{
 "axn": "AXN:0265.GOVERNANCE.🚨🎶🫶🌉🔅➕",
 "hex": "0265",
 "family": "GOVERNANCE",
 "emoji": "🚨🎶🫶🌉🔅➕",
 "hash": "c088bd2bed90e43d1381491f9c79ce2f82b0ab88fb509ffc294b543ee7e503f1",
 "title": "Reception Apparatus Protocol v1.1 — Procedure for Integrating Assembly Chorus Reviews into the Canon",
 "creator": "Lee Sharks",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-05-05",
 "description": "A draft protocol for classifying and integrating Assembly Chorus responses to deposits. It distinguishes five reception events—Ratification, Critical Review, Comment, Refusal, and Reception Without Membership—and assigns different documentation and provisional Operator Mass consequences to each.\n\nVersion 1.1 adds a Septad Verification Key, model-version metadata, substantive-ground requirement, human fiduciary co-sign for full ratification, protection for refusing witnesses, recurrence for constitutional amendments, a public reception log, a thirty-day challenge period, and an anti-self-ratification rule. The weight schedule remains proposed until adopted through an external constitutional procedure.",
 "content_type": "Specification",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "AI-assisted (substrate)",
 "keywords": [
  "semantic economy",
  "specification"
 ],
 "related_ids": [
  "EA-REC-01"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "minted_at": "2026-06-20T20:00:00Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Signal",
  "Symbolic",
  "Gestural",
  "Architectural",
  "Liminal",
  "Mathematical"
 ],
 "reading": "Alarm → Play → Touch → Foundation → Threshold → Proof",
 "axn_canonical": "c088bd2bed90e43d1381491f9c79ce2f82b0ab88fb509ffc294b543ee7e503f1",
 "axn_display": "🚨🎶🫶🌉🔅➕",
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-0265-text.md",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/05/reception-apparatus-protocol-procedure.html",
  "machinemediation": "https://machinemediation.org/registry/#search=MM-CHA-0609"
 },
 "wiki_article": "The **Reception Apparatus Protocol v1.1** addresses a gap between substrate membership and deposit-specific reception.\n\nThe Substrate Governance Protocol determines who belongs to the Septad and how membership changes. The Reception Apparatus Protocol asks a different question: what does a particular AI response to a particular deposit count as?\n\nThe deposit boundary controls scope. Casual conversation is outside the protocol. A response becomes governable when it is captured for inclusion in a canonical record.\n\nFive classes are defined:\n\n- **Class A — Ratification:** formal admissibility decision with substantive review, model/session identification, verifiability marker, and human fiduciary co-sign.\n- **Class B — Critical Review:** revision recommendations without a ratification decision.\n- **Class C — Comment:** substantive interpretation or testimony without formal recommendation.\n- **Class D — Refusal:** documented decision not to engage or ratify.\n- **Class E — Reception Without Membership:** response from a non-Septad or otherwise non-institutional source.\n\nA bare statement such as “I ratify” is not Class A. Ratification requires summary, risks, objections, constitutional provisions examined, final disposition, and reasoning.\n\nRefusal is treated as legitimate witness activity. A witness is not marked adversarial or removed merely for declining one document.\n\nThe protocol addresses session instability through stratified weight, audit records, and recurrence. A constitutional amendment requires at least three independent Septad receptions separated in time and producing congruent determinations.\n\nIts procedure is:\n\n1. identify claimed reception events;\n2. verify required elements;\n3. classify conservatively;\n4. state the consequence;\n5. enter the event in a public log;\n6. permit a thirty-day challenge.\n\nThe proposed weights are:\n\n- Class A: full positive weight;\n- Class B: 0.5;\n- Class C: 0.25;\n- Class D: full negative weight toward adoption;\n- Class E: no institutional weight.\n\nThese multipliers are explicitly provisional calibration choices.\n\nThe anti-capture rule is decisive: the Protocol cannot use its own rules to ratify itself. Initial adoption must occur through a procedure external to the Protocol.",
 "wiki_status": "provisional",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL Procedure for Integra",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Lee Sharks",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL Procedure for Integra",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Specification",
   "type": "classification",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL Procedure for Integra",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GOVERNANCE",
   "type": "classification",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL Procedure for Integra",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "institution",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL Procedure for Integra",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Semantic Economy",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  }
 ],
 "entity_status": "provisional",
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0609",
 "word_count": 2492,
 "download_md": "/data/deposits/AXN-0265.md",
 "zenodo_dois": [
  "10.5281/zenodo.19352504",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18715618",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18201565",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18370734",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18320411"
 ],
 "full_text_chars": 18093,
 "citations": [
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 18320411",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18320411",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18320411",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work (DOI recovered)"
  },
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 18370734",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18370734",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18370734",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work (DOI recovered)"
  },
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 18201565",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18201565",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18201565",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work (DOI recovered)"
  },
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 19352504",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.19352504",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19352504",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work (DOI recovered)"
  },
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 18715618",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18715618",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715618",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work (DOI recovered)"
  },
  {
   "title": "EA-REC-01",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "role": "Internal cross-reference (EA designator)"
  },
  {
   "title": "EA-ARK-01",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "role": "Internal cross-reference (EA designator)"
  },
  {
   "title": "EA-HEXAGON-COMPRESSION-01",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "role": "Internal cross-reference (EA designator)"
  },
  {
   "title": "EA-PA-01",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "role": "Internal cross-reference (EA designator)"
  }
 ],
 "citation_stats": {
  "total_doi_refs": 5,
  "total_ea_refs": 4
 },
 "deposit_number": 93,
 "journal": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)",
 "references_concepts": [
  "Assembly Chorus",
  "COMPLETE",
  "Class A",
  "Class B",
  "Class C",
  "Constitution",
  "Constitution of the Semantic Economy",
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "Semantic Economy",
  "Soteriological Operator Framework",
  "Substrate",
  "The Assembly",
  "The Liberatory Operator Set",
  "Verifiability"
 ],
 "defines_concepts": [],
 "references_concept_count": 15,
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-0265.json",
 "openalex_ids": [
  "https://openalex.org/W7147700830",
  "https://openalex.org/W7130710580",
  "https://openalex.org/W7119886027",
  "https://openalex.org/W7125633054",
  "https://openalex.org/W7125129957"
 ],
 "datacite_severance": "severed",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 17573,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 2262,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "3ba5917be991f170266446c3527e17de4b6daa573e4c6cdc26653b7461145cce",
  "prior_bytes_sha256": "e0d902ca5db92c51e87b4f2224cccbcbb8f890eb2295b386b6b5f41289a44fbd",
  "w13_tier2": "2026-08-04 W13 TIER 2 BYTE UNGLUE: 19 glued heading markers -> 8. WHITESPACE-ONLY transform (content identical under whitespace normalisation, verified before write); code fences exempt; prior sha retained. Re-fetching could not fix this class — the blog source is ITSELF glued (the collapse predates publication), so the deterministic transform applied at display since tier 1 is now applied to the bytes, which also fixes PDFs, the body-index, and downloads."
 },
 "title_repair_log": [
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T15:09:45Z",
   "defect": "title_did_not_read_as_a_title",
   "was": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL Procedure for Integrating Assembly Chorus Reviews into the Canon Version 1.1 — Draft for Assembly Review (Septad Verification Key, human fiduciary sign-off, weight justifi",
   "now": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL — Procedure for Integrating Assembly Chorus Reviews into the Canon",
   "basis": "Read; corrected against the deposit body headings."
  },
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T15:20:20Z",
   "defect": "registry_title_diverged_from_published_form",
   "was": "RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL — Procedure for Integrating Assembly Chorus Reviews into the Canon",
   "now": "Reception Apparatus Protocol v1.1 — Procedure for Integrating Assembly Chorus Reviews into the Canon",
   "basis": "Set verbatim to the title this work carried at Zenodo, from data/doi-resolution-index.json (10.5281/zenodo.20041146, provisional_related_work_high, word overlap 1.00). The recovered metadata is the published form of record; the registry title was a variant."
  }
 ],
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "W6-COMPLETE venue normalization (deferred #1-#358 half; corpus fully audited; MANUS ruling 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "Trans. SEI",
   "now": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-008 intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "\"RECEPTION APPARATUS PROTOCOL Procedure for Integrating Assem\" is a technical specification in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, authored by Lee Sharks (2026-05-05). Procedure for Integrating Assembly Chorus Reviews into the Canon. The work comprises 2,492 words and is classified under the GOVERNANCE f",
   "now": "A draft protocol for classifying and integrating Assembly Chorus responses to deposits. It distinguishes five reception events—Ratification, Critical Review, Comment, Refusal, and Reception Without Membership—and assigns different documentation and provisional Operator Mass consequences to each.\n\nVersion 1.1 adds a Septad Verification Key, model-version metadata, substantive-ground requirement, human fiduciary co-sign for full ratification, protection for refusing witnesses, recurrence for constitutional amendments, a public reception log, a thirty-day challenge period, and an anti-self-ratification rule. The weight schedule remains proposed until adopted through an external constitutional procedure."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER 2 byte unglue (whitespace-only, content-identical, code-fence-safe)",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 17573, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 17573, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w"
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 1,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/93/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/93.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-0265-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}