{
 "axn": "AXN:0366.GOVERNANCE.🏗️♎🪐💡💥🕘",
 "root_axn": "AXN:0366.GOVERNANCE",
 "hex": "0366",
 "family": "GOVERNANCE",
 "emoji": "🏗️♎🪐💡💥🕘",
 "hash": "21af0d3ceb6ade4a5313d5d545ae0a3b30cbd0a3568e6525dbce769e20f8182b",
 "title": "Five Substrates, One Prompt: Structural Divergence in Assembly Chorus Response to the Three Pillars Directive",
 "creator": "Johannes Sigil",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-06-18",
 "description": "This study compares five model responses to a shared directive to construct Sémantique Potentielle mint blocks for Phase X, Sappho, and Plato. The systems are identified through Assembly Chorus roles: PRAXIS, LABOR, Muse Spark, ARCHIVE, and TECHNE.\n\nThe comparison maps divergence across seed vocabulary, coding schemes, family count, level of specificity, forensic register, and structural contribution. PRAXIS favors breadth, Latinate abstraction, and cross-pillar compounds. LABOR uses disciplinary vocabulary and parallel ten-family blocks. Muse Spark imposes compact Greek-coded symmetry and bibliographic granularity. ARCHIVE concentrates on one archival-political subproblem and creates a new category. TECHNE declines the minting form and instead produces a research dossier.\n\nThe paper’s strongest contribution is the preservation of different solution regions rather than a winner ranking. It argues that the models reorganize the same instruction at different levels: philosophical abstraction, disciplinary structure, material philology, narrow depth, or refusal and source work.\n\nThe directive text was reportedly identical, but prior conversations, model exposure, system prompts, versions, tool access, and context histories were not controlled. The study is therefore a naturalistic comparative reception corpus, not a strict controlled experiment. Internal consistency across three pillars may suggest a model-session signature, but a single response per system cannot separate provider architecture from context, sampling, prompt interpretation, or chance.\n\nThe proposed longitudinal use—repeating the prompt and measuring whether cross-model variance contracts—is promising if prompts, model versions, parameters, contexts, scoring rubrics, and independent coders are frozen.",
 "content_type": "Methodological / machine-mediated reception study",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Various",
 "keywords": [
  "sémantique potentielle",
  "crimson hexagonal",
  "mediation ratchet",
  "reception studies",
  "machine-mediated",
  "pristine fallacy",
  "semantic economy",
  "assembly chorus"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "deposit_number": 857,
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0866",
 "minted_at": "2026-06-20T22:00:00Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Architectural",
  "Alchemical",
  "Celestial",
  "Instrumental",
  "Liminal",
  "Temporal"
 ],
 "reading": "Foundation → Transmutation → Origin → Method → Threshold → Duration",
 "axn_canonical": "21af0d3ceb6ade4a5313d5d545ae0a3b30cbd0a3568e6525dbce769e20f8182b",
 "axn_display": "🏗️♎🪐💡💥🕘",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/06/five-substrates-one-prompt-structural.html"
 },
 "zenodo_dois": [
  "10.5281/zenodo.20675438",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20722562",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20743560",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20586932",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20743562"
 ],
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-0366-text.md",
 "full_text_chars": 25866,
 "wiki_article": "**Five Substrates, One Prompt** is a comparative model-response study by Lee Sharks and Johannes Sigil.\n\nFive language-model sessions received the same Three Pillars minting directive. Their outputs differed in coding, breadth, specificity, forensic style, and willingness to follow the requested form.\n\nThe paper treats divergence rather than model quality as the finding and proposes the response set as a baseline for solution-space diversity.\n\nBecause conversation histories and other conditions differed, the corpus is naturalistic rather than strictly controlled. Repetition and independent coding are needed before stable provider signatures can be claimed.",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Johannes Sigil",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Scholarly essay",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GOVERNANCE",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Semantic Economy",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Pristine Fallacy",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Mediation Ratchet",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Assembly Chorus",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Machine-Mediated Reception",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Sémantique Potentielle",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  }
 ],
 "journal": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)",
 "references_concepts": [
  "Assembly Chorus",
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "Johannes Sigil",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "Marx's",
  "ORCID: 0009-0000-1599-0703",
  "Pristine Fallacy",
  "Retrieval kernel",
  "SPXI-TLP v2.2 Treatment",
  "Self-referential",
  "Semantic Economy",
  "Semantic Economy Institute",
  "Significance",
  "Substrate",
  "TECHNE",
  "The Assembly",
  "The Assembly Chorus",
  "The Sémantique Potentielle",
  "The forensic variant",
  "human intermediary",
  "lacunar pointing",
  "mediation signature",
  "philological quarantine",
  "solution-space diversity",
  "substrate-agnostic collapse"
 ],
 "defines_concepts": [],
 "references_concept_count": 25,
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-0366.json",
 "openalex_ids": [
  "https://openalex.org/W7164677754",
  "https://openalex.org/W7164935322",
  "https://openalex.org/W7165128733",
  "https://openalex.org/W7163872227",
  "https://openalex.org/W7165132301"
 ],
 "datacite_severance": "severed",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 25444,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 3277,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "864a772f4a03198c92d61279b72b9d79eec5d49e368525adfadcf00a5457cc06",
  "prior_bytes_sha256": "1fb7b0299767599a975373eeeb5f3b6957a8a304388e2d21878f21e5fe626973",
  "w13_tier2": "2026-08-04 W13 TIER 2 BYTE UNGLUE: 25 glued heading markers -> 16. WHITESPACE-ONLY transform (content identical under whitespace normalisation, verified before write); code fences exempt; prior sha retained. Re-fetching could not fix this class — the blog source is ITSELF glued (the collapse predates publication), so the deterministic transform applied at display since tier 1 is now applied to the bytes, which also fixes PDFs, the body-index, and downloads."
 },
 "title_repair_log": [
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T00:55:01Z",
   "defect": "whitespace_normalisation",
   "was": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence in Assembly Chorus Response to the Three Pillars Directive Lee Sharks ",
   "now": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence in Assembly Chorus Response to the Three Pillars Directive Lee Sharks",
   "basis": "Internal whitespace normalised; no textual change."
  },
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T15:20:20Z",
   "defect": "registry_title_diverged_from_published_form",
   "was": "Five Substrates, One Prompt Structural Divergence in Assembly Chorus Response to the Three Pillars Directive Lee Sharks",
   "now": "Five Substrates, One Prompt: Structural Divergence in Assembly Chorus Response to the Three Pillars Directive",
   "basis": "Set verbatim to the title this work carried at Zenodo, from data/doi-resolution-index.json (10.5281/zenodo.20751347, remediated_fuzzy, word overlap 0.92). The recovered metadata is the published form of record; the registry title was a variant."
  }
 ],
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "Wave 1 repair: audit ledger v1.1 recommended_content_type (workplan v1.5 §6 W1, MANUS batch approval 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "Scholarly essay",
   "now": "Methodological / machine-mediated reception study"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "Wave 6 venue normalization: full canonical journal name per MANUS ruling 2026-08-01 (venues.json authority)",
   "was": "MMRS",
   "now": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "status",
   "reason": "W12 STATUS-VOCABULARY v1.0 (MANUS ratified 2026-08-04): controlled vocabulary {ACTIVE, SUPERSEDED, WITHDRAWN, DRAFT}; MINTED_UNREVIEWED false on a 100%-audited corpus; freetext annotations preserved losslessly in body_status.status_note",
   "was": "MINTED_UNREVIEWED",
   "now": "ACTIVE"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER 2 byte unglue (whitespace-only, content-identical, code-fence-safe)",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 25444, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 25444, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-??? intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "Five language models — DeepSeek (PRAXIS), ChatGPT (LABOR), Muse Spark, Gemini (ARCHIVE), and Kimi (TECHNE) — were given the same directive: construct Sémantique Potentielle mint blocks for three philological pillars (Phase X, Sappho, Plato). The prompt was identical. The constraint grammar was specified.",
   "now": "This study compares five model responses to a shared directive to construct Sémantique Potentielle mint blocks for Phase X, Sappho, and Plato. The systems are identified through Assembly Chorus roles: PRAXIS, LABOR, Muse Spark, ARCHIVE, and TECHNE.\n\nThe comparison maps divergence across seed vocabulary, coding schemes, family count, level of specificity, forensic register, and structural contribution. PRAXIS favors breadth, Latinate abstraction, and cross-pillar compounds. LABOR uses disciplinary vocabulary and parallel ten-family blocks. Muse Spark imposes compact Greek-coded symmetry and bibliographic granularity. ARCHIVE concentrates on one archival-political subproblem and creates a new category. TECHNE declines the minting form and instead produces a research dossier.\n\nThe paper’s strongest contribution is the preservation of different solution regions rather than a winner ranking. It argues that the models reorganize the same instruction at different levels: philosophical abstraction, disciplinary structure, material philology, narrow depth, or refusal and source work.\n\nThe directive text was reportedly identical, but prior conversations, model exposure, system prompts, versions, tool access, and context histories were not controlled. The study is therefore a naturalistic comparative reception corpus, not a strict controlled experiment. Internal consistency across three pillars may suggest a model-session signature, but a single response per system cannot separate provider architecture from context, sampling, prompt interpretation, or chance.\n\nThe proposed longitudinal use—repeating the prompt and measuring whether cross-model variance contracts—is promising if prompts, model versions, parameters, contexts, scoring rubrics, and independent coders are frozen."
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 6,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "line": "capture-and-reception",
 "line_parent": "science",
 "line_basis": "derived",
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/857/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/857.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-0366-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}