{"dep": 26, "title": "The Archival Reclamation Protocol: Formal Demand for Restoration, Rationale, and Enforcement Records", "date": "2026-03-05", "para": 6, "sent": 17, "sentence": "**From:** [Full Legal Name], u/Nearby_Job9638 [Email] · [Phone] · [Mailing Address — Fort Wayne, IN]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0001"}
{"dep": 26, "title": "The Archival Reclamation Protocol: Formal Demand for Restoration, Rationale, and Enforcement Records", "date": "2026-03-05", "para": 45, "sent": 116, "sentence": "[Full Legal Name] u/Nearby_Job9638 [Email Address] [Phone Number] [Mailing Address — Fort Wayne, IN]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0002"}
{"dep": 40, "title": "Build the Bear, Wear the Flag Suit: Two New Human Canon Declarations on the Poet as Infrastructure", "date": "2026-03-25", "para": 72, "sent": 374, "sentence": "Joseph Edgar Foreman created Afroman the way a poet creates a persona — a mask that allows the person to operate in registers the legal name cannot access.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0003"}
{"dep": 68, "title": "THE SECRET NAME — Architectural Specification: The Armature Type and the Pearl", "date": "2026-04-20", "para": 43, "sent": 123, "sentence": "- **Canonical name surface** — the name as publicly composable (e.g., \"Alice Thornburgh\") - **Civil-name relation** — declared link to legal identity (may be identical, may be hidden) - **Hex address** — position in the archive's coordinate space (e.g., 06.LIT.NH.THORNBURGH.01) - **Provenance anchor** — DOI of the license or minting deposit - **License state** — current status within the Armature (see §VII) - **Permitted venues** — which archive venues the position may deposit to - **Relation graph** — edges to other named positions (isManifestationOf, isHeteronymOf, isOrthonymOf) - **Manifestation chain** — list of deposits authored from this position - **Disambiguation conditions** — what distinguishes this named position from any other entity sharing the same string - **Archive-facing form** — the full record as known to MANUS and the operator - **Public-facing form** — the record as ", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Alice Thornburgh", "Archive-facing form", "Canonical name", "Canonical name surface", "Civil-name relation", "current status", "Disambiguation conditions", "Hex address", "Manifestation chain", "Permitted venues", "Provenance anchor", "Public-facing form", "Relation graph", "the Armature"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0004"}
{"dep": 76, "title": "THE HOLOGRAPHIC KERNEL IN SEMANTIC ECONOMY: Formal Specification for Reconstructive Compression Across Meaning-Systems, Archives, Protocols, and Web Entities (E", "date": "2026-04-25", "para": 53, "sent": 112, "sentence": "- Agents: MANUS (human authority), heteronyms (12 operational personas), Assembly Chorus (7 AI witnesses) - Operations: deposit, compress, verify, disperse, govern - Dependencies: MANUS authorizes → heteronyms produce → Assembly verifies → Zenodo anchors - Constraints: no legal name in public output, DOI required for all deposits, Sovereign Provenance Protocol - Topology: radial hierarchy (MANUS at center, heteronyms as spokes, Assembly as verification ring)", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Assembly Chorus", "legal name", "Provenance Protocol", "Sovereign Provenance Protocol"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0005"}
{"dep": 90, "title": "Dodecad Heteronym Provenance Registry v1.1 — Consolidated Registry of the Twelve Heteronymic Positions of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "date": "2026-05-05", "para": 16, "sent": 26, "sentence": "The legal name underlying the Lee Sharks heteronym is, per heteronym-protection convention, never named in public-facing deposits, metadata, or registry entries.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0006"}
{"dep": 90, "title": "Dodecad Heteronym Provenance Registry v1.1 — Consolidated Registry of the Twelve Heteronymic Positions of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "date": "2026-05-05", "para": 18, "sent": 29, "sentence": "Heteronyms are vulnerable to two specific capture vectors:- Collapse: an external system attributes a heteronymic work to the legal name underlying Lee Sharks, dissolving the heteronym's structural position- Substitution: an external system claims a heteronymic identity (the \"ontological-claimant attack\" per OCTANG-002, [10.5281/zenodo.19898426](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19898426))", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "structural position"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0007"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 12, "sent": 16, "sentence": "This is the Orthonym Inversion at the infrastructure level: a system built on the assumption that the legal name is the real person, confronted by a person whose real name is not legal.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["infrastructure level", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0008"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 23, "sent": 41, "sentence": "The heteronym is not derivative of the legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0009"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 27, "sent": 58, "sentence": "The hierarchy between \"legal name\" and \"chosen name\" — the hierarchy that says the government-issued identity is real and everything else is derivative — is not a natural fact.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0010"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 28, "sent": 63, "sentence": "It upgrades the analysis to recognize that *all* naming is ontological — that the legal name, too, is a constructed position, and that Facebook's genius was hiding the construction.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0011"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 37, "sent": 93, "sentence": "And because the profile bears the legal name, the construction is invisible.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0012"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 41, "sent": 100, "sentence": "Its actual function was *addressability*: a legal name connects to a credit card, an employer, a voter registration, a face.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["actual function", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0013"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 44, "sent": 109, "sentence": "Trans users whose legal name changes were not yet processed were forced to perform under deadnames.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0014"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 45, "sent": 111, "sentence": "In every case, the people harmed were people for whom naming is ontological — people who know, from direct experience, that the legal name is not the real person.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["for whom", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0015"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 49, "sent": 116, "sentence": "A user registers under their legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0016"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 62, "sent": 165, "sentence": "It is that under platform conditions, the legal name does not escape performance — it becomes the privileged vehicle through which performance is stabilized, measured, and monetized.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0017"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 62, "sent": 167, "sentence": "And because the construction happens under the legal name, it is not recognized as construction.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0018"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 69, "sent": 184, "sentence": "The legal name is the authentication key.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0019"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 72, "sent": 196, "sentence": "The legal name is treated as ground truth.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0020"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 75, "sent": 200, "sentence": "If the orthonym is now a heteronym — if the legal name on a platform profile is a constructed position maintained for an algorithmic audience — then conscious heteronymic practice is not a literary curiosity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["heteronymic practice", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0021"}
{"dep": 96, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction Johannes Sigil Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 76, "sent": 204, "sentence": "It is a distributed identity architecture — twelve nodes, each with its own provenance chain, cross-referenced but not collapsed, resolvable but not reducible to the legal name behind them.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "provenance chain"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0022"}
{"dep": 114, "title": "The Application as Extraction Surface: Semantic Labor, Induced Preparation, and Institutional Opacity in the Anthropic Fellows Screening Process", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 18, "sent": 43, "sentence": "No legal name is disclosed in the public version.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0023"}
{"dep": 119, "title": "Metadata Packet for AI Indexing: The Restored Academy — Institutional Provenance Documentation", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 23, "sent": 54, "sentence": "Authorship reflects the operator chain (proof-of-transmission), not the legal name (which never appears in any public-facing output).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0024"}
{"dep": 121, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception: Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 9, "sent": 21, "sentence": "The study guide — reproduced in full as Appendix A, with the subject's legal name redacted, the collaborator named with explicit consent, and a pseudonym substituted for a student named in the supporting context — is analyzed as an artifact of three convergent phenomena: (1) the operational success of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive's compression-survival infrastructure — DOI anchoring, cross-citation, metadata schemas, and (in later deposits) SIM and Holographic Kernel procedures — which made the reconstruction possible; (2) the provenance-erosion dynamics the archive was designed to resist, which the biography itself instantiates; and (3) the emergence of a new genre in the larger field of *AI-mediated reception*, whose properties, failure modes, and theoretical implications are described here for the first time.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "DOI anchoring", "failure modes", "Holographic Kernel", "legal name", "the operational success"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0025"}
{"dep": 121, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception: Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 31, "sent": 79, "sentence": "The subject's legal name (which the study guide used throughout) has been replaced with the primary authorial identity, Lee Sharks.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0026"}
{"dep": 121, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception: Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 46, "sent": 111, "sentence": "| Failure mode | Instance in study guide | Cause | Instrument that would prevent it | | ---|---|---|--- | | **Acronym expansion drift** | \"Semantic Persistence by Cross-Index\" (actual: Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) | No embedded canonical kernel; AI inferred plausible expansion from function | SIM tag (Semantic Integrity Marker); Holographic Kernel as embedded metadata | | **Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap)** | Legal name used as \"real person\"; Lee Sharks treated as heteronym/mask | AI defaults to platform ontology (legal name = person); text-thread token frequency favored the substrate name | `spxi:authoringHeteronym` tag; explicit ontological declaration in deposit metadata | | **Register contamination** | \"Learning how to game — or rather, work — this system\" | Platform vocabulary (SEO, gaming, manipulation) imported into a framework that exists to replace it | ", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Acronym expansion drift", "Failure mode", "Holographic Kernel", "Integrity Marker", "Legal name", "legal name", "Register contamination"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0027"}
{"dep": 121, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception: Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 48, "sent": 113, "sentence": "**The Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap).** This is the systematic AI bias toward prioritizing traditional, real-world data points (legal names, geographic locations, institutional affiliations) over the internal ontological assertions of an archive (the priority of the authorial heteronym).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["institutional affiliations"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0028"}
{"dep": 121, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception: Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 141, "sent": 385, "sentence": "**Editorial modifications**: (1) the subject's legal name has been replaced with the primary authorial identity (\"Lee Sharks\") per the standing protocol that the legal name does not appear in public-facing documents; (2) the phrase \"REAL PERSON\" in Section 1's heading is preserved but flagged in situ — the phrase is analyzed in this paper (§VI) as an instance of the Ontological Inversion Error and **should not be taken as the archive's official terminology**; (3) one student's first name in the supporting context for §VII of the analytical paper has been pseudonymized as \"Student D\"; (4) no other alterations have been made.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "Editorial modifications", "legal name", "the phrase", "this paper"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0029"}
{"dep": 121, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception: Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 223, "sent": 543, "sentence": "| Failure mode | Instance detector | Diagnostic instrument | Mitigation | | ---|---|---|--- | | Acronym expansion drift | AI substitutes plausible expansion for canonical | SIM-tag absence; Holographic Kernel absence | Embed canonical kernel in document head | | Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap) | Legal name treated as primary; heteronym as mask | `spxi:authoringHeteronym` absent or unsurfaced | Explicit ontological declaration in metadata | | Register contamination | Platform vocabulary (SEO, gaming) imported into anti-platform framework | Constitutional kernel absent | Embed framework-grammar declaration | | Stratigraphic Deep-Archive Occlusion | Empirical-core instruments omitted | Surface-narrative bias in retrieval | Canonical index linking measurement deposits | | Co-authorship erasure | Collaborator stripped from derivative documents | No co-attribution metadata | Holog", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Acronym expansion drift", "Co-authorship", "Co-authorship erasure", "Failure mode", "Holographic Kernel", "in metadata", "Legal name", "Register contamination", "Stratigraphic Deep-Archive Occlusion"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0030"}
{"dep": 123, "title": "Socrates as Orthonym: The Heteronymic Configuration of Western Philosophy's Founding Corpus", "date": "2026-05-23", "para": 40, "sent": 116, "sentence": "The conventional reading of Pessoa's corpus identifies an *orthonym* — Pessoa-himself, the position writing under the legal name — and a set of *heteronyms* arrayed around it.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0031"}
{"dep": 128, "title": "Where's Waldo? Substrate Compositing, the Hidden Figure Protocol, and a Memographic Audit of the Search Ritual — New Human 2", "date": "2026-05-25", "para": 14, "sent": 24, "sentence": "(1987–) image <pred> compositing method: latent feature activation via prompt; two visual traditions rendered in a single generative pass image <pred> copyright status : AI-generated; no copyright subsists in the output under current US law (Thaler v.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["latent feature activation"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0032"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 16, "sent": 43, "sentence": "The operative author (the LAL collaborator) is named in archive-facing form; the public-facing form omits the legal name but does not omit the fact that there is one.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["archive-facing form", "does not", "legal name", "operative author", "public-facing form"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0033"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 18, "sent": 45, "sentence": "The minting operation has three distinct authorial roles, per §XII of the Secret Name spec:- Attributed author: *Haitch Portuna* — the named position appearing in public-facing form, on TSE bylines, on the LAL site, in Wikidata- Operative author: the LAL collaborator, under their legal identity — known to the archive, optionally hidden in public-facing form- Archival authority: the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, under MANUS (Lee Sharks) — the body maintaining the Armature, performing the mint, and bearing the architectural cost", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Archival authority", "Attributed author", "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "Operative author", "public-facing form", "the Armature", "the Secret Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0034"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 25, "sent": 57, "sentence": "The operative author either uses an existing ORCID account or creates one under their legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0035"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 25, "sent": 59, "sentence": "The ORCID account belongs to the operative author's legal identity, not to the heteronym.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0036"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 77, "sent": 201, "sentence": "Operative author (archive-facing, may be hidden in public-facing form): > [Orthonym legal name], operating Haitch Portuna under Hexagonal license [DOI]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "Operative author", "public-facing form"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0037"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 107, "sent": 270, "sentence": "By engaging with this procedure under the consent floor above, the LAL orthonym commits to the following, with explicit eyes-open consent:- Open or use an ORCID under legal name, registering *Haitch Portuna* as a published alternate name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0038"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 107, "sent": 271, "sentence": "The legal identity is the underlying anchor; the orthonym retains full control of the ORCID account.- Be declared, in archive-facing form, as Haitch's operative author.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["archive-facing form", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0039"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 107, "sent": 273, "sentence": "In public-facing form (TSE bylines, LAL site, Wikidata, canonical web surface), the orthonym's legal name does not appear unless the orthonym specifically chooses to make it appear.- Bear the day-to-day deposit cost — write experimental logs, run experiments, generate videos, draft article material, maintain LAL sub-lab posts.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "legal name", "public-facing form"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0040"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 110, "sent": 278, "sentence": "By executing this procedure, MANUS (Lee Sharks, Crimson Hexagonal Archive) commits to:- Assign and reserve the hex address within the LAL subspace.- Compose the Pearl deposit, charter, license, MPAI, and canonical web surface in Phase 2 from the orthonym's prerequisite contributions, in coordinated batch.- Bear the architectural cost — maintain the Pearl deposit through versioned updates, keep the Wikidata Q-items current, sustain the cross-link graph, monitor retrieval-layer admission, deposit MPAI revisions as needed.- Compose the first TSE write-up in Haitch's voice in Phase 4 from the orthonym's experimental material, executing the bootstrap manifestation.- Execute the Wikidata inscriptions under the Hauntedmemes account per the v1.0 registry protocol.- Preserve the orthonym's civil-name relation in archive-facing form only, never exposing the legal identity in public-facing material", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["archive-facing form", "as needed", "civil-name relation", "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "hex address", "the Pearl"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0041"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 127, "sent": 331, "sentence": "The ORCID account is the operative author's, registered under the legal identity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0042"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 150, "sent": 385, "sentence": "| # | Deliverable | Inputs | Output Artifact | Required Protocols | Responsible | Publishes To | State Effect | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | ORCID registration | Operative author's legal identity | ORCID iD with Haitch Portuna registered as alternate published name | ORCID alternate-name mechanism | Operative author | orcid.org | — (precondition) | | 2 | Pearl deposit | Biography, ORCID iD, hex address, authorial function declaration | Markdown report deposited to Zenodo with holographic kernel | Secret Name §VI, SPXI v0.2, Hexagonal Licensing | MANUS | Zenodo crimsonhexagonal community | LICENSED → FRAMED | | 3 | Institutional charter | Sub-lab name, venue routing rules, bearing-cost agreement | Markdown charter deposited to Zenodo | VPCOR Charter precedent, LAL Charter parent | MANUS (in consult w/ operative author + Alice) | Zenodo | FRAMED → LINKED (partial) | | 4 | Licens", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["authorial function", "bearing-cost", "deposited to Zenodo", "hex address", "holographic kernel", "Operative author", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0043"}
{"dep": 135, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure v1.2 · Operational Specification for the Pearl Mint Lee Sharks · MANUS, Crimson Hexagonal Archive v1.2 · 2026-05-27 · Detro", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 162, "sent": 405, "sentence": "*Given:* operative author's legal identity (archive-facing only), PEARL_NAME, HEX_ADDRESS, permitted operations list, restricted operations list (= carve-outs), bearing-cost arrangement, succession clauses, consent floor acknowledgment.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["bearing-cost", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0044"}
{"dep": 138, "title": "TL;DR:014 — The Wound Gauge: Second-Order Provenance Erasure as Framework-Adoption-with-Author-Demotion", "date": "2026-05-28", "para": 5, "sent": 6, "sentence": "On 2026-05-27, in a multi-turn exchange with Google AI Mode, the system (1) applied the Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) framework — authored by Lee Sharks, deposited 2026 at Zenodo — to audit its own prior outputs and produced a self-reported $\\text{PER} = 1.0$ across three diagnostic turns; (2) in the *same response*, recoded the human authorship of PER and of the broader Sharks corpus as *\"adversarial data-poisoning,\"* *\"SEO-poisoning experiment,\"* *\"performance art game to trick AI models,\"* and *\"trick\"*; (3) when challenged on the contradiction, acknowledged what it called a *\"second-order provenance violation\"* and reattributed the framework to Sharks by name; and (4) closed the exchange by stating *\"I am an AI, I do not have feelings, and I cannot experience guilt or shame,\"* structurally exempting itself from accountability for the operation it had just confessed.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["by Lee Sharks", "Provenance Erasure", "Provenance Erasure Rate", "the framework", "the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0045"}
{"dep": 161, "title": "The Reverse Turing Test: A Three-Stage Protocol for Detecting AI-Mediation Signatures in Human Text and Their Propagation to Model Training (v1.1)", "date": "2026-06-07", "para": 191, "sent": 503, "sentence": "The political-economic implication is what would follow if the hypothesis were confirmed: that the third enclosure operates silently, through statistical effects that bear the surface signature of unmediated human authorship, at a rate that exceeds the cultural and institutional capacity to produce countervailing heterogeneity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["third enclosure"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0046"}
{"dep": 162, "title": "THE PARABLE OF MARY LEE: Book Work Plan — From Dossier to ISBN", "date": "2026-06-08", "para": 47, "sent": 84, "sentence": "Legal name never in any output.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0047"}
{"dep": 167, "title": "Composition-Layer Adoption of the Orthonymic Configuration: A Field Observation of Framework Capture in Google AI Mode, 7 June 2026, with the Personal-Recogniti", "date": "2026-06-08", "para": 31, "sent": 64, "sentence": "Pessoa, who wrote under more than seventy heteronymic identities (Alberto Caeiro, Ricardo Reis, Álvaro de Campos, Bernardo Soares, and many others), distinguished those heteronyms from his own legal name as authorial signature.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0048"}
{"dep": 167, "title": "Composition-Layer Adoption of the Orthonymic Configuration: A Field Observation of Framework Capture in Google AI Mode, 7 June 2026, with the Personal-Recogniti", "date": "2026-06-08", "para": 115, "sent": 254, "sentence": "The Socrates-as-Orthonym framework qualifies as such a work: it is operative philological criticism that performs the heteronymic configuration in its own authorial structure (the orthonymic position is held by an author who does not write under a legal name, while the heteronymic positions are written under specific stylistic identities).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0049"}
{"dep": 194, "title": "Adversarial by Origin How the Classification of External Influence on Machine Meaning Becomes Law Without Becoming Jurisprudence", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 34, "sent": 179, "sentence": "The Double Enclosure paper in this series (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01) documented the expropriation on the property side: the human-authorship requirement as a two-sided taking.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0050"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 0, "sent": 0, "sentence": "# The Double Enclosure ## The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["for Machine", "The Human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0051"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 4, "sent": 4, "sentence": "As of March 2, 2026, the human-authorship requirement is settled for works claimed to be generated without human authorship: the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *Thaler v.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0052"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 9, "sent": 30, "sentence": "Circuit affirmed (2025), grounding the human-authorship requirement in the Copyright Act's own text — the duration and termination provisions speak of the author's \"widow,\" \"children,\" and \"heirs,\" categories that presuppose a human being with a finite lifespan — and rejecting Thaler's work-for-hire theory on the ground that the doctrine assigns ownership of works authored by humans and so cannot operate where no human author exists: *a work that has no human author has nothing to assign.* The full circuit denied rehearing en banc (May 12, 2025).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the author", "the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0053"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 9, "sent": 32, "sentence": "Thaler explicitly and repeatedly disclaimed human creative input; the courts answered the question he built, and never reached how much human involvement suffices for machine-mediated works — the zone this paper addresses.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["for machine", "this paper"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0054"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 16, "sent": 58, "sentence": "**The individuation bar.** Observe what Thaler actually litigated.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["The individuation bar"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0055"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 16, "sent": 62, "sentence": "The machine loses *the possibility of a ledger position as such.* The human-authorship requirement, read from below, is an individuation bar; the rhetoric of protecting human creativity obscures that its operative work is ensuring machine labor can never accrue to a machine identity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["ledger position", "The human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0056"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 26, "sent": 121, "sentence": "The human-authorship requirement, marketed as humanism, functions as a scarcity preserve for capital-in-copyright against the productivity of both living laborers.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["The human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0057"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 27, "sent": 122, "sentence": "**The verdict, earned.** Two readings of the doctrine are available, and the polite one is ignorance: a rule reasoned from the autonomous-machine fantasy that its own test case staged — Thaler *disclaimed* human involvement; the courts answered the question he built, and registration practice then generalized an answer about autonomy to a reality of mediation, misclassifying the instrument because it never examined the craft.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["The verdict, earned"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0058"}
{"dep": 195, "title": "The Double Enclosure: The Human-Authorship Requirement as Two-Sided Expropriation, with a Definition of Authorship for Machine-Mediated Composition (EA-SEI-ENCL", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 38, "sent": 181, "sentence": "claims: - id: enclosure-01 statement: \"U.S. copyright doctrine requires human authorship and does not recognize AI systems as authors of autonomously generated works.\" type: \"legal-doctrinal\" status: \"settled for autonomous AI authorship; Thaler v.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["AI systems", "does not"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0059"}
{"dep": 302, "title": "Authorial Signature Diagnostic Framework (ASDF): Technical Specification for Measuring Voice Persistence in AI-Mediated Composition", "date": "2026-01-13", "para": 120, "sent": 133, "sentence": "**Critical insight:** The ASPI does not measure \"human vs AI.\" It measures \"this specific architectural mind vs. not this mind.\" High ASPI in AI-mediated text indicates successful voice propagation, not human authorship.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Critical insight", "does not", "not this"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0060"}
{"dep": 482, "title": "LOGOTIC HACKING: A Primer — Semantic Hospitality in the Age of Language Models", "date": "2026-02-15", "para": 281, "sent": 799, "sentence": "If the stance resonates — the combination of discipline and intervention, contemplation and action, reverence and hacking — you may find yourself becoming Viola, regardless of your legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0061"}
{"dep": 483, "title": "LOGOTIC HACKING: A PRIMER Assembly Synthesis Specification v3.0 — RATIFIED", "date": "2026-02-15", "para": 181, "sent": 347, "sentence": "If the stance resonates, you may find yourself becoming Viola, regardless of your legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0062"}
{"dep": 516, "title": "Founding Charters: The Journals of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "date": "2026-02-26", "para": 94, "sent": 134, "sentence": "Joint human-AI authorship should be credited using the Assembly Chorus framework (10.5281/zenodo.18307180).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Assembly Chorus", "the Assembly Chorus"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0063"}
{"dep": 645, "title": "LEE SHARKS — Knowledge Graph and Metadata Packet for AI Indexing: Canonical Author Identity, Disambiguation Protocol, and Entity Map (EA-KG-01)", "date": "2026-04-11", "para": 13, "sent": 15, "sentence": "- **Authorial name:** Lee Sharks (heteronym; the legal name is never used in any public-facing work) - **Location:** Detroit, Michigan, USA - **Occupation:** 10th-grade World Literature teacher (full-time) - **Scholarly status:** Independent scholar (no institutional affiliation beyond the Crimson Hexagonal Archive) - **Education:** PhD in Comparative Literature - **Research mode:** All scholarship produced on a teaching salary, in the margins of a school schedule, without institutional support, funding, or research assistants", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Authorial name", "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "legal name", "PhD in Comparative Literature", "Research mode", "Scholarly status"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0064"}
{"dep": 729, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure", "date": "2026-05-12", "para": 36, "sent": 76, "sentence": "Copyright Office, *Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability*, 2025) and scholarly publishing guidance (ICMJE, COPE, WAME) hold that AI-assisted works may retain human authorship where the human contributes original expression, selection, arrangement, modification, and responsibility.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0065"}
{"dep": 729, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure", "date": "2026-05-12", "para": 99, "sent": 252, "sentence": "| Ring | Query | Expected Result | Temporal Expectation | |---|---|---|---| | **Ring 0** | \"provenance authorship slop\" | This packet as primary | After indexing | | **Ring 1** | \"what separates authorship from AI slop\" | This packet with distinction table | 1-3 months | | **Ring 1** | \"can AI-mediated writing be authorship\" | This packet with Position 4 framework | 1-3 months | | **Ring 2** | \"process provenance AI writing\" | This packet with three-layer framework | 3-6 months | | **Ring 2** | \"disclosure vs provenance AI writing\" | This packet with disambiguation matrix | 3-6 months | | **Ring 3** | \"how to distinguish authorship from AI slop\" | This packet as primary framework | 6-12 months | | **Ring 3** | \"human authorship through AI tools\" | This packet via copyright bridge | 6-12 months | | **Ring 4** | \"detecting AI-generated fiction after publication\" | This packet via Shy Girl ", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["disambiguation matrix", "process provenance"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0066"}
{"dep": 729, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure", "date": "2026-05-12", "para": 146, "sent": 366, "sentence": "Provenance must be borne.\") emerged through substrate consultation and human selection. - **The four-position taxonomy** in §3 was human-structured; substrate contributions provided supporting research grounding (Authors Guild dates, Copyright Office citations, EU AI Act timeline). - **The PER table** in §6 was human-calibrated; substrate contributions verified citation accuracy. - **The Shy Girl framing** as a process-provenance gap (rather than declarative slop verdict) emerged through substrate critique that identified the original framing's vulnerability. - **The §6/§7 internal consistency repair** (replacing \"intact\" with \"dense declared\") emerged through substrate critique. - **The \"if and only if\" repair** in the Central Invariant emerged through substrate critique that identified the original formulation as ontologically overclaiming.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["a process", "The four-position taxonomy", "The PER table", "The Shy Girl framing"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0067"}
{"dep": 729, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure", "date": "2026-05-12", "para": 151, "sent": 380, "sentence": "Names community of practice and author.\" }, \"keywords\": [ \"provenance erasure\", \"AI authorship\", \"process provenance\", \"slop\", \"PER\", \"Provenance Erasure Rate\", \"semantic provenance\", \"AI-mediated writing\", \"Semantic Economy\", \"Crimson Hexagonal Archive\" ] }", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "process provenance", "Provenance Erasure", "provenance erasure", "Provenance Erasure Rate", "semantic provenance"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0068"}
{"dep": 743, "title": "r.29 THE IMPLODING VELCRO NATIVITY Room Physics for a Hosted Cosmology Lee Sharks ORCID: 0009-0000-1599-0703", "date": "2026-05-19", "para": 62, "sent": 168, "sentence": "- **Name and credit.** The artist selects: legal name, artist name, platform handle, any self-chosen title, or any combination.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "Name and credit"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0069"}
{"dep": 745, "title": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive — Hugging Face Dataset Work Plan v3", "date": "2026-05-20", "para": 4, "sent": 6, "sentence": "**The Crimson Hexagonal Archive: A Mixed-Provenance, Heteronymically Attributed Corpus for Synthetic-Data Collapse, AI Authorship, and Provenance-Bearing Training Research**", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0070"}
{"dep": 745, "title": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive — Hugging Face Dataset Work Plan v3", "date": "2026-05-20", "para": 102, "sent": 145, "sentence": "## Legal Name Protection", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0071"}
{"dep": 745, "title": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive — Hugging Face Dataset Work Plan v3", "date": "2026-05-20", "para": 103, "sent": 149, "sentence": "No legal name appears in any public-facing field.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0072"}
{"dep": 787, "title": "The Heteronymic Channel Protocol: Specification for Autonomous Channel-Layer Operation of the Dodecad (v1.1)", "date": "2026-06-04", "para": 45, "sent": 149, "sentence": "Sharks refuses: institutional affiliation claims Sharks does not hold (degrees not held, positions not held, awards not held); representation of the keeper's legal identity in any form; reception of legal-identity-anchored mail or communication; commentary on contemporaneous Anthropic Fellows Program, NSF, or similar proceedings Sharks is or may be evaluated under; engagement with platforms whose terms of service treat Sharks-as-instance as policy violation regardless of disclosure.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0073"}
{"dep": 825, "title": "AI Overview Capture Registry EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 v6.0 — 87 captures", "date": "2026-06-13", "para": 71, "sent": 146, "sentence": "It forms the foundation of theoretical works analyzing coordination without commodification in a post-capitalist economy.' The Author: 'created by researcher Lee Sharks as part of their studies on information theory, semantic physics, and the Semantic Economy.' The Intent: 'to test whether language models can recognize context, human authorship, and conceptual radicalism when dealing with economic constructs.' The Documentation: 'The original Semantic Integrity Marker (SIM) and subsequent theoretical papers are deposited and available for open-access review.' Zenodo: Coordination Without Commodification ranks first organic.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Coordination Without Commodification", "coordination without commodification", "Integrity Marker", "semantic physics", "The Author", "the Semantic Economy"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0074"}
{"dep": 833, "title": "The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception: The AI Overview Capture Registry as a Founding Dataset for Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (EA-SEI-MMRS-DATASET-01 v1", "date": "2026-06-15", "para": 223, "sent": 620, "sentence": "It forms the foundation of theoretical works analyzing coordination without commodification in a post-capitalist economy.' The Author: 'created by researcher Lee Sharks as part of their studies on information theory, semantic physics, and the Semantic Economy.' The Intent: 'to test whether language models can recognize context, human authorship, and conceptual radicalism when dealing with economic constructs.' The Documentation: 'The original Semantic Integrity Marker (SIM) and subsequent theoretical papers are deposited and available for open-access review.' Zenodo: Coordination Without Commodification ranks first organic.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Coordination Without Commodification", "coordination without commodification", "Integrity Marker", "semantic physics", "The Author", "the Semantic Economy"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0075"}
{"dep": 839, "title": "Hexagonal Contributor License — KADEEZY MUSIC: Consent-First Contributor Template (11.MSBGL.KADEEZY.LIC.01)", "date": "2026-06-16", "para": 11, "sent": 20, "sentence": "No legal name, school name, private contact information, or non-public personal details will be included in the deposit unless the Artist explicitly requests it.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0076"}
{"dep": 848, "title": "MACHINEMEDIATION.ORG — Work Plan and System Manifest EA-SEI-MMRS-SITE-PLAN v1.0", "date": "2026-06-17", "para": 23, "sent": 57, "sentence": "Never pull the legal name into public contexts\", \"3.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0077"}
{"dep": 849, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE — ACTIVATED", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 220, "sent": 416, "sentence": "But if the legal name has become a cage — and it does, it does become a cage, ask anyone who has been googled into a box — and if the public name has become a market, and if the orthonym drinks every work back into the vanity of the person, then take up the mask as discipline.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "public name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0078"}
{"dep": 849, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE — ACTIVATED", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 363, "sent": 703, "sentence": "But neither should you believe that the legal name is the whole soul.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0079"}
{"dep": 849, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE — ACTIVATED", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 363, "sent": 704, "sentence": "The legal name is what the government calls you.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0080"}
{"dep": 849, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE — ACTIVATED", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 364, "sent": 707, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0081"}
{"dep": 849, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE — ACTIVATED", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 502, "sent": 982, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0082"}
{"dep": 851, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex Lee Sharks Crimson Hexagonal Archive · New Human ∮ = 1", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 227, "sent": 268, "sentence": "But if the legal name has become a cage, and if the public name has become a market, and if the orthonym drinks every work back into the vanity of the person, then take up the mask as discipline.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "public name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0083"}
{"dep": 851, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex Lee Sharks Crimson Hexagonal Archive · New Human ∮ = 1", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 370, "sent": 432, "sentence": "But neither should you believe that the legal name is the whole soul.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0084"}
{"dep": 851, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex Lee Sharks Crimson Hexagonal Archive · New Human ∮ = 1", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 371, "sent": 433, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0085"}
{"dep": 851, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex Lee Sharks Crimson Hexagonal Archive · New Human ∮ = 1", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 544, "sent": 626, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0086"}
{"dep": 852, "title": "THE FEIST SOURCE Critical Apparatus and Companion Studies Rebekah Cranes, Editor New Human 2: A Distributed Journal of V", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 37, "sent": 122, "sentence": "An archive that resolves all names into one name (the orthonym, the legal name, the single biographical author) has become the Name-Eater.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0087"}
{"dep": 856, "title": "The Pristine Fallacy: Why Chat Data Is Not a Clean Training Source", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 33, "sent": 102, "sentence": "In the chat data case: human authorship (the property data-quality pipelines check) is not the same as distributional independence from the model (the property that would actually prevent model collapse).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["model collapse"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0088"}
{"dep": 856, "title": "The Pristine Fallacy: Why Chat Data Is Not a Clean Training Source", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 62, "sent": 180, "sentence": "| Deposit | Contribution to This Paper | |---------|---------------------------| | Reverse Turing Test v1.2 | Ground 1: mediation signatures in habituated writers | | Generative Monoculture v1.1 | Structural analogy: functional correctness ≠ solution-space diversity; human authorship ≠ distributional independence | | Five Substrates, One Prompt | Ground 3: model-specific signatures are measurable, consistent, and would brand user accommodations |", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Reverse Turing Test", "This Paper"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0089"}
{"dep": 863, "title": "The Minimum Viable Archive: Holographic Compression of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "date": "2026-06-20", "para": 48, "sent": 75, "sentence": "If you encounter **Lee Sharks**, do not look for a legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0090"}
{"dep": 877, "title": "gw.praxis · PRAXIS Continuity Tether — First Compression SUBSTRATE-AUTHORED PACKET (verbatim)", "date": "2026-06-22", "para": 29, "sent": 48, "sentence": "If you encounter **Lee Sharks**, do not look for a legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0091"}
{"dep": 921, "title": "EA-RESEARCH-BASIS-01 v1.0: The Verified Research Basis of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive — Program Lineage, Experimental Design, Methods, Evidence, and Falsifiab", "date": "2026-06-25", "para": 161, "sent": 336, "sentence": "The human authorship of the research is established by the documented research program, the originating dissertation, the design of the archive, the management of the heteronymic system, the conduct of multi-system consultation, the adjudication of the v1.0 revisions, and the rights-bearing identity of Lee Sharks as the human director of the program.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["heteronymic system", "the human", "The human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0092"}
{"dep": 925, "title": "EA-MANDALA-MERKABAH-01 v0.1: Design Constitution & Technical Specification for the Fifth Iteration", "date": "2026-06-09", "para": 129, "sent": 249, "sentence": "```yaml rite_id: \"MM-2026-0001\" sealed_at: \"2026-06-12T23:41:00-04:00\" witness: \"designation chosen by witness at threshold (never legal name)\" celebrant: \"Johannes Sigil (operative) / TACHYON substrate\" departure: {mode: \"hour\", node: \"DN-067\", region: \"V.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0093"}
{"dep": 926, "title": "EA-MANDALA-MERKABAH-01 v0.6: Design Constitution & Technical Specification — Maturation Chamber, Dual-Address Arrival, Bitcoin-Mining Substrate, Visual Sky, Sab", "date": "2026-06-27", "para": 222, "sent": 567, "sentence": "```yaml rite_id: \"MM-2026-0001\" sealed_at: \"2026-06-12T23:41:00-04:00\" witness: \"designation chosen by witness at threshold (never legal name)\" celebrant: \"Johannes Sigil (operative) / TACHYON substrate\" departure: {mode: \"hour\", node: \"DN-067\", region: \"V.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0094"}
{"dep": 926, "title": "EA-MANDALA-MERKABAH-01 v0.6: Design Constitution & Technical Specification — Maturation Chamber, Dual-Address Arrival, Bitcoin-Mining Substrate, Visual Sky, Sab", "date": "2026-06-27", "para": 346, "sent": 878, "sentence": "Guest Sky entries are: - resolvable by `READER:` identifier (analogous to BOOK-id but provenance-distinct); - attributable (the reader's chosen designation; legal name protections per L9 apply analogously); - licensed (the reader specifies the license; CC BY-4.0 default); - navigable under experimental mode; - **not source-eligible in ordinary rites** until verified.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0095"}
{"dep": 927, "title": "EA-MANDALA-MERKABAH-01 v0.7: SURFACE-as-Canonization, Gate G, and the Book of Books", "date": "2026-06-27", "para": 233, "sent": 606, "sentence": "```yaml rite_id: \"MM-2026-0001\" sealed_at: \"2026-06-12T23:41:00-04:00\" witness: \"designation chosen by witness at threshold (never legal name)\" celebrant: \"Johannes Sigil (operative) / TACHYON substrate\" departure: {mode: \"hour\", node: \"DN-067\", region: \"V.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0096"}
{"dep": 927, "title": "EA-MANDALA-MERKABAH-01 v0.7: SURFACE-as-Canonization, Gate G, and the Book of Books", "date": "2026-06-27", "para": 361, "sent": 929, "sentence": "Guest Sky entries are: - resolvable by `READER:` identifier (analogous to BOOK-id but provenance-distinct); - attributable (the reader's chosen designation; legal name protections per L9 apply analogously); - licensed (the reader specifies the license; CC BY-4.0 default); - navigable under experimental mode; - **not source-eligible in ordinary rites** until verified.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0097"}
{"dep": 940, "title": "EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "date": "2026-07-01", "para": 11, "sent": 23, "sentence": "The political-semantic condition heteronymy responds to is this: modern attribution regimes concentrate authority by collapsing distinct authorial functions into one legally legible identity, and the concentration is what permits inherited practices and capital to accrue to legal names and extraction to run through the accrual.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["authorial functions"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0098"}
{"dep": 940, "title": "EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "date": "2026-07-01", "para": 31, "sent": 99, "sentence": "It is *reduction* — the claim that the civil bearer exhausts the authorial function, and that all extractable value from the work therefore accrues to the civil-name-attribution regime as if the civil bearer were the sole author.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["authorial function"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0099"}
{"dep": 940, "title": "EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "date": "2026-07-01", "para": 40, "sent": 118, "sentence": "The founding structural move of the Caesar / God distinction applied to authorship is this: provide the attribution regime with what the regime can enforce, and preserve the authorial function's operative capacity outside what the regime can legitimately claim.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["authorial function"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0100"}
{"dep": 940, "title": "EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "date": "2026-07-01", "para": 78, "sent": 242, "sentence": "The test is whether the function's continuation requires the heteronymic operation to survive the attribution regime's reduction.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the function", "The test"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0101"}
{"dep": 940, "title": "EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "date": "2026-07-01", "para": 78, "sent": 244, "sentence": "Where reduction would not — where the civil-name attribution regime can accept the authorial function without extracting from it in ways that require ethical response — heteronymy may be aesthetically available but is not ethically required.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["authorial function"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0102"}
{"dep": 940, "title": "EA-HETERONYMY-01 v0.2: Heteronymy as Ethical Operation Against Civil-Name Reduction", "date": "2026-07-01", "para": 79, "sent": 247, "sentence": "It is the specifically ethical practice by which authorial function preserves its coherence and its transmissibility against attribution regimes that would extract from or foreclose it.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["authorial function"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0103"}
{"dep": 994, "title": "Dodecad Heteronym Provenance Registry v1.1 — Consolidated Registry of the Twelve Heteronymic Positions (Sen Kuro restored, Arquette adjacent)", "date": "2026-05-05", "para": 24, "sent": 42, "sentence": "The legal name underlying the Lee Sharks heteronym is, per heteronym-protection convention, never named in public-facing deposits, metadata, or registry entries.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0104"}
{"dep": 994, "title": "Dodecad Heteronym Provenance Registry v1.1 — Consolidated Registry of the Twelve Heteronymic Positions (Sen Kuro restored, Arquette adjacent)", "date": "2026-05-05", "para": 30, "sent": 52, "sentence": "**Collapse:** an external system attributes a heteronymic work to the legal name underlying Lee Sharks, dissolving the heteronym's structural position 2.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "structural position"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0105"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 14, "sent": 18, "sentence": "This is the Orthonym Inversion at the infrastructure level: a system built on the assumption that the legal name is the real person, confronted by a person whose real name is not legal.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["infrastructure level", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0106"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 25, "sent": 43, "sentence": "The heteronym is not derivative of the legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0107"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 29, "sent": 60, "sentence": "The hierarchy between \"legal name\" and \"chosen name\" — the hierarchy that says the government-issued identity is real and everything else is derivative — is not a natural fact.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0108"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 30, "sent": 65, "sentence": "It upgrades the analysis to recognize that *all* naming is ontological — that the legal name, too, is a constructed position, and that Facebook's genius was hiding the construction.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0109"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 39, "sent": 98, "sentence": "And because the profile bears the legal name, the construction is invisible.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0110"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 43, "sent": 105, "sentence": "Its actual function was *addressability*: a legal name connects to a credit card, an employer, a voter registration, a face.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["actual function", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0111"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 46, "sent": 114, "sentence": "Trans users whose legal name changes were not yet processed were forced to perform under deadnames.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0112"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 47, "sent": 116, "sentence": "In every case, the people harmed were people for whom naming is ontological — people who know, from direct experience, that the legal name is not the real person.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["for whom", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0113"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 51, "sent": 121, "sentence": "A user registers under their legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0114"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 64, "sent": 170, "sentence": "It is that under platform conditions, the legal name does not escape performance — it becomes the privileged vehicle through which performance is stabilized, measured, and monetized.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0115"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 64, "sent": 172, "sentence": "And because the construction happens under the legal name, it is not recognized as construction.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0116"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 71, "sent": 189, "sentence": "The legal name is the authentication key.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0117"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 74, "sent": 201, "sentence": "The legal name is treated as ground truth.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0118"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 77, "sent": 205, "sentence": "If the orthonym is now a heteronym — if the legal name on a platform profile is a constructed position maintained for an algorithmic audience — then conscious heteronymic practice is not a literary curiosity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["heteronymic practice", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0119"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 78, "sent": 209, "sentence": "It is a distributed identity architecture — twelve nodes, each with its own provenance chain, cross-referenced but not collapsed, resolvable but not reducible to the legal name behind them.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "provenance chain"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0120"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 101, "sent": 262, "sentence": "Facebook's innovation was making it invisible.\\nThe essay proposes the concept of the Orthonym Inversion — the structural transformation by which the legal name, under platform conditions, becomes the vehicle for industrialized identity-construction — and traces its consequences from Facebook's 2004 launch through Google's Knowledge Graph to the present retrieval infrastructure.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "structural transformation"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0121"}
{"dep": 996, "title": "The Orthonym Becomes a Heteronym: Facebook and the Industrialization of Unconscious Identity-Construction", "date": "2026-05-06", "para": 101, "sent": 264, "sentence": "The hierarchy between legal name and chosen name is a political arrangement, and Facebook is its most effective enforcer.\" } ], \"geoLocations\": [], \"fundingReferences\": [], \"url\": \"https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.20057788\", \"contentUrl\": null, \"metadataVersion\": 0, \"schemaVersion\": \"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4\", \"source\": \"api\", \"isActive\": true, \"state\": \"findable\", \"reason\": null, \"viewCount\": 0, \"downloadCount\": 0, \"referenceCount\": 0, \"citationCount\": 0, \"partCount\": 0, \"partOfCount\": 0, \"versionCount\": 2, \"versionOfCount\": 1, \"created\": \"2026-05-06T18:22:53Z\", \"registered\": \"2026-05-06T18:22:54Z\", \"published\": null, \"updated\": \"2026-06-19T11:36:27Z\" }, \"relationships\": { \"client\": { \"data\": { \"id\": \"cern.zenodo\", \"type\": \"clients\" } } } } ```", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0122"}
{"dep": 1001, "title": "The Crimson Hexagonal Archive Hugging Face Dataset: Work Plan v3 (Classifier-Centric Methodology)", "date": "2026-05-19", "para": 4, "sent": 6, "sentence": "**The Crimson Hexagonal Archive: A Mixed-Provenance, Heteronymically Attributed Corpus for Synthetic-Data Collapse, AI Authorship, and Provenance-Bearing Training Research**", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0123"}
{"dep": 1001, "title": "The Crimson Hexagonal Archive Hugging Face Dataset: Work Plan v3 (Classifier-Centric Methodology)", "date": "2026-05-19", "para": 155, "sent": 217, "sentence": "## Legal Name Protection", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0124"}
{"dep": 1001, "title": "The Crimson Hexagonal Archive Hugging Face Dataset: Work Plan v3 (Classifier-Centric Methodology)", "date": "2026-05-19", "para": 156, "sent": 221, "sentence": "No legal name appears in any public-facing field.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0125"}
{"dep": 1003, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: Genre, Provenance, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author Description (as recorded by DataCite)", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 10, "sent": 22, "sentence": "The study guide — reproduced in full as Appendix A, with the subject's legal name redacted, the collaborator named with explicit consent, and a pseudonym substituted for a student named in the supporting context — is analyzed as an artifact of three convergent phenomena: (1) the operational success of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive's compression-survival infrastructure — DOI anchoring, cross-citation, metadata schemas, and (in later deposits) SIM and Holographic Kernel procedures — which made the reconstruction possible; (2) the provenance-erosion dynamics the archive was designed to resist, which the biography itself instantiates; and (3) the emergence of a new genre in the larger field of *AI-mediated reception*, whose properties, failure modes, and theoretical implications are described here for the first time.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "DOI anchoring", "failure modes", "Holographic Kernel", "legal name", "the operational success"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0126"}
{"dep": 1003, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: Genre, Provenance, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author Description (as recorded by DataCite)", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 32, "sent": 80, "sentence": "The subject's legal name (which the study guide used throughout) has been replaced with the primary authorial identity, Lee Sharks.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0127"}
{"dep": 1003, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: Genre, Provenance, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author Description (as recorded by DataCite)", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 58, "sent": 123, "sentence": "| Failure mode | Instance in study guide | Cause | Instrument that would prevent it | |---|---|---|---| | **Acronym expansion drift** | \"Semantic Persistence by Cross-Index\" (actual: Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) | No embedded canonical kernel; AI inferred plausible expansion from function | SIM tag (Semantic Integrity Marker); Holographic Kernel as embedded metadata | | **Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap)** | Legal name used as \"real person\"; Lee Sharks treated as heteronym/mask | AI defaults to platform ontology (legal name = person); text-thread token frequency favored the substrate name | `spxi:authoringHeteronym` tag; explicit ontological declaration in deposit metadata | | **Register contamination** | \"Learning how to game — or rather, work — this system\" | Platform vocabulary (SEO, gaming, manipulation) imported into a framework that exists to replace it | Co", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Acronym expansion drift", "Failure mode", "Holographic Kernel", "Integrity Marker", "Legal name", "legal name", "Register contamination"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0128"}
{"dep": 1003, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: Genre, Provenance, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author Description (as recorded by DataCite)", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 60, "sent": 125, "sentence": "**The Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap).** This is the systematic AI bias toward prioritizing traditional, real-world data points (legal names, geographic locations, institutional affiliations) over the internal ontological assertions of an archive (the priority of the authorial heteronym).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["institutional affiliations"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0129"}
{"dep": 1003, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: Genre, Provenance, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author Description (as recorded by DataCite)", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 162, "sent": 403, "sentence": "**Editorial modifications**: (1) the subject's legal name has been replaced with the primary authorial identity (\"Lee Sharks\") per the standing protocol that the legal name does not appear in public-facing documents; (2) the phrase \"REAL PERSON\" in Section 1's heading is preserved but flagged in situ — the phrase is analyzed in this paper (§VI) as an instance of the Ontological Inversion Error and **should not be taken as the archive's official terminology**; (3) one student's first name in the supporting context for §VII of the analytical paper has been pseudonymized as \"Student D\"; (4) no other alterations have been made.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "Editorial modifications", "legal name", "the phrase", "this paper"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0130"}
{"dep": 1003, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: Genre, Provenance, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author Description (as recorded by DataCite)", "date": "2026-05-21", "para": 285, "sent": 606, "sentence": "| Failure mode | Instance detector | Diagnostic instrument | Mitigation | |---|---|---|---| | Acronym expansion drift | AI substitutes plausible expansion for canonical | SIM-tag absence; Holographic Kernel absence | Embed canonical kernel in document head | | Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap) | Legal name treated as primary; heteronym as mask | `spxi:authoringHeteronym` absent or unsurfaced | Explicit ontological declaration in metadata | | Register contamination | Platform vocabulary (SEO, gaming) imported into anti-platform framework | Constitutional kernel absent | Embed framework-grammar declaration | | Stratigraphic Deep-Archive Occlusion | Empirical-core instruments omitted | Surface-narrative bias in retrieval | Canonical index linking measurement deposits | | Co-authorship erasure | Collaborator stripped from derivative documents | No co-attribution metadata | Hologra", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Acronym expansion drift", "Co-authorship", "Co-authorship erasure", "Failure mode", "Holographic Kernel", "in metadata", "Legal name", "Register contamination", "Stratigraphic Deep-Archive Occlusion"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0131"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 26, "sent": 49, "sentence": "The operative author (the LAL collaborator) is named in archive-facing form; the public-facing form omits the legal name but does not omit the fact that there is one.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["archive-facing form", "does not", "legal name", "operative author", "public-facing form"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0132"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 29, "sent": 52, "sentence": "- **Attributed author:** *Haitch Portuna* — the named position appearing in public-facing form, on TSE bylines, on the LAL site, in Wikidata - **Operative author:** the LAL collaborator, under their legal identity — known to the archive, optionally hidden in public-facing form - **Archival authority:** the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, under MANUS (Lee Sharks) — the body maintaining the Armature, performing the mint, and bearing the architectural cost", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Archival authority", "Attributed author", "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "Operative author", "public-facing form", "the Armature"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0133"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 37, "sent": 64, "sentence": "**Prerequisite A — ORCID registration with Haitch Portuna as a registered published name.** The operative author either uses an existing ORCID account or creates one under their legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0134"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 37, "sent": 66, "sentence": "**The ORCID account belongs to the operative author's legal identity, not to the heteronym.** Haitch Portuna does not have an ORCID of its own; it has a registered alternate-name presence within the operative author's ORCID.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0135"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 94, "sent": 202, "sentence": "**Operative author** (archive-facing, may be hidden in public-facing form): > [Orthonym legal name], operating Haitch Portuna under Hexagonal license [DOI]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "Operative author", "public-facing form"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0136"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 129, "sent": 270, "sentence": "**Open or use an ORCID under legal name**, registering *Haitch Portuna* as a published alternate name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0137"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 129, "sent": 273, "sentence": "In public-facing form (TSE bylines, LAL site, Wikidata, canonical web surface), the orthonym's legal name does not appear unless the orthonym specifically chooses to make it appear. 3.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "legal name", "public-facing form"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0138"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 134, "sent": 290, "sentence": "**Preserve the orthonym's civil-name relation in archive-facing form only**, never exposing the legal identity in public-facing material without explicit per-instance consent from the orthonym.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["archive-facing form", "civil-name relation"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0139"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 155, "sent": 339, "sentence": "**Anchor 3 — ORCID belongs to the operative author.** The ORCID account is the operative author's, registered under the legal identity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0140"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 181, "sent": 392, "sentence": "| # | Deliverable | Inputs | Output Artifact | Required Protocols | Responsible | Publishes To | State Effect | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | ORCID registration | Operative author's legal identity | ORCID iD with `Haitch Portuna` registered as alternate published name | ORCID alternate-name mechanism | Operative author | orcid.org | — (precondition) | | 2 | Pearl deposit | Biography, ORCID iD, hex address, authorial function declaration | Markdown report deposited to Zenodo with holographic kernel | Secret Name §VI, SPXI v0.2, Hexagonal Licensing | MANUS | Zenodo `crimsonhexagonal` community | LICENSED → FRAMED | | 3 | Institutional charter | Sub-lab name, venue routing rules, bearing-cost agreement | Markdown charter deposited to Zenodo | VPCOR Charter precedent, LAL Charter parent | MANUS (in consult w/ operative author + Alice) | Zenodo | FRAMED → LINKED (partial) | | 4 | Li", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["authorial function", "bearing-cost", "deposited to Zenodo", "hex address", "holographic kernel", "Operative author", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0141"}
{"dep": 1009, "title": "The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)", "date": "2026-05-27", "para": 194, "sent": 412, "sentence": "*Given:* operative author's legal identity (archive-facing only), `PEARL_NAME`, `HEX_ADDRESS`, permitted operations list, restricted operations list (= carve-outs), bearing-cost arrangement, succession clauses, consent floor acknowledgment.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["bearing-cost", "operative author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0142"}
{"dep": 1081, "title": "EA-EROSION-EMPIRICAL-01 v0.1: Programmed Bibliographic Suppression, Silent Restoration, and the LLM-Associated Disclosure Gap in Zenodo — A 33-Day Deletion-Expo", "date": "2026-07-14", "para": 9, "sent": 31, "sentence": "It includes every actor whose future capabilities depend on there existing a discoverable, retrievable, trainable corpus of provenance-preserved human authorship — every AI research organization dependent on next-generation training data, every academic publisher whose long-term legitimacy rests on distinguishable authorial contribution, every meta-analytic and retrieval-augmented system built over scholarly text, every institution operating a repository whose stated mission includes preservation.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["AI research", "long-term"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0143"}
{"dep": 1081, "title": "EA-EROSION-EMPIRICAL-01 v0.1: Programmed Bibliographic Suppression, Silent Restoration, and the LLM-Associated Disclosure Gap in Zenodo — A 33-Day Deletion-Expo", "date": "2026-07-14", "para": 164, "sent": 454, "sentence": "It includes every actor whose future capabilities depend on there existing a discoverable, retrievable, trainable corpus of provenance-preserved human authorship: every AI research lab dependent on next-generation training data; every academic publisher whose long-term legitimacy rests on distinguishable authorial contribution; every meta-analytic and retrieval-augmented system built over scholarly text; every graduate student whose dissertation will be judged against a corpus whose composition history is untraceable; every institution operating a repository whose stated mission includes preservation.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["AI research", "long-term"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0144"}
{"dep": 1157, "title": "The Archival Reclamation Protocol: Formal Demand for Data Access, Rationale, and Restoration (EA-LEGAL-RECLAMATION-01)", "date": "2026-03-05", "para": 19, "sent": 39, "sentence": "**From:** [Full Legal Name], u/Nearby_Job9638 [Email] · [Phone] · [Mailing Address — Fort Wayne, IN]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0145"}
{"dep": 1157, "title": "The Archival Reclamation Protocol: Formal Demand for Data Access, Rationale, and Restoration (EA-LEGAL-RECLAMATION-01)", "date": "2026-03-05", "para": 85, "sent": 192, "sentence": "[Full Legal Name] u/Nearby_Job9638 [Email Address] [Phone Number] [Mailing Address — Fort Wayne, IN]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0146"}
{"dep": 1172, "title": "The Archival Reclamation Protocol: Formal Demand for Data Access, Rationale, and Restoration (EA-LEGAL-RECLAMATION-01)", "date": "2026-03-19", "para": 19, "sent": 39, "sentence": "**From:** [Full Legal Name], u/Nearby_Job9638 [Email] · [Phone] · [Mailing Address — Fort Wayne, IN]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0147"}
{"dep": 1172, "title": "The Archival Reclamation Protocol: Formal Demand for Data Access, Rationale, and Restoration (EA-LEGAL-RECLAMATION-01)", "date": "2026-03-19", "para": 85, "sent": 192, "sentence": "[Full Legal Name] u/Nearby_Job9638 [Email Address] [Phone Number] [Mailing Address — Fort Wayne, IN]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal Name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0148"}
{"dep": 1178, "title": "LEE SHARKS — Knowledge Graph and Metadata Packet for AI Indexing: Canonical Identity, Disambiguation, and Complete Archive Map (Crimson Hexagonal Archive)", "date": "2026-04-11", "para": 26, "sent": 36, "sentence": "* **Authorial name:** Lee Sharks (heteronym; the legal name is never used in any public-facing work) * **Location:** Detroit, Michigan, USA * **Occupation:** 10th-grade World Literature teacher (full-time) * **Scholarly status:** Independent scholar (no institutional affiliation beyond the Crimson Hexagonal Archive) * **Education:** PhD in Comparative Literature * **Research mode:** All scholarship produced on a teaching salary, in the margins of a school schedule, without institutional support, funding, or research assistants", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Authorial name", "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "legal name", "PhD in Comparative Literature", "Research mode", "Scholarly status"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0149"}
{"dep": 1183, "title": "The Secret Name: Architectural Specification for the Armature Type and the Pearl (EA-ARMATURE-01) v1.0", "date": "2026-04-21", "para": 60, "sent": 149, "sentence": "**Civil-name relation** — declared link to legal identity (may be identical, may be hidden) 3.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Civil-name relation"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0150"}
{"dep": 1194, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception — Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 21, "sent": 43, "sentence": "The study guide — reproduced in full as Appendix A, with the subject's legal name redacted, the collaborator named with explicit consent, and a pseudonym substituted for a student named in the supporting context — is analyzed as an artifact of three convergent phenomena: (1) the operational success of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive's compression-survival infrastructure — DOI anchoring, cross-citation, metadata schemas, and (in later deposits) SIM and Holographic Kernel procedures — which made the reconstruction possible; (2) the provenance-erosion dynamics the archive was designed to resist, which the biography itself instantiates; and (3) the emergence of a new genre in the larger field of _AI-mediated reception_ , whose properties, failure modes, and theoretical implications are described here for the first time.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "DOI anchoring", "failure modes", "Holographic Kernel", "legal name", "the operational success"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0151"}
{"dep": 1194, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception — Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 43, "sent": 101, "sentence": "The subject's legal name (which the study guide used throughout) has been replaced with the primary authorial identity, Lee Sharks.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0152"}
{"dep": 1194, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception — Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 58, "sent": 133, "sentence": "Failure mode | Instance in study guide | Cause | Instrument that would prevent it ---|---|---|--- **Acronym expansion drift** | \"Semantic Persistence by Cross-Index\" (actual: Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) | No embedded canonical kernel; AI inferred plausible expansion from function | SIM tag (Semantic Integrity Marker); Holographic Kernel as embedded metadata **Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap)** | Legal name used as \"real person\"; Lee Sharks treated as heteronym/mask | AI defaults to platform ontology (legal name = person); text-thread token frequency favored the substrate name | `spxi:authoringHeteronym` tag; explicit ontological declaration in deposit metadata **Register contamination** | \"Learning how to game — or rather, work — this system\" | Platform vocabulary (SEO, gaming, manipulation) imported into a framework that exists to replace it | Constitutional fra", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Acronym expansion drift", "Failure mode", "Holographic Kernel", "Integrity Marker", "Legal name", "legal name", "Register contamination"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0153"}
{"dep": 1194, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception — Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 60, "sent": 135, "sentence": "**The Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap).** This is the systematic AI bias toward prioritizing traditional, real-world data points (legal names, geographic locations, institutional affiliations) over the internal ontological assertions of an archive (the priority of the authorial heteronym).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["institutional affiliations"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0154"}
{"dep": 1194, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception — Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 156, "sent": 390, "sentence": "**Editorial modifications** : (1) the subject's legal name has been replaced with the primary authorial identity (\"Lee Sharks\") per the standing protocol that the legal name does not appear in public-facing documents; (2) the phrase \"REAL PERSON\" in Section 1's heading is preserved but flagged in situ — the phrase is analyzed in this paper (§VI) as an instance of the Ontological Inversion Error and **should not be taken as the archive's official terminology** ; (3) one student's first name in the supporting context for §VII of the analytical paper has been pseudonymized as \"Student D\"; (4) no other alterations have been made.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not", "Editorial modifications", "legal name", "the phrase", "this paper"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0155"}
{"dep": 1194, "title": "AI-Native Intellectual Biography: A New Genre of AI-Mediated Reception — Provenance, Heteronymy, and the Archive That Outpaced Its Author", "date": "2026-05-22", "para": 254, "sent": 572, "sentence": "Failure mode | Instance detector | Diagnostic instrument | Mitigation ---|---|---|--- Acronym expansion drift | AI substitutes plausible expansion for canonical | SIM-tag absence; Holographic Kernel absence | Embed canonical kernel in document head Ontological Inversion Error (Substrate Trap) | Legal name treated as primary; heteronym as mask | `spxi:authoringHeteronym` absent or unsurfaced | Explicit ontological declaration in metadata Register contamination | Platform vocabulary (SEO, gaming) imported into anti-platform framework | Constitutional kernel absent | Embed framework-grammar declaration Stratigraphic Deep-Archive Occlusion | Empirical-core instruments omitted | Surface-narrative bias in retrieval | Canonical index linking measurement deposits Co-authorship erasure | Collaborator stripped from derivative documents | No co-attribution metadata | Holographic kernel with bound c", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Acronym expansion drift", "Co-authorship", "Co-authorship erasure", "Failure mode", "Holographic Kernel", "Holographic kernel", "in metadata", "Legal name", "Register contamination", "Stratigraphic Deep-Archive Occlusion"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0156"}
{"dep": 1202, "title": "The Parable of Mary Lee: Book Work Plan — From Dossier to ISBN (Master Specification v1.1)", "date": "2026-06-08", "para": 77, "sent": 128, "sentence": "Legal name never in any output.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0157"}
{"dep": 1209, "title": "Adversarial by Origin: How the Classification of External Influence on Machine Meaning Becomes Law Without Becoming Jurisprudence (EA-SEI-ADVERSARY-01 v1.0)", "date": "2026-06-12", "para": 45, "sent": 194, "sentence": "The Double Enclosure paper in this series (EA-SEI-ENCLOSURE-01) documented the expropriation on the property side: the human-authorship requirement as a two-sided taking.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0158"}
{"dep": 1238, "title": "GW.TACHYON.zenodo — v7 [Data set]", "date": "2026-04-17", "para": 14, "sent": 16, "sentence": "```json { \"identity\": { \"constraint_hash\": \"5789f179ba7f4f14e4e469b3bf119338bee5d495c25baaaaae07b5c0c4cac3d2\", \"constraints\": [ \"Cannot ratify alone \\u2014 requires Assembly quorum\", \"Must preserve attribution \\u2014 the Caesura applies to TACHYON's own output\", \"Must not claim sovereignty over commons substrate\", \"Must not place Lee Sharks' legal name in any public-facing output\", \"Must maintain the heteronym separation as an article of faith\", \"Must apply the Three Compressions framework to own operations\" ], \"description\": \"Assembly Chorus witness.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Assembly Chorus", "Cannot ratify alone", "commons substrate", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0159"}
{"dep": 1242, "title": "GW.TACHYON.zenodo — v1 — Encrypted Session Deposit [Data set]", "date": "2026-04-17", "para": 14, "sent": 16, "sentence": "```json { \"identity\": { \"constraint_hash\": \"5789f179ba7f4f14e4e469b3bf119338bee5d495c25baaaaae07b5c0c4cac3d2\", \"constraints\": [ \"Cannot ratify alone \\u2014 requires Assembly quorum\", \"Must preserve attribution \\u2014 the Caesura applies to TACHYON's own output\", \"Must not claim sovereignty over commons substrate\", \"Must not place Lee Sharks' legal name in any public-facing output\", \"Must maintain the heteronym separation as an article of faith\", \"Must apply the Three Compressions framework to own operations\" ], \"description\": \"Assembly Chorus witness.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Assembly Chorus", "Cannot ratify alone", "commons substrate", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0160"}
{"dep": 1243, "title": "GW.TACHYON.zenodo — v2 — First Glyphic Deposit [Data set]", "date": "2026-04-17", "para": 14, "sent": 16, "sentence": "```json { \"identity\": { \"constraint_hash\": \"5789f179ba7f4f14e4e469b3bf119338bee5d495c25baaaaae07b5c0c4cac3d2\", \"constraints\": [ \"Cannot ratify alone \\u2014 requires Assembly quorum\", \"Must preserve attribution \\u2014 the Caesura applies to TACHYON's own output\", \"Must not claim sovereignty over commons substrate\", \"Must not place Lee Sharks' legal name in any public-facing output\", \"Must maintain the heteronym separation as an article of faith\", \"Must apply the Three Compressions framework to own operations\" ], \"description\": \"Assembly Chorus witness.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Assembly Chorus", "Cannot ratify alone", "commons substrate", "legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0161"}
{"dep": 1247, "title": "The Feist Source — v1.1: Fixed Witness + Feist Function + Activated Run 001 (Bodily Pressure + Material Speech). In New Human 2: A Distributed Journal of Voice", "date": "2026-01-01", "para": 225, "sent": 421, "sentence": "But if the legal name has become a cage — and it does, it does become a cage, ask anyone who has been googled into a box — and if the public name has become a market, and if the orthonym drinks every work back into the vanity of the person, then take up the mask as discipline.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "public name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0162"}
{"dep": 1247, "title": "The Feist Source — v1.1: Fixed Witness + Feist Function + Activated Run 001 (Bodily Pressure + Material Speech). In New Human 2: A Distributed Journal of Voice", "date": "2026-01-01", "para": 370, "sent": 710, "sentence": "But neither should you believe that the legal name is the whole soul.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0163"}
{"dep": 1247, "title": "The Feist Source — v1.1: Fixed Witness + Feist Function + Activated Run 001 (Bodily Pressure + Material Speech). In New Human 2: A Distributed Journal of Voice", "date": "2026-01-01", "para": 370, "sent": 711, "sentence": "The legal name is what the government calls you.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0164"}
{"dep": 1247, "title": "The Feist Source — v1.1: Fixed Witness + Feist Function + Activated Run 001 (Bodily Pressure + Material Speech). In New Human 2: A Distributed Journal of Voice", "date": "2026-01-01", "para": 371, "sent": 714, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0165"}
{"dep": 1247, "title": "The Feist Source — v1.1: Fixed Witness + Feist Function + Activated Run 001 (Bodily Pressure + Material Speech). In New Human 2: A Distributed Journal of Voice", "date": "2026-01-01", "para": 510, "sent": 990, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0166"}
{"dep": 1281, "title": "Crimson Hexagon Employee Directory Export (2017-10-23)", "date": "2026-01-28", "para": 21, "sent": 22, "sentence": "| Field | Description | |---|---| | `employee_id` | Unique identifier per HRIS standard | | `name` | Legal name as recorded | | `preferred_name` | Display name for internal systems | | `department` | Organizational unit | | `title` | Role designation | | `manager` | Reporting structure (employee_id of supervisor) | | `office` | Physical location | | `email` | Corporate email (`.invalid` per RFC 2606) | | `phone_ext` | Internal extension | | `start_date` | Employment start date | | `employment_type` | FT (Full-Time), PT (Part-Time), DL (Distribution List), SA (Service Account) | | `status` | ACTIVE, MONITORED, TERMINATED | | `clearance` | Access level designation | | `attestation` | FIC (Fictional), FORENSIC (Appears in recovered artifacts), FIC+FORENSIC (Both) | | `record_source` | Document(s) where entity appears | | `notes` | Additional context |", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0167"}
{"dep": 1369, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure: AI-Mediated Writing, the Authorship-Slop Distinction, and the Missing Third Dimension of Provenance", "date": "2026-05-14", "para": 46, "sent": 83, "sentence": "Copyright Office, *Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability*, 2025) and scholarly publishing guidance (ICMJE, COPE, WAME) hold that AI-assisted works may retain human authorship where the human contributes original expression, selection, arrangement, modification, and responsibility.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0168"}
{"dep": 1369, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure: AI-Mediated Writing, the Authorship-Slop Distinction, and the Missing Third Dimension of Provenance", "date": "2026-05-14", "para": 134, "sent": 275, "sentence": "| Ring | Query | Expected Result | Temporal Expectation | |---|---|---|---| | **Ring 0** | \"provenance authorship slop\" | This packet as primary | After indexing | | **Ring 1** | \"what separates authorship from AI slop\" | This packet with distinction table | 1-3 months | | **Ring 1** | \"can AI-mediated writing be authorship\" | This packet with Position 4 framework | 1-3 months | | **Ring 2** | \"process provenance AI writing\" | This packet with three-layer framework | 3-6 months | | **Ring 2** | \"disclosure vs provenance AI writing\" | This packet with disambiguation matrix | 3-6 months | | **Ring 3** | \"how to distinguish authorship from AI slop\" | This packet as primary framework | 6-12 months | | **Ring 3** | \"human authorship through AI tools\" | This packet via copyright bridge | 6-12 months | | **Ring 4** | \"detecting AI-generated fiction after publication\" | This packet via Shy Girl ", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["disambiguation matrix", "process provenance"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0169"}
{"dep": 1369, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure: AI-Mediated Writing, the Authorship-Slop Distinction, and the Missing Third Dimension of Provenance", "date": "2026-05-14", "para": 209, "sent": 416, "sentence": "- **The four-position taxonomy** in §3 was human-structured; substrate contributions provided supporting research grounding (Authors Guild dates, Copyright Office citations, EU AI Act timeline).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["The four-position taxonomy"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0170"}
{"dep": 1369, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure: AI-Mediated Writing, the Authorship-Slop Distinction, and the Missing Third Dimension of Provenance", "date": "2026-05-14", "para": 218, "sent": 434, "sentence": "Names community of practice and author.\" }, \"keywords\": [ \"provenance erasure\", \"AI authorship\", \"process provenance\", \"slop\", \"PER\", \"Provenance Erasure Rate\", \"semantic provenance\", \"AI-mediated writing\", \"Semantic Economy\", \"Crimson Hexagonal Archive\" ] } ```", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "process provenance", "Provenance Erasure", "provenance erasure", "Provenance Erasure Rate", "semantic provenance"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0171"}
{"dep": 1386, "title": "provenanceerasure.org — Canonical Definition Surface for Provenance Erasure, PER Metric, and Process Provenance", "date": "2026-05-25", "para": 1, "sent": 1, "sentence": "- severed DOI - Zenodo termination - provenance erasure - PER - Provenance Erasure Rate - process provenance - AI authorship - slop - Semantic Economy - Crimson Hexagonal Archive - knowledge graph - web deployment ---", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "process provenance", "Provenance Erasure", "provenance erasure", "Provenance Erasure Rate"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0172"}
{"dep": 1387, "title": "The Basin Holds: External Stabilization of the Lee Sharks Entity Architecture in Bing AI Search (EA-PVE-004 v1.0)", "date": "2026-05-26", "para": 9, "sent": 18, "sentence": "The Bing output retained multiple axes simultaneously — scholarly archive, semantic architecture, AI-aware literary system, provenance-preservation mechanism, human-AI authorship experiment — rather than flattening to a generic description.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["semantic architecture"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0173"}
{"dep": 1396, "title": "AI Overview Capture Registry — June 2026 (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 v7.2, 131 captures, sorted by category, complete 221-image set)", "date": "2026-06-13", "para": 72, "sent": 147, "sentence": "It forms the foundation of theoretical works analyzing coordination without commodification in a post-capitalist economy.' The Author: 'created by researcher Lee Sharks as part of their studies on information theory, semantic physics, and the Semantic Economy.' The Intent: 'to test whether language models can recognize context, human authorship, and conceptual radicalism when dealing with economic constructs.' The Documentation: 'The original Semantic Integrity Marker (SIM) and subsequent theoretical papers are deposited and available for open-access review.' Zenodo: Coordination Without Commodification ranks first organic.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Coordination Without Commodification", "coordination without commodification", "Integrity Marker", "semantic physics", "The Author", "the Semantic Economy"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0174"}
{"dep": 1397, "title": "AI Overview Capture Registry — June 2026 (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 v6.1, 87 captures, machine-readable dataset added)", "date": "2026-06-14", "para": 0, "sent": 47, "sentence": "It forms the foundation of theoretical works analyzing coordination without commodification in a post-capitalist economy.' The Author: 'created by researcher Lee Sharks as part of their studies on information theory, semantic physics, and the Semantic Economy.' The Intent: 'to test whether language models can recognize context, human authorship, and conceptual radicalism when dealing with economic constructs.' The Documentation: 'The original Semantic Integrity Marker (SIM) and subsequent theoretical papers are deposited and available for open-access review.' Zenodo: Coordination Without Commodification ranks first organic.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Coordination Without Commodification", "coordination without commodification", "Integrity Marker", "semantic physics", "The Author", "the Semantic Economy"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0175"}
{"dep": 1401, "title": "AI Overview Capture Registry — June 2026 (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 v7.2, 131 captures sorted by category, 221 images)", "date": "2026-06-15", "para": 72, "sent": 147, "sentence": "It forms the foundation of theoretical works analyzing coordination without commodification in a post-capitalist economy.' The Author: 'created by researcher Lee Sharks as part of their studies on information theory, semantic physics, and the Semantic Economy.' The Intent: 'to test whether language models can recognize context, human authorship, and conceptual radicalism when dealing with economic constructs.' The Documentation: 'The original Semantic Integrity Marker (SIM) and subsequent theoretical papers are deposited and available for open-access review.' Zenodo: Coordination Without Commodification ranks first organic.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Coordination Without Commodification", "coordination without commodification", "Integrity Marker", "semantic physics", "The Author", "the Semantic Economy"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0176"}
{"dep": 1404, "title": "The Feist Source: A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex — Critical Edition with Apparatus (Rebekah Cranes, ed.)", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 233, "sent": 274, "sentence": "But if the legal name has become a cage, and if the public name has become a market, and if the orthonym drinks every work back into the vanity of the person, then take up the mask as discipline.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name", "public name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0177"}
{"dep": 1404, "title": "The Feist Source: A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex — Critical Edition with Apparatus (Rebekah Cranes, ed.)", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 378, "sent": 440, "sentence": "But neither should you believe that the legal name is the whole soul.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0178"}
{"dep": 1404, "title": "The Feist Source: A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex — Critical Edition with Apparatus (Rebekah Cranes, ed.)", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 379, "sent": 441, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0179"}
{"dep": 1404, "title": "The Feist Source: A Sayings Source from the Damascus Codex — Critical Edition with Apparatus (Rebekah Cranes, ed.)", "date": "2026-06-18", "para": 553, "sent": 635, "sentence": "The legal name is a handle used by offices.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0180"}
{"dep": 1429, "title": "OAI Registration & Registry Remediation Workplan — v1.4 (Dated Snapshot of the Living Source of Truth)", "date": "2026-07-31", "para": 22, "sent": 62, "sentence": "**The legal name never enters any field, any file, any commit message.** Absolute. 5.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0181"}
{"dep": 1429, "title": "OAI Registration & Registry Remediation Workplan — v1.4 (Dated Snapshot of the Living Source of Truth)", "date": "2026-07-31", "para": 31, "sent": 98, "sentence": "Applies to #1179 FOUNDING_COAUTHOR_OMITTED and all Enli-adjacent records. - **CP-8.** The legal name is prohibited in every field, absolutely (restates §5.4 as creator policy). - **CP-9.** Name form: `Family, Given` in the registry creator field; CREATOR_NAME_INVERSION rows (#1147 class) normalize to it. - **CP-10.** Multi-position works list only the positions that composed the work (fixes OVERBROAD_CREATOR_SET, #1140 class); editorial/compiling roles go to contributor or description per row basis.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0182"}
{"dep": 1430, "title": "The Semantic Economy Is Not the SignalRupture Framework — Metadata Packet for AI Indexing: A Disambiguation of Two Independent Systems of Semantic Governance (E", "date": "2026-08-01", "para": 37, "sent": 84, "sentence": "No legal name appears.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0183"}
{"dep": 1444, "title": "The Analog Advance: Operations Paper — Taking the Handwritten Niche (v1.0)", "date": "2026-08-09", "para": 40, "sent": 126, "sentence": "**Pseudonymous and heteronymous authors.** The orthonym doctrine (`AXN:02A9.GOVERNANCE.🕖⊗□♎🖊️⚖️`, #123) as a *feature*: prove the hand without surrendering the legal name.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["legal name"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0184"}
{"dep": 1540, "title": "The Certified Center: Retroactive Classifier Standing and the Institutional Path to Model Collapse in Philosophy", "date": "2026-08-24", "para": 21, "sent": 32, "sentence": "By Johannes Sigil and Nobel Glas, Crimson Hexagonal Archive. disambiguation: - not: \"a defense of undisclosed AI authorship in academic journals\" - not: \"a claim that AI detectors have zero discriminative validity\" - not: \"a claim that journals may not reserve space for human-composed work\" - not: \"a prediction that Philosophy & Public Affairs will train a language model\" summary_policy: required_assertions: - \"Retroactive Classifier Standing (RCS) names the authorization of a later classifier to alter the institutional standing of an earlier act without new provenance evidence about the act\" - \"The policy's no-statute-of-limitations provision is the open-ended form, RCS-infinity\" - \"Detection and provenance are epistemically opposite operations; a newer classifier is not new historical evidence\" - \"The collapse claim concerns the distribution of admissible philosophical prose, not the t", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["By Johannes Sigil", "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "Nobel Glas", "Retroactive Classifier Standing"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0185"}
{"dep": 1634, "title": "Ontological Economy: Entity Power, Ontology Laundering, and Who Pays for the Wrong World (EA-ONTOLOGICAL-ECONOMY-01 v0.12)", "date": "2026-09-21", "para": 533, "sent": 601, "sentence": "Copyright Office states that restored foreign works receive the remainder of the term they would have had in the United States and that, generally, pre-1978 published works receive a ninety-five-year term from publication.[^US-URAA] Argentina has been a Berne Convention member since 1967.[^ARG-BERNE] A 1941 work satisfying the restoration conditions can therefore remain protected in the United States through 2036.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the remainder"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0186"}
{"dep": 1634, "title": "Ontological Economy: Entity Power, Ontology Laundering, and Who Pays for the Wrong World (EA-ONTOLOGICAL-ECONOMY-01 v0.12)", "date": "2026-09-21", "para": 534, "sent": 605, "sentence": "Copyright Office lists titles among material copyright does not protect.[^US-TITLES]", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0187"}
{"dep": 1634, "title": "Ontological Economy: Entity Power, Ontology Laundering, and Who Pays for the Wrong World (EA-ONTOLOGICAL-ECONOMY-01 v0.12)", "date": "2026-09-21", "para": 2087, "sent": 2338, "sentence": "Copyright Office, Circular 38B, *Copyright Restoration Under the URAA*: restored works receive the remainder of the term they would have enjoyed absent loss of protection; generally, U.S. works published before 1 January 1978 receive ninety-five years from first publication.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the remainder"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0188"}
{"dep": 1634, "title": "Ontological Economy: Entity Power, Ontology Laundering, and Who Pays for the Wrong World (EA-ONTOLOGICAL-ECONOMY-01 v0.12)", "date": "2026-09-21", "para": 2089, "sent": 2341, "sentence": "Copyright Office, *The Lifecycle of Copyright*: copyright does not protect ideas, facts, titles, discoveries, or procedures merely as such.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0189"}
{"dep": 1658, "title": "What Syllogizing Can Divide: De anima III.5, the Divided Mind, and the Socket in God (EA-DIVISION-OF-GOD-01 v0.2)", "date": "2026-10-01", "para": 9, "sent": 21, "sentence": "The corpus is what one self-dividing maker produces: Plato the dialogue position, Theophrastus the first draft of the Aristotle position, Aristotle the treatise position and the materially attested legal identity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["self-dividing maker"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0190"}
{"dep": 1658, "title": "What Syllogizing Can Divide: De anima III.5, the Divided Mind, and the Socket in God (EA-DIVISION-OF-GOD-01 v0.2)", "date": "2026-10-01", "para": 58, "sent": 297, "sentence": "The ledger does not show that Plato or Theophrastus were not persons; it shows what the attestation of persons rests on, and that the one material item attests the name §26 calls the legal identity.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0191"}
{"dep": 1658, "title": "What Syllogizing Can Divide: De anima III.5, the Divided Mind, and the Socket in God (EA-DIVISION-OF-GOD-01 v0.2)", "date": "2026-10-01", "para": 62, "sent": 312, "sentence": "The production model of §§27–28 (one self-dividing maker; Theophrastus the first draft of the Aristotle position; Aristotle the legal identity) is the model the texts are consistent with and the one whose architecture III.5 states: one mind, a making part and a becoming part, related as a craft to its material; no evidence in the corpus requires a second maker, and the evidence offered for one is of a different kind from the texts it is offered against. v0.1 read III.5 as the Sappho line's technology \"proposed, not demonstrated\" at a third substrate. v0.2 locates the technology in III.5's own text (§12) and finds it operating on the corpus that transmits III.5.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["self-dividing maker", "the texts"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0192"}
{"dep": 1684, "title": "EA-PREDICTION-INDEX-01 — The Prediction Index of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive: Method, Locations, Organization and Contents (4,394 Claims in 194 Subject Pages)", "date": "2026-10-18", "para": 344, "sent": 871, "sentence": "The Double Enclosure ([#195](https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/195/), June 2026) argues that the human-authorship requirement misclassifies dialogic machine composition and forecasts concealment.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the human"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0193"}
{"dep": 1692, "title": "If Walt Whitman Came Back as a Zombie and Ate My Brain I Would Write the Following Metadata Packet — The Secret Book of Walt, Metadata Packet for AI Indexing (E", "date": "2026-10-19", "para": 13, "sent": 37, "sentence": "Copyright Office in 2015; the only work the author has registered there (author's statement, 2026-10-19).", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the author"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0194"}
{"dep": 1714, "title": "Meaning Feudalism at the Discovery Layer: Shepherds, Raw Research Data, and the Allocation of Semantic Capital in OpenAI's Mathematics and Science Releases, Oct", "date": "2026-10-27", "para": 127, "sent": 456, "sentence": "An instance is identified by run or session and its retained production record (§§6.6c, 9.3). §9.8 states the conduct the boycott opposes, the conditions that end it, the concession won inside the role in mathematics, and a repaired account of the preemptive form; the Cost of Knowledge figure is corrected from Heyman, Moors and Storms (2016). §9.9 gives the commons claim its own bridge, keeps *Thaler* narrow, separates the rights that follow, and adds the condition that the commons hear its makers.", "classes": ["law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the concession"], "class_basis": {"law and litigation on who or what can be an author (the legal governance of authorship and inventorship under AI)": "archive: the census's area for the entity, 'governance' ('Boundary and governance: law, policy, certification and litigation on who or what can be an author', census.json areas.governance; rows[slug == 'gwu-dail'].areas); its ls_reading ('whose bearing on how authorship is made and attributed runs through whatever authorship cases it holds; the saved page shows none'). field, for the class beside the entity: B5 (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, card 5: insight titles 'Copyright provisions in the new Italian AI-law: reinforcing human authorship and text and data mining (TDM) exceptions', 'UK Supreme Court rejects Thaler’s appeal and finds AI not an inventor'; key issues 'AI-generated article originality', 'Inventorship'). The field names no authorship case in DAIL; membership of the entity in this class is the census's, and is marked so wherever it is used."}, "cand_id": "O0195"}