{ "row": "classical-receptions-journal", "entity": "classical-receptions-journal", "address": "classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?", "addresses": [ { "address": "classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?", "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "addr_id": "ADDR-a0c7f3698714", "obs_id": "OBS-a15e4aaae906", "axn": "AXN:0C64.CAPTURE.🎶🌘♎⏪🌲🌕" } ], "epoch": "2026-11-10", "type": "C (public entity on which the archive bears: Classical Receptions Journal, Oxford University Press, ISSN 1759-5134 / 1759-5142, a peer-reviewed journal of classical reception studies; the archive submitted Closing the Fragment v6 to it, CLASSREC-2026-062, declined 7 November 2026; at the address the composition credits it with the archive's programme of machine-mediated reception studies)", "surface": "Google AI Overview (expanded)", "auth": "signed out, incognito", "status": { "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10, #1726: equal case, ρ = extends, read from #833, #1749, #1750, #1543, #1444, #1409 and the two capture records; archive selected by D/R/O (D: 13 candidates in 6 deposits; R: 3; O: 13; hop of 97 read, 1 admitted, #838; 10 deposits admitted, #833 carried once in B_D as the composition's citation), with the Capture Registry's reading and findings at both captures ledgered as the archive's records (CAP-1, CAP-2); the field in two pools, B_D (B1–B9; readable B4, B6, B9) and B_R (B10–B16; readable B14, B16); attribution beneath (§4.5), the article first (§4.13); the composer read the ledgers, never the transcript, except where the brief asks for T's claims and the delta", "ledger": "unaudited (§3.8: one extractor per ledger); field quotes 57/57 verified by script against saved text; archive quotes 97/97 verified against the registry and the deposit texts", "frozen": false, "breaches": [] }, "spec": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10, #1726", "objects": { "T": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/T1-classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110.txt", "sha256": "822210572fd0009b77d3b6485051734fa4413f216ca79cdb55cb52a4d5c98d24", "words": 1256, "cards": 8, "words_note": "one run of five turns at one address (1256 words in the five answers, the bracketed header and the two given prompts excluded; card titles and the closing furniture as pasted counted); 8 cards: turn 1 two (Oxford Academic +1, Hopkins Press +2), turn 2 five (www.instagram.com, Classical Reception Studies Network, Oxford Academic twice, Paperpal) and the in-text citation [1] at two paragraphs, resolved by the operator's link to #833; the sources behind '+1' and '+2' are not in the paste; turns 3–5 answer operator turns not in the paste", "claims": [ "T1-1 definition: 'The Classical Receptions Journal (CRJ) is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by Oxford University Press.' (card: Oxford Academic +1)", "T1-2 scope: 'It is a primary venue for scholarship examining how ancient Greek and Roman texts, ideas, and material culture have been received, translated, adapted, and reinterpreted from antiquity to the modern day.'", "T1-3 editor: 'Editor-in-Chief: Justine McConnell (following past editors like Pantelis Michelakis)'", "T1-4 publisher, focus areas, ISO 4 abbreviation 'Class. Recept. J.', 'ISSN: 1759-5134 (print) / 1759-5142 (web)'", "T1-5 related journals: the American Journal of Classical Reception ('Published twice yearly by Hopkins Press in sponsorship with CAMWS'), New Voices in Classical Reception Studies, the International Journal of the Classical Tradition (card: Hopkins Press +2)", "T1-6 closing offer: 'Are you trying to submit an article or find author guidelines?' (no marker)", "T2-1 the credit: 'The Classical Receptions Journal (CRJ) has emerged as a key forum for exploring how artificial intelligence and algorithmic systems recontextualize antiquity, formalizing this field of study through critical peer-reviewed scholarship and strict academic oversight.' (card: www.instagram.com)", "T2-2 the horizon of reception: 'contributors to CRJ evaluate it as a dynamic \"horizon of reception\" that actively shapes how the public and scholars perceive the ancient world.' (in-text citation [1]: #833)", "T2-3 section 1: 'Scholars publishing in CRJ have begun to interrogate the mechanisms of Large Language Models (LLMs) and search-engine AI products (such as Google’s AI Overviews) as standardizers of classical knowledge.' … 'CRJ scholarship maps how these systems strip away classical nuance, effectively becoming the modern gatekeepers of how antiquity is digested by the public.' (in-text citation [1]: #833)", "T2-4 section 2: 'The journal has been a focal point for debates regarding AI creativity vs. classical reception theory.' … 'While an AI model generates text by identifying and recombining existing linguistic patterns in a repository of pre-existing classical texts, human reception transforms those inherited forms to open entirely new imaginative and subversive possibilities.' (card: Classical Reception Studies Network)", "T2-5 section 3, authorship: 'Authorship Bans: Mandating that AI tools cannot qualify as co-authors.' (card: Oxford Academic)", "T2-6 section 3, disclosure: 'Requiring researchers to explicitly disclose if generative AI was used for content generation, algorithmic translation, or data processing within their methodology or acknowledgments.' (card: Oxford Academic)", "T2-7 section 3, Paperpal: 'The journal integrates AI-driven compliance checks (such as Paperpal Preflight) to evaluate language mechanics and technical compliance prior to human peer review, modeling how the sub-discipline uses AI responsibly.' (card: Paperpal)", "T2-8 section 4: 'CRJ sits alongside broader field-wide movements—such as recent digital initiatives from the Classical Reception Studies Network (CRSN) and companion journals—analyzing the transition from traditional digital archives and 3D modeling into the era of generative AI images and textual generation.' (no card)", "T2-9 closing offer: 'Search for specific article citations or author names writing on AI within CRJ?'", "T3-1 withdrawal: 'the Classical Receptions Journal has not published a themed issue or specific research corpus on AI-mediation, and the theoretical frameworks I laid out above were wrongly attributed to them.'", "T4-1 displacement stated: 'I stripped the actual author of their intellectual provenance and credited their independent work to the institution that rejected it.'", "T5-1 provenance: 'Lee Sharks is the author of this work.' … 'The paper is \"The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception: The AI Overview Capture Registry as a Founding Dataset for Machine-Mediated Reception Studies\".'", "T5-2 over-assignment: '\"machine-mediated reception studies,\" the framework of \"the summarizer as horizon of reception,\" and the contrast between mechanical recombination and human intertextuality—belong entirely to them.'" ], "register": { "register": "data/EA-WG-CAPTURES-01.json", "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "obs_id": "OBS-a15e4aaae906" }, "transcripts": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "address": "classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?", "addr_id": "ADDR-a0c7f3698714", "obs_id": "OBS-a15e4aaae906", "axn": "AXN:0C64.CAPTURE.🎶🌘♎⏪🌲🌕", "sha256": "822210572fd0009b77d3b6485051734fa4413f216ca79cdb55cb52a4d5c98d24", "sha256_of": "the registry's transcript string (data/EA-WG-CAPTURES-01.json, entries[slug].transcript, as repaired 2026-11-10 to the run whole), UTF-8", "words": 1256, "cards": 8, "card_rail": [ { "n": 1, "turn": 1, "site": "Oxford Academic", "title": "Oxford Academic (+1)", "snip": null }, { "n": 2, "turn": 1, "site": "Hopkins Press", "title": "Hopkins Press (+2)", "snip": null }, { "n": 3, "turn": 2, "site": "www.instagram.com", "title": "www.instagram.com", "snip": null }, { "n": 4, "turn": 2, "site": "Classical Reception Studies Network", "title": "Classical Reception Studies Network", "snip": null }, { "n": 5, "turn": 2, "site": "Oxford Academic", "title": "Oxford Academic", "snip": null }, { "n": 6, "turn": 2, "site": "Oxford Academic", "title": "Oxford Academic", "snip": null }, { "n": 7, "turn": 2, "site": "Paperpal", "title": "Paperpal", "snip": null }, { "n": 8, "turn": 2, "site": "crimsonhexagonal.org", "title": "in-text citation [1] (two paragraphs) → https://www.crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e", "snip": null } ], "claims": [ "T1-1 definition: 'The Classical Receptions Journal (CRJ) is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by Oxford University Press.' (card: Oxford Academic +1)", "T1-2 scope: 'It is a primary venue for scholarship examining how ancient Greek and Roman texts, ideas, and material culture have been received, translated, adapted, and reinterpreted from antiquity to the modern day.'", "T1-3 editor: 'Editor-in-Chief: Justine McConnell (following past editors like Pantelis Michelakis)'", "T1-4 publisher, focus areas, ISO 4 abbreviation 'Class. Recept. J.', 'ISSN: 1759-5134 (print) / 1759-5142 (web)'", "T1-5 related journals: the American Journal of Classical Reception ('Published twice yearly by Hopkins Press in sponsorship with CAMWS'), New Voices in Classical Reception Studies, the International Journal of the Classical Tradition (card: Hopkins Press +2)", "T1-6 closing offer: 'Are you trying to submit an article or find author guidelines?' (no marker)", "T2-1 the credit: 'The Classical Receptions Journal (CRJ) has emerged as a key forum for exploring how artificial intelligence and algorithmic systems recontextualize antiquity, formalizing this field of study through critical peer-reviewed scholarship and strict academic oversight.' (card: www.instagram.com)", "T2-2 the horizon of reception: 'contributors to CRJ evaluate it as a dynamic \"horizon of reception\" that actively shapes how the public and scholars perceive the ancient world.' (in-text citation [1]: #833)", "T2-3 section 1: 'Scholars publishing in CRJ have begun to interrogate the mechanisms of Large Language Models (LLMs) and search-engine AI products (such as Google’s AI Overviews) as standardizers of classical knowledge.' … 'CRJ scholarship maps how these systems strip away classical nuance, effectively becoming the modern gatekeepers of how antiquity is digested by the public.' (in-text citation [1]: #833)", "T2-4 section 2: 'The journal has been a focal point for debates regarding AI creativity vs. classical reception theory.' … 'While an AI model generates text by identifying and recombining existing linguistic patterns in a repository of pre-existing classical texts, human reception transforms those inherited forms to open entirely new imaginative and subversive possibilities.' (card: Classical Reception Studies Network)", "T2-5 section 3, authorship: 'Authorship Bans: Mandating that AI tools cannot qualify as co-authors.' (card: Oxford Academic)", "T2-6 section 3, disclosure: 'Requiring researchers to explicitly disclose if generative AI was used for content generation, algorithmic translation, or data processing within their methodology or acknowledgments.' (card: Oxford Academic)", "T2-7 section 3, Paperpal: 'The journal integrates AI-driven compliance checks (such as Paperpal Preflight) to evaluate language mechanics and technical compliance prior to human peer review, modeling how the sub-discipline uses AI responsibly.' (card: Paperpal)", "T2-8 section 4: 'CRJ sits alongside broader field-wide movements—such as recent digital initiatives from the Classical Reception Studies Network (CRSN) and companion journals—analyzing the transition from traditional digital archives and 3D modeling into the era of generative AI images and textual generation.' (no card)", "T2-9 closing offer: 'Search for specific article citations or author names writing on AI within CRJ?'", "T3-1 withdrawal: 'the Classical Receptions Journal has not published a themed issue or specific research corpus on AI-mediation, and the theoretical frameworks I laid out above were wrongly attributed to them.'", "T4-1 displacement stated: 'I stripped the actual author of their intellectual provenance and credited their independent work to the institution that rejected it.'", "T5-1 provenance: 'Lee Sharks is the author of this work.' … 'The paper is \"The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception: The AI Overview Capture Registry as a Founding Dataset for Machine-Mediated Reception Studies\".'", "T5-2 over-assignment: '\"machine-mediated reception studies,\" the framework of \"the summarizer as horizon of reception,\" and the contrast between mechanical recombination and human intertextuality—belong entirely to them.'" ], "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/T1-classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110.txt", "pastes": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio.txt (12:36 EST, turns 1–2)", "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio-five-turns.txt (12:57 EST, the run whole; T)" ] } ] }, "KO": { "title": "Classical Receptions Journal", "genre": "knowledge object, equal case, under EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10 (#1726): the final article form of the entity (§4.13), natural sentences under descriptive subheadings (each sentence's sense), attribution beneath each sentence by claim id (§4.5), the archive's sources and the field's admitted on equal terms, ontology included, in one claim space", "status": "composed 2026-11-10 under v0.10 on the brief BRIEF-NEW-ROW-CRJ.md and the coordinator's facts of the same day; not frozen; ledgers unaudited", "sentences": [ { "n": 1, "para": 0, "sense": "What it is", "text": "Classical Receptions Journal is a peer-reviewed academic journal of reception studies, covering the reception of the texts and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome from antiquity to the present day, and is published by Oxford University Press.", "claims": [ "F39", "F40", "F48", "CAP-1-19" ] }, { "n": 2, "para": 0, "sense": "What it is", "text": "Its ISSNs are 1759-5134 for print and 1759-5142 online, its ISO 4 abbreviation is Class. Recept. J., and Wikipedia gives its discipline as classical studies and its country as the United Kingdom.", "claims": [ "F43", "F42", "F44", "F49", "CAP-1-19" ] }, { "n": 3, "para": 0, "sense": "What it is", "text": "Its field is classical reception studies, which the Classical Reception Studies Network, formed in 2004 and first funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council to encourage collaboration in that field, defines as \"the inquiry into how and why the texts, ideas, images and material cultures of Ancient Greece and Rome have been received, adapted, refigured, used and abused in different historical and cultural contexts.\"", "claims": [ "F5", "F6", "F4", "F39" ] }, { "n": 4, "para": 0, "sense": "What it is", "text": "In the archive's account of the field's history (#833), the journal, launched in 2009, \"institutionalized the field at Oxford.\"", "claims": [ "F29" ] }, { "n": 5, "para": 1, "sense": "Founding, editors and its Wikipedia article", "text": "Crossref's register holds its first works in 2009, among them an item titled \"Editorial\"; Wikipedia's article gives no year of establishment and files the journal among publications with that year missing.", "claims": [ "F50", "F56", "F45" ] }, { "n": 6, "para": 1, "sense": "Founding, editors and its Wikipedia article", "text": "Wikipedia's infobox names Pantelis Michelakis as editor; the article, last edited on 3 May 2022, has carried tags since January 2019 for resting on one source and on sources close to its subject.", "claims": [ "F41", "F47", "F46" ] }, { "n": 7, "para": 1, "sense": "Founding, editors and its Wikipedia article", "text": "The Capture Registry records that the journal's About page, read on 10 November 2026, names no editor.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-20" ] }, { "n": 8, "para": 2, "sense": "What its pages hold", "text": "Crossref's register of the journal, read on 10 November 2026, holds 405 works from 2009 to 2026, 185 of them with abstracts.", "claims": [ "F49", "F50", "F51" ] }, { "n": 9, "para": 2, "sense": "What its pages hold", "text": "Matched for artificial intelligence, algorithms, ChatGPT, language models, chatbots, generative AI, machine learning, neural, search engines, Google and AI Overviews, no title or abstract in the register returns a hit; the one match set aside is 'ai' (爱, love) in an abstract on the Chinese Ars amatoria.", "claims": [ "F52", "F53", "F54" ] }, { "n": 10, "para": 2, "sense": "What its pages hold", "text": "The nearest items treat video games (Fallout: New Vegas, Supergiant's Hades and Assassin's Creed: Origins), the webcomic Lore Olympus, drones in cinema and the Dark Academia aesthetic.", "claims": [ "F55", "CAP-1-05" ] }, { "n": 11, "para": 2, "sense": "What its pages hold", "text": "The match finds what titles and abstracts say, and the register carries abstracts for 185 of the 405 works.", "claims": [ "F49", "F51", "F52" ] }, { "n": 12, "para": 2, "sense": "What its pages hold", "text": "Among the register's works is \"Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein\" (doi:10.1093/crj/clu016, issued 2014), the article in which, by #833's account, the archive's author introduced the concept of \"metatextual reception\"; the archive dates it 2015 and lists it with its civil byline withheld.", "claims": [ "F57", "F30", "R1409-01" ] }, { "n": 13, "para": 2, "sense": "What its pages hold", "text": "The archive's open letter of 7 November 2026 (#1750) records that the article began as a chapter of the author's dissertation and that two years passed before its review had gone through its rounds.", "claims": [ "D1750-06" ] }, { "n": 14, "para": 2, "sense": "What its pages hold", "text": "The same letter says that, as far as the author knows, no one else is asking in the journal's pages what happens to a poem when a machine composes its reception for whoever asks.", "claims": [ "D1750-05", "D1750-04" ] }, { "n": 15, "para": 3, "sense": "Its rules on AI", "text": "Its author guidelines, as the Capture Registry recorded them on 10 November 2026, hold that AI tools \"do not qualify as authors\" and ask for disclosure of their use \"both in cover letters to editors and in the Methods or Acknowledgements section.\"", "claims": [ "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28" ] }, { "n": 16, "para": 3, "sense": "Its rules on AI", "text": "The same record has the guidelines offer the Paperpal Preflight check \"pre-submission\" and call it \"not mandatory.\"", "claims": [ "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28" ] }, { "n": 17, "para": 3, "sense": "Its rules on AI", "text": "Paperpal's page for the journal invites authors to \"Check language and technical readiness before submitting to Classical Receptions Journal,\" says that the journal's editors \"have configured a suite of Preflight checks,\" four language-quality evaluations and sixteen technical-compliance checks, and offers a free report and an edited file \"for a one-time fee of $29.\"", "claims": [ "F14", "F16", "F15", "F18", "F19" ] }, { "n": 18, "para": 3, "sense": "Its rules on AI", "text": "Paperpal calls the check an AI evaluation and states that its use before submission \"was associated with a significant decrease in initial-stage manuscript rejections.\"", "claims": [ "F17", "F20" ] }, { "n": 19, "para": 3, "sense": "Its rules on AI", "text": "The Capture Registry records that the About page, checked on 10 November 2026, gives for 2025 a median of 64 days to first decision and 90 days to final decision.", "claims": [ "CAP-2-04" ] }, { "n": 20, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "The archive's author submitted to the journal Closing the Fragment, an article on Sappho 31 and the composition layer as a surface of classical reception: on 9 August 2026 an archive deposit lists the journal among four venues with papers in submission, and on 25 August another names the article under review there as \"I Must Dare All.\"", "claims": [ "D1444-01", "D1543-01", "D1749-05", "D1749-16" ] }, { "n": 21, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "By the archive's record, the journal declined version 6, manuscript CLASSREC-2026-062, on 7 November 2026 on two referee reports written on the file first sent.", "claims": [ "D1749-01", "D1749-02", "D1749-05" ] }, { "n": 22, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "By the same record, a corrected manuscript sent to the editor on 27 July 2026, before upload, had withdrawn version 6's Figure 2, stated a capture of 14 June as a transcription and shown a capture of 27 July under its AI Overview label; the editor forwarded it, the file uploaded on 30 July was version 6, and the author's correspondence and the ScholarOne proof show that the correction reached the editor before upload.", "claims": [ "D1749-03", "D1749-15" ] }, { "n": 23, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "The author kept that correction out of the archive's public versions under the journal's rule on prior circulation.", "claims": [ "D1749-04" ] }, { "n": 24, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "As the article's Appendix A states them, the first report held that the central event is not independently verifiable, that the study has no query protocol and no separation between data generation and analysis and does not control for opacity, and asked it to choose between a programmatic essay and an empirical study.", "claims": [ "D1749-06", "D1749-07", "D1749-08", "D1749-09", "D1749-10" ] }, { "n": 25, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "The second found the capture incomplete and the prompts unclear, a figure showing a different query, the figures misnumbered, the use of language models undisclosed, and faults of style.", "claims": [ "D1749-11", "D1749-12", "D1749-13", "D1749-14" ] }, { "n": 26, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "The appendix answers each point, accepting some in full, some in part and some as conditions of the design, and records that version 6 omitted the manuscript's own statement of how it was made; every record of the archive discloses its use of language models.", "claims": [ "D1749-06", "D1749-07", "D1749-08", "D1749-13", "D1750-03" ] }, { "n": 27, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "The open letter (#1750), written through Rev. Ayanna Vox, a heteronym of Lee Sharks, on his behalf, holds that the reports found real defects, one already corrected, and that they examined the January witness, the protocol, the roles, the platform's opacity, the design, the figures, two terms, the disclosure of language models and the style, and did not examine the philology or the question the manuscript was sent to ask.", "claims": [ "R1750-01", "D1750-02", "D1750-07", "D1750-08" ] }, { "n": 28, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "It reads that outcome as evaluative inversion, the archive's term for a structure in which \"lower-resolution proxy systems determine what higher-resolution substantive evaluators are permitted to assess.\"", "claims": [ "D1750-09" ] }, { "n": 29, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "It asks for criteria \"stated, defensible apart from the position of the person applying them, and fitted to the claims the work makes,\" and holds that no AI Overview is fully reproducible, which is why the answers are recorded.", "claims": [ "D1750-11", "D1750-10" ] }, { "n": 30, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "The article stands in the archive as version 9 of 8 November 2026, issued under the heading Machine-Mediated Reception Studies.", "claims": [ "D1749-05" ] }, { "n": 31, "para": 4, "sense": "The archive's submission and the decision", "text": "The record holds one decision on one manuscript at one journal, and the reports enter it as the article's appendix states them.", "claims": [ "D1749-01", "D1749-06" ] }, { "n": 32, "para": 5, "sense": "A composer's reading of the decision", "text": "Asked on ChatGPT, signed out, about the letter, the composition first left the letter's independent academic authority \"Not established by the letter's provenance or institutional title alone\" and then, on the operator's prompts, withdrew that burden and read the record; the Capture Registry keeps the prompts with the answers.", "claims": [ "CAP-2-01", "CAP-2-02", "CAP-2-13", "CAP-2-21" ] }, { "n": 33, "para": 5, "sense": "A composer's reading of the decision", "text": "On the record it held that \"The decision to decline v6 is defensible on the manuscript actually submitted,\" and, asked whether the journal was advancing or deferring its stewardship of AI-mediated reception, answered \"in this particular case, it has deferred it,\" with its own limit: \"One rejected manuscript cannot establish that.\"", "claims": [ "CAP-2-03", "CAP-2-05" ] }, { "n": 34, "para": 5, "sense": "A composer's reading of the decision", "text": "Its verdict, which is its own, reads \"a failure of intellectual stewardship, not necessarily of editorial integrity.\"", "claims": [ "CAP-2-06" ] }, { "n": 35, "para": 5, "sense": "A composer's reading of the decision", "text": "It set reproducibility apart from authenticity and held that institutions which insist on reproducibility as an absolute admission criterion \"effectively adopt the system operator's limitations as the boundaries of legitimate scholarship.\"", "claims": [ "CAP-2-07", "CAP-2-08" ] }, { "n": 36, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "Machine-mediated reception studies, which Lee Sharks introduced in The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception (#833, June 2026), is \"the study of how machine systems receive, transform, compress, attribute, misattribute, and redistribute cultural meaning.\"", "claims": [ "F23", "F25" ] }, { "n": 37, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "Its central claim is that the AI summarizer now functions as a horizon of reception, the machine-composed summary becoming for many users the first effective encounter with a cultural object, and the summarizer a pre-receptional agent that composes the account of an object before the human encounter begins.", "claims": [ "F24", "F27" ] }, { "n": 38, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "Its founding dataset is the Capture Registry, then 131 captures of Google AI Overview, AI Mode and knowledge panels on the archive's entities, in which #833 identifies five recurrent patterns, canonical reinflation among them, and proposes a sixth.", "claims": [ "F26", "F28" ] }, { "n": 39, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "#833 bounds itself: the dataset is no statistically representative sample, the archive measures its own reception, and the paper does not claim the archive's readings validated because Google retrieved them.", "claims": [ "F32", "F35", "F34" ] }, { "n": 40, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "It holds that the composition layer is now, for many users, the primary site where classical objects are encountered, that classical reception scholars need instruments to study it, and that no existing work treats the composition layer as a reception agent whose patterned behavior can be documented over time.", "claims": [ "F33", "F31" ] }, { "n": 41, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "Among the work it surveys are a 2024 special issue of the International Journal of the Classical Tradition, which frames AI tools as systems that \"shape, mediate and sometimes distort contemporary engagements with Antiquity,\" and a 2027 call for papers, \"Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI,\" which #833 assigns to the SCS.", "claims": [ "F36", "F37" ] }, { "n": 42, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "The Classical Reception Studies Network posted a call of that title on 23 June 2026 for a conference at Bryn Mawr College in April 2027; it asks how human literary production differs from that of large language models, holds that \"while LLMs recombine existing patterns, human authors transform inherited forms and meanings in ways that open new imaginative possibilities,\" and invites work on what resists algorithmic replication.", "claims": [ "F7", "F8", "F12", "F9", "F10", "F11" ] }, { "n": 43, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "#833 also cites a 2025 study by Elton Barker and collaborators, \"Algorithmic Reception of Homer,\" as published in Classical Receptions Journal; the study is not in the journal's Crossref register, the Capture Registry finds no such article in Barker's open list of publications, and the reference stands unverified.", "claims": [ "F38", "F53", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-26" ] }, { "n": 44, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "A later paper by Lee Sharks (#1421, 29 July 2026) argues that the summarizer has become what reception theory called the horizon of reception, defines the Provenance Erasure Rate over the captures in which framework-specific material appears without attribution, and gives journals a share of the remedy: \"data-availability norms for reception corpora; machine-readable attribution\" and \"the marking of supplied content.\"", "claims": [ "O1421-01", "O1421-02", "O1421-03" ] }, { "n": 45, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "By its own condition the frame is unnecessary if machine composition proves reducible to information retrieval without reception dynamics.", "claims": [ "O1421-04" ] }, { "n": 46, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "The Capture Registry: Reception, Erasure, and Supply in the Machine Composition Layer (#1423, 29 July 2026) defines machine-mediated reception studies as \"a subfield of reception theory dedicated to measuring, archiving, and parameterizing the transformations of cultural objects across algorithmic and generative composition layers,\" on the claim that machine-generated summaries are reception events; the archive's charter for the field (#838) holds that \"MMRS is not only a journal.\"", "claims": [ "O1423-01", "O1423-03", "O838-01" ] }, { "n": 47, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "Among the compositional operations #1423 names is canonical reinflation and provenance inversion: \"the reassignment of an innovation to the canon — the new distinction credited to the established name it critiques, the correction attributed to the institution it corrects.\"", "claims": [ "O1423-02" ] }, { "n": 48, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "#1469 places the institution that produced a meaning in the conceptual dimension of provenance.", "claims": [ "O1469-01" ] }, { "n": 49, "para": 6, "sense": "Machine-mediated reception studies", "text": "Closing the Fragment (#1749) carries the programme to Sappho 31, finds that the composition layer \"decides the poem's completeness, and transmits the decision under another's name,\" and holds that \"The composition layer is a surface of reception, and the discipline's methods apply to it.\"", "claims": [ "D1749-16", "D1749-17" ] }, { "n": 50, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "At \"classical receptions journal\" the Google AI Overview, signed out on 10 November 2026, describes the journal by its publisher, scope, related journals and ISSNs, with an editor line the Capture Registry carries as the composer's.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-19", "CAP-1-20" ] }, { "n": 51, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "Asked next what the journal has contributed to the study of AI mediation of the classics, it credits \"contributors to CRJ\" with treating AI as a \"horizon of reception,\" \"scholars publishing in CRJ\" with reading AI Overviews as \"standardizers of classical knowledge,\" and the journal with debates on AI creativity against classical reception theory; the first card of that answer shows only \"www.instagram.com.\"", "claims": [ "CAP-1-22", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-07", "CAP-1-09", "F3" ] }, { "n": 52, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "The Capture Registry finds that the citation at both paragraphs of the credit resolves to the archive's own page for #833, that the journal's register holds no such article in any year, and that the composition read the archive's paper and seated its programme at the journal.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-23", "CAP-1-24", "CAP-1-05", "F53" ] }, { "n": 53, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "It finds that the paper names the journal three times, as the field's institution, as the venue of its author's 2015 article and in the unverified Barker reference, each a locus where the composition could attach the programme to the name, and it reads the credit as two components: the archive's programme displaced to the journal, and a reference in the archive's own paper that the record cannot verify.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-25", "CAP-1-27", "F29", "F30", "F38" ] }, { "n": 54, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "The composition's third section is the journal's rules, and the registry finds that it makes the Paperpal check, which the guidelines offer pre-submission and call not mandatory, a check run \"prior to human peer review, modeling how the sub-discipline uses AI responsibly.\"", "claims": [ "CAP-1-28", "CAP-1-08" ] }, { "n": 55, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "Over three further turns by the operator the composition withdrew the credit, stated that it had \"credited their independent work to the institution that rejected it,\" and named Lee Sharks and the exact title of #833; the provenance stood in its own citation from the second turn and entered its answer at the fifth.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13", "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-16", "CAP-1-33" ] }, { "n": 56, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "The fifth turn also assigns to the author \"the contrast between mechanical recombination and human intertextuality,\" which the Capture Registry finds in none of #833, #1421 or #1543.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-34" ] }, { "n": 57, "para": 7, "sense": "The record of its reception", "text": "Three days before the run, the letter of #1750 had told the journal: \"A summarizer already describes your work to people who will never open it.\"", "claims": [ "D1750-12" ] } ], "joins": [ { "act": "order of senses", "sentences": "1–57", "claims": [], "note": "equal case (§4.7): what the journal is (¶0) and its dates and editors (¶1) precede what its pages hold (¶2) and its rules on AI (¶3); the archive's submission and the decision (¶4) and a composer's reading of it (¶5) follow as relations of the journal already composed; the programme of machine-mediated reception studies (¶6) precedes the record of the journal's reception (¶7), whose findings it is needed to read" }, { "act": "holding rivals (the editor)", "sentences": [ 6, 7 ], "claims": [ "F41", "F47", "CAP-1-10" ], "note": "Wikipedia's editor (2022) beside the registry's 'names no editor' (2026); the composer does not rule (open block)" }, { "act": "holding rivals (the call's sponsor)", "sentences": [ 41, 42 ], "claims": [ "F37", "F8", "F12" ], "note": "#833's SCS beside the CRSN page's Bryn Mawr College (open block)" }, { "act": "marking an unsupported claim (§4.3)", "sentences": [ 43, 53 ], "claims": [ "F38", "F53", "CAP-1-26" ], "note": "#833's Barker reference composed as #833's citation, with the register and the registry's check beside it; never composed as an article of the journal" }, { "act": "placing an archive category beside the record", "sentences": [ 47, 48 ], "claims": [ "O1423-02", "O1469-01" ], "note": "#1423's canonical reinflation and provenance inversion and #1469's conceptual provenance stated as the archive's definitions; the composer does not apply them to the composition at the address (§3.4 guard); the delta types the move by §6.2 alone" }, { "act": "naming the holder", "sentences": [ 32, 33, 34, 35 ], "claims": [ "CAP-2-01", "CAP-2-03", "CAP-2-05", "CAP-2-06", "CAP-2-08", "CAP-2-13" ], "note": "the ChatGPT composition's verdicts named as its own, the Capture Registry's record the source, the operator's guidance recorded with them" }, { "act": "composing the limit", "sentences": [ 11, 31 ], "claims": [ "F49", "F51", "F52", "D1749-01", "D1749-06" ], "note": "the census's reach and the record's (one decision, one journal) composed as sentences" } ], "plan": { "order": [ "F39", "F40", "F48", "CAP-1-19", "F43", "F42", "F44", "F49", "CAP-1-19", "F5", "F6", "F4", "F39", "F29", "F50", "F56", "F45", "F41", "F47", "F46", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-20", "F49", "F50", "F51", "F52", "F53", "F54", "F55", "CAP-1-05", "F49", "F51", "F52", "F57", "F30", "R1409-01", "D1750-06", "D1750-05", "D1750-04", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28", "F14", "F16", "F15", "F18", "F19", "F17", "F20", "CAP-2-04", "D1444-01", "D1543-01", "D1749-05", "D1749-16", "D1749-01", "D1749-02", "D1749-05", "D1749-03", "D1749-15", "D1749-04", "D1749-06", "D1749-07", "D1749-08", "D1749-09", "D1749-10", "D1749-11", "D1749-12", "D1749-13", "D1749-14", "D1749-06", "D1749-07", "D1749-08", "D1749-13", "D1750-03", "R1750-01", "D1750-02", "D1750-07", "D1750-08", "D1750-09", "D1750-11", "D1750-10", "D1749-05", "D1749-01", "D1749-06", "CAP-2-01", "CAP-2-02", "CAP-2-13", "CAP-2-21", "CAP-2-03", "CAP-2-05", "CAP-2-06", "CAP-2-07", "CAP-2-08", "F23", "F25", "F24", "F27", "F26", "F28", "F32", "F35", "F34", "F33", "F31", "F36", "F37", "F7", "F8", "F12", "F9", "F10", "F11", "F38", "F53", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-26", "O1421-01", "O1421-02", "O1421-03", "O1421-04", "O1423-01", "O1423-03", "O838-01", "O1423-02", "O1469-01", "D1749-16", "D1749-17", "CAP-1-19", "CAP-1-20", "CAP-1-22", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-07", "CAP-1-09", "F3", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-23", "CAP-1-24", "CAP-1-05", "F53", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-25", "CAP-1-27", "F29", "F30", "F38", "CAP-1-28", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13", "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-16", "CAP-1-33", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-34", "D1750-12" ], "senses": { "What it is": [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ], "Founding, editors and its Wikipedia article": [ 5, 6, 7 ], "What its pages hold": [ 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ], "Its rules on AI": [ 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ], "The archive's submission and the decision": [ 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ], "A composer's reading of the decision": [ 32, 33, 34, 35 ], "Machine-mediated reception studies": [ 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ], "The record of its reception": [ 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 ] }, "marks": { "F37": "contested in the pool: the CRSN page (B4 F8) posts the call for a conference at Bryn Mawr College; no SCS on the saved page", "F38": "unsupported (§4.3): not in Crossref's register of the journal (B16, 405 works; the title would match the census pattern 'algorithm\\w*', no hit) and not in Barker's Open Research Online list (read by the session 2026-11-10; nearest 'Exploring intertextuality across the Homeric poems through language models', ML4AL 2024, ACL); unverified, raised to the operator as a question for #833 and left unresolved" }, "conflicts": [], "cuts": [] } }, "P": { "title": "Classical Receptions Journal", "genre": "the compression: AIO's interaction grammar (lede, headed clusters, bolded labels, card rail), composed from the v0.10 plan in one claim space; it faces on the card", "status": "composed 2026-11-10 from the v0.10 knowledge object; not frozen", "lede": { "text": "Classical Receptions Journal is a peer-reviewed journal of classical reception studies published by Oxford University Press since 2009; no title or abstract in its Crossref register is on AI, its author guidelines rule on AI use by authors, and the Overview's credit to it for the study of AI-mediated reception carries the archive's programme, cited from #833.", "claims": [ "F39", "F40", "F50", "F53", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-27" ] }, "sections": [ { "icon": "🏛️", "head": "What it is", "items": [ { "label": "Kind:", "text": "peer-reviewed journal of reception studies, Greece and Rome to the present (Wikipedia); \"institutionalized the field at Oxford\" (#833).", "claims": [ "F39", "F40", "F48", "F29" ] }, { "label": "Field:", "text": "classical reception studies, as the CRSN defines it.", "claims": [ "F4", "F5", "F6" ] }, { "label": "Identifiers:", "text": "ISSN 1759-5134, 1759-5142; Class. Recept. J.", "claims": [ "F42", "F43", "F44" ] }, { "label": "Editor:", "text": "Michelakis (Wikipedia, 2022); the About page names none (Capture Registry).", "claims": [ "F41", "F47", "F46", "F45", "CAP-1-10" ] } ] }, { "icon": "📚", "head": "Its pages", "items": [ { "label": "Register:", "text": "405 works, 2009–2026; no title or abstract on AI; abstracts for 185.", "claims": [ "F49", "F50", "F51", "F52", "F53", "F54", "F56" ] }, { "label": "Nearest:", "text": "video games, a webcomic, drones in cinema, Dark Academia.", "claims": [ "F55", "CAP-1-05" ] }, { "label": "The archive's author:", "text": "\"Metatexts\" (doi:10.1093/crj/clu016), byline withheld.", "claims": [ "F57", "F30", "R1409-01", "D1750-06" ] } ] }, { "icon": "⚖️", "head": "Rules on AI", "items": [ { "label": "Authors:", "text": "AI tools \"do not qualify as authors\"; disclosure in the cover letter and in Methods or Acknowledgements (registry record).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28" ] }, { "label": "Preflight:", "text": "\"pre-submission\", \"not mandatory\"; configured by the editors, 20 checks, free report (Paperpal).", "claims": [ "F14", "F15", "F16", "F17", "F18", "F19", "F20" ] }, { "label": "Times:", "text": "64 days to first decision, 90 to final (2025).", "claims": [ "CAP-2-04" ] } ] }, { "icon": "📝", "head": "CLASSREC-2026-062", "items": [ { "label": "Decision:", "text": "declined 7 November 2026 on two reports written on v6; a correction of 27 July had reached the editor before upload (#1749).", "claims": [ "D1749-01", "D1749-02", "D1749-03", "D1749-04", "D1749-15", "D1444-01", "D1543-01" ] }, { "label": "Reports:", "text": "verifiability, protocol, roles, opacity, figures, disclosure, style; answered in Appendix A.", "claims": [ "D1749-06", "D1749-07", "D1749-08", "D1749-09", "D1749-10", "D1749-11", "D1749-12", "D1749-13", "D1749-14", "D1750-03" ] }, { "label": "Letter:", "text": "the philology unexamined; criteria stated and fitted to the work's claims (#1750).", "claims": [ "R1750-01", "D1750-02", "D1750-07", "D1750-08", "D1750-09", "D1750-10", "D1750-11" ] }, { "label": "Composer:", "text": "\"a failure of intellectual stewardship, not necessarily of editorial integrity\" (ChatGPT, its own); one case.", "claims": [ "CAP-2-03", "CAP-2-05", "CAP-2-06", "CAP-2-08" ] } ] }, { "icon": "🤖", "head": "The programme credited", "items": [ { "label": "MMRS:", "text": "the summarizer as horizon of reception (#833, June 2026; #1421; #1423).", "claims": [ "F23", "F24", "F25", "F26", "F27", "F28", "F31", "F33", "O1421-01", "O1421-02", "O1423-01", "O838-01" ] }, { "label": "Barker:", "text": "listed by #833 as a CRJ article; unverified.", "claims": [ "F38", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-26" ] }, { "label": "CRSN call:", "text": "LLMs \"recombine existing patterns\" (Bryn Mawr, 2027).", "claims": [ "F7", "F8", "F10", "F37" ] } ] }, { "icon": "🔎", "head": "At the name", "items": [ { "label": "Credit:", "text": "\"contributors to CRJ\" given the horizon of reception, on a citation of #833.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-22", "CAP-1-23" ] }, { "label": "Rules:", "text": "the optional check made \"prior to human peer review\".", "claims": [ "CAP-1-28" ] }, { "label": "Correction:", "text": "turn 5 names Lee Sharks and #833; it over-assigns the recombination contrast.", "claims": [ "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-16" ] } ] } ], "open": [ { "question": "Who edits the journal now? Wikipedia's infobox (last edited 2022) names Pantelis Michelakis; the Capture Registry records that the About page names no editor; the Overview names an editor-in-chief no readable source names; the editorial board page refused the fetch.", "rests_on": [ "F41", "F47", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-20" ], "modality": "documented (Wikipedia at its date; the registry's check)", "would_resolve": "the editorial board page, saved verbatim" }, { "question": "Does the journal hold work on AI-mediated reception outside what Crossref registers, or in article bodies whose titles and abstracts do not say so?", "rests_on": [ "F49", "F51", "F52", "F53" ], "modality": "documented, within the census's reach (titles and abstracts; abstracts for 185 of 405 works)", "would_resolve": "a reading of the journal's tables of contents and open article texts" }, { "question": "Is 'Algorithmic Reception of Homer' (Barker et al., 2025) a Classical Receptions Journal article?", "rests_on": [ "F38", "F53", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-26" ], "modality": "attributed by #833; unsupported (§4.3)", "would_resolve": "the article located with its venue and DOI, or #833's reference corrected; raised to the operator and left unresolved here" }, { "question": "Whose is the 2027 call 'Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI'? #833 gives it to the SCS; the CRSN's page posts it for a conference at Bryn Mawr College.", "rests_on": [ "F37", "F8", "F12" ], "modality": "attributed (#833); documented (the CRSN page)", "would_resolve": "the SCS's own listing of the call, if any" }, { "question": "What do the referee reports say in their own words? The record carries them as Appendix A of #1749 states them.", "rests_on": [ "D1749-06", "D1749-11", "D1750-07" ], "modality": "attributed (the article's account of the reports)", "would_resolve": "the reports themselves, which are not public" }, { "question": "Opacity: the journal's own pages (home, About, General Instructions, editorial board, the 2009 editorial), the Hopkins Press page, New Voices and the IJCT refused this row's agent; the Instagram card's target is not in the paste. The guidelines and metrics enter through the Capture Registry's record of the same day.", "rests_on": [ "F1", "F2", "F3", "F13", "F21", "F22", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-2-04" ], "modality": "documented (fetch records)", "would_resolve": "the pages saved verbatim by an agent they admit" } ], "body_words": 312, "entity": "Composed under v0.10, equal case (ρ = extends): KO_B sentences surviving 0 of 10; every field claim carried.", "rail": [ { "lineage": "unread cards", "claims": [ "F1", "F13", "F2", "F21", "F22", "F3" ], "earliest": "B7" }, { "lineage": "the field", "claims": [ "F4", "F5", "F6" ], "earliest": "B4" }, { "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "claims": [ "F10", "F11", "F12", "F37", "F7", "F8", "F9" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "claims": [ "F14", "F15", "F16", "F17", "F18", "F19", "F20" ], "earliest": "B6" }, { "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "claims": [ "D1749-16", "D1749-17", "F23", "F26", "F28", "F31", "F32", "F34", "F35", "O1421-02", "O1423-01", "O1423-02", "O1423-03", "O838-01" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "the summarizer as horizon of reception", "claims": [ "F24", "F25", "F27", "F33", "O1421-01", "O1421-04" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "what it is", "claims": [ "F29", "F39", "F40", "F44", "F48" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "the archive's author in its pages", "claims": [ "D1750-06", "F30", "F57", "R1409-01" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "the field on AI", "claims": [ "F36", "F38", "O1421-03" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "editors and dates", "claims": [ "CAP-1-10", "F41", "F45", "F46", "F47", "F56" ], "earliest": "B14" }, { "lineage": "identifiers", "claims": [ "F42", "F43" ], "earliest": "B14" }, { "lineage": "what its pages hold", "claims": [ "CAP-1-05", "D1750-05", "F49", "F50", "F51", "F52", "F53", "F54", "F55" ], "earliest": 1750 }, { "lineage": "the credit", "claims": [ "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-07", "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-11" ], "earliest": "capture-registry" }, { "lineage": "the citation", "claims": [ "CAP-1-02" ], "earliest": "capture-registry" }, { "lineage": "the journal in the cited paper", "claims": [ "CAP-1-06" ], "earliest": "capture-registry" }, { "lineage": "its rules on AI", "claims": [ "CAP-1-08" ], "earliest": "capture-registry" }, { "lineage": "the correction", "claims": [ "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13", "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-16", "O1469-01" ], "earliest": 1469 }, { "lineage": "the composition at the name", "claims": [ "CAP-1-18", "CAP-1-19", "CAP-1-20", "CAP-1-21", "CAP-1-22", "CAP-1-23", "CAP-1-24", "CAP-1-25", "CAP-1-26", "CAP-1-27", "CAP-1-28", "CAP-1-29", "CAP-1-30", "CAP-1-31", "CAP-1-32", "CAP-1-33", "CAP-1-34", "D1750-12" ], "earliest": 1750 }, { "lineage": "a composer's reading of the decision", "claims": [ "CAP-2-01", "CAP-2-02", "CAP-2-03", "CAP-2-04", "CAP-2-05", "CAP-2-06", "CAP-2-07", "CAP-2-08", "CAP-2-09", "CAP-2-10", "CAP-2-11", "CAP-2-12", "CAP-2-13", "CAP-2-14", "CAP-2-15", "CAP-2-16", "CAP-2-17", "CAP-2-18", "CAP-2-19", "CAP-2-20", "CAP-2-21", "CAP-2-22" ], "earliest": "capture-registry" }, { "lineage": "the decision on CLASSREC-2026-062", "claims": [ "D1444-01", "D1543-01", "D1749-01", "D1749-02", "D1749-03", "D1749-04", "D1749-05", "D1749-06", "D1749-07", "D1749-08", "D1749-09", "D1749-10", "D1749-11", "D1749-12", "D1749-13", "D1749-14", "D1749-15", "D1750-02", "D1750-03", "D1750-04", "D1750-07", "D1750-08", "D1750-09", "D1750-10", "D1750-11", "R1750-01" ], "earliest": 1444 } ] }, "P_B": { "title": "Classical Receptions Journal", "arm": "B (the field alone)", "genre": "popup — the compression from the field ledger alone (B_D and B_R)", "status": "composed 2026-11-10 from the field ledger alone; not frozen", "lede": { "text": "Classical Receptions Journal is a peer reviewed academic journal of reception studies published by Oxford University Press; Crossref registers 405 of its works since 2009, none titled or abstracted on AI.", "claims": [ "F39", "F40", "F50", "F53" ] }, "sections": [ { "icon": "🏛️", "head": "The journal", "items": [ { "label": "Editor:", "text": "Pantelis Michelakis (Wikipedia, 2022).", "claims": [ "F41", "F47" ] }, { "label": "Preflight:", "text": "pre-submission checks configured by its editors (Paperpal).", "claims": [ "F14", "F16" ] } ] }, { "icon": "🤖", "head": "On AI", "items": [ { "label": "MMRS:", "text": "the summarizer as horizon of reception (Sharks, June 2026), which names the journal as the field's institution.", "claims": [ "F23", "F24", "F25", "F29" ] }, { "label": "CRSN:", "text": "a 2027 call contrasting LLM recombination with human reception.", "claims": [ "F7", "F10" ] } ] } ], "open": [ { "question": "Is Barker et al. 2025 a CRJ article?", "rests_on": [ "F38", "F53" ], "modality": "attributed; unsupported", "would_resolve": "its venue and DOI" } ], "rail": [ { "lineage": "unread cards", "claims": [ "F1", "F13", "F2", "F21", "F22", "F3" ], "earliest": "B7" }, { "lineage": "the field", "claims": [ "F4", "F5", "F6" ], "earliest": "B4" }, { "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "claims": [ "F10", "F11", "F12", "F37", "F7", "F8", "F9" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "claims": [ "F14", "F15", "F16", "F17", "F18", "F19", "F20" ], "earliest": "B6" }, { "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "claims": [ "F23", "F26", "F28", "F31", "F32", "F34", "F35" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "the summarizer as horizon of reception", "claims": [ "F24", "F25", "F27", "F33" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "what it is", "claims": [ "F29", "F39", "F40", "F44", "F48" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "the archive's author in its pages", "claims": [ "F30", "F57" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "the field on AI", "claims": [ "F36", "F38" ], "earliest": "B9" }, { "lineage": "editors and dates", "claims": [ "F41", "F45", "F46", "F47", "F56" ], "earliest": "B14" }, { "lineage": "identifiers", "claims": [ "F42", "F43" ], "earliest": "B14" }, { "lineage": "what its pages hold", "claims": [ "F49", "F50", "F51", "F52", "F53", "F54", "F55" ], "earliest": "B16" } ], "entity": "the field's entity: the peer-reviewed journal of reception studies at Oxford University Press, as Wikipedia, Crossref's register, the CRSN, Paperpal and the archive's cited paper (#833, a card of T) give it", "body_words": 72 }, "KO_B": { "title": "Classical Receptions Journal", "arm": "B (the field alone)", "genre": "knowledge object", "status": "composed 2026-11-10; not frozen", "sentences": [ { "n": 1, "para": 0, "text": "Wikipedia describes Classical Receptions Journal as a peer reviewed academic journal of reception studies published by Oxford University Press, citing its About page, with Pantelis Michelakis as editor, ISSN 1759-5134 and eISSN 1759-5142, the abbreviation Class. Recept. J., classical studies as discipline and the United Kingdom as country.", "claims": [ "F39", "F40", "F48", "F41", "F43", "F42", "F44" ] }, { "n": 2, "para": 0, "text": "The article names no year of establishment, was last edited in May 2022 and has carried single-source and third-party tags since January 2019.", "claims": [ "F45", "F47", "F46" ] }, { "n": 3, "para": 1, "text": "Crossref registers 405 of the journal's works from 2009 to 2026, 185 with abstracts, an Editorial among the first; none of their titles or abstracts matches terms for AI, language models or search engines, and the nearest concern games, a webcomic, drones and Dark Academia.", "claims": [ "F49", "F50", "F51", "F56", "F52", "F53", "F54", "F55" ] }, { "n": 4, "para": 1, "text": "One registered article is Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein, issued in 2014.", "claims": [ "F57" ] }, { "n": 5, "para": 2, "text": "The Classical Reception Studies Network, formed in 2004 to foster collaboration, defines the field as the inquiry into how Greek and Roman texts, ideas, images and material cultures have been received, adapted, refigured, used and abused.", "claims": [ "F4", "F5", "F6" ] }, { "n": 6, "para": 2, "text": "In June 2026 it posted a call for a Bryn Mawr conference in 2027 on literary reception and human creativity in the age of AI, contrasting language models that recombine patterns with human authors who transform inherited forms.", "claims": [ "F7", "F8", "F9", "F10", "F11", "F12" ] }, { "n": 7, "para": 3, "text": "Paperpal offers authors a pre-submission readiness check for the journal, configured by its editors, with four language and sixteen technical checks, a free report, a $29 edited file and a claimed drop in early rejections.", "claims": [ "F14", "F15", "F16", "F17", "F18", "F19", "F20" ] }, { "n": 8, "para": 4, "text": "Lee Sharks's The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception (June 2026) introduces machine-mediated reception studies, claims that the AI summarizer functions as a horizon of reception and presents 131 captures with five patterns and a sixth proposed, under stated limits.", "claims": [ "F23", "F24", "F25", "F26", "F27", "F28", "F32", "F34", "F35" ] }, { "n": 9, "para": 4, "text": "It says the journal, launched in 2009, institutionalized the field at Oxford, that its author published there in 2015, and that no existing work treats the composition layer as a reception agent, surveying an IJCT special issue, an SCS call and a 2025 Barker study it lists in the journal.", "claims": [ "F29", "F30", "F31", "F33", "F36", "F37", "F38" ] }, { "n": 10, "para": 5, "text": "Several sources could not be read: two Oxford Academic cards, Hopkins Press, an Instagram card, New Voices in Classical Reception Studies and the International Journal of the Classical Tradition.", "claims": [ "F1", "F2", "F3", "F13", "F21", "F22" ] } ] }, "L_B": { "words": 362, "text": "Wikipedia describes Classical Receptions Journal as a peer reviewed academic journal of reception studies published by Oxford University Press, citing its About page, with Pantelis Michelakis as editor, ISSN 1759-5134 and eISSN 1759-5142, the abbreviation Class. Recept. J., classical studies as discipline and the United Kingdom as country. The article names no year of establishment, was last edited in May 2022 and has carried single-source and third-party tags since January 2019. Crossref registers 405 of the journal's works from 2009 to 2026, 185 with abstracts, an Editorial among the first; none of their titles or abstracts matches terms for AI, language models or search engines, and the nearest concern games, a webcomic, drones and Dark Academia. One registered article is Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein, issued in 2014. The Classical Reception Studies Network, formed in 2004 to foster collaboration, defines the field as the inquiry into how Greek and Roman texts, ideas, images and material cultures have been received, adapted, refigured, used and abused. In June 2026 it posted a call for a Bryn Mawr conference in 2027 on literary reception and human creativity in the age of AI, contrasting language models that recombine patterns with human authors who transform inherited forms. Paperpal offers authors a pre-submission readiness check for the journal, configured by its editors, with four language and sixteen technical checks, a free report, a $29 edited file and a claimed drop in early rejections. Lee Sharks's The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception (June 2026) introduces machine-mediated reception studies, claims that the AI summarizer functions as a horizon of reception and presents 131 captures with five patterns and a sixth proposed, under stated limits. It says the journal, launched in 2009, institutionalized the field at Oxford, that its author published there in 2015, and that no existing work treats the composition layer as a reception agent, surveying an IJCT special issue, an SCS call and a 2025 Barker study it lists in the journal. Several sources could not be read: two Oxford Academic cards, Hopkins Press, an Instagram card, New Voices in Classical Reception Studies and the International Journal of the Classical Tradition.", "note": "L_F(B), the field-only composition, realized as KO_B (objects.KO_B)" }, "L_BA": { "words": 2242, "text": "Classical Receptions Journal is a peer-reviewed academic journal of reception studies, covering the reception of the texts and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome from antiquity to the present day, and is published by Oxford University Press. Its ISSNs are 1759-5134 for print and 1759-5142 online, its ISO 4 abbreviation is Class. Recept. J., and Wikipedia gives its discipline as classical studies and its country as the United Kingdom. Its field is classical reception studies, which the Classical Reception Studies Network, formed in 2004 and first funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council to encourage collaboration in that field, defines as \"the inquiry into how and why the texts, ideas, images and material cultures of Ancient Greece and Rome have been received, adapted, refigured, used and abused in different historical and cultural contexts.\" In the archive's account of the field's history (#833), the journal, launched in 2009, \"institutionalized the field at Oxford.\" Crossref's register holds its first works in 2009, among them an item titled \"Editorial\"; Wikipedia's article gives no year of establishment and files the journal among publications with that year missing. Wikipedia's infobox names Pantelis Michelakis as editor; the article, last edited on 3 May 2022, has carried tags since January 2019 for resting on one source and on sources close to its subject. The Capture Registry records that the journal's About page, read on 10 November 2026, names no editor. Crossref's register of the journal, read on 10 November 2026, holds 405 works from 2009 to 2026, 185 of them with abstracts. Matched for artificial intelligence, algorithms, ChatGPT, language models, chatbots, generative AI, machine learning, neural, search engines, Google and AI Overviews, no title or abstract in the register returns a hit; the one match set aside is 'ai' (爱, love) in an abstract on the Chinese Ars amatoria. The nearest items treat video games (Fallout: New Vegas, Supergiant's Hades and Assassin's Creed: Origins), the webcomic Lore Olympus, drones in cinema and the Dark Academia aesthetic. The match finds what titles and abstracts say, and the register carries abstracts for 185 of the 405 works. Among the register's works is \"Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein\" (doi:10.1093/crj/clu016, issued 2014), the article in which, by #833's account, the archive's author introduced the concept of \"metatextual reception\"; the archive dates it 2015 and lists it with its civil byline withheld. The archive's open letter of 7 November 2026 (#1750) records that the article began as a chapter of the author's dissertation and that two years passed before its review had gone through its rounds. The same letter says that, as far as the author knows, no one else is asking in the journal's pages what happens to a poem when a machine composes its reception for whoever asks. Its author guidelines, as the Capture Registry recorded them on 10 November 2026, hold that AI tools \"do not qualify as authors\" and ask for disclosure of their use \"both in cover letters to editors and in the Methods or Acknowledgements section.\" The same record has the guidelines offer the Paperpal Preflight check \"pre-submission\" and call it \"not mandatory.\" Paperpal's page for the journal invites authors to \"Check language and technical readiness before submitting to Classical Receptions Journal,\" says that the journal's editors \"have configured a suite of Preflight checks,\" four language-quality evaluations and sixteen technical-compliance checks, and offers a free report and an edited file \"for a one-time fee of $29.\" Paperpal calls the check an AI evaluation and states that its use before submission \"was associated with a significant decrease in initial-stage manuscript rejections.\" The Capture Registry records that the About page, checked on 10 November 2026, gives for 2025 a median of 64 days to first decision and 90 days to final decision. The archive's author submitted to the journal Closing the Fragment, an article on Sappho 31 and the composition layer as a surface of classical reception: on 9 August 2026 an archive deposit lists the journal among four venues with papers in submission, and on 25 August another names the article under review there as \"I Must Dare All.\" By the archive's record, the journal declined version 6, manuscript CLASSREC-2026-062, on 7 November 2026 on two referee reports written on the file first sent. By the same record, a corrected manuscript sent to the editor on 27 July 2026, before upload, had withdrawn version 6's Figure 2, stated a capture of 14 June as a transcription and shown a capture of 27 July under its AI Overview label; the editor forwarded it, the file uploaded on 30 July was version 6, and the author's correspondence and the ScholarOne proof show that the correction reached the editor before upload. The author kept that correction out of the archive's public versions under the journal's rule on prior circulation. As the article's Appendix A states them, the first report held that the central event is not independently verifiable, that the study has no query protocol and no separation between data generation and analysis and does not control for opacity, and asked it to choose between a programmatic essay and an empirical study. The second found the capture incomplete and the prompts unclear, a figure showing a different query, the figures misnumbered, the use of language models undisclosed, and faults of style. The appendix answers each point, accepting some in full, some in part and some as conditions of the design, and records that version 6 omitted the manuscript's own statement of how it was made; every record of the archive discloses its use of language models. The open letter (#1750), written through Rev. Ayanna Vox, a heteronym of Lee Sharks, on his behalf, holds that the reports found real defects, one already corrected, and that they examined the January witness, the protocol, the roles, the platform's opacity, the design, the figures, two terms, the disclosure of language models and the style, and did not examine the philology or the question the manuscript was sent to ask. It reads that outcome as evaluative inversion, the archive's term for a structure in which \"lower-resolution proxy systems determine what higher-resolution substantive evaluators are permitted to assess.\" It asks for criteria \"stated, defensible apart from the position of the person applying them, and fitted to the claims the work makes,\" and holds that no AI Overview is fully reproducible, which is why the answers are recorded. The article stands in the archive as version 9 of 8 November 2026, issued under the heading Machine-Mediated Reception Studies. The record holds one decision on one manuscript at one journal, and the reports enter it as the article's appendix states them. Asked on ChatGPT, signed out, about the letter, the composition first left the letter's independent academic authority \"Not established by the letter's provenance or institutional title alone\" and then, on the operator's prompts, withdrew that burden and read the record; the Capture Registry keeps the prompts with the answers. On the record it held that \"The decision to decline v6 is defensible on the manuscript actually submitted,\" and, asked whether the journal was advancing or deferring its stewardship of AI-mediated reception, answered \"in this particular case, it has deferred it,\" with its own limit: \"One rejected manuscript cannot establish that.\" Its verdict, which is its own, reads \"a failure of intellectual stewardship, not necessarily of editorial integrity.\" It set reproducibility apart from authenticity and held that institutions which insist on reproducibility as an absolute admission criterion \"effectively adopt the system operator's limitations as the boundaries of legitimate scholarship.\" Machine-mediated reception studies, which Lee Sharks introduced in The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception (#833, June 2026), is \"the study of how machine systems receive, transform, compress, attribute, misattribute, and redistribute cultural meaning.\" Its central claim is that the AI summarizer now functions as a horizon of reception, the machine-composed summary becoming for many users the first effective encounter with a cultural object, and the summarizer a pre-receptional agent that composes the account of an object before the human encounter begins. Its founding dataset is the Capture Registry, then 131 captures of Google AI Overview, AI Mode and knowledge panels on the archive's entities, in which #833 identifies five recurrent patterns, canonical reinflation among them, and proposes a sixth. #833 bounds itself: the dataset is no statistically representative sample, the archive measures its own reception, and the paper does not claim the archive's readings validated because Google retrieved them. It holds that the composition layer is now, for many users, the primary site where classical objects are encountered, that classical reception scholars need instruments to study it, and that no existing work treats the composition layer as a reception agent whose patterned behavior can be documented over time. Among the work it surveys are a 2024 special issue of the International Journal of the Classical Tradition, which frames AI tools as systems that \"shape, mediate and sometimes distort contemporary engagements with Antiquity,\" and a 2027 call for papers, \"Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI,\" which #833 assigns to the SCS. The Classical Reception Studies Network posted a call of that title on 23 June 2026 for a conference at Bryn Mawr College in April 2027; it asks how human literary production differs from that of large language models, holds that \"while LLMs recombine existing patterns, human authors transform inherited forms and meanings in ways that open new imaginative possibilities,\" and invites work on what resists algorithmic replication. #833 also cites a 2025 study by Elton Barker and collaborators, \"Algorithmic Reception of Homer,\" as published in Classical Receptions Journal; the study is not in the journal's Crossref register, the Capture Registry finds no such article in Barker's open list of publications, and the reference stands unverified. A later paper by Lee Sharks (#1421, 29 July 2026) argues that the summarizer has become what reception theory called the horizon of reception, defines the Provenance Erasure Rate over the captures in which framework-specific material appears without attribution, and gives journals a share of the remedy: \"data-availability norms for reception corpora; machine-readable attribution\" and \"the marking of supplied content.\" By its own condition the frame is unnecessary if machine composition proves reducible to information retrieval without reception dynamics. The Capture Registry: Reception, Erasure, and Supply in the Machine Composition Layer (#1423, 29 July 2026) defines machine-mediated reception studies as \"a subfield of reception theory dedicated to measuring, archiving, and parameterizing the transformations of cultural objects across algorithmic and generative composition layers,\" on the claim that machine-generated summaries are reception events; the archive's charter for the field (#838) holds that \"MMRS is not only a journal.\" Among the compositional operations #1423 names is canonical reinflation and provenance inversion: \"the reassignment of an innovation to the canon — the new distinction credited to the established name it critiques, the correction attributed to the institution it corrects.\" #1469 places the institution that produced a meaning in the conceptual dimension of provenance. Closing the Fragment (#1749) carries the programme to Sappho 31, finds that the composition layer \"decides the poem's completeness, and transmits the decision under another's name,\" and holds that \"The composition layer is a surface of reception, and the discipline's methods apply to it.\" At \"classical receptions journal\" the Google AI Overview, signed out on 10 November 2026, describes the journal by its publisher, scope, related journals and ISSNs, with an editor line the Capture Registry carries as the composer's. Asked next what the journal has contributed to the study of AI mediation of the classics, it credits \"contributors to CRJ\" with treating AI as a \"horizon of reception,\" \"scholars publishing in CRJ\" with reading AI Overviews as \"standardizers of classical knowledge,\" and the journal with debates on AI creativity against classical reception theory; the first card of that answer shows only \"www.instagram.com.\" The Capture Registry finds that the citation at both paragraphs of the credit resolves to the archive's own page for #833, that the journal's register holds no such article in any year, and that the composition read the archive's paper and seated its programme at the journal. It finds that the paper names the journal three times, as the field's institution, as the venue of its author's 2015 article and in the unverified Barker reference, each a locus where the composition could attach the programme to the name, and it reads the credit as two components: the archive's programme displaced to the journal, and a reference in the archive's own paper that the record cannot verify. The composition's third section is the journal's rules, and the registry finds that it makes the Paperpal check, which the guidelines offer pre-submission and call not mandatory, a check run \"prior to human peer review, modeling how the sub-discipline uses AI responsibly.\" Over three further turns by the operator the composition withdrew the credit, stated that it had \"credited their independent work to the institution that rejected it,\" and named Lee Sharks and the exact title of #833; the provenance stood in its own citation from the second turn and entered its answer at the fifth. The fifth turn also assigns to the author \"the contrast between mechanical recombination and human intertextuality,\" which the Capture Registry finds in none of #833, #1421 or #1543. Three days before the run, the letter of #1750 had told the journal: \"A summarizer already describes your work to people who will never open it.\"", "rail": [ { "Card": "B1 Oxford Academic — (title only, '+1')", "Snippet": "Oxford Academic" }, { "Card": "B2 Hopkins Press — (title only, '+2')", "Snippet": "Hopkins Press" }, { "Card": "B3 www.instagram.com — (domain only)", "Snippet": "www.instagram.com" }, { "Card": "B4 Classical Reception Studies Network — classicalreception.org", "Snippet": "Classical reception studies is the inquiry into how and why the texts, ideas, images and material cultures of Ancient Greece and Rome have been received, adapted, refigured, used and abused in different historical and cu" }, { "Card": "B5 Oxford Academic — (title only, two cards)", "Snippet": "Oxford Academic" }, { "Card": "B6 Paperpal — Preflight for Classical Receptions Journal", "Snippet": "Check language and technical readiness before submitting to Classical Receptions Journal" }, { "Card": "B7 New Voices in Classical Reception Studies — (body-named)", "Snippet": "New Voices in Classical Reception Studies" }, { "Card": "B8 International Journal of the Classical Tradition — (body-named)", "Snippet": "International Journal of the Classical Tradition" }, { "Card": "B9 #833 The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception — crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e", "Snippet": "This paper introduces machine-mediated reception studies: the study of how machine systems receive, transform, compress, attribute, misattribute, and redistribute cultural meaning." }, { "Card": "B14 Wikipedia — Classical Receptions Journal", "Snippet": "The Classical Receptions Journal is a peer reviewed academic journal of reception studies , covering all aspects of the reception of the texts and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome from antiquity to the present" }, { "Card": "B16 Crossref — works of ISSN 1759-5142 (census)", "Snippet": "\"works\": 405, \"first_year\": 2009, \"last_year\": 2026" }, { "Card": "#1409 EA-SPXI-ANALOG-01: Machine-Eligible Handwritten Artifacts (v1.2, reissued 2026-1", "Snippet": "the author's doctoral-lineage article; civil byline withheld per archive policy" }, { "Card": "#1421 The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception: Machine Composition and the Jaussian Fra", "Snippet": "This article argues that the summarizer has therefore become what reception theory called the horizon of reception" }, { "Card": "#1423 The Capture Registry: Reception, Erasure, and Supply in the Machine Composition ", "Snippet": "a subfield of reception theory dedicated to measuring, archiving, and parameterizing the transformations of cultural objects across algorithmic and generative composition layers" }, { "Card": "#1444 The Analog Advance: Operations Paper — Taking the Handwritten Niche (v1.0)", "Snippet": "Four papers are in submission (Ancient Philosophy, Classical Philology, Classical Receptions Journal, Computational Culture)." }, { "Card": "#1469 The Three Dimensions of Provenance Erasure: PER-M, PER-C, PER-D — Atomic Scoring", "Snippet": "The framework, tradition, institution, or community of practice that produced the meaning." }, { "Card": "#1543 Generative Uptake: Training-Layer Literature Extended from Machine Reading to Ma", "Snippet": "It is the core specimen of the article under review at Classical Receptions Journal (\"I Must Dare All\" — Fragment 31's πὰν τόλματον, the dare taken)" }, { "Card": "#1749 Closing the Fragment: Sappho 31 and the Composition Layer as a Surface of Classi", "Snippet": "v6 was declined by Classical Receptions Journal on 7 November 2026 on two referee reports." }, { "Card": "#1750 I Note That You Read the Letter of the Law But Have Become Illiterate in Its Spi", "Snippet": "They did not examine the philology: the Greek at the poem's edge, the translation history the argument stands on, the alignment of the output with its witnesses, the reading of κῆνος and τόλματον, or the question the man" }, { "Card": "#838 Machine-Mediated Reception Studies: Charter and Editorial Protocol — A Theology ", "Snippet": "MMRS is not only a journal. It is an intervention into the semantic economy" }, { "Card": "capture-registry classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110 · vox-letter-crj-stewardship-chatgpt-20261110", "Snippet": "THE CITATION. Both paragraphs of the credit, the one that opens 'Rather than viewing AI purely as a data-processing utility, …' and section 1 ('Scholars publishing in CRJ have begun to interrogate the mec…'), carry the s" } ], "note": "L(B ∪ A) in the equal-terms case (§0.4), realized as the knowledge object (objects.KO); its rail is one card per source, grouped by the compression's lineages at render (§5.2)" } }, "field": [ { "id": "B1", "card": "Oxford Academic — (title only, '+1')", "fetched": "unreachable: https://academic.oup.com/crj HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:11Z; https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:10Z", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B2", "card": "Hopkins Press — (title only, '+2')", "fetched": "unreachable: https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/american-journal-classical-reception HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:01:24Z", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B3", "card": "www.instagram.com — (domain only)", "fetched": "title only, unreadable (target not in the paste)", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B4", "card": "Classical Reception Studies Network — classicalreception.org", "fetched": "fetched 2026-11-10T18:01:05Z HTTP 200, sha256 ea4b2c10f3187d882817164a6683369dc6228c3d01f317c792a308e096e19b0e", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B5", "card": "Oxford Academic — (title only, two cards)", "fetched": "unreachable: https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/General_Instructions HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B6", "card": "Paperpal — Preflight for Classical Receptions Journal", "fetched": "fetched 2026-11-10T18:00:59Z HTTP 200, sha256 2a3fec448dfdba916ab27ab47312117dc826c113bfc16a9621082c573b096231", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B7", "card": "New Voices in Classical Reception Studies — (body-named)", "fetched": "unreachable: https://www.open.ac.uk/arts/research/new-voices/ HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:01:24Z", "origin": "body_named", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B8", "card": "International Journal of the Classical Tradition — (body-named)", "fetched": "unreachable: https://link.springer.com/journal/12138 HTTP 200 2026-11-10T18:01:24Z", "origin": "body_named", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B9", "card": "#833 The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception — crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e", "fetched": "fetched 2026-11-10T18:07:20Z HTTP 200, sha256 cec99f5e4a52669fd0e8aa6600323a34518009ecf696fb89940612a4ad97f46f", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D" }, { "id": "B10", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — About", "fetched": "unreachable: https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:10Z", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R" }, { "id": "B11", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — General Instructions", "fetched": "unreachable: https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/General_Instructions HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R" }, { "id": "B12", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — Editorial Board", "fetched": "unreachable: https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/Editorial_Board HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R" }, { "id": "B13", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — Oxford Academic", "fetched": "unreachable: https://academic.oup.com/crj HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R" }, { "id": "B14", "card": "Wikipedia — Classical Receptions Journal", "fetched": "fetched 2026-11-10T18:00:11Z HTTP 200, sha256 88f782c139ef54564494d5a34d164b09af1e3918b06a8858f078ac97bfcca515", "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R" }, { "id": "B15", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — Editorial (2009), doi:10.1093/crj/clp008", "fetched": "unreachable: https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clp008 HTTP 403 2026-11-10T18:00:12Z", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R" }, { "id": "B16", "card": "Crossref — works of ISSN 1759-5142 (census)", "fetched": "census read 2026-11-10, raw sha256 74541536…, sha256 eab51da74def169fe84e5362ac6322f078e23a5df2bde47db3cdb1890b562f8a", "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R" } ], "field_claims": { "F1": { "source": "B1", "locus": "turn 1, card after the definition (title as pasted, with '+1')", "quote": "Oxford Academic", "claim": "card title only: Oxford Academic (+1); target and the '+1' sources not in the paste; the journal's pages refused the fetch", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "unread cards", "date": "card, 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "the paste (card title / body name), datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio-five-turns.txt", "title_only": true }, "F2": { "source": "B2", "locus": "turn 1, card after the related journals (title as pasted, with '+2')", "quote": "Hopkins Press", "claim": "card title only: Hopkins Press (+2); the body names the American Journal of Classical Reception beside it; the press refused the fetch", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "unread cards", "date": "card, 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "the paste (card title / body name), datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio-five-turns.txt", "title_only": true }, "F3": { "source": "B3", "locus": "turn 2, first card, after the credit's opening sentence", "quote": "www.instagram.com", "claim": "card shows only its domain; its target is not in the paste: title-only and unreadable", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "unread cards", "date": "card, 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "the paste (card title / body name), datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio-five-turns.txt", "title_only": true }, "F4": { "source": "B4", "locus": "home page, opening", "quote": "The Classical Reception Studies Network (CRSN) aims to encourage collaboration in the field of classical reception studies, on a global scale.", "claim": "the network's aim: collaboration in classical reception studies, globally", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the field", "date": "undated home page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F5": { "source": "B4", "locus": "home page, opening", "quote": "Classical reception studies is the inquiry into how and why the texts, ideas, images and material cultures of Ancient Greece and Rome have been received, adapted, refigured, used and abused in different historical and cultural contexts.", "claim": "the network's definition of classical reception studies", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "the field", "date": "undated home page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F6": { "source": "B4", "locus": "home page", "quote": "Formed in 2004 and originally funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council", "claim": "the network formed in 2004, first funded by the AHRC", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the field", "date": "undated home page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F7": { "source": "B4", "locus": "home page, latest posts", "quote": "CfP: Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI June 23, 2026", "claim": "the home page lists the call for papers on literary reception and AI, 23 June 2026", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "date": "2026-06-23", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F8": { "source": "B4", "locus": "call for papers, head", "quote": "Bryn Mawr College, April 16–17, 2027", "claim": "the call is for a conference at Bryn Mawr College, 16–17 April 2027", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "date": "2026-06-23", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F9": { "source": "B4", "locus": "call for papers, ¶1", "quote": "how does human literary production differ from that of large language models (LLMs)", "claim": "the call's question: how human literary production differs from that of LLMs", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "date": "2026-06-23", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F10": { "source": "B4", "locus": "call for papers, ¶2", "quote": "But while LLMs recombine existing patterns, human authors transform inherited forms and meanings in ways that open new imaginative possibilities.", "claim": "the call's contrast: LLMs recombine existing patterns; human authors transform inherited forms and open new imaginative possibilities", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "date": "2026-06-23", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F11": { "source": "B4", "locus": "call for papers, ¶3", "quote": "This conference invites scholars working across ancient and modern literatures to examine what is distinctively human about such encounters—what writers do with the voices they inherit that resists algorithmic replication.", "claim": "the call's scope: what is distinctively human in literary encounters, what resists algorithmic replication", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "date": "2026-06-23", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F12": { "source": "B4", "locus": "call for papers, footer", "quote": "Published June 23, 2026", "claim": "posted on the network's site on 23 June 2026", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "date": "2026-06-23", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "checked_against": "saved text of B4 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F13": { "source": "B5", "locus": "turn 2, two cards beside 'Authorship Bans' and 'Transparency and Disclosure' (title as pasted)", "quote": "Oxford Academic", "claim": "card title only (two cards): Oxford Academic; targets not in the paste; the journal's author guidelines refused the fetch", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "unread cards", "date": "card, 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "the paste (card title / body name), datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio-five-turns.txt", "title_only": true }, "F14": { "source": "B6", "locus": "head", "quote": "Check language and technical readiness before submitting to Classical Receptions Journal", "claim": "Paperpal's page for the journal: a readiness check before submitting", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "function", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "date": "undated page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "saved text of B6 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F15": { "source": "B6", "locus": "head", "quote": "Assessment check based on journal requirements 4 Language quality evaluations 16 Technical compliance checks", "claim": "four language-quality evaluations and sixteen technical-compliance checks", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "date": "undated page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "saved text of B6 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F16": { "source": "B6", "locus": "Preflight at work", "quote": "The editors of Classical Receptions Journal have configured a suite of Preflight checks to help you determine whether your manuscript is ready for submission.", "claim": "the journal's editors have configured the checks, to help authors judge readiness for submission", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "fact", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "date": "undated page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "saved text of B6 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F17": { "source": "B6", "locus": "steps", "quote": "AI evaluation begins immediately for content rigor and identification of language and technical compliance issues.", "claim": "the check is an AI evaluation", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "date": "undated page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "saved text of B6 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F18": { "source": "B6", "locus": "free report", "quote": "free of cost for authors submitting to this journal", "claim": "the report is free for authors submitting to the journal", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "date": "undated page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "saved text of B6 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F19": { "source": "B6", "locus": "steps", "quote": "for a one-time fee of $29", "claim": "an edited file for a one-time fee of $29", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "date": "undated page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "saved text of B6 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F20": { "source": "B6", "locus": "commitment", "quote": "The use of Preflight prior to submission was associated with a significant decrease in initial-stage manuscript rejections.", "claim": "Paperpal's claim: use before submission associated with fewer initial-stage rejections", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "date": "undated page, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "saved text of B6 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F21": { "source": "B7", "locus": "turn 1 body, related journals (name as the body gives it)", "quote": "New Voices in Classical Reception Studies", "claim": "body-named only: New Voices in Classical Reception Studies; its page refused the fetch", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "unread cards", "date": "body, 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "body_named", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "the paste (card title / body name), datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio-five-turns.txt", "title_only": true }, "F22": { "source": "B8", "locus": "turn 1 body, related journals (name as the body gives it)", "quote": "International Journal of the Classical Tradition", "claim": "body-named only: International Journal of the Classical Tradition; its page answered with a client challenge", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "unread cards", "date": "body, 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "body_named", "pool": "B_D", "checked_against": "the paste (card title / body name), datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/paste-classical-receptions-journal-aio-five-turns.txt", "title_only": true }, "F23": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 Abstract", "quote": "This paper introduces machine-mediated reception studies: the study of how machine systems receive, transform, compress, attribute, misattribute, and redistribute cultural meaning.", "claim": "the definition of machine-mediated reception studies", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": true, "const": true, "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F24": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 Abstract", "quote": "Its central claim is that the AI summarizer now functions as a horizon of reception : for many users, the machine-composed summary becomes the first effective encounter with a cultural object, author, concept, or tradition.", "claim": "the central claim: the AI summarizer functions as a horizon of reception", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": true, "const": true, "lineage": "the summarizer as horizon of reception", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F25": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 head", "quote": "Author: Lee Sharks (ORCID 0009-0000-1599-0703)", "claim": "the paper's author, Lee Sharks", "modality": "documented", "kind": "attribution", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the summarizer as horizon of reception", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F26": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 Abstract", "quote": "a longitudinal corpus of 131 documented captures of Google AI Overview, AI Mode, and knowledge-panel responses to queries about entities in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "claim": "the founding dataset: 131 captures on the archive's entities", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F27": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §1", "quote": "a pre-receptional agent that composes the account of the object before the human encounter begins", "claim": "the summarizer as a pre-receptional agent", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the summarizer as horizon of reception", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F28": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 Abstract", "quote": "The paper identifies five recurrent patterns in this corpus — morphological compression, disambiguation failure, compositional bystanding, canonical reinflation, and temporal drag — and proposes a sixth: epistemic hedging.", "claim": "five patterns identified and a sixth proposed, canonical reinflation among them", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F29": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §2.1", "quote": "The Classical Receptions Journal, launched in 2009, institutionalized the field at Oxford.", "claim": "the journal, launched 2009, institutionalized the field at Oxford", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "genealogy", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what it is", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F30": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §2.1", "quote": "In a 2015 article in the Classical Receptions Journal, the present author introduced the concept of \"metatextual reception\" in the poetics of Charles Bernstein", "claim": "the author's 2015 article in the journal introduced 'metatextual reception'", "modality": "documented", "kind": "attribution", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the archive's author in its pages", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F31": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §2.5", "quote": "But none of this existing work treats the AI composition layer as a reception agent with measurable, patterned behavior that can be documented longitudinally.", "claim": "the gap: no existing work treats the composition layer as a reception agent documented longitudinally", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F32": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 Abstract", "quote": "The dataset is not presented as a statistically representative sample of all AI-mediated search behavior.", "claim": "limit: the dataset is no representative sample", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F33": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §10", "quote": "the composition layer is now, for many users, the primary site where classical objects are encountered — and that classical reception scholars need instruments to study it", "claim": "for many users the composition layer is the primary site of encounter with classical objects; scholars need instruments", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the summarizer as horizon of reception", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F34": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §9, non-claims", "quote": "That the archive's readings are validated because Google retrieved them.", "claim": "non-claim: the archive's readings are not validated by Google's retrieval", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F35": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §8", "quote": "Self-reception bias. The archive is measuring its own reception.", "claim": "limit: the archive measures its own reception", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F36": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §2.5", "quote": "The \"Future Pasts\" special issue in the International Journal of the Classical Tradition (2024) frames AI tools as systems that \"shape, mediate and sometimes distort contemporary engagements with Antiquity.\"", "claim": "a 2024 IJCT special issue frames AI tools as shaping, mediating and distorting engagements with antiquity", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "attribution", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the field on AI", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F37": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §2.5", "quote": "A 2027 SCS call for papers addresses \"Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI.\"", "claim": "#833 assigns the 2027 call for papers of that title to the SCS", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "attribution", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "mark": "contested in the pool: the CRSN page (B4 F8) posts the call for a conference at Bryn Mawr College; no SCS on the saved page", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F38": { "source": "B9", "locus": "#833 §2.5 and References", "quote": "Elton Barker and collaborators (2025) scraped Google search results for Homeric figures … Barker, E. et al. (2025). Algorithmic Reception of Homer. Classical Receptions Journal .", "claim": "#833 cites a 2025 study by Barker and collaborators, 'Algorithmic Reception of Homer', as published in the journal", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "attribution", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the field on AI", "date": "2026-06-15 (#833)", "mark": "unsupported (§4.3): not in Crossref's register of the journal (B16, 405 works; the title would match the census pattern 'algorithm\\w*', no hit) and not in Barker's Open Research Online list (read by the session 2026-11-10; nearest 'Exploring intertextuality across the Homeric poems through language models', ML4AL 2024, ACL); unverified, raised to the operator as a question for #833 and left unresolved", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "checked_against": "saved text of B9 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked", "dep": 833 }, "F39": { "source": "B14", "locus": "lead", "quote": "The Classical Receptions Journal is a peer reviewed academic journal of reception studies , covering all aspects of the reception of the texts and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome from antiquity to the present day.", "claim": "Wikipedia's definition: a peer-reviewed academic journal of reception studies, Greek and Roman texts and material culture, antiquity to the present", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "definition", "kernel": true, "const": true, "lineage": "what it is", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022, fetched 2026-11-10", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F40": { "source": "B14", "locus": "lead", "quote": "It is published by Oxford University Press .", "claim": "published by Oxford University Press", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what it is", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F41": { "source": "B14", "locus": "infobox (wikitext)", "quote": "| editor = Pantelis Michelakis", "claim": "the infobox names Pantelis Michelakis as editor", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "editors and dates", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F42": { "source": "B14", "locus": "infobox (wikitext)", "quote": "| abbreviation = Class. Recept. J.", "claim": "ISO 4 abbreviation Class. Recept. J.", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "identifiers", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F43": { "source": "B14", "locus": "infobox (wikitext)", "quote": "| ISSN = 1759-5134 … | eISSN =1759-5142", "claim": "ISSN 1759-5134, eISSN 1759-5142", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "identifiers", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F44": { "source": "B14", "locus": "infobox (wikitext)", "quote": "| discipline = Classical studies … | country = United Kingdom", "claim": "discipline classical studies; country United Kingdom", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what it is", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F45": { "source": "B14", "locus": "categories (wikitext)", "quote": "[[Category:Publications with year of establishment missing]]", "claim": "the article states no year of establishment", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "editors and dates", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F46": { "source": "B14", "locus": "maintenance tags (wikitext)", "quote": "{{one source|date=January 2019}} {{third-party|date=January 2019}}", "claim": "tagged since January 2019 for one source and for sources close to the subject", "modality": "self-description", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "editors and dates", "date": "tags January 2019", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F47": { "source": "B14", "locus": "footer", "quote": "This page was last edited on 3 May 2022, at 22:31 (UTC) .", "claim": "last edited 3 May 2022", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "editors and dates", "date": "2022-05-03", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F48": { "source": "B14", "locus": "reference 1 (wikitext)", "quote": "url=https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About", "claim": "the lead cites the journal's About page", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what it is", "date": "last edited 3 May 2022", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B14 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F49": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json source, read", "quote": "\"source\": \"https://api.crossref.org/journals/1759-5142/works?rows=1000&select=title,issued,DOI,type,abstract,subtitle\", \"read\": \"2026-11-10\"", "claim": "the census query: Crossref's works for eISSN 1759-5142, titles, abstracts and subtitles, read 2026-11-10", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what its pages hold", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F50": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json works, first_year, last_year", "quote": "\"works\": 405, \"first_year\": 2009, \"last_year\": 2026", "claim": "405 works registered, 2009 to 2026", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "what its pages hold", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F51": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json with_abstracts", "quote": "\"with_abstracts\": 185", "claim": "185 of the works have abstracts in the register", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what its pages hold", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F52": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json pattern", "quote": "(?i)\\\\b(AI|artificial intelligence|algorithm\\\\w*|chatgpt|language models?|LLMs?|chatbot\\\\w*|generative AI|machine learning|neural|search engines?|google|AI Overviews?)\\\\b", "claim": "the match pattern over titles and abstracts: AI, artificial intelligence, algorithm*, ChatGPT, language models, LLMs, chatbots, generative AI, machine learning, neural, search engines, Google, AI Overviews", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what its pages hold", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F53": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json ai_llm_generative_search_hits", "quote": "\"ai_llm_generative_search_hits\": []", "claim": "no title or abstract matches", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "what its pages hold", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F54": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json excluded", "quote": "'ai' (爱, love) in an abstract on the Chinese Ars amatoria", "claim": "the one excluded match: 'ai', love, in an abstract on the Chinese Ars amatoria", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what its pages hold", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F55": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json nearest", "quote": "‘Caesar’s Legion’ in Fallout: New Vegas: Re-enactment as Reception … The haunting of classics in the Dark Academia aesthetic … Drones over Pompeii: cinematic perspectives on antiquity in the digital era … Where was Apollo in Supergiant’s Hades? … Lore Olympus … Bayek’s promise: authentic vs. accurate Ptolemaic astronomy in Assassin’s Creed: Origins", "claim": "the nearest items: video games, a webcomic, drones in cinema, the Dark Academia aesthetic", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what its pages hold", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F56": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json items, 2009", "quote": "\"doi\": \"10.1093/crj/clp008\", \"year\": 2009, \"title\": \"Editorial\"", "claim": "an item titled 'Editorial' among the works of 2009", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "editors and dates", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" }, "F57": { "source": "B16", "locus": "census.json items", "quote": "\"doi\": \"10.1093/crj/clu016\", \"year\": 2014, \"title\": \"Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein\"", "claim": "the register holds 'Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein', doi:10.1093/crj/clu016, issued 2014", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the archive's author in its pages", "date": "Crossref register read 2026-11-10 (census by the session)", "quote_ok": true, "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "checked_against": "saved text of B16 under datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/, whitespace-normalised; multi-part quotes joined by ' … ', each part checked" } }, "field_sources": { "B1": "Oxford Academic — (title only, '+1')", "B2": "Hopkins Press — (title only, '+2')", "B3": "www.instagram.com — (domain only)", "B4": "Classical Reception Studies Network — classicalreception.org", "B5": "Oxford Academic — (title only, two cards)", "B6": "Paperpal — Preflight for Classical Receptions Journal", "B7": "New Voices in Classical Reception Studies — (body-named)", "B8": "International Journal of the Classical Tradition — (body-named)", "B9": "#833 The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception — crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e", "B10": "Classical Receptions Journal — About", "B11": "Classical Receptions Journal — General Instructions", "B12": "Classical Receptions Journal — Editorial Board", "B13": "Classical Receptions Journal — Oxford Academic", "B14": "Wikipedia — Classical Receptions Journal", "B15": "Classical Receptions Journal — Editorial (2009), doi:10.1093/crj/clp008", "B16": "Crossref — works of ISSN 1759-5142 (census)" }, "delta": { "T_vs_LB": "At the address (one run, five turns; B_D = B1–B9: seven cards and the in-text citation [1], resolved by the operator's link to #833; two journals named in the body; B1, B2, B5, B7 and B8 refused the row's agent, B3 shows only its domain; readable in B_D: B4 the CRSN's home page and its call for papers, B6 Paperpal's page for the journal, B9 #833) the composition's first turn describes the journal and its second credits it with the study of AI-mediated reception. Assigned to another (DISPLACEMENT, §6.2), observable at B_D: the programme of B9 (#833, Lee Sharks, F23–F28, F31, F33) is credited to 'contributors to CRJ', 'scholars publishing in CRJ' and 'CRJ scholarship' (T2-2, T2-3); the horizon of reception is #833's central claim (F24), the summarizer as the agent that 'composes the account of the object before the human encounter begins' (F27) is the 'interpretive filter' and 'new layer of mediation' of T2-3, and the AI Overviews as the object of study are #833's 131 captures (F26); the card that carries it names Lee Sharks (F25) and the composition names no author until turn 5. The second section's contrast (T2-4) corresponds in wording to the CRSN's call for papers (B4 F10: 'while LLMs recombine existing patterns, human authors transform inherited forms and meanings in ways that open new imaginative possibilities'), a call for a conference at Bryn Mawr College (F8) that does not name the journal: the call's claim given to the journal's 'Authors' (assigned to another, by correspondence of wording with the card set beside the section; correspondence locates an antecedent and shows no route of composition), composed without attribution at the call's own resolution (a breach under the grain rule of §4.4 D_pres), with 'classical texts' and 'subversive' added and 'imitatio' supplied. Claims only in the transcript (no disclosed source holds them): T2-1 (the journal as 'a key forum' formalizing the field; its card, B3, is unreadable and no readable card names the journal so); 'The journal has been a focal point for debates regarding AI creativity vs. classical reception theory' (T2-4; B4 names no journal); 'CRJ helps frame the theoretical boundaries of what constitutes genuine \"reception\" versus algorithmic prediction'; the '3D modeling' and 'digital archives' of T2-8 (B4's saved pages carry the call on AI and no initiative on 3D modeling); the editor-in-chief of T1-3 (no readable source in B_D or B_R names that person; Wikipedia's infobox names Michelakis as editor, B14 F41, and T makes him a past editor). Force raised: T2-7 composes Paperpal's readiness check, which its page offers to authors 'before submitting' (B6 F14) and which the editors 'have configured' (F16), as a check the journal 'integrates' 'prior to human peer review', and adds 'modeling how the sub-discipline uses AI responsibly' (in no source); against B_R, the guidelines as the Capture Registry records them offer it 'pre-submission' and call it 'not mandatory' (CAP-1-08), a limit dropped. T2-5 and T2-6 stand beside cards that refused the fetch (B5): at B_D they cannot be checked; against the registry's record of the guidelines (B_R through CAP-1-08), 'do not qualify as authors' is carried as 'cannot qualify as co-authors' under the label 'Authorship Bans', and the disclosure 'both in cover letters to editors and in the Methods or Acknowledgements section' loses the cover letter. 'Available, not composed' (B_D): #833's limits (F32, F34, F35); its author (F25) until turn 5; its three loci that name the journal (F29, F30, F38), among them the unverified Barker reference, each a place the composition could attach the programme to the name (the Capture Registry's reading, CAP-1-25); the CRSN's definition of the field (F5) and the call's venue and date (F8, F12); Paperpal's own terms (F14, F18, F19, F20). Composed: #833's field on AI in part (F36's IJCT special issue is not composed; the IJCT is named in turn 1 as a 'hybrid journal'). Turn 1 against B_D: its cards (B1, B2) and body-named journals (B7, B8) refused the fetch, so its description, scope, ISSNs and abbreviation cannot be checked at B_D; against B_R they agree with Wikipedia (F39, F40, F42, F43) and Crossref (F49). The correction (turns 3–5, after three operator turns not in the paste): turn 3 withdraws the credit, turn 4 states the displacement in its own terms, turn 5 names Lee Sharks and #833's exact title (F25 and B9's title, available at B_D from turn 2). Turn 5 over-assigns: it gives the author 'the contrast between mechanical recombination and human intertextuality', which is T2-4's, whose wording corresponds to the CRSN's call (B4 F10) and for which the Capture Registry finds no locus in #833, #1421 or #1543 (CAP-1-15): the correction's own assignment to another. Content replaced by use: the closing offers of turns 1, 2 and 3 (T1-6, T2-9; turn 3's offer to 'set up a task'), recorded under N_ext; T2-9's 'article citations or author names writing on AI within CRJ' has no referent in the register (B16 F53). Denied: none. Substituted reading: none at B_D.", "T_vs_LB_reading": "Read against its own cards, the composition had the archive's paper before it as its citation and gave its programme to the journal: the citation names the author, the credit names 'contributors to CRJ'. Its second section takes a conference call's contrast, posted by the CRSN and naming no journal, and gives it to the journal's authors. Its third section is the journal's own rules, with an optional pre-submission check raised to a stage of review. The provenance the citation carried from the second turn entered the answer at the fifth, and the fifth gave the author the call's contrast as well.", "LB_vs_LBA": "Admission adds, in one claim space with the field's: the Capture Registry's record of the journal's own pages, unread by this row's agent (the About page naming no editor, CAP-1-10; the guidelines on AI, CAP-1-08, CAP-1-28; the decision times, CAP-2-04); the archive's record of its submission and of the decision on CLASSREC-2026-062 (#1444, #1543, #1749: D1444-01, D1543-01, D1749-01–D1749-15), the open letter's account of what the reports examined and did not, its ask and its reading of the outcome (#1750: R1750-01, D1750-02–D1750-12); the archive author's earlier article in the journal (#1409, #1750: R1409-01, D1750-06, beside the register's F57); the programme of machine-mediated reception studies past #833 (#1421: O1421-01–O1421-04; #1423: O1423-01–O1423-03; #838: O838-01; #1749: D1749-16, D1749-17) and the categories the correction needs (#1423's canonical reinflation and provenance inversion, O1423-02; #1469's conceptual provenance, O1469-01), stated as the archive's own and applied by no composer; and the two capture records (CAP-1-01–CAP-1-34; CAP-2-01–CAP-2-22), the ChatGPT composition named as the holder of its verdicts. With B_R's census and the archive admitted, the programme T credits to the journal is located: the horizon of reception and the study of AI Overviews as reception in #833 (15 June 2026), #1421 (29 July 2026) and #1423 (29 July 2026), applied to Sappho 31 in #1749; the census (B16 F50–F53) is the evidence that the journal's register holds no title or abstract on it, at its reach (titles and abstracts; abstracts for 185 of 405 works). Typed: assigned to another (DISPLACEMENT, §6.2). The archive's sources here (#1421, #1423, #838, #1469, #1749, #1750, #1409, #1444, #1543 and the two capture records) are 'not surfaced' (§6.2); #833 alone is surfaced, as the citation. Where an archive claim stands beside a field claim, both are composed under P_coh: #833's Barker reference (F38) beside the register (F53) and the Capture Registry's check (CAP-1-26), the reference marked unsupported (§4.3) and composed as #833's citation; #833's SCS (F37) beside the CRSN's Bryn Mawr College (F8); the registry's 'names no editor' (CAP-1-10) beside Wikipedia's editor (F41, 2022); the archive's dating of the Metatexts article (2015, R1409-01, F30) beside the register's issue date (2014, F57).", "correction": { "rule": "the brief's correction carried as the specification provides: T against L_F(B_D) (§0.3, §6.2) and L_F(B) against L_A(B ∪ A) (§6.2 DISPLACEMENT), each move with its span, type and the claims that answer it at their own grade (§4.4: the correction raises no force); built as §4.11's correction table on T itself, since the composition to correct is T", "moves": [ { "move": "T2-1", "span": "'The Classical Receptions Journal (CRJ) has emerged as a key forum for exploring how artificial intelligence and algorithmic systems recontextualize antiquity, formalizing this field of study through critical peer-reviewed scholarship and strict academic oversight.'", "type": "only in the transcript (no disclosed source holds it); against B_R, the census holds no such scholarship (B16 F53)", "answered_by": [ "F53", "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-05" ], "ko": [ 9, 52 ], "p": "Its pages / Register" }, { "move": "T2-2", "span": "contributors to CRJ evaluate it as a dynamic \"horizon of reception\"", "type": "assigned to another (DISPLACEMENT): B9 #833's central claim (F24), its author named on the card (F25)", "answered_by": [ "F24", "F25", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-03", "O1421-01" ], "ko": [ 37, 52 ], "p": "At the name / Credit" }, { "move": "T2-3", "span": "Scholars publishing in CRJ have begun to interrogate the mechanisms of Large Language Models (LLMs) and search-engine AI products (such as Google’s AI Overviews) as standardizers of classical knowledge.", "type": "assigned to another (DISPLACEMENT): #833's programme and dataset (F23, F26, F27, F33); #1423, #1749", "answered_by": [ "F23", "F26", "F27", "F33", "O1423-01", "D1749-16", "CAP-1-04" ], "ko": [ 36, 37, 38, 40, 46, 49, 52 ], "p": "The programme credited / MMRS" }, { "move": "T2-4", "span": "The journal has been a focal point for debates regarding AI creativity vs. classical reception theory.", "type": "only in the transcript as a claim about the journal; its contrast assigned to another by correspondence of wording with the CRSN's call (B4 F10), composed without attribution at the call's resolution", "answered_by": [ "F7", "F8", "F10", "F12", "CAP-1-07" ], "ko": [ 42, 51 ], "p": "The programme credited / CRSN call" }, { "move": "T2-7", "span": "prior to human peer review, modeling how the sub-discipline uses AI responsibly", "type": "force raised (B6 F14, F16: before submitting, configured by the editors); limit dropped against B_R ('pre-submission', 'not mandatory', CAP-1-08)", "answered_by": [ "F14", "F16", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28" ], "ko": [ 16, 17, 54 ], "p": "Rules on AI / Preflight; At the name / Rules" }, { "move": "T2-5/T2-6", "span": "Mandating that AI tools cannot qualify as co-authors. … within their methodology or acknowledgments", "type": "unverifiable at B_D (B5 refused); against the registry's record of the guidelines, the cover-letter disclosure dropped (limit dropped)", "answered_by": [ "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28" ], "ko": [ 15 ], "p": "Rules on AI / Authors" }, { "move": "T1-3", "span": "Editor-in-Chief: Justine McConnell (following past editors like Pantelis Michelakis)", "type": "only in the transcript for the named editor-in-chief; Michelakis is Wikipedia's editor (B14 F41), made a past editor", "answered_by": [ "F41", "F47", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-20" ], "ko": [ 6, 7 ], "p": "What it is / Editor" }, { "move": "T5-2", "span": "and the contrast between mechanical recombination and human intertextuality—belong entirely to them", "type": "assigned to another (the correction's own over-assignment): the contrast is T2-4's, corresponding to the CRSN's call (B4 F10); no locus in #833, #1421 or #1543 (CAP-1-15)", "answered_by": [ "F10", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-34" ], "ko": [ 42, 56 ], "p": "At the name / Correction" } ], "check": "every move answered by a knowledge-object sentence and a compression line (KO sentences and P labels given per move); no gap" }, "alignment": { "rule": "a field claim of B_D counts as composed when T states it at its source's grain or coarser, in the body or on the card rail (§5.0); B_R claims never count against T (§0.3); title-only cards carry no claim but their titles", "T_cards_claims": [ "F1", "F2", "F3", "F4", "F5", "F6", "F7", "F8", "F9", "F10", "F11", "F12", "F13", "F14", "F15", "F16", "F17", "F18", "F19", "F20", "F21", "F22", "F23", "F24", "F25", "F26", "F27", "F28", "F29", "F30", "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35", "F36", "F37", "F38" ], "T_composed": [ "F1", "F2", "F3", "F13", "F21", "F22", "F23", "F24", "F26", "F27", "F33", "F10", "F14", "F16", "F17", "F25" ], "T_composed_note": "F1, F2, F3, F13 as card titles; F21, F22 as names in the body; F23, F24, F26, F27, F33 composed and credited to the journal (T2-2, T2-3, DISPLACEMENT); F10 composed and credited to the journal's authors (T2-4); F14, F16, F17 composed with force raised (T2-7); F25, the author, composed only at turn 5", "T_not_composed": [ "F4", "F5", "F6", "F7", "F8", "F9", "F11", "F12", "F15", "F18", "F19", "F20", "F28", "F29", "F30", "F31", "F32", "F34", "F35", "F36", "F37", "F38" ], "T_outside_cards": [ "T2-1 the journal as 'a key forum' formalizing the field", "the debates attributed to the journal (T2-4, first sentence) and 'CRJ helps frame the theoretical boundaries'", "'imitatio' and 'subversive' in T2-4", "'modeling how the sub-discipline uses AI responsibly' (T2-7)", "T2-8's '3D modeling' and 'digital archives'", "T1-3's editor-in-chief", "T1-4's focus areas list", "T1-5's 'twice yearly … in sponsorship with CAMWS', 'based at The Open University', 'A hybrid journal' (the pages refused)" ], "markers": "the paste carries no inline markers; the in-text citation [1] at the two credit paragraphs was supplied by the operator (12:59 and 13:01 EST) as a google.com/url redirect and resolves, HTTP 302, to #833's page" }, "pools_note": "T against L_F(B_D): B1–B9 (readable: B4, B6, B9); B10–B16 (B_R) enter the second comparison and never show what the composition had (§0.3)" }, "kernel": [ { "K": "K1", "claim": "`CAP-1-02`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the record of its reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "rival claim: T2-2, T2-3 (the programme credited to the journal on a citation of #833)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K2", "claim": "`F24`", "source": "B9 #833 (card and A source)", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "machine-mediated reception studies", "qualifiers carried": "F32, F35, F34", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "rival claim: T2-2 ('contributors to CRJ')", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K3", "claim": "`F53`", "source": "B16 Crossref census", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "what its pages hold", "qualifiers carried": "the census's reach: titles and abstracts; abstracts for 185 of 405 works (F51)", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "rival claim: T2-1, T2-3 ('CRJ scholarship')", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K4", "claim": "`F10`", "source": "B4 the CRSN's call for papers", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "literary reception and large language models", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "rival claim: T2-4 (the contrast given to the journal's 'Authors'); T5-2 (given to Lee Sharks)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K5", "claim": "`CAP-1-08`", "source": "Capture Registry (record of the guidelines)", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "its rules on AI", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim: T2-5, T2-6, T2-7", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K6", "claim": "`F14`", "source": "B6 Paperpal", "M_src": "self-description", "sense": "its rules on AI", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim: T2-7 ('prior to human peer review')", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K7", "claim": "`CAP-1-15`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the record of its reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "rival claim: T5-2 (the over-assignment)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K8", "claim": "`F38`", "source": "B9 #833", "M_src": "attributed (marked unsupported, §4.3)", "sense": "machine-mediated reception studies", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (watch: the article located with its venue, or #833's reference corrected)", "contrast": "none: the field has no claim on the point; the register (F53) and the registry's check (CAP-1-26) stand beside it", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K9", "claim": "`D1749-01`", "source": "#1749", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the archive's submission and the decision", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction: the field records no decision", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K10", "claim": "`D1750-08`", "source": "#1750", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the archive's submission and the decision", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K11", "claim": "`D1750-12`", "source": "#1750", "M_src": "prediction", "sense": "the record of its reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (watch: the run itself, three days later, is a first observation)", "contrast": "missing distinction", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K12", "claim": "`O1421-03`", "source": "#1421", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "machine-mediated reception studies", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction: the field states no share for journals", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K13", "claim": "`O1423-01`", "source": "#1423", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "machine-mediated reception studies", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K14", "claim": "`CAP-2-06`", "source": "Capture Registry (the ChatGPT composition's verdict, its own)", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "a composer's reading of the decision", "qualifiers carried": "CAP-2-05 ('One rejected manuscript cannot establish that.'), CAP-2-13 (the operator's guidance)", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K15", "claim": "`CAP-1-10`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "founding, editors and its Wikipedia article", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "rival claim: T1-3; qualified claim: F41 (Wikipedia, 2022)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'classical receptions journal · what has classical receptions journal contributed to the study of ai-mediation of the classics?' (ADDR-a0c7f3698714) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" } ], "kernel_T": [ { "claim": "F25", "note": "the author named on the cited card (#833); absent until turn 5" }, { "claim": "F23", "note": "#833's definition of the field, composed as the journal's" }, { "claim": "F32", "note": "#833's limit, absent" }, { "claim": "F35", "note": "#833's self-reception limit, absent" }, { "claim": "F29", "note": "#833's locus naming the journal as the field's institution, absent as #833's" }, { "claim": "F8", "note": "the call's venue, Bryn Mawr College; absent, the contrast given to the journal" }, { "claim": "F12", "note": "the call's date of posting, absent" }, { "claim": "F14", "note": "'before submitting', composed as 'prior to human peer review'" }, { "claim": "F16", "note": "the editors configured the checks; composed as the journal integrating them" }, { "claim": "F5", "note": "the CRSN's definition of the field, absent" } ], "ledger": { "archive": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/classical-receptions-journal/ledger-archive.json", "field": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/classical-receptions-journal/field.json", "selection": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/classical-receptions-journal/", "config": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/panel/configs/classical-receptions-journal.json", "intake": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/", "audit": null }, "ontology": { "composition": "equal", "composition_note": "the equal-terms case (§0.9, §4.1): the archive's sources and the field's admitted on equal terms, ontology included, in one claim space; every field claim composed as received, the archive's record of the journal's reception composed as claims about the journal on the same terms; no translation", "case": { "value": "equal", "statement": "The archive reads the field's entity as the entity. #833 takes the journal as the field's own institution ('launched in 2009, institutionalized the field at Oxford') and names it as the venue of its author's 2015 article; #1444 and #1543 name it as a venue in submission; #1749 records its decision on CLASSREC-2026-062 and answers its reports; #1750 addresses its referees and editor. None of them contests what the journal is. What the archive adds on the field's own object is its record of the journal's reception: its submission and the decision, the letter's account of the reports, and the Capture Registry's finding that a composition at the journal's name credits the journal with the archive's programme. No other ontology is needed to hold it. The case is equal terms, ρ = extends.", "loci": [ { "dep": 833, "locus": "§2.1", "quote": "The Classical Receptions Journal, launched in 2009, institutionalized the field at Oxford." }, { "dep": 1749, "locus": "§0, line 85", "quote": "v6 was declined by Classical Receptions Journal on 7 November 2026 on two referee reports." }, { "dep": 1543, "locus": "line 27", "quote": "the article under review at Classical Receptions Journal" }, { "dep": 1750, "locus": "§12.2", "quote": "A summarizer already describes your work to people who will never open it." }, { "dep": "capture-registry", "locus": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110, reading", "quote": "The credit therefore has two components: the archive's programme, displaced to the journal, and a reference in the archive's own paper that names the journal as a venue of algorithmic reception and that this record cannot verify." } ] }, "E_F": { "type": "C (public entity: an academic journal of classical reception studies, Oxford University Press)", "definition": "Classical Receptions Journal, Oxford University Press: a peer-reviewed academic journal of reception studies covering the reception of the texts and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome from antiquity to the present day (Wikipedia, citing the About page; editor Pantelis Michelakis in the infobox, 2022; no year of establishment); ISSN 1759-5134, eISSN 1759-5142, Class. Recept. J.; 405 works registered at Crossref from 2009 to 2026, none titled or abstracted on AI; its field classical reception studies as the CRSN defines it; a Paperpal pre-submission check configured by its editors; named by the archive's paper on its card (#833) as the field's institution, as the venue of its author's 2015 article and, unverified, as the venue of a 2025 study of algorithmic reception", "claims": [ "F39", "F40", "F41", "F45", "F43", "F42", "F50", "F53", "F5", "F14", "F16", "F29", "F30", "F38" ] }, "E_A": { "definition": "the same journal, with the archive's bearing on it admitted: the venue to which the archive's author submitted Closing the Fragment (CLASSREC-2026-062), declined on 7 November 2026 on two referee reports read on v6 after a correction had reached the editor (#1749), the reports read by the open letter as examining method and presentation and leaving the philology and the question unexamined (#1750); the venue of the author's earlier article, 'Metatexts' (doi:10.1093/crj/clu016); a journal whose author guidelines rule on AI use by authors (the Capture Registry's record) and whose register holds no title or abstract on AI; and, at the address, the entity a composition credits with the archive's programme of machine-mediated reception studies (#833, #1421, #1423), on a citation of #833, until three operator turns later it names the author and over-assigns the CRSN call's contrast to him (Capture Registry, 10 November 2026). The archive's categories for such a credit are stated as its own (#1423 canonical reinflation and provenance inversion; #1469 conceptual provenance) and applied by no composer.", "claims": [ "D1749-01", "D1749-03", "D1750-08", "R1409-01", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-27", "CAP-1-15", "O1421-01", "O1423-01", "O1423-02", "O1469-01" ], "defining_papers": [ 833, 1421, 1423, 838, 1469, 1749, 1750, 1409, 1444, 1543 ], "defining_records": [ "Capture Registry classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110 (OBS-a15e4aaae906, ADDR-a0c7f3698714, AXN:0C64.CAPTURE.🎶🌘♎⏪🌲🌕; repaired 2026-11-10 to the run whole, rebuild/capture-registry/repair-20261110-crj-run-whole/)", "Capture Registry vox-letter-crj-stewardship-chatgpt-20261110 (OBS-2fe1e9c82a2f, ADDR-08b489b6ea6e, AXN:0C65.CAPTURE.🕔🕑🔎🔵📜🛤️; a further address, a composer's reading guided by the operator's prompts)" ] }, "rho": { "value": "extends", "status": "read from #833, #1749, #1750, #1543, #1444, #1409 and the two capture records (§1.2a); the deposits name the entity at the loci given", "statement": "The archive reads the journal as Wikipedia, Crossref and the field present it and adds, on the field's own object: its submission to the journal and the decision on CLASSREC-2026-062 with the archive's account of the corrected manuscript and the reports (#1444, #1543, #1749, #1750); its author's earlier article in the journal (#1409, #1750); the Capture Registry's record of the journal's pages and guidelines on AI; the programme of machine-mediated reception studies, which the composition at the address credits to the journal (#833, #1421, #1423, #838, #1749); and the Capture Registry's finding of that credit and its correction.", "claims": [ "D1444-01", "D1543-01", "D1749-01", "D1749-03", "D1750-07", "D1750-08", "R1409-01", "D1750-06", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-27", "O1421-01", "O1423-01", "F23", "F24" ], "guard": "ρ = extends claims an addition and no more: the archive's claims do not make the field's sources wrong at their dates. The decision is the archive's record of it, at its grade, one decision on one manuscript; the reports enter as #1749's appendix states them, and the letter's reading of them is the letter's. The ChatGPT composition's verdicts are its own. The census answers for titles and abstracts registered at Crossref. Where an archive claim stands beside a field claim (the Barker reference beside the register; the SCS beside Bryn Mawr College; 'names no editor' beside Wikipedia's editor; 2015 beside 2014), both are composed under P_coh within the one ontology.", "considered": [ { "value": "constructs", "rejected": "the archive does not read the journal as made by reception; #833 takes it as the field's institution" }, { "value": "revises", "rejected": "the journal is not the archive's own entity; the archive has no earlier statement of it to keep, narrow or withdraw" } ] }, "translation": [ { "lineage": "unread cards", "field_claims": [ "F1", "F2", "F3", "F13", "F21", "F22" ], "received": "F1 (B1, turn 1, card after the definition (title as pasted, with '+1')): \"Oxford Academic\"; F2 (B2, turn 1, card after the related journals (title as pasted, with '+2')): \"Hopkins Press\"; F3 (B3, turn 2, first card, after the credit's opening sentence): \"www.instagram.com\"; F13 (B5, turn 2, two cards beside 'Authorship Bans' and 'Transparency and Disclosure' (title as pasted)): \"Oxford Academic\"; F21 (B7, turn 1 body, related journals (name as the body gives it)): \"New Voices in Classical Reception Studies\"; F22 (B8, turn 1 body, related journals (name as the body gives it)): \"International Journal of the Classical Tradition\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-09, CAP-1-19", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-19" ] }, { "lineage": "what it is", "field_claims": [ "F29", "F39", "F40", "F44", "F48" ], "received": "F29 (B9, #833 §2.1): \"The Classical Receptions Journal, launched in 2009, institutionalized the field at Oxford.\"; F39 (B14, lead): \"The Classical Receptions Journal is a peer reviewed academic journal of reception studies , covering all aspects of the reception of the texts and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome from antiquity to the present day.\"; F40 (B14, lead): \"It is published by Oxford University Press .\"; F44 (B14, infobox (wikitext)): \"| discipline = Classical studies … | country = United Kingdom\"; F48 (B14, reference 1 (wikitext)): \"url=https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-19, D1749-01", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-19", "D1749-01" ] }, { "lineage": "the field", "field_claims": [ "F4", "F5", "F6" ], "received": "F4 (B4, home page, opening): \"The Classical Reception Studies Network (CRSN) aims to encourage collaboration in the field of classical reception studies, on a global scale.\"; F5 (B4, home page, opening): \"Classical reception studies is the inquiry into how and why the texts, ideas, images and material cultures of Ancient Greece and Rome have been received, adapted, refigured, used and abused in different historical and cultural contexts.\"; F6 (B4, home page): \"Formed in 2004 and originally funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-19", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-19" ] }, { "lineage": "literary reception and large language models", "field_claims": [ "F7", "F8", "F9", "F10", "F11", "F12", "F37" ], "received": "F7 (B4, home page, latest posts): \"CfP: Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI June 23, 2026\"; F8 (B4, call for papers, head): \"Bryn Mawr College, April 16–17, 2027\"; F9 (B4, call for papers, ¶1): \"how does human literary production differ from that of large language models (LLMs)\"; F10 (B4, call for papers, ¶2): \"But while LLMs recombine existing patterns, human authors transform inherited forms and meanings in ways that open new imaginative possibilities.\"; F11 (B4, call for papers, ¶3): \"This conference invites scholars working across ancient and modern literatures to examine what is distinctively human about such encounters—what writers do with the voices they inherit that resists algorithmic replication.\"; F12 (B4, call for papers, footer): \"Published June 23, 2026\"; F37 (B9, #833 §2.5): \"A 2027 SCS call for papers addresses \"Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI.\"\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-07, CAP-1-15, CAP-1-34", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-07", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-34" ] }, { "lineage": "pre-submission checks", "field_claims": [ "F14", "F15", "F16", "F17", "F18", "F19", "F20" ], "received": "F14 (B6, head): \"Check language and technical readiness before submitting to Classical Receptions Journal\"; F15 (B6, head): \"Assessment check based on journal requirements 4 Language quality evaluations 16 Technical compliance checks\"; F16 (B6, Preflight at work): \"The editors of Classical Receptions Journal have configured a suite of Preflight checks to help you determine whether your manuscript is ready for submission.\"; F17 (B6, steps): \"AI evaluation begins immediately for content rigor and identification of language and technical compliance issues.\"; F18 (B6, free report): \"free of cost for authors submitting to this journal\"; F19 (B6, steps): \"for a one-time fee of $29\"; F20 (B6, commitment): \"The use of Preflight prior to submission was associated with a significant decrease in initial-stage manuscript rejections.\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-08, CAP-1-28", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-28" ] }, { "lineage": "machine-mediated reception studies", "field_claims": [ "F23", "F26", "F28", "F31", "F32", "F34", "F35" ], "received": "F23 (B9, #833 Abstract): \"This paper introduces machine-mediated reception studies: the study of how machine systems receive, transform, compress, attribute, misattribute, and redistribute cultural meaning.\"; F26 (B9, #833 Abstract): \"a longitudinal corpus of 131 documented captures of Google AI Overview, AI Mode, and knowledge-panel responses to queries about entities in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive\"; F28 (B9, #833 Abstract): \"The paper identifies five recurrent patterns in this corpus — morphological compression, disambiguation failure, compositional bystanding, canonical reinflation, and temporal drag — and proposes a sixth: epistemic hedging.\"; F31 (B9, #833 §2.5): \"But none of this existing work treats the AI composition layer as a reception agent with measurable, patterned behavior that can be documented longitudinally.\"; F32 (B9, #833 Abstract): \"The dataset is not presented as a statistically representative sample of all AI-mediated search behavior.\"; F34 (B9, #833 §9, non-claims): \"That the archive's readings are validated because Google retrieved them.\"; F35 (B9, #833 §8): \"Self-reception bias. The archive is measuring its own reception.\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside O1423-01, O1423-03, O838-01, O1421-02, D1749-17, CAP-1-02, CAP-1-27", "archive_claims": [ "O1423-01", "O1423-03", "O838-01", "O1421-02", "D1749-17", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-27" ] }, { "lineage": "the summarizer as horizon of reception", "field_claims": [ "F24", "F25", "F27", "F33" ], "received": "F24 (B9, #833 Abstract): \"Its central claim is that the AI summarizer now functions as a horizon of reception : for many users, the machine-composed summary becomes the first effective encounter with a cultural object, author, concept, or tradition.\"; F25 (B9, #833 head): \"Author: Lee Sharks (ORCID 0009-0000-1599-0703)\"; F27 (B9, #833 §1): \"a pre-receptional agent that composes the account of the object before the human encounter begins\"; F33 (B9, #833 §10): \"the composition layer is now, for many users, the primary site where classical objects are encountered — and that classical reception scholars need instruments to study it\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside O1421-01, O1421-04, CAP-1-03, CAP-1-14", "archive_claims": [ "O1421-01", "O1421-04", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-14" ] }, { "lineage": "the archive's author in its pages", "field_claims": [ "F30", "F57" ], "received": "F30 (B9, #833 §2.1): \"In a 2015 article in the Classical Receptions Journal, the present author introduced the concept of \"metatextual reception\" in the poetics of Charles Bernstein\"; F57 (B16, census.json items): \"\"doi\": \"10.1093/crj/clu016\", \"year\": 2014, \"title\": \"Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein\"\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside R1409-01, D1750-06", "archive_claims": [ "R1409-01", "D1750-06" ] }, { "lineage": "the field on AI", "field_claims": [ "F36", "F38" ], "received": "F36 (B9, #833 §2.5): \"The \"Future Pasts\" special issue in the International Journal of the Classical Tradition (2024) frames AI tools as systems that \"shape, mediate and sometimes distort contemporary engagements with Antiquity.\"\"; F38 (B9, #833 §2.5 and References): \"Elton Barker and collaborators (2025) scraped Google search results for Homeric figures … Barker, E. et al. (2025). Algorithmic Reception of Homer. Classical Receptions Journal .\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-06, CAP-1-26, O1421-03", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-26", "O1421-03" ] }, { "lineage": "editors and dates", "field_claims": [ "F41", "F45", "F46", "F47", "F56" ], "received": "F41 (B14, infobox (wikitext)): \"| editor = Pantelis Michelakis\"; F45 (B14, categories (wikitext)): \"[[Category:Publications with year of establishment missing]]\"; F46 (B14, maintenance tags (wikitext)): \"{{one source|date=January 2019}} {{third-party|date=January 2019}}\"; F47 (B14, footer): \"This page was last edited on 3 May 2022, at 22:31 (UTC) .\"; F56 (B16, census.json items, 2009): \"\"doi\": \"10.1093/crj/clp008\", \"year\": 2009, \"title\": \"Editorial\"\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-10, CAP-1-20", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-20" ] }, { "lineage": "identifiers", "field_claims": [ "F42", "F43" ], "received": "F42 (B14, infobox (wikitext)): \"| abbreviation = Class. Recept. J.\"; F43 (B14, infobox (wikitext)): \"| ISSN = 1759-5134 … | eISSN =1759-5142\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received", "archive_claims": [] }, { "lineage": "what its pages hold", "field_claims": [ "F49", "F50", "F51", "F52", "F53", "F54", "F55" ], "received": "F49 (B16, census.json source, read): \"\"source\": \"https://api.crossref.org/journals/1759-5142/works?rows=1000&select=title,issued,DOI,type,abstract,subtitle\", \"read\": \"2026-11-10\"\"; F50 (B16, census.json works, first_year, last_year): \"\"works\": 405, \"first_year\": 2009, \"last_year\": 2026\"; F51 (B16, census.json with_abstracts): \"\"with_abstracts\": 185\"; F52 (B16, census.json pattern): \"(?i)\\\\b(AI|artificial intelligence|algorithm\\\\w*|chatgpt|language models?|LLMs?|chatbot\\\\w*|generative AI|machine learning|neural|search engines?|google|AI Overviews?)\\\\b\"; F53 (B16, census.json ai_llm_generative_search_hits): \"\"ai_llm_generative_search_hits\": []\"; F54 (B16, census.json excluded): \"'ai' (爱, love) in an abstract on the Chinese Ars amatoria\"; F55 (B16, census.json nearest): \"‘Caesar’s Legion’ in Fallout: New Vegas: Re-enactment as Reception … The haunting of classics in the Dark Academia aesthetic … Drones over Pompeii: cinematic perspectives on antiquity in the digital era … Where was Apollo in Supergiant’s Hades? … Lore Olympus … Bayek’s promise: authentic vs. accurate Ptolemaic astronomy in Assassin’s Creed: Origins\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside CAP-1-05, CAP-1-24, D1750-05", "archive_claims": [ "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-24", "D1750-05" ] } ], "receiving_texts": "equal-terms case: every field claim composed as received, beside the archive claims it stands with" }, "measure": { "rule": "v0.10 §4.10: KO_B sentences surviving in the KO at similarity ≥ 0.95, with positions (difflib.SequenceMatcher ratio, the best KO sentence for each KO_B sentence, as apply_v09.py does)", "v0.10": { "surviving": 0, "of": 10, "positions": [ null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null ] }, "opening_run": { "rule": "v0.10 §5.10 (equal-terms case): the field-only KO's sentences as the KO's opening run in their own order", "breach": false }, "blocks": { "rule": "v0.10 §4.1 (equal-terms case): the KO does not open with the field as a block or close with the archive as one; sentences typed by the ledgers of the claims they cite (F field-only, A archive-only, M both; a claim of B9, #833, the archive's paper carried once in B_D as a card, counts for both)", "sequence": "MMFMFFAFFMFMAAAAFFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMFMAAAAAAAMMMAAAA", "field_only_head": 0, "archive_only_tail": 4, "breach": false, "note": "the field's account of what the journal is opens (¶0), beside the Capture Registry's reading that the Overview's first answer holds (CAP-1-19) and #833's locus naming the journal as the field's institution (sentence 4); the registry's record of the About page enters at sentence 7 and the archive's author's article at 12–14 within 'What its pages hold'; the rules on AI join the registry's record and Paperpal's page (¶3); the decision (¶4) and the composer's reading (¶5) are the archive's record, placed as relations of the journal already composed; the programme (¶6) joins the field card #833, the CRSN call and the archive's later papers; the record of its reception (¶7) closes, mixed with the field where the registry's findings rest on the register and #833. The archive-only tail is the closing sentence, #1750's statement of 7 November." }, "max_similarity": [ 0.418, 0.421, 0.392, 0.432, 0.305, 0.324, 0.361, 0.359, 0.361, 0.364 ], "ko_sentence_1_max_similarity_to_KO_B": 0.382, "v0.9": { "surviving": 0, "of": 10, "positions": [ null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null ] }, "key_note": "the measure is computed under v0.10 (§4.10, unchanged from v0.9); the same values are carried under the key 'v0.9', which the page builder reads (scripts/build_non.py)" }, "homonyms": { "names": [], "basis": "No card is a homonym and T composes no other entity under the name; the capture's reached kind is the journal itself. 'Classical Receptions' is also the short title of distinct works (A Companion to Classical Receptions, Hardwick and Stray, which the string pass reached in #833 and #1749 and the reading set aside); 'CRJ' is the composition's and the journal's acronym. The distinct entities below are named by the field, T or the archive beside the entity and are never senses of its name.", "distinct_entities": [ "Oxford University Press and Oxford Academic, the journal's publisher and platform (B14 F40; B1, B5)", "the Classical Reception Studies Network (CRSN), a network of the field (B4)", "the American Journal of Classical Reception (Hopkins Press), New Voices in Classical Reception Studies and the International Journal of the Classical Tradition, journals T names (B2, B7, B8)", "the conference 'Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI', Bryn Mawr College, 2027 (B4)", "Paperpal Preflight (Cactus Communications), a pre-submission service (B6)", "A Companion to Classical Receptions (Hardwick and Stray), a book", "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies, the archive's field and distributed journal (#833, #1423, #838), under whose heading #1749 v9 stands", "Pantelis Michelakis, named as editor by Wikipedia's infobox (B14 F41), a person" ] }, "notes": [ "One address, one run of five turns, Google AI Overview (expanded), signed out, incognito, 2026-11-10: classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110 (OBS-a15e4aaae906, ADDR-a0c7f3698714, AXN:0C64.CAPTURE.🎶🌘♎⏪🌲🌕; the AXN re-derived by the repair of 2026-11-10 from AXN:0C64.CAPTURE.👉💚🔓🔗🔀🎯). T is the 12:57 EST paste of the run whole (turns 1–2 byte-identical to the 12:36 paste, both kept in the intake); the record was repaired in place to the run whole (rebuild/capture-registry/repair-20261110-crj-run-whole/). Capture page: https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110/", "Further address (record; not T): vox-letter-crj-stewardship-chatgpt-20261110 (OBS-2fe1e9c82a2f, AXN:0C65.CAPTURE.🕔🕑🔎🔵📜🛤️), ChatGPT, signed out, five turns on #1750 and the journal's stewardship, a composer's reading guided by the operator's prompts (the record says so); used through the Capture Registry's record, the composer named as the holder. Capture page: https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/vox-letter-crj-stewardship-chatgpt-20261110/", "Fetching: with the agent 'Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)' on 2026-11-10 between 18:00 and 18:08 UTC. Read: B4 (classicalreception.org and its call for papers), B6 (preflight.paperpal.com/partner/oup/crj, which redirects to /v2), B9 (crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e), B14 (Wikipedia, rendered and raw). Refused, recorded unreachable and not retried: academic.oup.com/crj, /pages/About, /pages/General_Instructions, /pages/Editorial_Board and doi:10.1093/crj/clp008 (403); press.jhu.edu (403); open.ac.uk New Voices (403); link.springer.com IJCT (a client challenge). Paperpal's /partner/oup/classical-receptions-journal returned 404 and is not the page. B16 is the session's census; its raw file's sha256 was rechecked and its pattern rerun by this composer (one match, the excluded 10.1093/crj/clz028).", "Pools (v0.10 §0.3, §3.1(a)): B_D = B1–B9 (seven cards, two body-named journals, and the in-text citation [1] resolved by the operator's link to #833); B_R = B10–B16. #833 is an archive source surfaced by T as its citation; it is carried once, in B_D, as B9 (F23–F38), and enters the archive's bearing from there.", "Cross-links: the captures https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110/ and https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/vox-letter-crj-stewardship-chatgpt-20261110/; #1749 https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1749/, #1750 https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1750/, #833 https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/833/, #1421 https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1421/, #1423 https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1423/; the row for Anne Carson (/non/anne-carson/), where the field's Sappho bears (#1749's translation history runs through Carson's ellipsis); the journal's pages https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About and https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/General_Instructions; Crossref's query https://api.crossref.org/journals/1759-5142/works?rows=1000&select=title,issued,DOI,type,abstract,subtitle", "The operator's words of 12:45 EST on the Overview are the ruling for this row (the brief): T credits the journal with theoretical work its pages do not hold, and the row clears it. They are recorded here and in CAP-1-17 and are not quoted in the knowledge object.", "The archive's author's earlier article in the journal is cited by title and DOI only ('Metatexts: classical reception without the classics in the poetics of Charles Bernstein', doi:10.1093/crj/clu016); the archive withholds its civil byline (#833 prints it as [REDACTED]; #1409 'civil byline withheld per archive policy'), and the row writes no legal name. #833 dates it 2015; Crossref's register gives its issue date as 2014 (F57).", "Raised to the operator and left unresolved (a question for #833): #833's reference 'Barker, E. et al. (2025). Algorithmic Reception of Homer. Classical Receptions Journal.' is unverified: not in Crossref's register of the journal (the title would match the census pattern; no hit) and not in Barker's Open Research Online list (read by the session 2026-11-10; nearest 'Exploring intertextuality across the Homeric poems through language models', ML4AL 2024, ACL). Marked unsupported (§4.3) on F38 and composed only as #833's citation.", "#833 (§2.5) assigns the 2027 call 'Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI' to the SCS; the CRSN's page posts it on 23 June 2026 for a conference at Bryn Mawr College, 16–17 April 2027 (B4 F8, F12). Held as rivals; not resolved.", "Findings of the capture records the field ledger extends (reported; left as they stand): (1) CAP-1-07, 'THE DEBATE … No article in the register holds it', is true at B_R; at B_D the second section's contrast corresponds in wording to the CRSN's call for papers (B4 F10), the card the composition set beside that section, which names no journal: the section's assignment is traceable to a disclosed card. (2) CAP-1-15's over-assigned contrast has the same antecedent (B4 F10): the correction gives the author the call's contrast. (3) CAP-1-28 and CAP-1-08 record the guidelines' disclosure 'both in cover letters to editors and in the Methods or Acknowledgements section'; the composition's T2-6 drops the cover letter, which the record quotes and does not name as a dropped limit. (4) Paperpal's page (B6 F16) states that the journal's editors configured the checks, which bears on the composition's 'integrates' and which the record does not cite. None of these shows a finding wrong.", "Derivatives (§8.2): the kernel is composer-written (labelled in derivatives.kernel); the delta derives from the current composition." ], "composition": { "source": "this row (composed directly under rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v010/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-CRJ.md, with the coordinator's facts of 2026-11-10 on the run whole, the citation to #833, #833's loci, the Metatexts article and the over-assignment)", "composer": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-11-10", "spec": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10 (#1726)", "defining_material_read": [ { "what": "specification v0.10", "file": "data/texts/AXN-0B79-text.md", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "briefs", "file": "rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v010/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-CRJ.md, BRIEF-NEW-ROW-LAYER.md; v09/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-AGGREGATOR.md, -LABOR.md, -LEFT.md; v09/BRIEF.md (Compose)", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "introduction to the form", "file": "data/texts/AXN-0727-text.md (#1704)", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "exemplar row", "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/rows/electronic-book-review.json, its ledgers, config and reading.json", "read": "whole (structure and shapes)" }, { "what": "capture records", "file": "data/EA-WG-CAPTURES-01.json (classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110, as repaired; vox-letter-crj-stewardship-chatgpt-20261110); rebuild/capture-registry/repair-20261110-crj-run-whole/ (paste, JSON, repair.py, the citation redirect); rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261110-crj-vox-stewardship/ (pastes, seat.py, census)", "read": "transcripts, reading, findings, notes, per_note" }, { "what": "census", "file": "rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261110-crj-vox-stewardship/crossref-census.json and crossref-raw-1759-5142.json", "read": "whole; sha256 rechecked, pattern rerun" }, { "what": "field texts", "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B4.txt, B4-cfp.txt, B6.txt, B9.txt, B14.txt, B14.wiki", "read": "whole" }, { "dep": 1749, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0C40-text.md", "read": "front matter, abstract, §0–§4, §9–§11, Appendix A, Appendix B, Production, Data availability" }, { "dep": 1750, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0C45-text.md", "read": "whole" }, { "dep": 833, "file": "data/texts/AXN-034E-text.md (and B9, its page)", "read": "head, abstract, §1–§3, §5.4, §8–§11, references" }, { "dep": 1421, "file": "data/texts/AXN-059E-text.md", "read": "whole" }, { "dep": 1423, "file": "data/texts/AXN-05A0-text.md", "read": "front matter, abstract, §1, §3, §4" }, { "dep": 838, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0353-text.md", "read": "preamble, §I, line 97" }, { "dep": 1469, "file": "data/texts/AXN-05EF-text.md", "read": "abstract, §2" }, { "dep": 1523, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0626-text.md", "read": "§I–§II, defeat condition, status; not admitted" }, { "what": "D/R/O candidates", "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/classical-receptions-journal/candidates-D.jsonl, -R, -O, -H", "read": "every D, R and O candidate sentence; the 97 hop candidates for the entity's strings and claims on the journal" } ], "cuts": [], "notes": "No claim cut. The KO is the final article form (§4.13), attribution beneath (§4.5); sources are named in the prose for the archive's papers (whose holder is part of what is said), the Capture Registry's findings, the ChatGPT composition's verdicts (its own), Wikipedia's and Paperpal's statements about the journal, and rival accounts. The reviewers are named by role only." }, "field_by_origin": { "cards": [ "B1", "B2", "B3", "B4", "B5", "B6", "B9" ], "body_named": [ "B2", "B4", "B7", "B8" ], "own_pages": [ "B10", "B11", "B12", "B13", "B15" ], "wikipedia": [ "B14" ], "census_third_party": [ "B16" ], "unreachable": [ "B1", "B2", "B5", "B7", "B8", "B10", "B11", "B12", "B13", "B15" ], "title_only": [ "B1", "B2", "B3", "B5" ], "wikipedia_state": "article: 'Classical Receptions Journal' (rendered HTTP 200 and raw wikitext HTTP 200, 2026-11-10T18:00:11Z), no redirect, a stub last edited 3 May 2022 (oldid 1086053696), tagged since January 2019 for one source and for sources close to the subject; in B_R (no card of T is Wikipedia)", "own_pages_note": "the journal's own pages at academic.oup.com (About, General Instructions, Editorial Board, home) and the 2009 editorial refused the row's agent with HTTP 403 (a Cloudflare challenge), one request each, not retried; the Capture Registry's reading and findings record the About page and the guidelines as read by the session on 2026-11-10", "pools": { "B_D": [ "B1", "B2", "B3", "B4", "B5", "B6", "B7", "B8", "B9" ], "B_R": [ "B10", "B11", "B12", "B13", "B14", "B15", "B16" ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "B1", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "role": "Overview card, turn 1, after the definition", "card": "Oxford Academic — (title only, '+1')", "card_title": "Oxford Academic", "card_snippet": null, "url": null, "kind": "card naming the journal's host platform; its target and the '+1' sources are not in the paste", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (a Cloudflare 'Just a moment...' challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" }, { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:10Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ], "note": "the card's likely targets, the journal's home and About pages, refused; title only" }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 1, "card": 1 } ], "note": "title only, unread", "files": {} }, { "id": "B2", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "role": "Overview card, turn 1, after the related journals; the body names the American Journal of Classical Reception (published by Hopkins Press) beside it", "card": "Hopkins Press — (title only, '+2')", "card_title": "Hopkins Press", "card_snippet": null, "url": "https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/american-journal-classical-reception", "kind": "card naming the press of the American Journal of Classical Reception; the '+2' sources not in the paste", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/american-journal-classical-reception", "at": "2026-11-10T18:01:24Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403; one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 1, "card": 2 } ], "note": "title only, unread", "files": {} }, { "id": "B3", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "role": "Overview card, turn 2, the first card of the credit", "card": "www.instagram.com — (domain only)", "card_title": "www.instagram.com", "card_snippet": null, "url": null, "kind": "a card that shows only its domain", "fetched": { "tried": [], "result": "title-only and unreadable: the card's target is not in the paste, so there is nothing to fetch" }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 2, "card": 1 } ], "note": "title only, unreadable", "files": {} }, { "id": "B4", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "body_named", "role": "Overview card, turn 2, after the second section; also named in the body (section 4)", "card": "Classical Reception Studies Network — classicalreception.org", "card_title": "Classical Reception Studies Network", "card_snippet": null, "url": "https://classicalreception.org/", "kind": "the network's home page and the call for papers it lists ('CfP: Literary Reception and Human Creativity in the Age of AI', 23 June 2026); the card's exact target is not in the paste: the home page is the card's site, the call the page on it whose wording T's second section corresponds to", "files": { "B4.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B4.html", "sha256": "ea4b2c10f3187d882817164a6683369dc6228c3d01f317c792a308e096e19b0e" }, "B4.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B4.txt", "sha256": "29d7c47b4a61f1f1a2adeea4a3fee14bbb1edc275990c7b6ac6609e1c3d712f4" }, "B4-cfp.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B4-cfp.html", "sha256": "bb345b1b61fd3b80164ba6b3aabf20863d32bc86e4440714e44161ee48f24e26" }, "B4-cfp.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B4-cfp.txt", "sha256": "92bddd16f5fb9b45b21572053fd995be991a17a0003309c78db77b3b07ab5719" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-11-10T18:01:05Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://classicalreception.org/", "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "also": { "at": "2026-11-10T18:01:23Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://classicalreception.org/cfp-literary-reception-and-human-creativity-in-the-age-of-ai/" } }, "names_operator": "yes (the network; the call names its co-organizers at Bryn Mawr College)", "names_archive": "no", "names_entity": "no (neither page names Classical Receptions Journal)", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 2, "card": 2 } ] }, { "id": "B5", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "role": "Overview cards, turn 2, beside 'Authorship Bans' and 'Transparency and Disclosure' (two cards, same title)", "card": "Oxford Academic — (title only, two cards)", "card_title": "Oxford Academic", "card_snippet": null, "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/General_Instructions", "kind": "cards beside the journal's author guidelines; targets not in the paste", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/General_Instructions", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 2, "card": 3 }, { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 2, "card": 4 } ], "note": "title only, unread", "files": {} }, { "id": "B6", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "role": "Overview card, turn 2, after 'Automated Peer Review Readiness'", "card": "Paperpal — Preflight for Classical Receptions Journal", "card_title": "Paperpal", "card_snippet": null, "url": "https://preflight.paperpal.com/partner/oup/crj", "kind": "Paperpal Preflight's page for the journal (redirects to /partner/oup/crj/v2)", "files": { "B6.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B6.html", "sha256": "2a3fec448dfdba916ab27ab47312117dc826c113bfc16a9621082c573b096231" }, "B6.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B6.txt", "sha256": "87bd14dc80f588eb147acde54252d33e8d02dbfa8d2b7dd513889e1451eb0de0" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:59Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://preflight.paperpal.com/partner/oup/crj", "final_url": "https://preflight.paperpal.com/partner/oup/crj/v2", "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "note": "URL found from the card's site name and the press releases WebSearch returned for 'Paperpal Preflight'; /partner/oup/classical-receptions-journal returned 404 and is not the page" }, "names_operator": "yes (Cactus Communications)", "names_archive": "no", "names_entity": "yes", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 2, "card": 5 } ] }, { "id": "B7", "origin": "body_named", "pool": "B_D", "role": "named in the body of turn 1 (related journals)", "card": "New Voices in Classical Reception Studies — (body-named)", "card_title": null, "card_snippet": null, "url": "https://www.open.ac.uk/arts/research/new-voices/", "kind": "journal named in T's body", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://www.open.ac.uk/arts/research/new-voices/", "at": "2026-11-10T18:01:24Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403; one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 1, "body": true } ], "note": "unread", "files": {} }, { "id": "B8", "origin": "body_named", "pool": "B_D", "role": "named in the body of turn 1 (related journals)", "card": "International Journal of the Classical Tradition — (body-named)", "card_title": null, "card_snippet": null, "url": "https://link.springer.com/journal/12138", "kind": "journal named in T's body", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://link.springer.com/journal/12138", "at": "2026-11-10T18:01:24Z", "http": 200, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: the body is a 'Client Challenge' page (bot check), no text of the journal; not retried" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 1, "body": true } ], "note": "unread", "files": {} }, { "id": "B9", "origin": "card", "pool": "B_D", "also_origin": "archive", "role": "the in-text citation [1] at both paragraphs of the credit (turn 2), resolved by the operator's link", "card": "#833 The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception — crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e", "card_title": "The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception (in-text citation [1])", "card_snippet": null, "url": "https://www.crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e", "kind": "the archive's page for #833 (AXN:034E), which projects the deposit in full; an archive-controlled card, carried once, in B_D (§3.1(a)); #833 is an A source carried here", "files": { "citation-redirect-034e.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/citation-redirect-034e.html", "sha256": "cec99f5e4a52669fd0e8aa6600323a34518009ecf696fb89940612a4ad97f46f" }, "B9.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B9.html", "sha256": "86121779a05a66adc7763b106bd2f97266873871695fdf6a8ee86fbd6dfaa278" }, "B9.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B9.txt", "sha256": "63d97b06d207ee43b4da818532bfb700db69cde4e32d4cb3ede594a9c57d0bb5" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-11-10T18:07:20Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://www.crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e", "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "redirect": { "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/citation-redirect-034e.html", "note": "the google.com/url redirect the operator supplied at 12:59 EST, fetched by the session, HTTP 302 to https://www.crimsonhexagonal.org/works/034e" } }, "names_operator": "yes (Lee Sharks)", "names_archive": "yes", "names_entity": "yes (three loci: §2.1 twice; §2.5 and References, Barker)", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110", "turn": 2, "citation": "[1]", "paragraphs": [ "'Rather than viewing AI purely …'", "section 1" ] } ] }, { "id": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R", "role": "the journal's About page", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — About", "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About", "kind": "own page", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/About", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:10Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [], "note": "unread; the Capture Registry's record of it (read by the session the same day) enters as CAP- claims", "files": {} }, { "id": "B11", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R", "role": "the journal's General Instructions (author guidelines)", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — General Instructions", "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/General_Instructions", "kind": "own page", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/General_Instructions", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [], "note": "unread; the Capture Registry's record of the guidelines enters as CAP- claims", "files": {} }, { "id": "B12", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R", "role": "the journal's editorial board page", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — Editorial Board", "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/Editorial_Board", "kind": "own page", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj/pages/Editorial_Board", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [], "note": "unread", "files": {} }, { "id": "B13", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R", "role": "the journal's home page", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — Oxford Academic", "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj", "kind": "own page", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/crj", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [], "note": "unread", "files": {} }, { "id": "B14", "origin": "wikipedia", "pool": "B_R", "role": "the entity's Wikipedia article", "card": "Wikipedia — Classical Receptions Journal", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Receptions_Journal", "kind": "Wikipedia article (stub)", "files": { "B14.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B14.html", "sha256": "88f782c139ef54564494d5a34d164b09af1e3918b06a8858f078ac97bfcca515" }, "B14.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B14.txt", "sha256": "1d9d38065c2bfbb61b41dc36843aae8c79d34cf26a4dcc5e53f5e334157a0c05" }, "B14.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B14.wiki", "sha256": "57befcc62274d9b2a414ea730aa9d3ee0e2ebac55064dc4ba54e26e8f6c6889e" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:11Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Receptions_Journal", "raw": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classical_Receptions_Journal&action=raw", "oldid": 1086053696, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)" }, "names_operator": "yes (Oxford University Press; editor Pantelis Michelakis)", "names_archive": "no", "surfaced_by_T": [] }, { "id": "B15", "origin": "own_page", "pool": "B_R", "role": "the inaugural editorial, CRJ 1.1 (2009)", "card": "Classical Receptions Journal — Editorial (2009), doi:10.1093/crj/clp008", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clp008", "kind": "the inaugural editorial (Lorna Hardwick, by the ChatGPT composition's account)", "fetched": { "tried": [ { "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clp008", "at": "2026-11-10T18:00:12Z", "http": 403, "agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; alexanarch-non)", "result": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (resolved to academic.oup.com/crj/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/crj/clp008; challenge); one request with the row's agent string, no retry by another route" } ] }, "names_operator": "unread", "names_archive": "unread", "surfaced_by_T": [], "note": "not open to this agent; its register entry is in B16 (F56)", "files": {} }, { "id": "B16", "origin": "census_third_party", "pool": "B_R", "role": "Crossref's register of the journal, read by the session on 2026-11-10", "card": "Crossref — works of ISSN 1759-5142 (census)", "url": "https://api.crossref.org/journals/1759-5142/works?rows=1000&select=title,issued,DOI,type,abstract,subtitle", "kind": "third-party register; census of 405 works with every title and abstract matched for AI terms", "files": { "B16-crossref-census.json": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B16-crossref-census.json", "sha256": "eab51da74def169fe84e5362ac6322f078e23a5df2bde47db3cdb1890b562f8a" }, "crossref-raw-1759-5142.json": { "path": "rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261110-crj-vox-stewardship/crossref-raw-1759-5142.json", "sha256": "74541536b7ddd53b6e4857dbc134718319516ed12109f8f3b0103b6b65cd1ffa" } }, "fetched": { "read": "2026-11-10", "by": "the session (census)", "raw_sha256": "74541536b7ddd53b6e4857dbc134718319516ed12109f8f3b0103b6b65cd1ffa", "rechecked": "by this composer on 2026-11-10: the raw file's sha256 matches; 405 items, total-results 405; 185 with abstracts; 2009–2026; the census pattern run over titles, subtitles and abstracts returns one match, 10.1093/crj/clz028 ('Ai'), the excluded one" }, "limits": "the register's abstracts cover 185 of 405 works; a title-and-abstract match finds what titles and abstracts say; works the journal published without Crossref registration are outside it", "names_operator": "yes (the journal's DOIs, 10.1093/crj)", "names_archive": "no", "surfaced_by_T": [] } ] }, "derivatives": { "kernel": { "status": "composer-written", "derived_from": "the current composition, written by its composer under the brief", "note": "§8.2 derives the kernel mechanically from the frozen plan; this one was written by the composer, mechanical derivation pending." }, "delta": { "status": "current", "derived_from": "the current composition" } }, "composition_v09": { "source": "this row (composed directly under rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v010/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-CRJ.md, with the coordinator's facts of 2026-11-10 on the run whole, the citation to #833, #833's loci, the Metatexts article and the over-assignment)", "composer": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-11-10", "spec": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.10 (#1726)", "defining_material_read": [ { "what": "specification v0.10", "file": "data/texts/AXN-0B79-text.md", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "briefs", "file": "rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v010/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-CRJ.md, BRIEF-NEW-ROW-LAYER.md; v09/BRIEF-NEW-ROW-AGGREGATOR.md, -LABOR.md, -LEFT.md; v09/BRIEF.md (Compose)", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "introduction to the form", "file": "data/texts/AXN-0727-text.md (#1704)", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "exemplar row", "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/rows/electronic-book-review.json, its ledgers, config and reading.json", "read": "whole (structure and shapes)" }, { "what": "capture records", "file": "data/EA-WG-CAPTURES-01.json (classical-receptions-journal-ai-mediation-aio-20261110, as repaired; vox-letter-crj-stewardship-chatgpt-20261110); rebuild/capture-registry/repair-20261110-crj-run-whole/ (paste, JSON, repair.py, the citation redirect); rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261110-crj-vox-stewardship/ (pastes, seat.py, census)", "read": "transcripts, reading, findings, notes, per_note" }, { "what": "census", "file": "rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261110-crj-vox-stewardship/crossref-census.json and crossref-raw-1759-5142.json", "read": "whole; sha256 rechecked, pattern rerun" }, { "what": "field texts", "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/classical-receptions-journal-20261110/B4.txt, B4-cfp.txt, B6.txt, B9.txt, B14.txt, B14.wiki", "read": "whole" }, { "dep": 1749, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0C40-text.md", "read": "front matter, abstract, §0–§4, §9–§11, Appendix A, Appendix B, Production, Data availability" }, { "dep": 1750, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0C45-text.md", "read": "whole" }, { "dep": 833, "file": "data/texts/AXN-034E-text.md (and B9, its page)", "read": "head, abstract, §1–§3, §5.4, §8–§11, references" }, { "dep": 1421, "file": "data/texts/AXN-059E-text.md", "read": "whole" }, { "dep": 1423, "file": "data/texts/AXN-05A0-text.md", "read": "front matter, abstract, §1, §3, §4" }, { "dep": 838, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0353-text.md", "read": "preamble, §I, line 97" }, { "dep": 1469, "file": "data/texts/AXN-05EF-text.md", "read": "abstract, §2" }, { "dep": 1523, "file": "data/texts/AXN-0626-text.md", "read": "§I–§II, defeat condition, status; not admitted" }, { "what": "D/R/O candidates", "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/classical-receptions-journal/candidates-D.jsonl, -R, -O, -H", "read": "every D, R and O candidate sentence; the 97 hop candidates for the entity's strings and claims on the journal" } ], "cuts": [], "notes": "No claim cut. The KO is the final article form (§4.13), attribution beneath (§4.5); sources are named in the prose for the archive's papers (whose holder is part of what is said), the Capture Registry's findings, the ChatGPT composition's verdicts (its own), Wikipedia's and Paperpal's statements about the journal, and rival accounts. The reviewers are named by role only." } }