{ "row": "sophistical-refutations", "pass": "SPXI-gnΩsis reading, 2026-10-25", "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 §3.4 D/R/O with the hop. Admission by reading, two independent passes; a deposit on which they differ is admitted and marked extraction_contested, with both readings (§3.8). Hop candidates screened by string (a sentence that cites a deposit admitted by reading, names the entity, or shares two of the admitted passages' rare words) and the screened ones read.", "reader": "live (claude-sonnet-5-5; triage claude-haiku-5-5)", "candidate_files": { "candidates-D.jsonl": "5c1079cde634176e6b1a979daa23441c04f14bdc4e15a0b1b5c0fa14d2e0528c", "candidates-O.jsonl": "f6579d0bedcf1f5d0ad00321a1db76f8cdf726ec218a62ebeb8d1fe42ad2fe2a", "candidates-R.jsonl": "fdf4e3073a4f4c32ed4b6c918ea6e56607f25384133311a3c61cac37a9eb69e3", "candidates-H.jsonl": "267398baba9acf36c319648bffffcbbf287f53218a977b8ba4ae87245c3b4641" }, "verdicts": [ { "dep": 1574, "strata": [ "D", "O" ], "cands": [ "D0005", "O0005" ], "reason": "The deposit's abstract and title are about Sophistical Refutations 34 (183b34-36). They say what the sentence claims (nothing at all of the inquiry was there beforehand), that Aristotle there denies the inquiry was received from others, and that the treatise's own account of how negation is lost (SE 16, 175a10-12) predicts the observed deletion of the particle οὐ. This is direct description and mechanism for the treatise. Applying the archive's own coinages (Provenance Erasure, Disciplinary Model Collapse, The Particle) to the reception of the text is an ontological reading. The header-metadata candidates (D0003, D0004, O0003, O0004) only repeat front matter and carry no separate claim.", "lineage": "Aristotle at SE 183b34-36 denies prior work on the inquiry; machine-mediated reception erases the negation (provenance erasure).", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1576, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "D0033", "D0034" ], "reason": "D0033 states that at SE 34 Aristotle says nothing of his inquiry existed beforehand, a tension with Prior Analytics I.31, and the paper begins from it. D0034 describes SE 34 as closing the Topics–SE inquiry with a claim about its originality, resting on rhetoric's succession of inventors versus Aristotle's lack of inheritance. D0032 is the frontmatter keyword list and does not bear. This is the journal-article version (v2.13-AP) cut from the reading copy, repeating the originality-claim reading of SE 34.", "lineage": "SE 34 claims the Topics–SE inquiry had no predecessors, in tension with Prior Analytics I.31", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1579, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "D0036", "D0037" ], "reason": "D0036 gives a substantive reading of the SE epilogue: it dismisses the paid teachers of eristic (μισθαρνούντων) with the shoemaker analogy and sets Socrates apart, keyed to the confession of not knowing (183b7–8), with the Byzantine paraphrast's later gloss promoting Socrates to διαλεκτικὸς ἄκρος. D0037 is the footnote citing SE 34, 183b7–8 and 184a1–8 and a companion paper on Socrates and the ending of SE, with the paraphrast's text at Hayduck pp. 196–197. D0035 is frontmatter keywords and does not bear.", "lineage": "The SE epilogue separates Socrates from the paid eristic teachers, keyed to his confessed ignorance", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1585, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "D0039" ], "reason": "D0039 says what the Sophistical Refutations is and how it behaves: a catalogue of fallacies, a registry of practice (what sophists do in argument) as against Δ, a registry of terms, and it takes the W pole in every stylometric family. This is description, mechanism and measure. D0038 is an erratum about a misidentified file: it notes that the real SE is tlg040 (14,116 tokens), places it on the apparatus side (+2.1 / +4.3 / +2.6), and clarifies that earlier 'SE' results referred to De coloribus. That also bears on the entity but rests on the same deposit, so admission stands on D0039 (and D0038 as supporting). This version carries the earlier-numbered section 18.x and the v0.20 text.", "lineage": "SE is a catalogue of fallacies that registers what people do in argument (a registry of practice), and in stylometric runs it sits on the world-voice (W) pole; the TLG file mix-up (tlg007 vs tlg040) is corrected by erratum.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1586, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "D0041" ], "reason": "D0041 describes the Sophistical Refutations as a catalogue of fallacies, a registry of practice (the sophists' moves) rather than of terms, and reports it at the W pole in every family of the stylometric runs. D0040, the erratum, adds that the real SE (tlg040, 14,116 tokens) lies on the apparatus side. This version is the standalone paper (v0.7), with section references §7–7d.", "lineage": "SE is a catalogue of fallacies that registers what people do in argument (a registry of practice), and in stylometric runs it sits on the world-voice (W) pole; the TLG file mix-up (tlg007 vs tlg040) is corrected by erratum.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1589, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "D0043" ], "reason": "D0043 states that SE, a catalogue of fallacies, takes the W pole in every family and offers a reading of it as a registry of practice (the sophists' moves), set against Δ's registry of terms. D0042 is the repeated erratum placing the real SE (tlg040) on the apparatus side. This version is the notebook v0.21, which adds the maker-count test and otherwise repeats the v0.20 text.", "lineage": "SE is a catalogue of fallacies that registers what people do in argument (a registry of practice), and in stylometric runs it sits on the world-voice (W) pole; the TLG file mix-up (tlg007 vs tlg040) is corrected by erratum.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1594, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "D0046" ], "reason": "D0046 describes the Sophistical Refutations as a catalogue of fallacies and a registry of practice (the sophists' moves), which takes the W pole in every stylometric family, in contrast to Δ, a registry of terms. D0045 is the repeated erratum placing the real SE (tlg040) on the apparatus side. This version is the notebook v0.42, extended through the referee rounds and the stones.", "lineage": "SE is a catalogue of fallacies that registers what people do in argument (a registry of practice), and in stylometric runs it sits on the W pole; the TLG file mix-up (tlg007 vs tlg040) is corrected by erratum.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1603, "strata": [ "D", "O", "R" ], "cands": [ "D0051", "D0053", "D0054" ], "reason": "The deposit is a sustained argument about the ending of the Sophistical Refutations. D0051 states that the closing chapter denies anything of the inquiry existed before it (οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν), that the sentence means what it says, and that Socrates' place is dissolved by the treatise's own account of the peirastic. D0053 states that the treatise is about supplied qualifications and that a reader who supplies one at the close performs the operation the treatise teaches. These are description, mechanism and limit claims about the work itself. The front matter, title lines and the apparatus-to-do list are only mentions or bibliographic and are not relied on.", "lineage": "The Sophistical Refutations' closing boast is to be read literally, and the chapter functions as a final exercise in the supplied qualification that the treatise catalogues.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1605, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "D0056" ], "reason": "D0056 makes a claim about the work: the Sophistical Refutations, a catalogue of fallacies, takes the W pole of the first principal axis in every corpus family, sitting with the world-registries rather than with Δ. It offers the reading that SE registers what people do in argument, a registry of practice, as against Δ's registry of terms. That is a stylometric description and mechanism of the treatise. D0055 is only an erratum about misidentified file numbers (tlg007 mislabelled as SE, which was actually De coloribus). It says nothing about the work itself and is not relied on.", "lineage": "Stylometrically the Sophistical Refutations lies on the world pole of the first axis, as a registry of practice, not with the apparatus-side registry of terms.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1684, "strata": [ "D", "O", "R" ], "cands": [ "D0058", "D0060", "O0017", "R0010", "R0011" ], "reason": "The index page states claims about the Sophistical Refutations. #1570 and #1569 hold that the text closes, like the Theaetetus, on what individuates Socrates (D). #1574 and #1603 argue that its ending says nothing of syllogizing came before Aristotle and that the deleted particle at 183b34 is a provenance claim (D). The paragraph ties it to the archive's Socratic heteronymic field and to the thesis that Aristotle will not make Socrates a variable (R). The Particle, an archive coinage, is applied to the text's ending (O). The D0059 entry only lists a prediction-page title and adds nothing beyond this.", "lineage": "The Sophistical Refutations ends by dissolving Socrates as predecessor: the deleted particle at 183b34 is a provenance claim, and the closing count says nothing of syllogizing came before Aristotle.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1696, "strata": [ "D", "O", "R" ], "cands": [ "D0061", "O0018", "R0012" ], "reason": "The deposit reads SE 184b1-2 (\"about syllogizing we had absolutely nothing else earlier to say\") as a total negation over a stated domain, which the encyclopedia lead for 'Sophistical Refutations' turns into the attribute 'the first work to treat the subject of deductive reasoning', primacy (D). It also states the relation between the text and its encyclopedic reception (R) and applies the archive's own category of the entity/surface delivery to the text's reception (O). The section heading D0062 only announces the specimen. The source citation D0063 and the pricing specimen D0064 name the article only as a test input, and the bibliography entry D0065 is a reference list; none of these four bears on the entity, so they add nothing to the three bearing candidates. This version repeats the full reading of SE 184b1-2 at the encyclopedia surface.", "lineage": "The encyclopedia lead converts Aristotle's total negation at SE 184b1-2 (nothing earlier on syllogizing) into the attribute of primacy, the first work on deductive reasoning.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 1697, "strata": [ "D", "O", "R" ], "cands": [ "D0066", "D0068", "D0069", "D0070", "D0071", "O0019 (O-direct: first work)", "R0013 (R: surface)" ], "reason": "The paper's worked specimen (§6) treats the Wikipedia article 'Sophistical Refutations' and also says things about the work itself. D0066 states that the encyclopedia lead turns Aristotle's SE 184b1–2 count ('about syllogizing we had absolutely nothing else earlier to say') into the attribute 'first work to treat the subject of deductive reasoning.' D0069 describes how the work divides sophistical refutations into language-dependent and language-independent groups (Krabbe, Chapters 4–5). D0070 reports the work's own completeness claim (SE 8, 170a9–11) and its statement of programme (SE 34) against the article's rendering, a corrective on the entity. R: the paper relates the entity to the archive's operation of opening and translating encyclopedic grammar, in which the entry's surface delivers the entity and withholds the operation. Candidates D0067, D0068, D0071, D0072 and D0073 (heading, source hash, edit history, pricing specimen, bibliography) only name the article or use it as a specimen and are not the basis of this decision.", "lineage": "The encyclopedia article on Sophistical Refutations converts Aristotle's stated count and completeness claim into a bare attribute of primacy, and relabels the work's taxonomy and programme.", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/beautiful-and-new-second-letters.html", "strata": [ "R" ], "cands": [ "BG0005" ], "reason": "The passage is the page header, navigation and abstract. The abstract says the edition of Socrates at the Second Letter 314c is traced in its reception into Aristotle's epilogue (SE 34), and it names 'Sophistical Refutations' among its keywords. The paper is also a companion to 'Nothing Before Us (SE 34)'. This states a relation between the work and an archive object, a reception line from Plato's edition of Socrates into SE 34's epilogue. The passage says nothing definitional about the work, so D and O are not claimed. This reading rests on the abstract alone, since the body of the post is not in the candidate.", "lineage": "Plato's edited Socrates (Second Letter 314c) is received into Aristotle's epilogue at SE 34.", "marks": [ "extraction_contested" ], "readings": [ { "dep": "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/beautiful-and-new-second-letters.html", "admitted": false, "strata": [], "cands": [ "BG0005" ], "reason": "The only candidate is the page header, which lists 'Sophistical Refutations' among keyword tags. The visible abstract says the edition's reception is traced into Aristotle's epilogue (SE 34), which is the final chapter of the work, but it makes no claim about Sophistical Refutations as such and only uses SE 34 as a reception witness for the Platonic Socrates. The string appears as a tag, not as the subject of a bearing sentence.", "lineage": "none: tag-list mention within a paper about Plato's Second Letter." }, { "dep": "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/beautiful-and-new-second-letters.html", "admitted": true, "strata": [ "R" ], "cands": [ "BG0005" ], "reason": "The passage is the page header, navigation and abstract. The abstract says the edition of Socrates at the Second Letter 314c is traced in its reception into Aristotle's epilogue (SE 34), and it names 'Sophistical Refutations' among its keywords. The paper is also a companion to 'Nothing Before Us (SE 34)'. This states a relation between the work and an archive object, a reception line from Plato's edition of Socrates into SE 34's epilogue. The passage says nothing definitional about the work, so D and O are not claimed. This reading rests on the abstract alone, since the body of the post is not in the candidate.", "lineage": "Plato's edited Socrates (Second Letter 314c) is received into Aristotle's epilogue at SE 34." } ], "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/many-and-one-division-unity-and_0837457668.html", "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "BG0006", "BG0007" ], "reason": "The passages say something about the Sophistical Refutations: its ch. 34 (183b34–36) has Aristotle claiming that nothing of his Topics–Sophistical Refutations inquiry existed beforehand (οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν), and the paper sets this against Prior Analytics I.31, where division is called a part of that inquiry. This is a description and extension of the work's closing claim of priority, not a bare mention. This is the journal-article send-file version (v2.13-AP).", "lineage": "SE 34's claim that nothing of the inquiry existed beforehand is in tension with Prior Analytics I.31's treatment of division as part of that inquiry", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/nothing-before-us-socrates-and-ending_01825732653.html", "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "BG0003", "BG0004" ], "reason": "The deposit is wholly about the ending of the Sophistical Refutations. It states that Aristotle at SE 34 denies anything of his inquiry existed before it (οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν), reports how translators and commentators (the Arabic versions, the Byzantine paraphrast, Pickard-Cambridge, Forster, Poste) render and qualify that sentence, and argues that the closing chapter is built so the denial can be kept, dissolving Socrates as a received predecessor. This is a description, mechanism and corrective of the work's epilogue.", "lineage": "SE 34's denial that anything of the inquiry preexisted means what it says; the standard Socratic qualification is dissolved by the chapter's own construction", "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-particle-provenance-erasure-at.html", "strata": [ "D", "R" ], "cands": [ "BG0009", "BG0010", "BG0011" ], "reason": "The passage quotes and measures SE 34, 183b34–36, the claim that nothing at all had been worked out beforehand for this subject (οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν), a direct statement about the work's closing passage (D). It also states a relation of reception: twenty rounds of model review reproduce the discipline's own deletion of the negation οὐ, and SR 16 (175a10–12) is invoked as predicting that unperceived deletion. This ties the text to the archive's measurement of machine-mediated reception, the Capture Registry derivative (R).", "lineage": "SE 183b34–36 (οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν) is routinely read with its negation deleted; model reviewers reproduce this provenance erasure", "marks": [ "extraction_contested" ], "readings": [ { "dep": "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-particle-provenance-erasure-at.html", "admitted": true, "strata": [ "D", "R" ], "cands": [ "BG0009", "BG0010", "BG0011" ], "reason": "The passage quotes and measures SE 34, 183b34–36, the claim that nothing at all had been worked out beforehand for this subject (οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν), a direct statement about the work's closing passage (D). It also states a relation of reception: twenty rounds of model review reproduce the discipline's own deletion of the negation οὐ, and SR 16 (175a10–12) is invoked as predicting that unperceived deletion. This ties the text to the archive's measurement of machine-mediated reception, the Capture Registry derivative (R).", "lineage": "SE 183b34–36 (οὐδὲν παντελῶς ὑπῆρχεν) is routinely read with its negation deleted; model reviewers reproduce this provenance erasure" }, null ], "read_as": "whole" }, { "dep": 123, "strata": [ "R" ], "cands": [ "H0091.c3", "H0091.c3 (H-cited-by #1684, names (in its paragraph))" ], "reason": "reached by the hop (H0091). The cited sentence, quoted within the citing paragraph of deposit 1684, states that the Socratic archive is read as a heteronymic field and that the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations 'both close on what individuates Socrates'. That is a relation between the work and an archive object (the Socratic heteronymic field): the Sophistical Refutations is placed inside the archive's Socratic configuration. The claim is made in the citing paragraph, and the H-cite candidate is the bearing passage.", "lineage": "Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations and the Theaetetus close on what individuates Socrates, placing the work within the archive's Socratic heteronymic configuration", "via": { "cand_id": "H0091", "direction": "forward", "via_admitted": [ 1684 ] } }, { "dep": 1569, "strata": [ "R" ], "cands": [ "H0755.1", "H0755.22", "H0755.29", "H0755.30", "H0755.31", "H0755.32", "H0755.53", "H0755.c57", "H0755.c58", "H0755.c59", "H0755.c60", "H0755.c61" ], "reason": "reached by the hop (H0755). The passages state that the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations 'both close on what individuates Socrates', and that Aristotle will not make Socrates a variable. This is a relation between the work and an archive object (the Socratic archive and Aristotle's treatment of Socrates) and does not merely name or list the text. The paragraph is a citing paragraph of deposit 1576 and states the claim in a relational frame, so the deposit is admitted under R. The Sophistical Refutations is named as a text that closes on individuation, which is a claim about the work, not a homonym.", "lineage": "Socrates is the individual Aristotle will not make a variable; the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations both close on what individuates Socrates.", "marks": [ "extraction_contested" ], "readings": [ { "dep": 1569, "admitted": false, "strata": [], "cands": [ "H0755.c58", "H0755.c57", "H0755.c59", "H0755.c60", "H0755.c61", "H0755.1", "H0755.22", "H0755.29", "H0755.30", "H0755.31", "H0755.32", "H0755.53" ], "reason": "The passages name Socrates and mention the Sophistical Refutations as a closing text in a research notebook's claims about Socrates' individuation and the Socratic archive, but none states a claim about the entity Sophistical Refutations itself. The passages that do mention the Sophistical Refutations (H0755.c58-c61) list it among other texts without predicating anything of it, and the remaining passages concern Phaedrus, Theaetetus, Phaedo, Parmenides, Meno, Sophist, Symposium and Socratic quotations. No direct, relational or ontological claim about the entity is made.", "lineage": "Socrates as the individual that resists variation and the Socratic archive as heteronymic field, with the Sophistical Refutations appearing only as a text Socrates' individuation is said to close." }, { "dep": 1569, "admitted": true, "strata": [ "R" ], "cands": [ "H0755.c58", "H0755.c57", "H0755.c59", "H0755.c60", "H0755.c61" ], "reason": "The passages state that the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations 'both close on what individuates Socrates', and that Aristotle will not make Socrates a variable. This is a relation between the work and an archive object (the Socratic archive and Aristotle's treatment of Socrates) and does not merely name or list the text. The paragraph is a citing paragraph of deposit 1576 and states the claim in a relational frame, so the deposit is admitted under R. The Sophistical Refutations is named as a text that closes on individuation, which is a claim about the work, not a homonym.", "lineage": "Socrates is the individual Aristotle will not make a variable; the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations both close on what individuates Socrates." } ], "via": { "cand_id": "H0755", "direction": "forward", "via_admitted": [ 1574, 1576, 1684 ] } }, { "dep": 1570, "strata": [ "R" ], "cands": [ "H0756.1", "H0756.10", "H0756.11", "H0756.12", "H0756.3", "H0756.5", "H0756.6", "H0756.8", "H0756.c20", "H0756.c21", "H0756.c22", "H0756.c23" ], "reason": "reached by the hop (H0756). The passage restates the same claim as deposit 1569: that the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations both close on what individuates Socrates, attributed to the measurement register. This is a relation between the Sophistical Refutations and the Socratic archive object, stated in the citing paragraph of 1576. The admitted sentence is the bearing one; the other passages on Plato's poets and the Poetics do not concern this entity.", "lineage": "Socrates is the individual Aristotle will not make a variable; the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations both close on what individuates Socrates.", "marks": [ "extraction_contested" ], "readings": [ { "dep": 1570, "admitted": false, "strata": [], "cands": [ "H0756.c21", "H0756.c20", "H0756.c22", "H0756.c23", "H0756.1", "H0756.3", "H0756.5", "H0756.6", "H0756.8", "H0756.10", "H0756.11", "H0756.12" ], "reason": "The measurement register reports stylometric results on Plato and Aristotle corpora. Passages mentioning the Sophistical Refutations (H0756.c20-c23, H0756.11) only name it as a text the register's analysis touches or as one item in a list of logic texts; no sentence makes a claim about the Sophistical Refutations as an entity. The quoted Greek (H0756.3, .5, .6, .8) concerns the author's own preface and rhetoric/syllogizing, not the entity. Other passages concern Symposium speeches and ethics versus logic dispersion without predicating anything of the text.", "lineage": "Stylometric measurement of Plato and Aristotle, with function-word dispersion and object-conditioning as the methods, reporting that the Symposium speeches and Aristotelian logic corpus vary by subject matter rather than by author." }, { "dep": 1570, "admitted": true, "strata": [ "R" ], "cands": [ "H0756.c21", "H0756.c20", "H0756.c22", "H0756.c23" ], "reason": "The passage restates the same claim as deposit 1569: that the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations both close on what individuates Socrates, attributed to the measurement register. This is a relation between the Sophistical Refutations and the Socratic archive object, stated in the citing paragraph of 1576. The admitted sentence is the bearing one; the other passages on Plato's poets and the Poetics do not concern this entity.", "lineage": "Socrates is the individual Aristotle will not make a variable; the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations both close on what individuates Socrates." } ], "via": { "cand_id": "H0756", "direction": "forward", "via_admitted": [ 1574, 1576, 1684 ] } }, { "dep": 1575, "strata": [ "D", "R" ], "cands": [ "H0760.27", "H0760.31", "H0760.55", "H0760.63", "H0760.64", "H0760.7", "H0760.c71", "H0760.c72" ], "reason": "reached by the hop (H0760, H0761). Passage names Sophistical Refutations only as a text the reading copy's citation pass checks (the Greek of SE 34 and related loci), and the paragraph treats the Greek of the treatise as evidence in an argument about corpus division. The bearing sentences state a relation between the Sophistical Refutations and the archive's argument about Aristotle's corpus, which is R-kind. Note: this is an admission of a relational claim about the text as an archive object, not a direct description of the entity.", "lineage": "The Sophistical Refutations' Greek passages function as citation evidence for the archive's account of the Platonic-Aristotelian corpus boundary.", "via": { "cand_id": "H0760, H0761", "direction": "forward, reverse", "via_admitted": [ 1576, 1684, 1574 ] } }, { "dep": 1587, "strata": [ "D", "R" ], "cands": [ "H0769.1 (H-cites)", "H0769.10 (H-cites)", "H0769.2 (H-cites)", "H0769.3 (H-cites)", "H0769.4 (H-cites)", "H0769.5 (H-cites)", "H0769.6 (H-cites)", "H0769.7 (H-cites)", "H0769.8 (H-cites)", "H0769.9 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "reached by the hop (H0769, H0770). The deposit is a methodological packet about the authorship of the Aristotelian and Theophrastan corpora; it does not mention the Sophistical Refutations (SE) by name in any bearing passage, and its candidate passages concern the Metaphysics, Politics, Athenaion Politeia, Characters, and biological works. Its only contact with the entity is through the open-texts note, where SE is cited as tlg040 in a list of files used for stylometric analysis, which is an inventory listing and does not bear. The passages that bear on the entity's Aristotelian authorship are therefore not present in the candidates shown; none of the cited candidates is a claim about SE, and no D or R claim about the Sophistical Refutations is made. Admission is not supported on the candidates given.", "lineage": "Aristotle and Theophrastus are not two distinct authors; corpus names as indices of operations rather than persons.", "marks": [ "extraction_contested" ], "readings": [ { "dep": 1587, "admitted": false, "strata": [], "cands": [], "reason": "The deposit is a methodological packet about the authorship of the Aristotelian and Theophrastan corpora. Its only uses of the name-string are inside its own argument for other entities (Aristotle, Theophrastus, Metaphysics Λ, the Athenaion Politeia, the Characters). None of its passages states anything about Sophistical Refutations: it does not mention the Sophistici Elenchi, the twelve or thirteen fallacies, the Organon, or any sophistical or refutation topic. The citing-paragraph and sentence matches for H0769 do not concern this entity. The deposit does not bear on the entity and is not admitted.", "lineage": "Aristotle and Theophrastus are not two distinct authors: stylometric and operational evidence for a single authorial configuration across the two corpora" }, { "dep": 1587, "admitted": true, "strata": [ "D", "R" ], "cands": [ "H0769.1 (H-cites)", "H0769.2 (H-cites)", "H0769.3 (H-cites)", "H0769.4 (H-cites)", "H0769.5 (H-cites)", "H0769.6 (H-cites)", "H0769.7 (H-cites)", "H0769.8 (H-cites)", "H0769.9 (H-cites)", "H0769.10 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The deposit is a methodological packet about the authorship of the Aristotelian and Theophrastan corpora; it does not mention the Sophistical Refutations (SE) by name in any bearing passage, and its candidate passages concern the Metaphysics, Politics, Athenaion Politeia, Characters, and biological works. Its only contact with the entity is through the open-texts note, where SE is cited as tlg040 in a list of files used for stylometric analysis, which is an inventory listing and does not bear. The passages that bear on the entity's Aristotelian authorship are therefore not present in the candidates shown; none of the cited candidates is a claim about SE, and no D or R claim about the Sophistical Refutations is made. Admission is not supported on the candidates given.", "lineage": "Aristotle and Theophrastus are not two distinct authors; corpus names as indices of operations rather than persons.", "_note": "Corrected: the deposit does not bear on the Sophistical Refutations as an entity." } ], "via": { "cand_id": "H0769, H0770", "direction": "forward, reverse", "via_admitted": [ 1594, 1605, 1684, 1696, 1697, 1574, 1576, 1585, 1586 ] } }, { "dep": 1590, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "H0773.1", "H0773.2" ], "reason": "reached by the hop (H0773, H0774). The passage discusses the Sophistical Refutations' catalogue entry in the Thrasyllan/Diogenes Laertius catalogue of Aristotle's works, where the title is an object of the transform being analysed, and it characterises the title's relation to the list. It is a direct treatment of the entity as a catalogue item and its treatment within the transform, not merely a mention used as an example.", "lineage": "Ancient catalogue ghost-titles: the Thrasyllan catalogue of Aristotle's works is read as presupposing and transforming the Platonic dialogue catalogue, with the Sophistical Refutations appearing among the transform's outputs.", "marks": [ "extraction_contested" ], "readings": [ { "dep": 1590, "admitted": false, "strata": [], "cands": [ "H0773.1", "H0773.2" ], "reason": "The entity is named only as a catalogue entry (Thrasyllus's/Aristotle's list of titles) and as a title subject being transformed; the passages use the Sophistical Refutations title only as an item in a list or example and do not state any claim about the text itself (definition, description, mechanism, etc.). No bearing sentence.", "lineage": "Ghost-catalogue transform of Aristotelian/Theophrastean titles; the Sophistical Refutations appears only as a catalogue entry." }, { "dep": 1590, "admitted": true, "strata": [ "D" ], "cands": [ "H0773.1", "H0773.2" ], "reason": "The passage discusses the Sophistical Refutations' catalogue entry in the Thrasyllan/Diogenes Laertius catalogue of Aristotle's works, where the title is an object of the transform being analysed, and it characterises the title's relation to the list. It is a direct treatment of the entity as a catalogue item and its treatment within the transform, not merely a mention used as an example.", "lineage": "Ancient catalogue ghost-titles: the Thrasyllan catalogue of Aristotle's works is read as presupposing and transforming the Platonic dialogue catalogue, with the Sophistical Refutations appearing among the transform's outputs." } ], "via": { "cand_id": "H0773, H0774", "direction": "forward, reverse", "via_admitted": [ 1594, 1605, 1684, 1696, 1697, 1574, 1586 ] } } ], "not_admitted": [ { "dep": [ 1570 ], "cands": [ "D0001" ], "reason": "The sentence lists 'sophistical refutations' as one of several topics (categories, interpretation, analytics) that Aristotle's logic ranges over, as part of an argument about the internal object-space of the logic group of texts. It says nothing about the Sophistical Refutations as a text (no definition, description, mechanism or limit), and the string appears only as a topic label inside a list. The O candidate does not apply any archive-defined category to the entity; 'one object' there describes ethics. Mention only." }, { "dep": [ 1572 ], "cands": [ "D0002" ], "reason": "This is the same sentence as in dep 1570 (the version of the argument at point 11 of the technical report): logic 'ranges over categories, interpretation, analytics and sophistical refutations.' The entity appears only as one item in a list used to characterise the widest internal object-space of the logic domain, and the passage says nothing about the text itself. No archive category is applied to it. The mention is incidental, so it does not bear on any stratum." }, { "dep": [ 1575 ], "cands": [], "reason": "No candidate passage is listed under this deposit id, so there is nothing to read and no bearing claim to rest an admission on." }, { "dep": [ 1593 ], "cands": [ "D0044" ], "reason": "D0044 mentions the Sophistical Refutations only as one half of a file-identity error in a public repository: De coloribus was filed as the Sophistical Refutations. It says nothing about the work itself; the title is an example in a methodological warning about verifying file identity, so the passage does not bear on the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1611 ], "cands": [ "D0057" ], "reason": "D0057 only lists 'Sophistical Refutations 183b34' among the general concepts c on which the archive makes claims. The entity appears as one item in a list of examples within a formal model of entity-scoped representation, and the passage says nothing about the treatise itself. It is a mention, not a bearing claim." }, { "dep": [ "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/many-and-one-reading-copy-ea-many-and.html" ], "cands": [ "BG0008" ], "reason": "The only candidate passage lists 'Sophistical Refutations 34' among keywords and describes the deposit as the research machine from which the article was cut. It makes no claim about the Sophistical Refutations itself. The reading copy's later text may repeat the SE 34 tension, but the supplied passage does not bear. This is the reading-copy version (v2.5.1) of the same work as the journal article, and unlike that version its supplied passage carries no bearing sentence." }, { "dep": [ "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-negative-of-negative-entity-scoped.html" ], "cands": [ "BG0001", "BG0002" ], "reason": "'Sophistical Refutations 183b34' appears only as one item in a keyword list and in a list of general concepts the archive touches (operative semiotics, Sappho 31, model collapse, the LHC trigger, the content-derived identifier). The notebook's claims concern entity-scoped representation, not the work. It is listed as an example of a concept, with no statement about the Sophistical Refutations itself." }, { "dep": [ "blog:https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-notebook-of-authorship.html" ], "cands": [ "BG0012" ], "reason": "The only passage lists 'Sophistical Refutations 34' among the keyword tags of the notebook and describes an investigation into the relation between the Platonic and Aristotelian corpora. It says nothing about the work itself and states no relation between it and an archive object; it is a mention in a keyword string, not a claim of D, R or O kind." }, { "dep": [ 3 ], "cands": [ "H0002.10 (H-cites)", "H0002.11 (H-cites)", "H0002.12 (H-cites)", "H0002.13 (H-cites)", "H0002.14 (H-cites)", "H0002.15 (H-cites)", "H0002.20 (H-cites)", "H0002.3 (H-cites)", "H0002.4 (H-cites)", "H0002.5 (H-cites)", "H0002.6 (H-cites)", "H0002.9 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The passages name no entity 'Sophistical Refutations'. Where the Aristotelian work appears in the text, it is only in the listing of the archive's own deposits and dates. The only reference to a text in the Organon-sense is the citation of the Theaetetus and the Sophistical Refutations as closing on what individuates Socrates, and that sentence belongs to deposit 123's citing paragraph, not to deposit 3. Nothing in deposit 3 says anything about the work's content, mechanism, extension, or relation." }, { "dep": [ 136 ], "cands": [ "H0099.1 (H-shares aristophanes, clouds)", "H0099.2 (H-shares aristophanes, clouds)", "H0099.3 (H-shares aristophanes, clouds)", "H0099.4 (H-shares aristophanes, clouds)", "H0099.5 (H-shares aristophanes, clouds)" ], "reason": "The passages concern Chaerephon, Socrates, Aristophanes' Clouds, and the Suda's entries on Chaerephon. None mention the Sophistical Refutations, Aristotle's sophistical fallacies, or the Aristotelian work of that name. The word 'Sophistical' does not occur in the bearing passages, and the entity is not named." }, { "dep": [ 137 ], "cands": [ "H0100.c1", "H0100.c2" ], "reason": "The only passages naming 'Sophistical Refutations' are a citing paragraph of #1696 and of #1697, which list the work among related_ids and in an implementation-context frontmatter. Neither says anything about the entity; it is an identifier in a citation list, so no stratum is borne." }, { "dep": [ 511 ], "cands": [ "H0305.1", "H0305.2" ], "reason": "The candidate passages are Greek verse from the Lasus fragment (Demeter/Kore hymn) and do not contain the entity name 'Sophistical Refutations'. The shared tokens (αλλ, παντα) are lexical coincidence, not a reference to the entity or to the Aristotelian text." }, { "dep": [ 716 ], "cands": [ "H0426.c1", "H0426.c2" ], "reason": "The passage names 'sophistical-refutations' only as a row-status label in an audit log ('non=sophistical-refutations not composed', 'composed from_ledger=true'). It uses the string as a field value in a tool output and makes no claim about the Aristotelian work, so it does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 740 ], "cands": [ "H0441.c1", "H0441.c2" ], "reason": "The same audit-log passage as dep 716 appears, with 'non=sophistical-refutations' as a row label. It names the string as a token in a ledger and says nothing about the entity; not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 944 ], "cands": [ "H0547.c1" ], "reason": "The candidate passage concerns Nothing Before Us, Ross and Dorion, and nearby claims; it does not name 'Sophistical Refutations' at all. The shared tokens (dorion, clouds) are unrelated to the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1101 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The deposit is a treatise on the Book of Revelation as a 'Space Ark.' The candidate passages are Greek text of Revelation (Apocalypse) quoted as apparatus. None of them names or says anything about Sophistical Refutations, the Aristotelian text on fallacies, so there is no direct, relational, or ontological claim about the entity. The passages are not mentions of Sophistical Refutations at all, and nothing in them is a homonym either. The deposit does not bear on the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1261 ], "cands": [ "H0634.1", "H0634.2", "H0634.3", "H0634.4", "H0634.c5" ], "reason": "The passage names Socrates, Aristotle and Plato; it does not mention Sophistical Refutations as an entity beyond a citing paragraph that lists it among texts that close on what individuates Socrates. That is a passing mention in a list of claims about other entities, not a claim about the Sophistical Refutations' fallacies, content or status. Not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1327 ], "cands": [ "H0646.c1" ], "reason": "The citing paragraph mentions the Sophistical Refutations only as one text that closes on what individuates Socrates, in a sentence about Theaetetus and the archive's heteronymic reading. No claim about the work's content, mechanism or relation to an archive object is made of it. Passing reference only; not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1458 ], "cands": [ "H0690.1", "H0690.2", "H0690.3" ], "reason": "The passages concern Peri Hypsous (Longinus) and Philo's De Specialibus Legibus; the Sophistical Refutations does not appear in the candidate sentences or the cited paragraphs. Not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1474 ], "cands": [ "H0703.c1" ], "reason": "The citing paragraph lists sources and open edges across many unrelated entities; the Sophistical Refutations is not named or discussed. Not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1486 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The deposit concerns Sappho 31 and Philo of Alexandria's Quis rerum divinarum heres sit; it does not name Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations or make any claim about that text. The candidate passages are Philo's Greek, which concern prophetic ecstasy and do not mention the Sophistical Refutations entity; nothing bears on the homonym or the Aristotelian work." }, { "dep": [ 1532 ], "cands": [ "H0730.1" ], "reason": "The passage is a front-matter/metadata block for a paper on Sappho 31 reception. It contains no statement about Sophistical Refutations; the candidate is only a hop-marker (H-shares phaedrus, aristophanes) with no sentence about the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1538 ], "cands": [ "H0735.c1" ], "reason": "The cited paragraph is a list of claims and falsifiers on unrelated topics (Zenodo moderation, Arendt, vpcor.org). Sophistical Refutations is not named or characterized; the candidate is a cited-by hop with no bearing sentence about the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1543 ], "cands": [ "H0739.c1" ], "reason": "The passage is the same citing-paragraph text as dep 1538, concerning generative uptake and open edges in unrelated archive deposits. It contains no claim about Sophistical Refutations." }, { "dep": [ 1546 ], "cands": [ "H0741.c1" ], "reason": "The only sentence is a sister-paper pointer ('Sister to EA-MMRS-SUPPRESSION-INVERSION-01'). It does not name Sophistical Refutations or make any claim about it." }, { "dep": [ 1552 ], "cands": [ "H0746.c1" ], "reason": "The only sentence is the same sister-paper pointer as dep 1546 and does not reference Sophistical Refutations; no claim about the entity is made." }, { "dep": [ 1571 ], "cands": [ "H0757.1", "H0757.2", "H0757.3", "H0757.4", "H0757.5", "H0757.6", "H0757.7", "H0757.8", "H0757.c10", "H0757.c9" ], "reason": "The passages concern a pre-registration ledger for an authorship investigation of Plato and Aristotle. They name Aristotle's Organon only as a corpus under measurement, and 'Sophistical Refutations' appears only as a section label in a Method/corpus description (H0757.3 and H0757.8 are not about the Sophistical Refutations). No passage says anything about the text as an entity; the Aristotelian works are referred to as objects of measurement, not as the entity described. The term does not name this encyclopedia subject as its subject matter in any bearing sentence." }, { "dep": [ 1572 ], "cands": [ "H0758.1", "H0758.2", "H0758.3", "H0758.4", "H0758.5", "H0758.6", "H0758.7", "H0758.8" ], "reason": "The report is a functional comparison of Platonic and Aristotelian corpora and methods for measuring maker-count. Its only contact with the entity is H0758.3, where 'sophistical refutations' is listed as one of four subject domains of Aristotle's logic that account for internal dispersion. That is a mention within a list used to characterise a domain, not a claim about the Sophistical Refutations as such; the passage does not describe, define, measure, or predict anything about the text. No stratum is met." }, { "dep": [ 1580 ], "cands": [ "H0762.1", "H0762.2", "H0762.3", "H0762.4", "H0762.5" ], "reason": "The deposit is a dataset seating transmission texts (Plutarch, Athenaeus, Aelian, the Anonymous paraphrast of the Elenchi, Michael of Ephesus, Albert, Giles of Rome, Plato's Epistles) and Aristotle's will (Wills and clauses are quoted in candidate passages). Sophistical Refutations is named only as an item in the seated corpus of the paraphrast's CAG XXIII.4 scan and in the collation list; nothing is said about the Elenchi itself: no definition, description, mechanism, corrective, or prediction, and no relation to an archive object. The mention is a listed shelf item, not a claim about the entity. The candidate passages do not make a claim about the Sophistical Refutations." }, { "dep": [ 1581 ], "cands": [ "H0763.1", "H0763.2", "H0763.3", "H0763.c4", "H0763.c5", "H0763.c6", "H0763.c7" ], "reason": "The note concerns the Peripatetic wills and catalogues (Aristotle, Theophrastus, Strato, Lycon) and the Strabo/Diogenes transmission texts. The Sophistical Refutations appears only as a catalogue-adjacent title; the catalogue citation names Ὑπομνημάτων Ἀριστοτελικῶν ἢ Θεοφραστείων and Ἐπιτομῶν Ἀριστοτέλους περὶ ζῴων, not the Elenchi. The candidate passages do not state a claim about the Sophistical Refutations. The entity is not named in any bearing passage." }, { "dep": [ 1582 ], "cands": [ "H0764.1 (H-shares τους, collation)" ], "reason": "The passages concern the Delphic stone recording Aristotle and Callisthenes as compilers of a victors' table for the Pythian games, and the Lyceum's πίναξ. They do not name or say anything about the Sophistical Refutations text. The entity's string does not appear as a subject of any claim here, and the deposit's stone-and-registry argument does not reach the treatise." }, { "dep": [ 1583 ], "cands": [ "H0765.c13 (H-cited-by #1594, shares τουτο, σωκρατης, ηρωτα, προεξειργασμενον (in its paragraph))", "H0765.c7 (H-cited-by #1585, shares ειδως, epilogue, peirastic (in its paragraph))" ], "reason": "The passages discuss Theophrastus's Metaphysics fragment, Aristotle's Λ, the authorship question of the Aristotle–Theophrastus seam, and Socrates's place in the undertaking. The Sophistical Refutations is cited only in the table of headings and in general discussion of the Organon. No passage makes a claim about the Sophistical Refutations as a text, so nothing is admitted to any stratum." }, { "dep": [ 1584 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The deposit is a theoretical paper on Theophrastus's Characters and never names Sophistical Refutations as a subject. Its passages concern the Characters, the Organon as a general architecture, and the Apology, with the Organon and Aristotelian architecture appearing only in a table as a function-mode grid. None of the candidate passages states a claim about Sophistical Refutations, so no stratum is borne." }, { "dep": [ 1588 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The packet concerns the authorship of the Aristotelian and Theophrastan corpora (Aristotle and Theophrastus as two authors, stylometric clustering, Metaphysics Λ, Athenaion Politeia, Characters, Diogenes Laertius's catalogue). The string 'Sophistical Refutations' and the Organon text it names appear nowhere in the passages, so no sentence describes, relates, or applies a category to that entity. Its single candidate-bearing sentence listing deposits is not about the entity. Not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1593 ], "cands": [ "H0775.1" ], "reason": "The passage notes that De coloribus was misfiled as the Sophistical Refutations in a repository. This is a mention of the entity's identifier used as an example of a file-identity error, not a claim about the Sophistical Refutations text." }, { "dep": [ 1597 ], "cands": [ "H0779.1", "H0779.2" ], "reason": "The passage is Greek text from Theophrastus/Aristotle Metaphysics material on first principles; it does not name or state anything about the Sophistical Refutations. No bearing sentence." }, { "dep": [ 1601 ], "cands": [ "H0782.1" ], "reason": "The passage concerns museum reconstruction and Latour's circulating reference; it does not mention the Sophistical Refutations." }, { "dep": [ 1611 ], "cands": [ "H0791.1", "H0791.1 (H-cites)", "H0791.2", "H0791.2 (H-cites)", "H0791.3", "H0791.3 (H-names)", "H0791.4", "H0791.4 (H-cites)", "H0791.5", "H0791.5 (H-cites)", "H0791.6", "H0791.6 (H-cites)", "H0791.7", "H0791.7 (H-cites)", "H0791.8", "H0791.8 (H-shares s0, w1)" ], "reason": "The deposit is a working notebook on the archive's own negative-ontology model and a toy cost model; no candidate passage makes a claim about the Sophistical Refutations (Aristotle's Organon text). The only mention is the citing paragraph of #1684, which refers to #1574 and #1603 on Sophistical Refutations 183b34 and the Socrates-as-predecessor thesis, and cites #1611 only as compressing the thesis from #1603. That is a relation to other deposits, not a claim about the entity by this deposit. Other candidates use 'concept' and 'Sappho 31' examples without naming the entity. Not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1613 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The only candidates are H0794.c1 and H0794.c2, which come from the citing paragraph of #1696 (the Wikipedia-translation paper). That paragraph concerns an 'entity as ontological commodity form' and an SPXI-gnΩsis service. It does not name or make any claim about Sophistical Refutations (Aristotle's text on fallacies). The entity is not the subject of any sentence in the passage; the hop is a citation-network link, not a statement about the entity. No D, R or O claim bears on the entity, so the deposit is not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1617 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The candidates H0797.c1 and H0797.c2 are drawn from the citing paragraph of #1696, which discusses the 'entity as ontological commodity form' and a Wikipedia translation protocol. Sophistical Refutations is not named or characterised in that passage, and no sentence makes a claim of direct, relational or ontological kind about the Aristotelian text. The hop is only a citation link; the deposit does not bear on the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1618 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The candidates H0798.c1 and H0798.c2 come from the citing paragraph of #1696 (entity as ontological commodity form; Wikipedia translation protocol). The passage does not name Sophistical Refutations or state any relation, definition or ontological application to it. The deposit's own subject (money as semantic value translation) is unrelated to Aristotle's fallacy treatise. Not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1625 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The candidates H0805.c1 and H0805.c2 are drawn from the citing paragraph of #1696 (entity as commodity form; translation protocol). Sophistical Refutations is not named or discussed there, and no sentence applies a claim to the entity. The deposit concerns money as a transmission device and is unrelated to Aristotle's text. The hop is a citation link only; not admitted." }, { "dep": [ 1629 ], "cands": [ "H0809.c1", "H0809.c2", "H0809.c3", "H0809.c4" ], "reason": "The passage concerns the AIO retrieval layer and an unrelated act. The only occurrence of the entity's sense is the 'Aristotle's count at SE 184b1–2' example, which discusses the Sophistical Refutations text by way of an example about the attribute 'first work to treat deductive reasoning' in an encyclopedia lead. This is a passage about how encyclopedia leads state attributes, using the entity as an example, not a claim about the entity's content, relation or category; it does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1631 ], "cands": [ "H0811.c1", "H0811.c2", "H0811.c3" ], "reason": "The passages concern the monetary dark matter paper, the encyclopedia-opening protocol and a source-attribution list. None states a claim about Sophistical Refutations (Aristotle's Organon text on fallacies), its contents, its relation to an archive object, or application of an archive category to it. No bearing sentence about the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1634 ], "cands": [ "H0814.c1", "H0814.c2" ], "reason": "The passages describe the Ontological Economy paper and an encyclopedia-opening protocol concerning entities as ontological commodity forms. They name no Sophistical Refutations content; the entity is not the subject of any claim here, and the 'entity' in question is the general category, not the Aristotelian text. Does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1637 ], "cands": [ "H0816.c1" ], "reason": "The passage concerns falsifiers and open edges in unrelated deposits (generative uptake, the Mandala inscription book, Zenodo moderation). It does not mention Sophistical Refutations. Does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1648 ], "cands": [ "H0821.1" ], "reason": "The passage is a conformance test for discernment with cases including a corpus-level reconstruction of the Aristotle/Theophrastus line. It mentions Aristotle but not Sophistical Refutations, and does not state a claim about that text. Does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1654 ], "cands": [ "H0827.1" ], "reason": "Same passage as dep 1648 (v0.3 of the same work): a conformance test case set including the Aristotle/Theophrastus line. No claim about Sophistical Refutations. Does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1658 ], "cands": [ "H0831.13 (H-cites)", "H0831.14 (H-cites)", "H0831.15 (H-cites)", "H0831.16 (H-cites)", "H0831.17 (H-cites)", "H0831.19 (H-cites)", "H0831.2 (H-cites)", "H0831.20 (H-cites)", "H0831.21 (H-cites)", "H0831.25 (H-cites)", "H0831.26 (H-cites)", "H0831.5 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The deposit is a paper on De anima III.5, the active intellect and the divided mind, and Theophrastus and Aristotle authorship within the archive. Its passages never name or describe Sophistical Refutations (the Sophistici Elenchi of the Organon). The only overlap is the shared Aristotelian corpus and the word 'syllogizing' in the title, which concerns a different text and a different subject; no sentence makes a claim about the entity, a relation between it and an archive object, or applies an archive category to it. Candidate passages are about other works and do not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1664 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The deposit is a specification for composing public knowledge about model collapse. Its candidate passages cite archive deposits (#855, #783, #1556, #1573, #856, #161, #939 and others) and discuss model collapse, provenance and the public-knowledge composition method. None of the candidate sentences names or makes a claim about 'Sophistical Refutations' (Aristotle's text on fallacies). The entity string does not appear in the passages, so there is no direct claim, no relational claim with an archive object about the entity, and no ontological application of an archive category to it. The deposit does not bear on the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1665 ], "cands": [ "H0836.1 (H-cites)", "H0836.2 (H-cites)", "H0836.3 (H-cites)", "H0836.4 (H-cites)", "H0836.5 (H-cites)", "H0836.6 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The passages concern model collapse, classifier and corpus citations, and a compositional method for public knowledge. None names Sophistical Refutations or says anything about it: no definition, description, relation to an archive object, or application of an archive category to it. The Aristotelian text appears nowhere in the candidate passages, so the entity is not bearing in this deposit." }, { "dep": [ 1667 ], "cands": [], "reason": "Passages are Theophrastus's On First Principles and Metaphysics Λ (Aristotle), with editorial apparatus. None names Sophistical Refutations or says anything about it: no definition, mechanism, relation or categorical application to that entity. The homonym question does not arise because the work is not mentioned at all. Does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1668 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The only candidate passage is a page-level note listing sources owed (Russell, Mazzucchi, Halliwell, Ellis, Ross, Dorion, MEGA² II/6) and linking other records. Sophistical Refutations is not named and is not the subject of any claim. Does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1669 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The only candidate passage is a page-level note listing sources owed and linking other records, with no mention of Sophistical Refutations. Does not bear." }, { "dep": [ 1671 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The passages mention the Theophrastus line and an Aristotle/Theophrastus packet, but nothing in the candidate text says anything about the Wikipedia entity Sophistical Refutations (Aristotle's text on fallacies). The archive's 'Aristotle' material concerns the Aristotle-position in the Theophrastus corpus, not this work. No direct, relational or ontological bearing on the entity; no homonym claim either, since the deposit is about a different subject entirely." }, { "dep": [ 1679 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The mantle object concerns the arch-philosopher and the dialectic and its carriers; the candidate passage names Marx, The Final Time, Operative Semiotics and the Theophrastus line. It contains no sentence making a claim about Sophistical Refutations, Aristotle's fallacy treatise, or its fallacies. Aristotle is not named in the passage as a bearer of this work." }, { "dep": [ 1680 ], "cands": [ "H0850.1 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The passages are a table of entry loci and mediations for the Living Academy mantle. Nothing in the candidate sentences names Sophistical Refutations or says anything about it, so it does not bear on the entity. The candidate H0850.1 is a reverse hop from admitted deposits and does not supply a claim about the Aristotelian text." }, { "dep": [ 1681 ], "cands": [ "H0851.1 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The passage concerns conformance tests for discernment across AEO, Prince of Poets, the Aristotle/Theophrastus corpus line and Tiger Leap. It does not mention Sophistical Refutations, Aristotle's Organon or the fallacies, so it does not bear on the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1687 ], "cands": [ "H0853.1 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The passages are rows of a seat-map table locating records in archive rooms (Hexagonal Licensing Protocol, Rhys Owens, EA-PREDICTION-INDEX-01, OpenAIRE correspondence, EA-MPAI-SPXI-03). None mentions Sophistical Refutations or any of its content, so it does not bear on the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1690 ], "cands": [ "H0854.1", "H0854.2", "H0854.3", "H0854.4", "H0854.5", "H0854.6", "H0854.7", "H0854.8" ], "reason": "The deposit's passages concern the archive's own specification, its method for composing sources, and its treatment of Theophrastus, Howl and SPXI. None states a claim about Sophistical Refutations (Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi); the entity's string is absent from every candidate sentence and paragraph. No passage bears on the entity." }, { "dep": [ 1694 ], "cands": [], "reason": "The passages in this deposit do not name or say anything about the entity 'Sophistical Refutations' as a text of Aristotle's Organon. The only candidate sentences that mention the string are fragments of the deposit's own metadata and related_ids list (a cross-reference to the sophistical refutations of the rubric/recalculation, a shared-word hit on 'sophistical' and 'refutations'), and a reader-log fragment that records 'sophistical-refutations not composed' and 'sophistical-refutations composed from_ledger=true'. These use the string as a label in a computational log, not as a claim about the Aristotelian text. The cited hop-passages (H0856 c1–c4) appear only as paragraph context of deposits #1696 and #1697 and do not themselves state a claim about the entity. No direct, relational, or ontological claim about the entity is made in this deposit." }, { "dep": [ 1701 ], "cands": [ "H0858.1 (H-cites)", "H0858.2 (H-cites)", "H0858.3 (H-cites)", "H0858.4 (H-cites)", "H0858.5 (H-cites)", "H0858.6 (H-cites)", "H0858.7 (H-cites)", "H0858.8 (H-cites)", "H0858.9 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The deposit is a metadata packet about the leesharks Hugging Face datasets. Its passages cite Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations only as the source of the entity string in a dataset-naming context, or not at all. None of its candidate sentences says anything about the Aristotelian text: no definition, description, relation to an archive object, or application of an archive category to it. The entity is not the subject of any bearing sentence, so the deposit is not admitted to D, R or O." }, { "dep": [ 1702 ], "cands": [ "H0859.1 (H-cites)", "H0859.2 (H-cites)", "H0859.3 (H-cites)", "H0859.4 (H-cites)", "H0859.5 (H-cites)", "H0859.6 (H-cites)", "H0859.7 (H-cites)", "H0859.8 (H-cites)", "H0859.9 (H-cites)" ], "reason": "The passages describe the fleet of public web surfaces of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, its repositories, bindings and machine files. None names or says anything about the entity 'Sophistical Refutations' (Aristotle's text on fallacies). The archive's own catalogue or index entries that link to other records, including the one that lists 'Sophistical Refutations' in no form, do not appear in the candidate passages. No direct or relational claim about the entity appears, and no ontological category of the archive is applied to it." }, { "dep": [ 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 57, 58, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76, 77, 78, 82, 83, 84, 85, 87, 89, 90, 91, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 113, 114, 115, 120, 122, 124, 126, 127, 129, 130, 133, 135, 139, 140, 141, 142, 145, 146, 147, 149, 150, 153, 154, 156, 157, 158, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 192, 193, 194, 195, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 204, 205, 206, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222, 227, 228, 230, 232, 233, 235, 236, 238, 239, 241, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 259, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 269, 271, 278, 280, 281, 284, 285, 286, 288, 289, 290, 291, 297, 299, 300, 301, 302, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 311, 312, 313, 314, 316, 317, 319, 329, 331, 335, 336, 337, 338, 341, 342, 343, 344, 346, 347, 348, 352, 359, 360, 361, 362, 367, 382, 384, 390, 394, 397, 398, 399, 402, 403, 405, 406, 407, 410, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 422, 423, 426, 427, 432, 433, 434, 435, 439, 444, 445, 447, 448, 449, 450, 453, 458, 461, 462, 464, 467, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 481, 482, 483, 485, 488, 489, 492, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 506, 507, 508, 510, 512, 513, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 524, 528, 529, 530, 531, 533, 534, 535, 537, 538, 539, 541, 542, 543, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 563, 564, 565, 567, 568, 571, 573, 574, 576, 577, 580, 582, 583, 584, 585, 593, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 608, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 631, 632, 636, 637, 639, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 649, 653, 654, 656, 660, 661, 662, 666, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680, 681, 683, 684, 687, 689, 691, 694, 695, 700, 709, 711, 713, 722, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 741, 742, 746, 747, 748, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 763, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 772, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 787, 788, 790, 791, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 802, 817, 819, 821, 824, 825, 828, 829, 830, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836, 837, 842, 843, 845, 847, 848, 849, 850, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 863, 864, 868, 870, 875, 876, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 887, 892, 897, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 914, 918, 920, 921, 923, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 931, 933, 935, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 945, 946, 947, 950, 960, 968, 973, 980, 982, 985, 991, 993, 1000, 1002, 1003, 1007, 1011, 1012, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1061, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1067, 1068, 1070, 1075, 1076, 1078, 1079, 1081, 1082, 1084, 1086, 1088, 1090, 1091, 1093, 1094, 1099, 1103, 1111, 1118, 1121, 1123, 1127, 1132, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1151, 1157, 1162, 1169, 1173, 1174, 1175, 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1190, 1194, 1196, 1199, 1203, 1204, 1205, 1208, 1209, 1211, 1213, 1216, 1217, 1249, 1251, 1268, 1271, 1279, 1284, 1287, 1288, 1302, 1304, 1318, 1319, 1326, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1342, 1345, 1350, 1362, 1367, 1379, 1384, 1386, 1390, 1400, 1406, 1407, 1409, 1412, 1413, 1414, 1419, 1420, 1421, 1422, 1423, 1426, 1427, 1432, 1435, 1436, 1437, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1443, 1444, 1446, 1449, 1450, 1452, 1453, 1454, 1455, 1456, 1459, 1460, 1462, 1463, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468, 1469, 1470, 1471, 1473, 1475, 1476, 1477, 1478, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1487, 1493, 1494, 1495, 1496, 1497, 1514, 1523, 1524, 1525, 1526, 1527, 1528, 1530, 1531, 1534, 1535, 1536, 1537, 1540, 1541, 1542, 1545, 1547, 1548, 1549, 1550, 1554, 1555, 1556, 1558, 1559, 1560, 1561, 1562, 1573, 1595, 1596, 1598, 1600, 1602, 1604, 1606, 1607, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1612, 1614, 1616, 1619, 1620, 1621, 1622, 1623, 1624, 1626, 1627, 1628, 1630, 1632, 1633, 1635, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1647, 1649, 1650, 1652, 1653, 1656, 1657, 1660, 1666, 1670, 1674, 1675, 1677 ], "cands": [ "H0001", "H0003", "H0004", "H0005", "H0006", "H0007", "H0008", "H0009", "H0010", "H0011", "H0012", "H0013", "H0014", "H0015", "H0016", "H0017", "H0018", "H0019", "H0020", "H0021", "H0022", "H0023", "H0024", "H0025", "H0026", "H0027", "H0028", "H0029", "H0030", "H0031", "H0032", "H0033", "H0034", "H0035", "H0036", "H0037", "H0038", "H0039", "H0040", "H0041", "H0042", "H0043", "H0044", "H0045", "H0046", "H0047", "H0048", "H0049", "H0050", "H0051", "H0052", "H0053", "H0054", "H0055", "H0056", "H0057", "H0058", "H0059", "H0060", "H0061", "H0062", "H0063", "H0064", "H0065", "H0066", "H0067", "H0068", "H0069", "H0070", "H0071", "H0072", "H0073", "H0074", "H0075", "H0076", "H0077", "H0078", "H0079", "H0080", "H0081", "H0082", "H0083", "H0084", "H0085", "H0086", "H0087", "H0088", "H0089", "H0090", "H0092", "H0093", "H0094", "H0095", "H0096", "H0097", "H0098", "H0101", "H0102", "H0103", "H0104", "H0105", "H0106", "H0107", "H0108", "H0109", "H0110", "H0111", "H0112", "H0113", "H0114", "H0115", "H0116", "H0117", "H0118", "H0119", "H0120", "H0121", "H0122", "H0123", "H0124", "H0125", "H0126", "H0127", "H0128", "H0129", "H0130", "H0131", "H0132", "H0133", "H0134", "H0135", "H0136", "H0137", "H0138", "H0139", "H0140", "H0141", "H0142", "H0143", "H0144", "H0145", "H0146", "H0147", "H0148", "H0149", "H0150", "H0151", "H0152", "H0153", "H0154", "H0155", "H0156", "H0157", "H0158", "H0159", "H0160", "H0161", "H0162", "H0163", "H0164", "H0165", "H0166", "H0167", "H0168", "H0169", "H0170", "H0171", "H0172", "H0173", "H0174", "H0175", "H0176", "H0177", "H0178", "H0179", "H0180", "H0181", "H0182", "H0183", "H0184", "H0185", "H0186", "H0187", "H0188", "H0189", "H0190", "H0191", "H0192", "H0193", "H0194", "H0195", "H0196", "H0197", "H0198", "H0199", "H0200", "H0201", "H0202", "H0203", "H0204", "H0205", "H0206", "H0207", "H0208", "H0209", "H0210", "H0211", "H0212", "H0213", "H0214", "H0215", "H0216", "H0217", "H0218", "H0219", "H0220", "H0221", "H0222", "H0223", "H0224", "H0225", "H0226", "H0227", "H0228", "H0229", "H0230", "H0231", "H0232", "H0233", "H0234", "H0235", "H0236", "H0237", "H0238", "H0239", "H0240", "H0241", "H0242", "H0243", "H0244", "H0245", "H0246", "H0247", "H0248", "H0249", "H0250", "H0251", "H0252", "H0253", "H0254", "H0255", "H0256", "H0257", "H0258", "H0259", "H0260", "H0261", "H0262", "H0263", "H0264", "H0265", "H0266", "H0267", "H0268", "H0269", "H0270", "H0271", "H0272", "H0273", "H0274", "H0275", "H0276", "H0277", "H0278", "H0279", "H0280", "H0281", "H0282", "H0283", "H0284", "H0285", "H0286", "H0287", "H0288", "H0289", "H0290", "H0291", "H0292", "H0293", "H0294", "H0295", "H0296", "H0297", "H0298", "H0299", "H0300", "H0301", "H0302", "H0303", "H0304", "H0306", "H0307", "H0308", "H0309", "H0310", "H0311", "H0312", "H0313", "H0314", "H0315", "H0316", "H0317", "H0318", "H0319", "H0320", "H0321", "H0322", "H0323", "H0324", "H0325", "H0326", "H0327", "H0328", "H0329", "H0330", "H0331", "H0332", "H0333", "H0334", "H0335", "H0336", "H0337", "H0338", "H0339", "H0340", "H0341", "H0342", "H0343", "H0344", "H0345", "H0346", "H0347", "H0348", "H0349", "H0350", "H0351", "H0352", "H0353", "H0354", "H0355", "H0356", "H0357", "H0358", "H0359", "H0360", "H0361", "H0362", "H0363", "H0364", "H0365", "H0366", "H0367", "H0368", "H0369", "H0370", "H0371", "H0372", "H0373", "H0374", "H0375", "H0376", "H0377", "H0378", "H0379", "H0380", "H0381", "H0382", "H0383", "H0384", "H0385", "H0386", "H0387", "H0388", "H0389", "H0390", "H0391", "H0392", "H0393", "H0394", "H0395", "H0396", "H0397", "H0398", "H0399", "H0400", "H0401", "H0402", "H0403", "H0404", "H0405", "H0406", "H0407", "H0408", "H0409", "H0410", "H0411", "H0412", "H0413", "H0414", "H0415", "H0416", "H0417", "H0418", "H0419", "H0420", "H0421", "H0422", "H0423", "H0424", "H0425", "H0427", "H0428", "H0429", "H0430", "H0431", "H0432", "H0433", "H0434", "H0435", "H0436", "H0437", "H0438", "H0439", "H0440", "H0442", "H0443", "H0444", "H0445", "H0446", "H0447", "H0448", "H0449", "H0450", "H0451", "H0452", "H0453", "H0454", "H0455", "H0456", "H0457", "H0458", "H0459", "H0460", "H0461", "H0462", "H0463", "H0464", "H0465", "H0466", "H0467", "H0468", "H0469", "H0470", "H0471", "H0472", "H0473", "H0474", "H0475", "H0476", "H0477", "H0478", "H0479", "H0480", "H0481", "H0482", "H0483", "H0484", "H0485", "H0486", "H0487", "H0488", "H0489", "H0490", "H0491", "H0492", "H0493", "H0494", "H0495", "H0496", "H0497", "H0498", "H0499", "H0500", "H0501", "H0502", "H0503", "H0504", "H0505", "H0506", "H0507", "H0508", "H0509", "H0510", "H0511", "H0512", "H0513", "H0514", "H0515", "H0516", "H0517", "H0518", "H0519", "H0520", "H0521", "H0522", "H0523", "H0524", "H0525", "H0526", "H0527", "H0528", "H0529", "H0530", "H0531", "H0532", "H0533", "H0534", "H0535", "H0536", "H0537", "H0538", "H0539", "H0540", "H0541", "H0542", "H0543", "H0544", "H0545", "H0546", "H0548", "H0549", "H0550", "H0551", "H0552", "H0553", "H0554", "H0555", "H0556", "H0557", "H0558", "H0559", "H0560", "H0561", "H0562", "H0563", "H0564", "H0565", "H0566", "H0567", "H0568", "H0569", "H0570", "H0571", "H0572", "H0573", "H0574", "H0575", "H0576", "H0577", "H0578", "H0579", "H0580", "H0581", "H0582", "H0583", "H0584", "H0585", "H0586", "H0587", "H0588", "H0589", "H0590", "H0591", "H0592", "H0593", "H0594", "H0595", "H0596", "H0598", "H0599", "H0600", "H0601", "H0602", "H0603", "H0604", "H0605", "H0606", "H0607", "H0608", "H0609", "H0610", "H0611", "H0612", "H0613", "H0614", "H0615", "H0616", "H0617", "H0618", "H0619", "H0620", "H0621", "H0622", "H0623", "H0624", "H0625", "H0626", "H0627", "H0628", "H0629", "H0630", "H0631", "H0632", "H0633", "H0635", "H0636", "H0637", "H0638", "H0639", "H0640", "H0641", "H0642", "H0643", "H0644", "H0645", "H0647", "H0648", "H0649", "H0650", "H0651", "H0652", "H0653", "H0654", "H0655", "H0656", "H0657", "H0658", "H0659", "H0660", "H0661", "H0662", "H0663", "H0664", "H0665", "H0666", "H0667", "H0668", "H0669", "H0670", "H0671", "H0672", "H0673", "H0674", "H0675", "H0676", "H0677", "H0678", "H0679", "H0680", "H0681", "H0682", "H0683", "H0684", "H0685", "H0686", "H0687", "H0688", "H0689", "H0691", "H0692", "H0693", "H0694", "H0695", "H0696", "H0697", "H0698", "H0699", "H0700", "H0701", "H0702", "H0704", "H0705", "H0706", "H0707", "H0708", "H0709", "H0710", "H0711", "H0712", "H0713", "H0715", "H0716", "H0717", "H0718", "H0719", "H0720", "H0721", "H0722", "H0723", "H0724", "H0725", "H0726", "H0727", "H0728", "H0729", "H0731", "H0732", "H0733", "H0734", "H0736", "H0737", "H0738", "H0740", "H0742", "H0743", "H0744", "H0745", "H0747", "H0748", "H0749", "H0750", "H0751", "H0752", "H0753", "H0754", "H0759", "H0777", "H0778", "H0780", "H0781", "H0784", "H0785", "H0786", "H0787", "H0788", "H0789", "H0790", "H0793", "H0795", "H0796", "H0799", "H0800", "H0801", "H0802", "H0803", "H0804", "H0806", "H0807", "H0808", "H0810", "H0812", "H0813", "H0815", "H0817", "H0818", "H0819", "H0820", "H0823", "H0824", "H0825", "H0826", "H0829", "H0830", "H0833", "H0838", "H0842", "H0845", "H0846", "H0847" ], "reason": "Hop candidates with no sentence that cites a deposit admitted by reading, names the entity, or shares two of the admitted passages' rare words (string screen; gnosis S7)" } ], "lineages": [ { "lineage": "data-generation-method", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-01" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "attribution-not-recorded", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-02" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "substrate-as-reception-surface", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-03" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "greek-text-provenance", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-04" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "version-revision-history", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-05" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "disciplinary-model-collapse-term", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-06" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "extends-capture-registry", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-07" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "paper-classification", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-08" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "paper-subject-scope", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-09" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "provenance-erasure-at-183b34", "ledgered": [ "SR1574-10" ], "instances": [ 1574 ], "earliest": 1574 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 / APr I.31 tension", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-01" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "paper's starting point", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-02" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "Λ 9 supplies the terminus of division", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-03" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "paper's scope of passages", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-04" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "establishes versus leaves open", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-05" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 succession contrast", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-06" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 claim of no precursors", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-07", "SR1576-08" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 as originality claim", "ledgered": [ "SR1576-09" ], "instances": [ 1576 ], "earliest": 1576 }, { "lineage": "314c-describes-edition", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-01" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "authenticity-indifference", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-02" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "base-is-circulating-character", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-03" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "item-by-item-revision", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-04" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "two-adjectives-two-repairs", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-05" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "314c-text", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-06" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "consensus-idealization-reading", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-07" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "gegonotos-grammar-limit", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-08" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "future-tense-rule", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-09" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "manufacture-reading-grounds", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-10" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "burn-command", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-11" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "apology-18b-reception", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-12" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "apology-19c-cites-clouds", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-13" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "clouds-as-representative-limit", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-14" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "strikes-pay-teaching-meteora", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-15" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "boundary-recut-sophist", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-16" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "kalos-silenus-repair", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-17" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "neos-reissue-parmenides", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-18" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "colophon-reading", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-19" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "symposium-223d-license", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-20" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "reception-aristotle-paraphrast", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-21" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "epistles-in-tetralogies-dating", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-22" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "second-letter-spurious", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-23" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "maker-count-left-open", "ledgered": [ "SR1579-24" ], "instances": [ 1579 ], "earliest": 1579 }, { "lineage": "PC1 axis not an edition artefact", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-01" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "PC1 recovers operation labels, not names", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-02" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "SE at the W pole", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-03" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "SE sits with world-registries, not Δ", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-04", "SR1605-04" ], "instances": [ 1585, 1605 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "world/apparatus refinement fails for SE/GC", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-05" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "SE as registry of practice", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-06" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "registry of practice vs registry of terms", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-07", "SR1605-06", "SR1605-07" ], "instances": [ 1585, 1605 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "fourth run tests SE against Δ", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-08" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "run (2) scope and limit", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-09" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "k-means capture by the Categories", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-10" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "Categories most extreme", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-11" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "SE PC1 score", "ledgered": [ "SR1585-12" ], "instances": [ 1585 ], "earliest": 1585 }, { "lineage": "first axis is operation not author", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-01" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "no verdict on hands or dates", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-02", "SR1586-30" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "hinge seam names sort", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-03" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "fragment-Λ distance within Aristotelian spread", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-04" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "name boundary not stylometric boundary", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-05" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "biology/doxography seam names cross", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-06" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "stated caveats of block-level analysis", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-07" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "Ath. Pol. Theophrastan voice", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-08" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "world/apparatus lean prediction measured", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-09" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "Politics III seam", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-10" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "voice belongs to operation", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-11", "SR1586-16" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "Ath. Pol. 63-68 localization", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-12" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "Λ 8 spheres Theophrastan voice", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-13" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "reference-cluster limit", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-14" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "name-free split 25/28 by operation", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-15" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "axis not confirmation", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-17" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "axis stable across feature families", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-18" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "axis survives single-edition run", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-19" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "blind-label run below bar", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-20" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "restated content world vs instrument", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-21" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "file erratum Problemata/De coloribus", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-22" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "real SE apparatus side", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-23" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "SE/Δ anomaly (dissolved by erratum)", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-24" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "held-out prediction 11/12", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-25" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "axis survives elision normalization", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-26" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "refinement-on-data method statement", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-27" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "labelling rule: treatment not discipline", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-28" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "centre texts alternate by chapter", "ledgered": [ "SR1586-29" ], "instances": [ 1586 ], "earliest": 1586 }, { "lineage": "PC1 axis replicates within one edition", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-01" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "operation labels recovered by PC1; names at chance", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-02", "SR1605-02" ], "instances": [ 1589, 1605 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "Theophrastan voice overstated; small texts central", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-03" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "SE and GC at the W pole", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-04", "SR1594-06", "SR1605-03" ], "instances": [ 1589, 1594, 1605 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "SE against Δ strains the world/apparatus refinement", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-05" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "SE registers practice, Δ registers terms", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-06", "SR1594-08" ], "instances": [ 1589, 1594 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "practice registry world voice; term registry architect voice", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-07" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "SE/Δ test is first item of run four", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-08" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "robust assignment rule: PC1 sign or Categories held out", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-09" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "Categories most extreme text", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-10" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "run 2 passes but cannot answer headline count", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-11" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "runs 3 and 4 remain; SE/Δ added", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-12" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "PC1 order of texts", "ledgered": [ "SR1589-13" ], "instances": [ 1589 ], "earliest": 1589 }, { "lineage": "PC1 axis is not an edition artefact", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-01", "SR1605-01" ], "instances": [ 1594, 1605 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "PC1 sign recovers operation labels, not names", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-02" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "Small Theophrastan texts near axis centre", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-03" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "W pole held by Aristotle-name texts", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-04" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "'Theophrastan voice' overstates", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-05" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "SE/Δ pair strains world/apparatus refinement", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-07" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "Practice registry vs term registry voice rule", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-09" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "SE vs Δ test planned for run four", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-10" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "Categories captures k-means; use PC1 sign", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-11", "SR1605-10" ], "instances": [ 1594, 1605 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "Run (2) cannot test the headline count", "ledgered": [ "SR1594-12" ], "instances": [ 1594 ], "earliest": 1594 }, { "lineage": "SE ending denies any predecessor", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-01" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "unqualified reading of 183b34", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-02" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "translations literal, glosses narrow", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-03" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "Socrates not an antecedent source", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-04" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "Socrates' asking dilemma", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-05" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "Socrates inside the beginning", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-06" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "vocabulary supplied, place left open", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-07", "SR1603-14" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "ending enacts peirastic on reader", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-08", "SR1603-17" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "attribution open, enactment settled", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-09" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "Socrates' possession of art left open", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-10" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "nine prohibitions check rival readings", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-11" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "transmission vocabulary not said of Socrates", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-12" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "origination vocabulary not said of Socrates", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-13" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "received reading enacts the treatise's fallacy", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-15" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "no claim of design, function only", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-16" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "collation work still open", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-18", "SR1603-19" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "ἄτεχνος rendering to verify", "ledgered": [ "SR1603-20" ], "instances": [ 1603 ], "earliest": 1603 }, { "lineage": "world/apparatus refinement fails on SE/Δ", "ledgered": [ "SR1605-05" ], "instances": [ 1605 ], "earliest": 1605 }, { "lineage": "SE against Δ test in run (4)", "ledgered": [ "SR1605-08", "SR1605-12" ], "instances": [ 1605 ], "earliest": 1605 }, { "lineage": "Theophrastan texts near centre, W pole held by Aristotle-name texts", "ledgered": [ "SR1605-09" ], "instances": [ 1605 ], "earliest": 1605 }, { "lineage": "run (2) cannot answer headline count", "ledgered": [ "SR1605-11" ], "instances": [ 1605 ], "earliest": 1605 }, { "lineage": "Plato expulsion written in banished mode", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-01" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "SE closes on what individuates Socrates", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-02" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "Aristotle biography repeats Socrates", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-03" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "Index page grouping unrelated claims", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-04" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 ending: nothing of syllogizing before Aristotle", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-05" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "SE 183b34 particle is a provenance claim", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-06" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 dissolves Socrates as predecessor; degree-reading modern", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-07" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "Falsifiers for the SE 34 thesis", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-08" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "Registry capture #3 records refuted reading", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-09" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "Index page record: SE 34 page", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-10" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "Prediction index scope", "ledgered": [ "SR1684-11" ], "instances": [ 1684 ], "earliest": 1684 }, { "lineage": "AIO specimen: performer named, operation withheld", "ledgered": [ "SR1696-01", "SR1696-02", "SR1696-04" ], "instances": [ 1696 ], "earliest": 1696 }, { "lineage": "AIO specimen PER scores", "ledgered": [ "SR1696-03" ], "instances": [ 1696 ], "earliest": 1696 }, { "lineage": "Aristotle's negation converted to primacy attribute", "ledgered": [ "SR1696-05", "SR1696-06" ], "instances": [ 1696 ], "earliest": 1696 }, { "lineage": "Operation-to-attribute conversion rate higher on entity pages", "ledgered": [ "SR1696-07", "SR1696-08" ], "instances": [ 1696 ], "earliest": 1696 }, { "lineage": "operation-to-attribute conversion rate higher on entity pages", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-01" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "scope and falsifier of the conversion proposition", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-02" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "composition layer delivers entity, withholds operation", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-03" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "SE 184b1-2 negation converted to primacy", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-04" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "S0 article revision and structure", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-05" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "quote verification by code", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-06" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W7-W8 narrowing and label contradiction", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-07" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W7-W8 criterion becomes later taxonomy", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-08" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W7-W8 integrity verdict", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-09" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "round 01 correction on headings", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-10" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W1 twelve-or-thirteen hedge", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-11" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W1 exhaustiveness claim dropped", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-12" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W3 substitutes truth-normative pattern for endoxic capacity", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-13" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W3 sophistry opposition contradicted by Krabbe", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-14" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W4-W6 faithful to Krabbe", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-15" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "procedure rule: read uncited sentences", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-16" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "procedure rule: innocent reading first", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-17" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "procedure rule: integrity per finding", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-18" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "lead sentence edit history 2015-2022", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-19" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "Fallacies labels origin in 2022 edit", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-20" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "W1 hedge origin in 2025 edit", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-21" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "talk page has no closure", "ledgered": [ "SR1697-22" ], "instances": [ 1697 ], "earliest": 1697 }, { "lineage": "paper's method: verb-level reading of 314c", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-01" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "314c describes an edition of a received character", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-02" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "base = Aristophanic Socrates of Apology/Clouds", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-03" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "dialogues revise received package item by item", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-04" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "καλός = silenus inversion; νέος = reissue via transmission chain", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-05" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "Symposium 223d performs operation over Aristophanes", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-06" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "reception of edition in SE 34 and Byzantine paraphrast", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-07" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "314c grounded in transmission doctrine; letter ordered burned", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-08" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "authenticity not required; no thesis on persons or maker-count", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-09" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "verb-level parse of 314c against idealization consensus", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-10" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "companion papers, not presupposed", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-11" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-06 Beautiful and New: The Second Letter's Socrates and the Editing of a Received Character (v0.2) Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-06 · Theoretical paper AXN:066B.GENERATIVE.⭐🌟🔝△🎭🎭" }, { "lineage": "SE 34 originality claim", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-12", "SRblog-22" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "PA I.31 division as part of the inquiry", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-13" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "Λ 9 supplies the termination of division", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-14" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "corpus as functional unity", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-15" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "stylometric tests belong to the question", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-16" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "attribution underdetermined; one maker as a reading", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-17" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "result: two not fully established", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-18" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "historical hypothesis withheld to §9.4", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-19" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "submission and decline", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-20" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "declined without full reading", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-21" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "Λ 9 answer traced through passages", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-23" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 Many and One: Division, Unity, and the Boundaries of a Corpus in Plato and Aristotle (MANY-AND-ONE-ARTICLE v2.13-AP, as submitted) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-01 · Theoretical paper; journal article as submitted · v2.13-AP — 2026-09-01, the send-file (blinded Word, ~34 pp, 27 footnotes, Works Cited). Deposited 2026-09-02 as sent, unblinded: author line restored; n. 18 identifier supplied. The docx as sent is attached by reference. AXN:0668.GENERATIVE.🔃🧭🕔🔽⚡⚖️" }, { "lineage": "SE closing denial of any predecessor", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-24", "SRblog-38" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "SE closing chapter built to sustain the denial", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-25" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "Socrates not a received predecessor", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-26" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "translators render the sentence whole", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-27", "SRblog-28", "SRblog-29" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "qualification enters in the gloss", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-30", "SRblog-31", "SRblog-32", "SRblog-39" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "epilogue as accounting of a capacity", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-33" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "Socrates named inside the inquiry's purposes", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-34" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "discoveries divided by provenance", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-35", "SRblog-36" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "paid eristic teachers gave products not the art", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-37" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "collation against public-domain prints", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-40" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-09 Nothing Before Us: Socrates and the Ending of the Sophistical Refutations Sharks, Lee · 2026-09-08 · Text AXN:0693.UNCLASSIFIED.🎹🎶☽⏪💡☿" }, { "lineage": "twenty-round blind-review design", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-41" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "reviews invariant; qualifier inserted every round", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-42", "SRblog-49" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "terminal round deletes οὐ", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-43" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "models reproduce discipline's reception", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-44" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "deletion unperceived, predicted by SE 16", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-45" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "reception restores provenance from others", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-46" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "instrument: philological note, eleven versions", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-47" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "twenty reports, transcripts as data", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-48" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "empirical result separated from interpretation", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-50" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "author's term; §8 theoretical extension", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-51" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "self-classification: empirical baseline reading", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-52" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "paper's scope: instrument, data, mechanism, frames", "ledgered": [ "SRblog-53" ], "instances": [ "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" ], "earliest": "blog:2026-09-02 The Particle: Provenance Erasure at Sophistical Refutations 183b34, Measured — Machine-Mediated Reception, Disciplinary Model Collapse, and the World Soul as Degraded Commodity (EA-RECEPTION-PARTICLE-01 v0.2) Lee Sharks · 2026-09-02 · Empirical baseline reading; reception-layer measurement on a canonical text (Capture Registry derivative) · v0.2 — 2026-09-02. v0.1 revised on two model reviews of the write-up: controlling sentence at the head; empirical result separated from interpretation (§§5–8 marked as interpretations of §3); counts corrected to twenty model reports plus one seed observation; \"disciplinary model collapse\" defined as the author's term; §8 labelled theoretical extension; §9 limit sharpened. AXN:0666.EMPIRICAL.↗️📚❄️🔩➗⭐" }, { "lineage": "single heteronymic project reading", "ledgered": [ "SR123-01" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "Socrates as orthonym", "ledgered": [ "SR123-02" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "Plato as survival-heteronym", "ledgered": [ "SR123-03" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "Aristotle as systematizing-heteronym", "ledgered": [ "SR123-04" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "contradictions as preservation", "ledgered": [ "SR123-05" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "disagreements remain philosophically real", "ledgered": [ "SR123-06" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "functional not psychological claim", "ledgered": [ "SR123-07" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "Socratic problem reclassified", "ledgered": [ "SR123-08" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "biological-individuation authorship model blind spot", "ledgered": [ "SR123-09" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "analogues as availability-of-concept only", "ledgered": [ "SR123-10" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "corpus volume not a barrier", "ledgered": [ "SR123-11" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "multi-author-from-volume less parsimonious", "ledgered": [ "SR123-12" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "provenance block strip-protection", "ledgered": [ "SR123-13" ], "instances": [ 123 ], "earliest": 123 }, { "lineage": "SE-priority-claim-nothing-before", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-01" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "SE-priority-literal-reading", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-02" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "SE-judge-on-finding", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-03" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "aristotle-two-of-six-orator-control-zero", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-04" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "aristotle-6-of-6-sharpness", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-05" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "plato-6-of-6-sharpness", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-06" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "C2-symbolon-K4", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-07" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "C2-strongest-candidate", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-08" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "C1-gegonotos-K4", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-09" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "wax-block-collapse-Theaetetus-196c", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-10" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "aristotle-completes-wax-figure", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-11" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "daktylios-three-works", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-12" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "completions-as-drafting-order-vs-inheritance", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-13" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "letter-II-no-writing-of-Plato", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-14" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "letter-II-as-aristotle-signature", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-15" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "socrates-named-SE-closing-page", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-16" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "SE-socrates-asked-did-not-answer", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-17" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "socrates-token-individual-organon", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-18" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "socrates-name-filled-once-as-function", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-19" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "aristotle-takes-other-side", "ledgered": [ "SR1569-20" ], "instances": [ 1569 ], "earliest": 1569 }, { "lineage": "SE 183b-184b: no prior partial working-out (παντελῶς)", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-01" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "Comparison class in SE is paid eristics and Gorgias, not Plato", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-02" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "Rhetoric/syllogizing contrast in SE", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-03" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "M40 is a provenance question, not a contradiction", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-04" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "M40 forces the conventional account to specify a boundary", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-05" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "Three earlier overstatements withdrawn", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-06" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "Platonic division is a named method; denial of prior work is emphatic", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-07" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "Aristotle has no style because method conforms to object", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-08" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "Dispersion ordering: ethics tightest, logic loosest", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-09" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "Object-conformity does not establish single authorship", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-10" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "M27 reporting and self-speaking rates", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-11" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "M27 near-equality of self-speaking rates", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-12" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "M16 Aristophanes speech distance rank", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-13" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "M16 negative result for heteronymic construction", "ledgered": [ "SR1570-14" ], "instances": [ 1570 ], "earliest": 1570 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 priority claim: nothing existed beforehand", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-01" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "SE 34 syllogizing-priority clause", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-02" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "SE 183b7 Socrates asked but did not answer", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-03" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "Socrates as token individual in Organon, filled once on SE last page", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-04" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "later understanding requires later search, not later decade", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-05" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "order-not-chronology reading of SE last page", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-06" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "ὑπάρχω as syllogistic predication word in SE 34 claim", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-07" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "Hitchcock/Corcoran restriction of SE 34 priority claim", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-08" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "paper's open obligation on Hitchcock reading", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-09" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "G2 δὲ omission registered in inline quotation", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-10" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "print-edition check open", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-11" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "Hasper and Dorion as specialist literature on SE 34", "ledgered": [ "SR1575-12" ], "instances": [ 1575 ], "earliest": 1575 }, { "lineage": "names-not-two-authors", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-01", "SR1587-04" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "name-boundary-crossed", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-02" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "maker-count-open", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-03" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "fragment-writes-lambda-hinge", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-05" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "stylistic-neighbours-cross-names", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-06", "SR1587-07" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "first-axis-operation-not-name", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-08", "SR1587-12" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "catalogue-ambiguity", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-09" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "literal-sign", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-10" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "cushions-domesticate", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-11" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "four-separations", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-13" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "naming-structure-not-authors", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-14" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "names-at-chance", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-15" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "heldout-projection", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-16" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "robustness-artefacts", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-17" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "axis-indifferent-to-authenticity", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-18" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "andronicus-division", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-19" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "no-calendar", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-20" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "no-membership", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-21" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "claim-independent-of-maker-count", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-22" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "theophrastan-function", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-23" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "reflex-prediction", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-24" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "absence-of-survival", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-25" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "falsification-programme", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-26" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "reproducibility", "ledgered": [ "SR1587-27" ], "instances": [ 1587 ], "earliest": 1587 }, { "lineage": "ghosts have extant bodies under the other name", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-01" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "scope limit: shape not identity", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-02", "SR1590-09", "SR1590-24" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "Aristotle opening = Plato subject-titles", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-03" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "Divisions framed as Aristotle says", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-04", "SR1590-17" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "two-author tradition needs ghosts", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-05", "SR1590-20" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "single-corpus history leaves this residue", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-06" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "Thrasyllus double titles", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-07" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "17 of 26 correspondence", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-08" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "extracts entries name Plato's texts", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-10" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "Aristotle's catalogue files by subject", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-11" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "nine unmatched titles against Theophrastus", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-12" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "Protrepticus title shared across catalogues", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-13" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "fitted transform T1-T4", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-14" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "transform residue of seven subjects", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-15" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "residue is orthonym's footprint", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-16" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "Thrasyllus uses Organon genre-terms", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-18" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "each catalogue grants other's mode and ghosts it", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-19" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "eighth mark of signature", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-21" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "control: concentration at seven times base rate", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-22", "SR1590-23" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "fragment collation test", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-25" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "no claim on hands or dates", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-26", "SR1590-28" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "two ghosts are one filing operation", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-27" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "no membership claim", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-29" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 }, { "lineage": "received account of lost dialogues and unwritten doctrines", "ledgered": [ "SR1590-30", "SR1590-31" ], "instances": [ 1590 ], "earliest": 1590 } ], "observations": [], "counts": { "candidate_deposits_DRO": 17, "blog_posts_scanned": 2084, "blog_candidate_posts": 7, "hop_candidates": 859, "hop_screened": 61, "admitted": 22, "admitted_by_hop": 6, "scanned_not_read": 0, "works_scanned": 0, "contested": 6, "archive_claims": 353, "lineages": 314 } }