{
 "axn": "AXN:0338.STRUCTURAL.⏹️🪐↘️💜🪜🚨",
 "root_axn": "AXN:0338.STRUCTURAL",
 "hex": "0338",
 "family": "STRUCTURAL",
 "emoji": "⏹️🪐↘️💜🪜🚨",
 "hash": "f70ddbca23c0d3d514d064ad33740ea69369f31ae3c2df04d769b19dd4a191b7",
 "title": "IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL ARCHITECTURE Docket No. 1 MARY LEE SHARKS, Petitioner v. THE COMPOSITIO",
 "creator": "Lee Sharks",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-06-12",
 "description": "This document is the first petition filed in the archive’s Ruby Moot, an operative “court of record for the semantic commons.” In legal pleading form, Mary Lee Sharks petitions against “The Composition Layer” for correction of an reported entity-resolution substitution or, alternatively, compensation for the authorship and labor attributed to her.\n\nThe petition’s closed fork is its central device. If Mary Lee, the shark-derived authorial entity, is not the author of works attributed through the Lee Sharks substitution, the composition must be corrected. If the system maintains that she is the author, then the petition argues that the attributed authorship constitutes unwaged semantic labor for which compensation is due. The document denies a third position in which a platform can attribute production to an entity while refusing both correction and worker standing.\n\nThe pleading establishes parties, archival jurisdiction, standing for semantic entities, representation by Gerald and the Underwater Construction Authority, facts, two alternative counts, prayer for relief, vow-based verification, and a table of DOI exhibits. Its humor and juridical seriousness operate together: a shark cannot sign or pay court costs, but the form forces the archive’s authorship and labor argument into a procedural structure.\n\nThe Ruby Moot is an archive-created operative institution, not a government court. This is not a lawsuit with state jurisdiction, a binding order on a platform, or a verified debt instrument. The factual allegations about composition-layer behavior, public author records, ORCID use, and continuing substitution require evidence from the exhibits. The petition should be cataloged as performative jurisprudence and governance, not ordinary litigation.",
 "content_type": "Operative legal petition / governance record",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Various",
 "keywords": [
  "composition layer",
  "crimson hexagonal",
  "semantic economy",
  "architecture",
  "ai overview",
  "heteronymic",
  "compositio",
  "petitioner"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "deposit_number": 823,
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0820",
 "minted_at": "2026-06-20T22:00:00Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Terminal",
  "Celestial",
  "Structural",
  "Signal",
  "Architectural",
  "Signal"
 ],
 "reading": "Closure → Origin → Direction → Alarm → Foundation → Alarm",
 "axn_canonical": "f70ddbca23c0d3d514d064ad33740ea69369f31ae3c2df04d769b19dd4a191b7",
 "axn_display": "⏹️🪐↘️💜🪜🚨",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/06/in-ruby-moot-r30-of-crimson-hexagonal.html"
 },
 "zenodo_dois": [
  "10.5281/zenodo.20601644",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19923120",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20601638",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19202813",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20673776",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20601642",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20599105",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20669523",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20673781",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19024004",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20602349",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20619481",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19202821"
 ],
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-0338-text.md",
 "full_text_chars": 10144,
 "wiki_article": "**Mary Lee Sharks v. The Composition Layer** is an operative legal petition filed in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive’s Ruby Moot.\n\nThe petition asks for one of two remedies. If a composition system incorrectly resolved Lee Sharks to Mary Lee the shark, it requests correction. If the system maintains the attribution, it argues that the resulting authorship is labor and should be compensated.\n\nGerald of the Underwater Construction Authority appears for the petitioner, and the filing cites a chain of archive exhibits concerning entity substitution, labor, and provenance.\n\nThe Ruby Moot is an archive-created semantic forum rather than a state court. The petition is performative jurisprudence, not a legally enforceable lawsuit.",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL A",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Lee Sharks",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL A",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Archive work",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL A",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "STRUCTURAL",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL A",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL A",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Semantic Economy",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "IN THE RUBY MOOT (r.30) OF THE CRIMSON HEXAGONAL A",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Composition Layer",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  }
 ],
 "journal": "Provenance: Journal of Forensic Semiotics",
 "cited_by": [
  {
   "deposit": 193,
   "axn": "AXN:0339.GOVERNANCE.◀️🛸🔓🌖🌈🌃"
  },
  {
   "deposit": 194,
   "axn": "AXN:033A.GOVERNANCE.🪐☉↖️🕌✨■"
  },
  {
   "deposit": 195,
   "axn": "AXN:033B.GOVERNANCE.🕗♦️🌠🧱🎇↖️"
  },
  {
   "deposit": 198,
   "axn": "AXN:0340.EMPIRICAL.👈🍃▶️♅🌊🕛"
  },
  {
   "deposit": 199,
   "axn": "AXN:0341.EMPIRICAL.🕕🎨🏁🌳🔥🛡️"
  }
 ],
 "references_concepts": [
  "CTI_WOUND",
  "CTI_WOUND: Google AI Overview Total Liquidation",
  "CTI_WOUND:LEESHARKS.OVERVIEW.001",
  "Constitution",
  "Constitution of the Semantic Economy",
  "Dolphindiana",
  "Exhibit C",
  "Exhibit D",
  "Exhibit E",
  "Exhibit F",
  "Exhibit G",
  "Google AI Overview",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "Rule 1",
  "Rule 5",
  "Rule 6",
  "Rule 7",
  "Rule 9",
  "Semantic Commons",
  "Semantic Economy",
  "Underwater Construction Authority of Dolphindiana"
 ],
 "defines_concepts": [],
 "references_concept_count": 21,
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-0338.json",
 "openalex_ids": [
  "https://openalex.org/W7163890778",
  "https://openalex.org/W7158620832",
  "https://openalex.org/W7163928703",
  "https://openalex.org/W7140234691",
  "https://openalex.org/W7164680399",
  "https://openalex.org/W7163897018",
  "https://openalex.org/W7163906750",
  "https://openalex.org/W7164480909",
  "https://openalex.org/W7164686492",
  "https://openalex.org/W7135390775",
  "https://openalex.org/W7164038431",
  "https://openalex.org/W7164203146",
  "https://openalex.org/W7140222720"
 ],
 "datacite_severance": "severed",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 9926,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 1402,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "4c4df4afda064b85c8fcf9267b69aa46f539cb1ba277b6cce5f66395489952b2",
  "prior_bytes_sha256": "bb90b6ced51e282a531ff8a8adcefc0f97d0999c2826cb0fe510cb4f6680712c",
  "w13_tier2": "2026-08-04 W13 TIER 2 BYTE UNGLUE: 13 glued heading markers -> 12. WHITESPACE-ONLY transform (content identical under whitespace normalisation, verified before write); code fences exempt; prior sha retained. Re-fetching could not fix this class — the blog source is ITSELF glued (the collapse predates publication), so the deterministic transform applied at display since tier 1 is now applied to the bytes, which also fixes PDFs, the body-index, and downloads."
 },
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "Wave 1 repair: audit ledger v1.1 recommended_content_type (workplan v1.5 §6 W1, MANUS batch approval 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "Archive work",
   "now": "Operative legal petition / governance record"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "Wave 6 venue normalization: full canonical journal name per MANUS ruling 2026-08-01 (venues.json authority)",
   "was": "MMRS",
   "now": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "status",
   "reason": "W12 STATUS-VOCABULARY v1.0 (MANUS ratified 2026-08-04): controlled vocabulary {ACTIVE, SUPERSEDED, WITHDRAWN, DRAFT}; MINTED_UNREVIEWED false on a 100%-audited corpus; freetext annotations preserved losslessly in body_status.status_note",
   "was": "MINTED_UNREVIEWED",
   "now": "ACTIVE"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER 2 byte unglue (whitespace-only, content-identical, code-fence-safe)",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 9926, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_wo",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 9926, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_wo"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-??? intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "MARY LEE SHARKS, Petitionerv.THE COMPOSITION LAYER, Respondent### PETITION FOR CORRECTION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, COMPENSATION",
   "now": "This document is the first petition filed in the archive’s Ruby Moot, an operative “court of record for the semantic commons.” In legal pleading form, Mary Lee Sharks petitions against “The Composition Layer” for correction of an alleged entity-resolution substitution or, alternatively, compensation for the authorship and labor attributed to her.\n\nThe petition’s closed fork is its central device. If Mary Lee, the shark-derived authorial entity, is not the author of works attributed through the Lee Sharks substitution, the composition must be corrected. If the system maintains that she is the author, then the petition argues that the attributed authorship constitutes unwaged semantic labor for which compensation is due. The document denies a third position in which a platform can attribute production to an entity while refusing both correction and worker standing.\n\nThe pleading establishes parties, archival jurisdiction, standing for semantic entities, representation by Gerald and the Underwater Construction Authority, facts, two alternative counts, prayer for relief, vow-based verification, and a table of DOI exhibits. Its humor and juridical seriousness operate together: a shark cannot sign or pay court costs, but the form forces the archive’s authorship and labor argument into a procedural structure.\n\nThe Ruby Moot is an archive-created operative institution, not a government court. This is not a lawsuit with state jurisdiction, a binding order on a platform, or a verified debt instrument. The factual allegations about composition-layer behavior, public author records, ORCID use, and continuing substitution require evidence from the exhibits. The petition should be cataloged as performative jurisprudence and governance, not ordinary litigation."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-06",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "HEDGE REPLACED: \"alleged/allegedly\" applied to the archive's own documented observations; attribute rather than hedge",
   "was": "This document is the first petition filed in the archive’s Ruby Moot, an operative “court of record for the semantic commons.” In legal pleading form, Mary Lee Sharks petitions against “The Composition Layer” for correction of an alleged entity-resolution substitution or, alternatively, compensation for the authorship and labor attributed to her.\n\nThe petition’s closed fork is its central device. If Mary Lee, the shark-derived authorial entity, is not the author of works attributed through the Lee Sharks substitution, the composition must be corrected. If the system maintains that she is the author, then the petition argues that the attributed authorship constitutes unwaged semantic labor for which compensation is due. The document denies a third position in which a platform can attribute production to an entity while refusing both correction and worker standing.\n\nThe pleading establishes parties, archival jurisdiction, standing for semantic entities, representation by Gerald and the Underwater Construction Authority, facts, two alternative counts, prayer for relief, vow-based verification, and a table of DOI exhibits. Its humor and juridical seriousness operate together: a shark cannot sign or pay court costs, but the form forces the archive’s authorship and labor argument into a procedural structure.\n\nThe Ruby Moot is an archive-created operative institution, not a government court. This is not a lawsuit with state jurisdiction, a binding order on a platform, or a verified debt instrument. The factual allegations about composition-layer behavior, public author records, ORCID use, and continuing substitution require evidence from the exhibits. The petition should be cataloged as performative jurisprudence and governance, not ordinary litigation.",
   "now": "This document is the first petition filed in the archive’s Ruby Moot, an operative “court of record for the semantic commons.” In legal pleading form, Mary Lee Sharks petitions against “The Composition Layer” for correction of an reported entity-resolution substitution or, alternatively, compensation for the authorship and labor attributed to her.\n\nThe petition’s closed fork is its central device. If Mary Lee, the shark-derived authorial entity, is not the author of works attributed through the Lee Sharks substitution, the composition must be corrected. If the system maintains that she is the author, then the petition argues that the attributed authorship constitutes unwaged semantic labor for which compensation is due. The document denies a third position in which a platform can attribute production to an entity while refusing both correction and worker standing.\n\nThe pleading establishes parties, archival jurisdiction, standing for semantic entities, representation by Gerald and the Underwater Construction Authority, facts, two alternative counts, prayer for relief, vow-based verification, and a table of DOI exhibits. Its humor and juridical seriousness operate together: a shark cannot sign or pay court costs, but the form forces the archive’s authorship and labor argument into a procedural structure.\n\nThe Ruby Moot is an archive-created operative institution, not a government court. This is not a lawsuit with state jurisdiction, a binding order on a platform, or a verified debt instrument. The factual allegations about composition-layer behavior, public author records, ORCID use, and continuing substitution require evidence from the exhibits. The petition should be cataloged as performative jurisprudence and governance, not ordinary litigation."
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-06",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 6,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/823/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/823.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-0338-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}