{
 "axn": "AXN:02D6.GOVERNANCE.🔃♍🟡🎇🎲🀄",
 "root_axn": "AXN:02D6.GOVERNANCE",
 "hex": "02D6",
 "family": "GOVERNANCE",
 "emoji": "🔃♍🟡🎇🎲🀄",
 "hash": "deaec3e88d8fe3c8ecf1a6235deefcbaa5eb08b2283525154d865b069c18957c",
 "title": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabilization (RTOS)",
 "creator": "Lee Sharks",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-05-31",
 "description": "RTOS is a suspended draft exploring whether later user corrections can clarify an earlier task that was real but incompletely articulated. It distinguishes contemporaneous DSL from retrospectively stabilized DSL and sketches a score based on confirmation, correction, persistence, reduced task entropy, and a penalty for model-led drift.\n\nThe document’s real content is its prohibition. Only later user input may clarify task origin; a model cannot redirect the dialogue and then use the redirected conversation as evidence that its own frame was the task all along. Lead–lag precedence must classify whether the later frame was user-led or output-led. The proposed operator may not be deposited until it passes an adversarial case in which a genuine model redirect is followed by user pursuit and the operator still refuses retroactive legitimation.\n\nNo such successful break-test is reported. The title marks the branch as a dead end, the author register is unassigned, and the body says it is separate from the deposited DSL specification. The archive should preserve it as a documented danger and unrealized conjecture, not an operative metric.",
 "content_type": "Conjectural technical-method draft / dead-end record",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Various",
 "keywords": [
  "sketch operator (conjectural)",
  "lead-lag precedence",
  "the real phenomenon",
  "not invented late",
  "stabilization",
  "retrocausal",
  "governance",
  "taskorigin"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "deposit_number": 774,
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0722",
 "minted_at": "2026-06-20T22:00:00Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Structural",
  "Alchemical",
  "Signal",
  "Liminal",
  "Symbolic",
  "Symbolic"
 ],
 "reading": "Direction → Transmutation → Alarm → Threshold → Play → Play",
 "axn_canonical": "deaec3e88d8fe3c8ecf1a6235deefcbaa5eb08b2283525154d865b069c18957c",
 "axn_display": "🔃♍🟡🎇🎲🀄",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/05/draft-retrocausal-task-origin.html"
 },
 "zenodo_dois": [],
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-02D6-text.md",
 "full_text_chars": 5779,
 "wiki_article": "**Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabilization** is an abandoned or suspended methodological draft by Lee Sharks.\n\nThe draft considers whether later user corrections can reveal what an earlier, incompletely stated task was. It proposes comparing the score available at the time with a retrospective score after the task becomes clearer.\n\nThe proposed guardrail forbids a model from treating a frame it introduced as the user’s original intention. Only user-led confirmation, correction, or persistence may stabilize task origin, and lead–lag order must distinguish clarification from model-led drift.\n\nThe draft reports no successful adversarial test and explicitly says not to deposit or adopt the operator until it passes one. It is preserved as a dead-end record and warning about retrospective laundering.",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabiliz",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Lee Sharks",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabiliz",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Creative work (poetry)",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabiliz",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GOVERNANCE",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabiliz",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Illegitimate (model-led)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabilization (RTO",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "the model introduced the new frame first; the user spends later turns resisting or managing it; the "
  },
  {
   "subject": "Lead-Lag precedence",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabilization (RTO",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "(the existing identified operator), never by content:"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Legitimate (user-led)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabilization (RTO",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "user says \"yes, exactly\" / narrows rather than reverses / names what they were after / repeats a pri"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The break-test (deposit gate)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "DRAFT (deadend) — Retrocausal Task-Origin Stabilization (RTO",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "construct (or take from real history) a transcript in which the model introduced a frame the user di"
  }
 ],
 "journal": "Transactions on Substrate Engineering (Trans. Substrate Eng.)",
 "defines_concepts": [
  "Illegitimate (model-led)",
  "Lead-Lag precedence",
  "Legitimate (user-led)",
  "The break-test (deposit gate)"
 ],
 "references_concepts": [
  "Illegitimate (model-led)",
  "Lead-Lag precedence",
  "Legitimate (user-led)",
  "Semantic Labor",
  "Stabilization",
  "The break-test (deposit gate)"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 6,
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 4877,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 836,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31"
 },
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "Wave 1 repair: audit ledger v1.1 recommended_content_type (workplan v1.5 §6 W1, MANUS batch approval 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "Creative work (poetry)",
   "now": "Conjectural technical-method draft / dead-end record"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "Wave 6 venue normalization: full canonical journal name per MANUS ruling 2026-08-01 (venues.json authority)",
   "was": "Trans. SEI",
   "now": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "status",
   "reason": "W12 STATUS-VOCABULARY v1.0 (MANUS ratified 2026-08-04): controlled vocabulary {ACTIVE, SUPERSEDED, WITHDRAWN, DRAFT}; MINTED_UNREVIEWED false on a 100%-audited corpus; freetext annotations preserved losslessly in body_status.status_note",
   "was": "MINTED_UNREVIEWED",
   "now": "ACTIVE"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-??? intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "Task-origin is often not fully present in the first input. The user frequently discovers the precise task through response, correction, and friction. So origin is both a prior constraint and a retroactively clarified event: real, but recognized late — not invented late.",
   "now": "RTOS is a suspended draft exploring whether later user corrections can clarify an earlier task that was real but incompletely articulated. It distinguishes contemporaneous DSL from retrospectively stabilized DSL and sketches a score based on confirmation, correction, persistence, reduced task entropy, and a penalty for model-led drift.\n\nThe document’s real content is its prohibition. Only later user input may clarify task origin; a model cannot redirect the dialogue and then use the redirected conversation as evidence that its own frame was the task all along. Lead–lag precedence must classify whether the later frame was user-led or output-led. The proposed operator may not be deposited until it passes an adversarial case in which a genuine model redirect is followed by user pursuit and the operator still refuses retroactive legitimation.\n\nNo such successful break-test is reported. The title marks the branch as a dead end, the author register is unassigned, and the body says it is separate from the deposited DSL specification. The archive should preserve it as a documented danger and unrealized conjecture, not an operative metric."
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 6,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "line": "protocol-and-governance",
 "line_parent": "governance",
 "line_basis": "derived",
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/774/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/774.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-02D6-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}