{
 "row": "problematic-paper-screener",
 "pass": "first reading, 2026-10-29",
 "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 §3.4 D/R/O (working; not frozen). The string pass over 1,711 archive texts found no D or R candidate: no deposit text names the Problematic Paper Screener, PPS (as the screener), dbrech.irit, Cabanac, Magazinov or Cyril Labbé; the detector terms (tortured phrase(s), SCIgen, Mathgen, Feet of Clay) were also grepped over data/texts and match nothing. O-class ran on five classes sourced from the field (config): paper-mill detection (B2), research integrity tools (B4), post-publication assessment (B3), correction and curation of the scholarly record (B3, B4), detection of bogus publications (B2, B3, B4); 33 sentences in 23 deposits. Admission by reading: a sentence is admitted to O when it applies an archive category to a class the field sources for the screener; a sentence on another object that shares the class's words (the scholarly literature as a body of opinion, a citation in a reference list, 'fabrication of scholarly record' as a type of composition-layer harm), or on paper mills as a foil with no claim on their detection, is not. The hop (H) ran from the one deposit admitted (#741): five candidates, none admitted. The archive's own records of the entity are not deposits and are reached outside the string pass: the Capture Registry's entry (findings, analysis and q_kind) and the MMRS meta-aggregator record (census.json row problematic-paper-screener and schema_note; articles.py ARTICLES['problematic-paper-screener'], with the Academ-AI article's sentence naming the screener), ledgered as CAP-1-NN and MMRS-NN.",
 "reader": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-10-29",
 "verdicts": [
  {
   "dep": 741,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "O-class (paper-mill detection; detection of bogus publications): §8 'Epistemic Fraud, Synthetic Consensus, and the Substantive Defense' applies the archive's categories (proxy gaming, the proxy regime, content-first evaluation) to paper-mill output and to its detectability: 'documented paper-mill operations producing thousands of fraudulent publications' accumulate proxy signals indistinguishable from legitimate scholarship (¶3), gaming is hard to detect because the gamed signals are opaque (¶3), and synthetic scholarship must survive reading and a citation audit before a substantive evaluator (¶4). The class membership is the field's (B2 standfirst: the screener looks for 'telltale signs that papers were produced by paper mills'; B2 ¶3 'detecting bogus publications'; B3 'erroneous or fraudulent scientific publications'). The deposit does not name the screener.",
   "claims": [
    "O741-01",
    "O741-02",
    "O741-03"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0014"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "admitted_surface": [
  {
   "dep": "capture-registry",
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/problematic-paper-screener-aio-20261029/",
   "reason": "the registry's findings, analysis and q_kind at the entity's capture by name (OBS-9180ce10e2aa, AXN:0AB5.CAPTURE.🏔️💡🎆🟤✨♠️), read from data/EA-WG-CAPTURES-01.json",
   "claims": [
    "CAP-1-01",
    "CAP-1-02",
    "CAP-1-03",
    "CAP-1-04",
    "CAP-1-05",
    "CAP-1-06",
    "CAP-1-07"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": "MMRS",
   "url": "https://www.machinemediation.org/aggregators/problematic-paper-screener/",
   "reason": "the MMRS meta-aggregator record (compiled 2026-10-28, corrected 2026-10-29; editor Lee Sharks): article sentences (articles.py) and fields with their basis (census.json, row problematic-paper-screener; schema_note); the Academ-AI article's sentence that names the screener (MMRS-10)",
   "claims": [
    "MMRS-01",
    "MMRS-02",
    "MMRS-03",
    "MMRS-04",
    "MMRS-05",
    "MMRS-06",
    "MMRS-07",
    "MMRS-08",
    "MMRS-09",
    "MMRS-10",
    "MMRS-11",
    "MMRS-12",
    "MMRS-13",
    "MMRS-14",
    "MMRS-15",
    "MMRS-16",
    "MMRS-17",
    "MMRS-18",
    "MMRS-26",
    "MMRS-19",
    "MMRS-20",
    "MMRS-21",
    "MMRS-22",
    "MMRS-23",
    "MMRS-24",
    "MMRS-25"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "not_admitted": [
  {
   "dep": 176,
   "cands": [
    "O0005",
    "O0006"
   ],
   "reason": "paper mills as the exemplar of a failure mode of training-layer protocols (optimization for retrieval over truth) and G4 as its prohibition: a claim on the protocols and on paper mills as a foil, none on their detection or on any class the field sources for the screener"
  },
  {
   "dep": 553,
   "cands": [
    "O0011"
   ],
   "reason": "citation rings and paper mills as a counterfeit of disciplinary formation (citational density without coherence), with the summarizer's synthesis test: a claim on retrieval formation, not on the detection of paper-mill output"
  },
  {
   "dep": 741,
   "cands": [
    "O0013",
    "O0015"
   ],
   "reason": "Kriegeskorte's Open Evaluation (post-publication peer review) named in a list of precedents and in the references: a citation, no archive category applied to post-publication assessment"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    32
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0001"
   ],
   "reason": "a reference-list entry (the journal Research Integrity and Peer Review): a citation"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    54,
    968
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0002",
    "O0019"
   ],
   "reason": "'Fabrication of scholarly record' as one of the archive's types of composition-layer harm in PVE-003: a claim on Google's AI Overview, not on the correction or curation of the scholarly record"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    56,
    969,
    971,
    1101,
    542,
    1160,
    626,
    1176,
    194,
    1209,
    752,
    833,
    858,
    1219,
    412,
    1046,
    1452
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0003",
    "O0004",
    "O0020",
    "O0021",
    "O0022",
    "O0023",
    "O0025",
    "O0026",
    "O0009",
    "O0010",
    "O0027",
    "O0028",
    "O0012",
    "O0029",
    "O0007",
    "O0030",
    "O0016",
    "O0017",
    "O0018",
    "O0031",
    "O0008",
    "O0024",
    "O0032",
    "O0033"
   ],
   "reason": "'the scholarly literature' or 'the scientific record' as a body of opinion, a heading, a journal title, a reference, the archive's DOIs fixing it to the record, the composition layer flattening a record (#1046), or an accelerator's selection determining what enters the scientific record (#1452): generic uses of the class's words about other objects, no category applied to the correction or curation of the scholarly record"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    740,
    1648,
    1654,
    1681,
    1684
   ],
   "cands": [
    "H0001",
    "H0002",
    "H0003",
    "H0004",
    "H0005"
   ],
   "reason": "hop from #741 (forward: #740, its worked example; reverse: the SPXI ≠ AEO versions #1648, #1654, #1681 and the Prediction Index #1684, citing #741 for the proxy argument or as a location of predictions): none names the screener, paper mills, fraudulent publications or their detection"
  }
 ],
 "hop": {
  "from": [
   741
  ],
  "candidates": 5,
  "admitted": 0
 },
 "class_pass": "O-class: five classes sourced from the field (B2, B3, B4); 33 sentences in 23 deposits (summary.json O_class 33); one deposit admitted (#741)",
 "observations": "No deposit names the screener, its makers, its host or its detectors. The archive's bearing on the entity is carried by its own records of it (the MMRS meta-aggregator record and the capture) and, at the class, by #741's reading of paper-mill output under the proxy regime.",
 "counts": {
  "string_pass": {
   "D_sentences": 0,
   "D_deposits": 0,
   "R_sentences": 0,
   "R_deposits": 0,
   "O_direct": 0,
   "O_class": 33,
   "O_deposits": 23,
   "H_candidates": 5
  },
  "deposits_candidate": 23,
  "deposits_admitted": 1,
  "hop_candidates": 5,
  "hop_admitted": 0,
  "archive_claims": {
   "capture": 7,
   "mmrs": 26,
   "deposit": 3
  }
 }
}