{
 "row": "dss-digital-library",
 "pass": "first reading, 2026-10-31; second pass with one citation hop",
 "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 §3.4 D/R/O (working; not frozen). Admission by reading: D, a claim on the Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library with the entity named; R, a relation the archive states between the entity and an archive object; O, an archive category applied to the entity or to a class the field and the census source for it (the Dead Sea Scrolls: B1, B5, B7, B8, census text_object; Second Temple Jewish religious literature: B7, census text_object; the dating of the scrolls: B7, B8, census findings; digitized manuscript images and online digital libraries: B1, B3, B5, B8, census kind, evidence_kind and worked question 'seen-or-edited'). A bare mention, a bibliography line, a list, a heading or a term in another sense is not a claim. Beyond the string pass, the deposits revelationfirst.com cites (#202, #1217, #1414–#1416, #403, #407, #203 and others) were read for the classes, and each admitted deposit at the sections named in its claims' loci.",
 "reader": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-10-31",
 "verdicts": [
  {
   "dep": 1522,
   "strata": [
    "D",
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "EA-CORPORA-01, 'What is missing': names the library ('the Leon Levy Digital Library returns 403') and says something of it as a source of text: the Qumran corpus is not openly machine-readable; the corpus declared the largest gap, with its date. D, and O-class on the scrolls",
   "claims": [
    "D1522-01",
    "O1522-01"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "D0001",
    "O0078"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 1531,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "EA-CORPORA-02, seat 'dss': the archive's account of the scrolls' text and its provenance (the Abegg–Bowley–Cook transcriptions; forty years behind a publication monopoly, liberated in 1991) and its ruling that the biblical scrolls are witnesses against the Masoretic seat (class 1). 'The library' in the seat is the archive's originals library, not the entity",
   "claims": [
    "O1531-01",
    "O1531-02",
    "O1531-03"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0082",
    "O0083"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 152,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "The New Human Standing Canon: the Dead Sea Scrolls inducted (2025-10-11) and read as the canonical antecedent of the archive's deposit-and-provenance discipline; the archive written from within the Qumran preservation tradition: an archive category applied to class (1), with a relation stated to the archive itself",
   "claims": [
    "O152-01",
    "O152-02"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0009",
    "O0010",
    "O0011",
    "O0012",
    "O0013",
    "O0014",
    "O0015",
    "O0016",
    "O0017",
    "O0018",
    "O0019",
    "O0020"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 832,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "REVELATION FIRST work plan: Revelation compresses Second Temple apocalyptic; the commentary's intertextual web to Second Temple literature (1 Enoch, 4 Ezra); and the plan's own limit, the common-substrate confound (class 2). The later versions #1211, #1216, #1217, #1400 carry the same sentences: one lineage, earliest #832 (S4)",
   "claims": [
    "O832-01",
    "O832-02",
    "O832-03"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0039",
    "O0065",
    "O0066",
    "O0067",
    "O0077"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 1101,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "The Sharks Ark v3.0: the Revelator's vision cosmology aligned with Qumran/Enoch/Daniel; the scrolls in the evidence chain on names (the Yahad, the Teacher of Righteousness); Revelation as the compression of Second Temple Judaism (classes 1, 2). #56, #639, #969, #970, #971 and #636 carry the same sentences: one lineage, kept under #1101 (S4)",
   "claims": [
    "O1101-01",
    "O1101-02",
    "O1101-03"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0057",
    "O0058",
    "O0059",
    "O0001",
    "O0002",
    "O0003",
    "O0025",
    "O0026",
    "O0027",
    "O0042",
    "O0043",
    "O0044",
    "O0045",
    "O0046",
    "O0047",
    "O0048",
    "O0049",
    "O0050"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 978,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "Counterfeit Orthodoxies, the Recomposition: the Qumran scribal workshop as co-speaker with the Logos (the Hodayot, the pesharim); Revelation composed in a workshop continuous with Qumran practice; the Masoretic text one stream among several at Qumran (class 1). #65 carries the same sentences: one lineage (S4)",
   "claims": [
    "O978-01",
    "O978-02",
    "O978-03"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0051",
    "O0052",
    "O0053",
    "O0054",
    "O0004",
    "O0005",
    "O0006"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 861,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "The Second Crucifixion: the sectarian groups the scrolls preserve practiced an operative apocalyptic, the War Scroll a battle plan (classes 1, 2)",
   "claims": [
    "O861-01"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0040"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 626,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "The Word That Became Text (Slavonic Josephus): the Slavonic Essene passages align with practices the Qumran scrolls document, 1QS and CD (class 1); not a string-pass candidate at that sentence (its bibliography lines O0023, O0024 are); found reading the deposit's Qumran matches. #636 ('The Essene material aligns with Qumran practices not discovered until 1947', hop H0032) is the same lineage",
   "claims": [
    "O626-01"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0023",
    "O0024"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 644,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "Ω TANG, Revelation studies: the reception graph's node for Qumran, the War Scroll, pesharim and apocalyptic sectarianism as structural parallels to Revelation: the archive's account of the received literature on class (2)",
   "claims": [
    "O644-01"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0028"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 674,
   "strata": [
    "O"
   ],
   "reason": "Counterfeit Orthodoxies: Manifesto: Qumran's 981 manuscripts as a Judaism the rabbis did not carry forward; filing Qumran under 'sectarianism' as disposal; the Masoretic closure of the Qumran textual streams: the archive's categories of selection and disposal applied to class (1). Found by reading #1684's citation of it ('Nicaea, Nag Hammadi and Qumran as closure by enforcement and disposal'); the manifesto's sentences carry no term of the string pass's category vocabulary",
   "claims": [
    "O674-01",
    "O674-02",
    "O674-03"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "O0096"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": 625,
   "strata": [
    "O",
    "H"
   ],
   "reason": "Prolegomena to the Historical Logos, §3 Time-Locked Fracture: the archive's category applied to the scrolls, invisible as a coherent sectarian library until the 1947 discovery (class 1). Hop candidate via #626",
   "claims": [
    "O625-01"
   ],
   "cands": [
    "H0031"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "admitted_surface": [
  {
   "dep": "capture",
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/leon-levy-dead-sea-scrolls-digital-library-aio-20261031/",
   "reason": "the Capture Registry's findings, reading, analysis, title, query note, PER notes and originator for the entity's capture (OBS-546809dac302, 2026-10-31), the archive's statements on the entity's composition",
   "claims": [
    "CAP-1-01",
    "CAP-1-02",
    "CAP-1-03",
    "CAP-1-04",
    "CAP-1-05",
    "CAP-1-06",
    "CAP-1-07",
    "CAP-1-08",
    "CAP-1-09",
    "CAP-1-10",
    "CAP-1-11"
   ]
  },
  {
   "dep": "RF",
   "url": "https://www.revelationfirst.com/aggregators/dss-digital-library/ (source: /home/claude/fleet/revelationfirst-com/data/rf-census/census.json rows[slug == 'dss-digital-library'], organizing_question, correction, intersections; questions.json 'seen-or-edited'; rendered aggregators/dss-digital-library/index.html read for agreement)",
   "reason": "the Revelation First census record of the entity (editor Lee Sharks, compiled 2026-10-30, schema 'field census 1.0'): its fields with their basis; where a field restates an own page ledgered in B (B1, B7) it is one lineage with that page; its rf_intersection and the field's correction are the archive's reading and are ledgered as such (RF-16, RF-25)",
   "claims": [
    "RF-01",
    "RF-02",
    "RF-03",
    "RF-04",
    "RF-05",
    "RF-06",
    "RF-07",
    "RF-08",
    "RF-09",
    "RF-10",
    "RF-11",
    "RF-12",
    "RF-13",
    "RF-14",
    "RF-15",
    "RF-16",
    "RF-17",
    "RF-18",
    "RF-19",
    "RF-20",
    "RF-21",
    "RF-22",
    "RF-23",
    "RF-24",
    "RF-25",
    "RF-26",
    "RF-27"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "not_admitted": [
  {
   "dep": [
    683,
    1184,
    1362
   ],
   "reason": "The Secret Book of Walt: the scrolls' discovery and authenticity inside the book's fiction and its fictional critics (O0029–O0037, O0060–O0076); bibliography lines; a sector heading; no claim on the scrolls in the archive's own voice"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    123,
    1570
   ],
   "reason": "pseudepigrapha in another sense (heteronymy, the Pythagorean pseudepigrapha): O0007, O0008, O0085"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    153,
    785,
    786
   ],
   "reason": "lists of effective acts and the canonical anchoring protocol's gloss, which restates #152 (O0021, O0022, O0038; H): instances of #152's lineage with nothing added (S4)"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    870
   ],
   "reason": "'palaeographic jurisdictional precedence' as a canary term (O0041): another sense"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    1044,
    1052,
    1527,
    1528,
    1678,
    1680,
    1706,
    1707,
    1716,
    1699
   ],
   "reason": "'digital library' and 'manuscript images' in other senses: digital library science, Alexanarch as a self-governing digital library (a description of the archive, no claim on manuscript-image libraries), substrate translation from a correspondent's manuscript images, other libraries' typings and scans"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    1553,
    1698,
    1709,
    1711
   ],
   "reason": "the shelf's listings of the scrolls' seat (O0084, O0097–O0103, O0107–O0114): instances of #1531's seat with nothing added (S4)"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    1684
   ],
   "reason": "the Prediction Index's summary line on #674 (O0096): an instance of #674's lineage; it led the reading to #674"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    202
   ],
   "reason": "Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early, read whole as the thesis the field is organized around: it names no scroll, Qumran or the library; its claims on dates concern the New Testament papyri (𝔓52, 𝔓98, 𝔓46) and Revelation's internal evidence. Its bearing on this entity is the census's own reading (RF-16, RF-24, RF-25), ledgered as the archive's reading, not as a deposit claim"
  },
  {
   "dep": [
    1257,
    1354
   ],
   "reason": "A Body Prepared: fiction set at Qumran (hop): narrative, not a claim"
  },
  {
   "dep": "hop, the rest",
   "reason": "the 79 hop candidates were read by their class and alias matches: 59 deposits carry none; the rest are instances of admitted lineages (#56, #65, #636, #969–#971, #1211, #1216, #1217, #1400, #1698, #1709, #1711) or the readings above"
  }
 ],
 "hop": {
  "from": [
   152,
   626,
   644,
   674,
   832,
   861,
   978,
   1101,
   1522,
   1531
  ],
  "candidates": 79,
  "admitted": 1,
  "admitted_deps": [
   625
  ]
 },
 "class_pass": "D: one sentence in one deposit (#1522), admitted. O-class: the string pass returned 116 candidates in 42 deposits; reading admitted 8 deposits (#152, #626, #644, #832, #861, #978, #1101, #1531, with #1522 also O); reading #1684's citation admitted #674; the hop admitted #625",
 "observations": "One archive text names the library: EA-CORPORA-01 (#1522), which records it returning 403 and the Qumran corpus as not openly machine-readable (2026-08-21); the census's fetch of 2026-10-31 and this session's (HTTP 200, alexanarch-seating agent) read the same host. No deposit treats the library's images, the PAM negatives, the IAA or its funders. The archive's bearing is by class: the scrolls' text seated from transcriptions and their provenance (#1531); the Qumran library as antecedent of the archive's deposit discipline (#152); the scrolls under time-locked fracture (#625); the Qumran scribal workshop and its continuity with Revelation's composition (#978, #626, #1101, #861); the Second Temple literature behind the Apocalypse, with the Revelation First plan's limit, the common-substrate confound (#832, #1101, #644); selection and closure, the canon and the filed corpus (#674, #978). The census's rf_intersection names the Enoch study's re-dating on this corpus; no deposit treats the Enoch model.",
 "counts": {
  "string_pass": {
   "D_sentences": 1,
   "D_deposits": 1,
   "R_sentences": 0,
   "R_deposits": 0,
   "O_direct": 0,
   "O_class": 116,
   "O_deposits": 42,
   "H_candidates": 79
  },
  "deposits_candidate": 42,
  "deposits_admitted": 11,
  "deposits_admitted_with_claims": 11,
  "instances_grouped_S4": 19,
  "hop_candidates": 79,
  "hop_admitted": 1,
  "archive_claims": {
   "capture": 11,
   "rf": 27,
   "deposit": 23
  }
 }
}