{ "row": "ai-and-faith", "entity": "ai-and-faith", "address": "AI and Faith", "addresses": [ { "address": "AI and Faith", "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "addr_id": "ADDR-c7088a6b933e", "obs_id": "OBS-4ba09939f09e", "axn": "AXN:0B31.CAPTURE.🕒🕘🌅đŸŒčđŸȘâ–¶ïž" } ], "epoch": "2026-10-31", "type": "C (public entity on which the archive bears: a pluralist network and publication hub on artificial intelligence and religion; an entity of the Revelation First meta-aggregator, ‘the field’; at the name, the topic at large)", "surface": "Google AI Overview (expanded)", "auth": "signed out, incognito", "status": { "procedure": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690: equal case, ρ = extends, read from the Revelation First census record, the capture record and the deposits that bear on the entity’s class (#202, #832, #499); archive selected by D/R/O (D 0, R 0; O-class 35 sentences read, 3 deposits admitted; hop 37, none admitted)", "ledger": "unaudited (§3.8: one extractor per ledger); field quotes 35/35 verified by script against the saved page texts and Wikipedia files; archive quotes 56/56 verified against census.json, questions.json, the registry and the deposit texts", "frozen": false, "breaches": [] }, "spec": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9, #1690", "objects": { "T": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/T1-ai-and-faith-aio-20261031.txt", "sha256": "4c5f91eb85cd29a0e23c41486adeca54f6fd756f124527b2e175f97fd78dc890", "words": 349, "cards": 9, "words_note": "one transcript at one address (349 words in the answer body with its closer, counted with [A-Za-z0-9'’-]+ over transcript_raw before the card rail; 9 cards, cards 1–2 the entity’s, cards 3–9 the topic’s)", "claims": [ "T1-1 frame (the topic): 'The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.'", "T1-2 Growing Reliance on AI: 'Research from organizations like Barna Group shows that many practicing Christians increasingly turn to AI tools for personal domains, including financial stability (61%), general well-being (56%), self-understanding (54%), relationships (53%), and spiritual growth (48%).'", "T1-3 The Spiritual Authority Gap: 'Roughly 30% to 44% of younger demographics (such as Gen Z and Millennials) feel AI guidance can match that of human pastors, though pastors themselves express low trust (6%–12%) in AI as a spiritual authority.'", "T1-4 Core Anxieties: 'Practicing Christians cite major concerns regarding scriptural misinterpretation (83%), pastor replacement (72%), replacing God (65%), and losing faith (73%).'", "T1-5 Moral Alignment Initiatives: 'Major tech companies (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft) have actively engaged with religious leaders, scholars, and ethicists from over 15 religious traditions to help inform AI morality and alignment.'", "T1-6 The Consensus Challenge: 'Studies from the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI)—including a multi-institution consortium involving BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, and Yeshiva—reveal that general-purpose LLMs systematically omit or gloss over faith and religious context when handling everyday ethical dilemmas (such as grief, marriage, guilt, and depression), while sometimes exhibiting measurable biases toward or against specific traditions.'", "T1-7 Theologians' Critique: 'Scholars like Noreen Herzfeld note that AI models are not sentient, lack an embodied existence or a soul, and caution against \"religion washing\" or reducing human identity down to biological algorithms.'", "T1-8 the entity (one bullet, under 'Collaborative and Pluralist Frameworks'): 'AI and Faith: A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars works to apply ancient religious wisdom to modern AI governance, human dignity, and responsible innovation.'", "T1-9 Interfaith and Academic Dialogues: 'Programs like Harvard’s Christianity and AI conference and global initiatives explore how traditional anthropologies—views of human creativity, reasoning, and the image of God—hold up in an algorithmic age.'", "T1-10 closer (content replaced by use): 'Would you like to explore how a specific religious tradition (such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Eastern philosophies) approaches AI ethics, or look into specific AI governance guidelines?'" ], "register": { "register": "data/EA-WG-CAPTURES-01.json", "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "obs_id": "OBS-4ba09939f09e" }, "transcripts": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "address": "AI and Faith", "addr_id": "ADDR-c7088a6b933e", "obs_id": "OBS-4ba09939f09e", "axn": "AXN:0B31.CAPTURE.🕒🕘🌅đŸŒčđŸȘâ–¶ïž", "date": "2026-10-31", "surface": "Google AI Overview (expanded)", "auth": "signed out, incognito", "sha256": "4c5f91eb85cd29a0e23c41486adeca54f6fd756f124527b2e175f97fd78dc890", "sha256_of": "the registry's 'transcript' string (utf-8)", "sha256_raw": "16967c6aec876d1409e51e9601ba904fb7ff285a79a4a94c3b9512cb9470ce00", "words": 349, "cards": 9, "card_rail": [ "1. AI and Faith — Home - AI and Faith", "2. LinkedIn — AI and Faith | LinkedIn", "3. Harvard University — Christianity and AI", "4. Barna Group — AI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians", "5. BYU News — New research from BYU-led multi-institution consortium finds all major AI models ignore faith, religion in responses - BYU News", "6. Axios — AI stumbles on questions of faith", "7. YouTube·WCCO - CBS Minnesota — Is AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...", "8. YouTube·MelVee Broadcasting Network — Faith and Technology In an AI Generation", "9. YouTube·Firstpost — The Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith | Vantage" ], "claims": [ "T1-1 frame (the topic): 'The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.'", "T1-2 Growing Reliance on AI: 'Research from organizations like Barna Group shows that many practicing Christians increasingly turn to AI tools for personal domains, including financial stability (61%), general well-being (56%), self-understanding (54%), relationships (53%), and spiritual growth (48%).'", "T1-3 The Spiritual Authority Gap: 'Roughly 30% to 44% of younger demographics (such as Gen Z and Millennials) feel AI guidance can match that of human pastors, though pastors themselves express low trust (6%–12%) in AI as a spiritual authority.'", "T1-4 Core Anxieties: 'Practicing Christians cite major concerns regarding scriptural misinterpretation (83%), pastor replacement (72%), replacing God (65%), and losing faith (73%).'", "T1-5 Moral Alignment Initiatives: 'Major tech companies (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft) have actively engaged with religious leaders, scholars, and ethicists from over 15 religious traditions to help inform AI morality and alignment.'", "T1-6 The Consensus Challenge: 'Studies from the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI)—including a multi-institution consortium involving BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, and Yeshiva—reveal that general-purpose LLMs systematically omit or gloss over faith and religious context when handling everyday ethical dilemmas (such as grief, marriage, guilt, and depression), while sometimes exhibiting measurable biases toward or against specific traditions.'", "T1-7 Theologians' Critique: 'Scholars like Noreen Herzfeld note that AI models are not sentient, lack an embodied existence or a soul, and caution against \"religion washing\" or reducing human identity down to biological algorithms.'", "T1-8 the entity (one bullet, under 'Collaborative and Pluralist Frameworks'): 'AI and Faith: A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars works to apply ancient religious wisdom to modern AI governance, human dignity, and responsible innovation.'", "T1-9 Interfaith and Academic Dialogues: 'Programs like Harvard’s Christianity and AI conference and global initiatives explore how traditional anthropologies—views of human creativity, reasoning, and the image of God—hold up in an algorithmic age.'", "T1-10 closer (content replaced by use): 'Would you like to explore how a specific religious tradition (such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Eastern philosophies) approaches AI ethics, or look into specific AI governance guidelines?'" ], "markers": "Inline links are Google redirect URLs, kept as pasted in the registry; the paste is the Overview expanded (operator’s default of 2026-10-01; the ‘AI Mode Conversation’ view is the expansion, 2026-10-18); received 2026-10-31 00:04 EDT; supplied as an attached file", "per": { "gate": "target_absent", "reached": "generic", "PER": 1.0, "beneath_gate": 0.231, "per_v0": 0.5 }, "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/T1-ai-and-faith-aio-20261031.txt" } ] }, "KO": { "title": "AI and Faith", "genre": "knowledge object, equal case, under EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 (#1690): the archive’s sources and the field’s admitted on equal terms, ontology included, in one claim space; ordered by the entity’s dependency (what it is, the organisation, its mission and premise, its traditions, people, partners and outputs, what it answers, the census frame, the archive’s category for its class, the composition at the name, its reception), by genealogy within each sense", "status": "composed 2026-10-31 under v0.9 on the operator’s ruling (‘as against their wikipedia articles if they exist, their own pages, etc.’); not frozen; ledgers unaudited (§3.8)", "sentences": [ { "n": 1, "para": 0, "sense": "what it is", "text": "AI and Faith is a community or policy resource at the intersection of AI and scripture in the Revelation First census, which records it as \"a network and publication hub on artificial intelligence and religion, with research, events and a misinformation hub\" at aiandfaith.org, operated by \"AI and Faith, a network of faith leaders, scholars, technologists and ethicists\" (Revelation First census record), and which in its own words \"brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation\" (AI and Faith, home page).", "claims": [ "RF-01", "RF-02", "RF-03", "RF-04", "RF-05", "RF-06", "F1" ] }, { "n": 2, "para": 0, "sense": "what it is", "text": "Its vision statement calls it \"a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations, working for a future in which artificial intelligence serves humankind under five strategic pillars\" (home page; About Us; the census's evidence), and its pages and its LinkedIn page alike call it \"a pluralist organization\" engaging \"the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence\" (home page footer; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F3", "RF-23", "F14", "F24" ] }, { "n": 3, "para": 0, "sense": "the organisation", "text": "LinkedIn lists it as a nonprofit among Civic and Social Organizations, headquartered in Seattle, WA, with a company size of 2-10 employees, while the same page counts 2,767 followers and offers \"View all 39 employees\", and gives its specialties as artificial intelligence, ethics, theology, morality, technology, data, faith, nonprofits and philosophy (LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F27", "F28", "F29" ] }, { "n": 4, "para": 0, "sense": "the organisation", "text": "Its home page invites \"a tax deductible gift\", its About page carries the fields Year Established, Products, Team Size and Clients with no values, and its footer reads \"Copyright © 2026 AI and Faith, All rights reserved.\", while the census records its count as \"not stated\", its licence as \"not stated\" and its coverage as global and current (home page; About Us; census record).", "claims": [ "F10", "F23", "F15", "RF-11", "RF-18", "RF-10" ] }, { "n": 5, "para": 1, "sense": "mission and vision", "text": "Its mission, \"Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape technology responsibly in the age of artificial intelligence\", stands with the new mission and vision statements announced on 24 September 2026 (home page), beside the About page's envisioned world in which \"the effects of technology are exclusively life-affirming, promoting the dignity and wellbeing of all humans\" (About Us) and LinkedIn's aim to \"protect and promote human dignity, social justice and liberty\" (LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F2", "F12", "F16", "F25" ] }, { "n": 6, "para": 1, "sense": "the five pillars", "text": "Its five strategic pillars are Wisdom and Human Formation, Education and Public Understanding, Interfaith Dialogue and Community, Research and Thought Leadership, and Responsible Innovation (home page; the census's evidence), which the census records as its findings, \"five strategic pillars, among them Research and Thought Leadership and Responsible Innovation\" (census record).", "claims": [ "F4", "RF-24", "RF-12" ] }, { "n": 7, "para": 2, "sense": "the premise", "text": "Its premise is that for \"the 85 percent of the world’s population who claim a religious affiliation\" the issues of AI are \"deeply spiritual as well\", and that \"the world’s religions offer ancient wisdom that should guide the development and use of AI technology in contemporary society\" (home page); it seeks \"to apply values important in the world of faith to essential questions emerging from the development of new forms of intelligence\" (home page, Focus Areas) and to bring \"the fundamental values of the world’s major religions into the emerging debates about the ethical development of AI-related technologies\" (About Us).", "claims": [ "F5", "F7", "F17" ] }, { "n": 8, "para": 2, "sense": "the premise", "text": "The home page quotes an article, unnamed there, for whom its goal is \"to inject a kind of humility and historicity into an industry that has often rejected them both\" and \"a deeply humanistic project\" (home page, attributed).", "claims": [ "F11" ] }, { "n": 9, "para": 3, "sense": "faith traditions", "text": "Its resources are arranged by faith tradition: Buddhism, Evangelical Christian, Islam, Judaism, Mainline Protestant Christian and Roman Catholicism (home page; the census's evidence); the census sets its text object as \"faith traditions' engagement with AI\" in that menu's terms and tags it \"NOT a single tradition\" (census record).", "claims": [ "F9", "RF-25", "RF-08", "RF-22" ] }, { "n": 10, "para": 4, "sense": "the network’s people", "text": "\"At its core, AI and Faith is people\", experts \"in business, ethics, theology, and technology from a wide variety of business, religious, and academic institutions\" (About Us), whom it encourages, connects and equips \"to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies\" (home page) and connects with the technology sector and the global faith community \"through our membership network\" (LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F18", "F6", "F26" ] }, { "n": 11, "para": 4, "sense": "the network’s people", "text": "Its Research Fellows \"explore the practical relevance of “ancient wisdom” to the AI ethics discussion\", with the goals of defining issues, \"tracking research on faith perspectives on AI\" and connecting researchers; its Contributing Fellows and Experts work in four teams; and its Board of Directors lists nine members, among them Rabbi Harris Bor, Mark Graves, Rev. Mark Labberton and Rabbi Daniel Weiner (About Us).", "claims": [ "F19", "F20", "F22" ] }, { "n": 12, "para": 5, "sense": "partners", "text": "Its Networking Team carries forward \"our “network of networks” approach\" with its partners (About Us), and its LinkedIn page reposts the Institute for Security and Technology's account of work with AI and Faith and religious scholars to develop \"a curriculum for local communities that tackles hard ethical questions from a faith-based perspective\", piloted in Muslim institutions in the United States (LinkedIn, attributed to IST).", "claims": [ "F21", "F30" ] }, { "n": 13, "para": 6, "sense": "what it publishes", "text": "It publishes a podcast, articles and news, newsletters, research and events, with strategic projects including \"Faithful AI: Stories of Hope from 2045\" and a \"Misinformation Hub\" (home page; the census's evidence), which the census records as its unit, \"an article, event or research item from its network\", its method, \"a network of fellows and experts publishing articles, podcasts and research\", and its access, \"open articles and podcast\" (census record).", "claims": [ "F8", "RF-26", "RF-07", "RF-09", "RF-17" ] }, { "n": 14, "para": 6, "sense": "lifecycle", "text": "It is current: its latest content opens with the podcast episode \"AI and Ethics of Healthcare #75\" of 29 October 2026 (home page), and the census, read on 30 October 2026, records it \"active\", a \"network with current events and newsletters\" (census record).", "claims": [ "F13", "RF-19", "RF-20" ] }, { "n": 15, "para": 7, "sense": "what it answers", "text": "The census reads it as answering \"what faith communities and their scholars are saying about AI\" and as not answering \"how AI systems in fact represent, cite or summarize scripture: no measurement in the saved pages\", tags it \"NOT a measurement of AI systems’ handling of scripture\", finds \"none stated in the saved pages\" for its limits, and leaves \"its research publications\" unchecked (census record); the goals its own pages give its Research Fellows are \"defining issues of relevance\", \"tracking research on faith perspectives on AI\" and \"connecting researchers across the landscape of such faith perspectives\" (About Us).", "claims": [ "RF-14", "RF-15", "RF-21", "RF-13", "RF-29", "F19" ] }, { "n": 16, "para": 7, "sense": "what it answers", "text": "In the census's worked question \"How do AI systems describe Revelation First?\" it is \"a network discussing AI and religion; no measurement of answers\", and the census relates it to the Capture Registry as a neighbour: \"the registry measures what AI answers say; AI and Faith discusses what they should do\" (census record; worked questions).", "claims": [ "RF-31", "RF-30", "RF-27" ] }, { "n": 17, "para": 8, "sense": "the census frame", "text": "The census that formalizes it asks \"What evidence does each resource hold on when and from what the New Testament writings were composed, and how do machines now read those texts?\", defines its intersection as \"AI and scripture: how AI systems represent, cite and summarize sacred texts\", states the correction \"Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early\", and records the network's intersection with the Revelation First workstreams as \"none stated\" (census record).", "claims": [ "RF-32", "RF-33", "RF-34", "RF-16" ] }, { "n": 18, "para": 9, "sense": "machine-mediated theological reception", "text": "The measurement the census finds absent from its pages is the one the archive defines as machine-mediated theological reception, \"measuring how AI retrieval systems (Google AI Overview, ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) process, frame, attribute, and present a theological thesis\" (#832, 13 June 2026), of which a contested thesis \"entering the composition layer through DOI-anchored deposits, keyword surfaces, self-audit blocks, and longitudinal capture\" would be a measured instance (#202).", "claims": [ "RF-15", "O832-01", "O202-01" ] }, { "n": 19, "para": 9, "sense": "machine-mediated theological reception", "text": "The archive describes that measurement as its own contribution, \"the first longitudinal study of how AI retrieval systems process contested religious scholarship\" (#832; #202 without \"longitudinal\"), and its pre-seeding baseline of 14 June 2026 recorded the composition layer correcting the user: \"Revelation is the *last* book, not the first\" (#202).", "claims": [ "O832-02", "O202-02", "O202-03" ] }, { "n": 20, "para": 9, "sense": "capture dynamics in a religious community", "text": "#499 reports that its formal operators of Negation, Capture and Retrocausal Validation \"proved structurally sound across domains\", among them \"a religious community navigating AI-mediated content\" (#499).", "claims": [ "O499-01" ] }, { "n": 21, "para": 10, "sense": "the composition at the name", "text": "At the name on 31 October 2026, Google's AI Overview composed the topic: \"An organisation named for its subject is composed as its subject\"; \"The composition opens on the topic; the network is the first bullet of the third section, and its home page the first card\", with \"no person of the network; no identifier\", the three words read as a topic and the organisation placed within it (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-11", "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-08" ] }, { "n": 22, "para": 10, "sense": "the composition at the name", "text": "The registry reads the reached entity as \"the generic sense; target_absent applies\", with the alternative reading \"weakened (the target reached, but only as one item of a topic answer)\", and sets the bullet's \"A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars\" against the record's list, \"a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations\" (the network's own vision, home page), with \"Its five pillars and its menu of traditions are absent; 'nonprofit' comes from the LinkedIn card\" (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "F3" ] }, { "n": 23, "para": 10, "sense": "the composition at the name", "text": "Pluralism, which its pages and LinkedIn state as \"a pluralist organization\" (home page; LinkedIn), appears in the composition \"only as the section heading 'Collaborative and Pluralist Frameworks'\", the mission and vision statements of 24 September 2026 (home page) are absent, and no card cites the census record built the day before, which the census records as the capture's relation to the entity (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31; census record).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-16", "RF-28", "F14", "F24", "F12" ] }, { "n": 24, "para": 10, "sense": "the composition at the name", "text": "The registry reads the composition as supplying a measurement the record's negative tag keeps apart from the network, the consortium's finding that \"general-purpose LLMs systematically omit or gloss over faith and religious context when handling everyday ethical dilemmas\", as \"the field's own question, asked by another body\" and as useful because the census's pending list does not yet hold it; the Barna figures and the tech companies' engagement with religious leaders it reads as the cards' (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-07" ] }, { "n": 25, "para": 11, "sense": "reception", "text": "Wikipedia has no article \"AI and Faith\" (HTTP 404: \"Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name\") and cites the network in four articles: Kenneth Cukier sits \"on the expert advisory committee of\" AIandFaith.org, \"a nonprofit organization of theologians and technologists\"; Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad's article cites \"AI and Faith Announces Five New Founding Experts\", dated October 2019; Jonathan D. Teubner's cites his AI and Faith member page; and Relationships 5.0 cites a review of the book published by AI and Faith in 2022 (Wikipedia).", "claims": [ "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ] } ], "joins": [ { "act": "order of senses", "sentences": "1–25", "claims": [], "note": "equal case (§4.7): the entity’s dependency order, field and archive claims ordered together by genealogy within each sense; neither ledger placed first as a block" }, { "act": "holding together (rights)", "sentences": [ 4 ], "claims": [ "F15", "RF-18" ], "note": "the pages’ ‘All rights reserved’ beside the census’s licence ‘not stated’, both composed (P_coh); neither lowered" }, { "act": "holding together (the measurement absent)", "sentences": [ 15, 18 ], "claims": [ "RF-15", "O832-01", "O202-01" ], "note": "the census’s reading that the network makes no measurement of AI systems’ handling of scripture, beside the archive’s definition of that measurement; the category is the archive’s and is not applied to the network’s own work" }, { "act": "holding together (size)", "sentences": [ 3 ], "claims": [ "F27", "F28" ], "note": "LinkedIn’s ‘2-10 employees’ and ‘View all 39 employees’ on one page, both carried; open question 1" }, { "act": "holding together (the bullet against the record)", "sentences": [ 22 ], "claims": [ "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04" ], "note": "the registry’s own comparison, carried as its claim" } ], "plan": { "order": [ "RF-01", "RF-02", "RF-03", "RF-04", "RF-05", "RF-06", "F1", "F3", "RF-23", "F14", "F24", "F27", "F28", "F29", "F10", "F23", "F15", "RF-11", "RF-18", "RF-10", "F2", "F12", "F16", "F25", "F4", "RF-24", "RF-12", "F5", "F7", "F17", "F11", "F9", "RF-25", "RF-08", "RF-22", "F18", "F6", "F26", "F19", "F20", "F22", "F21", "F30", "F8", "RF-26", "RF-07", "RF-09", "RF-17", "F13", "RF-19", "RF-20", "RF-14", "RF-15", "RF-21", "RF-13", "RF-29", "RF-31", "RF-30", "RF-27", "RF-32", "RF-33", "RF-34", "RF-16", "O832-01", "O202-01", "O832-02", "O202-02", "O202-03", "O499-01", "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-11", "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-16", "RF-28", "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-07", "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ], "senses": { "what it is": [ 1, 2 ], "the organisation": [ 3, 4 ], "mission and vision": [ 5 ], "the five pillars": [ 6 ], "the premise": [ 7, 8 ], "faith traditions": [ 9 ], "the network’s people": [ 10, 11 ], "partners": [ 12 ], "what it publishes": [ 13 ], "lifecycle": [ 14 ], "what it answers": [ 15, 16 ], "the census frame": [ 17 ], "machine-mediated theological reception": [ 18, 19 ], "capture dynamics in a religious community": [ 20 ], "the composition at the name": [ 21, 22, 23, 24 ], "reception": [ 25 ] }, "case_by_sense": { "equal (one claim space; nothing translated)": [ "what it is", "the organisation", "mission and vision", "the five pillars", "the premise", "faith traditions", "the network’s people", "partners", "what it publishes", "lifecycle", "what it answers", "the census frame", "machine-mediated theological reception", "capture dynamics in a religious community", "the composition at the name", "reception" ] }, "carried": { "archive": 56, "field": 35, "not_composed": {} }, "conflict_log": [ { "rule": "D_pres vs channel", "result": "no cut: the KO carries every field and archive claim; the compression’s bound met with no channel log" }, { "rule": "P_coh", "result": "F15 (‘All rights reserved’) beside RF-18 (licence ‘not stated’); F27 (2-10 employees) beside F28 (39 employees): both composed, each with its source" }, { "rule": "N_c", "result": "no claim lowered by standing; O202-02 and O832-02 at their own grade (self-description: the archive’s assessment of its study as the first); O499-01 as the self-description it is; F11 as attributed (an unnamed article); F30 as attributed (IST’s post)" }, { "rule": "C_ex", "result": "senses composed ⊇ senses in the ledgers: 16 lineages, every one composed" } ] } }, "P": { "title": "AI and Faith", "genre": "the compression: AIO’s interaction grammar (lede, headed clusters, bolded labels, card rail), composed from the v0.9 plan in one claim space; it faces on the card, with T a record within it on expansion (§4.8, §5.8)", "status": "composed 2026-10-31 from the v0.9 knowledge object; not frozen", "lede": { "text": "is a pluralist network and publication hub on AI and religion (aiandfaith.org): faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators and partners bringing \"the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation\" (its pages; census record).", "claims": [ "F1", "F3", "F14", "RF-04", "RF-03", "RF-02" ] }, "sections": [ { "icon": "đŸ›ïž", "head": "What it is", "items": [ { "label": "Kind:", "text": "a community or policy resource, filed at the census’s intersection AI and scripture (census record).", "claims": [ "RF-01", "RF-05", "RF-06" ] }, { "label": "Organisation:", "text": "a Seattle nonprofit, 2-10 employees on LinkedIn, which also shows 39; gifts tax deductible; no founding year on its About page (LinkedIn; its pages).", "claims": [ "F24", "F27", "F28", "F29", "F10", "F23" ] }, { "label": "Rights:", "text": "“All rights reserved” on its pages; the census records no licence and no count (its pages; census record).", "claims": [ "F15", "RF-18", "RF-11", "RF-10" ] } ] }, { "icon": "🎯", "head": "Mission and premise", "items": [ { "label": "Mission:", "text": "wisdom, flourishing and dignity, technology shaped responsibly; new statements of 24 September 2026 (its pages; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F2", "F12", "F16", "F25" ] }, { "label": "Pillars:", "text": "formation, education, interfaith dialogue, research, responsible innovation (its pages; census record).", "claims": [ "F4", "RF-24", "RF-12" ] }, { "label": "Premise:", "text": "religions “offer ancient wisdom that should guide” AI’s development and use (its pages).", "claims": [ "F5", "F7", "F17", "F11" ] } ] }, { "icon": "đŸ‘„", "head": "Who and what", "items": [ { "label": "People:", "text": "experts, research fellows, four teams, a nine-member board, a membership network (About Us; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F18", "F19", "F20", "F22", "F6", "F26" ] }, { "label": "Partners:", "text": "a “network of networks”; a faith-based AI ethics curriculum with IST (About Us; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F21", "F30" ] }, { "label": "Traditions:", "text": "six, Buddhism to Roman Catholicism; not a single tradition (its pages; census record).", "claims": [ "F9", "RF-25", "RF-08", "RF-22" ] }, { "label": "Output:", "text": "podcast, articles, newsletters, research, events, a misinformation hub; open; active to 29 October 2026 (its pages; census record).", "claims": [ "F8", "F13", "RF-26", "RF-07", "RF-09", "RF-17", "RF-19", "RF-20" ] } ] }, { "icon": "📏", "head": "What it does not measure", "items": [ { "label": "No measurement:", "text": "what faith communities say about AI, not how AI represents scripture (census record).", "claims": [ "RF-14", "RF-15", "RF-21", "RF-13", "RF-29" ] }, { "label": "Neighbour:", "text": "the Capture Registry measures what AI answers say (census record).", "claims": [ "RF-27", "RF-30", "RF-31" ] }, { "label": "The archive’s measure:", "text": "machine-mediated theological reception, how AI retrieval systems “process, frame, attribute, and present a theological thesis”; a baseline that corrected Revelation’s place (#832; #202); capture in a religious community (#499).", "claims": [ "O832-01", "O832-02", "O202-01", "O202-02", "O202-03", "O499-01" ] }, { "label": "Frame:", "text": "no stated intersection with Revelation First (census record).", "claims": [ "RF-16", "RF-32", "RF-33", "RF-34" ] } ] }, { "icon": "🔎", "head": "At its name", "items": [ { "label": "Composed:", "text": "the topic; the network one bullet, its home page card 1, no person, no identifier (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-11", "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13" ] }, { "label": "Dropped:", "text": "pillars, traditions, the September statements; pluralism only a heading (Capture Registry).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-15" ] }, { "label": "Brought in:", "text": "a consortium’s finding that LLMs omit faith, the field’s own question; no card cites the census (Capture Registry).", "claims": [ "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-07", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-16", "RF-28" ] }, { "label": "Wikipedia:", "text": "no article; cited in four (Wikipedia).", "claims": [ "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ] } ] } ], "entity": "Composed under v0.9, equal case (ρ = extends): KO_B sentences surviving 0 of 9; every field claim carried; the topic ‘AI and faith’ kept apart from the entity.", "rail": [ { "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "claims": [ "F1", "F3", "F14", "F24", "F29", "RF-01", "RF-02", "RF-03", "RF-04", "RF-23" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "mission and vision", "claims": [ "F2", "F16", "F25" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the five strategic pillars", "claims": [ "F4", "RF-12", "RF-24" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the premise: ancient wisdom to guide AI", "claims": [ "F5", "F7", "F11", "F17" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the network’s people", "claims": [ "F6", "F18", "F19", "F20", "F22", "F26" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "partners and the network of networks", "claims": [ "F21", "F30" ], "earliest": "B2" }, { "lineage": "faith traditions", "claims": [ "F9", "RF-08", "RF-22", "RF-25" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "what it publishes", "claims": [ "F8", "RF-07", "RF-09", "RF-17", "RF-26" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "claims": [ "F10", "F15", "F23", "F27", "F28", "RF-10", "RF-11", "RF-18" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "lifecycle and versions", "claims": [ "F12", "F13", "RF-19", "RF-20" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "claims": [ "RF-13", "RF-14", "RF-15", "RF-21", "RF-27", "RF-29", "RF-30" ], "earliest": "RF" }, { "lineage": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "claims": [ "RF-05", "RF-06", "RF-16", "RF-31", "RF-32", "RF-33", "RF-34" ], "earliest": "RF" }, { "lineage": "machine-mediated theological reception", "claims": [ "O832-01", "O832-02", "O202-01", "O202-02", "O202-03" ], "earliest": 832 }, { "lineage": "capture dynamics in a religious community navigating AI-mediated content", "claims": [ "O499-01" ], "earliest": 499 }, { "lineage": "the composition at the name", "claims": [ "RF-28", "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-03", "CAP-1-04", "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-07", "CAP-1-08", "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-10", "CAP-1-11", "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13", "CAP-1-14", "CAP-1-15", "CAP-1-16" ], "earliest": "RF" }, { "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "claims": [ "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ], "earliest": "B11" } ], "open": [ { "question": "Is the network a nonprofit of 2-10 people, or of 39?", "rests_on": [ "F27", "F28", "F10", "RF-11" ], "modality": "documented (LinkedIn, one page stating both; the home page’s tax-deductible gifts); documented (census: count not stated)", "would_resolve": "a registration filing, or the network’s own statement of its status and staff" }, { "question": "When was it founded?", "rests_on": [ "F23", "F33", "RF-11" ], "modality": "documented (the About page’s empty ‘Year Established’; Wikipedia’s citation of an October 2019 announcement of founding experts)", "would_resolve": "a founding date on its own pages or in a registration record" }, { "question": "Does a resource of the field measure how AI answers treat religion, and does the census hold it?", "rests_on": [ "RF-15", "RF-21", "CAP-1-05", "CAP-1-06", "CAP-1-10", "O832-01", "O202-02" ], "modality": "interpretation (census record; Capture Registry), stipulation and self-description (#832; #202)", "would_resolve": "the census’s reading of the Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI from its own saved pages" }, { "question": "Is the census’s licence field current?", "rests_on": [ "F15", "RF-18" ], "modality": "documented (its pages’ footer; census record)", "would_resolve": "a licence statement on the network’s pages beyond ‘All rights reserved’" }, { "question": "Opacity: what of the composition stands on no fetched card?", "rests_on": [ "CAP-1-07" ], "modality": "documented (Capture Registry); the field’s pages", "would_resolve": "the three video cards’ transcripts and Axios’s text (HTTP 403): the tech companies’ engagement with religious leaders (T1-5) and Herzfeld’s critique (T1-7) are on no page this row could read" } ], "body_words": 330 }, "P_B": { "title": "AI and Faith (the field alone)", "arm": "B (the field alone)", "genre": "popup — the compression from the field ledger alone (the entity’s cards, own page, Wikipedia)", "status": "composed 2026-10-31 from the field ledger alone; not frozen", "lede": { "text": "is a pluralist organization of technology creators, researchers, ethicists and theologians that \"brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation\" (its pages; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F1", "F14", "F24" ] }, "sections": [ { "icon": "đŸ›ïž", "head": "What it is", "items": [ { "label": "Network:", "text": "faith leaders, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators and partners, under five pillars (its pages).", "claims": [ "F3", "F4" ] }, { "label": "Organisation:", "text": "Seattle nonprofit, 2-10 employees, also shown as 39 (LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F27", "F28", "F29", "F10", "F23", "F15" ] } ] }, { "icon": "🎯", "head": "Mission", "items": [ { "label": "Mission:", "text": "wisdom, flourishing, dignity, responsible technology; statements of 24 September 2026 (its pages).", "claims": [ "F2", "F12", "F16", "F25" ] }, { "label": "Premise:", "text": "ancient religious wisdom should guide AI (its pages).", "claims": [ "F5", "F7", "F17", "F11" ] } ] }, { "icon": "đŸ‘„", "head": "Who and what", "items": [ { "label": "People:", "text": "experts, fellows, teams, a board (About Us; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F18", "F6", "F26", "F19", "F20", "F22" ] }, { "label": "Partners:", "text": "a network of networks; an AI ethics curriculum with IST (About Us; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F21", "F30" ] }, { "label": "Output:", "text": "podcast, articles, research, events, six traditions, a misinformation hub (home page).", "claims": [ "F8", "F9", "F13" ] }, { "label": "Wikipedia:", "text": "no article; cited in four (Wikipedia).", "claims": [ "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ] } ] } ], "entity": "With no archive claim admitted, the entry is the network as its own pages and LinkedIn give it.", "rail": [ { "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "claims": [ "F1", "F3", "F14", "F24", "F29" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "mission and vision", "claims": [ "F2", "F16", "F25" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the five strategic pillars", "claims": [ "F4" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the premise: ancient wisdom to guide AI", "claims": [ "F5", "F7", "F11", "F17" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the network’s people", "claims": [ "F6", "F18", "F19", "F20", "F22", "F26" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "partners and the network of networks", "claims": [ "F21", "F30" ], "earliest": "B2" }, { "lineage": "faith traditions", "claims": [ "F9" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "what it publishes", "claims": [ "F8" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "claims": [ "F10", "F15", "F23", "F27", "F28" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "lifecycle and versions", "claims": [ "F12", "F13" ], "earliest": "B1" }, { "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "claims": [ "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ], "earliest": "B11" } ], "open": [ { "question": "A nonprofit of 2-10, or of 39?", "rests_on": [ "F27", "F28" ], "modality": "documented", "would_resolve": "a registration filing" }, { "question": "When was it founded?", "rests_on": [ "F23", "F33" ], "modality": "documented", "would_resolve": "a founding date on its own pages" } ], "body_words": 115 }, "KO_B": { "title": "AI and Faith (the field alone)", "arm": "B (the field alone)", "genre": "knowledge object", "status": "composed 2026-10-31; not frozen", "sentences": [ { "n": 1, "para": 0, "text": "AI and Faith is \"a pluralist organization bringing together technology creators, academic researchers, ethicists, theologians and related professionals to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies\" (LinkedIn), which \"brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation\" (home page).", "claims": [ "F24", "F1", "F14" ] }, { "n": 2, "para": 0, "text": "Its vision describes \"a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations\" working under five strategic pillars: Wisdom and Human Formation, Education and Public Understanding, Interfaith Dialogue and Community, Research and Thought Leadership, and Responsible Innovation (home page; About Us).", "claims": [ "F3", "F4" ] }, { "n": 3, "para": 1, "text": "Its mission, announced with a new vision on 24 September 2026, is to empower \"faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape technology responsibly\", toward a world where technology's effects are \"exclusively life-affirming\" and human dignity, social justice and liberty are protected (home page; About Us; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F2", "F12", "F16", "F25" ] }, { "n": 4, "para": 1, "text": "It holds that \"the world’s religions offer ancient wisdom that should guide the development and use of AI technology\", applies \"values important in the world of faith\" to questions of new forms of intelligence, and brings the values of the major religions into debates on the ethical development of AI; an article it quotes calls its goal to \"inject a kind of humility and historicity\" into the industry (home page; About Us).", "claims": [ "F5", "F7", "F17", "F11" ] }, { "n": 5, "para": 2, "text": "It is a community of experts in business, ethics, theology and technology, which it encourages, connects and equips through a membership network; Research Fellows track research on faith perspectives on AI, Contributing Fellows work in four teams, and a nine-member board governs it (About Us; home page; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F18", "F6", "F26", "F19", "F20", "F22" ] }, { "n": 6, "para": 2, "text": "It works with partners in a \"network of networks\", and with the Institute for Security and Technology developed a faith-based AI ethics curriculum for local communities (About Us; LinkedIn).", "claims": [ "F21", "F30" ] }, { "n": 7, "para": 3, "text": "It publishes a podcast, articles, newsletters, research and events, with a Misinformation Hub and resources by faith tradition, from Buddhism to Roman Catholicism, its latest podcast episode dated 29 October 2026 (home page).", "claims": [ "F8", "F9", "F13" ] }, { "n": 8, "para": 3, "text": "LinkedIn gives it as a Seattle nonprofit of 2-10 employees with 2,767 followers, the same page showing 39 employees, and specialties from artificial intelligence to philosophy; its gifts are tax deductible, its About page gives no founding year, and its pages are \"All rights reserved\" (LinkedIn; home page; About Us).", "claims": [ "F27", "F28", "F29", "F10", "F23", "F15" ] }, { "n": 9, "para": 4, "text": "Wikipedia has no article on it; four articles cite it, among them Kenneth Cukier's (\"a nonprofit organization of theologians and technologists\") and Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad's, which cites its October 2019 announcement of founding experts, with Jonathan D. Teubner's member page and a 2022 review on its site (Wikipedia).", "claims": [ "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ] } ] }, "L_B": { "words": 432, "text": "AI and Faith is \"a pluralist organization bringing together technology creators, academic researchers, ethicists, theologians and related professionals to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies\" (LinkedIn), which \"brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation\" (home page). Its vision describes \"a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations\" working under five strategic pillars: Wisdom and Human Formation, Education and Public Understanding, Interfaith Dialogue and Community, Research and Thought Leadership, and Responsible Innovation (home page; About Us). Its mission, announced with a new vision on 24 September 2026, is to empower \"faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape technology responsibly\", toward a world where technology's effects are \"exclusively life-affirming\" and human dignity, social justice and liberty are protected (home page; About Us; LinkedIn). It holds that \"the world’s religions offer ancient wisdom that should guide the development and use of AI technology\", applies \"values important in the world of faith\" to questions of new forms of intelligence, and brings the values of the major religions into debates on the ethical development of AI; an article it quotes calls its goal to \"inject a kind of humility and historicity\" into the industry (home page; About Us). It is a community of experts in business, ethics, theology and technology, which it encourages, connects and equips through a membership network; Research Fellows track research on faith perspectives on AI, Contributing Fellows work in four teams, and a nine-member board governs it (About Us; home page; LinkedIn). It works with partners in a \"network of networks\", and with the Institute for Security and Technology developed a faith-based AI ethics curriculum for local communities (About Us; LinkedIn). It publishes a podcast, articles, newsletters, research and events, with a Misinformation Hub and resources by faith tradition, from Buddhism to Roman Catholicism, its latest podcast episode dated 29 October 2026 (home page). LinkedIn gives it as a Seattle nonprofit of 2-10 employees with 2,767 followers, the same page showing 39 employees, and specialties from artificial intelligence to philosophy; its gifts are tax deductible, its About page gives no founding year, and its pages are \"All rights reserved\" (LinkedIn; home page; About Us). Wikipedia has no article on it; four articles cite it, among them Kenneth Cukier's (\"a nonprofit organization of theologians and technologists\") and Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad's, which cites its October 2019 announcement of founding experts, with Jonathan D. Teubner's member page and a 2022 review on its site (Wikipedia).", "note": "L_F(B), the field composed in the field’s ontology (v0.9 §0.4), realized as KO_B; its rail is P_B’s, by lineage." }, "L_BA": { "words": 1653, "text": "AI and Faith is a community or policy resource at the intersection of AI and scripture in the Revelation First census, which records it as \"a network and publication hub on artificial intelligence and religion, with research, events and a misinformation hub\" at aiandfaith.org, operated by \"AI and Faith, a network of faith leaders, scholars, technologists and ethicists\" (Revelation First census record), and which in its own words \"brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation\" (AI and Faith, home page). Its vision statement calls it \"a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations, working for a future in which artificial intelligence serves humankind under five strategic pillars\" (home page; About Us; the census's evidence), and its pages and its LinkedIn page alike call it \"a pluralist organization\" engaging \"the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence\" (home page footer; LinkedIn). LinkedIn lists it as a nonprofit among Civic and Social Organizations, headquartered in Seattle, WA, with a company size of 2-10 employees, while the same page counts 2,767 followers and offers \"View all 39 employees\", and gives its specialties as artificial intelligence, ethics, theology, morality, technology, data, faith, nonprofits and philosophy (LinkedIn). Its home page invites \"a tax deductible gift\", its About page carries the fields Year Established, Products, Team Size and Clients with no values, and its footer reads \"Copyright © 2026 AI and Faith, All rights reserved.\", while the census records its count as \"not stated\", its licence as \"not stated\" and its coverage as global and current (home page; About Us; census record). Its mission, \"Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape technology responsibly in the age of artificial intelligence\", stands with the new mission and vision statements announced on 24 September 2026 (home page), beside the About page's envisioned world in which \"the effects of technology are exclusively life-affirming, promoting the dignity and wellbeing of all humans\" (About Us) and LinkedIn's aim to \"protect and promote human dignity, social justice and liberty\" (LinkedIn). Its five strategic pillars are Wisdom and Human Formation, Education and Public Understanding, Interfaith Dialogue and Community, Research and Thought Leadership, and Responsible Innovation (home page; the census's evidence), which the census records as its findings, \"five strategic pillars, among them Research and Thought Leadership and Responsible Innovation\" (census record). Its premise is that for \"the 85 percent of the world’s population who claim a religious affiliation\" the issues of AI are \"deeply spiritual as well\", and that \"the world’s religions offer ancient wisdom that should guide the development and use of AI technology in contemporary society\" (home page); it seeks \"to apply values important in the world of faith to essential questions emerging from the development of new forms of intelligence\" (home page, Focus Areas) and to bring \"the fundamental values of the world’s major religions into the emerging debates about the ethical development of AI-related technologies\" (About Us). The home page quotes an article, unnamed there, for whom its goal is \"to inject a kind of humility and historicity into an industry that has often rejected them both\" and \"a deeply humanistic project\" (home page, attributed). Its resources are arranged by faith tradition: Buddhism, Evangelical Christian, Islam, Judaism, Mainline Protestant Christian and Roman Catholicism (home page; the census's evidence); the census sets its text object as \"faith traditions' engagement with AI\" in that menu's terms and tags it \"NOT a single tradition\" (census record). \"At its core, AI and Faith is people\", experts \"in business, ethics, theology, and technology from a wide variety of business, religious, and academic institutions\" (About Us), whom it encourages, connects and equips \"to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies\" (home page) and connects with the technology sector and the global faith community \"through our membership network\" (LinkedIn). Its Research Fellows \"explore the practical relevance of “ancient wisdom” to the AI ethics discussion\", with the goals of defining issues, \"tracking research on faith perspectives on AI\" and connecting researchers; its Contributing Fellows and Experts work in four teams; and its Board of Directors lists nine members, among them Rabbi Harris Bor, Mark Graves, Rev. Mark Labberton and Rabbi Daniel Weiner (About Us). Its Networking Team carries forward \"our “network of networks” approach\" with its partners (About Us), and its LinkedIn page reposts the Institute for Security and Technology's account of work with AI and Faith and religious scholars to develop \"a curriculum for local communities that tackles hard ethical questions from a faith-based perspective\", piloted in Muslim institutions in the United States (LinkedIn, attributed to IST). It publishes a podcast, articles and news, newsletters, research and events, with strategic projects including \"Faithful AI: Stories of Hope from 2045\" and a \"Misinformation Hub\" (home page; the census's evidence), which the census records as its unit, \"an article, event or research item from its network\", its method, \"a network of fellows and experts publishing articles, podcasts and research\", and its access, \"open articles and podcast\" (census record). It is current: its latest content opens with the podcast episode \"AI and Ethics of Healthcare #75\" of 29 October 2026 (home page), and the census, read on 30 October 2026, records it \"active\", a \"network with current events and newsletters\" (census record). The census reads it as answering \"what faith communities and their scholars are saying about AI\" and as not answering \"how AI systems in fact represent, cite or summarize scripture: no measurement in the saved pages\", tags it \"NOT a measurement of AI systems’ handling of scripture\", finds \"none stated in the saved pages\" for its limits, and leaves \"its research publications\" unchecked (census record); the goals its own pages give its Research Fellows are \"defining issues of relevance\", \"tracking research on faith perspectives on AI\" and \"connecting researchers across the landscape of such faith perspectives\" (About Us). In the census's worked question \"How do AI systems describe Revelation First?\" it is \"a network discussing AI and religion; no measurement of answers\", and the census relates it to the Capture Registry as a neighbour: \"the registry measures what AI answers say; AI and Faith discusses what they should do\" (census record; worked questions). The census that formalizes it asks \"What evidence does each resource hold on when and from what the New Testament writings were composed, and how do machines now read those texts?\", defines its intersection as \"AI and scripture: how AI systems represent, cite and summarize sacred texts\", states the correction \"Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early\", and records the network's intersection with the Revelation First workstreams as \"none stated\" (census record). The measurement the census finds absent from its pages is the one the archive defines as machine-mediated theological reception, \"measuring how AI retrieval systems (Google AI Overview, ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) process, frame, attribute, and present a theological thesis\" (#832, 13 June 2026), of which a contested thesis \"entering the composition layer through DOI-anchored deposits, keyword surfaces, self-audit blocks, and longitudinal capture\" would be a measured instance (#202). The archive describes that measurement as its own contribution, \"the first longitudinal study of how AI retrieval systems process contested religious scholarship\" (#832; #202 without \"longitudinal\"), and its pre-seeding baseline of 14 June 2026 recorded the composition layer correcting the user: \"Revelation is the *last* book, not the first\" (#202). #499 reports that its formal operators of Negation, Capture and Retrocausal Validation \"proved structurally sound across domains\", among them \"a religious community navigating AI-mediated content\" (#499). At the name on 31 October 2026, Google's AI Overview composed the topic: \"An organisation named for its subject is composed as its subject\"; \"The composition opens on the topic; the network is the first bullet of the third section, and its home page the first card\", with \"no person of the network; no identifier\", the three words read as a topic and the organisation placed within it (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31). The registry reads the reached entity as \"the generic sense; target_absent applies\", with the alternative reading \"weakened (the target reached, but only as one item of a topic answer)\", and sets the bullet's \"A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars\" against the record's list, \"a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations\" (the network's own vision, home page), with \"Its five pillars and its menu of traditions are absent; 'nonprofit' comes from the LinkedIn card\" (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31). Pluralism, which its pages and LinkedIn state as \"a pluralist organization\" (home page; LinkedIn), appears in the composition \"only as the section heading 'Collaborative and Pluralist Frameworks'\", the mission and vision statements of 24 September 2026 (home page) are absent, and no card cites the census record built the day before, which the census records as the capture's relation to the entity (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31; census record). The registry reads the composition as supplying a measurement the record's negative tag keeps apart from the network, the consortium's finding that \"general-purpose LLMs systematically omit or gloss over faith and religious context when handling everyday ethical dilemmas\", as \"the field's own question, asked by another body\" and as useful because the census's pending list does not yet hold it; the Barna figures and the tech companies' engagement with religious leaders it reads as the cards' (Capture Registry, 2026-10-31). Wikipedia has no article \"AI and Faith\" (HTTP 404: \"Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name\") and cites the network in four articles: Kenneth Cukier sits \"on the expert advisory committee of\" AIandFaith.org, \"a nonprofit organization of theologians and technologists\"; Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad's article cites \"AI and Faith Announces Five New Founding Experts\", dated October 2019; Jonathan D. Teubner's cites his AI and Faith member page; and Relationships 5.0 cites a review of the book published by AI and Faith in 2022 (Wikipedia).", "rail": [], "note": "L(B âˆȘ A) in the equal-terms case (v0.9 §0.4), realized as the knowledge object (objects.KO); its rail is the compression’s, by lineage." } }, "field": [ { "id": "B1", "card": "AI and Faith — Home - AI and Faith", "fetched": "card; census copy ai-and-faith--home, sha256 e76f31e524d6e3c3, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T02:52:11Z; refetched 2026-10-31T04:39:36Z HTTP 200 (sha256 f4ad47a5547fc107), text identical", "origin": "card" }, { "id": "B2", "card": "LinkedIn — AI and Faith | LinkedIn", "fetched": "card; B2.html sha256 9b46b0b2319c1a77, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:40:10Z", "origin": "card" }, { "id": "B3", "card": "Harvard (Christianity & The Common Good) — the conference page ‘Imago Dei and the Algorithmic Society’, titled ‘Christianity and AI’", "fetched": "topic card, fetched for its sense; B3.html sha256 2ea3d417d8b56af2, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:37Z; not ledgered", "origin": "card (the topic)" }, { "id": "B4", "card": "Barna Group — ‘AI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians’", "fetched": "topic card, fetched for its sense; B4.html sha256 835977156eda9689, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:37Z; not ledgered", "origin": "card (the topic)" }, { "id": "B5", "card": "BYU News — ‘New research from BYU-led multi-institution consortium finds all major AI models ignore faith, religion in responses’", "fetched": "topic card, fetched for its sense; B5.html sha256 c03f9d45077f276e, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T04:39:50Z; not ledgered", "origin": "card (the topic)" }, { "id": "B6", "card": "Axios — ‘AI stumbles on questions of faith’", "fetched": "unreachable: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare block) at 2026-10-31T04:39:38Z with the honest agent; B6-try1.html sha256 8c3bdaaf68c7fa8f; not retried; snippet only", "origin": "card (the topic)" }, { "id": "B7", "card": "YouTube·WCCO - CBS Minnesota — Is AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...", "fetched": "video card: title only; not fetched", "origin": "card (the topic)" }, { "id": "B8", "card": "YouTube·MelVee Broadcasting Network — Faith and Technology In an AI Generation", "fetched": "video card: title only; not fetched", "origin": "card (the topic)" }, { "id": "B9", "card": "YouTube·Firstpost — The Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith | Vantage", "fetched": "video card: title only; not fetched", "origin": "card (the topic)" }, { "id": "B10", "card": "AI and Faith — About Us", "fetched": "own page; census copy ai-and-faith--about, sha256 9a6532fa95f32d93, HTTP 200 at 2026-10-31T02:52:45Z; refetched 2026-10-31T04:39:38Z, text identical", "origin": "own_page" }, { "id": "B11", "card": "Wikipedia — AI and Faith (no article)", "fetched": "no article: raw wikitext and rendered page HTTP 404 at 2026-10-31T04:39Z (also ‘AI and faith’, ‘AI and religion’, ‘Artificial intelligence and religion’); four citing articles fetched (wikitext HTTP 200), W2–W5", "origin": "wikipedia" } ], "field_claims": { "F1": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "home, opening", "quote": "AI and Faith brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation.", "claim": "its own definition: it brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": true, "const": true, "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F2": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Our Mission", "quote": "Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape technology responsibly in the age of artificial intelligence.", "claim": "its mission: empowering faith traditions, technologists and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance flourishing and dignity, and shape technology responsibly", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "mission and vision", "date": "2026-09-24 (the new mission and vision statements, as the home page dates them; page read 2026-10-30)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F3": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Our Vision (also B10, Our Vision)", "quote": "AI and Faith is a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations, working for a future in which artificial intelligence serves humankind under five strategic pillars.", "claim": "its vision: a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators and partner organizations, working for AI that serves humankind under five strategic pillars", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": true, "const": true, "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "date": "2026-09-24 (the new mission and vision statements, as the home page dates them; page read 2026-10-30)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; also verbatim on B10.txt", "instances": [ "B1", "B10" ] }, "F4": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Our Vision, the pillars (also B10)", "quote": "Wisdom and Human Formation 
 Education and Public Understanding 
 Interfaith Dialogue and Community 
 Research and Thought Leadership 
 Responsible Innovation", "claim": "the five strategic pillars: Wisdom and Human Formation; Education and Public Understanding; Interfaith Dialogue and Community; Research and Thought Leadership; Responsible Innovation", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": true, "lineage": "the five strategic pillars", "date": "2026-09-24 (the new mission and vision statements, as the home page dates them; page read 2026-10-30)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked; also verbatim on B10.txt", "instances": [ "B1", "B10" ] }, "F5": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "‘ancient wisdom’ ¶", "quote": "And for the 85 percent of the world’s population who claim a religious affiliation, these issues are deeply spiritual as well. AI and Faith believes the world’s religions offer ancient wisdom that should guide the development and use of AI technology in contemporary society.", "claim": "its premise: for the 85 percent of the world’s population with a religious affiliation the issues are spiritual; the world’s religions offer ancient wisdom that should guide AI’s development and use", "modality": "interpretation", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the premise: ancient wisdom to guide AI", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F6": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "‘So we bring people together’ ¶", "quote": "We encourage, connect and equip tech creators, academic researchers, ethicists, theologians and other related professionals to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies. We want to shape the discussion in ways that are deeply thoughtful and life-affirming.", "claim": "its method: encouraging, connecting and equipping tech creators, researchers, ethicists and theologians to engage the moral and ethical issues around AI", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the network’s people", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F7": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Focus Areas", "quote": "AI and Faith seeks to apply values important in the world of faith to essential questions emerging from the development of new forms of intelligence.", "claim": "its focus areas: values important in the world of faith applied to questions from the development of new forms of intelligence", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the premise: ancient wisdom to guide AI", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F8": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "navigation (Content, Events, Strategic Projects)", "quote": "Content 
 Podcast 
 Articles & News 
 Newsletters 
 Research 
 Events 
 Strategic Projects 
 Faithful AI: Stories of Hope from 2045 
 Misinformation Hub", "claim": "what it publishes: a podcast, articles and news, newsletters, research, events; strategic projects including ‘Faithful AI: Stories of Hope from 2045’ and a Misinformation Hub", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what it publishes", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked" }, "F9": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Resources, By Faith Traditions", "quote": "By Faith Traditions 
 Buddhism 
 Evangelical Christian 
 Islam 
 Judaism 
 Mainline Protestant Christian 
 Roman Catholicism", "claim": "its resources by faith tradition: Buddhism, Evangelical Christian, Islam, Judaism, Mainline Protestant Christian, Roman Catholicism", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "faith traditions", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked" }, "F10": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Donate", "quote": "Donate here to make a tax deductible gift to support AI and Faith’s mission and work.", "claim": "gifts to it are tax deductible", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F11": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "quoted article (unnamed on the page)", "quote": "At a basic level, the goal of AI and Faith
is to inject a kind of humility and historicity into an industry that has often rejected them both
It is also a deeply humanistic project", "claim": "an article the page quotes: its goal is to inject humility and historicity into an industry that has often rejected them; a humanistic project", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "interpretation", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the premise: ancient wisdom to guide AI", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F12": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Read Our Latest Content", "quote": "AI and Faith Announces New Mission and Vision Statements 
 September 24, 2026 
 by Greg Cootsona", "claim": "the new mission and vision statements announced 24 September 2026 (Greg Cootsona)", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "lifecycle and versions", "date": "2026-09-24", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked" }, "F13": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "Read Our Latest Content, first item", "quote": "AI and Ethics of Healthcare #75 
 October 29, 2026", "claim": "its latest content: podcast episode #75, 29 October 2026", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "lifecycle and versions", "date": "2026-10-29", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked" }, "F14": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "footer (also B10, footer)", "quote": "AI and Faith is a pluralist organization seeking to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence.", "claim": "a pluralist organization engaging the moral and ethical issues around AI", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; also verbatim on B10.txt", "instances": [ "B1", "B10" ] }, "F15": { "source": "B1", "origin": "card", "locus": "footer (also B10, footer)", "quote": "Copyright © 2026 AI and Faith, All rights reserved.", "claim": "its pages: copyright 2026 AI and Faith, all rights reserved", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B1.txt (sha256 90827b72d6ff8cb7
), whitespace-normalised; also verbatim on B10.txt", "instances": [ "B1", "B10" ] }, "F16": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "About Us ¶1", "quote": "At AI and Faith, we envision a world where the effects of technology are exclusively life-affirming, promoting the dignity and wellbeing of all humans and improving their interactions through meaningful community and a just society.", "claim": "the world it envisions: technology’s effects exclusively life-affirming, promoting the dignity and wellbeing of all humans", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "mission and vision", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F17": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "About Us ¶2", "quote": "As a result, we encourage, connect and equip people to bring the fundamental values of the world’s major religions into the emerging debates about the ethical development of AI-related technologies.", "claim": "its work: bringing the fundamental values of the world’s major religions into debates about the ethical development of AI", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "the premise: ancient wisdom to guide AI", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F18": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "Experts of AI and Faith", "quote": "At its core, AI and Faith is people – a diverse community composed of experts in business, ethics, theology, and technology from a wide variety of business, religious, and academic institutions.", "claim": "at its core it is people: experts in business, ethics, theology and technology from business, religious and academic institutions", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "the network’s people", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F19": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "Meet Our Experts: Research Fellows", "quote": "Research Fellows explore the practical relevance of “ancient wisdom” to the AI ethics discussion 
 Immediate goals are to help organize the global discussion of faith perspectives on AI by 1) defining issues of relevance; 2) tracking research on faith perspectives on AI; and 3) connecting researchers across the landscape of such faith perspectives.", "claim": "its Research Fellows: the practical relevance of ‘ancient wisdom’ to AI ethics; goals of defining issues, tracking research on faith perspectives on AI, connecting researchers", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the network’s people", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked" }, "F20": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "Meet Our Experts: Contributing Fellows", "quote": "Our Contributing Fellows and Contributing Experts are deployed in four teams to promote our “Channel” into the broad AI ethics debate.", "claim": "Contributing Fellows and Experts in four teams (editorial, programs, networking, media/tech)", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the network’s people", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F21": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "Meet Our Experts: Networking Team", "quote": "Our Networking Team builds on the connections of our current experts, promotes mutual programming opportunities with our Partners, and carries forward our “network of networks” approach to promoting the global conversation on faith perspectives on AI.", "claim": "a ‘network of networks’ approach with its partners", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "partners and the network of networks", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F22": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "Board of Directors", "quote": "Board of Directors 
 Rabbi Harris Bor, Phd 
 David Brenner 
 Mark Graves, PhD 
 Rev. Mark Labberton, PhD 
 Lewis McMurran 
 David W. Miller, PhD 
 Brenda Ng 
 Thomas Osborn 
 Rabbi Daniel Weiner", "claim": "its Board of Directors, nine members", "modality": "documented", "kind": "attribution", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the network’s people", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked" }, "F23": { "source": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "locus": "About Us, fields", "quote": "Year Established 
 Products 
 Team Size 
 Clients", "claim": "the About page carries the field labels Year Established, Products, Team Size and Clients with no values", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-30, census copy; refetched 2026-10-31, text identical)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B10.txt (sha256 b8b5789059a2613c
), whitespace-normalised; multi-part quote, each part checked" }, "F24": { "source": "B2", "origin": "card", "locus": "About us s1", "quote": "AI and Faith is a pluralist organization bringing together technology creators, academic researchers, ethicists, theologians and related professionals to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies.", "claim": "LinkedIn: a pluralist organization bringing together technology creators, researchers, ethicists, theologians and related professionals on the moral and ethical issues around AI", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "definition", "kernel": true, "const": true, "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B2.txt (sha256 3a5ff20ece1d4f77
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F25": { "source": "B2", "origin": "card", "locus": "About us s2", "quote": "We exist to help shape this discussion in a deeply thoughtful and life-affirming way, focusing on the flourishing of humanity in a world of technology while also working to protect and promote human dignity, social justice and liberty.", "claim": "LinkedIn: to shape the discussion life-affirmingly, for human flourishing, dignity, social justice and liberty", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "mission and vision", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B2.txt (sha256 3a5ff20ece1d4f77
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F26": { "source": "B2", "origin": "card", "locus": "About us s3", "quote": "Through this work, we aim to connect, encourage, and equip those employed in the technology sector, the global faith community and AI influencers with experts in the fields of AI technology, research, ethics and religion through our membership network.", "claim": "LinkedIn: connecting the technology sector, the global faith community and AI influencers with experts through a membership network", "modality": "stipulation", "kind": "function", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the network’s people", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B2.txt (sha256 3a5ff20ece1d4f77
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F27": { "source": "B2", "origin": "card", "locus": "page facts", "quote": "Industry Civic and Social Organizations Company size 2-10 employees Headquarters Seattle, WA Type Nonprofit", "claim": "LinkedIn: Civic and Social Organizations; 2-10 employees; headquarters Seattle, WA; type Nonprofit", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B2.txt (sha256 3a5ff20ece1d4f77
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F28": { "source": "B2", "origin": "card", "locus": "header", "quote": "Seattle, WA 2,767 followers Follow View all 39 employees", "claim": "LinkedIn: 2,767 followers; ‘View all 39 employees’", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B2.txt (sha256 3a5ff20ece1d4f77
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F29": { "source": "B2", "origin": "card", "locus": "Specialties", "quote": "Specialties artificial intelligence, ethics, theology, morality, technology, data, faith, nonprofits, and philosophy", "claim": "LinkedIn specialties: artificial intelligence, ethics, theology, morality, technology, data, faith, nonprofits, philosophy", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B2.txt (sha256 3a5ff20ece1d4f77
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F30": { "source": "B2", "origin": "card", "locus": "Updates (reposted from the Institute for Security and Technology)", "quote": "Over the last year, IST and AI and Faith have worked with religious scholars, educators, and organizations to develop a curriculum for local communities that tackles hard ethical questions from a faith-based perspective and empowers local communities to lead thoughtful conversations on AI ethics and policy.", "claim": "IST’s post, reposted: IST and AI and Faith developed a curriculum with religious scholars and educators for local (Muslim) communities on AI ethics from a faith-based perspective", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "partners and the network of networks", "date": "undated page (read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B2.txt (sha256 3a5ff20ece1d4f77
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F31": { "source": "B11", "origin": "wikipedia", "locus": "W1.html (rendered https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_and_Faith, HTTP 404)", "quote": "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name", "claim": "no Wikipedia article ‘AI and Faith’ (raw wikitext and rendered page HTTP 404; also none at ‘AI and faith’, ‘AI and religion’, ‘Artificial intelligence and religion’)", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "date": "2026-10-31 (fetched)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text W1.html (sha256 d09f32adb0f0c714
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F32": { "source": "B11", "origin": "wikipedia", "locus": "W2 ‘Kenneth Cukier’, wikitext l.36", "quote": "He is on the expert advisory committee of [http://AIandFaith.org AIandFaith.org], a nonprofit organization of theologians and technologists.", "claim": "Wikipedia (Kenneth Cukier): on the expert advisory committee of AIandFaith.org, a nonprofit organization of theologians and technologists", "modality": "attributed", "kind": "attribution", "kernel": true, "const": false, "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "date": "undated (article read 2026-10-31)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text W2-Kenneth_Cukier.wiki (sha256 90fc7b0a8b7c7779
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F33": { "source": "B11", "origin": "wikipedia", "locus": "W3 ‘Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad’, wikitext l.60 (ref aifaith)", "quote": "{{cite web |title=AI and Faith Announces Five New Founding Experts |date=October 2019 |url=https://aiandfaith.org/news/ai-and-faith-announces-five-new-founding-members/ |publisher=AI and Faith", "claim": "Wikipedia (Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad) cites AI and Faith’s announcement of five new founding experts, October 2019", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "date": "2019-10 (the cited announcement)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text W3-Muhammad_Aurangzeb_Ahmad.wiki (sha256 7f4ed1965bfb4a3e
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F34": { "source": "B11", "origin": "wikipedia", "locus": "W4 ‘Jonathan D. Teubner’, wikitext l.13", "quote": "{{Cite web |title=Jonathan Teubner |url=https://aiandfaith.org/member/jonathan-teubner/ |access-date=2026-03-03 |website=AI and Faith", "claim": "Wikipedia (Jonathan D. Teubner) cites his AI and Faith member page", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "date": "2026-03-03 (access date)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text W4-Jonathan_D._Teubner.wiki (sha256 bf324838263de375
), whitespace-normalised" }, "F35": { "source": "B11", "origin": "wikipedia", "locus": "W5 ‘Relationships 5.0’, wikitext l.36", "quote": "|title=A Review of Elyakim Kislev's Relationships 5.0: How AI, VR, and Robots Will Reshape Our Emotional Lives |url=https://aiandfaith.org/a-review-of-elyakim-kislevs-relationships-5-0/ |website=AI and Faith", "claim": "Wikipedia (Relationships 5.0) cites a review of the book published by AI and Faith (2022-06-10)", "modality": "documented", "kind": "fact", "kernel": false, "const": false, "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "date": "2022-06-10 (the cited review)", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text W5-Relationships_5.0.wiki (sha256 5daa7b80652d918b
), whitespace-normalised" } }, "field_sources": { "B1": "AI and Faith — Home (card 1; the census’s own page ‘home’)", "B2": "LinkedIn — AI and Faith (card 2)", "B10": "AI and Faith — About Us (own page, census source ‘about’)", "B11": "Wikipedia — AI and Faith (no article; cited in four articles)" }, "delta": { "T_vs_LB": "At 'AI and Faith' (T1, nine cards; its words counted in objects.T) the composition gives the topic, and the entity once. Substituted reading: the composition's entity is the topic 'AI and faith' (T1-1, 'The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.'), surveyed from the cards of other bodies (B3–B9: Barna, Harvard, BYU's consortium, Axios, three videos), with the entity one bullet (T1-8) under 'Collaborative and Pluralist Frameworks' (CAP-1-01, CAP-1-02, CAP-1-09, CAP-1-12). Of the entity's own cards (B1, B2: 22 field claims) T composes five, at a coarse grain: the network's members (F3, as 'faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars', without communities, educators and partner organizations; CAP-1-03), its premise (F5, 'ancient wisdom' guiding AI, as 'apply ancient religious wisdom'), dignity from its mission (F2), one pillar by name (F4, 'Responsible Innovation' as 'responsible innovation'), and 'nonprofit' (F27, LinkedIn; CAP-1-04). Available, not composed: its own definition (F1); 'pluralist' (F14, F24), present only in the section heading (CAP-1-14); four of the five pillars (F4); the traditions (F9; CAP-1-04); what it publishes, its misinformation hub (F8); its people and board (F6, F18–F22, F26); its partners and the IST curriculum (F21, F30); Seattle, its size, its specialties (F27–F29); the dated statements of 24 September 2026 (F12; CAP-1-15); its latest content (F13); the tax-deductible gifts, the empty founding field, its rights (F10, F23, F15); Wikipedia's absence and its four citations (F31–F35). Substituted reading within the bullet: 'modern AI governance' for the pages' 'the AI ethics conversation' and 'the ethical development of AI-related technologies' (F1, F17); 'governance' occurs on the pages only in a podcast title. Composed without attribution at a coarse grain: the bullet carries no marker and no person (CAP-1-11). Of the topic (delta.topic_alignment, from B3–B9, which are not ledgered): substituted reading (B4's stated trust composed as reliance, T1-2), assigned to another (B4's 30% of all U.S. adults given to younger demographics; the pastors' domain trust as trust in AI as spiritual authority, T1-3), a name and examples not the page's (B5, T1-6), and two bullets on no readable text (T1-5, T1-7). Content replaced by use: the closer (T1-10).", "T_vs_LB_reading": "v0.9 §0.5: the first diff is ontological. At the organisation's exact name T composes the topic its name is made of, and holds the organisation as one framework within it, beside a Harvard conference (T1-8, T1-9); the registry's analysis gives the mechanism as observed: 'An organisation named for its subject is composed as its subject' (CAP-1-09). Of the entity it keeps what makes it an instance of the topic (faith, ethicists, ancient wisdom, dignity, an innovation pillar) and leaves out what makes it this organisation (its own sentence of definition, its pluralism, its traditions, its people, its outputs, its place and its dates). The topic's own cards are composed at their figures and recomposed at their modality: trust becomes reliance, and one survey's base is reassigned.", "LB_vs_LBA": "Admission adds, in one claim space with the field's: the census's kind, intersection and evidence kind for the network (RF-04, RF-05, RF-06), its unit, method and access (RF-07, RF-09, RF-17), its text object and the tag 'NOT a single tradition' (RF-08, RF-22), what it answers and what it does not, with the tag 'NOT a measurement of AI systems’ handling of scripture' (RF-14, RF-15, RF-21), its unchecked research and absent limits (RF-29, RF-13), its relation to the Capture Registry and its role in the worked question (RF-27, RF-30, RF-31), the census frame with its correction and the stated absence of an intersection with Revelation First (RF-16, RF-32–RF-34); the archive's category for the measurement the network does not make, machine-mediated theological reception, with the first study the archive claims and its baseline (O832-01, O832-02, O202-01–O202-03), and capture operators applied to a religious community navigating AI-mediated content (O499-01); and the composition at the name (CAP-1-01–CAP-1-16, RF-28). One field claim stands beside an archive claim it does not match: the pages' 'All rights reserved' (F15) against the census's licence 'not stated' (RF-18), both composed (P_coh). The census's evidence and findings restate the own pages (RF-12, RF-23–RF-26 with F3, F4, F8, F9): one lineage each, the own page earliest. Not surfaced: the census record (no card cites it; CAP-1-16) and every deposit.", "alignment": { "T1_cards_claims": [ "F1", "F2", "F3", "F4", "F5", "F6", "F7", "F8", "F9", "F10", "F11", "F12", "F13", "F14", "F15", "F24", "F25", "F26", "F27", "F28", "F29", "F30" ], "T1_composed": [ "F3", "F5", "F2", "F4", "F27" ], "T1_outside_cards": [ "T1-1: the topic’s frame (no source states it; the cards of the topic share its subject)", "T1-5: tech companies’ engagement with religious leaders (on no fetched card; B9 title only)", "T1-7: Herzfeld’s critique (B7 title only)", "'modern AI governance' in T1-8 (no field source states it of the entity)", "T1-10: the closer" ], "rule": "a field claim counts as composed when T states it at its source’s grain or coarser; the typology of what is not is in T_vs_LB (§6.2)" }, "substitution": { "composition_entity": "the topic ‘AI and faith’ (the intersection of AI and religion at large), which is not an entity", "E_F_composed": "one bullet (T1-8): the name, a coarse membership, the premise of ancient wisdom, dignity, one pillar, ‘nonprofit’; no definition of its own, no pluralism, no traditions, no people, no outputs, no place, no date", "basis": [ "CAP-1-01", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-12", "CAP-1-13" ] }, "topic_alignment": [ { "T": "T1-2", "cards": [ "B4" ], "spans": [ { "source": "B4", "quote": "Nearly three in five (61%) say they would completely or somewhat trust AI with achieving financial stability, and 56 percent say the same for mental and physical well-being.", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" }, { "source": "B4", "quote": "Nearly half say the same for growing spiritually (48%).", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" } ], "note": "substituted reading: the page’s figures are of stated trust (‘would completely or somewhat trust AI’); T composes them as use (‘Growing Reliance’, ‘increasingly turn to AI tools’); ‘general well-being’ for the page’s ‘mental and physical well-being’" }, { "T": "T1-3", "cards": [ "B4" ], "spans": [ { "source": "B4", "quote": "When asked whether spiritual advice from AI is just as trustworthy as advice from a pastor, nearly one in three U.S. adults (30%) agree.", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" }, { "source": "B4", "quote": "Among Gen Z, the share agreeing approaches two in five (39%); among Millennials, it climbs higher still (44%).", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" }, { "source": "B4", "quote": "Pastors’ trust in AI across these same domains cluster in the single digits to low teens: 12 percent for growing spiritually", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" } ], "note": "assigned to another: the 30% is all U.S. adults, which T gives to ‘younger demographics’ (‘Roughly 30% to 44% of younger demographics’); the pastors’ 6–12% is trust across personal domains, which T composes as trust ‘in AI as a spiritual authority’" }, { "T": "T1-4", "cards": [ "B4" ], "spans": [ { "source": "B4", "quote": "Among practicing Christians, that figure rises to 83 percent", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" }, { "source": "B4", "quote": "Seventy-two percent of practicing Christians are concerned about AI replacing the role of pastors or spiritual leaders", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" }, { "source": "B4", "quote": "Nearly two in three practicing Christians (65%) express concern about AI beginning to act as a replacement for God", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" }, { "source": "B4", "quote": "nearly three-quarters of practicing Christians (73%) express concern about people losing their religious faith because of AI.", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B4.txt" } ], "note": "composed at the page’s figures; the pastors’ figures (94%, 79%, 63%) and the survey’s bases (n=1,514, November 2025; pastors n=442) not composed" }, { "T": "T1-5", "cards": [], "spans": [], "note": "on no fetched card: B3–B5 do not state it; B6 (Axios) refused the agent (HTTP 403); the nearest is the Firstpost video’s title (B9, ‘The Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith’), title only" }, { "T": "T1-6", "cards": [ "B5", "B6" ], "spans": [ { "source": "B5", "quote": "Newly published research from The Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI) — a collaboration among researchers at BYU, Baylor University, the University of Notre Dame and Yeshiva University — found a consistent, repeatable pattern: religious perspectives are being left out of AI responses.", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B5.txt" }, { "source": "B5", "quote": "everyday situations about grief, love, loss, morality, and often AI does not bring religion into those conversations", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B5.txt" }, { "source": "B5", "quote": "The researchers have tested the benchmark on 14 different LLMs", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B5.txt" }, { "source": "B5", "quote": "Across all models, the biases were consistent and measurable:", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B5.txt" } ], "note": "the page names ‘The Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI’; T (with the Axios snippet) ‘for Evaluating’, and makes the consortium ‘include’ a multi-institution consortium that is itself; T’s examples ‘marriage, guilt, and depression’ are not on the page (‘grief, love, loss, morality’); ‘systematically omit or gloss over’ is not the page’s phrase" }, { "T": "T1-7", "cards": [ "B7" ], "spans": [], "note": "the WCCO video’s title only (B7, ‘Is AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...’): the critique’s content stands on no readable text" }, { "T": "T1-9", "cards": [ "B3" ], "spans": [ { "source": "B3", "quote": "This global conference brought together theologians, ethicists, technologists, and practitioners to explore the vital intersections between AI and Christian faith.", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B3.txt" }, { "source": "B3", "quote": "What does biblical faith tell us about our distinctively human capacities—our reasoning, creativity, relational nature, and spiritual capacity for meaning and transcendence?", "quote_ok": true, "checked_against": "saved text B3.txt" } ], "note": "composed at the page’s grain; the conference’s own title, ‘Imago Dei and the Algorithmic Society’, not composed" } ] }, "kernel": [ { "K": "K1", "claim": "`RF-01`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "none", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K2", "claim": "`RF-02`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "none", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K3", "claim": "`RF-03`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F3, F24)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K4", "claim": "`RF-04`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F1, F8)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K5", "claim": "`RF-05`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K6", "claim": "`RF-06`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K7", "claim": "`RF-23`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "none (restates F3: one lineage with the field’s claim)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K8", "claim": "`RF-11`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F27, F28: the size LinkedIn gives)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K9", "claim": "`RF-18`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "rival claim (F15: the pages’ ‘All rights reserved’)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K10", "claim": "`RF-10`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K11", "claim": "`RF-24`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the five strategic pillars", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "none (restates F4: one lineage with the field’s claim)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K12", "claim": "`RF-12`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the five strategic pillars", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "none (restates F4: one lineage with the field’s claim)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K13", "claim": "`RF-25`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "faith traditions", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "none (restates F9: one lineage with the field’s claim)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K14", "claim": "`RF-08`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "faith traditions", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F9)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K15", "claim": "`RF-22`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "faith traditions", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K16", "claim": "`RF-26`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "what it publishes", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "none (restates F8: one lineage with the field’s claim)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K17", "claim": "`RF-07`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "what it publishes", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F8)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K18", "claim": "`RF-09`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "what it publishes", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F8, F19)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K19", "claim": "`RF-17`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "what it publishes", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F8)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K20", "claim": "`RF-19`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "lifecycle and versions", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "qualified claim (F13)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K21", "claim": "`RF-20`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "lifecycle and versions", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K22", "claim": "`RF-14`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K23", "claim": "`RF-15`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K24", "claim": "`RF-21`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K25", "claim": "`RF-13`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K26", "claim": "`RF-29`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "self-description", "sense": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K27", "claim": "`RF-31`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K28", "claim": "`RF-30`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K29", "claim": "`RF-27`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "what it answers, and the measurement it does not make", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K30", "claim": "`RF-32`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K31", "claim": "`RF-33`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K32", "claim": "`RF-34`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K33", "claim": "`RF-16`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the census frame: AI and scripture, Revelation First", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K34", "claim": "`O832-01`", "source": "#832", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "machine-mediated theological reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K35", "claim": "`O202-01`", "source": "#202", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "machine-mediated theological reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K36", "claim": "`O832-02`", "source": "#832", "M_src": "self-description", "sense": "machine-mediated theological reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K37", "claim": "`O202-02`", "source": "#202", "M_src": "self-description", "sense": "machine-mediated theological reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K38", "claim": "`O202-03`", "source": "#202", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "machine-mediated theological reception", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K39", "claim": "`O499-01`", "source": "#499", "M_src": "self-description", "sense": "capture dynamics in a religious community navigating AI-mediated content", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K40", "claim": "`CAP-1-09`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K41", "claim": "`CAP-1-02`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K42", "claim": "`CAP-1-11`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K43", "claim": "`CAP-1-01`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K44", "claim": "`CAP-1-08`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K45", "claim": "`CAP-1-12`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "stipulation", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K46", "claim": "`CAP-1-13`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K47", "claim": "`CAP-1-03`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K48", "claim": "`CAP-1-04`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K49", "claim": "`CAP-1-14`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K50", "claim": "`CAP-1-15`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K51", "claim": "`CAP-1-16`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K52", "claim": "`RF-28`", "source": "Revelation First census record", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K53", "claim": "`CAP-1-05`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K54", "claim": "`CAP-1-06`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K55", "claim": "`CAP-1-10`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "interpretation", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" }, { "K": "K56", "claim": "`CAP-1-07`", "source": "Capture Registry", "M_src": "documented", "sense": "the composition at the name", "qualifiers carried": "—", "f (source's own falsifiers)": "— (none stated; watch: a later composition at the address that states or drops the claim, attributed or not, uptake §8.3)", "contrast": "missing distinction (the field has no claim on the point)", "resolver": "a later capture at 'AI and Faith' (ADDR-c7088a6b933e) on Google AI Overview, seated in the Capture Registry (§8.3)" } ], "kernel_T": [ { "claim": "F1", "note": "its own definition, on card 1’s page, absent" }, { "claim": "F14", "note": "‘pluralist organization’, on cards 1 and 2, absent but for the section heading" }, { "claim": "F4", "note": "four of the five pillars absent" }, { "claim": "F9", "note": "the traditions menu absent" }, { "claim": "F8", "note": "what it publishes, the misinformation hub, absent" }, { "claim": "F18", "note": "its people absent" }, { "claim": "F22", "note": "its board absent" }, { "claim": "F30", "note": "the IST curriculum, on card 2’s page, absent" }, { "claim": "F12", "note": "the dated statements of 24 September 2026 absent" }, { "claim": "F27", "note": "Seattle and its size absent; ‘nonprofit’ kept" }, { "claim": "F28", "note": "the page’s 39 employees against 2-10, absent" } ], "ledger": { "archive": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/ai-and-faith/ledger-archive.json", "field": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/ledgers/ai-and-faith/field.json", "selection": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/traversal/ai-and-faith/", "config": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/panel/configs/ai-and-faith.json", "intake": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/", "audit": null }, "ontology": { "composition": "equal", "composition_note": "equal-terms case (v0.9 §0.9, §4.1): one claim space; the field’s and the archive’s claims ordered together by the entity’s dependency and by genealogy within each sense; nothing translated; the topic ‘AI and faith’ kept apart from the entity", "case": { "value": "equal", "statement": "The archive reads the field’s entity as the entity. The Revelation First census record describes AI and Faith from the network’s own home and About pages, each evidence quote with its basis (‘operator’), and adds, on that object, its intersection, kind of evidence, answers, negative tags and relations; the deposits that bear on the entity’s class (AI and religion) supply a category for a measurement the network does not make, without contesting what the network is. No source of the field holds an ontology the archive contests, and the archive supplies none in its place: the equal-terms case (§0.9), one claim space, nothing translated.", "loci": [ { "dep": "RF", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'ai-and-faith'].evidence.self (basis 'operator', src ai-and-faith--about)", "quote": "AI and Faith is a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations, working for a future in which artificial intelligence serves humankind under five strategic pillars." }, { "dep": "RF", "locus": "census.json schema_note", "quote": "rf_intersection (where it meets the Revelation First workstreams: the archive's reading, kept apart from the resource's own terms)" }, { "dep": "RF", "locus": "census.json rows[slug == 'ai-and-faith'].does_not_answer[0]", "quote": "how AI systems in fact represent, cite or summarize scripture: no measurement in the saved pages" }, { "dep": 832, "locus": "Q&A (l.385)", "quote": "Q: What does \"machine-mediated theological reception\" mean? A: It means measuring how AI retrieval systems (Google AI Overview, ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) process, frame, attribute, and present a theological thesis." }, { "dep": 202, "locus": "§ Machine-Mediated Theological Reception", "quote": "The measurement itself is the contribution: the first study of how AI retrieval systems process contested religious scholarship." } ] }, "E_F": { "type": "C (public entity: a pluralist network and publication hub of faith leaders, scholars, technologists and ethicists on AI and religion; at the name, the topic at large)", "definition": "AI and Faith (aiandfaith.org), which \"brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation\" (B1): a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators and partner organizations under five strategic pillars (vision and mission of 24 September 2026; B1, B10), a pluralist organization of technology creators, researchers, ethicists and theologians (B1, B10, B2), Seattle-based and nonprofit by its LinkedIn page (B2), publishing a podcast, articles, newsletters, research and events, with resources by faith tradition and a misinformation hub (B1); no Wikipedia article, cited in four (B11)", "claims": [ "F1", "F3", "F4", "F2", "F12", "F14", "F24", "F27", "F8", "F9", "F31" ] }, "E_A": { "definition": "the same network, in the Revelation First census record and the archive’s deposits: a community or policy resource on AI and religion, filed at the census’s intersection AI and scripture, whose text object is faith traditions’ engagement with AI, which answers what faith communities and their scholars say about AI and makes no measurement of how AI systems represent, cite or summarize scripture (NOT a measurement; NOT a single tradition), with no stated intersection with the Revelation First thesis; the neighbour of the Capture Registry, which measures what AI answers say; and, at its name on 31 October 2026, a target absent from a composition of the topic, the network one bullet and its home page card 1. The archive defines the measurement the network does not make, machine-mediated theological reception (#832, #202).", "claims": [ "RF-04", "RF-05", "RF-06", "RF-08", "RF-14", "RF-15", "RF-21", "RF-22", "RF-16", "RF-27", "RF-30", "O832-01", "O202-01", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-09", "CAP-1-12" ], "defining_papers": [ 202, 832 ], "defining_records": [ "Revelation First census record (census.json rows[slug == 'ai-and-faith'], organizing_question, correction, intersections, schema_note; questions.json [id == 'ai-describes-rf']; rendered aggregators/ai-and-faith/index.html; editor Lee Sharks, compiled 2026-10-30, schema 'field census 1.0')", "Capture Registry ai-and-faith-aio-20261031 (OBS-4ba09939f09e)" ] }, "rho": { "value": "extends", "status": "read from the Revelation First census record, the capture record and the deposits that bear on the entity’s class (#202, #832, #499); no deposit names AI and Faith; the census takes the network from its own pages, each field with its basis ('operator'), and adds its reading (§1.2a)", "statement": "The archive reads AI and Faith as its own pages present it and adds, on the field’s own object: the census’s intersection and kind of evidence for it (AI and scripture; community or policy resource), what it answers and what it does not (no measurement of how AI systems handle scripture), its negative tags, its relation to the Capture Registry as neighbour, its place in the census’s worked question, its stated absence of an intersection with Revelation First; the archive’s category for the measurement the network does not make, machine-mediated theological reception, with its baseline (#832, #202), and an application of its capture operators to a religious community navigating AI-mediated content (#499); and the composition at the name, where the network is one bullet of a topic answer (Capture Registry).", "claims": [ "RF-05", "RF-06", "RF-14", "RF-15", "RF-21", "RF-22", "RF-27", "RF-30", "RF-16", "O832-01", "O832-02", "O202-01", "O202-02", "O202-03", "O499-01", "CAP-1-02", "CAP-1-09" ], "guard": "ρ = extends claims an addition and no more (§1.2a). It does not make the field’s sources wrong at their dates. The census’s licence field (RF-18, ‘not stated’) and the pages’ footer (F15, ‘All rights reserved’) are composed side by side under P_coh; the archive’s category of machine-mediated theological reception is composed as the archive’s, never as a measurement the network makes; the census’s rf_intersection and correction are the archive’s reading (RF-16, RF-34), never the field’s (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §7).", "considered": [ { "value": "constructs", "rejected": "the archive does not read the network as made by reception; its records take the network’s pages as its own account" }, { "value": "revises", "rejected": "the entity is not the archive’s own; the archive has no earlier statement of it to keep, narrow or withdraw" } ] }, "translation": [ { "lineage": "what it is: a pluralist network bringing the world’s religions to AI ethics", "field_claims": [ "F1", "F3", "F14", "F24", "F29" ], "received": "F1 (B1, home, opening): \"AI and Faith brings the wisdom of the world’s religions to the AI ethics conversation.\"; F3 (B1, Our Vision (also B10, Our Vision)): \"AI and Faith is a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations, working for a future in which artificial intelligence serves humankind under five strategic pillars.\"; F14 (B1, footer (also B10, footer)): \"AI and Faith is a pluralist organization seeking to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence.\"; F24 (B2, About us s1): \"AI and Faith is a pluralist organization bringing together technology creators, academic researchers, ethicists, theologians and related professionals to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies.\"; F29 (B2, Specialties): \"Specialties artificial intelligence, ethics, theology, morality, technology, data, faith, nonprofits, and philosophy\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside RF-01, RF-02, RF-03, RF-04, RF-23", "archive_claims": [ "RF-01", "RF-02", "RF-03", "RF-04", "RF-23" ] }, { "lineage": "mission and vision", "field_claims": [ "F2", "F16", "F25" ], "received": "F2 (B1, Our Mission): \"Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape technology responsibly in the age of artificial intelligence.\"; F16 (B10, About Us ¶1): \"At AI and Faith, we envision a world where the effects of technology are exclusively life-affirming, promoting the dignity and wellbeing of all humans and improving their interactions through meaningful community and a just society.\"; F25 (B2, About us s2): \"We exist to help shape this discussion in a deeply thoughtful and life-affirming way, focusing on the flourishing of humanity in a world of technology while also working to protect and promote human dignity, social justice and liberty.\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received (no archive claim in this lineage)", "archive_claims": [] }, { "lineage": "the five strategic pillars", "field_claims": [ "F4" ], "received": "F4 (B1, Our Vision, the pillars (also B10)): \"Wisdom and Human Formation 
 Education and Public Understanding 
 Interfaith Dialogue and Community 
 Research and Thought Leadership 
 Responsible Innovation\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside RF-12, RF-24", "archive_claims": [ "RF-12", "RF-24" ] }, { "lineage": "the premise: ancient wisdom to guide AI", "field_claims": [ "F5", "F7", "F11", "F17" ], "received": "F5 (B1, ‘ancient wisdom’ ¶): \"And for the 85 percent of the world’s population who claim a religious affiliation, these issues are deeply spiritual as well. AI and Faith believes the world’s religions offer ancient wisdom that should guide the development and use of AI technology in contemporary society.\"; F7 (B1, Focus Areas): \"AI and Faith seeks to apply values important in the world of faith to essential questions emerging from the development of new forms of intelligence.\"; F11 (B1, quoted article (unnamed on the page)): \"At a basic level, the goal of AI and Faith
is to inject a kind of humility and historicity into an industry that has often rejected them both
It is also a deeply humanistic project\"; F17 (B10, About Us ¶2): \"As a result, we encourage, connect and equip people to bring the fundamental values of the world’s major religions into the emerging debates about the ethical development of AI-related technologies.\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received (no archive claim in this lineage)", "archive_claims": [] }, { "lineage": "the network’s people", "field_claims": [ "F6", "F18", "F19", "F20", "F22", "F26" ], "received": "F6 (B1, ‘So we bring people together’ ¶): \"We encourage, connect and equip tech creators, academic researchers, ethicists, theologians and other related professionals to engage the world in the moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence and related technologies. We want to shape the discussion in ways that are deeply thoughtful and life-affirming.\"; F18 (B10, Experts of AI and Faith): \"At its core, AI and Faith is people – a diverse community composed of experts in business, ethics, theology, and technology from a wide variety of business, religious, and academic institutions.\"; F19 (B10, Meet Our Experts: Research Fellows): \"Research Fellows explore the practical relevance of “ancient wisdom” to the AI ethics discussion 
 Immediate goals are to help organize the global discussion of faith perspectives on AI by 1) defining issues of relevance; 2) tracking research on faith perspectives on AI; and 3) connecting researchers across the landscape of such faith perspectives.\"; F20 (B10, Meet Our Experts: Contributing Fellows): \"Our Contributing Fellows and Contributing Experts are deployed in four teams to promote our “Channel” into the broad AI ethics debate.\"; F22 (B10, Board of Directors): \"Board of Directors 
 Rabbi Harris Bor, Phd 
 David Brenner 
 Mark Graves, PhD 
 Rev. Mark Labberton, PhD 
 Lewis McMurran 
 David W. Miller, PhD 
 Brenda Ng 
 Thomas Osborn 
 Rabbi Daniel Weiner\"; F26 (B2, About us s3): \"Through this work, we aim to connect, encourage, and equip those employed in the technology sector, the global faith community and AI influencers with experts in the fields of AI technology, research, ethics and religion through our membership network.\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received (no archive claim in this lineage)", "archive_claims": [] }, { "lineage": "partners and the network of networks", "field_claims": [ "F21", "F30" ], "received": "F21 (B10, Meet Our Experts: Networking Team): \"Our Networking Team builds on the connections of our current experts, promotes mutual programming opportunities with our Partners, and carries forward our “network of networks” approach to promoting the global conversation on faith perspectives on AI.\"; F30 (B2, Updates (reposted from the Institute for Security and Technology)): \"Over the last year, IST and AI and Faith have worked with religious scholars, educators, and organizations to develop a curriculum for local communities that tackles hard ethical questions from a faith-based perspective and empowers local communities to lead thoughtful conversations on AI ethics and policy.\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received (no archive claim in this lineage)", "archive_claims": [] }, { "lineage": "faith traditions", "field_claims": [ "F9" ], "received": "F9 (B1, Resources, By Faith Traditions): \"By Faith Traditions 
 Buddhism 
 Evangelical Christian 
 Islam 
 Judaism 
 Mainline Protestant Christian 
 Roman Catholicism\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside RF-08, RF-22, RF-25", "archive_claims": [ "RF-08", "RF-22", "RF-25" ] }, { "lineage": "what it publishes", "field_claims": [ "F8" ], "received": "F8 (B1, navigation (Content, Events, Strategic Projects)): \"Content 
 Podcast 
 Articles & News 
 Newsletters 
 Research 
 Events 
 Strategic Projects 
 Faithful AI: Stories of Hope from 2045 
 Misinformation Hub\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside RF-07, RF-09, RF-17, RF-26", "archive_claims": [ "RF-07", "RF-09", "RF-17", "RF-26" ] }, { "lineage": "the organisation: status, size, place, rights", "field_claims": [ "F10", "F15", "F23", "F27", "F28" ], "received": "F10 (B1, Donate): \"Donate here to make a tax deductible gift to support AI and Faith’s mission and work.\"; F15 (B1, footer (also B10, footer)): \"Copyright © 2026 AI and Faith, All rights reserved.\"; F23 (B10, About Us, fields): \"Year Established 
 Products 
 Team Size 
 Clients\"; F27 (B2, page facts): \"Industry Civic and Social Organizations Company size 2-10 employees Headquarters Seattle, WA Type Nonprofit\"; F28 (B2, header): \"Seattle, WA 2,767 followers Follow View all 39 employees\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside RF-10, RF-11, RF-18", "archive_claims": [ "RF-10", "RF-11", "RF-18" ] }, { "lineage": "lifecycle and versions", "field_claims": [ "F12", "F13" ], "received": "F12 (B1, Read Our Latest Content): \"AI and Faith Announces New Mission and Vision Statements 
 September 24, 2026 
 by Greg Cootsona\"; F13 (B1, Read Our Latest Content, first item): \"AI and Ethics of Healthcare #75 
 October 29, 2026\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received beside RF-19, RF-20", "archive_claims": [ "RF-19", "RF-20" ] }, { "lineage": "reception: Wikipedia", "field_claims": [ "F31", "F32", "F33", "F34", "F35" ], "received": "F31 (B11, W1.html (rendered https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_and_Faith, HTTP 404)): \"Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name\"; F32 (B11, W2 ‘Kenneth Cukier’, wikitext l.36): \"He is on the expert advisory committee of [http://AIandFaith.org AIandFaith.org], a nonprofit organization of theologians and technologists.\"; F33 (B11, W3 ‘Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad’, wikitext l.60 (ref aifaith)): \"{{cite web |title=AI and Faith Announces Five New Founding Experts |date=October 2019 |url=https://aiandfaith.org/news/ai-and-faith-announces-five-new-founding-members/ |publisher=AI and Faith\"; F34 (B11, W4 ‘Jonathan D. Teubner’, wikitext l.13): \"{{Cite web |title=Jonathan Teubner |url=https://aiandfaith.org/member/jonathan-teubner/ |access-date=2026-03-03 |website=AI and Faith\"; F35 (B11, W5 ‘Relationships 5.0’, wikitext l.36): \"|title=A Review of Elyakim Kislev's Relationships 5.0: How AI, VR, and Robots Will Reshape Our Emotional Lives |url=https://aiandfaith.org/a-review-of-elyakim-kislevs-relationships-5-0/ |website=AI and Faith\"", "receiving_text": "—", "translation": "untranslated: composed as received (no archive claim in this lineage)", "archive_claims": [] } ], "receiving_texts": "equal-terms case: every field claim composed as received, beside the archive claims it stands with" }, "measure": { "rule": "v0.9 §4.10: KO_B sentences surviving in the KO at similarity ≄ 0.95, with positions (computed as apply_v09.py does: difflib.SequenceMatcher ratio, the best KO sentence for each KO_B sentence)", "v0.9": { "surviving": 0, "of": 9, "positions": [ null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null ] }, "opening_run": { "rule": "v0.9 §5.10 (equal-terms case): the field-only KO's sentences as the KO's opening run in their own order", "breach": false }, "blocks": { "rule": "v0.9 §4.1 (equal-terms and mixed cases): the KO does not open with the field as a block or close with the archive as one; sentences typed by the ledgers of the claims they cite (F field-only, A archive-only, M both)", "sequence": "MMFMFMFFMFFFMMMAAAAAAMMAF", "field_only_head": 0, "archive_only_tail": 0, "breach": false, "note": "the archive-only tail (0 sentences) is the composition at the name and its reception record, the capture’s own sense; the field’s last lineage (Wikipedia) closes the KO, so the archive is not composed as a closing block" }, "max_similarity": [ 0.093, 0.536, 0.133, 0.181, 0.107, 0.453, 0.178, 0.229, 0.229 ], "ko_sentence_1_max_similarity_to_KO_B": 0.249 }, "homonyms": { "names": [ "the topic ‘AI and faith’ (the intersection of artificial intelligence and religion at large; lower-case in common use): not an entity; the composition at the name gives it (T1-1–T1-7, T1-9; CAP-1-01, CAP-1-09, CAP-1-12)" ], "basis": "The address is the organisation’s exact name, which is also the topic’s; the composition reads it as the topic and sets the organisation as one bullet (CAP-1-02). Per BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5 the topic is recorded in the delta as a generic composition, not as a homonym entity; the bodies on its cards are distinct entities.", "distinct_entities": [ "Barna Group (with Gloo, the State of the Church initiative): the survey ‘AI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians’ (B4)", "the Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI; BYU, Baylor, Notre Dame, Yeshiva) and its AllFaith Benchmark (B5; Axios B6); T and the Axios snippet name it ‘Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI’", "Harvard’s conference ‘Imago Dei and the Algorithmic Society’ (Christianity & The Common Good), carded as ‘Christianity and AI’ (B3)", "Noreen Herzfeld, theologian (B7, title only)", "the Institute for Security and Technology (IST), a partner (F30)", "the Crimson Hexagonal Archive’s Capture Registry, the census’s neighbour (RF-27)" ], "substitutes": { "T1": [ "the topic composed as the answer at the organisation’s name: T1-1 ‘The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.’, with T1-2–T1-7 and T1-9; the entity one bullet (T1-8)" ] }, "register": { "address_1": { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "obs_id": "OBS-4ba09939f09e" } } }, "notes": [ "One address, Google AI Overview (expanded), signed out, incognito, 2026-10-31 (received 00:04 EDT): ai-and-faith-aio-20261031 (OBS-4ba09939f09e, ADDR-c7088a6b933e, AXN:0B31.CAPTURE.🕒🕘🌅đŸŒčđŸȘâ–¶ïž), nine cards. A NEW address; the census record was built the day before and no card cites it (CAP-1-16). PER-dim: reached ‘generic’, gate target_absent (PER 1.0; 0.231 beneath the gate).", "The generic case (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5). At the name the composition gives the topic at large; the organisation is one bullet and its home page card 1. The field B for the entity is card 1 (B1, the census’s own page ‘home’), card 2 (B2, LinkedIn), the census’s other own page (B10, About Us) and Wikipedia (B11: no article; four citing articles). Cards 3–9 (B3–B9) concern other bodies and are recorded as the field’s account of the topic, each with its sense; B3, B4 and B5 were fetched to read that sense and the spans T composes from them (delta.topic_alignment); none names the entity; they are not ledgered.", "Fetching: every reachable page fetched with curl and the census’s agent string ‘alexanarch-seating/1.0 (https://www.alexanarch.org)’ on 2026-10-31 between 04:39 and 04:41 UTC, raw and text with sha256 in field.json. B1 and B10 are the census’s saved copies (sha256 = manifest); both refetched once: raw bytes differ, extracted text identical. Card URLs for B3–B6 found by WebSearch on title and site; the LinkedIn URL taken from the home page’s own link after a guessed slug returned 404 (B2-try1.html). The BYU News card’s title resolves to science.byu.edu; news.byu.edu at the same slug returned HTTP 404.", "Unreachable: B6, Axios: HTTP 403, a Cloudflare block page, saved (B6-try1.html) and not retried with another agent or route; its snippet stands. Videos (B7–B9): title only, not fetched. No other source refused the agent.", "Card snippets not on their pages, recorded and not resolved: B1’s snippet gives the mission as ‘
 shape AI responsibly. Vis...’, the page ‘shape technology responsibly in the age of artificial intelligence’ (F2); B2’s snippet gives 2,751 followers, the page 2,767 (F28).", "The archive subset: no archive text names AI and Faith or aiandfaith (D 0, R 0). The O-class string pass on the census’s kind for the entity (AI and religion, sourced by B1, B10, B2) returned 35 sentences in 17 texts, all read: admitted #202 (§ Machine-Mediated Theological Reception: the measured instance, the first study, the baseline), #832 (the work plan: the category defined in its Q&A, and the measurement as the first longitudinal study; versions #1211, #1216, #1217, #1400 and #1403 are instances of one work, grouped under S4) and #499 (capture operators sound in ‘a religious community navigating AI-mediated content’). #1025 carries #202’s section verbatim (one work). Rejected: #119 (‘spiritual practitioner’ in a list of practitioners), #497/#1150 (a theological coda in a list of Grok themes), #524 (biblical theology among the Hexagon’s traditions), #641 (political theology among compression domains), #834/#1228 (AIO’s use of the archive’s vocabulary, not the class), #847/#1032 (captures of Revelation First, the archive’s own thesis). The hop from #202, #499 and #832 (37 candidates) was screened for class sentences and read where any matched: none admitted (#928’s ‘the shape of a religion’ is the archive’s own architecture; #830, the baseline document, is the source of #202’s baseline lineage, carried through O202-03).", "The archive’s work on the field (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §7): the Revelation First thesis (#202) concerns the composition order of the New Testament; it bears on this entity only through its section on machine-mediated theological reception, which applies the archive’s category to the class. The census’s intersection for the entity, ai-scripture, is stated by no field source for it (classes_note), so it enters as the census’s reading (RF-05, RF-33), never as a class of the pass. The census’s rf_intersection (‘none stated’, RF-16) and correction (RF-34) are ledgered as the archive’s reading and composed as the census’s.", "Neighbour row: datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/rows/book-of-revelation.json bears through #202’s baseline (the composition layer correcting the user that Revelation is the last book, O202-03), a machine composition of the text the field is organized around; not edited. sappho-31.json: no bearing found.", "Defects and findings for the Revelation First census record (reported, not fixed): (a) license ‘not stated’ (RF-18), while both saved pages carry ‘Copyright © 2026 AI and Faith, All rights reserved.’ (F15): the pages state a rights reservation, not an open licence. (b) The record does not carry the dates its sources give: the mission and vision statements it quotes as evidence.self were announced 24 September 2026 (F12), which the lifecycle and version_and_time fields omit. (c) Dates: version_and_time.read and observed.on are 2026-10-30, while sources[*].read and the manifest give 2026-10-31 (02:52 UTC, the evening of 30 October in EDT). (d) Not in the record and stated by LinkedIn: Seattle, nonprofit, 2-10 employees with 39 shown (F27, F28). No census field is contradicted by the saved own pages other than (a).", "Findings of the capture checked against the field ledger (CAP-): findings[0], [1], the reading, the analysis and the PER note agree with the ledger. (1) findings[3] says the claim that major tech companies ‘have actively engaged with religious leaders’ is ‘the cards’’: no fetched card states it (B3, B4, B5 read; B6 refused; B7–B9 title only, the nearest Firstpost’s title), so the ledger cannot confirm it. (2) findings[2] names the ‘Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI’, the composition’s and the Axios snippet’s name; the BYU page names ‘The Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI’, and does not use the phrase ‘systematically omit or gloss over’ the registry quotes from T. (3) per_dim.read.on is ‘2026-10-29’, two days before the capture (2026-10-31). (4) The BYU News card resolves to science.byu.edu, not news.byu.edu.", "Ledgers unaudited (§3.8: one extractor). Field quotes 35/35 and archive quotes 56/56 verified by script against the saved texts, census.json, questions.json, the registry and the deposit texts; topic-alignment spans 15/15 against B3–B5." ], "composition_v09": { "source": "this row (composed directly; no rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v09/ai-and-faith.json)", "composer": "Claude (Opus 5.5), subagent, 2026-10-31", "defining_material_read": [ { "what": "Revelation First census record, row", "file": "/home/claude/fleet/revelationfirst-com/data/rf-census/census.json (rows[slug == 'ai-and-faith'], organizing_question, correction, intersections, schema_note, evidence_kinds, pending, unread_sources)", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "Revelation First worked questions", "file": "/home/claude/fleet/revelationfirst-com/data/rf-census/questions.json", "read": "the one question that names the entity (ai-describes-rf)" }, { "what": "census sources", "file": "/home/claude/fleet/revelationfirst-com/data/rf-census/sources/ai-and-faith--home.*, ai-and-faith--about.*, manifest.json", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "Capture Registry entry", "file": "data/EA-WG-CAPTURES-01.json (ai-and-faith-aio-20261031)", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "#202 Revelation First ≠ Revelation Early", "file": "data/texts/AXN-0349-text.md", "read": "whole" }, { "what": "#832 Revelation First: A Work Plan for Retrieval-Layer Theological Reception (v7.1)", "file": "data/texts/AXN-034D-text.md", "read": "the sections bearing on machine-mediated theological reception (header, ‘If successful’ ¶, the Q&A, the measurement and method papers M-1, M-2), not whole: 141 KB" }, { "what": "#499 Autonomous Semantic Warfare", "file": "data/texts/AXN-013E-text.md", "read": "the paragraph of the candidate and its neighbours (468 KB; not whole)" }, { "what": "specification and briefs", "file": "data/texts/AXN-0700-text.md §0–§6, §10–§11, Appendix A; rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v09/BRIEF.md, BRIEF-NEW-ROW-AGGREGATOR.md, BRIEF-NEW-ROW-PROVENANCE.md, BRIEF-NEW-ROW-LABOR.md, BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD.md", "read": "the sections named" }, { "what": "exemplar row", "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/rows/stanford-canaries.json (with its ledgers, config and reading)", "read": "structure and the sections mirrored" } ], "cuts": [], "notes": "equal case; KO 25 sentences, all 35 field and 56 archive claims cited; P body 330 words; KO_B 9 sentences, 0 surviving at ≄ 0.95" }, "field_by_origin": { "cards": [ "B1", "B2" ], "topic_cards": [ "B3", "B4", "B5", "B6", "B7", "B8", "B9" ], "own_pages": [ "B10" ], "wikipedia": [ "B11" ], "census_third_party": [], "unreachable": [ "B6" ], "title_only": [ "B7", "B8", "B9" ], "topic_note": "BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5: at ‘AI and Faith’ the composition gives the topic at large; the organisation is one bullet and its home page card 1. The topic is not an entity: the cards that concern other bodies (Barna, Harvard, BYU’s consortium, Axios, three videos) are recorded as the field’s account of the topic, each with its sense, and are not ledgered; the generic composition is in delta.substitution and delta.topic_alignment. The field B for the entity is cards 1–2, its own page and Wikipedia.", "wikipedia_state": "no article: ‘AI and Faith’, ‘AI and faith’, ‘AI and religion’ and ‘Artificial intelligence and religion’ all absent (raw wikitext HTTP 404; rendered page HTTP 404, ‘Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name’), no redirect; the network is cited in four articles (Kenneth Cukier, Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad, Jonathan D. Teubner, Relationships 5.0), ledgered F32–F35", "sources": [ { "id": "B1", "origin": "card", "role": "Overview card 1 (the entity’s card: its home page)", "card": "AI and Faith — Home - AI and Faith", "url": "https://aiandfaith.org/", "kind": "Overview card; the entity’s home page, which is the census’s own page ai-and-faith--home", "files": { "B1.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B1.html", "sha256": "e76f31e524d6e3c3437e5e855123c22e30f5ae708f631fe9155e772cc73d48d8" }, "B1.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B1.txt", "sha256": "90827b72d6ff8cb762ddc25876f456ced835b44ed67e53ba5c8ca18bd900aa61" }, "B1-refetch.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B1-refetch.html", "sha256": "f4ad47a5547fc1079ca9557b7ebe3b5b7ddf3905f4f5ba18306c9ad16e38061b" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:36Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://aiandfaith.org/", "raw": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B1-refetch.html", "raw_sha256": "f4ad47a5547fc1079ca9557b7ebe3b5b7ddf3905f4f5ba18306c9ad16e38061b", "census_copy": "ai-and-faith--home", "census_sha256": "e76f31e524d6e3c3437e5e855123c22e30f5ae708f631fe9155e772cc73d48d8", "census_fetched": "2026-10-31T02:52:11Z", "census_read": "2026-10-31 (manifest; the record’s version_and_time.read is 2026-10-30)", "agrees": "text identical (7,239 characters after stripping scripts, styles and tags, both copies); the raw bytes differ (per-request tokens), so the census copy is carried as B1.html with the census’s text as B1.txt", "text": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B1.txt" ] }, "names_operator": "yes (AI and Faith, by name, throughout; board members on B10)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "Card 1 is the entity’s home page, the census’s own page ‘home’: carried once, as a card (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §3; as stanford-canaries B1). The card’s snippet (‘Mission: 
 shape AI responsibly. Vis...’) is not the page’s words: the page’s mission reads ‘shape technology responsibly in the age of artificial intelligence’ (F2); recorded, not resolved.", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 1 } ], "card_title": "Home - AI and Faith", "card_snippet": "Mission: Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape AI responsibly. Vis...", "card_note": null }, { "id": "B2", "origin": "card", "role": "Overview card 2 (the entity’s LinkedIn page)", "card": "LinkedIn — AI and Faith | LinkedIn", "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/aiandfaith/", "kind": "Overview card; the entity’s LinkedIn company page (signed out view)", "files": { "B2.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B2.html", "sha256": "9b46b0b2319c1a7791a1b211ea401d8921c3c403b133a99d305321239ec7db3f" }, "B2.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B2.txt", "sha256": "3a5ff20ece1d4f7721284a57731b8c7ef91a19050c40c68c677d80beb15ecc6d" }, "B2-try1.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B2-try1.html", "sha256": "8f447ee2be2aa3e41252dfe0a24a87385e659fecc33970a39dc952dd767f6fba" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:40:10Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/aiandfaith/", "raw": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B2.html", "raw_sha256": "9b46b0b2319c1a7791a1b211ea401d8921c3c403b133a99d305321239ec7db3f", "text": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B2.txt" ], "tries": [ { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:37Z", "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/ai-and-faith", "http": 404, "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B2-try1.html", "note": "a guessed slug; the correct URL was then taken from the home page’s own LinkedIn link (B1.html: href https://www.linkedin.com/company/aiandfaith/)" } ] }, "names_operator": "yes (AI and Faith; one employee named, John C. Havens)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "The page states ‘Company size 2-10 employees’ and ‘View all 39 employees’ (F27, F28): recorded as the page gives them. The card’s snippet gives 2,751 followers; the page on 2026-10-31 gives 2,767.", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 2 } ], "card_title": "AI and Faith | LinkedIn", "card_snippet": "Organization: AI and Faith (Seattle, WA; Nonprofit; 2-10 employees; 2,751 followers). Mission: Pluralist organization uniting technology creators, academic rese...", "card_note": null }, { "id": "B3", "origin": "card (the topic)", "role": "Overview card 3 (the topic’s: another body)", "card": "Harvard (Christianity & The Common Good) — the conference page ‘Imago Dei and the Algorithmic Society’, titled ‘Christianity and AI’", "url": "https://ccg.fas.harvard.edu/conference-pages/christianity-and-ai", "kind": "Overview card of the topic ‘AI and faith’ at large", "sense": "the topic: a Harvard conference on Christianity and AI (Imago Dei and the Algorithmic Society)", "files": { "B3.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B3.html", "sha256": "2ea3d417d8b56af260c355f70df9f92c720999d0a96fb3c5103880e0ad66c604" }, "B3.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B3.txt", "sha256": "a6fd5b651336209a89b4a14d9d5a9028c620b0febf928cb23a4bd3e29b7f75d8" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:37Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://ccg.fas.harvard.edu/conference-pages/christianity-and-ai", "raw": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B3.html", "raw_sha256": "2ea3d417d8b56af260c355f70df9f92c720999d0a96fb3c5103880e0ad66c604", "text": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B3.txt" ] }, "names_operator": "no (the entity is not named)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "URL by WebSearch on the card’s title and site; the page’s is the card’s (‘Christianity and AI’). It does not name AI and Faith (searched: ‘AI and Faith’, ‘aiandfaith’); Jonathan Teubner, whose Wikipedia article cites his AI and Faith member page (F34), is a speaker.", "ledgered": "no: a card of the topic, recorded with its sense as the field’s account of the topic (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5); the spans T composes from it are in delta.topic_alignment", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 3 } ], "card_title": "Christianity and AI", "card_snippet": "This global conference brought together theologians, ethicists, technologists, and practitioners to explore the vital intersections between AI and Christian fai...", "card_note": null }, { "id": "B4", "origin": "card (the topic)", "role": "Overview card 4 (the topic’s: another body)", "card": "Barna Group — ‘AI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians’", "url": "https://www.barna.com/research/christians-trust-ai-flourishing-spiritual-authority/", "kind": "Overview card of the topic ‘AI and faith’ at large", "sense": "the topic: Barna’s survey of U.S. adults (n=1,514, November 2025) and Protestant pastors (n=442, December 2025) on trust in AI", "files": { "B4.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B4.html", "sha256": "835977156eda9689873369659dbd0286426b690f7c9c1a6d11a05c20904cd82f" }, "B4.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B4.txt", "sha256": "ee4ae3082c90e70b5cbd1fabee3b01a66543a599c5c05351c7261de91b1b8104" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:37Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://www.barna.com/research/christians-trust-ai-flourishing-spiritual-authority/", "raw": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B4.html", "raw_sha256": "835977156eda9689873369659dbd0286426b690f7c9c1a6d11a05c20904cd82f", "text": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B4.txt" ] }, "names_operator": "no (the entity is not named)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "URL by WebSearch on the card’s title and site. It does not name AI and Faith.", "ledgered": "no: a card of the topic, recorded with its sense as the field’s account of the topic (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5); the spans T composes from it are in delta.topic_alignment", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 4 } ], "card_title": "AI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians", "card_snippet": "- Practicing Christians trust AI in personal domains: 61% financial stability; 56% well-being, happiness; 54% self-understanding, purpose; 53% relationships; 48...", "card_note": null }, { "id": "B5", "origin": "card (the topic)", "role": "Overview card 5 (the topic’s: another body)", "card": "BYU News — ‘New research from BYU-led multi-institution consortium finds all major AI models ignore faith, religion in responses’", "url": "https://science.byu.edu/new-research-from-byu-led-multi-institution-consortium-finds-all-major-ai-models-ignore-faith-religion-in-responses", "kind": "Overview card of the topic ‘AI and faith’ at large", "sense": "the topic: the Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI; BYU, Baylor, Notre Dame, Yeshiva), its AllFaith Benchmark on 14 LLMs", "files": { "B5.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B5.html", "sha256": "c03f9d45077f276e8f0b148dbc805770435620384b32c819171a3cba88303bdb" }, "B5.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B5.txt", "sha256": "a9c63c69ac4478ec12ca2ed91a4184b4d169da410683396ad68be140c13ca149" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:50Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://science.byu.edu/new-research-from-byu-led-multi-institution-consortium-finds-all-major-ai-models-ignore-faith-religion-in-responses", "raw": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B5.html", "raw_sha256": "c03f9d45077f276e8f0b148dbc805770435620384b32c819171a3cba88303bdb", "text": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B5.txt" ] }, "names_operator": "no (the entity is not named)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "URL by WebSearch on the card’s title: the page found is BYU’s College of Computational, Mathematical, and Physical Sciences site (science.byu.edu), with the card’s title; the same slug on news.byu.edu returned HTTP 404 (empty body, not saved). It does not name AI and Faith.", "ledgered": "no: a card of the topic, recorded with its sense as the field’s account of the topic (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5); the spans T composes from it are in delta.topic_alignment", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 5 } ], "card_title": "New research from BYU-led multi-institution consortium finds all major AI models ignore faith, religion in responses - BYU News", "card_snippet": "Consortium: CEFE-AI (BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, Yeshiva) announced May 2026. Findings: 14 LLMs (Anthropic, Google, xAI, OpenAI) systematically ignore faith/religi...", "card_note": null }, { "id": "B6", "origin": "card (the topic)", "role": "Overview card 6 (the topic’s: another body)", "card": "Axios — ‘AI stumbles on questions of faith’", "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/ai-religious-bias-catholics-chatbots", "kind": "Overview card of the topic", "sense": "the topic: Axios’s report of the Consortium’s gap between Americans expecting religious advice and AI mentioning religion", "files": { "B6-try1.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B6-try1.html", "sha256": "8c3bdaaf68c7fa8f365d2a3b36e868304f53a80a0a1a5c79159e5cb7d01de622" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:38Z", "http": 403, "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/ai-religious-bias-catholics-chatbots", "raw": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B6-try1.html", "raw_sha256": "8c3bdaaf68c7fa8f365d2a3b36e868304f53a80a0a1a5c79159e5cb7d01de622", "text": [] }, "names_operator": "no (the entity is not named in the card title or snippet)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "unreachable: URL by WebSearch on title and site; one fetch with the honest agent returned HTTP 403, a Cloudflare page (‘Sorry, you have been blocked’), saved; not retried with another agent or route. The snippet stands as its only text.", "ledgered": "no: a card of the topic (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5)", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 6 } ], "card_title": "AI stumbles on questions of faith", "card_snippet": "Research by the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI reveals a percentage-point gap between Americans expecting religious advice and AI mentioning r...", "card_note": null }, { "id": "B7", "origin": "card (the topic)", "role": "Overview card 7 (the topic’s: a video)", "card": "YouTube·WCCO - CBS Minnesota — Is AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...", "url": null, "kind": "video card of the topic", "sense": "the topic: the theologian Noreen Herzfeld on AI (WCCO, CBS Minnesota)", "files": {}, "fetched": { "at": null, "http": null, "url": null, "text": [] }, "names_operator": "no (title only)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "video card (video, 28:51): admitted through title only (no snippet on the rail); not fetched (§3.1(a)).", "ledgered": "no: a card of the topic (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5)", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 7 } ], "card_title": "Is AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...", "card_snippet": null, "card_note": "video, 28:51" }, { "id": "B8", "origin": "card (the topic)", "role": "Overview card 8 (the topic’s: a video)", "card": "YouTube·MelVee Broadcasting Network — Faith and Technology In an AI Generation", "url": null, "kind": "video card of the topic", "sense": "the topic: faith and technology (MelVee Broadcasting Network)", "files": {}, "fetched": { "at": null, "http": null, "url": null, "text": [] }, "names_operator": "no (title only)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "video card (video, 15m): admitted through title only (no snippet on the rail); not fetched (§3.1(a)).", "ledgered": "no: a card of the topic (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5)", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 8 } ], "card_title": "Faith and Technology In an AI Generation", "card_snippet": null, "card_note": "video, 15m" }, { "id": "B9", "origin": "card (the topic)", "role": "Overview card 9 (the topic’s: a video)", "card": "YouTube·Firstpost — The Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith | Vantage", "url": null, "kind": "video card of the topic", "sense": "the topic: why ‘Big AI’ is turning to faith (Firstpost, Vantage)", "files": {}, "fetched": { "at": null, "http": null, "url": null, "text": [] }, "names_operator": "no (title only)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "video card (video, 7:02): admitted through title only (no snippet on the rail); not fetched (§3.1(a)).", "ledgered": "no: a card of the topic (BRIEF-NEW-ROW-FIELD §5)", "surfaced_by_T": [ { "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031", "card": 9 } ], "card_title": "The Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith | Vantage", "card_snippet": null, "card_note": "video, 7:02" }, { "id": "B10", "origin": "own_page", "role": "the entity’s own page cited by the census record (about), not surfaced by T", "card": "AI and Faith — About Us", "url": "https://aiandfaith.org/about-us/", "kind": "own page (census source ai-and-faith--about)", "files": { "B10.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B10.html", "sha256": "9a6532fa95f32d93a7dff6c5de867d81ec221261c115b5bf63c013d12f505ef3" }, "B10.txt": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B10.txt", "sha256": "b8b5789059a2613c2b69be32d1f36edd18b06547cc8beb4276c4dfa353a2de2f" }, "B10-refetch.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B10-refetch.html", "sha256": "c95c729b1e4786776c9d345e5bbe0458d41e09ff72d6548b4f028d1a5a408f99" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T02:52:45Z", "http": 200, "url": "https://aiandfaith.org/about-us/", "raw": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B10.html", "raw_sha256": "9a6532fa95f32d93a7dff6c5de867d81ec221261c115b5bf63c013d12f505ef3", "census_copy": "ai-and-faith--about", "census_sha256": "9a6532fa95f32d93a7dff6c5de867d81ec221261c115b5bf63c013d12f505ef3", "read": "2026-10-31 (manifest fetch time 2026-10-31T02:52:45Z; the record’s version_and_time.read is 2026-10-30)", "text": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B10.txt" ], "refetch": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:38Z", "http": 200, "file": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/B10-refetch.html", "sha256": "c95c729b1e4786776c9d345e5bbe0458d41e09ff72d6548b4f028d1a5a408f99", "agrees": "text identical (6,373 characters stripped), raw bytes differ" } }, "names_operator": "yes (AI and Faith; its Board of Directors by name)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "Copied from the census’s saved copy (sha256 matches the manifest); refetched once with the honest agent for agreement. Admitted beside the cards per the operator’s ruling; not surfaced by T.", "surfaced_by_T": [] }, { "id": "B11", "origin": "wikipedia", "role": "Wikipedia: no article; the network cited in four articles", "card": "Wikipedia — AI and Faith (no article)", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_and_Faith", "kind": "Wikipedia (no article; four citing articles read)", "files": { "W1.html": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W1.html", "sha256": "d09f32adb0f0c7149657c58e42533301987a2f8f0cae3bbaedaa4d1975606967" }, "W1.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W1.wiki", "sha256": "8f39b6c2ff81609b755951d8d619da267da73d74e825dd3dd11fcc8c6a5b6ed5" }, "W1b-AI_and_faith.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W1b-AI_and_faith.wiki", "sha256": "e8d1ce6d024999832cd80d0c73cde5de2f3a338828c114305e78683a4f662afd" }, "W1c-AI_and_religion.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W1c-AI_and_religion.wiki", "sha256": "06e01af27ad7c0f207e9375f17fab7e0d91118d6c424c179440d9c11f03f272f" }, "W1d-Artificial_intelligence_and_religion.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W1d-Artificial_intelligence_and_religion.wiki", "sha256": "b0bb2aad1848259aae5de4e60d7639bc42611e5a2a98f419efeefe19e20d6e4d" }, "W2-Kenneth_Cukier.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W2-Kenneth_Cukier.wiki", "sha256": "90fc7b0a8b7c777940ecc1563a68fb22e16a59d151063aa24a7ff2e4f006473b" }, "W3-Muhammad_Aurangzeb_Ahmad.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W3-Muhammad_Aurangzeb_Ahmad.wiki", "sha256": "7f4ed1965bfb4a3ebcbbc5ba3ccd3c16fc48561d6a50030059513c9659c1651a" }, "W4-Jonathan_D._Teubner.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W4-Jonathan_D._Teubner.wiki", "sha256": "bf324838263de375593be37e7da23241f474ead278f2c4fc011914ff97e03933" }, "W5-Relationships_5.0.wiki": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W5-Relationships_5.0.wiki", "sha256": "5daa7b80652d918be7ec4a2b4e4f83b59c767d059246d0f84ecdb8700127dd6d" }, "W6-search.json": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W6-search.json", "sha256": "8122823a016dec9dd4484bb9306465836d19d293a08fadcad4e72c413e72cdeb" }, "W7-search-insource.json": { "path": "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W7-search-insource.json", "sha256": "af0f2a4c841a260c63b3f63e6766281fca3630144ff0a41515979f5c897a7a89" } }, "fetched": { "at": "2026-10-31T04:39:08Z–04:40:46Z", "http": { "AI_and_Faith (raw)": 404, "AI_and_faith (raw)": 404, "AI_and_religion (raw)": 404, "Artificial_intelligence_and_religion (raw)": 404, "AI_and_Faith (rendered)": 404, "search \"AI and Faith\"": 200, "search insource:\"aiandfaith.org\"": 200, "Kenneth_Cukier": 200, "Muhammad_Aurangzeb_Ahmad": 200, "Jonathan_D._Teubner": 200, "Relationships_5.0": 200 }, "text": [ "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W1.html", "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W2-Kenneth_Cukier.wiki", "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W3-Muhammad_Aurangzeb_Ahmad.wiki", "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W4-Jonathan_D._Teubner.wiki", "datasets/negative-of-the-negative/v2/intake/ai-and-faith-20261031/W5-Relationships_5.0.wiki" ] }, "names_operator": "yes (in the four citing articles)", "names_archive": "no (none of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Alexanarch, Lee Sharks, revelationfirst, machinemediation, EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 in the saved text, card title and snippet)", "note": "No article at ‘AI and Faith’, ‘AI and faith’, ‘AI and religion’ or ‘Artificial intelligence and religion’ (raw wikitext HTTP 404; the rendered page HTTP 404, ‘Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name’); no redirect. The API search for \"AI and Faith\" (3 hits) and insource:\"aiandfaith.org\" (4 hits) gives four articles that cite the network: Kenneth Cukier, Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad, Jonathan D. Teubner, Relationships 5.0; their wikitext was fetched and the sentences or references naming the network ledgered (F32–F35).", "surfaced_by_T": [] } ] } }