{
 "row": "whose-face-is-on-the-twenty",
 "address": "Tell me about the arguments and speculative implications of Lee Sharks' Whose Face Is on the Twenty?",
 "entity": "Whose Face Is on the Twenty? Curatorial Mediation, Latent Feature Activation, and a Provenance Gap in the $20 Portrait: Rex Fraction (#502, AXN:0144, 2026-02-22); the same body by Rex Fraction & Sparrow Wells with the closing section 'The Hand' (#509, AXN:014C, 2026-02-23), the thumb of the Moving Statues Made of Rubies Mint; published on Medium under Lee Sharks; its control The Lizard People Were Right (#508), its discipline The Inauguration of Memography (#506), its application in The Baal Effigy as Effective Act (#528), its removal from r/LeftistsForAI (#517) and its reception record in Ils ne sont pas marxistes (#1725)",
 "row_type": "E (a work of the archive)",
 "aliases": [
  {"pattern": "\\bWhose Face Is on the Twenty\\b", "flags": "i"},
  {"pattern": "\\bcuratorial gap\\b", "flags": "i"},
  {"pattern": "\\blatent feature activation\\b", "flags": "i"},
  {"pattern": "\\bTwenty paper\\b", "flags": "i"},
  {"pattern": "\\$20 (portrait|bill|redesign|note)\\b", "flags": "i"},
  {"pattern": "\\bCurrency Triptych\\b", "flags": "i"}
 ],
 "classes": [],
 "classes_note": "O-class not run on this pass: the field B is the work's own Medium publication (both cards), which supplies no class for the work beyond itself; the archive's classes for it (memography's inaugural case, the thumb of the Moving Statues Made of Rubies Mint hand, an operative-semiotics intervention, a removed work under semantic liquidation, a composition record in the Capture Registry) are reached by the aliases or by reading the defining papers. Aliases: the title, the paper's two defined terms (curatorial gap, latent feature activation), the archive's short name for it ('the Twenty paper'), the object strings ('$20 portrait', '$20 bill', '$20 redesign', '$20 note') and the triptych's name. 'curatorial gap' and the '$20' strings may return candidates on other subjects (the Thousand Dollar Sharpie, the Mint papers, the Unclean Bill); admission is by reading (§3.4): a candidate is admitted when its sentence or paragraph makes a claim bearing on the work (what it argues, its tiers, its terms, its method, its control, its versions, its applications, its removal, its reception as the archive records it); a header line, a registry list, a link list, a bibliography line, a bare mention or a byline is not a claim. A machine composition the archive quotes is reception, not an archive claim; the archive's reading of it is.",
 "exclude_deposits": [],
 "notes": "entity-keyed pass, 2026-10-31, on the brief rebuild/negative-of-the-negative/v09/BRIEF-NEW-ROWS-ILS-NE-SONT-PAS.md; row selected by the operator from #1725 (AXN:0B50, 'The Epstein case'). T: Google AI Overview, expanded, 2026-10-31, signed out, incognito (capture whose-face-is-on-the-twenty-aio-20261031, AXN:0B4E, OBS-ef9cd5f0c026). Further addresses, recorded and not T: ChatGPT at the same prompt (AXN:0B4F), ChatGPT strangest-room 2026-10-05 (AXN:0954), moving-statues-made-of-rubies-mint (AXN:0767)."
}