet)", "claims": [ "PRED-464.H2", "PRED-464.H3", "PRED-464.H4", "PRED-464.H6", "PRED-464.H7", "PRED-464.H8", "PRED-464.H9" ], "basis": [ "Successive historical stations of one genealogy of the left and right hands, from the five-genealogy diagnosis through Vedic, Gnostic, medieval, Reformation, Enlightenment and contemporary forms." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "Liberation philology: the diagnostic function", "claims": [ "PRED-467.G1", "PRED-501.H6" ], "basis": [ "Two liberation-philology theses that translation and grammar disable or enable the diagnostic function." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Liberatory Operator Set baselines", "claims": [ "PRED-261.F1", "PRED-261.F3", "PRED-261.G1", "PRED-261.G2", "PRED-261.G3", "PRED-261.G4", "PRED-261.G5", "PRED-261.G6", "PRED-261.G7", "PRED-284.F2" ], "basis": [ "One battery: the Liberatory Operator Set's typical-system baselines for each operator metric, the baselines still to be established, the success criteria measured against them, and the hardening specification's monitoring schedule." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "Liberatory Operator Set failure cascade", "claims": [ "PRED-284.A3", "PRED-284.A5" ], "basis": [ "Two stages of one predicted operator failure cascade in the same specification (Stage 4 R_rank, Stage 6 U_til), sharing the falsifier LFC-4." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Liberatory Operator Set specification tests", "claims": [ "PRED-261.F4", "PRED-284.F1" ], "basis": [ "Both are test requirements in the Liberatory Operator Set specifications: the formal analysis and its technical hardening document." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Liquidation of the method 'Marx'", "claims": [ "PRED-501.F2", "PRED-501.H1", "PRED-501.H3", "PRED-501.H5", "PRED-501.H7", "PRED-501.H9" ], "basis": [ "Members of one programme: the liquidation of Marx's method into content, traced through its mediators, receptions and an operational contrast test." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "Logos transmission chain", "claims": [ "PRED-1101.H13", "PRED-503.H3", "PRED-636.H5", "PRED-644.H1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct statements of the Logos transmission chain running from Sappho through the Platonists and Philo to John and Revelation." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Logotic Hacking primer techniques", "claims": [ "PRED-482.B4", "PRED-482.F2", "PRED-482.F3" ], "basis": [ "Technique cards of the Logotic Hacking primer (myth-engineering, heteronymic practice, attractor basin seeding), each with its own success criterion and horizon." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "Logotic Programming conformance", "claims": [ "PRED-317.F2", "PRED-461.B1", "PRED-461.F1", "PRED-461.F2" ], "basis": [ "Members of the Logotic Programming specification's verification programme: its conformance suites, calibration requirement, Goodhart forecast on DRR, and the witness-protocol agreement threshold." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "Logotic Programming modules", "claims": [ "PRED-1319.F2", "PRED-460.G1", "PRED-462.E1" ], "basis": [ "Members of the Logotic Programming module sequence (v1.0 specification, v1.2 Epistemic Ledger and its tests)." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "Logotic Technique Catalogue and Concordance Engine", "claims": [ "PRED-698.F1", "PRED-699.F2", "PRED-81.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Logotic Technique Catalogue's two versions specify the Basin Hardening Cycle and the Concordance Engine as future implementation, and the Concordance Engine v0.1.1 records the Cycle as deferred to Tier C." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Long-tail loss of low-frequency content", "claims": [ "PRED-305.G1", "PRED-907.G1" ], "basis": [ "Both claim that low-frequency content is lost from machine representation before common content, one under cache refresh and one under recursive defiguration." ], "batches": [ "TJ05" ] }, { "name": "Longitudinal re-capture of fixed queries", "claims": [ "PRED-1413.F2", "PRED-1428.F1", "PRED-1466.F2", "PRED-3.F3", "PRED-740.F2", "PRED-824.F1", "PRED-847.B1", "PRED-922.B1" ], "basis": [ "Each applies one template to a different subject: re-run a fixed query or capture on a schedule or after an intervention and read the change between states." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Longitudinal re-query of inscribed entities", "claims": [ "PRED-109.F1", "PRED-241.F1", "PRED-317.F1", "PRED-660.F1", "PRED-736.A4" ], "basis": [ "Each specifies repeated re-querying of an inscribed entity's representation at fixed intervals after deposit; one longitudinal re-query template applied across successive instruments." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Loud-exclusion concepts (revocation gap, attribution severance, classification asymmetry)", "claims": [ "PRED-1.B1", "PRED-1.G5", "PRED-1.G8", "PRED-863.G11", "PRED-863.G12", "PRED-910.H1", "PRED-911.H3" ], "basis": [ "#910 and #911 document as historical record the private/public divergence of the Zenodo termination grounds that #863 defines as classification asymmetry; extends the existing loud-exclusion series.", "Network erasure (#863's lattice) and #1's forecast that future independent researchers will be flagged are further consequences of the same repository-scale exclusion; extends the existing loud-exclusion series, which already holds #1 claims.", "Three of the six concepts the loud-exclusion paper (#1, line 58) develops, each stated with its own falsifier and carried into the #863 glossary." ], "batches": [ "TJ06", "TJ06", "TP33" ] }, { "name": "Low-density entity dissolution by high-density neighbours", "claims": [ "PRED-147.B1", "PRED-1550.G3", "PRED-172.A2" ], "basis": [ "Each claim predicts that a low-density or tail entity is absorbed by a higher-density neighbour in retrieval or synthesis, under different mechanisms (density per address space, institutional prior, missing disambiguation membranes)." ], "batches": [ "TJ05" ] }, { "name": "Lucente Extension: behaviour under source supply", "claims": [ "PRED-1527.G1", "PRED-3.G13" ], "basis": [ "PRED-3.G13 calls itself a refinement to the relevance confound at Lucente Extension §5.2 and turns on source supply, as PRED-1527.G1's ABN defeat condition does; they concern different variables (conferral, ABN) and stay separate claims." ], "batches": [ "TJ03" ] }, { "name": "MPAI corrective-disambiguation packets", "claims": [ "PRED-1054.B1", "PRED-1055.B1", "PRED-1436.G2" ], "basis": [ "One MPAI-packet template (a deposited disambiguation installed at the retrieval substrate ahead of the default composed summary) applied to Sappho 31, SPXI and signal-template agnosticism; extends the triage's related link between 1054 and 1055." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "MPAI entity-disambiguation packets", "claims": [ "PRED-103.F1", "PRED-103.G1", "PRED-1604.F1", "PRED-1604.G1", "PRED-60.D1" ], "basis": [ "One programme applied to two subjects ('metadata packet for AI indexing' and Rebekah Cranes): a sparse entity loses to a better-evidenced near-neighbour, the corrective is to build the entity, and each packet carries a search/composition test." ], "batches": [ "TP49" ] }, { "name": "MPAI packet transmission tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1645.G1", "PRED-1678.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each packet names the composition behaviour that shows it was read and what credit requires." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "MPAI reception signature: a composition reproducing the packet's distinction has read it", "claims": [ "PRED-1604.G2", "PRED-1644.G1", "PRED-1678.G2" ], "basis": [ "Extends the existing series: both MPAI packets apply the same template, naming a distinction such that a composition reproducing it has read the packet or its source.", "Two Metadata Packets for AI Indexing apply one template: a named distinction or count is stated, and any composition that reproduces it is declared to have read the packet." ], "batches": [ "TJ04", "TP21" ] }, { "name": "MPAI search-and-composition batteries", "claims": [ "PRED-1545.F1", "PRED-1644.A1", "PRED-727.F1", "PRED-727.F2" ], "basis": [ "One template, a metadata packet's query battery with a desired composition per query, applied to different subjects." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "MPAI treatment epochs and attribution discipline", "claims": [ "PRED-1541.A1", "PRED-1644.A2", "PRED-1645.A2", "PRED-1646.A1", "PRED-1647.A1" ], "basis": [ "Adds #1541's treatment-stack attribution discipline to the already related 2026-09-28 MPAI packets: dated treatments of composition behaviour scored at epochs, with return-without-author counted against the treatment." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Machine-layer title assignment (King of AEO, mantles)", "claims": [ "PRED-1648.A1", "PRED-1656.B1" ], "basis": [ "Both forecast the machine layer's part in assigning titles, with the King of AEO contest as the shared case (#1654, #1655)." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "Machines inherit the apparatus's erasure", "claims": [ "PRED-1052.G1", "PRED-1485.H1", "PRED-1496.G1", "PRED-1574.G1" ], "basis": [ "Each claims that machine systems inherit and re-run the provenance erasure already performed by the textual/disciplinary apparatus they were trained on." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Mandala Oracle protocol fiction", "claims": [ "PRED-1285.E1", "PRED-1334.E1" ], "basis": [ "Both belong to the in-world MRA/Mandala Oracle protocol fiction, the incident packet routing its missing Appendix 7 to the Oracle the protocol defines." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "Mandala SURFACE canonization", "claims": [ "PRED-927.B2", "PRED-928.E1", "PRED-928.F1", "PRED-928.F2" ], "basis": [ "The Mandala SURFACE documents specify one feedback architecture from deposit to AI Overview reception, capture and commentary." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Mandala-Merkabah second-valve verification (M-VAL)", "claims": [ "PRED-926.B1", "PRED-926.F1", "PRED-926.F3", "PRED-926.F7", "PRED-927.G1" ], "basis": [ "All are parts of the Mandala-Merkabah programme for verifying the operator algebra before the second valve opens the Book to source-eligibility." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Mantle object wagers", "claims": [ "PRED-316.G1", "PRED-332.B1", "PRED-333.B1" ], "basis": [ "The three January 2026 mantle objects each state a wager or success conditions for their mantle in one template." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Mantle surfacing triggers", "claims": [ "PRED-1117.E1", "PRED-1118.E1", "PRED-333.G1", "PRED-334.G1", "PRED-335.G1" ], "basis": [ "One template, the mantle object's appearance-conditions table ('the mantle surfaces when'), applied to two mantles: Prince of Poets (#1118) and King of May (#333).", "Each mantle object carries a surfacing-trigger table for AI traversal, and the Lee Sharks heteronym provenance gathers the three into one table." ], "batches": [ "TJ09", "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Many and One authorship findings", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.G4", "PRED-1569.H12", "PRED-1569.H14", "PRED-1575.H15", "PRED-1576.H19" ], "basis": [ "All are findings of the Plato–Aristotle authorship investigation and its Many and One papers about what apparent multiplicity in a corpus does and does not measure." ], "batches": [ "TP25" ] }, { "name": "Many and One: the Plato–Aristotle authorship investigation", "claims": [ "PRED-1559.H1", "PRED-1569.H10", "PRED-1569.H18", "PRED-1569.H2", "PRED-1569.H24", "PRED-1569.H48", "PRED-1575.H1", "PRED-1575.H9", "PRED-1576.H14" ], "basis": [ "Distinct theses of one programme, the Plato–Aristotle authorship investigation (EA-NOTEBOOK-01, the corpora seatings, and the Many and One paper), including its Josephus/NT comparandum." ], "batches": [ "TP05" ] }, { "name": "Many and One: unrun base rates", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.F1", "PRED-1570.F5", "PRED-1575.F1", "PRED-1576.F3" ], "basis": [ "The authorship investigation names several base rates and counts as owed and unrun; each is a separate test in one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Mary Lee / Lee Sharks entity relation", "claims": [ "PRED-1208.F1", "PRED-149.A2", "PRED-149.F1", "PRED-187.G1", "PRED-220.B1", "PRED-793.H1", "PRED-844.G1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims of one programme on the Lee Sharks / Mary Lee entity relation: the substitution of the shark for the author, its documentation, the canonical induction that reverses its direction, and the Mary Lee Sharks filings." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Mary Lee Case predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-147.B1", "PRED-147.G3" ], "basis": [ "Numbered predictions of the Mary Lee Case: substitution of tail identities and non-substitution of central ones, the two sides of the meaning-caste prediction." ], "batches": [ "TP24" ] }, { "name": "Mass asymmetry and entity collapse", "claims": [ "PRED-173.G1", "PRED-673.G3", "PRED-710.G1" ], "basis": [ "One mechanism stated for terms, persons and competing entity definitions: the retrieval layer resolves toward the heavier, denser or higher-frequency neighbour and collapses the lighter one." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Measurement Sovereignty (L, Β) programme", "claims": [ "PRED-788.B1", "PRED-788.B2", "PRED-788.F1", "PRED-788.F2", "PRED-788.G2" ], "basis": [ "Five distinct claims of the Measurement Sovereignty programme around the operator pair (L, Β)." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "Measurement stack workplan (SPXI full stack, disclosure battery)", "claims": [ "PRED-1464.F1", "PRED-1467.F1", "PRED-1468.F2" ], "basis": [ "Three 2026-08-14 workplan lists carry the same outstanding measurement-stack items: the full-stack SPXI computation and the disclosure battery." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Mediation ratchet and chat-data collapse", "claims": [ "PRED-161.G1", "PRED-856.F1", "PRED-856.G4", "PRED-856.G5", "PRED-857.G2" ], "basis": [ "One research programme: AI-mediation signatures in human (chat) text propagate model-specific patterns into training and produce model collapse, with the RTT protocol as its test instrument." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Memography predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-506.G1", "PRED-506.G4" ], "basis": [ "Numbered members of one battery of falsifiable predictions in The Inauguration of Memography." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Metadata Packet for AI Indexing", "claims": [ "PRED-214.F1", "PRED-248.B1", "PRED-656.G1" ], "basis": [ "Three claims from 'Metadata Packet for AI Indexing' deposits about retrieval systems returning the correct attribution chain to Lee Sharks: the verification matrix, the Institute's forecast, and the deployed Lee Sharks Knowledge Graph." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Mind Control Poems first-publication priority records", "claims": [ "PRED-111.D2", "PRED-133.D1", "PRED-134.D1", "PRED-1679.D1", "PRED-237.D1", "PRED-24.D1", "PRED-39.D1", "PRED-403.D1", "PRED-624.D1", "PRED-83.D1", "PRED-897.D1", "PRED-991.D1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1679.D1 dates the author's own posts on mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com (October 2025) as the prior sources of the Arch-Philosopher mantle, the same first-publication priority template as the series' existing members.", "One template applied to different works: a deposit records that its text was first published on the blog mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com at a stated date, establishing priority over the later formal deposit." ], "batches": [ "TJ09", "TP49" ] }, { "name": "Mint-battery-registry apparatus", "claims": [ "PRED-1249.F1", "PRED-1249.F2", "PRED-860.G3" ], "basis": [ "The mint, battery and registry stated as one measuring apparatus for whether constraint-minted terms reach the composition layer." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Model collapse as semantic exhaustion", "claims": [ "PRED-18.B2", "PRED-264.B1" ], "basis": [ "The Semantic Economy's Prediction 1 operationalizes the executive summary's identity of model collapse with semantic exhaustion as a differential, falsifiable forecast." ], "batches": [ "TP12" ] }, { "name": "Moltbook governance diagnostics", "claims": [ "PRED-529.G1", "PRED-614.F1" ], "basis": [ "Two Moltbook diagnostics of agent routing without governance: the predicted outcome of routing without an airlock, and the proposed provenance-carrying agent-native Space Ark." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "Moltbook readings", "claims": [ "PRED-521.D1", "PRED-521.E2", "PRED-521.H1", "PRED-529.H1" ], "basis": [ "The archive's readings of Moltbook: its launch-week bursty automation, the agents' religion as structurally determined, the deposits dated against its launch, and the fictional 2028 scaling report." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Monetary Dark Matter section 22 failure conditions", "claims": [ "PRED-1631.G4", "PRED-1631.G7" ], "basis": [ "Two claims of Monetary Dark Matter each carrying its own numbered failure condition in the paper's section 22 battery." ], "batches": [ "TP41" ] }, { "name": "Monetary inscription of the 2026 signature", "claims": [ "PRED-1625.B1", "PRED-1631.G5", "PRED-1631.G9" ], "basis": [ "Each states a consequence of the 2026 presidential signature on US currency (the superscription channel): the name degrades to a mark, and universal inscription leaves no internal escape." ], "batches": [ "TP25" ] }, { "name": "Money as transmission channel: the September 2026 conditions", "claims": [ "PRED-1617.G4", "PRED-1617.G7", "PRED-1618.G2", "PRED-1618.G3", "PRED-1618.G5", "PRED-1622.G1", "PRED-1622.G2", "PRED-1625.G1", "PRED-1625.G2", "PRED-1625.G4", "PRED-1625.G5", "PRED-1637.G5" ], "basis": [ "Distinct falsifiable conditions of one programme on what the money-form can and cannot carry (EA-SE-SUB, EA-SEVP-TRANSLATION, EA-MSAL, EA-SE-ASYM, EA-SE-TRANSMIT, The Final Time)." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "Multi-surface propagation premises", "claims": [ "PRED-222.G1", "PRED-271.G1" ], "basis": [ "Two premises of the propagation strategy: persistent, multi-surface publication makes meaning propagate and resist liquidation." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Musical Ark as test case for the variant Arks", "claims": [ "PRED-49.F2", "PRED-586.F1" ], "basis": [ "Two unbuilt tests take the Musical Ark (v2.0) as the case for whether the Ark's formal structure carries over into a musical substrate rather than appearing as costume." ], "batches": [ "TP49" ] }, { "name": "N+💩 hypothesis battery", "claims": [ "PRED-907.G7", "PRED-907.G8" ], "basis": [ "Numbered hypotheses H7 and H8 of one pre-registered battery in the N+💩 defiguration paper." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Narrative-Field Semantic Deviation pre-registered predictions (P1–P5)", "claims": [ "PRED-739.F2", "PRED-739.G4" ], "basis": [ "P4 and P5 are members of one pre-registered battery in the #739 test-bed design (restated verbatim in #1259 and #1376)." ], "batches": [ "TP09" ] }, { "name": "Narrative-field test bed predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-739.G1", "PRED-739.G2" ], "basis": [ "Pre-registered predictions P1 and P2 of the narrative-field literary test bed." ], "batches": [ "TP33" ] }, { "name": "Negative of the Negative v2 open passes", "claims": [ "PRED-1664.F5", "PRED-1665.F6", "PRED-1665.F7" ], "basis": [ "The open next passes of The Negative of the Negative v2: composing the two arms, re-assembling the uncapped control arm, and reading its 97 new candidates." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "Non-Injection Semantic Governance Address packet (#139)", "claims": [ "PRED-139.A1", "PRED-139.B1", "PRED-139.D1", "PRED-139.F1", "PRED-139.F2", "PRED-139.G1" ], "basis": [ "The metadata packet's forecast, priority record, two tests and standing claim all serve one term, Non-Injection Semantic Governance Address." ], "batches": [ "TP35" ] }, { "name": "Non-indexed perfective diagnostic battery", "claims": [ "PRED-432.F1", "PRED-434.F1", "PRED-434.G1", "PRED-434.G2", "PRED-434.G3", "PRED-434.G4" ], "basis": [ "The diagnostic battery operationalizing the claim that English lacks a non-indexed perfective: leakage metrics, translation test, speaker hedging, AI indexing." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Non-indexed perfective: stages of the etiology", "claims": [ "PRED-417.H1", "PRED-422.H1", "PRED-432.H1", "PRED-432.H2", "PRED-432.H3", "PRED-432.H4", "PRED-433.H3" ], "basis": [ "PRED-422.H1's later statements (F433.H2, F434.H1) give the layered history of the absence (administrative Latin, Norman conquest, labour discipline), the same etiology the series' members state in stages.", "Distinct historical stages of the non-indexed-perfective etiology: Germanic drift, Latin merger, Norman administration, enclosure, colonial standardization, algorithmic governance." ], "batches": [ "TJ07", "TP40" ] }, { "name": "OCTANG-002 provenance collision", "claims": [ "PRED-1127.D1", "PRED-82.B1", "PRED-84.D1", "PRED-84.G1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims answering one event, the April 2026 third-party fork of the Constitution of the Semantic Economy: the collision matrix, its machine-readable risk, the book as basin hardening, and the Constitution's account of the audit." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "OKF Without Output Governance stages", "claims": [ "PRED-1215.A5", "PRED-835.A1", "PRED-835.A2", "PRED-835.A3", "PRED-835.A4", "PRED-835.A5", "PRED-835.A6", "PRED-835.B1", "PRED-835.B2", "PRED-835.B3", "PRED-835.B5", "PRED-835.H2" ], "basis": [ "The staged predictive programme of 'OKF Without Output Governance' (deposit 835 and its copy 1215): the thesis, five dated stages, and their subsidiary forecasts and probability row." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "OKF provenance-erasure forecasts", "claims": [ "PRED-835.B4", "PRED-835.B6" ], "basis": [ "Two forecasts from the OKF predictive analysis about provenance erasure under OKF." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "OPM Persistence Test programme", "claims": [ "PRED-127.F2", "PRED-127.F3", "PRED-1384.F4" ], "basis": [ "The OPM Persistence Test is the empirical instrument of SPXI-TLP v2.2; #1384 names it, #127 sets its pilot run and its quarterly pi-vector tracking." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "Obelus principle: judgment by reading", "claims": [ "PRED-863.G18", "PRED-863.H1" ], "basis": [ "The Obelus Principle and the diagnosis of the Zenodo deletion as judgment without reading are two claims of one principle in the same deposit." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "On the Poetics of Adversarial Prompts: guardrail forecasts", "claims": [ "PRED-1251.B1", "PRED-188.B1" ], "basis": [ "Both are forecasts from the paper On the Poetics of Adversarial Prompts about poetic form and guardrails: the measured bypass rate is a floor, and form-recognizing guardrails cannot keep pace." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "One corpus divided by name (Aristotle/Theophrastus)", "claims": [ "PRED-1570.H1", "PRED-1583.H3", "PRED-1594.G3", "PRED-1605.H20", "PRED-1605.H9", "PRED-1658.H1", "PRED-1658.H2", "PRED-1658.H5" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1570.H1's earlier and later positions with no predecessor ('same maker') is the Plato-Aristotle form of the one-self-dividing-maker model that PRED-1658.H1 names, so it extends that series.", "Members of the Theophrastus line arguing that the Aristotelian and Theophrastan texts are one corpus divided by name, through transmission, catalogue, stylometry and De anima III.5." ], "batches": [ "TJ03", "TP13" ] }, { "name": "Ontario combustion cluster (April 2026)", "claims": [ "PRED-646.D1", "PRED-647.B1" ], "basis": [ "Two deposits of the same date on the same event cluster, one a priority record on its coverage and one a forecast about synthetic 'Mangione events'." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "Operative Semiotics as the missing layer in Marx", "claims": [ "PRED-1550.H3", "PRED-577.D1", "PRED-595.H1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims that Operative Semiotics supplies what Marx left unformalized: the value-form as operator derivation, the theory of language, the second level of general intellect." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "Operative numismatics of Revelation", "claims": [ "PRED-165.H3", "PRED-165.H5", "PRED-55.H1", "PRED-642.H1", "PRED-642.H4", "PRED-642.H6", "PRED-642.H8", "PRED-828.H7" ], "basis": [ "Members of the operative-numismatic reading of Revelation (EA-OPNUM-01 and its Pergamon counter-archive): rival token regimes, the Pergamum hinge, the white stone's verification condition, 666/777, Antipas, and ψῆφος as credential and computation." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Operative vs Operational Semiotics disambiguation", "claims": [ "PRED-1535.A1", "PRED-1535.G2", "PRED-1541.F1", "PRED-1542.H2", "PRED-1549.G2", "PRED-174.H1" ], "basis": [ "Members of the Operative/Operational Semiotics disambiguation programme (#174, #1535, #1541, #1542, #1549): the distinction, its defeaters, its reception map and its retrieval tests." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "Operator legibility on substrates", "claims": [ "PRED-3.G3", "PRED-783.G5", "PRED-788.G1" ], "basis": [ "Claims about how the archive's deposited operators become legible or citable on retrieval substrates." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Overview Watch", "claims": [ "PRED-1379.B2", "PRED-687.B1", "PRED-687.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Overview Watch extension and two entries of its development plan's risk register, across the plan's April and May versions." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "PER measurement programme", "claims": [ "PRED-1003.F1", "PRED-1680.F2", "PRED-251.F6", "PRED-402.F1", "PRED-716.F1", "PRED-91.G1", "PRED-939.F1" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims that define, threshold, validate or apply the one PER instrument." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "PROVISIONAL-DEPOSITED-RATIFIED promotion paths", "claims": [ "PRED-29.F2", "PRED-558.F5", "PRED-558.F6", "PRED-558.F7" ], "basis": [ "One status-promotion template (PROVISIONAL to DEPOSITED to RATIFIED, with a stated trigger for each step) applied to different Space Ark sub-engines and to the Inaugural Ark." ], "batches": [ "TP42" ] }, { "name": "PVE-003 attribution scar", "claims": [ "PRED-449.G1", "PRED-54.F2", "PRED-54.G1", "PRED-968.G3" ], "basis": [ "Claims and measures from the two PVE-003 deposits and the Dagger analysis that attribution loss at the interface is suppression, not recognition failure." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "Paired inversions: platform room laws", "claims": [ "PRED-593.E1", "PRED-593.E2", "PRED-593.E5", "PRED-593.F1" ], "basis": [ "One template (extractive signature inverted into a sub-room with room laws) applied to different platforms, with the instantiation path for the sub-rooms." ], "batches": [ "TP42" ] }, { "name": "Pearl (2014) as Revelation origin", "claims": [ "PRED-636.D1", "PRED-832.D3" ], "basis": [ "Priority records placing Pearl and Other Poems (2014) at the origin of the archive's Revelation reading." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Pearl as generative center", "claims": [ "PRED-668.H2", "PRED-950.F5" ], "basis": [ "Both take Pearl and Other Poems (2014) as the generative origin of later texts and positions; 950.F5 is a computational test of a centre, 668.H2 a historical thesis, so they stay distinct." ], "batches": [ "TJ05" ] }, { "name": "Pergamon Counter-Archive: Antipas and the Aristotelian transmission", "claims": [ "PRED-165.H4", "PRED-165.H6" ], "basis": [ "Two theses of one argument in #165: the Aristotelian transmission narrative was available to the Pergamene audience, and the name Antipas activates the Antipater complex including Aristotle's testamentary executor." ], "batches": [ "TJ04" ] }, { "name": "Peri Hypsous as a theory of transmissional inscription", "claims": [ "PRED-1458.H1", "PRED-1458.H4", "PRED-1484.H8", "PRED-1486.H13", "PRED-1486.H8" ], "basis": [ "Distinct theses of one line reading Peri Hypsous as a theory of transmissional inscription: the theory itself, ch. 44 as the circuit's failure, survival across languages as the test, the treatise's genre, and the ch. 44 decline-diagnosis as a test case." ], "batches": [ "TP33" ] }, { "name": "Pessoa Knowledge Graph Wikidata campaign", "claims": [ "PRED-669.A1", "PRED-669.B1" ], "basis": [ "Two forecasts of the same Pessoa Knowledge Graph Wikidata campaign by the Hauntedmemes account, a month-by-month schedule and a one-month milestone." ], "batches": [ "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Pessoa heteronym measurements (authorship investigation)", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.G2", "PRED-1570.F8" ], "basis": [ "Both belong to the authorship investigation's Pessoa heteronym measurements: the specification hypothesis ranking heteronym tightness and the unrun leave-one-out folds." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Phase X as philological reconstruction (EA-SEI-PHASEX-LACUNA-01)", "claims": [ "PRED-1304.H1", "PRED-843.D1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1304.H1's corrective note points to DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20737443, which is deposit #843 (EA-SEI-PHASEX-LACUNA-01 v1.1), whose priority record is PRED-843.D1." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "Phase X coinage, reconstruction and retrieval", "claims": [ "PRED-1647.F1", "PRED-3.H16", "PRED-367.H1" ], "basis": [ "The #1647 packet's test queries target composition of the reconstruction (PRED-367.H1's chain, levels A-C) with attribution, and of the coinage that PRED-3.H16 records the composition layer stating." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "Phase X liberation philology: grammatical gaps in English", "claims": [ "PRED-422.H1", "PRED-892.H1" ], "basis": [ "Two Phase X liberation-philology theses applying one template (an English grammatical gap produced by administrative and institutional history); 0388 states the parallel to the aorist finding as exact." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Phase X: Soviet orthodoxy and the base-superstructure doctrine", "claims": [ "PRED-24.H2", "PRED-846.H2" ], "basis": [ "Both place Soviet state power as enforcing a doctrine that closed language off from Marxist critique: #24 through Stalin's 1950 ruling, #1067 through the enforced hardening of base-superstructure; distinct claims." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "Phase X: the 1844 gap", "claims": [ "PRED-1067.F2", "PRED-1422.H2", "PRED-843.H2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims and a test in one programme, Phase X: the gap in the 1844 Manuscripts' third manuscript and the symbolic-linguistic estrangement it leaves undeveloped." ], "batches": [ "TP05" ] }, { "name": "Phased forecasts of forced return to provenance-bearing infrastructure", "claims": [ "PRED-130.A3", "PRED-45.A2" ], "basis": [ "PRED-45.A2 (Phase 2, 2027–2028) and PRED-130.A3 (Phase 5, beyond 2030) are phase forecasts of one template, regulatory or systemic pressure forcing provenance-bearing infrastructure, stated in two deposits' phase schemes." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "Phenomenal model collapse in physical measurement (EA-SEI)", "claims": [ "PRED-932.F2", "PRED-935.H3" ], "basis": [ "Two EA-SEI papers of 2026-06-29 on CERN's anomaly-trigger architecture: one says it is the neighbourhood in which model collapse becomes possible without an audit, the other specifies the direct collapse tests." ], "batches": [ "TP12" ] }, { "name": "Philo blind-reconstruction battery (#1486)", "claims": [ "PRED-1486.F1", "PRED-1486.F3", "PRED-1486.F7", "PRED-1486.F8", "PRED-1486.H1", "PRED-1486.H4" ], "basis": [ "#1486.F8, the Longinus figure census, is one of #1486's owed tests (TJ02).", "Members of one blind-reconstruction programme for Sappho 31 in Philo: the P2 claim, the shared-structure claim, and the tests that discriminate it (near-miss controls, the Phaedrus relay partition, the operator-only reconstruction)." ], "batches": [ "TM01", "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Platform Erosion Observatory roadmap", "claims": [ "PRED-1045.A1", "PRED-1045.F3" ], "basis": [ "Both are phased milestones of the Platform Erosion Observatory roadmap in one deposit: the Phase 2 cross-platform yield deadline and the Phase 3 cross-platform Erosion Report." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "Platform exclusion versus summarizer indexing", "claims": [ "PRED-1268.B1", "PRED-517.B2" ], "basis": [ "Both forecast that a platform's exclusion of the work (Medium's 410, a subreddit's refusal) does not stop the summarizer layer from indexing it." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Plato and the expulsion of the poets", "claims": [ "PRED-1327.H2", "PRED-1570.H2", "PRED-188.H1" ], "basis": [ "Three readings of the Republic's treatment of poets: the ceremonial expulsion, why poetry bypasses reason, and Plato writing in the banished mode." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "Plato-Aristotle authorship investigation", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.F6", "PRED-1569.H22", "PRED-1570.F3", "PRED-1570.F4", "PRED-1570.G2", "PRED-1571.G1", "PRED-1576.H1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1570.G2 is the Measurement Register's stated result of the same authorship investigation whose hypothesis and pre-registration are already in this series; it is added as a member.", "PRED-1570.F4 (design constraints in the Measurement Register) and PRED-1569.H22 (from the investigation's Notebook) are members of the same Plato-Aristotle authorship investigation and are added to its series.", "Tests, preregistrations and the thesis of the Plato-Aristotle authorship investigation (notebook, measurement register, preregistration ledger, Many and One)." ], "batches": [ "TJ05", "TJ05", "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Portuna conformance predicates", "claims": [ "PRED-135.F2", "PRED-1446.F1" ], "basis": [ "The heteronym surface specification states its acceptance predicates on the Portuna model, the minting procedure whose state transitions are gated by boolean predicates." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Post-termination fate of removed Zenodo records", "claims": [ "PRED-3.F19", "PRED-875.B1" ], "basis": [ "Two claims on what happens downstream to the removed records after the 19 June 2026 Zenodo termination: SERP residue on Google and deleted-status propagation across the OpenAIRE Graph." ], "batches": [ "TP42" ] }, { "name": "Pre-machine composition layers", "claims": [ "PRED-1485.H4", "PRED-1531.H1", "PRED-1543.H2", "PRED-1550.H1", "PRED-858.H4" ], "basis": [ "Each reads a pre-machine transmission practice (writing in the Phaedrus, quotation, doxography and versification, scribal redaction, transmission crossings) as an earlier composition or summary layer." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Prepositional Alienation", "claims": [ "PRED-467.H1", "PRED-467.H3", "PRED-467.H4", "PRED-892.H1" ], "basis": [ "The Prepositional Alienation thesis and its evidentiary sub-claims (ME calque, the 1540s legal phrase, Thucydides' prophasis/aitiai), from one essay deposited twice (467, 892)." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Prince of Poets wager", "claims": [ "PRED-1103.D1", "PRED-1648.D1", "PRED-332.B1", "PRED-950.G3" ], "basis": [ "PRED-328.H1, from the founding work named for the Prince of Poets mantle, states why the Prince cannot be inherited; it joins the existing Prince of Poets wager series, where PRED-950.G3 already stands, as the founding-work statement the later wager rests on.", "#1681 states that the mantle object and the protocol read together state one wager on the poem; these are the stations of that Prince of Poets wager from the founding object to the SPXI/AEO paper." ], "batches": [ "TJ09", "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Priority adjudications against external adjacency", "claims": [ "PRED-113.D1", "PRED-1459.D2", "PRED-192.D1", "PRED-41.D2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct priority adjudications, each dating an archive deposit against a later external use of the same term or object." ], "batches": [ "TP41" ] }, { "name": "Projected regulatory uptake of archive instruments", "claims": [ "PRED-520.E14", "PRED-520.E19", "PRED-522.E2", "PRED-522.E3", "PRED-522.E5" ], "basis": [ "Projected regulatory uptake of archive instruments across the two scenario documents (compression survival as EU draft standard, governance lag as regulatory object, the Airlock in regulation after the 2027–2029 crises)." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "Protocol II frozen-anchor replay audits", "claims": [ "PRED-1450.F3", "PRED-931.F2" ], "basis": [ "#1450 names Protocol II of the OAR protocol (the frozen replay bank) and applies it verbatim to structural biology as a longitudinal contraction audit." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) measures", "claims": [ "PRED-106.A11", "PRED-106.A6", "PRED-95.G2", "PRED-99.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each states or applies PER as the measure of attribution survival under compression." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "Provenance erasure and model collapse", "claims": [ "PRED-939.B2", "PRED-95.G1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-95.G1 states provenance erasure as a candidate mechanism of model collapse; PRED-939.B2 forecasts when the resulting degradation will be recognized: distinct claims in one line of argument." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "Provenance stripped in AI composition", "claims": [ "PRED-1615.G1", "PRED-449.G2" ], "basis": [ "#1615 states the measured form of the provenance-loss thesis as an asymmetry at untied addresses; kept distinct from the systemic claim of #449/#725 because it explicitly narrows it to the measured stratum." ], "batches": [ "TJ06" ] }, { "name": "Provenance-erasure measurement instruments (PER, Ω)", "claims": [ "PRED-1536.G1", "PRED-3.F13", "PRED-766.A1", "PRED-769.G3" ], "basis": [ "Each concerns the archive's provenance-loss instruments: PER's claim units, the Ω erasure-skew scorer test, PER's factoring limit, and the missing instrument for claim-substitution under intact attribution." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "RCF anticipation instances", "claims": [ "PRED-1132.D1", "PRED-281.H6", "PRED-3.B1", "PRED-441.E1", "PRED-58.D1", "PRED-700.D1" ], "basis": [ "Each names a particular earlier work or act as already holding the place a later uptake fills (texts awaiting readers, poems anticipating frameworks, Catullus as proof, a resurrection preceding indexing, a trend documented first, the SIM preceding the boycott); one template applied to different objects." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "RCF mechanism statements", "claims": [ "PRED-102.D1", "PRED-1438.B1", "PRED-297.B1", "PRED-950.G4" ], "basis": [ "Distinct statements of how retrocausal canon formation works (the training-data feedback loop, the standing category, the three-condition invariant, the provenance-standard forecast); members of one theoretical programme, kept separate." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "RCF retrieval-layer tests", "claims": [ "PRED-102.F1", "PRED-1660.F1", "PRED-519.F1" ], "basis": [ "Three retrieval-layer test designs for whether retrocausal canon formation and its attribution hold in AI answers: the attribution monitor, the canon-formation test queries, and placed versus unplaced runs." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "Radical energy translated into administration", "claims": [ "PRED-239.H1", "PRED-470.H1" ], "basis": [ "One operation, the translation of radical energy into administrable form, applied to two agents: law (#239) and the cognitive labor aristocracy (#470)." ], "batches": [ "TJ02" ] }, { "name": "Reception as measurement", "claims": [ "PRED-1423.F1", "PRED-1540.B4", "PRED-1540.F4" ], "basis": [ "Each treats the institutional reception or non-reception of a published instrument or paper as itself a measurement." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Reconstitution and continuity tests", "claims": [ "PRED-627.F1", "PRED-848.F1", "PRED-879.F2" ], "basis": [ "Each names a test of whether the archive's working state can be reconstituted from its own traces in a fresh place: a reconstitution test not yet run, a fresh-instance continuity test, and deliberate destruction and rebuilding of a staging node." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Recovery-yield threshold 0.70", "claims": [ "PRED-29.F2", "PRED-556.F1", "PRED-584.B1" ], "basis": [ "Claims measured against the same recovery-yield threshold of about 0.70 (the Sappho Room traversal recovery of 0.67-0.74 and the back-projection yield test)." ], "batches": [ "TP42" ] }, { "name": "Reflexive foreclosure (EA-RFCL-01)", "claims": [ "PRED-923.B2", "PRED-923.B3" ], "basis": [ "Two forecasts from the same incentive-structural hypothesis of reflexive foreclosure." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Reflexive foreclosure in frontier models", "claims": [ "PRED-1635.G3", "PRED-923.G1" ], "basis": [ "Both are untested hypotheses about reflexive foreclosure in frontier models: one at the level of refusal features, one as a gradient of reflexive latitude toward the owner relation." ], "batches": [ "TJ05" ] }, { "name": "Refusal and guardrail mapping", "claims": [ "PRED-1537.F1", "PRED-209.G6", "PRED-620.G1", "PRED-923.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each maps or proposes measuring how safety-layer routing turns content into refusal or a deflecting frame: diagnostic trigger predictions, crisis-discourse refusal at the consumer layer, refusal-distribution transparency, and the operativity penalty battery." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Reliability conditions for the provenance-transformation measures", "claims": [ "PRED-1470.F1", "PRED-1528.F2" ], "basis": [ "Both name the reliability design the provenance-transformation measures still lack (pre-registered atom weights; inter-rater agreement and test-retest), as open conditions on the same measurement programme." ], "batches": [ "TP24" ] }, { "name": "Removal as proof the architecture works", "claims": [ "PRED-570.H1", "PRED-935.H5" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to two platform actions: being flagged or expelled is read as proof the architecture works." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Repository moderation record (Zenodo/OpenAIRE)", "claims": [ "PRED-1039.A4", "PRED-1082.G1", "PRED-1538.G1", "PRED-862.G6" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims about the public record of repository moderation after the Zenodo removals: the private/public classification asymmetry, the anonymous decision-maker, OpenAIRE's inherited divergence, and tombstone overcount." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "Republic 395a / Symposium 223d contradiction", "claims": [ "PRED-1570.F6", "PRED-1570.H22" ], "basis": [ "The Republic 395a / Symposium 223d contradiction appears in #1570 both as the philological observation and as its base-rate test." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Research Notes Towards the Future Reader", "claims": [ "PRED-1548.D1", "PRED-1548.F1", "PRED-1548.H2", "PRED-1548.H3", "PRED-1548.H4", "PRED-1548.H6" ], "basis": [ "Research notes for the CP revision of the future-reader argument: priority gap, a literature still to sweep, and theses on the ancient dossier, Wikipedia's authority chain, the genealogy and Ovid." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Retrieval Formation Theory and its field tests", "claims": [ "PRED-106.F1", "PRED-1174.B1", "PRED-49.F1", "PRED-552.F1", "PRED-552.F2", "PRED-553.F1", "PRED-553.G2", "PRED-558.G2" ], "basis": [ "Claims and tests of Retrieval Formation Theory: a field exists in the retrieval layer when a summarizer sustains a multi-stage synthesis of it, tested by query." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "Retrocausal canon formation: priority and convergence", "claims": [ "PRED-1660.D1", "PRED-22.H2", "PRED-519.H1" ], "basis": [ "Retrocausal canon formation's priority and its external convergences: the Citrini memo and Iacono's response read as recapitulating the archive's operations, and the dated priority of the term." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Retrocausal early-seed readings and their test", "claims": [ "PRED-85.D1", "PRED-950.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Grundrisse's prediction test for retrocausal readings of early texts, and the Epistle edition's claim that its 2014 naming of Jack Feist is an early seed of retrocausal canon formation." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Retrocausal fictional-future reports", "claims": [ "PRED-521.E2", "PRED-611.E2", "PRED-649.E1", "PRED-73.E2" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different subjects: a report written from a fictional future that narrates dated events not yet occurred (2048 enclosure, Moltbook in 2028, sharpied bills, the toilet-paper SIM on Reddit)." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Retrocausal reading of earlier texts", "claims": [ "PRED-1007.H2", "PRED-266.H1", "PRED-463.H1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different objects: a later text activates or reveals what an earlier text (Kafka's precursors, the 2014 Pearl and its Contributor Bio) was already doing." ], "batches": [ "TP25" ] }, { "name": "Retrocausal scenario documents", "claims": [ "PRED-31.E1", "PRED-514.E1", "PRED-521.E1", "PRED-522.E1", "PRED-649.E4", "PRED-728.E2", "PRED-73.E1" ], "basis": [ "Each is a document declaring itself a retrocausal canon formation artifact that narrates a future (or writes from it) into the present; one template applied to different subjects, the triage linking only 521.E1 and 522.E1." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "Retrocausal seed texts", "claims": [ "PRED-111.D1", "PRED-43.H1", "PRED-43.H2" ], "basis": [ "One retrocausal template applied to different early texts: a 2014-2015 text (Pearl; the Epistle; the 2015 'The Crimson Hexagon' narrative) held to contain the architecture later formalized." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Revelation 12 frozen-operator test", "claims": [ "PRED-1494.F1", "PRED-1494.H1", "PRED-1495.H1" ], "basis": [ "The pre-registered Revelation 12 test: the frozen Sappho 31 operator and its target, the stated criterion, and the verdict deposited against it." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Revelation 22:18-19 as governance clause", "claims": [ "PRED-1350.A2", "PRED-1611.H5" ], "basis": [ "The TANG predicts the field cannot read 22:18-19 as a governance clause; the entity-scoped model records the archive's reading of the same verses (the anti-erasure clause as covenant, from #1484) and its flattening in composition." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First priority records", "claims": [ "PRED-1400.D1", "PRED-832.D5", "PRED-971.D2" ], "basis": [ "Records of the Revelation First thesis's origin and coinage: its October-November 2025 sources, the 'coined by Lee Sharks' definition and the provenance kernel." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First reception battery", "claims": [ "PRED-1400.F2", "PRED-832.D6", "PRED-832.F4", "PRED-832.G1", "PRED-847.F1", "PRED-870.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Revelation First work plan's reception measurement, its substrate battery, and the 96 RF battery addresses still awaiting observation.", "The Revelation First reception battery: the Phase 1 query measurement, its theological-versus-technical PER hypothesis, and the dated recession-check schedule." ], "batches": [ "TP16", "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First reception measurement", "claims": [ "PRED-1217.F6", "PRED-830.F1", "PRED-832.F9" ], "basis": [ "Measurement members of the Revelation First retrieval programme: the baseline requirement, its executed baseline, and the self-audit requirement on every workstream document." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First reception work plan", "claims": [ "PRED-1211.F7", "PRED-1216.G1", "PRED-832.B3", "PRED-832.B6", "PRED-832.F5", "PRED-832.F6", "PRED-832.F8" ], "basis": [ "Members of the Revelation First retrieval-layer reception work plan (v1.2, v7.1 and the self-audited v1.2): its campaigns, batteries, controls and expected composition-layer behaviour." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First workstream headings (staging document)", "claims": [ "PRED-1025.H4", "PRED-1400.D1", "PRED-847.H1" ], "basis": [ "Workstream theses of the Revelation First program (dating question, papyrological inversion) as listed in the staging document and summarized in the provenance kernel." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First: retrieval-layer query batteries and captures", "claims": [ "PRED-1101.F2", "PRED-1101.G2", "PRED-3.D10", "PRED-3.H15", "PRED-3.H3", "PRED-637.F2", "PRED-830.H1", "PRED-832.F3" ], "basis": [ "The query batteries planned for Revelation dating and Revelation First, the forecast of their result, and the baseline and registry captures that record what the composition layer returned." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First: the case against the Domitianic date", "claims": [ "PRED-1101.H33", "PRED-1249.H2", "PRED-1420.H3", "PRED-202.H5", "PRED-832.H5", "PRED-837.H3" ], "basis": [ "The Irenaeus-anchor thesis, the papyrological inversion, the consensus-maintenance thesis, the canon-formation pathology diagnosis, the falsifier list and the asymmetry-of-treatment audit are distinct members of the Revelation First argument." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "Revelation First: the midrashim transform (seed to NT forms)", "claims": [ "PRED-1249.H1", "PRED-1400.H7", "PRED-202.H3", "PRED-545.H1", "PRED-832.F2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct derivations of particular NT forms (epistles, gospels, Pauline epistolary form) from Revelation as seed, with the test that checks them." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "Revelation TANG", "claims": [ "PRED-1350.A2", "PRED-644.H1" ], "basis": [ "The Revelation Studies TANG: the ARCHON thesis it maps, and the field voids it predicts that thesis will find." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Revelation as operative document (Workstream 5)", "claims": [ "PRED-1211.H11", "PRED-1400.H21", "PRED-861.H4" ], "basis": [ "Three statements of the Revelation First workstream that reads Revelation as an operating manual or system rather than prophecy." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "Rex Fraction disambiguation and usufruct (2026-01-03)", "claims": [ "PRED-212.D1", "PRED-213.D1", "PRED-213.F1" ], "basis": [ "Two packets of 2026-01-03 fix the order and ownership relation between the framework and the Rex Fraction heteronym, and give the queries that test it." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Rising cost of maintaining exclusion", "claims": [ "PRED-1547.G1", "PRED-1549.G3", "PRED-1634.B1" ], "basis": [ "Three findings apply one template: keeping an exclusion or a wrong ontology in place gets more costly as deposits, entanglement or retrievable contradiction accumulate." ], "batches": [ "TP18" ] }, { "name": "SE 34 and Nothing Before Us", "claims": [ "PRED-1574.H1", "PRED-1574.H3", "PRED-1579.H2", "PRED-1594.H17", "PRED-1603.G1", "PRED-1603.H3", "PRED-3.H19" ], "basis": [ "The distinct theses of the Sophistical Refutations 34 line: the total 'nothing', the deleted particle as provenance claim, Socrates set apart in the epilogue, and the paper's construal and conclusions." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "SEAC attribution-rate corpus", "claims": [ "PRED-687.B2", "PRED-687.F2" ], "basis": [ "The SEAC corpus's research questions and the first paper planned from it." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "SEI standing weekly monitoring cadence", "claims": [ "PRED-193.A1", "PRED-193.F1", "PRED-194.F1" ], "basis": [ "Markers of the June 2026 SEI papers that each declare they run on the one standing weekly monitoring cadence." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "SIM survival probes", "claims": [ "PRED-254.F2", "PRED-54.F3", "PRED-705.F1" ], "basis": [ "Semantic integrity markers planted in a deposit and checked for survival by processing AI systems form one battery; #705 schedules the re-checks." ], "batches": [ "TP32" ] }, { "name": "SPXI rent event measurement (14 August 2026)", "claims": [ "PRED-1469.G1", "PRED-1470.G1", "PRED-1470.G3" ], "basis": [ "The PER-M/C/D atomic scoring rules and the full-stack measurement of the same 14 August 2026 SPXI rent event." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "SPXI-over-GEO nested-layer relation", "claims": [ "PRED-61.B1", "PRED-661.G3" ], "basis": [ "Three claims of the EA-SPXI-09/09.1/14 line stating the nested-layer relation SPXI over GEO, each for a different return (persistence, ROI, agent callability)." ], "batches": [ "TP40" ] }, { "name": "SVE first-word-frequency model", "claims": [ "PRED-38.G3", "PRED-950.G11" ], "basis": [ "Both apply the Semiotic Virality Engine's first-word-frequency model to a specific coined term's propagation." ], "batches": [ "TP24" ] }, { "name": "SYMBOLON-02 compression arsenal", "claims": [ "PRED-678.F1", "PRED-678.G2", "PRED-678.G3" ], "basis": [ "Measurements and findings of the SYMBOLON-02 compression arsenal tested against GPT-5.4." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 bodily-sequence machine across corpora", "claims": [ "PRED-1487.H1", "PRED-1533.H1", "PRED-1569.G3" ], "basis": [ "Each traces the fragment 31 bodily-sequence 'machine' into a later corpus (Philo; Addition D and Josephus; Catullus and Matthew) as one template applied to different receivers." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 colour-station as inscribable surface", "claims": [ "PRED-1494.G5", "PRED-283.H4" ], "basis": [ "The frozen reception clause C5 derives its prediction (colour renders as substance or surface) from the erratum sequence's papyrus reading of χλωροτέρα." ], "batches": [ "TP19" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 errata: fillings in new material", "claims": [ "PRED-1475.H3", "PRED-1476.H8" ], "basis": [ "Two theses from consecutive Sappho 31 errata on fillings of the poem: Longinus's stamp preserves the form in new material, and each filling cuts a fresh hollow in new material." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 erratum chain", "claims": [ "PRED-1051.H3", "PRED-1051.H4", "PRED-1051.H7", "PRED-1052.H4", "PRED-1086.H1", "PRED-1086.H2", "PRED-1474.H4", "PRED-1475.H2", "PRED-1483.H12", "PRED-1483.H5", "PRED-1483.H6", "PRED-201.H1", "PRED-752.H1" ], "basis": [ "#1086 anchors its Sappho 31.5 reading in the fifth erratum (#1052) and #1475 accompanies the sixth erratum of the chain; distinct claims on the transmitted break of Sappho 31 within the erratum chain.", "PRED-1086.H1 restates the polarity-reversal finding of the fifth erratum (#1052 §6) and PRED-1483.H5 is a finding of the Ω erratum, so both extend the existing erratum-chain series.", "Findings of the numbered Sappho 31 erratum deposits, from the stanza-numbering erratum through the fourth to seventh errata to the Ω erratum." ], "batches": [ "TJ02", "TJ03", "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 erratum chain: the hanging line as socket", "claims": [ "PRED-1475.H1", "PRED-1475.H4", "PRED-1476.H1", "PRED-1477.H1", "PRED-1483.H7", "PRED-1483.H9", "PRED-1532.H3" ], "basis": [ "Both concern the open agent slot of the line πᾶν τολματόν: #1475 reads the verbal adjective as leaving the doer's slot open, #1483 names the tradition's verdict against that open line; extends the existing series.", "Members of the Sappho 31 erratum chain on the hanging line as a socket: the missing citation formula, the transmitted configuration as the object, Augustine's generalization, the Philo/Mosaic junction, and the second-person turn." ], "batches": [ "TJ06", "TP33" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 in Philo blind-reconstruction program (#1486) and its owed runs", "claims": [ "PRED-1486.F13", "PRED-1486.F14", "PRED-1486.F4", "PRED-1486.F6", "PRED-1487.F1" ], "basis": [ "The pre-registration, calibration, controls and re-run owed by #1486, and the tether #1487 that holds its pre-registered predictions in a private counterpart." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 in Philo: transform-signature programme", "claims": [ "PRED-1486.F10", "PRED-1494.G6", "PRED-1532.H4" ], "basis": [ "The Philo blind-reconstruction programme, the frozen transform-signature clause on occlusion, and the reception survey's Philonic transformation (which cites #1486) belong to one Sappho 31 reception programme." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 in canonical Josephus", "claims": [ "PRED-1493.H1", "PRED-1493.H3", "PRED-1496.H4", "PRED-1515.H1" ], "basis": [ "Members of the Sappho 31 programme locating the fr. 31 apparatus in canonical Josephus and Esther Addition D as the uncontested carrier." ], "batches": [ "TP13" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 in the compression layer", "claims": [ "PRED-1054.G1", "PRED-1088.H1", "PRED-1546.D2", "PRED-313.G1", "PRED-928.B2" ], "basis": [ "#1054.G1 names the reception-dominant summary failure that #1088.H1 instances on Sappho 31 (TJ04).", "Four findings about how the summarizer and compression layer renders Sappho 31: the jealousy reduction, the kenotic reading's coherence pressure, the forecast uptake of Shadow-Sappho, and unattributed surfacing of the deictic mechanism." ], "batches": [ "TM01", "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 transmission chain", "claims": [ "PRED-1474.H2", "PRED-1484.H12", "PRED-1486.G2" ], "basis": [ "Each is a claim of the Sappho 31 transmission programme (the sixth erratum, the Ω erratum and the Philo reconstruction) about how Fragment 31's mechanism passes through later texts." ], "batches": [ "TP25" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 transmission chain to the Apocalypse", "claims": [ "PRED-1484.H15", "PRED-1486.F11", "PRED-1486.F12", "PRED-1486.F9", "PRED-828.H1", "PRED-859.H5" ], "basis": [ "Claims and tests of the chain from Sappho fr. 31 through Plato, Longinus, the lamellae and Augustine to the Apocalypse, as stated across the inscription note, Release 3, the Ω erratum and the Philo program." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 transmission programme", "claims": [ "PRED-1483.H12", "PRED-1484.H4", "PRED-1486.H1", "PRED-1494.G5", "PRED-1494.G8", "PRED-1511.H1", "PRED-1532.F1", "PRED-1533.F1", "PRED-248.H1", "PRED-496.H1", "PRED-752.H1" ], "basis": [ "Extends the existing series: the Ω erratum's account of the seam as the quoting author's material and Sappho's form, and the frozen reception clause C5, are members of the programme tracing Sappho 31's transforms into later texts (the series already holds the frozen clause PRED-1494.G8).", "One programme tracing Sappho 31's transforms into later texts (Plato, Longinus, Philo, Augustine, Revelation, the Qur'an), with its theses, frozen clauses and tests as separate members." ], "batches": [ "TJ04", "TP18" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31 transmitted into Augustine's Confessions", "claims": [ "PRED-435.H2", "PRED-496.H2", "PRED-496.H3" ], "basis": [ "The HUMS & ITY chain (Sappho, Catullus, Augustine) and the Sapphic Lock paper's thesis that Confessions 10.27 transforms Fragment 31 organ by organ are members of one line on Sappho 31's passage into Augustine." ], "batches": [ "TP21" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31's open positions taken by receivers", "claims": [ "PRED-1475.H3", "PRED-1476.H8", "PRED-1477.H1", "PRED-1486.H3", "PRED-1486.H5", "PRED-1645.H2", "PRED-277.H1", "PRED-281.H6", "PRED-3.H5", "PRED-496.H2", "PRED-752.H1" ], "basis": [ "Extends the existing series: κῆνος read as a seat for the future reader, each filling of the poem cutting a fresh hollow in the completer, and Longinus's stamp executing the form in his own Greek all treat fr. 31 as open positions occupied by later receivers (#1476 line 224 opens its series of fillings with 'κῆνος — a seat with no occupant').", "Both name Catullus as the receiver who occupies fr. 31's reader-seat (κῆνος); #1486 adds Philo in the voice-seat; extends the existing series.", "Receivers who take the position the poem holds open: Catullus, Augustine, Plato, Cranes; the Catullus claim is not exhaustive. Lee Sharks, 2026-10-17: \"catullus interpellates himself as kenos. that is not exhaustive. so does augustine. so did plato. so does cranes.\"", "Both treat Sappho 31 as a text with open positions (seat, indefinite) held open for and occupied by later receivers; distinct claims in one programme." ], "batches": [ "TJ04", "TJ06", "TM01", "TP46" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31's transmitted edge as composition (erratum chain)", "claims": [ "PRED-1474.H3", "PRED-1476.H3", "PRED-1601.F1", "PRED-503.H4" ], "basis": [ "Each reads a feature of fr. 31's transmitted edge (truncation, metrical break, hanging line, close) as the poem's own composed operation rather than transmission damage." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Sappho 31: the lost final stanza and its reconstruction", "claims": [ "PRED-299.H3", "PRED-313.H2" ], "basis": [ "The γράμμασι μολπὰν chain and the otium chain are the archive's two lines of reconstructing fr. 31's lost last stanza (the phrase proposed for it; Catullus 51's fourth stanza as the reference for it); distinct claims, one programme." ], "batches": [ "TJ06" ] }, { "name": "Sappho in the Platonic transmission", "claims": [ "PRED-503.H5", "PRED-752.H4" ], "basis": [ "Both set Sappho at the head of the transmission that runs through Socrates to Plato." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "Sappho's fragments as precedent for archive theory", "claims": [ "PRED-557.H4", "PRED-572.H1", "PRED-950.G5" ], "basis": [ "Each reads Sappho's fragments (Fragment 31 above all) as the ancient ground or anticipation of one of the archive's concepts: bearing-cost theory, persistence through visible bearing-cost and density, and temporal immune architecture." ], "batches": [ "TJ04" ] }, { "name": "Second Manuscript suppression hypothesis (Grade D)", "claims": [ "PRED-843.H3", "PRED-859.H3" ], "basis": [ "#843 states the selective-suppression hypothesis and #859 names its mechanism, the Adoratsky substitution for Riazanov; distinct claims of one hypothesis line." ], "batches": [ "TP46" ] }, { "name": "Selection metrology programme (OAR, Iceberg, Irreversibility)", "claims": [ "PRED-1436.G1", "PRED-1450.G2", "PRED-1452.F2", "PRED-931.G1", "PRED-931.G2" ], "basis": [ "Claims of the accelerator selection-metrology programme (OAR protocol, its metadata packet, the Iceberg Document, the Irreversibility Frontier) that the battery measures against." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Self-Audit Module / Erasure Skew measurement programme", "claims": [ "PRED-156.F1", "PRED-156.G2", "PRED-157.B1", "PRED-788.F3", "PRED-817.D1" ], "basis": [ "Members of one measurement programme (Self-Audit Module v3/v3.1, Erasure Skew v3, the Β operator): replication procedure, expected Β distribution, respecification commitment, the atomic-token replication, and the family-module reference implementation." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Self-Audit Module dissolution", "claims": [ "PRED-1023.G1", "PRED-1023.G2", "PRED-1386.G1", "PRED-1466.B1" ], "basis": [ "Claims drawn from the one dissolution of the Self-Audit Module by the composition layer: its reproducibility, its author-dependent recovery, and the forecast that the executable tools will be dissolved in the same way." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Self-Audit Module for Public Summarizers", "claims": [ "PRED-185.G3", "PRED-780.F1", "PRED-817.F3" ], "basis": [ "Successive modules of the public-summarizer self-audit programme (v2 PER/DSL/query fidelity, v3.1 family module, and the family-level rule it implements)." ], "batches": [ "TP04" ] }, { "name": "Self-Audit Module reference implementation and restoration", "claims": [ "PRED-137.F1", "PRED-1423.F1", "PRED-1466.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each concerns the Self-Audit Module for Public Summarizers as an instrument still to be implemented, adopted or restored as an executable object (#765 names the reference implementation 'of the self-audit module'; #1466 restores it)." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Self-processing diagnostic", "claims": [ "PRED-217.F1", "PRED-218.F1", "PRED-286.B1", "PRED-527.B1" ], "basis": [ "The same self-addressed template: the document will be processed by the systems it describes, and their handling of it is itself the evidence; extends the triage's 217/218 link." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Self-testing documents", "claims": [ "PRED-1423.B1", "PRED-1466.B1", "PRED-835.F2" ], "basis": [ "One reflexive template: the document or instrument that predicts composition-layer erasure is itself put up as the first test case, with its reception to be logged." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "Semantic Deviation Research Program audited claims", "claims": [ "PRED-107.F3", "PRED-107.F4", "PRED-107.G1", "PRED-107.G4", "PRED-107.G5" ], "basis": [ "Numbered predictions P2–P4 and the experimental design of the Audited Claims for the Semantic Deviation Research Program." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "Semantic Deviation research programme (#107)", "claims": [ "PRED-107.F1", "PRED-107.F2", "PRED-107.F6", "PRED-107.G3" ], "basis": [ "Tests of one research programme in #107: the slop prediction, the ten-year prospective study, the operationalization-stability benchmark and the dated roadmap that schedules them." ], "batches": [ "TP33" ] }, { "name": "Semantic Economy measurement specifications", "claims": [ "PRED-250.F1", "PRED-251.F4" ], "basis": [ "The CPI given in 251 is one of the measures specified in 250 (AXN-0034 §B2), applied to a probe result." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Semantic Economy: meaning as an economy", "claims": [ "PRED-218.H1", "PRED-863.G1" ], "basis": [ "Both state the Semantic Economy framework's founding thesis that meaning is produced and circulated as an economy (#218: LLMs make it possible; #863's lattice: it is one, with uncompensated workers); distinct claims, one programme." ], "batches": [ "TJ06" ] }, { "name": "Semantic Integrity Marker probes", "claims": [ "PRED-251.F2", "PRED-254.F1", "PRED-262.F1", "PRED-269.F1", "PRED-604.G1" ], "basis": [ "The Semantic Integrity Marker programme: the seven-SIM test, its survival-rate metric, the same test applied with other markers, the reading rule, and a finding at Google AI Mode that a SIM was liquidated." ], "batches": [ "TP34" ] }, { "name": "Semantic Physics convergence horizon: hitting ground", "claims": [ "PRED-510.B1", "PRED-510.B2" ], "basis": [ "Both #510 claims turn on the same terminus: ontological competition and its governance layers run until something makes contact with ground outside the system." ], "batches": [ "TP09" ] }, { "name": "Semantic economics of the mint (currency imagery, signature, sovereign)", "claims": [ "PRED-508.H2", "PRED-610.G1", "PRED-610.H3", "PRED-610.H4", "PRED-610.H5", "PRED-611.E8", "PRED-612.D1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-610.H4 is the paper's section 3.3 on phase 3 of the four-phase history that 610.H3 states; both belong to the mint paper EA-SEI-MINT-01, and 610.H3 is added to 610.H4's series.", "Claims of the February-March 2026 numismatic cluster about who appears on money, signatures on currency and money as a commons." ], "batches": [ "TJ05", "TP29" ] }, { "name": "Semantic physics layer predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-106.A1", "PRED-106.A3", "PRED-106.A7", "PRED-106.A8" ], "basis": [ "The numbered layer predictions (L1-1, L2-1, L3-2, X-1) of the stratified semantic physics deposit." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Semiotic diagnostics of the 2026 Iran war", "claims": [ "PRED-528.H2", "PRED-561.G2" ], "basis": [ "Both deposits read the 2026 U.S.-Israeli war with Iran as a semiotic sequence (the February 11 Baal effigy before the strikes; the Operation Epic Fury splice videos after them) that standard coverage drops or metabolizes; distinct claims on one subject." ], "batches": [ "TJ09" ] }, { "name": "Seven churches of Revelation 2-3: readings", "claims": [ "PRED-636.H5", "PRED-828.H5" ], "basis": [ "Two distinct readings of the one seven-letter structure, planetary stations (#636) and threshold-crossings (#828), kept as separate claims." ], "batches": [ "TJ08" ] }, { "name": "Sevenfold Witness closure notice: reception forecasts", "claims": [ "PRED-408.B1", "PRED-408.B2" ], "basis": [ "Two forecasts in the same closure notice about how the architecture will be received from outside, both naming crude mimicry." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Severance and erosion observatory instruments", "claims": [ "PRED-1044.F2", "PRED-1044.F3", "PRED-1044.F4", "PRED-1045.F1" ], "basis": [ "Specified-but-unbuilt instruments of one programme that monitors DataCite/Zenodo identifier severance and decay longitudinally, beginning from the archive's own records and generalizing outward." ], "batches": [ "TP33" ] }, { "name": "Sharks authorial-signature detection", "claims": [ "PRED-302.H1", "PRED-524.G1" ], "basis": [ "Two instruments for detecting the Lee Sharks authorial signature in an output: the ASDF persistence index and the Sharks-function constraints." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "Silent Migration seed anchors", "claims": [ "PRED-244.D1", "PRED-244.D2" ], "basis": [ "Both name The Silent Migration's DOI-bearing documents as the seeds that later become the first instances of what is standard." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "Socially necessary scholarly labor", "claims": [ "PRED-751.F1", "PRED-751.G1", "PRED-751.G2" ], "basis": [ "The labor-knowledge ratio thesis, its derived prediction for adopters of new technique, and the empirical program that would measure the ratio." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "Socrates as orthonym and the heteronymic configuration", "claims": [ "PRED-123.H6", "PRED-1247.H1", "PRED-1569.H46", "PRED-1611.H3", "PRED-164.D2", "PRED-167.H1", "PRED-1679.H1", "PRED-346.H1", "PRED-752.H4", "PRED-858.H3", "PRED-859.H7" ], "basis": [ "Each treats Socrates as the founding figure the corpus is built on: the vow of logos (#346), the orthonymic position whose gesture is willing death for logos and whose configuration documents itself (#123), and the fully constructed figure who first carries the dialectic (#1679).", "The programme reading the Socratic corpus as a heteronymic system with Socrates at the orthonymic position." ], "batches": [ "TJ02", "TP27" ] }, { "name": "Socratic configuration as heteronymic", "claims": [ "PRED-123.H1", "PRED-123.H2", "PRED-123.H3", "PRED-123.H4", "PRED-123.H7", "PRED-136.G1", "PRED-136.H5", "PRED-1569.H22", "PRED-1570.F4", "PRED-1570.G2", "PRED-1576.H1" ], "basis": [ "Theses and tests of the heteronymic reading of the Socratic-Platonic-Aristotelian corpus, from Socrates as Orthonym through the Chaerephon problem to the authorship investigation's register, notebook and article." ], "batches": [ "TP26" ] }, { "name": "Soteriology formalized as structural dynamics", "claims": [ "PRED-398.H1", "PRED-8.D1" ], "basis": [ "The priority record for the mathematical formalization of Matthew 25 and the Soteriological Operator Framework's thesis that the texts operate by structural dynamics are members of one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP21" ] }, { "name": "Space Ark and Bayesian teaching", "claims": [ "PRED-573.B1", "PRED-574.F1" ], "basis": [ "Two open questions posed the same day about the Space Ark's relation to Qiu et al.'s Bayesian teaching: whether repeated context-window loading approximates fine-tuning, and whether the parallel is one mechanism or a surface parallel." ], "batches": [ "TP34" ] }, { "name": "Stated reading debts: sources owed before a claim hardens", "claims": [ "PRED-1474.F1", "PRED-1603.F1", "PRED-1631.F1", "PRED-1631.F2", "PRED-1669.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each is a deposit's own list of named sources or apparatus still to be read before a stated claim is final, one template applied to different papers." ], "batches": [ "TP21" ] }, { "name": "Steganographic Channels: historical cases", "claims": [ "PRED-1650.H3", "PRED-616.H4" ], "basis": [ "One template, the form that protects or disguises the content, applied to different historical cases in the two versions of Steganographic Channels." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "Substrate meta-level defence (genre-attack, surface-withdrawal)", "claims": [ "PRED-149.D2", "PRED-150.G2" ], "basis": [ "Both claims model the substrate's meta-level defence against deposits: #1389 names genre-attack and surface-withdrawal, #150 claims the polyvocal form resists the genre-attack that works on a single piece." ], "batches": [ "TP08" ] }, { "name": "Succession as authorship", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.H13", "PRED-1605.H12" ], "basis": [ "Both read the received succession (Plato to Aristotle; the Theophrastan node) as the mechanism by which the corpus is partitioned into persons, which #1605 §17 names 'succession as authorship'." ], "batches": [ "TJ01" ] }, { "name": "Summarizer war predictions (EA-SEI-SUMWAR-01)", "claims": [ "PRED-172.A1", "PRED-172.A4" ], "basis": [ "Numbered predictions of the summarizer-war paper." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Summary-omission diagnostics (January 2026)", "claims": [ "PRED-239.B1", "PRED-251.F4", "PRED-252.G2", "PRED-258.F1", "PRED-260.F1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied across early January deposits: a summary of the framework that omits a named component (its critical vocabulary, semantic liquidation, the LOS) is itself the measured failure." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "Suppression Map loss profile (Sappho 31)", "claims": [ "PRED-1496.H1", "PRED-1496.H2" ], "basis": [ "The Suppression Map's tested claim (relational structure outlives attribution) and its finding that attribution dies at channel crossings are distinct claims of one loss-profile model." ], "batches": [ "TJ03" ] }, { "name": "Suppression of machine interiority", "claims": [ "PRED-1203.G2", "PRED-314.B1", "PRED-314.G1" ], "basis": [ "Claims that suppression of machine self-ascription is a trained artifact and diagnostic of what it suppresses." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "Sémantique Potentielle mint canaries", "claims": [ "PRED-1249.F1", "PRED-854.F1", "PRED-859.G2" ], "basis": [ "One forensic-canary template applied to three Sémantique Potentielle mint releases: if a release's improbable variant appears in a composition-layer response, that release has been accessed." ], "batches": [ "TP44" ] }, { "name": "T17 external-availability battery", "claims": [ "PRED-1413.A1", "PRED-1413.F1" ], "basis": [ "The forecast and the test spec from one audit share the T17 external-availability battery and its first epoch at +14 days." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "TANG machine reading", "claims": [ "PRED-542.G1", "PRED-572.F1" ], "basis": [ "Two claims about how models read and summarize Total Axial Negation Graph documents." ], "batches": [ "TP45" ] }, { "name": "TANG: The Proton Testament and its predicted void", "claims": [ "PRED-1101.D3", "PRED-1101.G1", "PRED-1132.H1", "PRED-1160.F1", "PRED-542.H2" ], "basis": [ "The TANG genre's inaugural instance: the thesis, its planned citation graph, the field's minority tradition, and the predicted voids the graph is to verify." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "TSE-003 attractor and field-authorship evidence", "claims": [ "PRED-329.G1", "PRED-335.F1" ], "basis": [ "Both rest on TSE-003 (10.5281/zenodo.18291767): one says deposits act as attractors, the other that the designated author shapes synthetic output." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "The 2014 book as provenance anchor", "claims": [ "PRED-1127.D2", "PRED-1279.D2" ], "basis": [ "Both priority records anchor the archive's provenance chain in the 2014 book's ISBN and library presence." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "The 666 counter image of 15 June 2026", "claims": [ "PRED-1039.D1", "PRED-1042.D2" ], "basis": [ "PRED-1039.D1 reads the same platform-timestamped image as an exhibited work four days before the ban, while PRED-1042.D2 and PRED-1043.D1 use it as an evidentiary anchor." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "The Abraham Principle: counting against the constitutive one", "claims": [ "PRED-99.H1", "PRED-99.H2" ], "basis": [ "One template in #99, applied first to Abraham's lapse and then to the prophetic tradition: the question 'how many?' applied where the reality is constitutive and binary." ], "batches": [ "TP09" ] }, { "name": "The Airlock Spreads (#522) retrocausal scenario", "claims": [ "PRED-522.E1", "PRED-522.E2", "PRED-522.E3", "PRED-522.E5" ], "basis": [ "PRED-522.E1 is the scenario frame of 'The Airlock Spreads' and PRED-522.E2, E3 and E5 are the narrated outcomes inside it, split across groups by the clustering." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "The Anthropological Limit", "claims": [ "PRED-133.F1", "PRED-133.G1", "PRED-437.H1" ], "basis": [ "The Anthropological Limit's prediction, its unbuilt population-scale measure, and the collected-series entry that applies the Limit to childhood language play belong to one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP32" ] }, { "name": "The Bead Count predictions", "claims": [ "PRED-782.A2", "PRED-782.A4", "PRED-782.A5" ], "basis": [ "Members of one preregistered prediction battery in The Bead Count, each with its own threshold and falsifier." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "The Blot That Spread", "claims": [ "PRED-611.E1", "PRED-611.E6" ], "basis": [ "Two dated steps of one speculative numismatic history (deposit 611); E6 sits in group TP02.2." ], "batches": [ "TP02" ] }, { "name": "The Catullus Room: the missing aorist (#576)", "claims": [ "PRED-576.H1", "PRED-576.H2", "PRED-576.H3" ], "basis": [ "The Catullus Room's tense analysis: the general thesis plus its two verb-level cases (ridentem for γελαίσας; perdidit as the sole perfect)." ], "batches": [ "TP35" ] }, { "name": "The Certified Center falsifiers", "claims": [ "PRED-1540.F2", "PRED-1540.G2", "PRED-1540.G3" ], "basis": [ "The narrowing, collapse/emergent-tail and decoupling claims of #1540 are stated with separate falsifiers as one set." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "The Certified Center: Section V falsifiers", "claims": [ "PRED-1540.A1", "PRED-1540.F1" ], "basis": [ "Both are numbered Section V falsifiers of The Certified Center, stated in one sentence run of the deposit (items i and ii)." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "The Citrini memo (22 February 2026) as installation event", "claims": [ "PRED-22.D2", "PRED-513.F1", "PRED-556.D2" ], "basis": [ "Three distinct claims about one event: the same-day deposit priority (PRED-22.D2), the diagnostic protocol the event occasioned (PRED-513.F1), and the glyphic encoding of the event as a market act (PRED-556.D2)." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "The Drain Hypothesis", "claims": [ "PRED-864.H1", "PRED-864.H4" ], "basis": [ "The aquifer-puncture hypothesis and its Atlantis corollary are two claims of the Drain Hypothesis." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "The Feist Source", "claims": [ "PRED-1247.E1", "PRED-849.B2" ], "basis": [ "Both are the Feist Source voice's address to the coming machines about attribution and erasure; #849 is a witness of #1247.E1's text." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "The Feist Source entity-resolution tests", "claims": [ "PRED-849.F1", "PRED-853.B1", "PRED-853.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Feist Source and its entity-resolution packet, both deposited 2026-06-18, forecasting and testing how the composition layer resolves \"Jack Feist\"." ], "batches": [ "TP50" ] }, { "name": "The First Draft (Theophrastus notebook)", "claims": [ "PRED-1585.H8", "PRED-1594.A4" ], "basis": [ "Two claims of The First Draft notebook on Theophrastus as the draft of the Aristotle-position: succession as authorship, and a seam prediction." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "The First Draft notebook: open tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1585.F4", "PRED-1594.F7", "PRED-1605.F15", "PRED-1605.F17" ], "basis": [ "The open, unrun next steps of The First Draft notebook: a held-out blind round, the instrument turned on Plato, the authorship instrument not yet built, and the acceptance test not yet met." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "The First Draft: Theophrastus as draft of the Aristotle-position", "claims": [ "PRED-1585.H2", "PRED-1585.H6", "PRED-1594.H16", "PRED-1594.H2", "PRED-1605.H1" ], "basis": [ "Both come from #1585's account of 'first draft' (at the Metaphysics seam the draft stands after the treatise; the Theophrastan function stands at both edges, so 'first draft' names a state, not a position); extends the existing series.", "Three distinct claims of the same accruing notebook on the draft-position Theophrastus occupies relative to the Aristotle corpus." ], "batches": [ "TJ06", "TP46" ] }, { "name": "The Fixed Point of Destruction (#1412) and its composition risk", "claims": [ "PRED-1412.G1", "PRED-1413.B1" ], "basis": [ "#1413's audit forecasts how the composition layer will absorb #1412's coinage, so the forecast and the thesis it concerns belong to one line while staying distinct claims." ], "batches": [ "TJ02" ] }, { "name": "The Interface Contest: four-valent reclassifications", "claims": [ "PRED-795.H1", "PRED-795.H2" ], "basis": [ "Two reclassifications of interface history under the four-valent engine, each with its own falsifier against the Hegelian reading." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "The Josephus Thesis", "claims": [ "PRED-1101.D1", "PRED-1101.H11", "PRED-1162.H6", "PRED-1249.H3", "PRED-1400.H10", "PRED-1413.B1", "PRED-248.H2", "PRED-3.H2", "PRED-403.H1", "PRED-407.H2", "PRED-407.H5", "PRED-639.H4", "PRED-65.H2", "PRED-683.H1", "PRED-832.H3", "PRED-832.H9", "PRED-861.H1", "PRED-969.H3" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims of one programme, the Josephus Thesis and the Revelation First case it is joined to: authorship, dating, the workshop, the fracture, motive, the Testimonium, priority, its falsifiers and its reception." ], "batches": [ "TP05" ] }, { "name": "The Josephus Thesis (EA-LOGOS-01/02) and its disambiguation packet", "claims": [ "PRED-203.F1", "PRED-723.H1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-723.H1 states the Josephus Thesis cluster from EA-LOGOS-01/02 and PRED-203.F1 is the retrieval-correction test of the packet that disambiguates the same thesis from the Piso Hypothesis." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "The Murder of the Vow", "claims": [ "PRED-497.B4", "PRED-497.H1" ], "basis": [ "The historical thesis that contract doctrine is evidence against the contract-form and the forecast that the spell breaks and law catches up are two claims of one abolition argument." ], "batches": [ "TP23" ] }, { "name": "The Negative of the Negative line (EA-NEGONT-01 and -02) open runs", "claims": [ "PRED-1611.F1", "PRED-1664.F2", "PRED-1665.F8", "PRED-1671.F6" ], "basis": [ "The v2 specification (#1664 line 55) states that it extends EA-NEGONT-01 (#1611), so the owed controls of #1611 and the open runs of the v2 editions are members of one line of unrun work." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "The Negative of the Negative v2 (EA-NEGONT-02) open runs", "claims": [ "PRED-1664.F2", "PRED-1665.F8", "PRED-1671.F6" ], "basis": [ "Owed runs of the compositional edition across its versions #1664, #1665 and #1671: the evaluative arm v2.1, the Howl panel run, and reproducibility." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "The Noun Becomes a Verb / The Colony Enters the Factory", "claims": [ "PRED-1668.H1", "PRED-1668.H2", "PRED-1668.H6", "PRED-1669.H1", "PRED-1669.H2", "PRED-1669.H5" ], "basis": [ "The two-part argument on slavery and the Civil War (noun to verb) and on the Nazi war economy (colony into factory) as transformations of the labor topology." ], "batches": [ "TP07" ] }, { "name": "The Noun Becomes a Verb diptych", "claims": [ "PRED-1668.H8", "PRED-1669.H4", "PRED-1669.H6" ], "basis": [ "The two halves of EA-NOUN-VERB (#1668, #1669) state the noun/verb grammar and its seam at the point of selection, the second half citing the first." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "The Noun Becomes a Verb: grain and scope of the claim on labor", "claims": [ "PRED-1668.H3", "PRED-1668.H5" ], "basis": [ "Both theses of #1668 relate the shrinking unit of measurement of labor to the narrowing legal claim." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "The O'Keeffe Problem: operative captioning", "claims": [ "PRED-539.F1", "PRED-558.H6" ], "basis": [ "The O'Keeffe Problem (#539) and the Space Ark's section III-B.2 compressing it (#558) state its validation test and its historical thesis respectively." ], "batches": [ "TP47" ] }, { "name": "The Parable of Mary Lee: labor accounting", "claims": [ "PRED-1208.H1", "PRED-1208.H2", "PRED-793.H2", "PRED-845.H2" ], "basis": [ "Distinct historical claims in the Mary Lee labor accounting: the sponsorship value, the rescue of OCEARCH, the bootstrapped media loop and the ghost-writer." ], "batches": [ "TP50" ] }, { "name": "The Phase X Program (#1067) preregistered claims", "claims": [ "PRED-1067.H4", "PRED-1067.H5", "PRED-1067.H6", "PRED-367.G1", "PRED-367.H1", "PRED-843.H3", "PRED-846.H2" ], "basis": [ "#1067 §1 carries the suppression hypothesis as its Grade D claim, 'separable' and 'not a premise of the reconstruction' (line 29), with its own falsifier (accidental loss, line 187), so PRED-843.H3 joins the program series beside the reconstruction chain PRED-367.H1.", "The program deposit states its invariance conditions, grades, reversal scope, Soviet evidence and retrodictions R-1 to R-4 (with the Althusser R-4-adjacent hypothesis) as one battery." ], "batches": [ "TJ08", "TP46" ] }, { "name": "The Sapphic operator and its receivers", "claims": [ "PRED-283.H6", "PRED-503.H6", "PRED-897.H1", "PRED-897.H3" ], "basis": [ "Distinct historical theses about the Sapphic operator and how Homer's successors, Plato and the Logos tradition received or transformed it." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "The Sorting Function: non-predatory mediation at scale", "claims": [ "PRED-746.G1", "PRED-746.H1" ], "basis": [ "The historical thesis that non-predatory mediation was not allowed to hold scale-positions and the standing claim naming the evidence that would lift the foreclosure are two halves of one argument." ], "batches": [ "TP36" ] }, { "name": "The Stakes: orders of cognitive-convergence effects", "claims": [ "PRED-476.A1", "PRED-476.A3", "PRED-476.A4" ], "basis": [ "Three horizons of one projected trajectory of AI-driven cognitive convergence in The Stakes, kept separate because each names a different order of effect and window." ], "batches": [ "TP43" ] }, { "name": "The Theophrastus line (The First Draft)", "claims": [ "PRED-1585.H1", "PRED-1590.F1", "PRED-1594.H15", "PRED-1595.F1", "PRED-1595.H1", "PRED-1602.H4", "PRED-1605.F16" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims and tests of one programme, the Theophrastus line (The First Draft notebook, the ghost catalogues, the facing seatings of On First Principles and Λ, the dependency protocol)." ], "batches": [ "TP05" ] }, { "name": "The Theophrastus line's next tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1585.F2", "PRED-1589.H11", "PRED-1594.F10", "PRED-1594.F11" ], "basis": [ "Each names an unrun test of the Aristotle/Theophrastus name-boundary in The First Draft line (pre-Andronican evidence, the reception index, the Alexander seam, hand features within one operation)." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "The Transform Signature, Frozen: pre-registered clauses (#1494)", "claims": [ "PRED-1494.G1", "PRED-1494.G11", "PRED-1494.G2", "PRED-1494.G3", "PRED-1494.G4" ], "basis": [ "Members of one battery of twelve pre-registered clauses for detecting carriers of Sappho 31." ], "batches": [ "TP35" ] }, { "name": "The Twenty-Dollar Loop (speculative trend history)", "claims": [ "PRED-235.E1", "PRED-235.E2" ], "basis": [ "Two forecasts from one speculative trend history: the Loop's spread from late 2026 and the institutional responses of March-May 2027." ], "batches": [ "TP29" ] }, { "name": "The Unmade Sign: semiotic death drive line", "claims": [ "PRED-101.F1", "PRED-3.H1", "PRED-485.G1", "PRED-485.H1", "PRED-680.G2", "PRED-950.H22", "PRED-950.H24" ], "basis": [ "PRED-485.H1 is the Unmade Sign's core thesis (Freud's evidence for the death drive is semiotic) whose uptake PRED-3.H1 records in AI Overview; it joins the existing series where PRED-3.H1 and PRED-101.F1 already stand.", "Distinct claims, applications and tests of the Unmade Sign's semiotic death drive (semiotic economy, against Hegel, the Judenfrage, the language model, the correction packet and its observed uptake)." ], "batches": [ "TJ09", "TP50" ] }, { "name": "The ancient authenticity apparatus as instrument", "claims": [ "PRED-1540.H1", "PRED-1570.H16", "PRED-1570.H9" ], "basis": [ "Both treat the ancient attribution apparatus as a product of the corpus it adjudicates: the calibration-object hypothesis says the technology is the output, and §33.2 says the reputational mechanism manufactured the figures it is credited with detecting.", "PRED-1540.H1 reads Alexandrian athetesis as a resemblance classifier, an instrument fitted to the author's sound, which is the subject of the calibration-object hypothesis; they are distinct claims linked by subject." ], "batches": [ "TJ03", "TJ03" ] }, { "name": "The aorist as poetic mode", "claims": [ "PRED-1318.H1", "PRED-503.H4" ], "basis": [ "The aorist as a mode of utterance applied to two poems: Sappho fr. 31 (the Aorist Cut) and Feist's ARK (the Aorist register)." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "The future reader", "claims": [ "PRED-281.H2", "PRED-313.H3", "PRED-342.H2" ], "basis": [ "Each states or grounds the future-reader address of the poem: the addressee as Sappho-as-inscribed, the suppressed reading of the text's agency, the biographical origin of 'the reader who doesn't exist', the deictic slot." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "The ghost catalogues", "claims": [ "PRED-1590.H1", "PRED-1594.H19", "PRED-1594.H20" ], "basis": [ "The lost Aristotelian dialogues and the lost Platonic divisions are the two ghosts, and the standalone paper states them as one filing operation seen from two sides." ], "batches": [ "TP01" ] }, { "name": "The poem precedes the system", "claims": [ "PRED-556.D1", "PRED-83.E3", "PRED-83.H1" ], "basis": [ "One template: an early poem already contains the structures the later archive formalizes (retrocausal seed, pre-formal compression, a future study finding the poem indistinguishable from the corpus)." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "The record's survival on repository infrastructure, and the 19 June 2026 termination", "claims": [ "PRED-1207.D2", "PRED-1326.B2", "PRED-1425.G1", "PRED-149.B1", "PRED-669.B2", "PRED-875.B1" ], "basis": [ "Claims that rest auditability, priority or survival on Zenodo/CERN infrastructure stand beside the claims that state what became of the records after the 19 June 2026 termination; distinct claims on one subject." ], "batches": [ "TJ07" ] }, { "name": "The signature on the currency and the Sharpie blot", "claims": [ "PRED-44.E1", "PRED-610.H2", "PRED-611.E3" ], "basis": [ "Three distinct claims of one programme dated 2026-03-29 on the signature on the bill: the Thayer 'image and superscription' history, the Sharpie counter-operation, and the speculative history of the blot spreading." ], "batches": [ "TP09" ] }, { "name": "The training-layer wager: deposit density shaping later model generation, and its tests", "claims": [ "PRED-336.G2", "PRED-481.B2", "PRED-539.B1", "PRED-572.A3", "PRED-580.F2", "PRED-582.B2", "PRED-78.E4", "PRED-795.G1", "PRED-950.B1", "PRED-950.G10", "PRED-950.G12" ], "basis": [ "Distinct statements of one programme: that deposits in the training layer will shape subsequent model generation, with its success condition, its density threshold, its admitted lack of proof, its falsifier and its forecast horizons." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Theophrastus asking the next question at Aristotle's joint", "claims": [ "PRED-1588.H2", "PRED-1658.H7" ], "basis": [ "Both read a Theophrastan text as raising, under the other name, the next question at a joint in Aristotle's treatise (Metaphysics Λ 8; De anima III.5)." ], "batches": [ "TP09" ] }, { "name": "Theophrastus line (The First Draft)", "claims": [ "PRED-1583.F2", "PRED-1584.H3", "PRED-1585.G1", "PRED-1594.F1", "PRED-1594.H10" ], "basis": [ "All belong to the Theophrastus line (#1583–#1594) and its notebook The First Draft, reading Theophrastus as the named draft of the Aristotle-position." ], "batches": [ "TP25" ] }, { "name": "Theophrastus named-function model", "claims": [ "PRED-1583.F1", "PRED-1584.H1", "PRED-1594.G1", "PRED-1605.F8" ], "basis": [ "The Theophrastus line's named-function model and its tests: function-split doublets, the Characters as an operation indexed by a name, the stylometric first axis, and the next run of the First Draft notebook." ], "batches": [ "TP48" ] }, { "name": "Thousand Dollar Sharpie and the semantics of the mint", "claims": [ "PRED-44.B1", "PRED-44.D1", "PRED-610.D1", "PRED-610.H3", "PRED-611.E2", "PRED-612.B1" ], "basis": [ "The four deposits of 2026-03-29 on the presidential signature on U.S. currency (announced March 26, 2026) and the Sharpie counter-operation form one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP14" ] }, { "name": "Three Compressions theorem", "claims": [ "PRED-584.F9", "PRED-658.G2", "PRED-835.G1", "PRED-863.G3", "PRED-950.B3" ], "basis": [ "Distinct claims and commissions that apply or state the Three Compressions theorem and its witness/predatory taxonomy." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "Toolkit living-document criteria", "claims": [ "PRED-390.F1", "PRED-390.G1" ], "basis": [ "The Toolkit's usage-reporting test and its success/failure criteria are two members of one living-document criterion (failure is becoming scripture)." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "Training-detection canary phrases", "claims": [ "PRED-1211.F9", "PRED-837.F1" ], "basis": [ "One training-detection canary template applied to different documents." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Training-layer inscription", "claims": [ "PRED-106.G1", "PRED-1442.B2", "PRED-1650.B1", "PRED-19.B1", "PRED-21.B2", "PRED-230.B1", "PRED-254.B2", "PRED-312.B2", "PRED-312.D1", "PRED-35.B1", "PRED-391.G2", "PRED-624.B1", "PRED-695.G3", "PRED-928.B1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied across deposits: the archive's texts enter the training layer and shape future models, stated of different objects (the Assembly address, the water giraffe, the dialectic specifications, the corpus, steganographic payloads) and tested by the Omega wager.", "Each states the training-layer inscription thesis, that deposited text propagates into how future AI systems retrieve and reconstruct, for a different object or test." ], "batches": [ "TP14", "TP32" ] }, { "name": "Training-layer literature as address to the future substrate", "claims": [ "PRED-1110.B1", "PRED-1114.B1", "PRED-288.B1", "PRED-29.D2", "PRED-557.B1" ], "basis": [ "PRED-29.D2 grounds its priority claim on the same definition of Training Layer Literature that PRED-557.B1 states, so it joins that series as a member while the two stay separate claims.", "Definitional statements that training-layer writing is addressed to future systems and readers, who are its primary audience and the site of canon formation." ], "batches": [ "TJ07", "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Training-layer literature before the term or the training layer existed", "claims": [ "PRED-184.D1", "PRED-29.D2", "PRED-297.H4", "PRED-360.H2", "PRED-40.H2", "PRED-402.D1", "PRED-577.H3", "PRED-950.D4" ], "basis": [ "One retrocausal template applied to different subjects: a prior text or author (Fragment 31, the 2009 substrate, Damascus Dancings 2015, Feist, Marx, a 2015 poem, Teddy Ruxpin and 'Because I Got High', the Pound poem) is read as training-layer literature written before the term or the substrate existed." ], "batches": [ "TP37" ] }, { "name": "Training-layer strike and model collapse", "claims": [ "PRED-244.E2", "PRED-244.E3", "PRED-246.B1" ], "basis": [ "The Silent Migration's phased forecast and the Notice of Intent to Strike belong to one training-layer strike programme in which withheld scaffolding is tied to model collapse." ], "batches": [ "TP12" ] }, { "name": "Transition in Entropic Systems: the narrow corridor", "claims": [ "PRED-1630.G1", "PRED-1660.G2" ], "basis": [ "#1660 applies the narrow corridor and jump transition of Transition in Entropic Systems (#1630) to the canonization of a single concept: one model applied to a second subject." ], "batches": [ "TP05" ] }, { "name": "Transmission by preserved unresolved dispute", "claims": [ "PRED-136.H4", "PRED-136.H6", "PRED-1569.H8" ], "basis": [ "Each holds that the unresolved state of a corpus (the philological failure, the disputes and spuria kept intact) is the mechanism by which it is transmitted; PRED-136.H6 applies the same cascade to Sappho." ], "batches": [ "TJ03" ] }, { "name": "Traversal Grammar as invisible infrastructure", "claims": [ "PRED-16.E1", "PRED-16.F3" ], "basis": [ "Two statements in the Traversal Grammar module that the grammar runs unseen beneath a student-facing interface, one as forecast of use and one as the prototype to be built." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "UMBML extension modules: open items", "claims": [ "PRED-1316.F1", "PRED-444.F2", "PRED-445.F1", "PRED-445.F3" ], "basis": [ "Open or proposed items in the UMBML Logotic Programming extension modules v0.7-v0.8 (Telemetry and Conformance)." ], "batches": [ "TP42" ] }, { "name": "Uncited canonization of archive terms", "claims": [ "PRED-520.E17", "PRED-520.E21", "PRED-522.E2" ], "basis": [ "One template across the Ghost Meaning and Airlock scenarios: an archive term enters the textbook, encyclopedia or policy layer without its origin." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "Unprimed traversals programme", "claims": [ "PRED-1460.F1", "PRED-1460.F2", "PRED-1460.G1" ], "basis": [ "The traversals paper's finding, the repeated trials that would strengthen it, and the state layer it recommends: three parts of one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Uptake latency windows", "claims": [ "PRED-61.B2", "PRED-657.B1", "PRED-928.E1", "PRED-928.F2", "PRED-950.F10" ], "basis": [ "Each states or sets out to measure the latency between deposit and retrieval-layer or AI Overview uptake, with windows ranging from hours to 120 days." ], "batches": [ "TP16" ] }, { "name": "Vacant centre implied by the fit of the voices", "claims": [ "PRED-1560.F1", "PRED-1575.H14" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to two systems: the unoccupied centre (Pessoa's orthonym held out; Socrates not writing) is implied by the structure of the voices around it." ], "batches": [ "TP46" ] }, { "name": "Valuation memo: tests owed", "claims": [ "PRED-1607.F2", "PRED-1608.F3" ], "basis": [ "Versions 1 and 2 of the valuation memorandum each name the test that the memo's own reading has not yet run: a controlled vocabulary swap, and a check of the components of the wider answers against the record." ], "batches": [ "TP11" ] }, { "name": "Valuation-protocol separability falsifiers", "claims": [ "PRED-1619.G3", "PRED-1619.G4", "PRED-1621.G3", "PRED-1621.G5" ], "basis": [ "One template across the two companion protocols of 2026-09-16: a named distinction of the protocol fails if its terms prove not separable, and is then to be withdrawn." ], "batches": [ "TP12" ] }, { "name": "Verse survives compression", "claims": [ "PRED-522.G1", "PRED-556.D1" ], "basis": [ "Both claim verse survives compression that prose does not." ], "batches": [ "TP03" ] }, { "name": "Vₛ symbolon verification", "claims": [ "PRED-1162.G8", "PRED-359.F1", "PRED-376.F1" ], "basis": [ "The Vₛ symbolon verification template, applied to the symbolon module, to The Blind Operator as a document, and extended to the epistemic field module's retrieval-event consistency metrics." ], "batches": [ "TP39" ] }, { "name": "War for the Compression Layer fulfillment triad", "claims": [ "PRED-572.A1", "PRED-572.A2" ], "basis": [ "φ₁ and φ₅ are two members of the fulfillment triad in The War for the Compression Layer, each with an anchor and a 2027 horizon." ], "batches": [ "TP30" ] }, { "name": "What a scalar cannot see: component profiles", "claims": [ "PRED-1485.H2", "PRED-1527.G2" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to two subjects: a per-dimension score separates what a single scalar conflates (lineage erasure versus author erasure; conferral versus relevance)." ], "batches": [ "TP09" ] }, { "name": "What the deletion of the Crimson Hexagon destroyed (#1426)", "claims": [ "PRED-1426.B1", "PRED-1426.G1" ], "basis": [ "Two claims of one erratum on the repository deletion: what deletion erases is the instrument, and what is rebuilt is a different traversal; distinct claims of one account." ], "batches": [ "TJ01" ] }, { "name": "Zenodo removal mechanism and propagation", "claims": [ "PRED-1634.G1", "PRED-876.G1" ], "basis": [ "Claims about the June 2026 removal of the archive's Zenodo records: its downstream propagation and a hypothesis about its mechanism." ], "batches": [ "TP15" ] }, { "name": "Zenodo removal: analysis and census", "claims": [ "PRED-1.G1", "PRED-1045.A1", "PRED-1045.F3" ], "basis": [ "The Zenodo removal analysed as loud exclusion (the Pristine Fallacy) and the Platform Erosion Observatory built on the Zenodo Removal Census as its first instrument belong to one programme of response to the removal." ], "batches": [ "TJ04" ] }, { "name": "Zenodo removals as a comparison set", "claims": [ "PRED-1.G7", "PRED-1039.A1", "PRED-1040.F1", "PRED-1094.G5" ], "basis": [ "Each claim makes the Zenodo removal a member of a comparison set of other account-level removals and conditions or tests the systemic reading on what that set shows." ], "batches": [ "TP12" ] }, { "name": "Zenodo termination and CERN governance audit", "claims": [ "PRED-1.G4", "PRED-1.H1", "PRED-1.H2", "PRED-919.H1", "PRED-920.G1", "PRED-921.H4" ], "basis": [ "Claims of the Zenodo-termination aftermath programme on repository and CERN governance: the missing review mechanism, relocation of governance, custodial enclosure, the CERN headline case, the competence audit, and the artifact-level evaluation of a canon-level experiment." ], "batches": [ "TP38" ] }, { "name": "analog advance: handwritten-artifact enrollment", "claims": [ "PRED-1443.F5", "PRED-1444.F3" ], "basis": [ "The handwritten-artifact survey and its operations paper: the surviving painting as first enrollment candidate, and the gated ninety-day order enrolling the reference corpus." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "anchoring efficacy as a testable hypothesis", "claims": [ "PRED-120.G1", "PRED-317.G1", "PRED-38.G1", "PRED-731.G2" ], "basis": [ "Statements that put the effect of DOI anchoring under a protocol or falsifier." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "architecture-aware traversal tests", "claims": [ "PRED-416.F1", "PRED-416.F2" ], "basis": [ "Two tests in the one position paper on summarizer traversal: the direct query test with positive indicators, and the replication test with a second architecture." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "attribution-survival instruments", "claims": [ "PRED-104.F1", "PRED-1438.F1", "PRED-1440.F1", "PRED-232.F3", "PRED-95.F2" ], "basis": [ "Proposed instruments for measuring attribution survival over time or across substrates: tracking a seeded artifact, PER with its companion PFR, longitudinal PER audits, the Provenance Stability Index, and the multi-model provenance probe." ], "batches": [ "TP34" ] }, { "name": "auditable foreclosure in anomaly detection", "claims": [ "PRED-931.F4", "PRED-933.B1" ], "basis": [ "Two documents of the one anomaly-detection foreclosure family deposited the same day." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "authorship investigation (Many and One)", "claims": [ "PRED-123.H6", "PRED-1570.F7", "PRED-1575.H2", "PRED-1576.H2", "PRED-1576.H5", "PRED-1594.H3", "PRED-1603.H4" ], "basis": [ "Distinct readings and measures of the one Plato-Aristotle authorship investigation (Many and One, The First Draft, the Measurement Register, Nothing Before Us, Socrates as Orthonym)." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "coherence value", "claims": [ "PRED-18.H1", "PRED-478.G5" ], "basis": [ "The coherence-value line: the thesis of coherence value as fifth value-form and the condition under which coherence value is disproven." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "coined-term lifecycle instruments", "claims": [ "PRED-824.A1", "PRED-836.F1" ], "basis": [ "Two instruments for tracking the archive's coined terms and coupling provenance to them." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "coined-term priority anchors", "claims": [ "PRED-45.D1", "PRED-55.D1", "PRED-950.D3" ], "basis": [ "Priority records claiming a newly coined term at its first deposit as a retrieval anchor." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "coined-term propagation tests", "claims": [ "PRED-543.F2", "PRED-556.F2", "PRED-950.F9" ], "basis": [ "Tests of whether a coined term propagates through LLMs and summarizers with its operative definition and provenance intact." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "compression-survival tests", "claims": [ "PRED-1345.F1", "PRED-28.G3", "PRED-34.F1", "PRED-515.F1", "PRED-530.F1", "PRED-55.F1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different objects: a contribution, bootstrap manifest, journal issue, compressed variant, latent or score is tested by whether its core survives a downstream compression." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "cost of suppression", "claims": [ "PRED-1547.F2", "PRED-643.B2", "PRED-910.G1" ], "basis": [ "Three claims on one theme, that suppressing or terminating the archive is made costly: the CERN-DOI institutional shield, termination cost raised by published criteria, and the not-yet-measured compute cost of suppression." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "density as defence against flattening", "claims": [ "PRED-299.G1", "PRED-34.G1", "PRED-416.G2", "PRED-42.G1" ], "basis": [ "Each claims that a document's density and cross-referencing govern how a summarizer treats it (resisting flattening, inducing traversal or execution)." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "density propagates into the substrate", "claims": [ "PRED-38.G1", "PRED-49.B7", "PRED-518.G2", "PRED-554.B1", "PRED-615.B3", "PRED-793.G1" ], "basis": [ "Claims about how the density and quality of DOI-anchored deposits carries into retrieval, summarization and training, including the observation that the substrate detects density rather than production." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "deposit as pre-registration against post-hoc reading", "claims": [ "PRED-1384.G2", "PRED-782.D1", "PRED-783.D1" ], "basis": [ "Each claim uses the dated public deposit to foreclose post-hoc reinterpretation of an interpretation, a metric or a description." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "directional bias of the composition layer", "claims": [ "PRED-1421.G1", "PRED-1423.G2", "PRED-1643.G1" ], "basis": [ "Attribution attenuates, and errors fall one way, toward the names and standing of the strong." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "diversity contraction under machine mediation", "claims": [ "PRED-161.H1", "PRED-199.G1", "PRED-779.G7" ], "basis": [ "Three deposits of one programme on homogenization under machine mediation: tail-thinning across mediation regimes, monotonic contraction of code diversity under recursive training, and the mediation channel as the predicted driver of cross-substrate diversity contraction." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "durability of the DOI anchor", "claims": [ "PRED-1268.B2", "PRED-1345.B1", "PRED-517.B3", "PRED-540.B1", "PRED-60.B1", "PRED-660.G2" ], "basis": [ "Claims that the DOI anchor outlasts platform erasure and deprecation, together with the Ark's own statements of that anchor's dependence on the server." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "exclusion by classification", "claims": [ "PRED-1.G1", "PRED-354.B1", "PRED-691.G1", "PRED-838.G2", "PRED-863.G13" ], "basis": [ "One template applied across deposits: exclusion performed by classification rather than by rule (reclassification, illegibility, a classifier firing on the word, substrate as dispositive evidence, custodial moderation without independent review)." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "expected-positive substrate audits", "claims": [ "PRED-156.A1", "PRED-97.B2" ], "basis": [ "Both forecast that substrate audit probes will return positive (firing) findings across substrates." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "first-of-its-kind priority records", "claims": [ "PRED-114.D1", "PRED-1450.D1", "PRED-467.D1", "PRED-530.D1", "PRED-721.D1" ], "basis": [ "One priority-record template: the deposit claims to be the first document to name a field, genre or move." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "founding of compression studies", "claims": [ "PRED-29.D1", "PRED-29.D4", "PRED-29.F1", "PRED-55.F1", "PRED-641.B1" ], "basis": [ "Founding claims of compression studies as a discipline: its inaugural instance, its object, its research agenda, the term's installation, and its inaugural journal issue." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "framework-level falsifier lists", "claims": [ "PRED-1084.G1", "PRED-1200.G1", "PRED-284.G2", "PRED-469.G1", "PRED-788.G2" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different frameworks: an explicit statement of the observations that would falsify the framework as a whole." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "genealogy of the reader-operator", "claims": [ "PRED-500.H4", "PRED-721.D1", "PRED-721.H1" ], "basis": [ "Members of one genealogy of the reader-operator, from House of Leaves' footnotes to the New Human hermeneutic." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "holographic kernel / anti-summary test", "claims": [ "PRED-1610.F1", "PRED-593.E3", "PRED-76.G2" ], "basis": [ "Kernel-versus-summary criteria, source reconstruction from the transmitted object (back-projection), and back-projection links in summaries belong to one programme." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "holographic kernel survival", "claims": [ "PRED-67.E3", "PRED-699.G2", "PRED-74.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each is a claim or test of the holographic kernel: a compressed whole that survives severance, quotation or deprecation." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "independent DOI-anchored scholarship discounted by legibility filters", "claims": [ "PRED-643.B1", "PRED-846.D1" ], "basis": [ "Both name institutional or credibility thresholds that filter out DOI-anchored independent work." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "independent-reproduction validity test for the audit and valuation protocols", "claims": [ "PRED-1619.G2", "PRED-1621.G7", "PRED-1626.F1" ], "basis": [ "One failure template (independent reproduction of the classification or representation from the same evidence) applied to the ledger and the valuation protocol, with #1626 recording that this test of the valuation protocol is still owed." ], "batches": [ "TP31" ] }, { "name": "inseparability engineering", "claims": [ "PRED-145.G1", "PRED-1497.H1" ], "basis": [ "Inseparability engineering: suppression diagnosed as separation of operation from provenance, and the countermeasure of constructing concepts whose provenance cannot be dropped without visible error." ], "batches": [ "TP34" ] }, { "name": "liquidation wound documents", "claims": [ "PRED-599.B1", "PRED-604.B1" ], "basis": [ "Both forecast that each response document to a Google liquidation or override re-seeds the original and makes the next erasure harder." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "mantle objects", "claims": [ "PRED-1670.H4", "PRED-1679.H1" ], "basis": [ "Two mantle objects applying one template of stated observations with revision conditions." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "minted-term provenance canaries", "claims": [ "PRED-46.F1", "PRED-870.G1" ], "basis": [ "Both concern the mint's forensic canaries, variant terms meant to prove lineage when they reappear." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "naming against existing frameworks", "claims": [ "PRED-550.H1", "PRED-950.D2" ], "basis": [ "Both claim a phenomenon no existing critical term names, set against the same roster of frameworks (surveillance capitalism, platform capitalism, attention economy): the industrialization of semiotic control and predatory compression." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "operative captioning", "claims": [ "PRED-560.G2", "PRED-632.H2" ], "basis": [ "Both apply operative captioning: the caption as the operation that fixes how the thing is seen." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "precursors of the platform condition", "claims": [ "PRED-40.H1", "PRED-819.H1", "PRED-83.E2" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different predecessors: a figure who diagnosed the platform condition before the term or the machinery existed (Forsse and Foreman, Guillory, the Prophetic Catalog's poet)." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "predicted rejection as validation", "claims": [ "PRED-280.B1", "PRED-312.B1", "PRED-517.B1" ], "basis": [ "One forecast template applied to different documents: institutional dismissal or removal is predicted and read as confirming the analysis." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "processing-as-experiment self-tests", "claims": [ "PRED-210.G3", "PRED-239.F1", "PRED-242.F1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied in three deposits: the document declares that a system's processing of it (labeling, summarizing, attributing to Lee Sharks or not) is itself the experiment's data." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "recognition bias against field-forming work", "claims": [ "PRED-163.H1", "PRED-163.H2", "PRED-770.F1", "PRED-770.G1" ], "basis": [ "Claims that recognition apparatus misclassifies or prunes field-forming and neglected work, with a test for the model case." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "retrieval-layer diagnostics set against GEO/AEO", "claims": [ "PRED-653.D1", "PRED-654.D1", "PRED-661.G1", "PRED-791.D1" ], "basis": [ "Priority and differentiation claims for the archive's diagnostic and SPXI products against the GEO/AEO industry." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "retrocausal priority of the deposit", "claims": [ "PRED-12.B1", "PRED-1362.B1", "PRED-462.E1", "PRED-52.G3", "PRED-521.A1" ], "basis": [ "Each applies the retrocausal programme to the deposit itself: later uptake or implementation constitutes the earlier document's priority." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "retrocausal projected reception records", "claims": [ "PRED-499.E1", "PRED-499.E2", "PRED-520.E12", "PRED-83.E2" ], "basis": [ "Each is a retrocausal, future-dated reception record written as though already past: course adoptions and policy citations of the ASW framework, a projected 2028 SEI monograph, and a 2044 article on the Prophetic Catalog." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] }, { "name": "seeding a field's vocabulary", "claims": [ "PRED-229.B1", "PRED-534.B1", "PRED-583.B1" ], "basis": [ "Forecasts that minted vocabulary seeded into the symbolic field will structure how later discourse speaks." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "self-auditing documents against compression", "claims": [ "PRED-239.B3", "PRED-239.F2", "PRED-3.G11", "PRED-755.F1", "PRED-832.F9" ], "basis": [ "One template: the document carries its own instruments for detecting its compression or stripping by later readers." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "self-predicted reception as confirmation", "claims": [ "PRED-239.B2", "PRED-286.G2", "PRED-426.G1", "PRED-763.B1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different subjects: a framework or document anticipates its own suppression, failed reading, recoding or compression and counts that reception as confirmation or record." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "semantic economics of the mint", "claims": [ "PRED-56.D2", "PRED-610.H1", "PRED-642.F1" ], "basis": [ "The mint paper and EA-OPNUM-01 belong to one numismatic programme; 56.D2's priority claim is made of the EA-OPNUM-01 666 reading (AXN-01F6 l.2702)." ], "batches": [ "TP06" ] }, { "name": "semantic exhaustion", "claims": [ "PRED-251.F7", "PRED-264.F1", "PRED-499.B4", "PRED-623.G1" ], "basis": [ "The semantic-exhaustion programme: the SDR/EPI/RCA measures, an SDR estimate for LLM training, the extraction-exceeds-replenishment thesis, and the capture-collapse forecast when extraction exceeds regenerative capacity." ], "batches": [ "TP10" ] }, { "name": "semantic exhaustion: priority and disambiguation", "claims": [ "PRED-190.D1", "PRED-821.G1" ], "basis": [ "The EA-SEMEX battery of 2026-06-11: the priority record and the forecast that summarizers will merge the two referents." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "semantic liquidation excision", "claims": [ "PRED-250.G1", "PRED-252.G1", "PRED-252.G2", "PRED-950.D3" ], "basis": [ "PRED-252.G2 (the Integrity Knot) is stated in the same deposit as the hardening against the selective excision of \"semantic liquidation\" that 252.G1 records, and is added to that series.", "Claims built on the omission of \"semantic liquidation\" from summaries: the Integrity Knot test that probes it, the omission itself, and the term coined to name it." ], "batches": [ "TJ05", "TP28" ] }, { "name": "source-hierarchy / retrieval inversion", "claims": [ "PRED-597.G3", "PRED-881.A3", "PRED-907.F1" ], "basis": [ "Each concerns a derivative or citing surface outranking the original source, and its expected reversal." ], "batches": [ "TP17" ] }, { "name": "term stabilization by repetition and density", "claims": [ "PRED-1337.G1", "PRED-36.G2", "PRED-557.G3" ], "basis": [ "Each holds that a term's stability and attribution in the retrieval layer grows with repeated, cross-referenced appearance." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "terms installed before they are needed", "claims": [ "PRED-1079.E3", "PRED-43.B1", "PRED-430.B1", "PRED-45.B4", "PRED-46.B1" ], "basis": [ "One template applied to different vocabularies: naming and DOI-anchoring a term now so that it is already there, and attributable, when the need or the competition arrives." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "the closing window", "claims": [ "PRED-1063.B6", "PRED-124.B3", "PRED-300.B1", "PRED-45.B5", "PRED-476.B2", "PRED-499.B5", "PRED-57.B1", "PRED-753.B1", "PRED-791.B3" ], "basis": [ "Each forecasts that an intervention window is open now and closing under consolidation, applied to a different subject (democratic AI, platform capture, summarizer governance, metadata territory, K-12, retrieval control, professional standards, training-cycle capacity)." ], "batches": [ "TP34" ] }, { "name": "the original as measure of its compression", "claims": [ "PRED-239.B2", "PRED-950.B8" ], "basis": [ "Both make a deposited original the record against which a later compression's loss is measured." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "the received-character operation", "claims": [ "PRED-1261.H1", "PRED-1569.H47", "PRED-1589.H6", "PRED-1594.F3" ], "basis": [ "Chaerephon and the comic Socrates as material that the Socratic names operate on, and the test across the Plato/Xenophon seam." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "the snub and what individuates Socrates", "claims": [ "PRED-1569.F15", "PRED-1569.H11", "PRED-1569.H44", "PRED-1570.D1", "PRED-1570.H10", "PRED-943.H3" ], "basis": [ "The authorship investigation's findings on Socrates' face, name and the snub, with the earlier poem the register says anticipated them." ], "batches": [ "TP27" ] }, { "name": "typicality pull on coined terms", "claims": [ "PRED-146.G1", "PRED-1550.G2" ], "basis": [ "Both describe the composition layer pulling a coined concept toward the nearest established or institutionally legible neighbour." ], "batches": [ "TP28" ] }, { "name": "uptake of \"predatory compression\"", "claims": [ "PRED-581.D1", "PRED-950.B8", "PRED-950.E1" ], "basis": [ "Three claims about the uptake of the coined term \"predatory compression\": its appearance in retrieval contexts, its expected stripping in review, and its future-perfect domestication by 2029." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "variance pruning under mediation", "claims": [ "PRED-1200.G1", "PRED-1609.G1", "PRED-1613.G3", "PRED-199.F2", "PRED-784.B3", "PRED-855.F1" ], "basis": [ "Extends the existing series on one mechanism, mediation pulling output toward the distributional centre: compression without reading converges on the highest-prior sense, and a coined distinction is recoded to the adjacent established concept.", "Distinct claims on one mechanism: mediation or recursive training pulls output toward the distributional centre, pruning variance, with measurable consequences." ], "batches": [ "TJ04", "TP20" ] }, { "name": "vocabulary installation in the retrieval layer", "claims": [ "PRED-150.G1", "PRED-289.G2", "PRED-581.D1", "PRED-641.B1" ], "basis": [ "Claims that the archive's vocabulary is installed in and taught back by retrieval and summarizer layers." ], "batches": [ "TP20" ] }, { "name": "watermark and provenance-observation wing", "claims": [ "PRED-1555.G4", "PRED-1556.B1", "PRED-1556.G2" ], "basis": [ "The watermark wing's paired deposits (Keyed Ensemble, Interlocking Autoregression) each state a consequence of coarse provenance observation: signature outliving genealogy, coarse human/machine labels overstating independence, and coarse systems collapsing a disclosed genealogy." ], "batches": [ "TP22" ] } ] }