{"dep": 725, "title": "Provenance After AI Metadata Packet for Disambiguation: From Artifact Authenticity to Licensing Audit to Semantic Provenance", "date": "2026-05-08", "para": 96, "sent": 226, "sentence": "provenance; semantic provenance; provenance after AI; Provenance Erasure Rate; PER; provenance as value-form; ancestral provenance; futural provenance; C2PA; Content Credentials; Content Authenticity Initiative; CAI; Data Provenance Initiative; DPI; EU AI Act Article 50; W3C PROV; data lineage; NIST AI RMF; model cards; dataset cards; watermarking; AI attribution; archival science; digital preservation; chain of custody; AI synthesis; RAG evaluation; model collapse; Semantic Economy; Provenance Alignment; EA-PA-01; Lee Sharks; Crimson Hexagonal Archive ### 8.2 Negative keywords", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["Archive", "Crimson Hexagonal", "Lee Sharks"], "cand_id": "R0001"}
{"dep": 729, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure", "date": "2026-05-12", "para": 26, "sent": 50, "sentence": "| Layer | Object | Question It Answers | Existing Framework | Sufficient? | |---|---|---|---|---| | **Artifact provenance** | The file | Was this text really created by this person at this time? | C2PA, Content Credentials, cryptographic signing | Necessary, insufficient | | **Semantic provenance** | The meaning lineage | Whose ideas, sources, and labor does this text carry forward? | PER, PE-SE framework, citation systems | Necessary, insufficient | | **Process provenance** | The composition history | What did the human do, and what did the AI do? | Emerging only (ATS, Proof of Process, \"Who Owns the Text?\") | The missing layer |", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["labor"], "cand_id": "R0002"}
{"dep": 1190, "title": "Provenance After AI: Semantic Provenance and the Provenance Erasure Rate as Extension of C2PA, Data Provenance Initiative, and EU AI Act Frameworks (v1.1)", "date": "2026-05-12", "para": 0, "sent": 0, "sentence": "--- deposit_number: 1190 hex: 04B7 title: \"Provenance After AI: Semantic Provenance and the Provenance Erasure Rate as Extension of C2PA, Data Provenance Initiative, and EU AI Act Frameworks (v1.1)\" creator: Lee Sharks orcid: 0009-0000-1599-0703 date: 2026-05-12 content_type: Recovered blog-canonical work (full text; queue restoration 2026-07-19) license: CC-BY-4.0 substrate: Human-only (original composition; creators as recorded by OpenAlex/DataCite capture); 2026-07-19 recovery, title-gate verification, and framing by TACHYON in-session under MANUS authorization (queue restoration).", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["Lee Sharks", "TACHYON"], "cand_id": "R0003"}
{"dep": 1190, "title": "Provenance After AI: Semantic Provenance and the Provenance Erasure Rate as Extension of C2PA, Data Provenance Initiative, and EU AI Act Frameworks (v1.1)", "date": "2026-05-12", "para": 130, "sent": 253, "sentence": "provenance; semantic provenance; provenance after AI; Provenance Erasure Rate; PER; provenance as value-form; ancestral provenance; futural provenance; C2PA; Content Credentials; Content Authenticity Initiative; CAI; Data Provenance Initiative; DPI; EU AI Act Article 50; W3C PROV; data lineage; NIST AI RMF; model cards; dataset cards; watermarking; AI attribution; archival science; digital preservation; chain of custody; AI synthesis; RAG evaluation; model collapse; Semantic Economy; Provenance Alignment; EA-PA-01; Lee Sharks; Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["Archive", "Crimson Hexagonal", "Lee Sharks"], "cand_id": "R0004"}
{"dep": 1369, "title": "Provenance Is What Authorship Must Endure: AI-Mediated Writing, the Authorship-Slop Distinction, and the Missing Third Dimension of Provenance", "date": "2026-05-14", "para": 34, "sent": 57, "sentence": "| Layer | Object | Question It Answers | Existing Framework | Sufficient? | |---|---|---|---|---| | **Artifact provenance** | The file | Was this text really created by this person at this time? | C2PA, Content Credentials, cryptographic signing | Necessary, insufficient | | **Semantic provenance** | The meaning lineage | Whose ideas, sources, and labor does this text carry forward? | PER, PE-SE framework, citation systems | Necessary, insufficient | | **Process provenance** | The composition history | What did the human do, and what did the AI do? | Emerging only (ATS, Proof of Process, \"Who Owns the Text?\") | The missing layer |", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["labor"], "cand_id": "R0005"}
{"dep": 1386, "title": "provenanceerasure.org — Canonical Definition Surface for Provenance Erasure, PER Metric, and Process Provenance", "date": "2026-05-25", "para": 22, "sent": 64, "sentence": "Measures whom the provenance loss falls on. Ω ≈ 0 is unconditioned loss; Ω > 0 is power-conditioned stripping.\", \"sameAs\": \"https://www.alexanarch.org/go/?doi=10.5281/zenodo.20558196\"}, {\"@type\": \"DefinedTerm\", \"name\": \"Atomic Token Rule\", \"description\": \"Precondition for PER and Ω under substrate-side audits: referentially closed designating descriptions are single source-coordinates and cannot be decomposed into lexical constituents during audit.\"}, {\"@type\": \"DefinedTerm\", \"name\": \"process provenance\", \"description\": \"The third dimension alongside artifact provenance (C2PA) and semantic provenance (PER).", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["alexanarch"], "cand_id": "R0006"}
{"dep": 1409, "title": "EA-SPXI-ANALOG-01: Machine-Eligible Handwritten Artifacts (v1.2, reissued 2026-10-22; v1.0 edition of record 2026-07-21)", "date": "2026-07-21", "para": 87, "sent": 293, "sentence": "Doctrine: an archive of attested, biometrically continuous, hash-chained, C2PA-captured manuscripts constitutes a Non-Synthetic Reserve — a certified deposit of human tokens in an economy flooding with uncertifiable ones.", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["archive"], "cand_id": "R0007"}
{"dep": 1409, "title": "EA-SPXI-ANALOG-01: Machine-Eligible Handwritten Artifacts (v1.2, reissued 2026-10-22; v1.0 edition of record 2026-07-21)", "date": "2026-07-21", "para": 117, "sent": 403, "sentence": "An artifact certifies AIA-2 when ALL hold: ☐ Mandatory membrane present (G.1, five fields, in-pixel). ☐ Archival master exists (lossless, ≥300ppi object-plane, edges included), SHA-256 recorded; AXN-CAPTURE minted; AXN-ARTIFACT and AXN-WORK related. ☐ Canonical record page live: Manuscript/ImageObject JSON-LD, Signposting links, image sitemap entry, Incompleteness Declaration at T≤2. ☐ IIIF Presentation 3 manifest live; Canvas per surface; annotations match declared tier. ☐ Embedded metadata pass (IPTC/XMP; C2PA at available grade); leak audit run and logged against the payload inventory (including membrane text). ☐ ≥1 body SIM (ink-only tracer) verified web-unique at publication. ☐ Attestation artifact published (in-frame clock or equivalent). ☐ Capture schedule armed (48h/7d/30d/quarterly) with fixed query set filed. ☐ Custody: IA mirror + Wayback snapshot of the record page.", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["surface"], "cand_id": "R0008"}
{"dep": 1409, "title": "EA-SPXI-ANALOG-01: Machine-Eligible Handwritten Artifacts (v1.2, reissued 2026-10-22; v1.0 edition of record 2026-07-21)", "date": "2026-07-21", "para": 205, "sent": 636, "sentence": "***Content-authenticity engineering.*** The industry's parallel effort — C2PA content credentials binding capture-time assertions into media files; content-addressed storage in the Merkle tradition — shares this specification's hash discipline and differs in trust anchor: C2PA anchors in device and issuer certificates, while the AXN regime anchors in content derivation plus an archive's public ledger, with the display-glyph checksum added so that integrity is legible to human readers as well as verifiers.", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["archive"], "cand_id": "R0009"}
{"dep": 1444, "title": "The Analog Advance: Operations Paper — Taking the Handwritten Niche (v1.0)", "date": "2026-08-09", "para": 3, "sent": 7, "sentence": "It maps the incumbency ring — ARK, DOI/IGSN, Trismegistos, C2PA, accession practice — and defines the open ground as the living author whose composition layer makes origination deniable; states the positioning claim (the identifier for the hand that must prove itself to machines); specifies the thirty-minute enrollment path; scopes four schema deltas as an addendum rather than a spec reopening; defines a ten-item reference corpus, a four-page product-surface wing with browser-side verification, and two near-term empirical batteries (recapture stability; glyph transmission survival); sequences five adoption constituencies with institutions last; and closes with a gated ninety-day order whose final gate is the first enrolled hand belonging to neither founding depositor.", "alias": ["\\bC2PA\\b"], "objects": ["surface"], "cand_id": "R0010"}