{
 "axn": "AXN:030C.GOVERNANCE.🧡🌃📋🔜🕓🌾",
 "root_axn": "AXN:030C.GOVERNANCE",
 "hex": "030C",
 "family": "GOVERNANCE",
 "emoji": "🧡🌃📋🔜🕓🌾",
 "hash": "cee245f6651a3d25a525c5d68076461bc65b660c395fa002eefb5bf5903cf908",
 "title": "The Operative Field: A Map of Disciplines That Study Signs That Act (EA-OPSEM-FIELDMAP-01 v1.0)",
 "creator": "Lee Sharks",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-06-09",
 "description": "*The Operative Field* maps disciplines concerned with signs that produce effects rather than merely represent states. Entries include speech-act theory, Peircean semiosis, document theory, rhetoric and propaganda, platform studies, metadata and knowledge-graph engineering, prompt engineering, training-layer literature, computational law, and operative philology.\n\nEach field is described through five coordinates: operative object, substrate, target, mechanism, and commons effect. The inclusion test requires that a sign modify the system it enters, act within a specific substrate, and incur labor, attention, or computational cost. Formal semantic fields centered on static representation are placed outside the map, while Pearson’s Theory of Operational Semiotics is treated as an adjacent predecessor.\n\nThe document presents operative semiotics as a comparative vocabulary rather than a superdiscipline containing the mapped fields. Its proposed additions are fuel source, ledger structure, commons effect, provenance, and compression regime. That restraint should be preserved. The map is an archive-authored orientation document, not consensus classification.\n\nSeveral summaries compress complex traditions. Statements about what each field does not formalize need fuller literature review, especially in rhetoric, document studies, critical metadata, platform studies, legal theory, and Peircean scholarship. The commons variables are the archive’s overlay.",
 "content_type": "Disciplinary field map / navigation document",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Various",
 "keywords": [
  "crimson hexagonal",
  "eaopsemfieldmap",
  "compression",
  "disciplines",
  "governance",
  "provenance",
  "operative",
  "substrate"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "deposit_number": 798,
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0776",
 "minted_at": "2026-06-20T22:00:00Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Signal",
  "Liminal",
  "Scriptural",
  "Terminal",
  "Temporal",
  "Elemental"
 ],
 "reading": "Alarm → Threshold → Text → Closure → Duration → Force",
 "axn_canonical": "cee245f6651a3d25a525c5d68076461bc65b660c395fa002eefb5bf5903cf908",
 "axn_display": "🧡🌃📋🔜🕓🌾",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-operative-field-map-of-disciplines.html"
 },
 "zenodo_dois": [
  "10.5281/zenodo.20616413"
 ],
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-030C-text.md",
 "full_text_chars": 6523,
 "wiki_article": "**The Operative Field** is a disciplinary map by Lee Sharks of fields that study signs producing effects.\n\nIt includes speech-act theory, Peircean semiosis, document theory, rhetoric, platform studies, metadata engineering, prompt engineering, computational law, training-layer literature, and operative philology.\n\nEach field is compared by the object that acts, substrate, target, mechanism, and effect on a shared meaning commons.\n\nThe paper does not claim these disciplines are subdivisions of operative semiotics. It proposes one comparative framework for their overlapping concern with signs that intervene.",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "The Operative Field A Map of Disciplines That Stud",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Lee Sharks",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Operative Field A Map of Disciplines That Stud",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Navigation document",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Operative Field A Map of Disciplines That Stud",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GOVERNANCE",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Operative Field A Map of Disciplines That Stud",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  }
 ],
 "journal": "Grammata: Journal of Operative Philology",
 "defines_concepts": [],
 "references_concepts": [
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "ORCID: 0009-0000-1599-0703",
  "Performative Utterance",
  "Speech Act Theory",
  "Substrate",
  "Training-Layer"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 7,
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-030C.json",
 "openalex_ids": [],
 "datacite_severance": "severed",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 6354,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 832,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "aef7ad5686281326f6dd8218b0897ce07271e5a6d57bb5d8420948aff6d48a87",
  "prior_bytes_sha256": "652c5d9d99b48ad0d60fd562507791f2248fd6976b258ab0a979735e4809640b",
  "w13_tier2": "2026-08-04 W13 TIER 2 BYTE UNGLUE: 15 glued heading markers -> 10. WHITESPACE-ONLY transform (content identical under whitespace normalisation, verified before write); code fences exempt; prior sha retained. Re-fetching could not fix this class — the blog source is ITSELF glued (the collapse predates publication), so the deterministic transform applied at display since tier 1 is now applied to the bytes, which also fixes PDFs, the body-index, and downloads."
 },
 "title_repair_log": [
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T15:20:20Z",
   "defect": "registry_title_diverged_from_published_form",
   "was": "The Operative Field A Map of Disciplines That Study Signs That Act EA-OPSEM-FIELDMAP-01 v1.0 Lee Sharks Crimson Hexagon",
   "now": "The Operative Field: A Map of Disciplines That Study Signs That Act (EA-OPSEM-FIELDMAP-01 v1.0)",
   "basis": "Set verbatim to the title this work carried at Zenodo, from data/doi-resolution-index.json (10.5281/zenodo.20616413, remediated_fuzzy, word overlap 0.73). The recovered metadata is the published form of record; the registry title was a variant."
  }
 ],
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "Wave 1 repair: audit ledger v1.1 recommended_content_type (workplan v1.5 §6 W1, MANUS batch approval 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "Navigation document",
   "now": "Disciplinary field map / navigation document"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "Wave 6 venue normalization: full canonical journal name per MANUS ruling 2026-08-01 (venues.json authority)",
   "was": "MMRS",
   "now": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "status",
   "reason": "W12 STATUS-VOCABULARY v1.0 (MANUS ratified 2026-08-04): controlled vocabulary {ACTIVE, SUPERSEDED, WITHDRAWN, DRAFT}; MINTED_UNREVIEWED false on a 100%-audited corpus; freetext annotations preserved losslessly in body_status.status_note",
   "was": "MINTED_UNREVIEWED",
   "now": "ACTIVE"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER 2 byte unglue (whitespace-only, content-identical, code-fence-safe)",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 6354, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_wo",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 6354, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_wo"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-??? intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "Lee Sharks Crimson Hexagonal Archive | ORCID: 0009-0000-1599-0703",
   "now": "*The Operative Field* maps disciplines concerned with signs that produce effects rather than merely represent states. Entries include speech-act theory, Peircean semiosis, document theory, rhetoric and propaganda, platform studies, metadata and knowledge-graph engineering, prompt engineering, training-layer literature, computational law, and operative philology.\n\nEach field is described through five coordinates: operative object, substrate, target, mechanism, and commons effect. The inclusion test requires that a sign modify the system it enters, act within a specific substrate, and incur labor, attention, or computational cost. Formal semantic fields centered on static representation are placed outside the map, while Pearson’s Theory of Operational Semiotics is treated as an adjacent predecessor.\n\nThe document presents operative semiotics as a comparative vocabulary rather than a superdiscipline containing the mapped fields. Its proposed additions are fuel source, ledger structure, commons effect, provenance, and compression regime. That restraint should be preserved. The map is an archive-authored orientation document, not consensus classification.\n\nSeveral summaries compress complex traditions. Statements about what each field does not formalize need fuller literature review, especially in rhetoric, document studies, critical metadata, platform studies, legal theory, and Peircean scholarship. The commons variables are the archive’s overlay."
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 6,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "line": "protocol-and-governance",
 "line_parent": "governance",
 "line_basis": "derived",
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/798/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/798.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-030C-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}