{
 "row": "berkeley-negotiating-tech",
 "address": "Negotiating Tech",
 "entity": "Negotiating Tech: An Inventory of U.S. Union Contract Provisions for the Digital Age, the searchable inventory of how U.S. unions have addressed workplace technologies through collective bargaining (more than 175 agreements from a review of over 500; over 950 technology-related provisions), researched and developed by Lisa Kresge as a project of the UC Berkeley Labor Center's Technology and Work Program, last updated 2 July 2025 (laborcenter.berkeley.edu/negotiating-tech/); formalized in the Labor Vector meta-aggregator record of 2026-10-29 (laborvector.org/aggregators/berkeley-negotiating-tech/, editor Lee Sharks); individual salary and offer negotiation in the technology industry, which the Overview composed at the name, kept as a distinct entity (a homonym of the phrase kind)",
 "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.7 §3.4 (D/R/O), working; not frozen",
 "config": {
  "row": "berkeley-negotiating-tech",
  "address": "Negotiating Tech",
  "addresses": [
   "Negotiating Tech"
  ],
  "entity": "Negotiating Tech: An Inventory of U.S. Union Contract Provisions for the Digital Age, the searchable inventory of how U.S. unions have addressed workplace technologies through collective bargaining (more than 175 agreements from a review of over 500; over 950 technology-related provisions), researched and developed by Lisa Kresge as a project of the UC Berkeley Labor Center's Technology and Work Program, last updated 2 July 2025 (laborcenter.berkeley.edu/negotiating-tech/); formalized in the Labor Vector meta-aggregator record of 2026-10-29 (laborvector.org/aggregators/berkeley-negotiating-tech/, editor Lee Sharks); individual salary and offer negotiation in the technology industry, which the Overview composed at the name, kept as a distinct entity (a homonym of the phrase kind)",
  "row_type": "C (public entity: a searchable inventory of U.S. union contract provisions on workplace technology; Labor Vector intersections worker-power and ai-governing-labor, evidence kind 'negotiated provision')",
  "aliases": [
   {
    "pattern": "\\bNegotiating Tech\\b",
    "flags": "i"
   },
   {
    "pattern": "laborcenter\\.berkeley\\.edu",
    "flags": "i"
   },
   {
    "pattern": "\\bLisa\\s+Kresge\\b",
    "flags": ""
   },
   {
    "pattern": "\\b(UC\\s+)?Berkeley\\s+Labor\\s+Center\\b",
    "flags": "i"
   },
   {
    "pattern": "\\bCenter for Labor Research and Education\\b",
    "flags": "i"
   }
  ],
  "classes": [
   {
    "term": "collective bargaining over workplace technology (union contract provisions)",
    "pattern": "\\b(collective bargaining|collective agreements?|union contracts?|(collective )?bargaining agreements?|technological change clauses?|contract provisions?)\\b",
    "flags": "i",
    "basis": "field: B1/B2 (laborcenter.berkeley.edu/negotiating-tech/, title: 'Negotiating Tech: An Inventory of U.S. Union Contract Provisions for the Digital Age'; Overview: 'This searchable inventory documents how unions have addressed workplace technologies through collective bargaining.'; section 2: 'contract provisions that establish union and worker rights when employers introduce new or modified technologies'). The census's intersection 'worker-power' ('bargaining, organizing, consent, refusal, contestation and enforceable protections') and evidence kind 'negotiated provision' for the entity, as the field states them."
   },
   {
    "term": "employer governance of work through technology (electronic monitoring and surveillance, HR and workforce management systems)",
    "pattern": "\\b(electronic monitoring|workplace surveillance|worker surveillance|surveillance of workers|bossware|algorithmic management|workforce management systems?|automated (monitoring|management|discipline))\\b",
    "flags": "i",
    "basis": "field: B1/B2 (section 4: 'collective bargaining provisions that govern the use of workplace technologies, including electronic monitoring and surveillance, HR and workforce management systems, and job-related digital tools'; FAQ: 'keyword searches focused on terms such as surveillance, monitoring, and automation'). The census's intersection 'ai-governing-labor' ('hiring, surveillance, scheduling, quotas, evaluation and discipline') for the entity, as the field states it."
   }
  ],
  "classes_note": "Two classes, sourced from the field by locus (B1, the card, and B2, the census's saved copy of the same page, hold one text): the inventory as a record of collective bargaining over workplace technology, its unit the union contract provision (title; Overview; sections 2 and 3), which is the census's intersection 'worker-power' and evidence kind 'negotiated provision' as the field states them; and the object those provisions govern, employer use of technology to monitor and manage work (section 4; FAQ on keyword search), which is the census's intersection 'ai-governing-labor' as the field states it. The census's kind, 'searchable inventory', is the field's own phrase ('This searchable inventory') but names no class the archive could apply a category to, and is not run. The archive's instruments of labor direction (Directionality of Semantic Labor, #771; the directionality stack; user labor drag) are the census's lv_intersection, an archive reading, and are not run as classes: no field source places the inventory under them (brief addendum, item 7); where a candidate applies them to a sourced class it is read. The aliases are the entity's short name (the address), its host, its compiler (Lisa Kresge, B1 'researched and developed by Lisa Kresge'), and its operator under both names (UC Berkeley Labor Center; Center for Labor Research and Education, B1 citation). The phrase 'negotiating tech' as salary negotiation is a homonym and not an alias; the alias pattern will meet it, and reading rejects it. Admission by reading (§3.4): a candidate is admitted when its sentence or paragraph makes a claim bearing on the inventory, or applies an archive category to collective bargaining over workplace technology, or to employer governance of work through technology, as a class; a bare mention of collective bargaining or of surveillance in another sense (state, platform or retrieval surveillance; bargaining as a figure) is not a claim on the entity or its classes.",
  "exclude_deposits": [],
  "notes": "entity-keyed pass, 2026-10-29, on the briefs rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v09/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-AGGREGATOR.md and BRIEF-NEW-ROW-LABOR.md; address 'Negotiating Tech' (negotiating-tech-aio-20261029, OBS-d0620e198fd2, ADDR-f795031fe53d), Google AI Overview (expanded), signed out, incognito. The archive's own records of the entity (the Capture Registry's findings, reading and analysis at the capture; the Labor Vector census record) are ledgered beside the deposits as CAP-1-NN and LV-NN. Second pass: hop_from [239], the one deposit admitted by reading (O-class, collective bargaining).",
  "hop_from": [
   239
  ]
 },
 "texts_scanned": 1712,
 "counts": {
  "D_sentences": 0,
  "D_deposits": 0,
  "R_sentences": 0,
  "R_deposits": 0,
  "O_direct": 0,
  "O_class": 3,
  "O_deposits": 3,
  "H_candidates": 50
 },
 "per_deposit": {
  "D": {},
  "R": {},
  "O": {
   "83": 1,
   "159": 1,
   "239": 1
  }
 },
 "registry_entity_triples": [],
 "integrity_S5": [],
 "sha256": {
  "candidates-D.jsonl": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855",
  "candidates-R.jsonl": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855",
  "candidates-O.jsonl": "0fdea70a026556adb2d7f5a5746684346788d871d909af857a224b0ec05bd167",
  "candidates-H.jsonl": "d239ab955e93db770e032c84f59570223a19883a8bd31729e721ef733c76bd01"
 },
 "category_vocabulary": {
  "defines_concepts_and_lexical_mints": 11067
 },
 "note": "Candidates by string only. Admission by reading, recorded in the row's reading file; nothing here is admitted."
}