{ "row": "aeovision-geo-papers", "pass": "first reading and hop, 2026-10-29", "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 §3.4 D/R/O (working; not frozen). The string pass over 1711 archive texts found no D or R candidate: no deposit text names AEO Vision, aeovision or aeovision.ai, or the article's title. O-class ran on one class sourced from the field by locus (config): generative engine optimization research lists, pattern 'generative engine optimization' or GEO (case-sensitive), basis the entity's own page (B8: title, ¶2, FAQ 'a GEO list') and the lists beside it on the rail (B4, B5, B2): 215 sentences in 55 deposits. Admission by reading: a sentence is admitted to O when it applies an archive category to GEO as a class, its research or its practice; a bare mention, a title citation, a list of terms, a homonym (GEO as geocoded) or a sentence on SPXI's own identity is not. The hop (H) was run from the fifteen admitted deposits over the citation graph: 216 candidates, read by the string screen and by title, none admitted. The archive's own records of the entity are not deposits and are reached outside the string pass: the Capture Registry's entry (findings and analysis) and the MMRS meta-aggregator record (census.json row aeovision-geo-papers; articles.py), ledgered as CAP-1-NN and MMRS-NN.", "reader": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-10-29", "verdicts": [ { "dep": 510, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the archive's phase model applied to GEO as an industry ('GEO shows Phase 2 tooling emerging as an explicit industry'), one of three cases offered as evidence the model is general", "claims": [ "O510-01" ], "cands": [ "O0059" ] }, { "dep": 655, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the archive's comparison table sets GEO / AEO beside SEO and its own retrieval architecture, GEO's target 'Content extractability' (a category applied to the class); EA-ERR-01 (#1380) corrects the table's third-column phrase, not the GEO column", "claims": [ "O655-01" ], "cands": [ "O0060" ] }, { "dep": 659, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the archive's R2 (capital erasure) applied to GEO agencies: content made more extractable without attribution surviving extraction", "claims": [ "O659-01" ], "cands": [ "O0062", "O0063" ] }, { "dep": 660, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the specification defines GEO by object, permanence and layer (content, ongoing, semantic) against its own entity layer", "claims": [ "O660-01", "O660-02" ], "cands": [ "O0064", "O0065", "O0066", "O0067", "O0068" ] }, { "dep": 661, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: 'What GEO does not do' applies the archive's entity-construction, collision and anchoring categories to GEO; its reading of GEO as 'legitimate and often effective' is carried and marked as narrowed by #1638. Defining paper, read whole", "claims": [ "O661-01", "O661-02", "O661-03" ], "cands": [ "O0069", "O0070", "O0071", "O0072", "O0073", "O0074", "O0075", "O0076", "O0077", "O0078", "O0079", "O0080", "O0081", "O0082", "O0083", "O0084", "O0085", "O0086", "O0087", "O0088", "O0089", "O0090" ] }, { "dep": 61, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: GEO's industry ROI ranges read as 'GEO's economic signature'; admitted with the mark superseded_in_source, the figures withdrawn in #1638 Appendix C. Its set-relation claims bear on SPXI and are not ledgered (their GEO sense is #1638's narrowed relation)", "claims": [ "O61-01" ], "cands": [ "O0001", "O0002", "O0003", "O0004", "O0005", "O0006", "O0007", "O0008", "O0009", "O0010", "O0011", "O0012", "O0013", "O0014", "O0015", "O0016", "O0017", "O0018", "O0019", "O0020", "O0021", "O0022", "O0023", "O0024", "O0025" ] }, { "dep": 670, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the plateau applies the received view's misdescription and deterritorialization to GEO", "claims": [ "O670-01", "O670-02" ], "cands": [ "O0099", "O0100", "O0101", "O0102" ] }, { "dep": 64, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the historiography defines GEO in its own terms (the compositional settlement, R2 compression, provenance stripped, the settlement's authorship accepted) and dates its emergence. Defining paper, read whole", "claims": [ "O64-01", "O64-02", "O64-03" ], "cands": [ "O0035", "O0036", "O0037" ] }, { "dep": 72, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: GEO re-framed as compression engineering", "claims": [ "O72-01" ], "cands": [ "O0038", "O0039", "O0040", "O0041", "O0042", "O0043" ] }, { "dep": 791, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the archive's taxonomic capture and telemetry starvation applied to Google's naming of AEO/GEO", "claims": [ "O791-01" ], "cands": [ "O0117", "O0118", "O0119", "O0120", "O0121", "O0122", "O0123", "O0124", "O0125" ] }, { "dep": 172, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the SEO-to-GEO lineage as the commercial expression of definition capture, and the dated prediction P3 with its falsifier (read from the deposit; the string pass's candidate in it is the claim block O0054, and #1684's index points to the same prediction, O0212)", "claims": [ "O172-01", "O172-02" ], "cands": [ "O0054", "O0212" ] }, { "dep": 1055, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the packet's positive definition of GEO and its reading of GEO as reception-side optimization; its limit (GEO not illegitimate) carried. Defining paper, read whole", "claims": [ "O1055-01", "O1055-02" ], "cands": [ "O0145", "O0146", "O0147", "O0148", "O0149", "O0150", "O0151", "O0152", "O0153", "O0154", "O0155", "O0156", "O0157", "O0158", "O0159" ] }, { "dep": 1638, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: Appendix C keeps GEO as the peer-reviewed literature defines it apart from the commercial practice, traces the industry return range and withdraws it, and restates the 2026 survey's limit. Defining paper (sections 1–4 and Appendix C read; the GEO bearing is Appendix C)", "claims": [ "O1638-01", "O1638-02", "O1638-03" ], "cands": [ "O0194", "O0195" ] }, { "dep": 1643, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: a composition's acceptance of GEO's industry figures without the case studies it required elsewhere, recorded", "claims": [ "O1643-01" ], "cands": [ "O0196" ] }, { "dep": 1686, "strata": [ "O" ], "reason": "O-class: the archive's registry establishes no effect size over GEO (a limit the archive states on its own evidence against the class)", "claims": [ "O1686-01" ], "cands": [ "O0213", "O0214", "O0215" ] } ], "admitted_surface": [ { "dep": "capture-registry", "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/aeo-vision-top-arxiv-papers-geo-aio-20261029/", "reason": "the Capture Registry's findings and analysis for the entity's capture (OBS-b1f1fee164cd, 2026-10-29), the archive's statements on the entity's composition", "claims": [ "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-07" ] }, { "dep": "MMRS", "url": "https://www.machinemediation.org/aggregators/aeovision-geo-papers/", "reason": "the MMRS meta-aggregator record of the entity (2026-10-28, corrected 2026-10-29; editor Lee Sharks): its article (kernel, What it is, Place in the field) and its census fields with their basis", "claims": [ "MMRS-01", "MMRS-02", "MMRS-03", "MMRS-04", "MMRS-05", "MMRS-06", "MMRS-07", "MMRS-08", "MMRS-09", "MMRS-10", "MMRS-11", "MMRS-12", "MMRS-13", "MMRS-14" ] } ], "not_admitted": [ { "dep": [ 63, 976, 1234, 1256 ], "reason": "S4: GEO's object and layer ('content extraction', 'the semantic layer') restated from #660 (2026-04-16), which keeps the earliest date; the sentences add no mechanism, qualification, basis, substrate, falsifier or revision on GEO; their other sentences bear on SPXI and its disambiguation" }, { "dep": [ 657, 1180 ], "reason": "S4: the comparison table of #655 restated (one lineage, #655 earliest)" }, { "dep": [ 106 ], "reason": "S4: 'Where GEO optimizes pages for extraction' restates #660; its other sentence bears on SPXI's operative test" }, { "dep": [ 665, 977, 1353 ], "reason": "the ROI addendum: its GEO sentences assign financial outcomes in compositions and restate SPXI's lift projection; the GEO industry figures are carried at #61 (superseded_in_source by #1638); a claim on SPXI's returns, not on GEO as a class" }, { "dep": [ 1648, 1654, 1681 ], "reason": "three versions of one work (SPXI ≠ AEO); their GEO sentences restate the set relation of #72 for SPXI and point to #655's correction: claims on SPXI and AEO, S4 for GEO" }, { "dep": [ 77, 689 ], "reason": "homonym: GEO here is the archive's 'Geocoded Basin' (EA-GEO-01), geocoded content, not generative engine optimization" }, { "dep": [ 89, 173, 174, 356, 797, 975, 1091, 1238, 1242, 1243, 1367, 1371, 1409 ], "reason": "bare mentions: series anchors, 'Builds on' lines, file manifests and session logs citing 'SPXI ⊇ GEO' or 'SPXI Is Not GEO' by title; no claim on GEO" }, { "dep": [ 161, 164, 166, 167, 790 ], "reason": "bare mentions: citations of Meaning Feudalism at the Guidance Layer (#791) by title; the claim is #791's" }, { "dep": [ 726, 727 ], "reason": "lists of disambiguation and adjacent-field targets naming GEO among terms; no claim on GEO as a class (#726's 'SPXI inscribes entities; GEO optimizes content' restates #660 under S4)" }, { "dep": [ 1088, 1090, 1459 ], "reason": "claims on other objects: SPXI misread as GEO (#1088, #1090), the Capture Registry misdefined through SEO/GEO visibility semantics (#1459)" }, { "dep": [ 1384 ], "reason": "the godkinggoogle map: the candidate sentence describes the composition layer; no claim on GEO" }, { "dep": [ 1684 ], "reason": "the Prediction Index points to #172's and #791's claims (admitted at their sources); S4" }, { "dep": [ 18, 21, 22, 24, 31, 59, 62, 65, 68, 69, 71, 75, 76, 80, 95, 103, 112, 118, 124, 130, 143, 145, 147, 156, 157, 158, 168, 169, 170, 171, 185, 197, 210, 229, 261, 266, 269, 274, 291, 297, 308, 394, 418, 449, 493, 513, 514, 515, 516, 520, 521, 522, 530, 531, 561, 565, 567, 576, 578, 579, 604, 610, 621, 628, 636, 643, 650, 653, 673, 680, 683, 693, 695, 705, 707, 708, 709, 710, 716, 731, 732, 742, 754, 784, 795, 796, 798, 801, 817, 821, 825, 847, 925, 926, 927, 947, 950, 974, 978, 980, 981, 986, 988, 1008, 1010, 1012, 1013, 1024, 1032, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1054, 1083, 1110, 1154, 1155, 1168, 1170, 1171, 1177, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1188, 1200, 1208, 1225, 1239, 1251, 1359, 1361, 1362, 1377, 1386, 1392, 1395, 1423, 1462, 1463, 1469, 1523, 1525, 1526, 1527, 1528, 1529, 1541, 1546, 1549, 1612, 1613, 1614, 1615, 1616, 1630, 1634, 1655, 1657, 1660, 1677, 1687, 1690, 1694, 1714 ], "reason": "hop (forward and reverse from the fifteen admitted deposits): none names AEO Vision, generative engine optimization or GEO (none matched the aliases or the class term in the string pass); screened for answer-engine and visibility-tool terms, the matches (#1655, #1657, the King of AEO mantle and its valuation; #513, #653, #673, #1690) bear on other objects (the AEO contest, SPXI, the archive's specification), not on GEO's research or its lists; no term-absent claim on the class found by title" }, { "dep": [ 63, 89, 106, 161, 173, 174, 665, 726, 790, 797, 975, 976, 977, 1090, 1180, 1234, 1238, 1242, 1243, 1256, 1353, 1367, 1371, 1384, 1409, 1459, 1648, 1654, 1681, 1684 ], "reason": "hop candidates that are also O-class candidates: read in the O pass above" } ], "hop": { "from": [ 61, 64, 72, 172, 510, 655, 659, 660, 661, 670, 791, 1055, 1638, 1643, 1686 ], "candidates": 216, "admitted": 0 }, "class_pass": "O-class: 215 sentences in 55 deposits (summary.json, O_class 215); 15 deposits admitted, 25 claims", "observations": "The archive names neither AEO Vision nor its list in any deposit text. Its bearing on the entity is carried by its own records of it (the MMRS record, the capture) and by its account of the class the list names, GEO, which the archive reads mostly where it distinguishes its own SPXI from it: the GEO claims admitted are those that state what GEO is, what it does to provenance, how its evidence stands and what kind of industry it is.", "counts": { "string_pass": { "D_sentences": 0, "D_deposits": 0, "R_sentences": 0, "R_deposits": 0, "O_direct": 0, "O_class": 215, "O_deposits": 55, "H_candidates": 216 }, "deposits_candidate": 55, "deposits_admitted": 15, "hop_candidates": 216, "hop_admitted": 0, "archive_claims": { "capture": 7, "mmrs": 14, "deposit": 25 } } }