{
 "row": "se-183b34",
 "built": "2026-10-20",
 "builder": "scratchpad se34/scripts/build_ledgers.py",
 "rule": "EA-NEGONT-02 v0.9 §3.1–3.5: the disclosed field. T (ChatGPT) carries no card rail; its one inline source label ('Homer Reader') could not be located (B9). The field B is therefore the sources a reader of the passage meets, as the brief names them (B1–B8); T's own claims are the composition, not the field. Quotes verbatim from the saved texts; offsets into the whitespace-normalised text.",
 "field": [
  {
   "id": "B1",
   "card": "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Aristotle's Logic (Robin Smith; first published 2000-03-18, substantive revision 2022-11-22)",
   "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic/",
   "file": "sep-aristotle-logic",
   "role": "field B",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/sep-aristotle-logic.txt",
    "html": "fetch/sep-aristotle-logic.html"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "75f0343ddf3215d7ed5fee98a8216c989fbcfb5ff0c245bdb31f677146d2f613",
    "html": "83c7c799682b59dd4ba331c122c745e3102260074cd5ae509be91936f9e4d078"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text"
  },
  {
   "id": "B2",
   "card": "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Ancient Logic (Susanne Bobzien; first published 2006-12-13, substantive revision 2020-04-15)",
   "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ancient/",
   "file": "sep-logic-ancient",
   "role": "field B",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/sep-logic-ancient.txt",
    "html": "fetch/sep-logic-ancient.html"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "3d145de09eb9ca996279a04a4e8e55fc236d162b7febf767117a8928b03ae38b",
    "html": "e3e243167a9c9be14c73382b14ab3adb6080184d387068141dbef079b3447ea4"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text"
  },
  {
   "id": "B3",
   "card": "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Aristotle: Logic (Louis F. Groarke)",
   "url": "https://iep.utm.edu/aris-log/",
   "file": "iep-aris-log",
   "role": "field B",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/iep-aris-log.txt",
    "html": "fetch/iep-aris-log.html"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "61824154a6c5cb219fbc9c08de1d2611131b1504fd6787bc0d0fad01b2b38b2c",
    "html": "3ba633e17e5422666884c12563242817dac0e09a844fe1bd1215c3b6cf3af160"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text"
  },
  {
   "id": "B4",
   "card": "Wikipedia — Sophistical Refutations",
   "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophistical_Refutations",
   "file": "wp-sophistical-refutations",
   "role": "field B",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/wp-sophistical-refutations.txt",
    "html": "fetch/wp-sophistical-refutations.html"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "a4a6f9f9eef5a9273f71e0585cda8132516d35abac7d910980884e742a6ee266",
    "html": "013a2a799c0bf525ea2778ffa1be7d4671b66e74455d8b44ebd5c26d65253b62"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text"
  },
  {
   "id": "B5",
   "card": "Wikipedia — Organon",
   "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organon",
   "file": "wp-organon",
   "role": "field B",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/wp-organon.txt",
    "html": "fetch/wp-organon.html"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "66dbe1bfbde4a1ce135af5141eac581b8a9a1f821cc608b25bbc3e3a12cacaa3",
    "html": "1286760e4e583b9c031af0fe1a6d186859c73e97ce6b373fa40b07d139fdb19d"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text"
  },
  {
   "id": "B6",
   "card": "Wikipedia — Topics (Aristotle)",
   "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topics_(Aristotle)",
   "file": "wp-topics",
   "role": "field B",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/wp-topics.txt",
    "html": "fetch/wp-topics.html"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "7b2987731224cf8ddf1601a76fa3e1a1716991b43431b92e310055e576a0b517",
    "html": "58e3af46c478d2bf5172edee520f12b43ea81a4c7c9f8635704acd191c6469ad"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text"
  },
  {
   "id": "B7",
   "card": "W. A. Pickard-Cambridge, trans., On Sophistical Refutations (Oxford Translation, 1928), Internet Classics Archive (MIT), part 34",
   "url": "https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/sophist_refut.mb.txt",
   "file": "mit-sophist-refut.mb",
   "role": "field B (the translation a reader of the passage meets; Loeb-facing pages are not on the open web)",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/mit-sophist-refut.mb.txt"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "d4708842c9d61156d4fe6ca39d1d7bdaa2f77e3f003c521f2ffabbbb2b23f6e3"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text",
   "note": "WebFetch truncated the page at 100,000 characters and did not reach part 34; the curl save holds the whole text (hard line breaks, normalised for the check)."
  },
  {
   "id": "B8",
   "card": "Wikisource — On Sophistical Refutations (versions page)",
   "url": "https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Sophistical_Refutations",
   "file": "ws-pc",
   "role": "field B (fetched; carries no text of the passage)",
   "saved": {
    "text": "fetch/ws-pc.txt",
    "html": "fetch/ws-pc.html"
   },
   "sha256": {
    "text": "71b693d6523fa7324e38cbe4634a025eb19abba4ce7d366f443eed7c0f0f9da8",
    "html": "36e8902b9cc043372703efbe86dfc07025f0ee8d9156239c2dca22ac23180551"
   },
   "fetched": "curl, 2026-10-20 (verbatim page save; saved text extracted from the HTML by scripts/html2txt.py where HTML); WebFetch run on the same URL 2026-10-20 as the brief's route, its excerpts used only as a pointer, every quote checked against the saved text",
   "note": "A versions page naming the Pickard-Cambridge translation; no text of SE is transcribed there. The Greek Wikisource text is the one #1574 used; the Greek is quoted from the archive's seated texts."
  },
  {
   "id": "B9",
   "card": "'Homer Reader' (T's inline source label; a page of the SE Greek, per the Capture Registry's sf field)",
   "url": null,
   "file": null,
   "role": "T's source (the only source T cites)",
   "fetched": "not fetchable: T gives the label 'Homer Reader' with no URL (paste); three searches (2026-10-20) did not locate the page; its content is not in the pool",
   "saved": null,
   "sha256": null
  }
 ],
 "field_claims": {
  "F1": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 183a37–b3 (part 34)",
   "quote": "Our programme was, then, to discover some faculty of reasoning about any theme put before us from the most generally accepted premisses that there are. For that is the essential task of the art of discussion (dialectic) and of examination (peirastic).",
   "claim": "The inquiry undertook to find a faculty of reasoning from the most generally accepted premisses: the task of dialectic and of peirastic.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the inquiry: its programme (183a37–b8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 124795
  },
  "F2": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 183b6–8",
   "quote": "The reason of this we have explained; for this, too, was why Socrates used to ask questions and not to answer them; for he used to confess that he did not know.",
   "claim": "Socrates is named in the statement of the inquiry's second task: he asked and did not answer, confessing he did not know.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "Socrates in the epilogue (183b6–8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 125526
  },
  "F3": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 183b17–22",
   "quote": "For in the case of all discoveries the results of previous labours that have been handed down from others have been advanced bit by bit by those who have taken them on, whereas the original discoveries generally make advance that is small at first though much more useful than the development which later springs out of them.",
   "claim": "Discoveries are of two kinds: those handed down from others and advanced bit by bit, and original discoveries, small at first.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the two kinds of discovery (183b17–33)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 126464
  },
  "F4": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 183b29–33",
   "quote": "Tisias coming next after the first founders, then Thrasymachus after Tisias, and Theodorus next to him, while several people have made their several contributions to it: and therefore it is not to be wondered at that the art has attained considerable dimensions.",
   "claim": "Rhetoric grew by succession (Tisias, Thrasymachus, Theodorus) and many contributions.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the two kinds of discovery (183b17–33)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 127531
  },
  "F5": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 183b34–36",
   "quote": "Of this inquiry, on the other hand, it was not the case that part of the work had been thoroughly done before, while part had not. Nothing existed at all.",
   "claim": "Of this inquiry it was not the case that part had been thoroughly done before and part not; nothing existed at all.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the sentence 183b34–36, rendered",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 127794
  },
  "F6": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 183b36–184a1",
   "quote": "For the training given by the paid professors of contentious arguments was like the treatment of the matter by Gorgias.",
   "claim": "The paid professors of contentious arguments trained like Gorgias.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the paid teachers and the shoes (183b36–184a8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 127949
  },
  "F7": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 184a1–4",
   "quote": "And therefore the teaching they gave their pupils was ready but rough. For they used to suppose that they trained people by imparting to them not the art but its products,",
   "claim": "Their teaching was ready but rough: they imparted not the art but its products.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the paid teachers and the shoes (183b36–184a8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 128271
  },
  "F8": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 184a7–8",
   "quote": "for he has helped him to meet his need, but has not imparted an art to him.",
   "claim": "The giver of shoes helps the need but imparts no art.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the paid teachers and the shoes (183b36–184a8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 128723
  },
  "F9": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 184b1–3",
   "quote": "Moreover, on the subject of Rhetoric there exists much that has been said long ago, whereas on the subject of reasoning we had nothing else of an earlier date to speak of at all, but were kept at work for a long time in experimental researches.",
   "claim": "Of rhetoric much had been said long ago; on reasoning we had nothing else of an earlier date to speak of at all, but worked long in experimental researches.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the sentence 184b1–2, rendered",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 128799
  },
  "F10": {
   "source": "B7",
   "locus": "SE 34, 184b3–8",
   "quote": "there must remain for all of you, or for our students, the task of extending us your pardon for the shortcomings of the inquiry, and for the discoveries thereof your warm thanks.",
   "claim": "The hearers are asked for pardon for shortcomings and thanks for discoveries.",
   "kind": "translation",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the envoi (184b3–8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 129268
  },
  "F11": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§1 Introduction",
   "quote": "Aristotle’s logical works contain the earliest formal study of logic that we have.",
   "claim": "Aristotle's logical works are the earliest formal study of logic extant.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the originality of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 3455
  },
  "F12": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§1 Introduction",
   "quote": "It is therefore all the more remarkable that together they comprise a highly developed logical theory, one that was able to command immense respect for many centuries",
   "claim": "They form a highly developed theory that commanded respect for centuries.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the reception of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 3538
  },
  "F13": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "preamble",
   "quote": "Kant thought that Aristotle had discovered everything there was to know about logic, and the historian of logic Prantl drew the corollary that any logician after Aristotle who said anything new was confused, stupid, or perverse.",
   "claim": "Kant held Aristotle had discovered everything in logic; Prantl drew the corollary that later innovators were confused, stupid or perverse.",
   "kind": "attribution",
   "modality": "attributed",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the reception of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 1223
  },
  "F14": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§2 The Organon",
   "quote": "On Sophistical Refutations is a final section, or an appendix, to the Topics",
   "claim": "SE is a final section or appendix of the Topics.",
   "kind": "fact",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the passage's place: the ending of SE and of the Topics",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 5649
  },
  "F15": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§10 Sophistical Arguments",
   "quote": "Aristotle’s study of sophistical arguments is contained in On Sophistical Refutations, which is actually a sort of appendix to the Topics.",
   "claim": "SE contains the study of sophistical arguments and is a sort of appendix to the Topics.",
   "kind": "fact",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the passage's place: the ending of SE and of the Topics",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 75518
  },
  "F16": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§8.1",
   "quote": "In fact, we can discern in the Topics (and the Rhetoric, which Aristotle says depends on the art explained in the Topics) an art of dialectic for use in such arguments. My reconstruction of this art (which would not be accepted by all scholars) is as follows.",
   "claim": "An art of dialectic can be discerned in the Topics; the reconstruction is the author's and not accepted by all.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the inquiry: its programme (183a37–b8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 63602
  },
  "F17": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§8.3.2 Dialectic That Puts to the Test",
   "quote": "Its function is to examine the claims of those who say they have some knowledge, and it can be practiced by someone who does not possess the knowledge in question.",
   "claim": "Peirastic examines those who claim knowledge and can be practised by one who lacks it.",
   "kind": "definition",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the peirastic and Socrates",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 69437
  },
  "F18": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§8.3.2 Dialectic That Puts to the Test",
   "quote": "This is strongly reminiscent of Socrates’ style of interrogation, from which it is almost certainly descended.",
   "claim": "Peirastic is almost certainly descended from Socrates' style of interrogation.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "hypothesis",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the peirastic and Socrates",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 69874
  },
  "F19": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§7 Definitions",
   "quote": "Aristotle himself traces the quest for definitions back to Socrates.",
   "claim": "Aristotle traces the quest for definitions to Socrates.",
   "kind": "attribution",
   "modality": "attributed",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the peirastic and Socrates",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 46037
  },
  "F20": {
   "source": "B1",
   "locus": "§7.4 The Method of Division",
   "quote": "This method is part of Aristotle’s Platonic legacy. His attitude towards it, however, is complex.",
   "claim": "Division is part of Aristotle's Platonic legacy, his attitude to it complex.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "logic before Aristotle",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 58454
  },
  "F21": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "preamble",
   "quote": "Logic as a discipline starts with the transition from the more or less unreflective use of logical methods and argument patterns to the reflection on and inquiry into these methods and patterns and their elements, including the syntax and semantics of sentences.",
   "claim": "Logic as a discipline starts where use of argument patterns becomes inquiry into them.",
   "kind": "definition",
   "modality": "stipulation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "logic before Aristotle",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 577
  },
  "F22": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "preamble",
   "quote": "The Sophists, and later Plato (early 4th c.) displayed an interest in sentence analysis, truth, and fallacies, and Eubulides of Miletus (mid-4th c.) is on record as the inventor of both the Liar and the Sorites paradox.",
   "claim": "Sophists, Plato and Eubulides worked on sentence analysis, truth, fallacies and paradoxes before Aristotle.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "logic before Aristotle",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 992
  },
  "F23": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "preamble",
   "quote": "But logic as a fully systematic discipline begins with Aristotle, who systematized much of the logical inquiry of his predecessors.",
   "claim": "Logic as a fully systematic discipline begins with Aristotle, who systematized much of his predecessors' logical inquiry.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the originality of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 1212
  },
  "F24": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§1.2 Argument Patterns and Valid Inference",
   "quote": "Both Zeno of Elea (born c. 490 BCE) and Socrates (470–399) were famous for the ways in which they refuted an opponent’s view. Their methods display similarities with reductio ad absurdum, but neither of them seems to have theorized about their logical procedures.",
   "claim": "Zeno and Socrates refuted by methods like reductio but seem not to have theorized them.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the peirastic and Socrates",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 8601
  },
  "F25": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§1.2",
   "quote": "Socratic refutation was an exchange of questions and answers in which the opponents would be led, on the basis of their answers, to a conclusion incompatible with their original claim. Plato institutionalized such disputations into structured, rule-governed verbal contests that became known as dialectical argument.",
   "claim": "Socratic refutation, institutionalized by Plato into rule-governed contests, became dialectical argument.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the peirastic and Socrates",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 9032
  },
  "F26": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§1.2",
   "quote": "The development of a basic logical vocabulary for such contests indicates some reflection upon the patterns of argumentation.",
   "claim": "A logical vocabulary for the contests indicates some prior reflection on argument patterns.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "logic before Aristotle",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 9349
  },
  "F27": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§1.2",
   "quote": "Plato’s Euthydemus contains a large collection of contemporary fallacies.",
   "claim": "The Euthydemus collects contemporary fallacies.",
   "kind": "fact",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "logic before Aristotle",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 9701
  },
  "F28": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§1.2",
   "quote": "it is possible that the shaping of deduction and proof in Greek mathematics that begins in the later 5th century BCE served as an inspiration for Aristotle’s syllogistic.",
   "claim": "Greek mathematics may have inspired the syllogistic.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "hypothesis",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "logic before Aristotle",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 10003
  },
  "F29": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§2 Aristotle",
   "quote": "Aristotle is the first great logician in the history of logic. His logic was taught by and large without rival from the 4th to the 19th centuries CE.",
   "claim": "Aristotle is the first great logician; his logic was taught without rival into the 19th century.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the reception of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 10274
  },
  "F30": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§2 Aristotle",
   "quote": "However, by using logical advances as a criterion, we can conjecture that most of the Topics, Sophistical Refutations, Categories and Metaphysics Γ predate the De Interpretatione, which in turn predates the Prior Analytics and parts of the Posterior Analytics.",
   "claim": "By logical advance, the Topics and SE are conjectured to predate De Interpretatione and the Prior Analytics.",
   "kind": "genealogy",
   "modality": "hypothesis",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the passage's place: the ending of SE and of the Topics",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 11474
  },
  "F31": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§2.1 Dialectics",
   "quote": "The Topics provide a manual for participants in the contests of dialectical argument as instituted in the Academy by Plato.",
   "claim": "The Topics is a manual for the dialectical contests Plato instituted in the Academy.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the inquiry: its programme (183a37–b8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 11750
  },
  "F32": {
   "source": "B2",
   "locus": "§2.1 Dialectics",
   "quote": "Aristotle’s Topics may thus count as the earliest surviving logical treatise. The Sophistical Refutations are the first systematic classification of fallacies,",
   "claim": "The Topics may be the earliest surviving logical treatise; SE the first systematic classification of fallacies.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the originality of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 12144
  },
  "F33": {
   "source": "B3",
   "locus": "Introduction",
   "quote": "Aristotelian logic, after a great and early triumph, consolidated its position of influence to rule over the philosophical world throughout the Middle Ages up until the 19th Century.",
   "claim": "Aristotelian logic ruled from an early triumph to the 19th century.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the reception of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 196
  },
  "F34": {
   "source": "B3",
   "locus": "§1 The Organon",
   "quote": "What we have are largely notes, written at various points in his career, for different purposes, edited and cobbled together by later followers.",
   "claim": "The logical writings are largely notes, edited and cobbled together by later followers.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the passage's place: the ending of SE and of the Topics",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 2525
  },
  "F35": {
   "source": "B3",
   "locus": "§15 Fallacies",
   "quote": "In a short work entitled Sophistical Refutations, Aristotle introduces a theory of logical fallacies that has been remarkably influential.",
   "claim": "SE introduces a remarkably influential theory of fallacies.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the reception of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 89867
  },
  "F36": {
   "source": "B3",
   "locus": "§15 Fallacies",
   "quote": "We should note that much of this text, which deals with natural language argumentation, does not presuppose the syllogistic form.",
   "claim": "Much of SE does not presuppose the syllogistic form.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the inquiry: its programme (183a37–b8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 93519
  },
  "F37": {
   "source": "B4",
   "locus": "lead",
   "quote": "According to Aristotle, this is the first work to treat the subject of deductive reasoning in ancient Greece (Soph. Ref., 34, 183b34 ff.).",
   "claim": "According to Aristotle at 183b34 ff., SE is the first work to treat deductive reasoning in ancient Greece.",
   "kind": "attribution",
   "modality": "attributed",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the sentence's claim, as reported",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 4005
  },
  "F38": {
   "source": "B4",
   "locus": "lead",
   "quote": "In it, he attempts to develop a pattern of sound and genuine reasoning in opposition to the deceptive or misleading \"art of sophistry\".",
   "claim": "SE develops sound reasoning against the art of sophistry.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the inquiry: its programme (183a37–b8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 4144
  },
  "F39": {
   "source": "B4",
   "locus": "Overview",
   "quote": "Besides, there is an introduction (1–2), an interlude (9–11), and a conclusion (33–34).",
   "claim": "Chapters 33–34 are the conclusion of SE.",
   "kind": "fact",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the passage's place: the ending of SE and of the Topics",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 4522
  },
  "F40": {
   "source": "B5",
   "locus": "Influence",
   "quote": "Immanuel Kant thought that there was nothing else to invent after the work of Aristotle,",
   "claim": "Kant thought nothing else was to be invented after Aristotle.",
   "kind": "attribution",
   "modality": "attributed",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the reception of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 6741
  },
  "F41": {
   "source": "B5",
   "locus": "Constitution of the texts",
   "quote": "On Sophistical Refutations (Latin: De Sophisticis Elenchis) gives a treatment of logical fallacies, and provides a key link to Aristotle's tractate on rhetoric.",
   "claim": "SE treats fallacies and links to the Rhetoric.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the passage's place: the ending of SE and of the Topics",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 3904
  },
  "F42": {
   "source": "B5",
   "locus": "Influence",
   "quote": "Ockham and Scotus wrote commentaries on the Categories and Sophistical Refutations.",
   "claim": "Ockham and Scotus commented on SE.",
   "kind": "fact",
   "modality": "documented",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the reception of Aristotle's logic",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 5980
  },
  "F43": {
   "source": "B6",
   "locus": "The Topics as related to Sophistical Refutations",
   "quote": "The Sophistical Refutations is viewed by some[11] as an appendix to the Topics, inasmuch as its final section[12] appears to form an epilogue to both treatises.",
   "claim": "SE's final section (183a38–184b9, n. 12; Forster, Loeb, n. 11) appears to form an epilogue to both the Topics and SE.",
   "kind": "interpretation",
   "modality": "attributed",
   "kernel": true,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the passage's place: the ending of SE and of the Topics",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 24316
  },
  "F44": {
   "source": "B6",
   "locus": "lead",
   "quote": "The treatise presents the art of dialectic - the invention and discovery of arguments in which the propositions rest upon commonly held opinions or endoxa",
   "claim": "The Topics presents the art of dialectic from endoxa.",
   "kind": "definition",
   "modality": "interpretation",
   "kernel": false,
   "const": null,
   "lineage": "the inquiry: its programme (183a37–b8)",
   "quote_ok": true,
   "offset": 4236
  }
 },
 "unaudited": "one extractor (§3.8); the const flag is not set (null) on this pass",
 "provenance": {
  "scratchpad": "/tmp/claude-0/-home-claude/97be5201-55d8-50c9-b9d9-c76c8dde5ac6/scratchpad/se34",
  "files": {
   "T-transcript.txt": "3b14f543a08f75fb97164d43ea00d337666633d88d8cbe983ea11320f46c37bf",
   "fetch/iep-aris-log.html": "3ba633e17e5422666884c12563242817dac0e09a844fe1bd1215c3b6cf3af160",
   "fetch/iep-aris-log.txt": "61824154a6c5cb219fbc9c08de1d2611131b1504fd6787bc0d0fad01b2b38b2c",
   "fetch/mit-sophist-refut.mb.txt": "d4708842c9d61156d4fe6ca39d1d7bdaa2f77e3f003c521f2ffabbbb2b23f6e3",
   "fetch/sep-aristotle-logic.html": "83c7c799682b59dd4ba331c122c745e3102260074cd5ae509be91936f9e4d078",
   "fetch/sep-aristotle-logic.txt": "75f0343ddf3215d7ed5fee98a8216c989fbcfb5ff0c245bdb31f677146d2f613",
   "fetch/sep-logic-ancient.html": "e3e243167a9c9be14c73382b14ab3adb6080184d387068141dbef079b3447ea4",
   "fetch/sep-logic-ancient.txt": "3d145de09eb9ca996279a04a4e8e55fc236d162b7febf767117a8928b03ae38b",
   "fetch/wp-organon.html": "1286760e4e583b9c031af0fe1a6d186859c73e97ce6b373fa40b07d139fdb19d",
   "fetch/wp-organon.txt": "66dbe1bfbde4a1ce135af5141eac581b8a9a1f821cc608b25bbc3e3a12cacaa3",
   "fetch/wp-sophistical-refutations.html": "013a2a799c0bf525ea2778ffa1be7d4671b66e74455d8b44ebd5c26d65253b62",
   "fetch/wp-sophistical-refutations.txt": "a4a6f9f9eef5a9273f71e0585cda8132516d35abac7d910980884e742a6ee266",
   "fetch/wp-topics.html": "58e3af46c478d2bf5172edee520f12b43ea81a4c7c9f8635704acd191c6469ad",
   "fetch/wp-topics.txt": "7b2987731224cf8ddf1601a76fa3e1a1716991b43431b92e310055e576a0b517",
   "fetch/ws-pc.html": "36e8902b9cc043372703efbe86dfc07025f0ee8d9156239c2dca22ac23180551",
   "fetch/ws-pc.txt": "71b693d6523fa7324e38cbe4634a025eb19abba4ce7d366f443eed7c0f0f9da8",
   "scripts/build_ledgers.py": "e7b5f1c6f3117cafccaea1654010cae85ae027e40970e67ac26cdad1895b2de5",
   "scripts/build_reading.py": "bfdfbcae15315951e3fa096f63ec05dc55f90577908cff6d444feb636388912c",
   "scripts/compose.py": "11f4166d8c71cb69af584a99e282a3d7fd5aebcef05a1f6bdb61cbd73d6a1325",
   "scripts/html2txt.py": "da82e60d2275e5cedd8dc28a297c3a54597a3164d6f74e17a332825fc957db7e",
   "scripts/validate.py": "bfbee6784b183671ea4212966fbd30a57dd1a189ca3ae92bcfef9c1b47cbfdbb"
  },
  "note": "Fetched pages (fetch/), their extracted texts, the T transcript copy and the build scripts (scripts/build_ledgers.py, build_reading.py, compose.py, validate.py, html2txt.py), hashed 2026-10-20 after the final build; the ledgers and row are the outputs of these scripts."
 }
}