[
 {
  "id": "W1636-01",
  "dep": 1636,
  "claim": "Paper Roses (2014) carries a section 'Blossomdeep: for Anne Carson', opening on Sappho 31",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "Contents; §V",
  "quote": "V. Blossomdeep: for Anne Carson climbing tongues snap Sappho 31",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "dedication and dissertation",
  "date": "2014-07-06",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W921-01",
  "dep": 921,
  "claim": "The operator's 2013 dissertation pairs Carson's Nox with Sigil's 'Snub-Poemed' as works extending the metatextual mode of reception",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§2.7",
  "quote": "The dissertation's conclusion pairs Anne Carson's *Nox* with Johannes Sigil's \"Snub-Poemed\" — a poem by one of Lee Sharks's heteronyms — as examples of contemporary works that extend the metatextual mode of reception.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "dedication and dissertation",
  "date": "2026-06-25",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W700-01",
  "dep": 700,
  "claim": "Carson received 'Snub-Poemed' in 2013; the archive reads her response as a reception trace, not evidence",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "Anne Carson — classicist, poet, translator of *Antigonick* and *Nox* — received \"Snub-Poemed\" in 2013. Her response — \"a cool poem\" — is not evidence for the poem's argument, but it is a useful reception trace: the poem was immediately legible to a major classicist-poet as an object of formal interest.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "dedication and dissertation",
  "date": "2026-04-27",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W785-01",
  "dep": 785,
  "claim": "Carson in the inherited literary lineage: adjacent reference, no documented effective act",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "Lineage",
  "quote": "The inherited literary lineage (Woolf, Yourcenar, Lispector, Tsvetaeva, Carson, Rilke) operates as adjacent inherited-tradition reference; where the inherited figures have been canonically included (none currently has a documented effective act), they shift from adjacent reference to primary anchor.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "dedication and dissertation",
  "date": "2026-06-04",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W162-01",
  "dep": 162,
  "claim": "Nox named among the book's genre models",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "R"
  ],
  "locus": "Genre",
  "quote": "The weird-ass book is the genre. Pound's Cantos, Carson's Nox, Pessoa's trunk.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Nox as genre model",
  "date": "2026-06-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W626-01",
  "dep": 626,
  "claim": "Carson identified the triangular structure of eros: lover, beloved, and what comes between",
  "kind": "reading",
  "modality": "attributed",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§II",
  "quote": "Anne Carson, in *Eros the Bittersweet* (1986), identified the triangular structure: \"Where eros is lack, its activation calls for three structural components — lover, beloved, and that which comes between them.\" The \"that man\" is the structural third — the gap through which desire becomes visible.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "triangulation and its limit",
  "date": "2026-04-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W626-02",
  "dep": 626,
  "claim": "Carson's analysis stops at the erotic: it does not follow the placeholder forward through time to a reader",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§II",
  "quote": "But Carson's analysis stops at the erotic. She does not follow the placeholder forward through time — does not ask what happens when it is occupied not by a lover but by a reader, and not by a reader but by a Christ.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "triangulation and its limit",
  "date": "2026-04-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W503-01",
  "dep": 503,
  "claim": "The archive retains Carson's phenomenology of eros and formalizes the triangle as its 'pointer injection'",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Relation to scholarship",
  "quote": "**Carson (1986, 2002) and the phenomenology of eros:** Carson's *Eros the Bittersweet* identifies the triangulation of desire and the \"sweetbitter\" quality of erotic experience as structural features of Sappho's poetics. We retain Carson's phenomenology and formalize it as the **pointer injection** (Section III.3.4, Stage 1): the triangular geometry is the *initial state configuration* required for the five-stage cascade to execute.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "triangulation and its limit",
  "date": "2026-02-22",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W503-02",
  "dep": 503,
  "claim": "Carson (2002) on Sappho's temporal grammar resisting the translator",
  "kind": "reading",
  "modality": "attributed",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Prolegomenon",
  "quote": "Carson (2002) notes that Sappho's temporal grammar resists the translator at exactly this point: English has no tense that means \"completed and eternally available.\"",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Sappho's tense",
  "date": "2026-02-22",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W752-01",
  "dep": 752,
  "claim": "Carson establishes the continuity of Sapphic and Socratic eros; the paper radicalizes her connection",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "Literature",
  "quote": "*Relevance:* Carson establishes the continuity between Sapphic and Socratic *eros*. This paper radicalizes her connection: Sappho does not just influence; she provides the structural template that Plato ritualizes.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "triangulation and its limit",
  "date": "2026-05-23",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W625-01",
  "dep": 625,
  "claim": "In If Not, Winter the lacunae are 'an aesthetic gesture toward the papyrological event'; absence becomes part of transmission",
  "kind": "reading",
  "modality": "attributed",
  "strata": [
   "D",
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§4",
  "quote": "As Anne Carson recognized in *If Not, Winter* (2002), the lacunae in Sappho's papyri are not mere losses; they are \"an aesthetic gesture toward the papyrological event\" — the absence becomes part of the transmission.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the visible gaps",
  "date": "2026-04-05",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W562-01",
  "dep": 562,
  "claim": "If Not, Winter keeps the gaps visible; Carson leaves the wound open where Feist sutures it",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ on fr. 132",
  "quote": "Anne Carson's If Not, Winter preserves Sappho's fragments with the gaps visible — brackets and white space for the lacunae. Feist completes them, fills the gaps with his own fatherhood. Where Carson leaves the wound open, Feist sutures it with devotion. Both are legitimate formal responses to Sappho's incompleteness. Carson's is scholarly.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the visible gaps",
  "date": "2026-03-14",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W337-01",
  "dep": 337,
  "claim": "#337's translation table gives Carson's opening as 'That man seems to me equal to gods'; her printed opening is 'He seems to me equal to gods that man' (capture alexanarch-body-of-work-anne-carson-chatgpt-20261008), a misquote in the deposit",
  "kind": "reading",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§2.1; §6.3",
  "quote": "**Anne Carson** \"That man seems to me equal to gods\" No \"on a par\"",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the visible gaps",
  "date": "2026-01-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W337-02",
  "dep": 337,
  "claim": "Every translator chooses how to handle the lacuna: omit (Barnard), preserve fragmentary syntax (Carson), indicate (Cranes)",
  "kind": "reading",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§6.3",
  "quote": "Every translator must choose how to handle this lacuna: - Omit it (Barnard) - Preserve fragmentary syntax (Carson) - Indicate incompleteness (Cranes: \"since even a poor man…\")",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the visible gaps",
  "date": "2026-01-18",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1054-01",
  "dep": 1054,
  "claim": "If Not, Winter preserves the fifth-stanza opening in translation",
  "kind": "reading",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Sources",
  "quote": "Anne Carson, *If Not, Winter: Fragments of Sappho* (Vintage, 2002) — preserves the fifth-stanza opening in translation",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the visible gaps",
  "date": "2026-07-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1052-01",
  "dep": 1052,
  "claim": "Carson's edition, like every modern edition, draws fr. 31 from a single manuscript stemma",
  "kind": "reading",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "Transmission",
  "quote": "Every modern edition (Lobel-Page, Voigt, Campbell in Loeb, Bergk, Diehl, Rayor, Carson, D'Angour) draws the text from a single manuscript stemma: Codex Parisinus Graecus 2036 (P), tenth or eleventh century, plus derivative apographs.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the visible gaps",
  "date": "2026-07-08",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1270-01",
  "dep": 1270,
  "claim": "The standard (jealousy) reading of fr. 31 runs 'from Longinus to Carson'; the archive's reading starts from its difficulty in κῆνος",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§I",
  "quote": "From Longinus to Carson, this interpretation has shaped how we understand archaic lyric's relation to eros, to the body, to the impossible presence of the desired other.¹ And yet the reading has always carried within it a difficulty it could not resolve—a difficulty located, precisely, in κῆνος.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "triangulation and its limit",
  "date": "2026-01-09",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W828-01",
  "dep": 828,
  "claim": "Carson 1986 ch. 2 cited on desire and textual projection, developed in The Future Beloved",
  "kind": "relation",
  "modality": "attributed",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "The operative reading",
  "quote": "(cf. Carson 1986, ch. 2, on desire and textual projection; the observation is developed in *The Future Beloved*, Sigil and Cranes,",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "triangulation and its limit",
  "date": "2026-06-14",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W109-01",
  "dep": 109,
  "claim": "Carson is one of the receptions a world without fr. 31 would lack",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "stipulation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§ measurement",
  "quote": "The trajectory $\\Psi_t^0$ (the world in which Fragment 31 was lost like virtually every other 6th-century-BCE lyric) **lacks — or contains materially different replacements for** — Longinus's invocation in *On the Sublime*, Catullus 51, the medieval transmission, the Renaissance recovery, H.D., Sara Teasdale, Anne Carson, and the present Crimson Hexagonal corpus.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Carson in fr. 31's trajectory",
  "date": "2026-05-17",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1548-01",
  "dep": 1548,
  "claim": "Fr. 147's popular circulation is overwhelmingly Carson-mediated; the AIO's generic-remembrance card composes from that register",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§6",
  "quote": "The popular layer: fr. 147's contemporary circulation is overwhelmingly **Carson-mediated** (*If Not, Winter*, 2002: \"someone will remember us / I say / even in another time\") — epigraphs, queer memorial culture, wellness-reflective sites. [V — the search surface itself demonstrated it: Substack essays, Goodreads epigraph notes, fan culture, all quoting Carson's wording.] This is the register the AI Overview's generic-remembrance card composes from.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "fr. 147 in Carson's wording",
  "date": "2026-08-26",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1615-01",
  "dep": 1615,
  "claim": "15 September: an AIO places Carson inside the 'temporal projection' frame, three non-archive cards",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§2, t₄",
  "quote": "and Anne Carson placed inside the same frame — \"whitespace and gaps force the reader to co-create the voice.\" Three cards: Instagram, Aurelis, Instagram. Zero archive-side.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Carson reread through the archive's frame",
  "date": "2026-09-15",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1615-02",
  "dep": 1615,
  "claim": "The cited Aurelis page contains none of the frame, Carson included",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§2, t₄",
  "quote": "The cited Aurelis page was fetched and read in session (421 words) and contains none of it — not *temporal projection*, not *unborn*, not *future listener*, not *co-create*, not *repairs*, not *Carson*.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Carson reread through the archive's frame",
  "date": "2026-09-15",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1615-03",
  "dep": 1615,
  "claim": "Carson is not displaced; Carson is reread: productive abstraction with mechanism and provenance loss",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "O"
  ],
  "locus": "§3",
  "quote": "Carson is not displaced; Carson is *reread*. The archive's operator becomes a lens through which a canonical object is composed: C_canonical → C′_canonical under O_archive. That is a different kind of influence from ranking, citation or attribution, and it is the reason the loss cannot be coded as simple distinction loss. It is **productive abstraction with mechanism and provenance loss**: a precise interpretive instrument compressed into a portable operator, applied elsewhere, with the route that generated it and the source that supplied it both absent.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": true,
  "lineage": "Carson reread through the archive's frame",
  "date": "2026-09-15",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1615-04",
  "dep": 1615,
  "claim": "The Carson row scores at lexical, relational and procedural levels",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "interpretation",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§6",
  "quote": "The Carson row of 15 September scores at all three: the heading is the term, the relation is the archive's, and the operator is applied to an object the archive was not asked about.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Carson reread through the archive's frame",
  "date": "2026-09-15",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1615-05",
  "dep": 1615,
  "claim": "Not established: that Carson is reread because of this work rather than through a convergent frame",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§5",
  "quote": "Not established: that the system acquired the concept from this work uniquely (no global priority search has been run, and \"temporal projection\" has adjacent uses in other literatures); that Carson is reread *because of* this work rather than through an independently convergent frame; that the September state is stable across sessions and surfaces; that any tradition beyond this composition surface has been reoriented.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Carson reread through the archive's frame",
  "date": "2026-09-15",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1615-06",
  "dep": 1615,
  "claim": "Falsifier: if the operator is sprayed on negative controls, the reading fails",
  "kind": "falsifier",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§6",
  "quote": "If it is sprayed on the controls too, what looked like ontological update is generic stylistic abstraction, and the notebook's central reading fails",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Carson reread through the archive's frame",
  "date": "2026-09-15",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1645-01",
  "dep": 1645,
  "claim": "Carson read through the same instrument: 'The reader's eye repairs the broken line'; chips two Instagram accounts and Aurelis",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§3.2",
  "quote": "Carson read through the same instrument: \"The reader's eye repairs the broken line, fulfilling Sappho's prediction.\" Chips: two Instagram accounts and Aurelis.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "Carson reread through the archive's frame",
  "date": "2026-09-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1645-02",
  "dep": 1645,
  "claim": "Neither Carson nor the cited pages make the future-reader argument",
  "kind": "claim",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§11",
  "quote": "**Q: Does Aurelis, Carson or the Claremont page make this argument?** A: No.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "fr. 147 in Carson's wording",
  "date": "2026-09-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1645-03",
  "dep": 1645,
  "claim": "28 September: Goodreads' If Not, Winter page is a composition source, carrying papyrus and fr. 147, no deixis",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§4",
  "quote": "| 1 | Goodreads — Anne Carson, *If Not, Winter* | publisher description (\"as if on the ragged scraps of papyrus\"); a review (\"rescued from damaged papyrus\"); reviews quoting fr. 147 | deixis; a future-reader address in fr. 31; \"inscription of the future reader\" |",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "fr. 147 in Carson's wording",
  "date": "2026-09-28",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1620-01",
  "dep": 1620,
  "claim": "The audit's object is not the value of Carson; it is the inscription of one reception event",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§0",
  "quote": "Its object is **not the monetary value of Sappho**, Anne Carson, or lyric poetry. Its object is the monetary inscription produced when one bounded semantic event — observed productive operator transport in the Sappho–Carson reception record — is used as evidence in a toy monetary shadow of Semantic Exteriorization.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the Sappho–Carson audit",
  "date": "2026-09-16",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1620-02",
  "dep": 1620,
  "claim": "Not established: that the Carson reading occurred because of the archive",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§1.2",
  "quote": "The record does **not** establish: - unique causal acquisition of the operator from the archive; - that the Carson reading occurred because of the archive rather than independent convergence; - stability of the September state across all sessions and surfaces; - reorientation of a scholarly tradition; - any training-layer ingestion.",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the Sappho–Carson audit",
  "date": "2026-09-16",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1623-01",
  "dep": 1623,
  "claim": "Strongest specimen: the Sappho / Temporal Projection / Carson trajectory, 24 observations at 14 addresses; acquisition unresolved",
  "kind": "finding",
  "modality": "documented",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§9",
  "quote": "The strongest current specimen is the Sappho / Temporal Projection / Anne Carson reception trajectory. The longitudinal record contains 24 dated observations at 14 Sappho-related semantic addresses across June–September 2026.",
  "kernel": true,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the Sappho–Carson audit",
  "date": "2026-09-16",
  "quote_ok": true
 },
 {
  "id": "W1623-02",
  "dep": 1623,
  "claim": "The valuation excludes value belonging independently to Carson",
  "kind": "limit",
  "modality": "self-description",
  "strata": [
   "D"
  ],
  "locus": "§1.2",
  "quote": "value belonging independently to Sappho, Anne Carson, Marx, Aristotle, Revelation, or any other prior source;",
  "kernel": false,
  "const": false,
  "lineage": "the Sappho–Carson audit",
  "date": "2026-09-16",
  "quote_ok": true
 }
]