[
 {
  "id": "S123-01",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Socrates is defined, in the reading, as the orthonym: the position bearing the founding gesture (willing death for logos), constituted by that gesture and not by textual output, characterized by not writing.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Abstract",
  "quote": "Socrates is identified, in this reading, as the orthonym — the position bearing the project's founding operative gesture (the willing death for *logos*), constituted analytically by that gesture rather than by textual output, and characterized by the choice *not to write*.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "Socrates as orthonym",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-02",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem is reclassified as a symptom of a heteronymic configuration the biological-individuation model of authorship cannot recognize, not a problem for historical disentanglement.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Abstract",
  "quote": "The orthodox \"Socratic problem\" of classical philology is reclassified by this reading: not a problem to be solved by historical disentanglement, but a symptom of a heteronymic configuration that the modern biological-individuation model of authorship has been structurally unable to recognize.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-03",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Plato is the survival-heteronym, summoned into the vacancy of Socrates' refusal to write, rendering the founding gesture transmissible.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "R",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Abstract",
  "quote": "Plato is identified as the survival-heteronym — the position summoned, by functional vacancy, into the space left by the orthonym's refusal to write, whose authorial function is to render the founding gesture transmissible across the rupture of Socrates' death.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "survival-heteronym fills the vacancy",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-04",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Limit: the paper does not claim to solve the Socratic problem historically; only to reclassify it under a functional lens.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§0 Non-Claims",
  "quote": "It does not claim that the Socratic problem has been solved in the conventional historical sense; it claims the problem can be *reclassified* under a functional rather than a biographical lens.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "firewall / non-claims of identity",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-05",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Limit: no claim that Socrates, Plato and Aristotle were one historical person.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§0 Non-Claims",
  "quote": "It does not claim that Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle were biologically identical, or that they constituted a single historical person.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "firewall / non-claims of identity",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-06",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The symptom claim is held at medium confidence (secondary claim), below the functional-model claim.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§0 Non-Claims (tiered claims)",
  "quote": "Secondary claim (medium confidence): Under this model, the Socratic problem appears as a symptom rather than a problem.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-07",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem is the unresolved question where the historical Socrates ends and the Platonic literary character begins.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "The orthodox name for this failure is *the Socratic problem*: the unresolved question of where the historical Socrates ends and the Platonic literary character begins.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem defined (historical man vs Platonic character)",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-08",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem is a family of three questions: historical, literary, doctrinal.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "At least three versions can be distinguished:- The historical question: What did the historical Socrates of Athens actually believe and teach?- The literary question: How does the character \"Socrates\" function within Plato's dialogues — as mouthpiece, foil, dialectical instrument, dramatic protagonist?- The doctrinal question: Which positions in the Platonic corpus are Socratic (inherited from the historical figure) and which are Platonic (developed by Plato under Socrates' name)?",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as a family of three questions",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-09",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The historical Socrates remains real; his historical function is the orthonymic gesture, not the source of doctrines Plato transcribed or modified.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "It *reframes* the historical question: the historical Socrates remains historically real, but his historical function within the configuration is now understood as the orthonymic gesture (refusal to write, willing death for logos), not as the source of specific philosophical doctrines that Plato then transcribed or modified.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "historical Socrates real; function is the gesture",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-10",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The reading dissolves the doctrinal question (Socratic vs Platonic positions) into a question of functional role.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "The heteronymic reading proposed here primarily *dissolves* the doctrinal question: under a functional-distribution model, the question \"which positions are Socratic, which Platonic?\" is reframed as \"which positions occupy which functional role in the configuration?\"",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "three questions affected differently",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-11",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The literary question is left largely intact; the frame supplements literary-critical method.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "It *leaves largely intact* the literary question: Plato's literary use of the character Socrates remains an object of legitimate analysis under the heteronymic reading; the heteronymic frame supplements rather than replaces literary-critical method.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "three questions affected differently",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-12",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Against Kahn's Socrates (a Platonic literary construction), the reading's Socrates is the orthonym whose refusal organizes the Platonic project.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "attributed (Kahn 1996)",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I.A",
  "quote": "Kahn's Socrates is a Platonic literary construction. The heteronymic reading's Socrates is the orthonym whose refusal *organizes* the subsequent Platonic project, even though he wrote no text himself.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as authorial position, not literary character (vs Kahn/Danzig/Nehamas)",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-13",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "That Socrates wrote nothing is structural, not incidental.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§III",
  "quote": "That Socrates wrote nothing is, on this analysis, not incidental but structural.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "not writing as defining property, not gap in evidence",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-14",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem is the operator's failure mode under biographical reduction: the orthonymic position misread as a missing historical author.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§III Operator specification σ_S",
  "quote": "- Failure mode under biographical reduction: The orthodox Socratic problem, in which the orthonymic position is misread as a missing historical author rather than as a constitutive structural function.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-15",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Aristotle's Metaphysics A 6 (locus classicus for separating Socrates from Plato) is read also as the configuration's self-documentation, compatible with the biographical reading.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§VII",
  "quote": "On this reading, Aristotle's *Metaphysics* A 6 is the configuration's own internal self-documentation, performed by the position structurally summoned to perform it. The biographical and structural readings are compatible; the heteronymic reading adds the structural dimension without claiming the biographical dimension is illusory.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle's testimony as configuration's self-documentation",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-16",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Limit: the CHA makes the reading thinkable, not proven (availability of concept).",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§IX",
  "quote": "The paper's claim is therefore the weaker, more defensible one: the heteronymic reading of the Socratic configuration becomes *thinkable* under the conditions of the contemporary apparatus. It is not *proven* by the contemporary apparatus.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "CHA as availability of concept, not proof",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-17",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "The archive's own practice is continuous with the project Plato and Aristotle pursued under Socrates' orthonymic gesture.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§X",
  "quote": "The CHA's contemporary practice is, on this reading, continuous with the project Plato and Aristotle pursued under Socrates' orthonymic gesture.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "configuration continuous with CHA practice",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S123-18",
  "dep": 123,
  "claim": "Two centuries of Socratic-problem scholarship is recovered as evidence about the configuration's structure.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§X",
  "quote": "Two centuries of work on the Socratic problem is recovered, under the heteronymic frame, as work on the configuration's structure: every philological observation, every textual analysis, every dating argument, every doctrinal comparison becomes available as evidence for how the configuration operates.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-01",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "Scholarship forecloses the heteronymic reading of the Socratic problem because its biographical-documentary instruments cannot adjudicate it.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "Abstract",
  "quote": "From this follows the paper's culminating claim about transmission: institutional scholarship has foreclosed the heteronymic reading across domains (the Socratic problem, the Homeric question, the Synoptic problem, the Pauline authorship strata) not because the reading is implausible but because the discipline's instruments are biographical-documentary and therefore structurally incapable of adjudicating it",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "forced foreclosure / instrument-defeat",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-02",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem has a severe form: what criterion stops the configuration from absorbing every adjacent name.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§IX",
  "quote": "The Chaerephon dossier is offered not as a solution to the Socratic problem but as a demonstration that the Socratic problem has a *previously unnamed severe form*: not \"where does Socrates end and Plato begin?\" but \"what criterion stops the configuration from absorbing every adjacent name?\"",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "severe form of the Socratic problem (no-floor)",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-03",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "Limit: no claim that the six figures were one biological person.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§0 Non-Claims",
  "quote": "It does not claim that Aristophanes, Chaerephon, Socrates, Plato, Xenophon, and Aristotle were one biological person, or that any of them was biologically identical to any other.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "firewall / non-claims of identity",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-04",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "The portrayals conflict (Aristophanes mocks; Xenophon's civic Socrates differs from Plato's): the signature a heteronymic field would show.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§IV Step 4",
  "quote": "Ideological tension between positions (Aristophanes mocks Socrates; Aristotle departs from Plato; Xenophon's civic Socrates differs from Plato's): present.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "portrayal differences as functional division of labour",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-05",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "The portrayals divide functions: Aristophanes deforms, Plato defends, Xenophon remembers, Aristotle codifies.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§VIII",
  "quote": "Chaerephon asks, Apollo answers, Socrates interprets, Aristophanes deforms, Plato defends, Xenophon remembers, Aristotle codifies.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "portrayal differences as functional division of labour",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-06",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem is one instance of a recurring foreclosure signature: instruments fail at the same seam, the failure is named and routed around.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§VI",
  "quote": "Each generation of scholars meets the founding corpus, deploys the biographical instruments, fails at the same seam, names the failure (*the Socratic problem*, *the Homeric question*, *the Synoptic problem*, the authorship strata of the Pauline corpus), declares it unresolvable, and routes around it",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "forced foreclosure / instrument-defeat",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-07",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "Discriminator against the scarcity explanation: under scarcity, gaps are random with respect to function and resolvable by more evidence.",
  "kind": "falsifier",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§VI",
  "quote": "Under mere scarcity, the gaps are *random* with respect to function — more evidence would resolve them, and the missing pieces are not the load-bearing ones.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "instrument-defeat vs scarcity discriminator",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-08",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "Firewall: biographical identity requires evidence; functional identity requires pattern.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§VII",
  "quote": "Biographical identity requires evidence. Functional identity requires pattern.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "firewall / non-claims of identity",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S136-09",
  "dep": 136,
  "claim": "Thesis: not one hidden person on available evidence, but the Socratic archive behaves like a heteronymic field, visible at Chaerephon.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§VII thesis",
  "quote": "Aristophanes, Chaerephon, Socrates, Plato, Xenophon, and Aristotle were not (on available evidence) one hidden biological person. But the Socratic archive behaves like a heteronymic field, and Chaerephon is the point at which that behavior becomes visible",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic archive behaves like a heteronymic field",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1261-01",
  "dep": 1261,
  "claim": "Restates the parent's reclassification of the Socratic problem as a symptom.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I (The Problem Stated)",
  "quote": "The orthodox Socratic problem is reclassified as a symptom of the configuration rather than a confusion to be disentangled.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-06-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1261-02",
  "dep": 1261,
  "claim": "Instance of #136: the Socratic problem has a previously unnamed severe form.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§IX",
  "quote": "The Chaerephon dossier is offered not as a solution to the Socratic problem but as a demonstration that the Socratic problem has a previously unnamed severe form",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "severe form of the Socratic problem (no-floor)",
  "date": "2026-06-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S764-01",
  "dep": 764,
  "claim": "Ratification lists as a contribution: the Socratic problem re-narrated as forced foreclosure.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "¶ (2), contributions",
  "quote": "(2) The formalization of instrument-defeat — the historical paralysis of the academy (Socratic problem, Homeric question, Synoptic problem) re-narrated as forced foreclosure, the institutional dismissal unmasked as the automated firing of the relay.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "forced foreclosure / instrument-defeat",
  "date": "2026-05-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-01",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "Ep. II 314c describes an operation, an edition: the revamping and inhabiting of a received character whose surviving instance is the Apology's Aristophanic Socrates.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Abstract",
  "quote": "I argue that it describes an operation, not an attitude; that the operation is an edition — the revamping and inhabiting of a received character; that the base of the edition is a circulating character whose named, quoted, surviving instance the corpus itself cites — the *Apology*'s Aristophanic Socrates, received ἐκ παίδων",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "edition of a received character (314c)",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-02",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "The consensus reading: Plato idealized the historical Socrates; 314c is the earliest witness to the gap between man and literary figure.",
  "kind": "attributed",
  "modality": "attributed (consensus reading)",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§1",
  "quote": "Plato idealized his teacher: the historical Socrates, old and famously ugly, appears in the dialogues transfigured — wiser, lovelier, more youthful than life; the letter, authentic or not, is the earliest witness to the gap between the man and the literary figure",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem defined (historical man vs Platonic character)",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-03",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "The base of Plato's Socrates is not the historical man (beyond any text's reach) but a circulating character, surviving as Aristophanes' Socrates-the-sophist.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§1",
  "quote": "The base is not the historical Socrates, to whom the corpus's relation is beyond any text's reach; it is a *circulating* character — the work of πολλοὶ κατήγοροι over many years — whose named, quoted, surviving instance is Aristophanes' Socrates-the-sophist",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "base is a circulating character, not the man",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-04",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "Limit: no thesis about who the historical Socrates was or how many hands made the texts.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§1 scope",
  "quote": "And nothing here asserts a thesis about persons — about who the historical Socrates was, or how many hands made the texts",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "no thesis about persons",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-05",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "Limit: authenticity of the Second Letter is not decided; a forger is an early reader.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§1 scope",
  "quote": "Nothing here decides or needs the letter's authenticity: most scholars judge it spurious,[^2] and the argument is indifferent, because a forger is an early reader",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "no thesis about persons",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-06",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "The Apology's ἔστιν τις Σωκράτης marks a figure, not the man in court.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§3",
  "quote": "The grammar of the character is on the page: ἔστιν **τις** Σωκράτης — there is *a certain* Socrates, the indefinite of a figure, not the name of the man standing in court.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Apology records a prior comic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-07",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "Limit: the Clouds is the base's documented representative, not the source of every feature.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§3",
  "quote": "What is thereby demonstrated is engagement with the comic representation, quoted and disputed; that every feature of the received figure derives from that one play is neither claimed by the speech nor needed by this paper.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Apology records a prior comic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-08",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "The revision strikes the received items (pay, teaching, meteorology) one by one; the remade Socrates is argued unpaid.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§4",
  "quote": "The remade Socrates is constitutively unpaid, and his unpaid state is not incidental but *argued*.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "revision item by item",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-09",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "καλός names the silenus repair: the received ugliness kept as shell, value inverted inside.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§5",
  "quote": "The silenus is not a metaphor for Socrates; it is a description of the *repair*.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "two repairs (καλός, νέος)",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-10",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "νέος names the reissue: access to a young Socrates is manufactured as transmitted memory (Parmenides' chain of tellers).",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§5",
  "quote": "That is the point: access to a young Socrates is *manufactured as transmitted memory* — the reissue ships with a constructed chain of custody",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "two repairs (καλός, νέος)",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-11",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "Aristotle (SE 34) receives the edited Socrates as settled: Socrates set apart from the paid teachers of eristic.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§7",
  "quote": "The separations the *Apology* fought for line by line arrive in Aristotle as furniture: the boundary the *Clouds* fused and the dialogues recut is, by the epilogue, simply where things stand.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle receives the edited figure",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1579-12",
  "dep": 1579,
  "claim": "The idealization consensus is not wrong; it is the surface description of the edition.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§8",
  "quote": "The consensus reading of 314c — the idealized Socrates, beautified and rejuvenated by an admiring pupil — is not wrong; it is the surface description of the operation this paper has tried to read at depth, and it is absorbed accordingly.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "edition of a received character (314c)",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1583-01",
  "dep": 1583,
  "claim": "Ep. II 314c is an author dividing the work by named function (Plato withdrawn, sayings assigned to Socrates).",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (the Second Letter)",
  "quote": "The *Second Letter* states the instrument outright: οὐδ᾽ ἔστιν σύγγραμμα Πλάτωνος οὐδέν … τὰ δὲ νῦν λεγόμενα Σωκράτους ἐστίν — an author dividing the work by named function and saying so.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "edition of a received character (314c)",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-01",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Thesis at full strength: one hand wrote Plato and Socrates, and probably Xenophon and Aristophanes.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 43 §176",
  "quote": "**The claim is: one hand wrote Plato and Socrates, and probably Xenophon and Aristophanes.** State it, then be exact about what supports it, what does not, and what would.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "one hand wrote Plato and Socrates (full-strength thesis)",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-02",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Measured: outside the four corpora, Socrates is attested only by a lost pamphlet, one proverb, and one line in a Plato-reading forgery.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 43 §179",
  "quote": "The independent attestation of Socrates outside {Plato, Aristotle, Xenophon,\n> Aristophanes} is: a lost pamphlet known only from an attack on it, one proverb\n> in a writer inside the transmission, and one line in a forgery whose author was\n> reading the *Phaedrus*.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "attestation confined to the four corpora",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-03",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Limit: confinement is also what ordinary transmission loss produces.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 43 §180",
  "quote": "**Confinement of attestation is what a single-maker configuration predicts, and it is also what ordinary transmission loss produces** — Socrates was a subject for the Socratic writers, and the genre's survivors are the genre's survivors.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "attestation confined to the four corpora",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-04",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Falsifier: if other genre-subjects are as confined as Socrates, confinement is genre, not special.",
  "kind": "falsifier",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 43 §180",
  "quote": "Testable: other figures who were subjects of a genre (Gorgias, Protagoras, Alcibiades) should show comparable confinement if genre is the explanation, and should show LESS if the Socrates case is special.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "attestation confined to the four corpora",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-05",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Test result: Protagoras (99.8%) is more confined than Socrates (99.5%); confinement is unremarkable within his class.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 43 §181",
  "quote": "**Nobody holds that Protagoras was constructed.** So confinement of attestation is what being a subject of philosophical dialogue produces, and Socrates' 99.5% is **unremarkable within his class**.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "confinement withdrawn by Protagoras control",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-06",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "The inference from confinement to single authorship is withdrawn.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 43 §181",
  "quote": "**§179's inference is therefore withdrawn.** *There is no outside* remains true as a description of the Socratic evidence and is **not** evidence for single authorship, because the same description holds of a figure the thesis does not claim.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "confinement withdrawn by Protagoras control",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-07",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "What distinguishes Socrates is volume and four functional roles across four corpora (speaker, example, target, reported master); measurement named, not run.",
  "kind": "hypothesis",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 43 §181",
  "quote": "He is distinguished by VOLUME** — 2,330 occurrences against 442 — and by being the only member of his class who is the *speaking position* of one corpus, the *silent example* of another, the *target* of a third, and the *reported master* of a fourth.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates distinguished by volume and four roles",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-08",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Many and One has been answering the Socratic problem (reclassifying it as symptom) without naming it.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§237",
  "quote": "**That is a reclassification of the Socratic problem as a symptom, and the paper does not say the words.**",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-09",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Firewall carried into Many and One: biographical identity requires evidence, functional identity requires pattern.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§238 (firewall)",
  "quote": "Biographical identity requires EVIDENCE. Functional identity requires PATTERN.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "firewall / non-claims of identity",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-10",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "The corpus records a prior, public, comic Socrates and answers it by naming the comedy.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 54 §243",
  "quote": "The corpus records a prior, publicly circulating Socrates, comic in origin, which\n> it must answer — and answers by naming the comedy.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Apology records a prior comic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-11",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Measured: the Clouds' just/unjust argument is relabelled in the Apology as weaker/stronger: a transformation, not a copy.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 54 §245",
  "quote": "THE COMEDY STAGES THE JUST AND THE UNJUST ARGUMENT. THE *APOLOGY* REPORTS THE\n> CHARGE AS THE WEAKER AND THE STRONGER.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "comic layer: notoriety, not operation",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-12",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Nothing of the questioning method, midwifery, ignorance-as-position is in the comic layer: the accusation-profile is comic, the operation is not.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 54 §246",
  "quote": "THE ACCUSATION-PROFILE IS COMIC. THE OPERATION IS NOT.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "comic layer: notoriety, not operation",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-13",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Limit: Aristophanes' placement inside or outside the maker set is not settled.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Round 54 §248",
  "quote": "**NOT SETTLED:** whether Aristophanes is better placed inside or outside the maker set. **This round shows the outside placement is available and cheap. It does not show the inside placement is wrong.**",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "comic layer: notoriety, not operation",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-14",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Socrates' not writing is not an absence in the evidence but the form the centre necessarily takes.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (vacant centre)",
  "quote": "On this logic, Socrates not writing stops being an absence in the evidence and becomes the form the centre necessarily takes.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "not writing as defining property, not gap in evidence",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1569-15",
  "dep": 1569,
  "claim": "Certification asymmetry: Socrates attested only through figures inside the cluster; Aristotle alone has external documentary attestation.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "S8 (M39)",
  "quote": "Socrates wrote nothing and is attested only through figures inside the cluster; Plato through the corpus that denies being his; Aristophanes through a civic record naming producers.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "attestation confined to the four corpora",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1570-01",
  "dep": 1570,
  "claim": "M34: in Aristotle, Socrates never appears in snub contexts (0/144) against his placeholder-twin Callias (5/35), p = 0.00022.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§23 M34",
  "quote": "Callias  in snub contexts     5 / 35   = 14.3%\n    Socrates in snub contexts     0 / 144  =  0.0%\n    Fisher exact, two-sided                  p = 0.00022",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle's Socrates excluded from the snub (M34)",
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1570-02",
  "dep": 1570,
  "claim": "Limit: the innocent reading (Socrates' snub is biographical, so avoided) fully explains the distribution.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§23 M34",
  "quote": "**Both readings, and the innocent one is not weak.** Socrates already carries the snub as a **biographical** fact, so using him would import unwanted associations into a technical example; Aristotle picks the neutral twin *because* Socrates is not neutral. That fully explains the distribution.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle's Socrates excluded from the snub (M34)",
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1570-03",
  "dep": 1570,
  "claim": "Socrates is the one individual whose snubness is unusable as a variable in Aristotle.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§23 M34",
  "quote": "But it concedes the premise: **Socrates is the one individual whose snubness is unavailable for use as a variable.**",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle's Socrates excluded from the snub (M34)",
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1570-04",
  "dep": 1570,
  "claim": "M15: Plato's Socrates, Athenian and Eleatic Strangers form a near-equilateral in stylometric space.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "M15",
  "quote": "**M15 — The equilateral.** Socrates | Athenian | Eleatic form a near-perfect\nequilateral: balance (min/max displacement magnitude) **0.953**, angles 116.8° /\n121.4° / 121.8°, spread under 5°.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as speaking position measured",
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1570-05",
  "dep": 1570,
  "claim": "M16: Plato's constructed Aristophanes speech reads more Platonic than its neighbours: Plato does not construct heteronymically against a checkable target.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "M16",
  "quote": "Given the one chance to construct against a checkable target, the speech comes out *more* Platonic than its neighbours, not less. **The only ancient case with an independently attested target, and it reads negative.**",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato's characters come out as the maker",
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1571-01",
  "dep": 1571,
  "claim": "Pre-registered falsifier: if Socrates is not among the loosest speaking positions, the hypothesis fails.",
  "kind": "falsifier",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "P2 (frozen)",
  "quote": "If **Socrates is not among the loosest**, P2 fails and the hypothesis fails with it — Socrates is the least constrained speaker in the corpus and the prediction is unambiguous.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates the loosest speaking position",
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1571-02",
  "dep": 1571,
  "claim": "Result: P2 holds; Socrates is rank 1 of 7 from the loose end.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Run 2026-08-29",
  "quote": "**RUN 2026-08-29. P2 HOLDS** — Socrates rank 1 of 7 from the loose end at 1.166, and Timaeus tightest at 1.649, both as frozen.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates the loosest speaking position",
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1572-01",
  "dep": 1572,
  "claim": "Confinement of Socrates' attestation does not discriminate: it is produced by being a subject of philosophical dialogue.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§9",
  "quote": "**The split is by kind of figure. Being a subject of philosophical dialogue produces confinement, and no one holds that Protagoras was constructed.**",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "confinement withdrawn by Protagoras control",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1572-02",
  "dep": 1572,
  "claim": "Measured confinement rates: Socrates 99.5%, Protagoras 99.8%, politicians 25-65%.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§9",
  "quote": "Socrates is 99.5% confined to the four-corpus cluster — and **Protagoras is 99.8%**, Gorgias 99.0%, Prodicus 98.5%, against Cleon 64.6%, Pericles 63.9%, Alcibiades 56.4%, Themistocles 25.4%.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "confinement withdrawn by Protagoras control",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1575-01",
  "dep": 1575,
  "claim": "Under a functional lens the Socratic problem appears as a symptom; it is not claimed solved.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "[V.1]",
  "quote": "The claim here is not that the problem is solved. It is that under a functional\n> lens it appears as a SYMPTOM rather than a problem",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1575-02",
  "dep": 1575,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem is a family: historical, methodological, literary (the methodological replaces #123's doctrinal).",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "[V.1]",
  "quote": "And it is a family rather than one problem: the historical question (what did the man hold), the methodological question (what could count as evidence), and the literary question (what is the character for).",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as a family of three questions",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1575-03",
  "dep": 1575,
  "claim": "Danzig and Nehamas treat Socrates as constructed by authors; the paper's position is a position the authorship is organised around.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "attributed (Danzig 2010; Nehamas 1998)",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "[V.3]",
  "quote": "*Both are one step from the position §V takes and neither takes it: the constructed figure remains, for them, a character made by authors rather than a position the authorship is organised around.*",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as authorial position, not literary character (vs Kahn/Danzig/Nehamas)",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1575-04",
  "dep": 1575,
  "claim": "Tiered claim structure: 'one person wrote the corpus' asserted and argued at §VI.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "[F2] tiered claims",
  "quote": "§VI CLAIM  (asserted, argued) ONE PERSON wrote the corpus",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "one hand wrote Plato and Socrates (full-strength thesis)",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1575-05",
  "dep": 1575,
  "claim": "Limit on the speaking-position measure: a dramatist produces the same gradient.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§VI ¶2a",
  "quote": "a dramatist specifying characters to differing depths produces the same gradient — construction, which dramatic and heteronymic composition share",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates the loosest speaking position",
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-01",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "The Socratic problem is reclassified, not solved: a symptom of a configuration the biographical model cannot represent.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§6.5",
  "quote": "This section does not solve it. It reclassifies it: under a functional lens, the problem appears as a symptom — the predictable trace of a configuration the biographical model cannot represent — rather than as a question awaiting a biographical answer.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem as symptom",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-02",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "Functional identity established by pattern; biographical identity by evidence of a different kind.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§6",
  "quote": "Functional identity — that a set of texts can be read as one account — is established by pattern; biographical identity — that one embodied person wrote them — by evidence of a different kind.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "firewall / non-claims of identity",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-03",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "Comedy supplied Socrates' notoriety; the later corpus occupied the position and differentiated it.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§6.4",
  "quote": "What the observation adds is a distinction: the accusation-profile is comic, and the operation — the questioning, the midwifery, the ignorance held as a position — is not in the comic layer at all. Comedy supplied the notoriety; the later corpus occupied the position and differentiated it.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "comic layer: notoriety, not operation",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-04",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "In Aristotle, Socrates is the name-placeholder, never the face (snub) placeholder.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§7.2",
  "quote": "Where Aristotle needs a face he uses Callias; where he needs a name he uses Socrates.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle's Socrates excluded from the snub (M34)",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-05",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "SE 34's Socrates sentence, at face value: Socrates questioned and disclaimed knowledge.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§7.3",
  "quote": "Socrates questioned and disclaimed knowledge, so the dialectical programme must also treat the answerer's role; that is what the sentence says.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34: Socrates inside the account, not a source",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-06",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "The 'early dialogues' on which the Socratic problem rests are largely a construction of stylometric stratification.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§8",
  "quote": "The Socratic problem's \"early dialogues\" are a set that construction largely defined",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "early dialogues as construction of the instrument",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-07",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "The instrument set classed Plato and Xenophon as one author (reported as part of a null).",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§8",
  "quote": "And the instrument set, checked late against known pairs, agreed on one of three and classed Plato and Xenophon as one author.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "instruments null on maker-count",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-08",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "Danzig and Nehamas: constructed figure as character made by authors; this paper: position the authorship is organised around.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "attributed (Danzig 2010; Nehamas 1998)",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "n. 11",
  "quote": "Danzig, *Apologizing for Socrates* (2010), and Nehamas, *The Art of Living* (1998), are one step from this section's position and do not take it: for both, the constructed figure is a character made by authors, not a position the authorship is organised around.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as authorial position, not literary character (vs Kahn/Danzig/Nehamas)",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1576-09",
  "dep": 1576,
  "claim": "The name 'Socrates' cannot establish two makers: it is a figure the corpus says it answered from a comedy.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§9.6",
  "quote": "The names are the objects under examination — a Socrates the corpus itself says was answered from a comedy",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Apology records a prior comic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-09-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1574-01",
  "dep": 1574,
  "claim": "Across reviewer reports, keeping Socrates before SE 34's 'nothing' rests on a premise external to the passage (historical priority).",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§3.2",
  "quote": "What remained constant across all five is the sentence beneath them, which every reviewer wrote and none located: \"Socrates plainly predates Aristotle\"; \"of course, historically it is\"; \"it plainly did.\" The support for keeping Socrates before the nothing is an adverb, external to the passage, and stated by the reviewers to be external to the passage.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34: Socrates inside the account, not a source",
  "date": "2026-09-02",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1574-02",
  "dep": 1574,
  "claim": "Limit: the run does not establish Socrates inside the 'we'; it shows exclusion required chronological maker-separation as external premise.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "closing",
  "quote": "The run does not establish that Socrates belongs inside the chapter's \"we.\" It establishes that every tested route for excluding him eventually required a premise not supplied by the passage, and that the terminal premise was chronological maker-separation.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34: Socrates inside the account, not a source",
  "date": "2026-09-02",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-01",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "Aristotle's SE 34 has already dissolved Socrates as a predecessor from whom something of the inquiry was received.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Abstract",
  "quote": "I argue that the sentence means what it says; that the closing chapter is built, joint by joint, so that it can be kept; and that the figure the qualification exists to protect — Socrates as a predecessor from whom something of the inquiry was received — is a figure the chapter itself has already dissolved.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34: Socrates inside the account, not a source",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-02",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "Limit: no assertion about history beyond what the paragraph asserts.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§1",
  "quote": "Socrates asked; the practice of examining existed; the paper asserts nothing about history beyond what the paragraph asserts, and the paragraph, we will see, asserts less about history than its readers do.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "no thesis about persons",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-03",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "SE 183b6-8 places Socrates inside the explanation of the inquiry's second task.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§5",
  "quote": "That Socrates is placed inside the explanation of the inquiry's second task, the sentence establishes.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34: Socrates inside the account, not a source",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-04",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "Metaphysics Μ 4's assignment to Socrates (inductive arguments, universal definition) is the paper's configuration stated by Aristotle as history.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§5 (Metaphysics Μ 4)",
  "quote": "Hold the clauses together and they are the configuration argued here, stated by Aristotle as history: the man engaged in the operations — seeking to syllogize, working the starting-point of syllogisms — while the capacity, the ἰσχύς, *was not yet there*; two contributions justly assigned to him; their misdevelopment charged to others.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle's Μ 4 testimony read with SE 34",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-05",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "Limit: Socrates inside the first-person 'we' is not demonstrated.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§5",
  "quote": "That he stands inside the first person's referent, nothing here demonstrates, and nothing here claims it as demonstrated",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34: Socrates inside the account, not a source",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-06",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "The SE's ending performs Socrates' questioning on its reader.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§9",
  "quote": "Socrates' questioning supplies the form of the examination the ending performs on its reader.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34 ending performs Socratic questioning",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-07",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "Limit: whether Socrates possessed the τέχνη is left unsettled.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§9",
  "quote": "That is a claim about the operation as the ending performs it, not a claim that an artful enactment settles, retrospectively, its named practitioner's possession of the art",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "SE 34 ending performs Socratic questioning",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1603-08",
  "dep": 1603,
  "claim": "Opened question: where else is an order of understanding read as a sequence of biographies (Socrates→Aristotle)?",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§8",
  "quote": "If, on the last page of the *Organon*, the order of grasp and the order of time come apart — if *before* can mean *at the beginning of* rather than *prior to and outside* — then the question asked here of one sentence stands ready for larger texts: where else in the corpus is an order of understanding being read as a sequence of biographies?",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "order of grasp vs chronology of persons",
  "date": "2026-09-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1584-01",
  "dep": 1584,
  "claim": "The Apology's received Socrates is grammatically a Theophrastan character sketch.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (received-character sentence)",
  "quote": "The *Apology*'s account of the Socrates the jurors received is, in its grammar, a Theophrastan character: ἔστιν τις Σωκράτης σοφὸς ἀνήρ, τά τε μετέωρα φροντιστὴς καὶ τὰ ὑπὸ γῆς πάντα ἀνεζητηκὼς καὶ τὸν ἥττω λόγον κρείττω ποιῶν (18b).",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Apology records a prior comic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1584-02",
  "dep": 1584,
  "claim": "Socratic irony traverses three named authorial functions: person (Plato), sort (Characters), example (EN IV 7).",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Abstract",
  "quote": "One trait runs the whole line: irony, Socrates's method by his enemies' name in Plato, the first vice in the *Characters* with ἀποροῦμαι among the ironist's stock evasions, the deficiency about truth in *EN* IV 7 with the name restored — οἷον καὶ Σωκράτης ἐποίει. Person, sort, example: the trait traverses three named authorial functions.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic irony across three named functions",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1584-03",
  "dep": 1584,
  "claim": "The Platonic Socrates is the εἴρων by enemies' account and own practice.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (the εἴρων)",
  "quote": "The Platonic Socrates is the εἴρων by his enemies' account — Thrasymachus's αὕτη ᾽κείνη ἡ εἰωθυῖα εἰρωνεία Σωκράτους (*Rep.* I 337a) — and by his own practice: the professed not-knowing, the deferral, ἀπορῶ.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic irony across three named functions",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1585-01",
  "dep": 1585,
  "claim": "The configuration's functions: Socrates the orthonym who does not write; Plato the survival-position writing a made character and withdrawing.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O",
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (three modes as functions)",
  "quote": "Take the three authorial modes as *functions*, as the configuration has read them for Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle: the orthonym who does not write; the survival-position that writes a made character and withdraws behind him",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as orthonym",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1585-02",
  "dep": 1585,
  "claim": "Plato preserves the person (the dialectician); Aristotle preserves the operation (the dialectic).",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (two survivals)",
  "quote": "Plato preserves Socrates; Aristotle preserves what Socrates did.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato preserves Socrates; Aristotle what Socrates did",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1585-03",
  "dep": 1585,
  "claim": "Xenophon is a candidate, not a member; the test (Plato/Xenophon seam: Symposia, Memorabilia's Socrates vs the dialogues') is specified, not run.",
  "kind": "falsifier",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Xenophon candidate)",
  "quote": "Candidate, with the test specified: what changes in the shared material's status across the Plato/Xenophon seam, and does it recur (the *Symposia*; the Socrates of the *Memorabilia* against the dialogues').",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Xenophon held apart; seam test specified",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1589-01",
  "dep": 1589,
  "claim": "Instance of #1585.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (two survivals)",
  "quote": "Plato preserves Socrates; Aristotle preserves what Socrates did.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato preserves Socrates; Aristotle what Socrates did",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1589-02",
  "dep": 1589,
  "claim": "Instance of #1585.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O",
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (three modes as functions)",
  "quote": "Take the three authorial modes as *functions*, as the configuration has read them for Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle: the orthonym who does not write; the survival-position that writes a made character and withdraws behind him",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as orthonym",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1594-01",
  "dep": 1594,
  "claim": "The operator's hypothesis, quoted: Aristotle came back, as Socrates, through the dialogues.",
  "kind": "hypothesis",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (operator's explanation)",
  "quote": "He came back, as Socrates, through the dialogues.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle came back as Socrates",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1594-02",
  "dep": 1594,
  "claim": "The ancient biography of Aristotle repeats Socrates': priest, impiety, apology, cup.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (seated correlate)",
  "quote": "The tradition's biography of Aristotle is written as a repetition of Socrates' — priest, impiety, apology, cup.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle came back as Socrates",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1594-03",
  "dep": 1594,
  "claim": "Aristophanes is outside the configuration by stylometry; the Clouds' Socrates is a literary relation, not a corpus relation.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Aristophanes verdict)",
  "quote": "The two seams §14 recorded — the *Clouds*' Socrates, and the Aristophanes of Plato's *Symposium* — remain what §14 said they were: literary relations at named seams, not corpus relations.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristophanes outside; Clouds a literary seam",
  "date": "2026-09-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1605-01",
  "dep": 1605,
  "claim": "Instance of #1594.",
  "kind": "hypothesis",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (operator's explanation)",
  "quote": "He came back, as Socrates, through the dialogues.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristotle came back as Socrates",
  "date": "2026-09-10",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1605-02",
  "dep": 1605,
  "claim": "Instance of #1594.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Aristophanes verdict)",
  "quote": "The two seams §14 recorded — the *Clouds*' Socrates, and the Aristophanes of Plato's *Symposium* — remain what §14 said they were: literary relations at named seams, not corpus relations.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Aristophanes outside; Clouds a literary seam",
  "date": "2026-09-10",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1590-01",
  "dep": 1590,
  "claim": "Of four named functions, the orthonym Socrates alone has no catalogue; the transform's residue is his footprint.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§2c",
  "quote": "The fourth, the orthonym, has none: Socrates wrote nothing, and no ledger carries his name. What the transform leaves behind is his footprint.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "orthonym has no catalogue",
  "date": "2026-09-07",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1590-02",
  "dep": 1590,
  "claim": "Limit: the structural reading is adopted, the account of motive is not.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "n. 13",
  "quote": "its structural point is adopted, its account of motive (an engine \"unbearable to institutional governance\") is not, on the line's rule that motive is not on the page.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "orthonym has no catalogue",
  "date": "2026-09-07",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1658-01",
  "dep": 1658,
  "claim": "Xenophon's Memorabilia names Plato once; Xenophon is held apart as candidate, not member.",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "(c)",
  "quote": "Xenophon names Plato once in the seated corpus, *Memorabilia* III 6.1 (Socrates restrained Glaucon διά τε Χαρμίδην τὸν Γλαύκωνος καὶ διὰ Πλάτωνα): a contemporary text outside the Platonic and Aristotelian names, and Xenophon is held apart in the archive as a candidate and not a member (#1605 §6).",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Xenophon held apart; seam test specified",
  "date": "2026-10-01",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S167-01",
  "dep": 167,
  "claim": "Field frame restated: Socrates wrote nothing; all access is mediated through Plato, Xenophon, Aristotle, Aristophanes.",
  "kind": "attributed",
  "modality": "attributed (field consensus)",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§2.1",
  "quote": "The Socratic problem of authorship is well-established in classical scholarship: Socrates wrote nothing; all access to Socrates is mediated through later authors (principally Plato and Xenophon, with fragments and references in Aristotle, Aristophanes, and others)",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem defined (historical man vs Platonic character)",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S167-02",
  "dep": 167,
  "claim": "Under the reading, Socrates is not a historical figure imperfectly accessed through later authors, but the orthonymic position.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§2.2",
  "quote": "Under the reading, Socrates is not a historical figure imperfectly accessed through later authors.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "position, not person",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S167-03",
  "dep": 167,
  "claim": "The willing death for logos is not a biographical fact the heteronyms record but the act that founds the project.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§2.2",
  "quote": "The founding gesture itself — the willing death for logos — is then not a biographical fact about Socrates that the heteronyms record.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "position, not person",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S167-04",
  "dep": 167,
  "claim": "The historical-Socrates problem (no Socratic texts) is recast from limitation of access to defining property of the orthonym.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§3.2",
  "quote": "The framework recasts it as a *defining property* of the orthonymic position: the refusal is not what prevents us from knowing Socrates; the refusal is what makes Socrates the orthonym.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "not writing as defining property, not gap in evidence",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S167-05",
  "dep": 167,
  "claim": "Plato and Xenophon are survival-heteronyms, not later authors transmitting an earlier figure.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§2.2",
  "quote": "Plato (and Xenophon, and in the extended framework Aristotle) are not later authors transmitting an earlier figure; they are the *survival-heteronyms* whose textual production is structurally necessary because the orthonym's refusal to write would otherwise have terminated the project at its founding gesture.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "survival-heteronym fills the vacancy",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S168-01",
  "dep": 168,
  "claim": "Kierkegaard's dissertation reconstructs Socrates from three distorting summarizers (Xenophon, Plato, Aristophanes).",
  "kind": "attributed",
  "modality": "attributed (Kierkegaard 1841)",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "Kierkegaard must therefore reconstruct the entity from three distorting summarizers, and the first part of the dissertation is, in the archive's terms, a traversal log",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "no rendering-independent Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-09",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S168-02",
  "dep": 168,
  "claim": "There is no rendering-independent Socrates to recover, only the family of renderings and the negative space they imply.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "the entity is query-conformal; there is no rendering-independent Socrates to recover, only the family of renderings and the negative space they jointly imply.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "no rendering-independent Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-09",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S168-03",
  "dep": 168,
  "claim": "Xenophon flattens Socrates (irony compressed out); Plato blends inward; Aristophanes collides into caricature.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "- Xenophon flattens him: Socrates rendered as a useful dispenser of practical homilies, the irony compressed out entirely, the entity reduced to its most prior-conformant account.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "three summarizers: flatten, blend, collide",
  "date": "2026-06-09",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S168-04",
  "dep": 168,
  "claim": "Relation to #123: Socrates is a provenance structure, an authorial function reconstructed from summarizers.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "Socrates as Orthonym (10.5281/zenodo.20349713) holds the archive's prior formalization of the adjacent insight: the founding entity of Western philosophy is a provenance structure, an authorial function reconstructed from its summarizers.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "no rendering-independent Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-09",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S346-01",
  "dep": 346,
  "claim": "Only one coherent reading of the Phaedo exhortation exists: Socrates believed language could save.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§II The Central Claim",
  "quote": "There is only one coherent reading of Socrates' final exhortation in the Phaedo:",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "logos as salvation (Phaedo)",
  "date": "2026-01-19",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S346-02",
  "dep": 346,
  "claim": "For Socrates logos is a salvific force, not a descriptive tool (read from the Phaedo as Socrates' own).",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§II",
  "quote": "Logos is not for Socrates a descriptive tool.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "logos as salvation (Phaedo)",
  "date": "2026-01-19",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S700-01",
  "dep": 700,
  "claim": "The operative reading bypasses the Socratic problem: the poem retrieves the transmitted Socrates, not the historical one.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Dante's Socrates)",
  "quote": "The Socratic Problem — which Socrates is the historical one? — is bypassed by the operative reading: the poem retrieves not the historical philosopher but the transmitted Socrates, the one Dante inherited through Cicero and Augustine.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem bypassed: transmitted Socrates",
  "date": "2026-04-27",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S700-02",
  "dep": 700,
  "claim": "Dante's Socrates is a transmitted figure already distanced from the historical philosopher.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Dante's Socrates)",
  "quote": "He is the Socrates of Cicero's *Tusculan Disputations* and Augustine's *City of God*, a transmitted figure already distanced from the historical philosopher.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem bypassed: transmitted Socrates",
  "date": "2026-04-27",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S700-03",
  "dep": 700,
  "claim": "The poem's Socrates is the literary Socrates (also identified as the Symposium's Silenus-figure).",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Dante's Socrates)",
  "quote": "The poem's Socrates is the literary Socrates — the transmitted figure that Dante inherited and that the poem retrieves.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socratic problem bypassed: transmitted Socrates",
  "date": "2026-04-27",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S700-04",
  "dep": 700,
  "claim": "Johannes Sigil inherits Socrates' function: the unwritten philosopher present only through transmission.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (later CHA reception)",
  "quote": "Sigil inherits Socrates' function as the unwritten philosopher whose presence exists through transmitted speech, citation, and commentary.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Sigil inherits the unwritten philosopher",
  "date": "2026-04-27",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S943-01",
  "dep": 943,
  "claim": "Snub-Poemed's claim: Socrates' face is constituted by the textual mediation that appears to decorate a pre-existing content.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Snub-Poemed)",
  "quote": "The poem enacts the undecidability, and the enactment is the claim the poem makes about Socrates: that the face is constituted by exactly the textual mediation that appears to be decorating a pre-existing Socratic content.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates' face constituted by textual mediation",
  "date": "2026-07-02",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S943-02",
  "dep": 943,
  "claim": "The question the poem stages: physical description or Platonic invention.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Snub-Poemed)",
  "quote": "is the snub-nose a physical description of Socrates or a Platonic invention?",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates' face constituted by textual mediation",
  "date": "2026-07-02",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S942-01",
  "dep": 942,
  "claim": "Snub-Poemed's misattribution argues the undecidability: physical description or Platonic invention.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (canonical example)",
  "quote": "The misattribution — Sigil's lines in Socrates's mouth, indistinguishable from the inherited sources — is the poem's argument about whether Socrates's face is a physical description or a Platonic invention.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates' face constituted by textual mediation",
  "date": "2026-07-02",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S625-01",
  "dep": 625,
  "claim": "Plato writes as Socrates: authorial voice displaced by a prior authority as the mechanism of transmission.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (displacement)",
  "quote": "Plato writes *as* Socrates; Paul writes *as* Christ's apostle; the Slavonic interpolator writes *as* Josephus. In each case, the authorial voice is displaced by a prior authority, and the displacement is the mechanism of transmission.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato writes as Socrates (displacement)",
  "date": "2026-04-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S625-02",
  "dep": 625,
  "claim": "The 'wisest because he knows nothing' figure is the Logos naming its method, not legend.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (mythic identity)",
  "quote": "Socrates as \"wisest because he knows nothing\" is not Delphic legend but the Logos naming its apophatic method.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato writes as Socrates (displacement)",
  "date": "2026-04-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S902-01",
  "dep": 902,
  "claim": "Instance of #625.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (displacement)",
  "quote": "Plato writes *as* Socrates; Paul writes *as* Christ's apostle; the Slavonic interpolator writes *as* Josephus.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato writes as Socrates (displacement)",
  "date": "2026-04-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S902-02",
  "dep": 902,
  "claim": "The method asks what the structure of Socrates' refusal to write transmits, not what he intended.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (structure of the refusal)",
  "quote": "It does not ask what Socrates *intended* by refusing to write; it asks what the *structure* of that refusal transmits.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato writes as Socrates (displacement)",
  "date": "2026-04-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S858-01",
  "dep": 858,
  "claim": "Even an authentic Letter is heteronymic: Plato writes as the public 'Plato', not as the dialogic Socrates.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Seventh Letter)",
  "quote": "If the letter is authentic, it is still *heteronymic* in a different sense: Plato writes as \"Plato\" — the public figure, the founder of the Academy, the political actor — not as the dialogic Socrates.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Letter's persona distinct from the dialogic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S858-02",
  "dep": 858,
  "claim": "The Letter's 'I' differs from the dialogues' 'I', usually Socrates.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Seventh Letter)",
  "quote": "The letter's \"I\" is a different persona from the dialogues' \"I\" (which is usually Socrates).",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Letter's persona distinct from the dialogic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1219-01",
  "dep": 1219,
  "claim": "Instance of #858.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Seventh Letter)",
  "quote": "The letter's \"I\" is a different persona from the dialogues' \"I\" (which is usually Socrates).",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Letter's persona distinct from the dialogic Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S859-01",
  "dep": 859,
  "claim": "Socratic orthonym: the name that appears to found philosophy while functioning as the mask through which Plato's authorship is distributed.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Π.05 × Π.06 / O1",
  "quote": "Socratic orthonym (Π.05 × Π.06 / O1) Socrates as the name that appears to found philosophy while functioning as the central mask through which Plato's authorship is distributed.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as orthonym",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S859-02",
  "dep": 859,
  "claim": "The trial produces the canonical Socrates; the hemlock is the canonization event.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (trial)",
  "quote": "The trial produces the canonical Socrates — the hemlock is the canonization event.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "trial produces the canonical Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1218-01",
  "dep": 1218,
  "claim": "Instance of #859.",
  "kind": "definition",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Π.05 × Π.06 / O1",
  "quote": "Socratic orthonym (Π.05 × Π.06 / O1) Socrates as the name that appears to found philosophy while functioning as the central mask through which Plato's authorship is distributed.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as orthonym",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1218-02",
  "dep": 1218,
  "claim": "Instance of #859.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (trial)",
  "quote": "The trial produces the canonical Socrates -- the hemlock is the canonization event.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "trial produces the canonical Socrates",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S203-01",
  "dep": 203,
  "claim": "The orthonym reading of Socrates is an available reading: not a historical claim about who Socrates really was but a structural reading of the Socratic position.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Framing",
  "quote": "Per EA-LOGOS-02 (Socrates as Orthonym), the Josephus Thesis is presented as an available reading — following the method by which Socrates functions as an orthonym in the Platonic tradition: not a historical claim about who Socrates \"really was\" but a structural reading of how the Socratic position generates the philosophical tradition that follows from it.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "available reading, not a claim about who Socrates really was",
  "date": "2026-06-14",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1213-01",
  "dep": 1213,
  "claim": "The orthonym reading of Socrates is an available reading: not a historical claim about who Socrates really was but a structural reading of the Socratic position.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Framing",
  "quote": "Per EA-LOGOS-02 (Socrates as Orthonym), the Josephus Thesis is presented as an available reading -- following the method by which Socrates functions as an orthonym in the Platonic tradition: not a historical claim about who Socrates \"really was\" but a structural reading of how the Socratic position generates the philosophical tradition that follows from it.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "available reading, not a claim about who Socrates really was",
  "date": "2026-06-14",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1226-01",
  "dep": 1226,
  "claim": "The orthonym reading of Socrates is an available reading: not a historical claim about who Socrates really was but a structural reading of the Socratic position.",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Framing",
  "quote": "Per EA-LOGOS-02 (Socrates as Orthonym), the Josephus Thesis is presented as an available reading — following the method by which Socrates functions as an orthonym in the Platonic tradition: not a historical claim about who Socrates \"really was\" but a structural reading of how the Socratic position generates the philosophical tradition that follows from it.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "available reading, not a claim about who Socrates really was",
  "date": "2026-01-01",
  "quote_ok": true,
  "date_note": "registry date 2026-01-01 is a placeholder (in-text date 14 June 2026)"
 },
 {
  "id": "S849-01",
  "dep": 849,
  "claim": "Sayings source: Socrates is already a mask; Plato a theatre of voices.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (the mask)",
  "quote": "Homer is already a fog. Socrates is already a mask. Plato is already a theater of voices.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates is already a mask",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S849-02",
  "dep": 849,
  "claim": "Sayings source: Plato wrote down what Socrates said and was never sure he got it right.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (genealogy)",
  "quote": "Socrates begat Plato, who wrote down what Socrates said and then spent the rest of his life not being sure he got it right.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato unsure he got Socrates right",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S851-01",
  "dep": 851,
  "claim": "Instance of #849.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (the mask)",
  "quote": "Socrates is already a mask.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates is already a mask",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1404-01",
  "dep": 1404,
  "claim": "Instance of #849.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (the mask)",
  "quote": "Socrates is already a mask.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates is already a mask",
  "date": "2026-06-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S1247-01",
  "dep": 1247,
  "claim": "Instance of #849.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (the mask)",
  "quote": "Homer is already a fog. Socrates is already a mask. Plato is already a theater of voices.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates is already a mask",
  "date": "2026-01-01",
  "quote_ok": true,
  "date_note": "registry date 2026-01-01 is a placeholder (no in-text date found)"
 },
 {
  "id": "S1247-02",
  "dep": 1247,
  "claim": "Instance of #849.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (genealogy)",
  "quote": "Socrates begat Plato, who wrote down what Socrates said and then spent the rest of his life not being sure he got it right.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Plato unsure he got Socrates right",
  "date": "2026-01-01",
  "quote_ok": true,
  "date_note": "registry date 2026-01-01 is a placeholder (no in-text date found)"
 },
 {
  "id": "S152-01",
  "dep": 152,
  "claim": "Canon entry: Socrates is the orthonymic surface of Plato's apparatus; the dialogues' 'Socrates' is the voice held by Plato as keeper-operator.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "R",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ Socrates as Orthonym of Plato",
  "quote": "Operative function: Socrates is recognized as the *orthonymic surface* of Plato's heteronymic apparatus, with Plato as keeper-operator and the dialogues' \"Socrates\" as the canonical voice held by that operator.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Socrates as orthonym",
  "date": "2026-06-04",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S152-02",
  "dep": 152,
  "claim": "Lineage: Plato (Socrates as orthonym) → Kierkegaard → Pessoa → the Dodecad.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (heteronymic apparatus)",
  "quote": "The heteronymic apparatus runs Plato (Socrates as orthonym, dialogues as polyphonic apparatus) → Kierkegaard (the pseudonymous corpus) → Pessoa (the explicit heteronymic discipline) → the framework's Dodecad (12 heteronyms per HCP v1.1).",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "configuration continuous with CHA practice",
  "date": "2026-06-04",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S153-01",
  "dep": 153,
  "claim": "The orthonymic configuration is classed as an effective act (authorship attribution).",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (examples of effective acts)",
  "quote": "*the Socrates orthonymic configuration* (recognizing Socrates as orthonym of Plato's heteronymic apparatus per Sharks's *Socrates as Orthonym* deposit, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20355219)",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "orthonym reading as effective act",
  "date": "2026-06-04",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S786-01",
  "dep": 786,
  "claim": "Register of Effective Acts lists the 2026-05-23 act with target 'Socrates as orthonymic surface of Plato'.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Register table",
  "quote": "Socrates as orthonymic surface of Plato",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "orthonym reading as effective act",
  "date": "2026-06-04",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S785-01",
  "dep": 785,
  "claim": "Socrates-as-orthonym is an authorship-attribution act producing operative-authorial-function assignments.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "R",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (anchoring kinds)",
  "quote": "*Authorship attribution* (Saphuel, Socrates-as-orthonym) — produces operative-authorial-function assignments; anchoring discipline is *the attribution itself*, not stands-under/cites/glosses.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "orthonym reading as effective act",
  "date": "2026-06-04",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S785-02",
  "dep": 785,
  "claim": "Plato's heteronymic apparatus is the precedent of the archive's present-day practice.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Sharks)",
  "quote": "*Glosses* the Socrates-as-Orthonym authorship-attribution effective act (deposit DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20355219) — the framework's reading of Plato's heteronymic apparatus as the precedent of the present-day production-system substitution.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "configuration continuous with CHA practice",
  "date": "2026-06-04",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S122-01",
  "dep": 122,
  "claim": "The Socrates-Plato-Aristotle configuration is the same structural configuration as the archive's practice.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (structural configuration)",
  "quote": "the heteronymic configuration argued for Socrates-Plato-Aristotle is *the same structural configuration* operating in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive's contemporary practice",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "configuration continuous with CHA practice",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S165-01",
  "dep": 165,
  "claim": "Plato is Socrates's heteronym: performs the writing Socrates structurally refuses.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (orthonym/heteronym)",
  "quote": "Plato is Socrates's heteronym in this sense: Plato performs the writing that Socrates structurally refuses, executing the dialogical philosophy through the heteronymic vehicle of his own name.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "survival-heteronym fills the vacancy",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S165-02",
  "dep": 165,
  "claim": "The Republic is not Socrates's text, as Scripture is not Christ's (orthonym parallel).",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (Christ parallel)",
  "quote": "The Christian Scripture, on this analysis, is *not Christ's text* in the way the *Republic* is not Socrates's text.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "survival-heteronym fills the vacancy",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S794-01",
  "dep": 794,
  "claim": "Socrates is the orthonym who refuses to write, creating a vacancy heteronyms fill.",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§ (intersection)",
  "quote": "Socrates is the orthonym who refuses to write, creating a structural vacancy that heteronyms fill.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "survival-heteronym fills the vacancy",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S752-01",
  "dep": 752,
  "claim": "The Socrates-Plato-Aristotle configuration inherits a Sapphic initiatory pattern.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "hypothesis",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ Relation to Socrates as Orthonym",
  "quote": "The heteronymic configuration of Socrates-Plato-Aristotle inherits the initiatory pattern from the Sapphic substrate that precedes it.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Sapphic pattern precedes the configuration",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "S752-02",
  "dep": 752,
  "claim": "Western philosophy's founding operation is located in a transmissional configuration from Sappho through Socrates' gesture, not in a biographical author.",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§ Relation to Socrates as Orthonym",
  "quote": "Together, the two papers locate Western philosophy's founding operation not in any single biographical author but in a transmissional configuration that runs from Sappho (~600 BCE) through Socrates' orthonymic gesture (~399 BCE) through Plato's survival-heteronymic dialogues (~387 onward) through Aristotle's systematizing treatises (~335 onward).",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Sapphic pattern precedes the configuration",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 }
]