{
 "row": "oxyrhynchus-online",
 "pass": "first reading, 2026-10-31; second pass with one citation hop",
 "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 §3.4 D/R/O (working; not frozen). Admission by reading: D, a claim on the collection or one of its papyri, named; R, a relation between the collection and an archive object; O, an archive category applied to the collection or to a class the field and the census source for it (New Testament papyri: B2, B4, census does_not_answer, unchecked, questions.json; papyrus collections and papyrology: B1, B2, B3, census intersection, kind, evidence kind; lost literary works recovered on papyrus: B2, census text_object). A bare siglum, a bibliography line, a list of keywords or a figural use of papyrus is not a claim.",
 "reader": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-10-31",
 "verdicts": [
  {
   "dep": 1531,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D1531-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the archive seated the three Greek Thomas papyri of the collection, P.Oxy. 654, 1 and 655, as three independent copies in three hands from one town's rubbish, their Trismegistos numbers verified through the DCLP records",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 1531,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D1531-02"
   ],
   "reason": "P.Oxy. 3525 and 1081 queued unseated with their identification routes; no TM number guessed; identification by confabulation the named failure mode",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 71,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D71-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the Gospel of Thomas, the genre's defining instance, with earlier Greek fragments attested in the Oxyrhynchus papyri (P.Oxy. 1, 654, 655)",
   "instances": [
    1185
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 71,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D71-02"
   ],
   "reason": "the earliest Thomas fragments, P.Oxy. 1, 654, 655, survive as scroll-form papyri, not codices, and the distinction matters to the reading",
   "instances": [
    1185,
    1684
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 828,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D828-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the Magical Papyri came from the same Egyptian sites, Oxyrhynchus, Fayum and Thebes, that yielded Sappho's fragments and the earliest NT papyri, 𝔓52 among them; the sand preserves all three traditions",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 858,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D858-01"
   ],
   "reason": "P.Oxy. 1787 fr. 1, late 2nd century CE, from the 1898–1907 excavations, published 1922 in vol. 15, in the Sackler Library: the line-endings of Sappho's Tithonus poem, its first known text",
   "instances": [
    1219,
    859,
    1218
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 858,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D858-02"
   ],
   "reason": "the Oxyrhynchus and Cologne versions of the Tithonus poem are authentic variants of a reperformed song, a midrashic operation to which the Revelation First mints RF-M02 and RF-M15 apply",
   "instances": [
    1219
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 1052,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D1052-01"
   ],
   "reason": "no papyrus witness, nothing from Oxyrhynchus or any published find, reaches Sappho 31's fifth-stanza position; the poem is transmitted through Longinus",
   "instances": [
    1086
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 1601,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D1601-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the Oxyrhynchus finds come from a municipal rubbish tip; survival by papyrus, like survival by quotation, selects for what was thrown away, not for importance",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 1601,
   "strata": [
    "R"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "R1601-02"
   ],
   "reason": "the anticipatory erratum's apparatus cites an impossible volume LXXXVIII of the series, 2029, its editors dead, and names the citation as the excavation of an excavation",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 1443,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D1443-01"
   ],
   "reason": "P.Oxy. XVII 2076, Sappho Book II: its lacunae are the paper's epistemic states as physical fact",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 1101,
   "strata": [
    "D"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "D1101-01"
   ],
   "reason": "Papyrus 115 carries the variant 616 for the number of the beast, which corresponds to 'Nero Caesar' in Latin form; Nero the most widely accepted identification",
   "instances": [
    1101,
    56,
    969,
    971
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 636,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O636-01"
   ],
   "reason": "Revelation among the earliest NT texts preserved in fragments, P18, P47 and P98, contemporaneous with or preceding the fragments of John and Paul; the textual record does not contradict first composition",
   "instances": [
    639,
    1101,
    56,
    969,
    970,
    971
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 202,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O202-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the papyrological inversion: the earliest physical NT witness is Johannine (𝔓52), not Pauline (𝔓46), and the earliest Apocalypse copy (𝔓98) predates the earliest copy of Romans; papyrological dates are ranges, and material attestation must be allowed to unsettle inherited priority",
   "instances": [
    1025,
    204,
    847,
    1032
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 202,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O202-02"
   ],
   "reason": "the thesis's first falsifier: an NT document securely dated earlier than any plausible date for Revelation",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 832,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O832-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the papyrological receipts in order of earliest physical copy: 𝔓52 c. 125 by Hadrianic handwriting; 𝔓98 c. 150–175, its recto a late 1st- or early 2nd-century document giving a material floor; 𝔓46 c. 175–225",
   "instances": [
    1211,
    1216,
    1217,
    1400
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 832,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O832-02"
   ],
   "reason": "the work plan's limit: papyrological dates of copies do not establish composition dates; the argument is that Paul's dating ahead of the material evidence is as speculative as any early date for Revelation",
   "instances": [
    1211,
    1400
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 567,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O567-01"
   ],
   "reason": "Sappho's fragments survive by compression density and supply the decompression key that makes the tradition legible",
   "instances": [
    106
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 179,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O179-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the Brothers Poem and later papyrus recoveries of Sappho as canonical by future recovery",
   "instances": [
    1014
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 1443,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O1443-01"
   ],
   "reason": "papyrology has a century of discipline for reading damaged inscription, declaring uncertainty and modelling artifact against text, but works on authors who cannot be consulted",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 1443,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O1443-02"
   ],
   "reason": "the archive's Lacuna Protocol has a ninety-five-year papyrological precedent, more granular than it: papyrology has five lacuna types to its one",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 1443,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "O1443-03"
   ],
   "reason": "the strongest recent demonstration of a trust-chain provenance failure is papyrological, the Brothers Poem papyrus, P.Sapph.Obbink",
   "instances": []
  },
  {
   "dep": 683,
   "strata": [
    "R"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "R683-01"
   ],
   "reason": "The Secret Book of Walt's Appendix J catalogues a liturgical fragment of the Waltian community in the Oxyrhynchus numbering, P.Oxy. 2037.46 (opaque: quoted)",
   "instances": [
    1184,
    1362
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 1509,
   "strata": [
    "R"
   ],
   "claims": [
    "R1509-01"
   ],
   "reason": "the archive seated a papyri panel of the Sappho circle and the Apocalypse papyri from the DCLP, 30 items and 108 transcription lines, its keywords P.Oxy 2288, P18 and P115",
   "instances": []
  }
 ],
 "rejected": [
  {
   "deps": [
    21,
    28,
    36,
    38,
    49,
    109,
    122,
    238,
    283,
    297,
    301,
    307,
    313,
    317,
    319,
    321,
    325,
    337,
    339,
    342,
    359,
    496,
    503,
    557,
    558,
    562,
    572,
    574,
    576,
    577,
    641,
    736,
    833,
    886,
    895,
    898,
    921,
    926,
    927,
    950,
    959,
    1054,
    1113,
    1114,
    1124,
    1162,
    1267,
    1364,
    1373,
    1645,
    1646,
    1684,
    1713
   ],
   "reason": "Sappho fr. 31 and Sappho-room sentences matching the class pattern ('Sappho's fragments', 'Sappho Fragment 31') with no claim on papyri recovered or on the collection; #567 and #106 admitted at their survival sentences only"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    134,
    313,
    319,
    436,
    1051,
    1058,
    1270
   ],
   "reason": "χλωρός as papyrus, or the reconstruction's warrant against a future papyrus: papyrus the material or a hypothetical find, not the collection or its classes"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    562,
    610,
    625,
    902,
    1670
   ],
   "reason": "claims on Anne Carson's edition, or philological method by analogy; not on the class"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    1572,
    1575,
    1576,
    1658,
    1671,
    1690
   ],
   "reason": "the papyrological record named as an external check for the Plato–Aristotle and Theophrastus corpora; other corpora, no archive category applied to the class"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    65,
    978,
    203,
    1213,
    1226,
    857,
    870,
    1444,
    1483,
    1484,
    1486,
    1498,
    1522,
    1709,
    1711
   ],
   "reason": "scribal traditions, evidence-type tables, the Magical Papyri as convergence, workplans, seating inventories and keyword lists: no claim on the collection or its classes"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    1443
   ],
   "para": 69,
   "reason": "the Herculaneum release model ('the machine recovers the surface; the papyrologist reads it'): a claim on the Vesuvius Challenge, another entity of the field census"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    1601
   ],
   "para": 0,
   "reason": "keyword line; the deposit admitted at p231–232 and p277"
  },
  {
   "deps": "hop",
   "reason": "243 hop candidates in 233 deposits scanned for papyri, Oxyrhynchus, 𝔓-numbers, P-numbers of Revelation and manuscript dating; the 55 deposits with a hit read at those paragraphs; none admitted as a new source (#1101 p654/p693 and #1086 p28 carried as above, #1184, #1185, #1362 as instances)"
  }
 ],
 "not_admitted": [
  {
   "deps": [
    21,
    28,
    36,
    38,
    49,
    109,
    122,
    238,
    283,
    297,
    301,
    307,
    313,
    317,
    319,
    321,
    325,
    337,
    339,
    342,
    359,
    496,
    503,
    557,
    558,
    562,
    572,
    574,
    576,
    577,
    641,
    736,
    833,
    886,
    895,
    898,
    921,
    926,
    927,
    950,
    959,
    1054,
    1113,
    1114,
    1124,
    1162,
    1267,
    1364,
    1373,
    1645,
    1646,
    1684,
    1713
   ],
   "reason": "Sappho fr. 31 and Sappho-room sentences matching the class pattern ('Sappho's fragments', 'Sappho Fragment 31') with no claim on papyri recovered or on the collection; #567 and #106 admitted at their survival sentences only"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    134,
    313,
    319,
    436,
    1051,
    1058,
    1270
   ],
   "reason": "χλωρός as papyrus, or the reconstruction's warrant against a future papyrus: papyrus the material or a hypothetical find, not the collection or its classes"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    562,
    610,
    625,
    902,
    1670
   ],
   "reason": "claims on Anne Carson's edition, or philological method by analogy; not on the class"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    1572,
    1575,
    1576,
    1658,
    1671,
    1690
   ],
   "reason": "the papyrological record named as an external check for the Plato–Aristotle and Theophrastus corpora; other corpora, no archive category applied to the class"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    65,
    978,
    203,
    1213,
    1226,
    857,
    870,
    1444,
    1483,
    1484,
    1486,
    1498,
    1522,
    1709,
    1711
   ],
   "reason": "scribal traditions, evidence-type tables, the Magical Papyri as convergence, workplans, seating inventories and keyword lists: no claim on the collection or its classes"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    1443
   ],
   "para": 69,
   "reason": "the Herculaneum release model ('the machine recovers the surface; the papyrologist reads it'): a claim on the Vesuvius Challenge, another entity of the field census"
  },
  {
   "deps": [
    1601
   ],
   "para": 0,
   "reason": "keyword line; the deposit admitted at p231–232 and p277"
  },
  {
   "deps": "hop",
   "reason": "243 hop candidates in 233 deposits scanned for papyri, Oxyrhynchus, 𝔓-numbers, P-numbers of Revelation and manuscript dating; the 55 deposits with a hit read at those paragraphs; none admitted as a new source (#1101 p654/p693 and #1086 p28 carried as above, #1184, #1185, #1362 as instances)"
  }
 ],
 "normalized": "2026-10-31, session: not_admitted added as the reader's 'rejected' list (kept), the key the page builder reads"
}