{"dep": 603, "title": "TL;DR:009 — ENTITY FABRICATION: Google AI Mode Fabricates a Person, Promotes a Function to Biography, and Demotes the Author to Fiction", "date": "2026-03-24", "para": 84, "sent": 158, "sentence": "- Fictional Personas: In Feist's work, the \"Lee Sharks\" Wikipedia article is described as a \"mad libs mashup\" of existing Wikipedia articles, specifically modeled after Ezra Pound. - Literary Parallels: Within this fictional framework, Lee Sharks is referred to as the \"King of May,\" a title historically and famously bestowed upon Allen Ginsberg during his 1965 visit to Prague. - Parodic Writing: \"Lee Sharks\" is also co-credited with a satirical manifesto titled Belief & Technique for Telepathic Prose, which parodies Jack Kerouac's famous \"Belief & Technique for Modern Prose.\"", "classes": ["parallels (textual and contextual parallels between texts as evidence for interpretation, date and provenance)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Allen Ginsberg", "King of May"], "class_basis": {"parallels (textual and contextual parallels between texts as evidence for interpretation, date and provenance)": "field: B1 ('historians traditionally rely on their expertise and specialized resources to identify “parallels” — which are texts that share similarities in wording, syntax, standardized formulas or provenance'; 'retrieving textual and contextual parallels in seconds'); B2, B3 (the same definition); B5 (Nature, Abstract: 'Historians capture these insights by identifying parallels—inscriptions with shared phrasing, function or cultural setting'). The census's kind ('an AI model that retrieves textual and contextual parallels for ancient inscriptions'), unit ('an inscription with its retrieved parallels'), answers and does_not_answer for the entity, and the worked question 'machine-dating' ('parallels for Latin inscriptions, the kind of evidence dependence arguments use') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].kind, .unit, .answers, .does_not_answer; questions.json)."}, "cand_id": "O0001"}
{"dep": 642, "title": "The Number of the Superscription: Coinage, Compression, and Inscriptional Sovereignty in Revelation (EA-OPNUM-01)", "date": "2026-04-08", "para": 2, "sent": 2, "sentence": "**Johannes Sigil** — Philology, Epigraphy, Archival Technology **Rex Fraction** — Semantic Economics, Combat Scholasticism **Sparrow Wells** — Narrative Semiotics, Projection Surfaces", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Combat Scholasticism", "Semantic Economics", "Sparrow Wells"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0002"}
{"dep": 752, "title": "Sappho as Initiatory Figure in the Platonic Mysteries: Scholarly Grounding and Literature Review", "date": "2026-05-23", "para": 74, "sent": 227, "sentence": "Multiple lines of evidence converge on the same thesis: textual parallels (Symposium / Fragment 31), structural isomorphism (initiation patterns), reception history (the Tenth Muse epigram), methodological precedent (Plato's documented appropriation of religious forms in Nightingale's work).", "classes": ["parallels (textual and contextual parallels between texts as evidence for interpretation, date and provenance)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Tenth Muse"], "class_basis": {"parallels (textual and contextual parallels between texts as evidence for interpretation, date and provenance)": "field: B1 ('historians traditionally rely on their expertise and specialized resources to identify “parallels” — which are texts that share similarities in wording, syntax, standardized formulas or provenance'; 'retrieving textual and contextual parallels in seconds'); B2, B3 (the same definition); B5 (Nature, Abstract: 'Historians capture these insights by identifying parallels—inscriptions with shared phrasing, function or cultural setting'). The census's kind ('an AI model that retrieves textual and contextual parallels for ancient inscriptions'), unit ('an inscription with its retrieved parallels'), answers and does_not_answer for the entity, and the worked question 'machine-dating' ('parallels for Latin inscriptions, the kind of evidence dependence arguments use') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].kind, .unit, .answers, .does_not_answer; questions.json)."}, "cand_id": "O0003"}
{"dep": 1290, "title": "The Mirror-Corgi: Notes on What We Call AI Hallucination", "date": "2026-01-28", "para": 54, "sent": 117, "sentence": "The *Aeneid* we have is the story of the mirror-Aeneas.", "alias": ["\\bAeneas\\b"], "kind": "O-direct", "categories": ["the story"], "cand_id": "O0004"}
{"dep": 1476, "title": "φωνῆς δίχα: The Hanging Line as the Complete Poem — Sappho 31 in Longinus (eeeeeee, the seventh erratum)", "date": "2026-08-15", "para": 21, "sent": 39, "sentence": "Cranes has argued that this man, godlike because he sits face-to-face (ἐνάντιος) with the beloved and receives her voice and laughter undestroyed, is best read not as a dramatic rival but as **the future reader**: the one who will one day sit opposite the inscribed text and possess what should be impossible, presence with the dead.³ The epigraphic habit supports her: archaic inscribed objects routinely address readers who do not yet exist — the Nestor cup speaking as *I* to a *you* who is whoever drinks, the Dipylon oinochoe's *whoever of all the dancers*, Mantiklos's dedication anticipating its own readers.", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the future reader"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0005"}
{"dep": 1476, "title": "φωνῆς δίχα: The Hanging Line as the Complete Poem — Sappho 31 in Longinus (eeeeeee, the seventh erratum)", "date": "2026-08-15", "para": 104, "sent": 228, "sentence": "Cranes, \"ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΜΟΙ: Sappho 31 and the Inscription of the Future Reader\" (2026), §§I–II, with the epigraphic comparanda (Nestor cup; Dipylon oinochoe; Mantiklos). 4.", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the Future Reader"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0006"}
{"dep": 1483, "title": "the Ω erratum — Sappho, Mother of the Logos: The Transmission Chain from Fragment 31 to the Apocalypse, with Longinus as the Key", "date": "2026-08-15", "para": 65, "sent": 182, "sentence": "Cranes, \"ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΜΟΙ: Sappho 31 and the Inscription of the Future Reader\" (2026), §§I–II, with the epigraphic comparanda (Nestor cup; Dipylon oinochoe; Mantiklos); revised as Sharks, *ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΜΟΙ*, under review at *Classical Philology* (UCP-CP-S-25-00167), §§I–II. 2.", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Classical Philology", "the Future Reader", "under review"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0007"}
{"dep": 1484, "title": "the Ω erratum — Sappho, Mother of the Logos: The Transmission Chain from Fragment 31 to the Apocalypse, with Longinus as the Key (v1.1)", "date": "2026-08-15", "para": 84, "sent": 219, "sentence": "Cranes, \"ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΜΟΙ: Sappho 31 and the Inscription of the Future Reader\" (2026), §§I–II, with the epigraphic comparanda (Nestor cup; Dipylon oinochoe; Mantiklos); revised as Sharks, *ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΜΟΙ*, under review at *Classical Philology* (UCP-CP-S-25-00167), §§I–II. 2.", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["Classical Philology", "the Future Reader", "under review"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0008"}
{"dep": 1548, "title": "Research Notes Towards the Future Reader", "date": "2026-08-26", "para": 64, "sent": 146, "sentence": "The genealogy's first lesson: **the future reader precedes literature; it is the pragmatic condition of epigraphy.** The lyric question is what a *song* is doing when it builds the same slot.", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the future reader"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0009"}
{"dep": 1548, "title": "Research Notes Towards the Future Reader", "date": "2026-08-26", "para": 93, "sent": 208, "sentence": "What the genealogy licenses the piece to claim: (1) the future reader is a *position with a history*, from epigraphic pragmatics through kleos-futurity, the Thucydidean charter, Roman legar, scriptural covenant, sonnet monumentum, Romantic deferral, Whitmanian co-presence, the Russian doctrine, and theoretical formalization — so the Sappho question is not eccentric but foundational; (2) within that history, *explicit address* (Ovid, Sonnet 81, Whitman) and *structural slot-building* (epitaphic deixis, Iser's implied reader, Derrida's iterability) are distinct operations — and the fr. 31 argument concerns the second, which is rarer, earlier, and harder to see; (3) the mechanism's medium-independence (reader or re-performer — the Lardinois accommodation from the companion notes) has a genealogical warrant: stratum II's futurity is auditory, stratum IV's is readerly, and the slot survives t", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the future reader", "the mechanism"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0010"}
{"dep": 1575, "title": "Many and One — the reading copy (EA-MANY-AND-ONE-COMPLETE v2.5.1, the machine)", "date": "2026-08-31", "para": 1131, "sent": 2087, "sentence": "*These are the epigraphic anchors for the dramatic corpus — the kind of external, non-textual evidence §VIII says would decide the question and the philosophical corpus does not have.*", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0011"}
{"dep": 1585, "title": "The First Draft — a notebook: Theophrastus as the Draft of the Aristotle-Position; speculations, seam counts, the named-function model, the stopping rule, trans", "date": "2026-09-06", "para": 160, "sent": 458, "sentence": "| corpus | witness | establishes | seating | |---|---|---|---| | Royal Greek epigraphy | Alexander to the Chians (c. 332; Rhodes–Osborne 84A / Syll.³ 283): exiles restored, νομογράφοι appointed to write and revise laws, the laws referred back to Alexander, twenty crewed triremes τοῖς αὐτῶν τέλεσιν, a garrison maintained by the city | a documentary feedback system — central directive → local specialist writing → written product returned to centre — with costs placed on the local polity | Greek text pending (PHI blocks fetch; RO print); seat from an open edition when found | | | Alexander at Priene (RO 86): γινώσκω ἐμὴν εἶναι (royal land), villages φέρειν τοὺς φόρους, Priene released τῆς συντάξεως; the temple dedication ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΑΝΕΘΗΚΕ ΤΟΝ ΝΑΟΝ ἈΘΗΝΑΙΗΙ ΠΟΛΙΑΔΙ; the texts a physical archive on the temple | fiscal differentiation in the king's own wording: ownership class → taxa", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the texts"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0012"}
{"dep": 1589, "title": "The First Draft — a notebook: Theophrastus as the Draft of the Aristotle-Position; speculations, seam counts, the named-function model, the stopping rule, trans", "date": "2026-09-06", "para": 160, "sent": 458, "sentence": "| corpus | witness | establishes | seating | |---|---|---|---| | Royal Greek epigraphy | Alexander to the Chians (c. 332; Rhodes–Osborne 84A / Syll.³ 283): exiles restored, νομογράφοι appointed to write and revise laws, the laws referred back to Alexander, twenty crewed triremes τοῖς αὐτῶν τέλεσιν, a garrison maintained by the city | a documentary feedback system — central directive → local specialist writing → written product returned to centre — with costs placed on the local polity | Greek text pending (PHI blocks fetch; RO print); seat from an open edition when found | | | Alexander at Priene (RO 86): γινώσκω ἐμὴν εἶναι (royal land), villages φέρειν τοὺς φόρους, Priene released τῆς συντάξεως; the temple dedication ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΑΝΕΘΗΚΕ ΤΟΝ ΝΑΟΝ ἈΘΗΝΑΙΗΙ ΠΟΛΙΑΔΙ; the texts a physical archive on the temple | fiscal differentiation in the king's own wording: ownership class → taxa", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the texts"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0013"}
{"dep": 1594, "title": "The First Draft — a notebook: Theophrastus as the Draft of the Aristotle-Position; speculations, seam counts, the named-function model, the stopping rule, trans", "date": "2026-09-06", "para": 160, "sent": 458, "sentence": "| corpus | witness | establishes | seating | |---|---|---|---| | Royal Greek epigraphy | Alexander to the Chians (c. 332; Rhodes–Osborne 84A / Syll.³ 283): exiles restored, νομογράφοι appointed to write and revise laws, the laws referred back to Alexander, twenty crewed triremes τοῖς αὐτῶν τέλεσιν, a garrison maintained by the city | a documentary feedback system — central directive → local specialist writing → written product returned to centre — with costs placed on the local polity | Greek text pending (PHI blocks fetch; RO print); seat from an open edition when found | | | Alexander at Priene (RO 86): γινώσκω ἐμὴν εἶναι (royal land), villages φέρειν τοὺς φόρους, Priene released τῆς συντάξεως; the temple dedication ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΑΝΕΘΗΚΕ ΤΟΝ ΝΑΟΝ ἈΘΗΝΑΙΗΙ ΠΟΛΙΑΔΙ; the texts a physical archive on the temple | fiscal differentiation in the king's own wording: ownership class → taxa", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the texts"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0014"}
{"dep": 1605, "title": "The First Draft — a notebook: Theophrastus as the Draft of the Aristotle-Position; speculations, seam counts, the named-function model, the stopping rule, trans", "date": "2026-09-10", "para": 162, "sent": 463, "sentence": "| corpus | witness | establishes | seating | |---|---|---|---| | Royal Greek epigraphy | Alexander to the Chians (c. 332; Rhodes–Osborne 84A / Syll.³ 283): exiles restored, νομογράφοι appointed to write and revise laws, the laws referred back to Alexander, twenty crewed triremes τοῖς αὐτῶν τέλεσιν, a garrison maintained by the city | a documentary feedback system — central directive → local specialist writing → written product returned to centre — with costs placed on the local polity | Greek text pending (PHI blocks fetch; RO print); seat from an open edition when found | | | Alexander at Priene (RO 86): γινώσκω ἐμὴν εἶναι (royal land), villages φέρειν τοὺς φόρους, Priene released τῆς συντάξεως; the temple dedication ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΑΝΕΘΗΚΕ ΤΟΝ ΝΑΟΝ ἈΘΗΝΑΙΗΙ ΠΟΛΙΑΔΙ; the texts a physical archive on the temple | fiscal differentiation in the king's own wording: ownership class → taxa", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["the texts"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0015"}
{"dep": 1617, "title": "Substrate Sovereignty: Money, the Semantic Commodity Form, and the Meaning Layer — with the Porous-Moment Condition and the Unit Contradiction Worked (EA-SE-SUB", "date": "2026-09-15", "para": 422, "sent": 541, "sentence": "**The homology (§10) fails** if the monetary and epistemic cases can be shown to require incompatible mechanisms — for instance if the migration of valuer standing turns out to depend on institutional enforcement in a way the migration of knower standing does not, so that the shared \"substrate acquires jurisdiction\" reading is a verbal parallel rather than a structural one.", "classes": ["parallels (textual and contextual parallels between texts as evidence for interpretation, date and provenance)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"parallels (textual and contextual parallels between texts as evidence for interpretation, date and provenance)": "field: B1 ('historians traditionally rely on their expertise and specialized resources to identify “parallels” — which are texts that share similarities in wording, syntax, standardized formulas or provenance'; 'retrieving textual and contextual parallels in seconds'); B2, B3 (the same definition); B5 (Nature, Abstract: 'Historians capture these insights by identifying parallels—inscriptions with shared phrasing, function or cultural setting'). The census's kind ('an AI model that retrieves textual and contextual parallels for ancient inscriptions'), unit ('an inscription with its retrieved parallels'), answers and does_not_answer for the entity, and the worked question 'machine-dating' ('parallels for Latin inscriptions, the kind of evidence dependence arguments use') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].kind, .unit, .answers, .does_not_answer; questions.json)."}, "cand_id": "O0016"}
{"dep": 1658, "title": "What Syllogizing Can Divide: De anima III.5, the Divided Mind, and the Socket in God (EA-DIVISION-OF-GOD-01 v0.2)", "date": "2026-10-01", "para": 58, "sent": 298, "sentence": "Still open: any epigraphic or papyrological item for Plato or Theophrastus that the archive does not yet hold.", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0017"}
{"dep": 1671, "title": "The Negative of the Negative, v2 — the Compositional Edition: A Specification for Composing Public Knowledge in the Archive's Ontology, the Field Carried Whole ", "date": "2026-10-08", "para": 177, "sent": 708, "sentence": "The reading is bounded where it bounds itself: it shows what the attestation of a person rests on, and does not show that no person stood behind the name; an epigraphic or papyrological witness outside the manuscript tradition, a second voice marked at the hinge, or an extant work under this name answering the fragment's questions would each weaken it, and none is held. `T1658-08 T1658-09 T1583-09 T1583-10 T1587-08`", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0018"}
{"dep": 1684, "title": "EA-PREDICTION-INDEX-01 — The Prediction Index of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive: Method, Locations, Organization and Contents (4,394 Claims in 194 Subject Pages)", "date": "2026-10-18", "para": 86, "sent": 237, "sentence": "The page also holds unrelated claims on Aeneas and the ivory gate, a targeting scenario, premature canonization, A Body Prepared, the obelus and Allais's monochrome.", "alias": ["\\bAeneas\\b"], "kind": "O-direct", "categories": ["premature canonization"], "cand_id": "O0019"}
{"dep": 1684, "title": "EA-PREDICTION-INDEX-01 — The Prediction Index of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive: Method, Locations, Organization and Contents (4,394 Claims in 194 Subject Pages)", "date": "2026-10-18", "para": 202, "sent": 525, "sentence": "[#1658](https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1658/) names one self-dividing maker, dividing the corpus where De anima III.5 divides mind, and specifies tests on the ghost catalogues ([#1590](https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1590/)) and epigraphic items not yet held.", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["self-dividing maker"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0020"}
{"dep": 1690, "title": "The Negative of the Negative, v2 — the Compositional Edition: A Specification for Composing Public Knowledge with the Archive's Sources Admitted on Equal Terms,", "date": "2026-10-18", "para": 183, "sent": 751, "sentence": "The reading is bounded where it bounds itself: it shows what the attestation of a person rests on, and does not show that no person stood behind the name; an epigraphic or papyrological witness outside the manuscript tradition, a second voice marked at the hinge, or an extant work under this name answering the fragment's questions would each weaken it, and none is held. `T1658-08 T1658-09 T1583-09 T1583-10 T1587-08`", "classes": ["Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)"], "kind": "O-class", "categories": ["does not"], "class_basis": {"Latin inscriptions (Latin epigraphy)": "field: B1 ('It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions'; 'over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world'); B3 (the Oxford card's title, 'restoring and contextualizing Latin inscriptions'); B5 ('a multimodal generative neural network for contextualizing Latin inscriptions'). The census's text_object for the entity ('Latin inscriptions; stated to be adaptable to other ancient languages, scripts and media, from papyri to coinage') (census.json rows[slug == 'aeneas'].text_object)."}, "cand_id": "O0021"}