AI Mode Conversation


You said: Tell me about the arguments and speculative implications of Lee Sharks' Whose Face Is on the Twenty?Tell me about the arguments and speculative implications of Lee Sharks' Whose Face Is on the Twenty?

       "Whose Face Is on the Twenty?" is an interpretive, analytical essay by writer Lee Sharks, published on Medium. The piece investigates the visual presentation of the portrait on the redesigned United States $20 bill, arguing that the modern curatorial and aesthetic choices made during the currency's redesign process unintentionally or intentionally unmasked a stark, latent resemblance between the engraved portrait and Jeffrey Epstein.
Rather than leaning strictly into a definitive conspiracy theory, Sharks frames the argument around a "curatorial gap" and explores the speculative institutional implications of how modern design altered public perception.

The Core Arguments

Sharks breaks the thesis down into different levels of evidence, separating verifiable design changes from the speculative conclusions they invite:
• The Latent Resemblance (The Welch Engraving): Sharks argues that the foundational traits of this resemblance were "always in the steel" of the historical engraving by Thomas F. Welch. However, in older iterations of the currency (like the 1990 series), dense crosshatching and a smaller scale compressed these facial details into flat, undifferentiated shading.
• The Redesign's Unidirectional Effect: The core of the argument relies on the modern redesign choices—such as altering the scale, changing the background density, and removing the traditional oval border frame. Sharks points out that every single aesthetic modification made during the redesign increased the legibility of this resemblance, while none decreased it.
• Increased Feature Legibility: Sharks highlights specific physical features that became readable after the redesign:
	• Facial Asymmetry: The lighter background made a compressed nose-to-mouth crease readable as a deeper, asymmetrical fold on the subject's left side, mirroring Epstein's natural facial asymmetry.
	• Orbital Shadows: The removal of heavy crosshatching around the eyes allowed for graduated depth, creating volumetric brow shadows that closely resemble the deep eye sockets seen in photographs of Epstein.
• The Curatorial Gap: Sharks defines the central argument not as a proven plot, but as a "curatorial gap"—the total absence of public documentation explaining why these specific aesthetic framing choices were made.

Speculative Implications

Sharks categorizes the broader, more sensational conclusions as "Tier D" speculations—meaning they are unresolved but naturally prompted by the visual data:
• Awareness in the Redesign Process: The essay speculates whether the artists, engravers, or curatorial teams noticed the striking shift in likeness as they modernized the bill, and whether that resemblance was consciously recognized at any point during production.
• Institutional and Bureaucratic Coincidence: The text notes that the public officials responsible for final currency approvals during that era had documented real-world ties to Epstein. This raises the highly speculative implication of whether those institutional connections causally influenced the final aesthetic outcomes, or if the resulting likeness is simply a bizarre, systemic oversight born from undocumented bureaucratic choices.
Ultimately, Sharks' essay functions as a critique of visual mediation, showing how subtle changes in bureaucratic design can completely alter how the public "reads" an iconic piece of national imagery.
If you want to look closer into this topic, I can:
Provide a feature-by-feature breakdown of how the historical engraving compares to the modern redesign elements.Explore the history of the $20 bill's design transitions from the 1990s to the present.Detail how security and curatorial choices are typically documented by the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
Let me know how you would like to proceed!
Medium·Lee Sharks
Whose Face Is on the Twenty?. Curatorial Mediation, Latent Feature… - Medium
Tier C — Interpretive inference: The curatorial gap — the absence of public documentation for the aesthetic choices (specific scale, background density, frame r...
Medium·Lee Sharks
Whose Face Is on the Twenty?. Curatorial Mediation, Latent Feature…
In the 1990 bill, the creases from nose to mouth are compressed by small scale into undifferentiated shading. In the post-redesign bill, the asymmetry becomes l...
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more